The Consequences of Assisted Reproduction Technologies on the Offspring Health Throughout Life: A Placental Contribution

A genetically small fetus impairs placental adaptations near term

The placenta is a gatekeeper between the mother and fetus, adapting its structure and functions to support optimal fetal growth. Studies exploring adaptations of placentae that support the development of genetically small fetuses are lacking. Here, using a mouse model of impaired fetal growth, achieved by deleting insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) in the epiblast, we assessed placental nutrient transfer and umbilical artery (UA) blood flow during late gestation. At embryonic day (E) 15.5, we observed a decline in the trans-placental flux of glucose and system A amino acids (by using 3H-MeG and 14C-MeAIB), proportionate to the diminished fetal size, whereas UA blood flow was normal. However, at E18.5, the trans-placental flux of both tracers was disproportionately decreased and accompanied by blunted UA blood flow. Feto-placental growth and nutrient transfer were more impaired in female conceptuses. Thus, reducing the fetal genetic demand for growth impairs the adaptations in placental blood flow and nutrient transport that normally support the fast fetal growth during late gestation. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the pathophysiology of pregnancies afflicted by fetal growth restriction.

Trophectoderm biopsy of blastocysts following IVF and embryo culture increases epigenetic dysregulation in a mouse model

STUDY QUESTION

Does trophectoderm biopsy (TEBx) of blastocysts for preimplantation genetic testing in the clinic affect normal placental and embryo development and offspring metabolic outcomes in a mouse model?

SUMMARY ANSWER

TEBx impacts placental and embryonic health during early development, with some alterations resolving and others worsening later in development and triggering metabolic changes in adult offspring.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous studies have not assessed the epigenetic and morphological impacts of TEBx either in human populations or in animal models.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We employed a mouse model to identify the effects of TEBx during IVF. Three groups were assessed: naturally conceived (Naturals), IVF, and IVF + TEBx, at two developmental timepoints: embryonic day (E)12.5 (n = 40/Naturals, n = 36/IVF, and n = 36/IVF + TEBx) and E18.5 (n = 42/Naturals, n = 30/IVF, and n = 35/IVF + TEBx). Additionally, to mimic clinical practice, we assessed a fourth group: IVF + TEBx + Vitrification (Vit) at E12.5 (n = 29) that combines TEBx and vitrification. To assess the effect of TEBx in offspring health, we characterized a 12-week-old cohort (n = 24/Naturals, n = 25/IVF and n = 25/IVF + TEBx).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Our mouse model used CF-1 females as egg donors and SJL/B6 males as sperm donors. IVF, TEBx, and vitrification were performed using standardized methods. Placenta morphology was evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin staining, in situ hybridization using Tpbpa as a junctional zone marker and immunohistochemistry using CD34 fetal endothelial cell markers. For molecular analysis of placentas and embryos, DNA methylation was analyzed using pyrosequencing, luminometric methylation assay, and chip array technology. Expression patterns were ascertained by RNA sequencing. Triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-, low-, and very low-density lipoprotein, insulin, and glucose were determined in the 12-week-old cohort using commercially available kits.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We observed that at E12.5, IVF + TEBx had a worse outcome in terms of changes in DNA methylation and differential gene expression in placentas and whole embryos compared with IVF alone and compared with Naturals. These changes were reflected in alterations in placental morphology and blood vessel density. At E18.5, early molecular changes in fetuses were maintained or exacerbated. With respect to placentas, the molecular and morphological changes, although different compared to Naturals, were equivalent to the IVF group, except for changes in blood vessel density, which persisted. Of note is that most differences were sex specific. We conclude that TEBx has more detrimental effects in mid-gestation placental and embryonic tissues, with alterations in embryonic tissues persisting or worsening in later developmental stages compared to IVF alone, and the addition of vitrification after TEBx results in more pronounced and potentially detrimental epigenetic effects: these changes are significantly different compared to Naturals. Finally, we observed that 12-week IVF + TEBx offspring, regardless of sex, showed higher glucose, insulin, triglycerides, lower total cholesterol, and lower high-density lipoprotein compared to IVF and Naturals, with only males having higher body weight compared to IVF and Naturals. Our findings in a mouse model additionally support the need for more studies to assess the impact of new procedures in ART to ensure healthy pregnancies and offspring outcomes.

LARGE SCALE DATA

Data reported in this work have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE225318.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was performed using a mouse model that mimics many clinical IVF procedures and outcomes observed in humans, where studies on early embryos are not possible.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study highlights the importance of assaying new procedures used in ART to assess their impact on placenta and embryo development, and offspring metabolic outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by a National Centers for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility grant P50 HD068157-06A1 (M.S.B., C.C., M.M.), Ruth L. Kirschstein National Service Award Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship F32 HD107914 (E.A.R.-C.) and F32 HD089623 (L.A.V.), and National Institutes of Health Training program in Cell and Molecular Biology T32 GM007229 (C.N.H.). No conflict of interest.

