Prognostic Value of Neoantigen Load in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cancer

Relevance of mutation-derived neoantigens and non-classical antigens for anticancer therapies

Efficacy of cancer immunotherapies relies on correct recognition of tumor antigens by lymphocytes, eliciting thus functional responses capable of eliminating tumor cells. Therefore, important efforts have been carried out in antigen identification, with the aim of understanding mechanisms of response to immunotherapy and to design safer and more efficient strategies. In addition to classical tumor-associated antigens identified during the last decades, implementation of next-generation sequencing methodologies is enabling the identification of neoantigens (neoAgs) arising from mutations, leading to the development of new neoAg-directed therapies. Moreover, there are numerous non-classical tumor antigens originated from other sources and identified by new methodologies. Here, we review the relevance of neoAgs in different immunotherapies and the results obtained by applying neoAg-based strategies. In addition, the different types of non-classical tumor antigens and the best approaches for their identification are described. This will help to increase the spectrum of targetable molecules useful in cancer immunotherapies.

ADAR-Mediated A>I(G) RNA Editing in the Genotoxic Drug Response of Breast Cancer

Epitranscriptomics is a field that delves into post-transcriptional changes. Among these modifications, the conversion of adenosine to inosine, traduced as guanosine (A>I(G)), is one of the known RNA-editing mechanisms, catalyzed by ADARs. This type of RNA editing is the most common type of editing in mammals and contributes to biological diversity. Disruption in the A>I(G) RNA-editing balance has been linked to diseases, including several types of cancer. Drug resistance in patients with cancer represents a significant public health concern, contributing to increased mortality rates resulting from therapy non-responsiveness and disease progression, representing the greatest challenge for researchers in this field. The A>I(G) RNA editing is involved in several mechanisms over the immunotherapy and genotoxic drug response and drug resistance. This review investigates the relationship between ADAR1 and specific A>I(G) RNA-edited sites, focusing particularly on breast cancer, and the impact of these sites on DNA damage repair and the immune response over anti-cancer therapy. We address the underlying mechanisms, bioinformatics, and in vitro strategies for the identification and validation of A>I(G) RNA-edited sites. We gathered databases related to A>I(G) RNA editing and cancer and discussed the potential clinical and research implications of understanding A>I(G) RNA-editing patterns. Understanding the intricate role of ADAR1-mediated A>I(G) RNA editing in breast cancer holds significant promise for the development of personalized treatment approaches tailored to individual patients' A>I(G) RNA-editing profiles.

Genomic and Epigenomic Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Immunotherapy Response in Melanoma: Current and Future Perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate durable responses, long-term survival benefits, and improved outcomes in cancer patients compared to chemotherapy. However, the majority of cancer patients do not respond to ICIs, and a high proportion of those patients who do respond to ICI therapy develop innate or acquired resistance to ICIs, limiting their clinical utility. The most studied predictive tissue biomarkers for ICI response are PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression, DNA mismatch repair deficiency, and tumour mutation burden, although these are weak predictors of ICI response. The identification of better predictive biomarkers remains an important goal to improve the identification of patients who would benefit from ICIs. Here, we review established and emerging biomarkers of ICI response, focusing on epigenomic and genomic alterations in cancer patients, which have the potential to help guide single-agent ICI immunotherapy or ICI immunotherapy in combination with other ICI immunotherapies or agents. We briefly review the current status of ICI response biomarkers, including investigational biomarkers, and we present insights into several emerging and promising epigenomic biomarker candidates, including current knowledge gaps in the context of ICI immunotherapy response in melanoma patients.

