Non-HLA Antibodies and Epitope Mismatches in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Histological Antibody-Mediated Rejection

THE RELATIONSHIP OF MICROVASCULAR INFLAMMATION WITH ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a key diagnostic feature of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), however recipients without donor specific antibodies (DSA) defy etiological classification using C4dptc and conventional DSA assignment. We evaluated MVI≥2 (Banff g+ptc≥2) using Banff 2019 AMR (independent of MVI≥2 but including C4dptc) with unconventional glomerular capillary (C4dglom) and arterial/endothelial (C4dart) immunoperoxidase detection, shared-eplet and subthreshold DSA (MFI 100-499), and capillary ultrastructure from 3398 kidney transplant samples for evidence of AMR. MVI≥2 (n=202 biopsies) from 149 kidneys (12.4% prevalence) correlated with DSA+, C4dptc+, C4dglom+, Banff cg, i, t, ti scores, serum creatinine, proteinuria, and graft failure compared with 202 propensity score matched normal controls. Laboratory reported DSA- MVI≥2 (MFI≥500) occurred in 34.7%, however subthreshold (28.6%), eplet-directed (51.4%), and/or misclassified anti-HLA DSA (12.9%) were identified in 67.1% by forensic reanalysis, with vascular C4d+ staining in 67.1%, and endothelial abnormalities in 57.1%, totalling 87.1%. Etiological analysis attributed 62.9% to AMR (77.8% for DSA- MVI≥2 with glomerulitis) and pure T cellular rejection is 37.1%. C4dptc-DSA- MVI≥2 was unrecognized AMR in 48.0%. Functional outcomes and graft survival were comparable to normal controls. We concluded that DSA- MVI≥2 frequently signified a mild "borderline" phenotype of AMR which was recognizable using novel serological and pathological techniques.

T-cell Mediated Rejection Associated Microvascular Inflammation in the Allograft Kidney: RNAseq Analysis Using the Banff Human Organ Transplant Gene Panel

BACKGROUND

Microvascular inflammation (MVI) can occur in biopsies showing T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), but it is not well established that T-cells can directly mediate microvascular injury (TCMR-MVI).

METHODS

This was a cross sectional RNAseq based Banff Human Organ Transplant (BHOT) gene expression (GE) analysis. The objective of this study was to probe the molecular signature of TCMR-MVI in comparison with C4d+, DSA+ antibody mediated rejection (ABMR), stable renal function (STA), and TCMR without MVI. Transcriptome analysis utilized CLC genomic workbench and R-studio software.

RESULTS

No gene set was specific for any diagnostic category, and all were expressed at low levels in STA biopsies. BHOT gene set scores could differentiate ABMR from TCMR and TCMR-MVI, but not TCMR from TCMR-MVI. TCMR-MVI underexpressed several genes associated with ABMR including DSATs, ENDAT, immunoglobulin genes, ADAMDEC1, PECAM1 and NK cell transcripts (MYBL1, GNLY), but overexpressed C3, NKBBIZ, and LTF. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the expression of these genes in TCMR-MVI versus TCMR. This indicates that the GE profile of TCMR MVI aligns more closely with TCMR than ABMR. The limitations of classifying biopsies using the binary ABMR-TCMR algorithm, and the occurrence of common pathogenesis mechanisms amongst different rejection phenotype was highlighted by the frequent presence of molecular mixed rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

T-cell mediated mechanisms play a significant role in the pathogenesis of MVI. GE was broadly different between rejection phenotypes, but molecular scores varied substantially between biopsies with the same Banff grade. It was not always possible to achieve precise molecular score-based diagnostic categorization of individual patients.

Unveiling Spatial Immune Cell Profile in Kidney Allograft Rejections Using 36-plex Immunofluorescence Imaging

BACKGROUND

Kidney allograft rejections are orchestrated by a variety of immune cells. Because of the complex histopathologic features, accurate pathological diagnosis poses challenges even for expert pathologists. The objective of this study was to unveil novel spatial indices associated with transplant rejection by using a spatial bioinformatic approach using 36-plex immunofluorescence image data.

METHODS

The image obtained from 11 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and 12 antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) samples were segmented into 753 737 single cells using DeepCell's Mesmer algorithm. These cells were categorized into 13 distinct cell types through unsupervised clustering based on their biomarker expression profiles. Cell neighborhood analysis allowed us to stratify kidney tissue into 8 distinct neighborhood components consisting of unique cell type enrichment profiles.

RESULTS

In contrast to TCMR samples, AMR samples exhibited a higher frequency of neighborhood components that were characterized by an enrichment of CD31+ endothelial cells. Although the overall frequency of CD68+ macrophages in AMR samples was not significantly high, CD68+ macrophages within endothelial cell-rich lesions exhibited a significantly higher frequency in AMR samples than TCMR samples. Furthermore, the frequency of interactions between CD31+ cells and CD68+ cells was significantly increased in AMR samples, implying the pivotal role of macrophages in AMR pathogenesis. Importantly, patients demonstrating a high frequency of CD31:CD68 interactions experienced significantly poorer outcomes in terms of chronic AMR progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these data indicate the potential of spatial bioinformatic as a valuable tool for aiding in pathological diagnosis and for uncovering new insights into the mechanisms underlying transplant rejection.