The mammalian preimplantation embryo: Its role in the environmental programming of postnatal health and performance

During formation of the preimplantation embryo several cellular and molecular milestones take place, making the few cells forming the early embryo vulnerable to environmental stressors than can impair epigenetic reprogramming and controls of gene expression. Although these molecular alterations can result in embryonic death, a significant developmental plasticity is present in the preimplantation embryo that promotes full-term pregnancy. Prenatal epigenetic modifications are inherited during mitosis and can perpetuate specific phenotypes during early postnatal development and adulthood. As such, the preimplantation phase is a developmental window where developmental programming can take place in response to the embryonic microenvironment present in vivo or in vitro. In this review, the relevance of the preimplantation embryo as a developmental stage where offspring health and performance can be programmed is discussed, with emphasis on malnutrition and assisted reproductive technologies; two major environmental insults with important implications for livestock production and human reproductive medicine.

Biobanks, offspring fitness and the influence of developmental plasticity in conservation biology

Mitigation of the widely known threats to the world's biodiversity is difficult, despite the strategies and actions proposed by international agreements such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Nevertheless, many scientists devote their time and effort to finding and implementing various solutions to the problem. One potential way forward that is gaining popularity involves the establishment of biobank programs aimed at preserving and storing germplasm from threatened species, and then using it to support the future viability and health of threatened populations. This involves developing and using assisted reproductive technologies to achieve their goals. Despite considerable advances in the effectiveness of reproductive technologies, differences between the reproductive behavior and physiology of widely differing taxonomic groups mean that this approach cannot be applied with equal success to many species. Moreover, evidence that epigenetic influences and developmental plasticity, whereby it is now understood that embryonic development, and subsequent health in later life, can be affected by peri-conceptional environmental conditions, is raising the possibility that cryopreservation methods themselves may have to be reviewed and revised when planning the biobanks. Here, I describe the benefits and problems associated with germplasm biobanking across various species, but also offer some realistic assessments of current progress and applications.

Placental adaptations supporting fetal growth during normal and adverse gestational environments

NEW FINDINGS

What is the topic of this review? How the placenta, which transports nutrients and oxygen to the fetus, may alter its support of fetal growth developmentally and with adverse gestational conditions. What advances does it highlight? Placental formation and function alter with the needs of the fetus for substrates for growth during normal gestation and when there is enhanced competition for substrates in species with multiple gestations or adverse gestational environments, and this is mediated by imprinted genes, signalling pathways, mitochondria and fetal sexomes.

ABSTRACT

The placenta is vital for mammalian development and a key determinant of life-long health. It is the interface between the mother and fetus and is responsible for transporting the nutrients and oxygen a fetus needs to develop and grow. Alterations in placental formation and function, therefore, have consequences for fetal growth and birthweight, which in turn determine perinatal survival and risk of non-communicable diseases for the offspring in later postnatal life. However, the placenta is not a static organ. As this review summarizes, research from multiple species has demonstrated that placental formation and function alter developmentally to the needs of the fetus for substrates for growth during normal gestation, as well as when there is greater competition for substrates in polytocous species and monotocous species with multiple gestations. The placenta also adapts in response to the gestational environment, integrating information about the ability of the mother to provide nutrients and oxygen with the needs of the fetus in that prevailing environment. In particular, placental structure (e.g. vascularity, surface area, blood flow, diffusion distance) and transport capacity (e.g. nutrient transporter levels and activity) respond to suboptimal gestational environments, namely malnutrition, obesity, hypoxia and maternal ageing. Mechanisms mediating developmentally and environmentally induced homeostatic responses of the placenta that help support normal fetal growth include imprinted genes, signalling pathways, subcellular constituents and fetal sexomes. Identification of these placental strategies may inform the development of therapies for complicated human pregnancies and advance understanding of the pathways underlying poor fetal outcomes and their consequences for health and disease risk.

Conservation Biology and Reproduction in a Time of Developmental Plasticity

The objective of this review is to ask whether, and how, principles in conservation biology may need to be revisited in light of new knowledge about the power of epigenetics to alter developmental pathways. Importantly, conservation breeding programmes, used widely by zoological parks and aquariums, may appear in some cases to reduce fitness by decreasing animals' abilities to cope when confronted with the 'wild side' of their natural habitats. Would less comfortable captive conditions lead to the selection of individuals that, despite being adapted to life in a captive environment, be better able to thrive if relocated to a more natural environment? While threatened populations may benefit from advanced reproductive technologies, these may actually induce undesirable epigenetic changes. Thus, there may be inherent risks to the health and welfare of offspring (as is suspected in humans). Advanced breeding technologies, especially those that aim to regenerate the rarest species using stem cell reprogramming and artificial gametes, may also lead to unwanted epigenetic modifications. Current knowledge is still incomplete, and therefore ethical decisions about novel breeding methods remain controversial and difficult to resolve.