Induction of islet autoimmunity to defective ribosomal product of the insulin gene as neoantigen after anti-cancer immunotherapy leading to autoimmune diabetes

Introduction

The autoimmune response in type 1 diabetes (T1D), in which the beta cells expressing aberrant or modified proteins are killed, resembles an effective antitumor response. Defective ribosomal protein products in tumors are targets of the anti-tumor immune response that is unleashed by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment in cancer patients. We recently described a defective ribosomal product of the insulin gene (INS-DRiP) that is expressed in stressed beta cells and targeted by diabetogenic T cells. T1D patient-derived INS-DRiP specific T cells can kill beta cells and are present in the insulitic lesion. T cells reactive to INS-DRiP epitopes are part of the normal T cell repertoire and are believed to be kept in check by immune regulation without causing autoimmunity.

Method

T cell autoreactivity was tested using a combinatorial HLA multimer technology measuring a range of epitopes of islet autoantigens and neoantigen INS-DRiP. INS-DRiP expression in human pancreas and insulinoma sections was tested by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Here we report the induction of islet autoimmunity to INS-DRiP and diabetes after ICI treatment and successful tumor remission. Following ICI treatment, T cells of the cancer patient were primed against INS-DRiP among other diabetogenic antigens, while there was no sign of autoimmunity to this neoantigen before ICI treatment. Next, we demonstrated the expression of INS-DRiP as neoantigen in both pancreatic islets and insulinoma by staining with a monoclonal antibody to INS-DRiP.

Discussion

These results bridge cancer and T1D as two sides of the same coin and point to neoantigen expression in normal islets and insulinoma that may serve as target of both islet autoimmunity and tumor-related autoimmunity.

RPTOR mutation: a novel predictor of efficacious immunotherapy in melanoma

Identifying biomarkers to evaluate the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial. Regulatory Associated Protein of MTOR Complex 1 (RPTOR), one of the genes in the mTOR pathway, plays a role in regulating tumor progression. However, the connection between RPTOR mutation and the efficacy of ICIs in melanoma remains unclear. The data of ICIs-treated melanoma patients in discovery (n = 384) and validation (n = 320) cohorts were obtained from cBioPortal databases. The genomic data in the two cohorts was used to investigate the connection between RPTOR mutation and immunotherapy efficacy. The underlying mechanisms were explored based on data from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) cohort. Compared to melanoma patients with RPTOR wildtype (RPTOR-WT), RPTOR-mutation (RPTOR-Mut) patients achieved prolonged overall survival (OS) in both discovery cohort (median OS of 49.3 months vs. 21.7 months; HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.92; P = 0.026) and validation cohorts (not reached vs. 42.0 months; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.11-1.06; P = 0.049). RPTOR-Mut melanoma patients exhibited a higher objective response rate (ORR) than RPTOR-WT patients in the discovery cohort (55.0% vs. 29.0%, P = 0.022). RPTOR-Mut patients exhibited higher TMB than RPTOR-WT patients in both discovery and validation cohorts (P < 0.001). RPTOR-Mut melanoma patients had an increased number of DNA damage response (DDR) mutations in TCGA-SKCM cohort. Immune cell infiltration analysis suggested that activated CD4 memory T cells were more enriched in RPTOR-Mut tumors. RPTOR-Mut melanoma patients had higher expression levels of immune-related genes than the RPTOR-WT patients. Our results suggest that RPTOR mutation could serve as a predictor of effective immunotherapy for melanoma.

Refining PD-1/PD-L1 assessment for biomarker-guided immunotherapy: A review

Anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1)  immunotherapy is an increasingly crucial in cancer treatment. To date, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining protocols, commercially available in the form of "kits", facilitating testing for PD-L1 expression. These kits comprise four PD-L1 antibodies on two separate IHC platforms, each utilizing distinct, non-interchangeable scoring systems. Several factors, including tumor heterogeneity and the size of the tissue specimens assessed, can lead to PD-L1 status misclassification, potentially hindering the initiation of therapy. Therefore, the development of more accurate predictive biomarkers to distinguish between responders and non-responders prior to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy warrants further research. Achieving this goal necessitates refining sampling criteria, enhancing current methods of PD-L1 detection, and deepening our understanding of the impact of additional biomarkers. In this article, we review potential solutions to improve the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 assessment in order to more precisely anticipate patients' responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, monitor disease progression and predict clinical outcomes.