Evaluating the Clinical Relevance of Antibodies against Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen in Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the preferred modality of kidney replacement therapy for eligible patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), given that it has been found to reduce mortality rates, improve quality of life, and is cost-effective compared to dialysis. Recent advancements in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing and donor-specific antibody (DSA) detection have helped to reduce the risk of rejection, but antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) can still occur without DSA. Previous studies suggest that rejection can be attributed to antibodies against Non-Human Leucocyte Antigens (non-HLAs). We aimed to acquire further understanding of the prevalence and distribution of non-HLA antibodies in our local population and attempt to correlate these findings with graft outcomes, as well as assess whether non-HLA antibodies can be utilized to determine graft impairment and dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving kidney transplant recipients between January 2010 and December 2020. All included individuals were aged over 18 and underwent kidney-alone transplants; were ABO- and HLA-compatible; and were matched at A, B, and DR loci (mismatch 0:0:0). HLA testing was negative at the time of transplantation. The samples from both cases of early graft rejection and the control group were tested for non-HLA antibodies using One Lambda LABScreenTM, Autoantibody kit groups 1, 2, and 3, as well as the Immucor LIFECODES non-HLA autoantibody assay. Results: A total of 850 kidney transplant recipients were included, in which 12 patients experienced early graft rejection within the first month post transplant and 18 patients who did not experience graft rejection were selected as study controls. Our study reported no correlation between the total burden of non-HLA antibodies and early rejection, most likely as the result of a small sample size. Nevertheless, a sub-analysis revealed that specific high-frequency pre-transplant non-HLA antibodies such as GSTT, CXCL11, CXCL10, and HNR, detected by LIFECODES, were associated with rejection (Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.001). Most pre-transplant non-HLA antibody levels were reduced after transplantation, which was attributed to immunosuppression. Conclusion: The 'high frequency' non-HLA antibodies displayed an association with graft rejection, though the overall associations between the burden of non-HLA antibodies and rejection episodes remain inconclusive. Further work is needed to establish the rebound phenomenon of non-HLA antibodies, the development of de novo non-HLA antibodies in the long run, and their implications on graft survival.

Immune monitoring in pediatric kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, largely related to chronic rejection. Creatinine is a late marker of renal injury, and more sensitive, early markers of allograft injury are an active area of current research.

METHODS

This is an educational review summarizing existing strategies for monitoring for rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

RESULTS

We summarize supporting currently available clinical tests, including surveillance biopsy, donor specific antibodies, and donor-derived cell free DNA, as well as the potential limitations of these studies. In addition, we review the current avenues of active research, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and torque tenovirus levels.

CONCLUSION

Advancing the use of noninvasive immune monitoring will depend on well-designed multicenter trials that include patients with stable graft function, include biopsy results on all patients, and can demonstrate both association with a patient-relevant clinical endpoint such as graft survival or change in glomerular filtration rate and a potential timepoint for intervention.

Recovery from antibody-mediated biliary ductopenia and multiorgan inflammation after COVID-19 vaccination

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality. Spike messenger RNA (mRNA)-based vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may contribute to immune-mediated injuries. Here we present a case of a previously healthy 47-year-old man, who developed progressive jaundice 2 weeks after receiving his 3rd COVID-19 vaccination (1st mRNA-based vaccine). Apart from elevated serum total bilirubin levels (peaked at >70 mg/dL), deteriorating renal (blood urea nitrogen: peak, 108.5 mg/dL; creatinine: peak, 6 mg/dL) and exocrine pancreas (amylase: peak, 1717 U/L; lipase: peak, 5784 U/L) profiles were also seen. Vanishing bile duct syndrome characterized by ductopenia and cholangiocyte vacuolation, positive C4d deposition, and high titer of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody consistently explain the overall antibody-mediated pathogenesis resembling antibody-mediated "rejection" in the solid organ transplant setting. Corticosteroids and plasmapheresis were administered, leading to gradual resolution of the symptoms, and the jaundice completely resolved 2 months later. In conclusion, we reported a case of antibody-mediated multiorgan injury after an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, characterized by severe cholangiopathy. The patient recovered with corticosteroids and plasmapheresis, and long-term follow-up is necessary.

The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics

The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.

Microvascular activation and exocytosis after exposure to the serum from mismatched recipients by using donor microvascular cultures

BACKGROUND

Microvascular injury resulting from activation and exocytosis are early signs of tissue damage caused by allografting. However, humoral anti-graft reactions are not easily detectable in transplant biopsies. The aim of this study was to establish a bioassay to recapitulate this process in a prospective approach.

METHODS

The study was executed by using our previously established protocol to isolate and freeze the donors' microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) at the transplantation (34 living-related donors and 26 cadaver donors); and to collect sera from the recipients before the transplantation, one-, three- and six-months after transplantation. The activation and exocytosis of the MVEC were determined by incubating the donors' cultures with the recipients' sera. We determined if there was any endothelial activation by quantifying the releases of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in supernatants and the expressions of membrane intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD54) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD106) by flow cytometry. Endothelial exocytosis was determined by quantifying soluble E-selectin (CD62E) and cytoplasmic von Willebrand Factor (vWF) in supernatants. Endothelial activation or exocytosis was considered positive when the fold change (≧1.5) of post-transplantation to pre-transplantation was reached. We also monitored serum PRA and cytokines using Luminex multiple-plex and cytometric bead-based assay respectively.

RESULTS

We found 41.2% recipients (14 out of 34, ranging from 1.5 to 5.2 folds, p < 0.05) exhibited positive MVEC activation in the first month after transplantation as determined by IL-8 levels; 26.5% recipients (9 out of 34, ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 folds, p < 0.05) by MCP-1 levels. In the group of three months post-transplantation, 70.6% patients were positive (12 out of 17, ranging from 1.8 to 87.1 folds, p < 0.05) by IL-8 increased levels; 24% recipients (4 out of 17, ranging from 1.8 to 50.5 folds, p < 0.05) measured by MCP-1 levels. However, these changes disappeared six months after transplantation. Flow cytometric data showed that a time-dependent of CD54+ and CD106+ expressions existed over the course of six months. Most CD54+ and CD106+ cells were CD31- (platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1), though CD31+/CD106+ (37.5%, 3 out of 8) and CD31+/CD106+ (25%. 2 out of 8) were seen. When comparing donor MVEC activation to their recipient's proinflammatory cytokine levels or PRA status, we could not draw a conclusion regarding the connections between them. The sera collected from recipients at either one- or three-months after allografting did not significantly induce the release of either soluble CD62E or vWF (p > 0.05), indicating exocytosis was not significantly involved in the acute phase of allografting.