Update on Biomarkers in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly transformed the treatment paradigm for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), offering prolonged overall survival and achieving remarkable deep and durable responses. However, given the multiple ICI-containing, standard-of-care regimens approved for RCC, identifying biomarkers that predict therapeutic response and resistance is of critical importance. Although tumor-intrinsic features such as pathological characteristics, genomic alterations, and transcriptional signatures have been extensively investigated, they have yet to provide definitive, robust predictive biomarkers. Current research is exploring host factors through in-depth characterization of the immune system. Additionally, innovative technological approaches are being developed to overcome challenges presented by existing techniques, such as tumor heterogeneity. Promising avenues in biomarker discovery include the study of the microbiome, radiomics, and spatial transcriptomics.

Comparison of the somatic genomic landscape between central- and peripheral-type non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer is classified into central and peripheral types based on the anatomic location. The present study aimed to explore the distinct patterns of genomic alterations between central- and peripheral-type non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with negative driver genes and identify potential driver genes and biomarkers to improve therapy strategies for NSCLC.

METHODS

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed with 182 tumor/control pairs of samples from 145 Chinese NSCLC patients without EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations. Significantly mutated genes (SMGs) and somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) were identified. Subsequently, tumor mutation burden (TMB), weighted genome integrity index (wGII), copy number alteration (CNA) burden, Shannon diversity index (SDI), intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), neoantigen load (NAL), and clonal variations were evaluated in central- and peripheral-type NSCLCs. Furthermore, mutational signature analysis and survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene in NSCLC and more frequently mutated in central-type NSCLC. Higher wGII, ITH, and SDI were found in central-type lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) than in peripheral-type LUAD. The NAL of central-type lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) with stage III/IV was significantly higher than that of peripheral-type LUSC. Mutational signature analysis revealed that SBS10b, SBS24, and ID7 were significantly different in central- and peripheral-type NSCLCs. Furthermore, central-type NSCLC was found to evolve at a higher level with fewer clones and more subclones, particularly in central-type LUSC. Survival analysis revealed that TMB, CNA burden, NAL, subclonal driver mutations, and subclonal mutations were negatively related to the overall survival (OS) and the progression-free survival (PFS) of central-type LUAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Central-type NSCLC tended to evolve at a higher level and might suggest a favorable response to immunotherapy. Our study also identified several potential driver genes and promising biomarkers for the prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy responses in NSCLC.

Expression of cancer-testis antigens in the immune microenvironment of non-small cell lung cancer

The antigenic repertoire of tumors is critical for successful anti-cancer immune response and the efficacy of immunotherapy. Cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) are targets of humoral and cellular immune reactions. We aimed to characterize CTA expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of the immune microenvironment. Of 90 CTAs validated by RNA sequencing, eight CTAs (DPEP3, EZHIP, MAGEA4, MAGEB2, MAGEC2, PAGE1, PRAME, and TKTL1) were selected for immunohistochemical profiling in cancer tissues from 328 NSCLC patients. CTA expression was compared with immune cell densities in the tumor environment and with genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical data. Most NSCLC cases (79%) expressed at least one of the analyzed CTAs, and CTA protein expression correlated generally with RNA expression. CTA profiles were associated with immune profiles: high MAGEA4 expression was related to M2 macrophages (CD163) and regulatory T cells (FOXP3), low MAGEA4 was associated with T cells (CD3), and high EZHIP was associated with plasma cell infiltration (adj. P-value < 0.05). None of the CTAs correlated with clinical outcomes. The current study provides a comprehensive evaluation of CTAs and suggests that their association with immune cells may indicate in situ immunogenic effects. The findings support the rationale to harness CTAs as targets for immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in breast cancer: development, mechanisms of resistance and potential management strategies

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increased exponentially in the past decade, although its progress specifically for breast cancer has been modest. The first U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for ICI in breast cancer came in 2019, eight years after the first-ever approval of an ICI. At present, current indications for ICIs are relevant only to a subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, or those displaying high microsatellite instability or deficiency in the mismatch repair protein pathway. With an increasing understanding of the limitations of using ICIs, which stem from breast cancer being innately poorly immunogenic, as well as the presence of various intrinsic and acquired resistance pathways, ongoing trials are evaluating different combination therapies to overcome these barriers. In this review, we aim to describe the development timeline of ICIs and resistance mechanisms limiting their utility, and summarise the available approaches and ongoing trials relevant to overcoming each resistance mechanism.

Both cell autonomous and non-autonomous processes modulate the association between replication timing and mutation rate

Cancer somatic mutations are the product of multiple mutational and repair processes, some of which are tightly associated with DNA replication. Mutation rates (MR) are known to be higher in late replication timing (RT) regions, but different processes can affect this association. Systematic analysis of the mutational landscape of 2787 tumors from 32 tumor types revealed that approximately one third of the tumor samples show weak association between replication timing and mutation rate. Further analyses revealed that those samples have unique mutational signatures and are enriched with mutations in genes involved in DNA replication, DNA repair and chromatin structure. Surprisingly, analysis of differentially expressed genes between weak and strong RT-MR association groups revealed that tumors with weak association are enriched with genes associated with cell-cell communication and the immune system, suggesting a non-autonomous response to DNA damage.

A luminescence-based method to assess antigen presentation and antigen-specific T cell responses for in vitro screening of immunomodulatory checkpoints and therapeutics

Investigations into the strength of antigen-specific responses in vitro is becoming increasingly relevant for decision making in early-phase research of novel immunotherapeutic approaches, including adoptive cell but also immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies. In the latter, antigen-specific rapid and high throughput tools to investigate MHC/antigen-specific T cell receptor (TCR) activation haven't been implemented yet. Here, we present a simple and rapid luminescence-based approach using the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) E711-20 peptide as model antigen and E7-TCR transgenic Jurkat.NFAT-luciferase reporter cells. Upon E7 peptide pulsing of HLA-A2+ cell lines and macrophages, an effector to target ratio dependent increase in luminescence compared to non-pulsed cells was observed after co-incubation with E7-TCR expressing Jurkat, but not with parental cells. Analogous experiments with cells expressing full-length HPV16 identified that E7-specific activation of Jurkat cells enabled detection of endogenous antigen processing and MHC-I presentation. As proof of concept, overexpression of established checkpoints/inhibitory molecules (e.g., PD-L1 or HLA-G) significantly reduced the E7-specific TCR-induced luminescence, an effect that could be restored after treatment with corresponding targeting antagonistic antibodies. Altogether, the luminescence-based method described here represents an alternative approach for the rapid evaluation of MHC-dependent antigen-specific T cell responses in vitro. It can be used as a rapid tool to evaluate the impact of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment or novel ICI in triggering effective T cell responses, as well as speeding up the development of novel therapeutics within the immune-oncology field.

Orchestrating smart therapeutics to achieve optimal treatment in small cell lung cancer: recent progress and future directions

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant malignancy with elusive mechanism of pathogenesis and dismal prognosis. Over the past decades, platinum-based chemotherapy has been the backbone treatment for SCLC. However, subsequent chemoresistance after initial effectiveness urges researchers to explore novel therapeutic targets of SCLC. Recent years have witnessed significant improvements in targeted therapy in SCLC. New molecular candidates such as Ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related protein (ATR), WEE1, checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) have shown promising therapeutic utility in SCLC. While immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has emerged as an indispensable treatment modality for SCLC, approaches to boost efficacy and reduce toxicity as well as selection of reliable biomarkers for ICI in SCLC have remained elusive and warrants our further investigation. Given the increasing importance of precision medicine in SCLC, optimal subtyping of SCLC using multi-omics have gradually applied into clinical practice, which may identify more drug targets and better tailor treatment strategies to each individual patient. The present review summarizes recent progress and future directions in SCLC. In addition to the emerging new therapeutics, we also focus on the establishment of predictive model for early detection of SCLC. More importantly, we also propose a multi-dimensional model in the prognosis of SCLC to ultimately attain the goal of accurate treatment of SCLC.