CONCLUSIONS

This bioassay enables us to detect the activation and exocytosis of donor MVEC elicited by respective sera from mismatched kidney recipients.

The impact of pretransplant suspected HLA antibody on the long-term outcome of the graft kidney: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The preoperative examination of kidney transplantation includes HLA antibody screening to initially determine the presence of preexisting donor-specific antibody (DSA) that mediates hyperacute rejection. Recipients with positive HLA antibodies require further HLA specificity analysis to type the antigen and determine the antigen mismatches between the donor and recipient. However, recipients with suspected antibodies would have no further HLA specificity analysis. It is unclear whether suspected HLA antibodies would affect renal graft function. This study aimed to explore the impact of pretransplant suspected HLA antibody on the long-term outcome of the graft kidney and thus determine the necessity of routinely performing the HLA specificity analysis in recipients with suspected HLA antibodies preoperatively.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. 179 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) were included and further divided into HLA antibody-negative group (Group 1) and HLA antibody-suspected groups (Group 2) based on the result of the pretransplant HLA antibody screen test. And the antibody-suspected group was further divided into a low-mismatched group (Group A) and a high-mismatched group (Group B) according to the HLA specificity analysis. We tracked the renal function indexes, biochemical indexes, and posttransplant adverse events within 5 years after transplantation and explored the necessity of further HLA specificity analysis in recipients with pretransplant suspected HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in demographics between HLA antibody-negative group and HLA antibody-suspected groups. At 5 years of follow-up, the KTRs in HLA antibody-negative group had significantly higher eGFR levels, lower serum creatinine levels, and less urinary protein compared to those in antibody-suspected group. Meanwhile, the KTRs in low-mismatched group also had significantly higher eGFR levels, lower serum creatinine levels, and less proteinuria compared to those in high-mismatched group. Correlation analysis showed that the age of KTRs, urinary protein levels and the load capacity of HLA mismatches were associated with eGFR levels of KTRs at 5 year posttransplant.

CONCLUSION

KTRs with suspected HLA antibodies before kidney transplantation have worse graft function than the preoperative HLA antibody-negative recipients in the long-term posttransplant follow-up. The specific load capacity of HLA mismatches, the age of the recipient and the urinary protein was found to be negatively correlated with long-term posttransplant renal outcomes. It is necessary to undergo further HLA specificity analysis for recipients with suspected HLA antibodies in HLA antibody screen test to explicit HLA mismatches and improve long-term posttransplant outcomes.

Non-HLA Antibodies to G Protein-coupled Receptors in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Short- and Long-term Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) and endothelin-type A receptor antibodies (ETAR-Abs) are G protein-coupled receptor activating autoantibodies associated with antibody-mediated rejection, vascular pathology, increased cytokines, allograft dysfunction, and allograft loss in pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the first 2 y posttransplantation. The impact of AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab positivity on longer-term 5-y transplant outcomes is unknown.

METHODS

One hundred pediatric kidney transplant recipients were tested for ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab on serially collected blood samples in the first 2 y posttransplant. Biopsies were collected per protocol and 6, 12, and 24 mo posttransplant and at any time during the 5-y follow-up period for clinical indication. Clinical outcomes, including renal dysfunction, rejection, HLA donor-specific antibodies, and allograft loss, were assessed through 5 y posttransplantation.

RESULTS

AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab were positive in 59% of patients. AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity was associated with greater declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate, and de novo AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab was associated with allograft loss in the first 2 y posttransplant. There was no association between antibody positivity and rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, or allograft loss in the first 5 y posttransplant. In a model controlled for age, sex, immunosuppression, and HLA mismatch, AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity was significantly associated with the development of HLA donor-specific antibodies at 5 y posttransplant (odds ratio 2.87, P  = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest temporally distinct clinical complications associated with AT1R-Ab or ETAR-Ab positivity in pediatric patients; these injury patterns are of significant interest for developing effective treatment strategies.

Autoantibodies from patients with kidney allograft vasculopathy stimulate a proinflammatory switch in endothelial cells and monocytes mediated via GPCR-directed PAR1-TNF-α signaling

Non-HLA-directed regulatory autoantibodies (RABs) are known to target G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and thereby contribute to kidney transplant vasculopathy and failure. However, the detailed underlying signaling mechanisms in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) and immune cells need to be clarified in more detail. In this study, we compared the immune stimulatory effects and concomitant intracellular and extracellular signaling mechanisms of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-fractions from kidney transplant patients with allograft vasculopathy (KTx-IgG), to that from patients without vasculopathy, or matched healthy controls (Con-IgG). We found that KTx-IgG from patients with vasculopathy, but not KTx-IgG from patients without vasculopathy or Con-IgG, elicits HMEC activation and subsequent upregulation and secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) from HMECs, which was amplified in the presence of the protease-activated thrombin receptor 1 (PAR1) activator thrombin, but could be omitted by selectively blocking the PAR1 receptor. The amount and activity of the TNF-α secreted by HMECs stimulated with KTx-IgG from patients with vasculopathy was sufficient to induce subsequent THP-1 monocytic cell activation. Furthermore, AP-1/c-FOS, was identified as crucial transcription factor complex controlling the KTx-IgG-induced endothelial TNF-α synthesis, and mircoRNA-let-7f-5p as a regulatory element in modulating the underlying signaling cascade. In conclusion, exposure of HMECs to KTx-IgG from patients with allograft vasculopathy, but not KTx-IgG from patients without vasculopathy or healthy Con-IgG, triggers signaling through the PAR1-AP-1/c-FOS-miRNA-let7-axis, to control TNF-α gene transcription and TNF-α-induced monocyte activation. These observations offer a greater mechanistic understanding of endothelial cells and subsequent immune cell activation in the clinical setting of transplant vasculopathy that can eventually lead to transplant failure, irrespective of alloantigen-directed responses.