Revisiting the Role of the CXCL13/CXCR5-Associated Immune Axis in Melanoma: Potential Implications for Anti-PD-1-Related Biomarker Research

CXCL13 is a potent chemoattractant cytokine that promotes the migration of cells expressing its cognate receptor, CXCR5. Accordingly, T follicular helper cells and B cells migrate towards B cell follicles in lymph nodes, where the resulting spatial proximity promotes B cell/T cell interaction and antibody formation. Moreover, effector cells of the CXCL13/CXCR5-associated immune axis express PD-1, with corresponding circulating cells occurring in the blood. The formation of so-called ectopic or tertiary lymphoid structures, recently detected in different cancer types, represents an integral part of this axis, particularly in the context of its emerging role in anti-tumor defense. These aspects of the CXCL13/CXCR5-associated immune axis are highlighted in this review, which focuses on cutaneous malignant melanoma. Specifically, we elaborate on the role of this important immune axis as a possible ancillary target of immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-PD-1 antibodies in different therapeutic settings and as a potential source of predictive biomarkers regarding treatment efficacy.

The benefit of immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: A systemic review of the survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in phase III hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) trials was conducted. Methods: Meta-analyses were performed with the generic inverse-variance method with a fixed-effects model. Results: In 10 trials encompassing 6123 patients, ICI-based therapy (monotherapy/combination) improved overall survival (OS) compared with the control arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.84; p < 0.001). The survival benefit was consistent across variable treatment lines, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and AFP levels. While the OS benefit was more pronounced in hepatitis B-related HCC (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63-0.77; p < 0.001), OS was improved in hepatitis C-related (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) and nonviral HCC (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97). Conclusion: ICI-based therapies should be the standard for all patients with advanced HCC.

Thiopurine 6TG treatment increases tumor immunogenicity and response to immune checkpoint blockade

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective in reinvigorating T cells to attack cancer. Nevertheless, a large subset of patients fails to benefit from ICI, partly due to lack of the cancer neoepitopes necessary to trigger an immune response. In this study, we used the thiopurine 6-thioguanine (6TG) to induce random mutations and thus increase the level of neoepitopes presented by tumor cells. Thiopurines are prodrugs which are converted into thioguanine nucleotides that are incorporated into DNA (DNA-TG), where they can induce mutation through single nucleotide mismatching. In a pre-clinical mouse model of a mutation-low melanoma cell line, we demonstrated that 6TG induced clinical-grade DNA-TG integration resulting in an improved tumor control that was strongly T cell dependent. 6TG exposure increased the tumor mutational burden, without affecting tumor cell proliferation and cell death. Moreover, 6TG treatment re-shaped the tumor microenvironment by increasing T and NK immune cells, making the tumors more responsive to immune-checkpoint blockade. We further validated that 6TG exposure improved tumor control in additional mouse models of melanoma. These findings have paved the way for a phase I/II clinical trial that explores whether treatment with thiopurines can increase the proportion of otherwise treatment-resistant cancer patients who may benefit from ICI therapy (NCT05276284).