Autoantibodies against DNA topoisomerase I promote renal allograft rejection by increasing alloreactive T cell responses

Antibodies reactive to self-antigens are an important component of posttransplant immune responses. The generation requirements and functions of autoantibodies, as well as the mechanisms of their influence on alloimmune responses, still remain to be determined. Our study investigated the contribution of autoimmunity during rejection of renal allografts. We have previously characterized a mouse model in which the acute rejection of a life-supporting kidney allograft is mediated by antibodies. At rejection, recipient sera screening against >4000 potential autoantigens revealed DNA topoisomerase I peptide 205-219 (TI-I205-219) as the most prominent epitope. Subsequent analysis showed TI-I205-219-reactive autoantibodies are induced in nonsensitized recipients of major histocompatibility complex-mismatched kidney allografts in a T cell-dependent manner. Immunization with TI-I205-219 broke self-tolerance, elicited TI-I205-219 immunoglobin G autoantibodies, and resulted in acute rejection of allogeneic but not syngeneic renal transplants. The graft loss was associated with increased priming of donor-reactive T cells but not with donor-specific alloantibodies elevation. Similarly, passive transfer of anti-TI-I205-219 sera following transplantation increased donor-reactive T cell activation with minimal effects on donor-specific alloantibody levels. The results identify DNA topoisomerase I as a novel self-antigen in transplant settings and demonstrate that autoantibodies enhance activation of donor-reactive T cells following renal transplantation.

Vascular and Non-HLA autoantibody profiles in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

Introduction

Severe COVID-19 illness is characterized by an overwhelming immune hyperactivation. Autoantibodies against vascular, tissue, and cytokine antigens have been detected across the spectrum of COVID-19. How these autoantibodies correlate with COVID-19 severity is not fully defined.

Methods

We performed an exploratory study to investigate the expression of vascular and non-HLA autoantibodies in 110 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 ranging from moderate to critically ill. Relationships between autoantibodies and COVID- 19 severity and clinical risk factors were examined using logistic regression analysis.

Results

There were no absolute differences in levels of expression of autoantibodies against angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) or endothelial cell proteins between COVID-19 severity groups. AT1R autoantibody expression also did not differ by age, sex, or diabetes status. Using a multiplex panel of 60 non- HLA autoantigens we did identify seven autoantibodies that differed by COVID-19 severity including myosin (myosin; p=0.02), SHC-transforming protein 3 (shc3; p=0.07), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-beta (perc; p=0.05), glial-cell derived neurotrophic factor (gdnf; p=0.07), enolase 1 (eno1; p=0.08), latrophilin-1 (lphn1; p=0.08), and collagen VI (coll6; p=0.05) with greater breadth and higher expression levels seen in less severe COVID-19.

Discussion

Overall, we found that patients hospitalized with COVID-19 demonstrate evidence of auto-reactive antibodies targeting endothelial cells, angiotensin II receptors, and numerous structural proteins including collagens. Phenotypic severity did not correlate with specific autoantibodies. This exploratory study underscores the importance of better understanding of the role of autoimmunity in COVID-19 disease and sequelae.

Investigation of Underlying Biological Association and Targets between Rejection of Renal Transplant and Renal Cancer

Background

Post-renal transplant patients have a high likelihood of developing renal cancer. However, the underlying biological mechanisms behind the development of renal cancer in post-kidney transplant patients remain to be elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the underlying biological mechanism behind the development of renal cell carcinoma in post-renal transplant patients.

Methods

Next-generation sequencing data and corresponding clinical information of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) database. The microarray data of kidney transplant patients with or without rejection response was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. In addition, statistical analysis was conducted in R software.

Results

We identified 55 upregulated genes in the transplant patients with rejection from the GEO datasets (GSE48581, GSE36059, and GSE98320). Furthermore, we conducted bioinformatics analyses, which showed that all of these genes were upregulated in ccRCC tissue. Moreover, a prognosis model was constructed based on four rejection-related genes, including PLAC8, CSTA, AIM2, and LYZ. The prognosis model showed excellent performance in prognosis prediction in a ccRCC cohort. In addition, the machine learning algorithms identified 19 rejection-related genes, including PLAC8, involved in ccRCC occurrence. Finally, the PLAC8 was selected for further research, including its clinical and biological role.

Conclusion

In all, our study provides novel insight into the transition from the rejection of renal transplant to renal cancer. Meanwhile, PLAC8 could be a potential biomarker for ccRCC diagnosis and prognosis in post-kidney transplant patients.

Case Report: Suspected Hyperacute Rejection During Living Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

We report a case of suspected hyperacute rejection during living kidney transplantation.

CASE REPORT

A 61-year-old man underwent kidney transplantation in November 2019. Before the transplantation, immunologic tests revealed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies but not donor-specific HLA antibodies. The patient was intravenously administered 500 mg of methylprednisolone (MP) and basiliximab before perioperative blood flow reperfusion. After blood flow restoration, the transplanted kidney turned bright red and then blue. Hyperacute rejection was suspected. After the intravenous administration of 500 mg of MP and 30 g of intravenous immunoglobulin, the transplanted kidney gradually changed from blue to bright red. The initial postoperative urine output was good. On the 22nd day after the renal transplantation, the patient was discharged with a serum creatinine level of 2.38 mg/dL, and the function of the transplanted kidney gradually improved.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, non-HLA antibodies may have been a cause of the hyperacute rejection, which was managed with additional perioperative therapies.

Intact Transition Epitope Mapping—Serological Inspection by Epitope EXtraction (ITEM—SIX)

Precision medicine requests accurate serological inspections to precisely stratify patients for targeted treatment. Intact transition epitope mapping analysis proved surrogate seroconversion of a model organism’s serum when spiked with a monoclonal murine anti-Ovalbumin antibody (mAb) with epitope resolution. Isolation of the IgG fraction from blood serum applied two consecutive protein precipitation steps followed by ultrafiltration and resulted in an ESI-MS analysis-ready IgG preparation. For epitope mapping by epitope extraction, the Ovalbumin antigen was digested with trypsin. After desalting, the peptide mixture was added to the ESI-MS-ready IgG preparation from mAb-spiked serum and the solution was incubated to form an immune complex between the Ovalbumin-derived epitope peptide and the anti-Ovalbumin mAb. Then, the entire mixture of proteins and peptides was directly electrosprayed. Sorting of ions in the mass spectrometer’s gas phase, dissociation of the immune complex ions by collision-induced dissociation, and recording of the epitope peptide ion that had been released from the immune complex proved the presence of the anti-Ovalbumin mAb in serum. Mass determination of the complex-released epitope peptide ion with isotope resolution is highly accurate, guaranteeing high specificity of this novel analysis approach, which is termed Intact Transition Epitope Mapping—Serological Inspections by Epitope EXtraction (ITEM—SIX).

Immunologic risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant patients by combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch is a powerful biomarker of rejection. Few studies have explored its use in assessing rejection risk in heart transplant recipients. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of HLA Epitope Mismatch Algorithm (HLA-EMMA) and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithms can improve risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Class I and II HLA genotyping were performed by next-generation sequencing on 274 recipient/donor pairs enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children (CTOTC). Using high-resolution genotypes, we performed HLA molecular mismatch analysis with HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Patients without pre-formed donor specific antibody (DSA) (n=100) were used for correlations with post-transplant DSA and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Risk cut-offs were determined for DSA and ABMR using both algorithms. HLA-EMMA cut-offs alone predict the risk of DSA and ABMR; however, if used in combination with PIRCHE-II, the population could be further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II enables more granular immunological risk stratification. Intermediate-risk cases, like low-risk cases, are at a lower risk of DSA and ABMR. This new way of risk evaluation may facilitate individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.

The IMBG Test for Evaluating the Pharmacodynamic Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients: Current Evidence and Future Applications

Immunosuppressive drugs are widely used to prevent rejection after kidney transplantation. However, the pharmacological response to a given immunosuppressant can vary markedly between individuals, with some showing poor treatment responses and/or experiencing serious side effects. There is an unmet need for diagnostic tools that allow clinicians to individually tailor immunosuppressive therapy to a patient’s immunological profile. The Immunobiogram (IMBG) is a novel blood-based in vitro diagnostic test that provides a pharmacodynamic readout of the immune response of individual patients to a range of immunosuppressants commonly used in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we discuss the current approaches used to measure the pharmacodynamic responses of individual patients to specific immunosuppressive drugs in vitro, which can then be correlated with patient’s clinical outcomes. We also describe the procedure of the IMBG assay, and summarize the results obtained using the IMBG in different kidney transplant populations. Finally, we outline future directions and other novel applications of the IMBG, both in kidney transplant patients and other autoimmune diseases.

Double Pretransplant Positivity for Autoantibodies to LG3 and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Is Associated With Alloimmune Vascular Injury in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Both angiotensin II receptor autoantibodies (ATRabs) and autoantibodies to LG3 have been linked to kidney graft rejection with alloimmune vascular injury (AVI). We aimed to examine whether positivity for both anti-LG3 and ATRabs is associated with rejection with AVI in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study including consecutive kidney transplant recipients between 2013 and 2017 at a single center. The primary outcome was acute rejection with AVI (Banff grade 2 or 3 T-cell-mediated rejection and/or antibody-mediated rejection) in the first 3 mo posttransplant. The secondary outcome was death-censored allograft loss. The independent variables, anti-LG3 and ATRab, were measured pretransplant.

Results

Among the 328 study participants, 68 experienced acute rejection with AVI and 23 experienced graft loss over a median follow-up of 4.5 y. In a multivariable model, double pretransplant positivity for anti-LG3/ATRab was associated with acute rejection with AVI (odds ratio: 2.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-7.05). We did not observe an association between double positivity for anti-LG3/ATRab and death-censored graft loss.

Conclusions

Double positivity for anti-LG3/ATRabs pretransplant is associated with a higher risk of acute rejection with AVI. Whether therapies that remove antibodies could decrease that risk remains to be studied.Supplemental Visual Abtract: http://links.lww.com/TXD/A494.

Alloimmune risk assessment for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: A practical proposal

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although an improvement in graft survival has been observed in the last decades with the use of different immunosuppressive drugs, this is still limited in time with antibody-mediated rejection being a main cause of graft-loss. Immune monitoring and risk assessment of antibody-mediated rejection before and after kidney transplantation with useful biomarkers is key to tailoring treatments to achieve the best outcomes. Here, we provide a review of the rationale and several accessible tools for immune monitoring, from the most classic to the modern ones. Finally, we end up discussing a practical proposal for alloimmune risk assessment in kidney transplantation, including histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antibodies, HLA molecular mismatch analysis and characterization of peripheral blood immune cells.