Role of PARP Inhibitors in Cancer Immunotherapy: Potential Friends to Immune Activating Molecules and Foes to Immune Checkpoints

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) induce cytotoxic effects as single agents in tumors characterized by defective repair of DNA double-strand breaks deriving from BRCA1/2 mutations or other abnormalities in genes associated with homologous recombination. Preclinical studies have shown that PARPi-induced DNA damage may affect the tumor immune microenvironment and immune-mediated anti-tumor response through several mechanisms. In particular, increased DNA damage has been shown to induce the activation of type I interferon pathway and up-regulation of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, which can both enhance sensitivity to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Despite the recent approval of ICIs for a number of advanced cancer types based on their ability to reinvigorate T-cell-mediated antitumor immune responses, a consistent percentage of treated patients fail to respond, strongly encouraging the identification of combination therapies to overcome resistance. In the present review, we analyzed both established and unexplored mechanisms that may be elicited by PARPi, supporting immune reactivation and their potential synergism with currently used ICIs. This analysis may indicate novel and possibly patient-specific immune features that might represent new pharmacological targets of PARPi, potentially leading to the identification of predictive biomarkers of response to their combination with ICIs.

Cancer genome and tumor microenvironment: Reciprocal crosstalk shapes lung cancer plasticity

Lung cancer classification and treatment has been revolutionized by improving our understanding of driver mutations and the introduction of tumor microenvironment (TME)-associated immune checkpoint inhibitors. Despite the significant improvement of lung cancer patient survival in response to either oncogene-targeted therapy or anticancer immunotherapy, many patients show initial or acquired resistance to these new therapies. Recent advances in genome sequencing reveal that specific driver mutations favor the development of an immunosuppressive TME phenotype, which may result in unfavorable outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapies. Clinical studies with follow-up after immunotherapy, assessing oncogenic driver mutations and the TME immune profile, not only reveal the underlying potential molecular mechanisms in the resistant lung cancer patients but also hold the key to better treatment choices and the future of personalized medicine. In this review, we discuss the crosstalk between cancer cell genomic features and the TME to reveal the impact of genetic alterations on the TME phenotype. We also provide insights into the regulatory role of cellular TME components in defining the genetic landscape of cancer cells during tumor development.

Sources of Cancer Neoantigens beyond Single-Nucleotide Variants

The success of checkpoint blockade therapy against cancer has unequivocally shown that cancer cells can be effectively recognized by the immune system and eliminated. However, the identity of the cancer antigens that elicit protective immunity remains to be fully explored. Over the last decade, most of the focus has been on somatic mutations derived from non-synonymous single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertion/deletion mutations (indels) that accumulate during cancer progression. Mutated peptides can be presented on MHC molecules and give rise to novel antigens or neoantigens, which have been shown to induce potent anti-tumor immune responses. A limitation with SNV-neoantigens is that they are patient-specific and their accurate prediction is critical for the development of effective immunotherapies. In addition, cancer types with low mutation burden may not display sufficient high-quality [SNV/small indels] neoantigens to alone stimulate effective T cell responses. Accumulating evidence suggests the existence of alternative sources of cancer neoantigens, such as gene fusions, alternative splicing variants, post-translational modifications, and transposable elements, which may be attractive novel targets for immunotherapy. In this review, we describe the recent technological advances in the identification of these novel sources of neoantigens, the experimental evidence for their presentation on MHC molecules and their immunogenicity, as well as the current clinical development stage of immunotherapy targeting these neoantigens.

NT5E upregulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A novel biomarker on cancer-associated fibroblasts for predicting immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

Despite tremendous progress made in the diagnosis and managements, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) remains a global medical dilemma with dismal clinical prognosis and high mortality. Gene NT5E encodes the ecto-5’-nucleotidase (CD73), which facilitates the formation of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) permissive for tumor progression in various malignancies. Nevertheless, the cell subsets NT5E expressed on and the potential function of NT5E in the TME of HNSC remain virgin lands in HNSC. In this study, we comprehensively performed integrated prognostic analysis and elucidated that NT5E was an independent prognostic indicator for HNSC, for which a high NT5E level predicted poor overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free interval (PFI) in HNSC patients (p<0.05). Enrichment analyses revealed the close correlation between NT5E and ECM remodeling, and the latent function of NT5E may involve in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis during HNSC progression. HNSC-related immune infiltration analysis and single-cell type analysis demonstrated that NT5E expression was significantly positively associated with cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in HNSC (p<0.01). NT5E-related TME analysis revealed that NT5E-high group are characterized by low neoantigen loads (NAL, p<0.001) and tumor mutation burden (TMB, p<0.01), indicating high-NT5E-expression HNSC patients may be recalcitrant to immunotherapy. In-situ multicolor immunofluorescence staining was later conducted and the results further verified our findings. Taken together, NT5E could be a novel biomarker in HNSC. Predominantly expressed on CAFs, the upregulation of NT5E might predict an immunosuppressive TME for HNSC patients who may benefit little from immunotherapy. Targeting CAFs with high NT5E expression might be a novel therapeutic strategy for HNSC patients.