Novel Flow Cytometry-Based Method for Detection of Anti-HLA Complement Activating Donor-Specific Antibodies in Renal Transplant Recipients and Its Comparison With Other Conventional Detection Methods

BACKGROUND

Presence of preformed donor specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC-XM) is a strong contraindication for transplant. However, it has limitations including its sensitivity and its inability to distinguish between HLA-specific and other non-HLA-specific antibodies. In this study, we standardized CDC-XM by flow cytometry and determined its relevance by comparing its results with other methods of DSA detection, such as routine CDC-XM, antibody binding assay by flow cytometry (FC-XM), and Luminex-based crossmatch assays, such as Luminex crossmatch (LXM) and virtual crossmatch (VXM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 79 serum samples were tested for DSAs by the flow cytometric complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch assay (FC-CDC-XM) and then the results of FC-CDC-XM were compared with other detection methods such as CDC-XM, FC-XM, LXM, and VXM.

RESULTS

We found that the FC-CDC-XM assay is more sensitive than routine CDC-XM. Out of total 79 sera, 24 sera were detected positive (T cells positive: 1 case and B cells positive: 23) by FC-CDC-XM as compared with 3 sera using CDC-XM; these 3 sera also showed positivity by FC-CDC-XM. After FC-XM assay, 23 samples were positive by FC-XM and out of these 23 samples, 13 were also positive by FC-CDC-XM. On comparing the FC-CDC-XM results with VXM and LXM, 10 sera of 24 FC-CDC-XM positive had HLA class II antibodies detected on a Luminex platform.

CONCLUSIONS

The FC-CDC-XM is a more sensitive and specific method for detection of HLA-specific complement-fixing antibodies than CDC-XM and FC-XM. FC-CDC-XM should be used in tissue-typing laboratories after intra- and inter- laboratory validation.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

Pre-transplant angiotensin II receptor type I antibodies in pediatric renal transplant recipients: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) in pediatric renal transplantation is unclear. Here, we evaluated pre-transplant AT1R-Ab on transplant outcomes in the first 5 years. Secondary analysis compared pre-transplant AT1R-Ab levels by age.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients, 2-20 years old, were divided into two groups: pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- (<17 U/ml; n = 18) and pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (≥17 U/ml; n = 18). eGFR was determined at 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 4-year post-transplant. Allograft biopsies were performed in the setting of strong HLA-DSA (MFI > 10 000), AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml, and/or elevated creatinine.

RESULTS

Mean age in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- was 13.3 years vs. 11.0 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab+ (p = 0.16). At 6 months, mean eGFR was 111.3 ml/min/1.73 m² in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab- vs. 100.2 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + at 1 year, 103.6 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 100.5; at 2 years, 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. and 93.7; at 4 years, 72.6 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 80.9. 11/36 patients had acute rejection (6 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab-, 5 in pre-transplant AT1R-Ab + ). There was no difference in rejection rates. All 6 subjects with de novo HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml at the time of biopsy experienced rejection. Mean age in those with the AT1R-Ab ≥40 U/ml was 10.0 years vs. 13.2 in those <40 U/ml (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In our small cohort, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab ≥17 U/ml was not associated with reduced graft function or rejection. The pathogenicity of pre-transplant AT1R-Ab in pediatric kidney transplantation requires further investigation.

Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Role in Highly Sensitized Patients

BACKGROUND

The role of non-HLA antibody is gaining special attention in solid-organ transplantation and in highly sensitized (HS) patients because of its potential involvement in graft loss (GL) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The identification of non-HLA antibodies while listed may provide deeper information about the increased immunologic risk prior to transplant. We aimed to identify non-HLA antibodies pretransplant that could involve GL in HS patients.

METHODS

Nineteen pretransplant samples from HS patients who underwent transplant at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital were studied for both HLA antibodies and a panel of 39 non-HLA antigens analyzed based on Luminex platform.

RESULTS

Eleven patient (57.9%) maintained the graft (KT group), whereas 8 (42.1%) had a GL within a median of 30 days. The median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the 39 non-HLA antigens were compared within the groups, obtaining a statistically significant differences in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (P < .04) with a MFI mean of 1408 vs 4931 for KT and GL groups, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in non-HLA MFI between ABMR and non-ABMR KT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of non-HLA antibodies in HS is high. The levels of anti-protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N before transplant could indicate a potential risk of GL, although longitudinal studies with large number of cases are needed to define anti-non-HLA profiles of risk of ABMR.

Molecular diagnosis of ABMR with or without donor-specific antibody in kidney transplant biopsies: Differences in timing and intensity but similar mechanisms and outcomes

We studied the clinical, histologic, and molecular features distinguishing DSA-negative from DSA-positive molecularly defined antibody-mediated rejection (mABMR). We analyzed mABMR biopsies with available DSA assessments from the INTERCOMEX study: 148 DSA-negative versus 248 DSA-positive, compared with 864 no rejection (excluding TCMR and Mixed). DSA-positivity varied with mABMR stage: early-stage (EABMR) 56%; fully developed (FABMR) 70%; and late-stage (LABMR) 58%. DSA-negative patients with mABMR were usually sensitized, 60% being HLA antibody-positive. Compared with DSA-positive mABMR, DSA-negative mABMR was more often C4d-negative; earlier by 1.5 years (average 2.4 vs. 3.9 years); and had lower ABMR activity and earlier stage in molecular and histology features. However, the top ABMR-associated transcripts were identical in DSA-negative versus DSA-positive mABMR, for example, NK-associated (e.g., KLRD1 and GZMB) and IFNG-inducible (e.g., PLA1A). Genome-wide class comparison between DSA-negative and DSA-positive mABMR showed no significant differences in transcript expression except those related to lower intensity and earlier time of DSA-negative ABMR. Three-year graft loss in DSA-negative mABMR was the same as DSA-positive mABMR, even after adjusting for ABMR stage. Thus, compared with DSA-positive mABMR, DSA-negative mABMR is on average earlier, less active, and more often C4d-negative but has similar graft loss, and genome-wide analysis suggests that it involves the same mechanisms. SUMMARY SENTENCE: In 398 kidney transplant biopsies with molecular antibody-mediated rejection, the 150 DSA-negative cases are earlier, less intense, and mostly C4d-negative, but use identical molecular mechanisms and have the same risk of graft loss as the 248 DSA-positive cases.

Renal Endothelial Cytotoxicity Assay to Diagnose and Monitor Renal Transplant Recipients for Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Tissue-specific nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens can play crucial roles in allograft immunity and have been shown to trigger humoral responses leading to rejection of HLA-matched kidney allografts. Interest in the role of endothelial-specific antigens has grown over the past years, and several case reports have been described in which antibodies reacting with endothelial cells (ECs) are associated with rejection. Such antibodies escape the detection in conventional crossmatch tests as they do not react with lymphocytes. However, due to the heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds, it remains difficult to draw organ-specific conclusions from studies describing endothelial crossmatch assays. We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient whose kidney allograft was rejected as hyperacute, despite the absence of pretransplant HLA-specific antibodies. To place findings from previous studies in a kidney-related context, we performed crossmatch assays with primary renal endothelial cells. The patient's serum was reactive with primary renal ECs, demonstrated by antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Antibodies from this patient did not react with lymphocytes nor were HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) found. Two years later, the patient successfully received a second kidney transplant after treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis before and after transplantation. We demonstrated that the removal of antibodies against non-HLA EC-specific molecules can be monitored using a primary renal EC crossmatch test, possibly contributing to a successful transplantation outcome.

Antigen and Cell-Based Assays for the Detection of Non-HLA Antibodies

To date, human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been the major focus in the approach to acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMBR) in solid-organ transplantation. However, evidence from the clinic and published studies has shown that non-HLA antibodies, particularly anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs), are found either in the context of AMBR or synergistically in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Numerous studies have explored the influence of AECAs on clinical outcomes, yet the determination of the exact clinical relevance of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation is not fully established. This is due to highly heterogeneous study designs including differences in testing methods and outcome measures. Efforts to develop reliable and sensitive diagnostic non-HLA antibody tests are continuously made. This is essential considering the technical difficulties of non-HLA antibody assays and the large variation in reported incidences of antibodies. In addition, it is important to take donor specificity into account in order to draw clinically relevant conclusions from non-HLA antibody assays. Here, we provide an overview of non-HLA solid-phase and cell-based crossmatch assays for use in solid-organ transplantation that are currently available, either in a research setting or commercially.

The Pre-Transplant Non-HLA Antibody Burden Associates With the Development of Histology of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

Background

Many kidney allografts fail due to the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), related to donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA). However, the histology of ABMR can also be observed in patients without HLA-DSA. While some non-HLA antibodies have been related to the histology of ABMR, it is not well known to what extent they contribute to kidney allograft injury. Here we aimed to investigate the role of 82 different non-HLA antibodies in the occurrence of histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation.

Methods

We included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2004-2013 in a single center and had biobanked serum. Pre- and post-transplant sera (n=2870) were retrospectively tested for the presence of 82 different non-HLA antibodies using a prototype bead assay on Luminex (Immucor, Inc). A ratio was calculated between the measured MFI value and the cut-off MFI defined by the vendor for each non-HLA target.

Results

874 patients had available pretransplant sera and were included in this analysis. Of them, 133 (15.2%) received a repeat kidney allograft, and 100 (11.4%) had pretransplant HLA-DSA. In total, 204 (23.3%) patients developed histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation. In 79 patients (38.7%) the histology of ABMR was explained by pretransplant or de novo HLA-DSA. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed that only the broadly non-HLA sensitized (number of positive non-HLA antibodies) patients and those with the highest total strength of the non-HLA antibodies (total ratios of the positive non-HLA antibodies) were independently associated with increased rates of histology of ABMR after transplantation. Additionally, independent associations were found for antibodies against TUBB (HR=2.40; 95% CI 1.37 – 4.21, p=0.002), Collagen III (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.08 – 2.58, p=0.02), VCL (HR=2.04; 95% CI 1.12 – 3.71, p=0.02) and STAT6 (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.01 – 2.15, p=0.04). The overall posttransplant non-HLA autoreactivity was not associated with increased rates of ABMRh.

Conclusions

This study shows that patients highly and broadly sensitized against non-HLA targets are associated with an increased risk of ABMR histology after kidney transplantations in the absence of HLA-DSA. Also, some pretransplant non‐HLA autoantibodies are individually associated with increased rates of ABMR histology. However, whether these associations are clinically relevant and represent causality, warrants further studies.

Donor–Recipient Non-HLA Variants, Mismatches and Renal Allograft Outcomes: Evolving Paradigms

Despite significant improvement in the rates of acute allograft rejection, proportionate improvements in kidney allograft longevity have not been realized, and are a source of intense research efforts. Emerging translational data and natural history studies suggest a role for anti-donor immune mechanisms in a majority of cases of allograft loss without patient death, even when overt evidence of acute rejection is not identified. At the level of the donor and recipient genome, differences in highly polymorphic HLA genes are routinely evaluated between donor and recipient pairs as part of organ allocation process, and utilized for patient-tailored induction and maintenance immunosuppression. However, a growing body of data have characterized specific variants in donor and recipient genes, outside of HLA loci, that induce phenotypic changes in donor organs or the recipient immune system, impacting transplant outcomes. Newer mechanisms for “mismatches” in these non-HLA loci have also been proposed during donor–recipient genome interactions with transplantation. Here, we review important recent data evaluating the role of non-HLA genetic loci and genome-wide donor-recipient mismatches in kidney allograft outcomes.