SAAL1, a novel oncogene, is associated with prognosis and immunotherapy in multiple types of cancer

Serum amyloid A-like 1 (SAAL1) was recently identified as a novel oncogene in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To explore the potential role of SAAL1 in other cancers, we conducted a pan-cancer analysis of SAAL1 expression and its association with tumor microenvironment (TME) immunological profiles, sensitivity to chemotherapy agents, response to immunotherapy, and patient prognosis. SAAL1 was overexpressed in most malignant tumors in association with poor prognosis. Moreover, its expression was positively correlated with TME-relevant immune and mismatch signatures, immunostimulatory infiltrating cells (CD4⁺ memory T cells, activated NK cells, M1 macrophages, and cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells), microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), neoantigen load, and immune checkpoint markers (PD-L1, LAG-3 and CTLA-4) in multiple cancers. SAAL1 overexpression was also associated with immunotherapy response and overall survival (OS) in bladder cancer (BLCA) patients who had received anti-PD-L1 treatment. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) further showed significant enrichment of SAAL1 in immune cell signaling, cell cycle, and cell adhesion pathways. Moreover, we detected tumor-specific correlations between SAAL1 expression and either chemoresistance or sensitivity to common chemotherapeutics. Lastly, we showed that SAAL1 silencing suppresses both malignant phenotype and expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer A549 cells in vitro. These findings suggest that SAAL1 contributes to tumorigenesis and antitumor immunity mechanisms in different cancer types, and may thus serve as both a prognostic biomarker and potential target for cancer immunotherapy.

Early mortality factors in immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising treatment, but may cause hyperprogressive disease and early death. The present study investigated early mortality factors in ICI monotherapy for lung cancer.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and treated with ICI monotherapy (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab) between March 2016 and August 2021 at National Hospital Organization Kochi Hospital and Tokushima University. Early death was defined as patients who died within 60 days of ICI treatment.

Results

A total of 166 patients were included. The majority of patients (87%) had an Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) Performance status (PS) of 0/1. There were 21 early deaths. Significant differences were observed in ECOG PS, the histological type, liver metastasis, tumor size, the white blood cell count, neutrophils (%), lymphocytes (%), the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in serum (sNLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin between the groups with or without early death. Univariate logistic regression analyses identified ECOG PS score ≥ 2, liver metastasis, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, neutrophils ≥ 69%, lymphocytes < 22%, sNLR ≥ 4, CRP ≥ 1 mg/dl, and albumin < 3.58 g/dl as significant risk factors for early death. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that liver metastasis (Odds ratio [OR], 10.3; p = 0.008), ECOG PS score ≥ 2 (OR, 8.0; p = 0.007), and a smoking history (OR, 0.1; p = 0.03) were significant risk factors for early death.

Conclusion

Liver metastases, ECOG PS score ≥ 2, and a non-smoking history are early mortality factors in ICI monotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Exploring Real World Outcomes with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (EP-NEC)

Simple Summary

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NEC) are a group of tumors which are often metastatic and characterized by poor outcomes. Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is the current front-line therapy for metastatic EP-NEC, and has been adapted from small cell lung cancer. There are limited treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant EP-NEC, with no current established second-line standard of care. Recently, there has been mixed evidence for the role of immunotherapy in EP-NEC, with limited existing prospective data. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes between patients with refractory EP-NEC who received single, dual immune check point inhibitors (ICPIs) and cytotoxic chemotherapy in the second-line setting. This real world experience suggests that utilizing ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with second-line pretreated EP-NEC may be more effective than other existing treatment options.

Abstract

Background: Dual utilization of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) nivolumab plus ipilimumab has demonstrated clinical promise in the treatment of patients with refractory high-grade neuroendocrine neo-plasms (NENs) in phase II clinical trials (DART SWOG 1609 and CA209), while single agent ICPIs have largely been ineffective for these types of tumors. While both trials demonstrated promising results in high grade NENs, there was no adequate description of the association between tumor differentiation (high-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor vs poorly-differentiated extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) and ICPI outcomes in the DART SWOG 1609 trial. Our study reports on the effectiveness and toxicity profile of dual ICPIs in a real world second-line EP-NEC patient population. Methods: Data on metastatic EP-NEC patients, treated with either ICPIs (single and dual ICPIs) or chemo-therapy in the second-line setting, were retrieved from databases of three comprehensive cancer centers. Associations between treatment characteristics and outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. Results: From 2007 to 2020, we identified 70 patients with metastatic EP-NEC (predominantly of gastro-enteropancreatic origin), of whom 42 patients (23 males, 19 females, median age 62 years old) were eligible for the final analysis. All patients were refractory to platinum etoposide doublet chemotherapy in the first-line setting. The median PFS for patients who received dual ICPIs (11 patients), single agent ICPI (8 patients), and cytotoxic chemotherapy (23 patients) was 258 days, 56.5 days, and 47 days, respectively (p = 0.0001). Median overall survival (OS) for those groups was not reached (NR), 18.7 months, and 10.5 months, respectively (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in treatment outcomes in patients according to tumor mismatch repair (MMR) or tumor mutational burden (TMB) status. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11.1% of the patients who received dual ICPIs; however, none of these AEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: In the second-line setting, patients with EP-NECs treated with dual ICPIs (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) experienced improved PFS and OS compared to patients treated with single agent ICPI or cytotoxic chemotherapy. These results echo some of the current evidence for ICPIs in grade 3 NENs and need to be validated in future prospective studies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still limited and based on early clinical trials, with no reported randomized clinical data. In this study, we reviewed the available evidence on the use of ICIs, either in monotherapy or in combination with other treatments, in different AML settings, including newly diagnosed AML, relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML and maintenance treatment after allogeneic-HSCT (allo-HSCT).

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed electronic database as primary source to identify the studies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line and R/R AML. We recorded Overall Response (ORR), Complete Response (CR) and Complete Response with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rates, overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse events ≥ grade 3 (irAEs). Hereafter, we analyzed the overall profile of these ICIs by performing a meta-analysis of the reported outcomes.

Results

A total of 13 studies were identified where ICI was used in patients with AML. ORR across these studies was 42% (IC95%, 31% - 54%) and CR/CRi was 33% (IC95%, 22%-45%). Efficacy was also assessed considering the AML setting (first-line vs. relapsed/refractory) and results pointed to higher response rates in first-line, compared to R/R. Mean overall survival was 8.9 months [median 8 months, (IC95%, 3.9 - 15.5)]. Differences between first line and R/R settings were observed, since average overall survival in first line was 12.0 months, duplicating the OS in R/R which was 7.3 months. Additionally, the most specific adverse events (AEs) of these therapies are immune-related adverse events (irAEs), derived from their inflammatory effects. Grade ≥3 irAEs rate was low and similar among studies [12% (95%CI 8% - 16%)].

Conclusion

ICIs in combination with intensive chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents or other targeted therapies are gaining interest in the management of hematological malignancies such as AML. However, results obtained from clinical trials are modest and limited by both, the type of design and the clinical trial phase. Hopefully, the prospective study of these therapies in late-stage development could help to identify patients who may benefit from ICI therapy.