Differential Treatment Effects for Renal Transplant Recipients With DSA-Positive or DSA-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Background

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the main cause of renal allograft loss. The most common treatment strategy is based on plasmapheresis plus the subsequent administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Unfortunately, no approved long-term therapy is available for ABMR. The current study was designed to analyze the effect of various ABMR treatment approaches on allograft survival and to compare treatment effects in the presence or absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs).

Methods

This single-center study retrospectively analyzed 102 renal allograft recipients who had biopsy-proven ABMR after transplant. DSA was detectable in 61 of the 102 patients. Initial standard treatment of ABMR consisted of plasmapheresis (PS) or immunoadsorption (IA), followed by a single course of IVIG. In case of nonresponse or recurrence, additional immunosuppressive medications, such as rituximab, bortezomib, thymoglobulin, or eculizumab, were administered. In a second step, persistent ABMR was treated with increased maintenance immunosuppression, long-term therapy with IVIG (more than 1 year), or both.

Results

Overall graft survival among transplant patients with ABMR was <50% after 3 years of follow-up. Compared to the use of PS/IA and IVIG alone, the use of additional immunosuppressive medications had no beneficial effect on allograft survival (p = 0.83). Remarkably, allografts survival rates were comparable between patients treated with the combination of PS/IA and IVIG and those treated with a single administration of IVIG (p = 0.18). Renal transplant patients with ABMR but without DSAs benefited more from increased maintenance immunosuppression than did DSA-positive patients with ABMR (p = 0.01). Recipients with DSA-positive ABMR exhibited significantly better allograft survival after long-term application of IVIG for more than 1 year than did recipients with DSA-negative ABMR (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The results of our single-center cohort study involving kidney transplant recipients with ABMR suggest that long-term application of IVIG is more favorable for DSA-positive recipients, whereas intensification of maintenance immunosuppression is more effective for recipients with DSA-negative ABMR.

Validation and clinical outcome in assessing donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring insights of kidney allografts with longitudinal surveillance (ADMIRAL) study

The use of routine monitoring of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) after kidney transplant may allow clinicians to identify subclinical allograft injury and intervene prior to development of clinically evident graft injury. To evaluate this, data from 1092 kidney transplant recipients monitored for dd-cfDNA over a three year period was analyzed to assess the association of dd-cfDNA with histologic evidence of allograft rejection. Elevation of dd-cfDNA (0.5% or more) was significantly correlated with clinical and subclinical allograft rejection. dd-cfDNA values of 0.5% or more were associated with a nearly three-fold increase in risk development of de novo donor specific antibodies (hazard ratio 2.71) and were determined to be elevated a median of 91 days (inter quartile range of 30-125 days) ahead of donor specific antibody identification. Persistently elevated dd-cfDNA (more than one result above the 0.5% threshold) predicted over a 25% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate over three years (hazard ratio 1.97). Therefore, routine monitoring of dd-cfDNA allowed early identification of clinically important graft injury. Biomarker monitoring complemented histology and traditional laboratory surveillance strategies as a prognostic marker and risk-stratification tool post-transplant. Thus, persistently low dd-cfDNA levels may accurately identify allograft quiescence, or absence of injury, paving the way for personalization of immunosuppression trials.

The Summarized Assessment of Endothelin A Receptor Expression in Renal Transplant Compartments Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The occurrence of anti-endothelin A receptor antibodies may be useful in diagnosis of transplant damage. We noticed that the presence of the endothelin A receptor (ETA receptor) in biopsy compartments is yet to be defined. We decided therefore to analysed the presence and relevance of the ETA receptor in biopsy to define the cause. Our study aims to evaluate the expression of ETA receptors in renal recipients after a biopsy due to the worsening of transplant function.

METHODS

The expression of ETA receptors was analyzed in renal transplant biopsies using the immunohistochemical method. The evaluation of ETA receptors was performed on paraffin sections. ETA receptor expression was analyzed in four compartments of renal transplant biopsies: glomeruli; vessels; tubular epithelium; and interstitium. The assessment was presented using a three-step scale (0: lack of expression; 1: mild to moderate immunoreactivity; 2: high expression). The results of each compartment from a single biopsy were summarized and assessed in the context of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

RESULTS

We analyzed 156 patients who had a renal allograft biopsy after renal transplantation. For each patient, we created a summarized ETA receptor expression score. The summarized ETA receptor expression score analysis showed statistically significant differences in patients with and without AMR. In addition, we noticed that patients with AMR had a significantly higher mean summarized expression of ETA receptor score of 3.28 ± 1.56 compared to patients who had a biopsy for other reasons with a mean summarized ETA receptor expression score of 1.47 ± 1.35 (p < 0.000001). ROC analysis of the ETA receptor expression score for detecting AMR status showed that the most appropriate cut-off for the test of the chosen binary classifier is between 2 and 3 of the summarized ETA receptor expression score.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of endothelin A receptors in renal transplant compartments may be associated with antibody-mediated rejection. The positive ETA receptor staining might be a vital feature in the diagnosis of damage in AMR. The summarized ETA receptor expression score seems to be an exciting diagnostic tool in transplant injury assessment.

Immunosuppression as a Risk Factor for De Novo Angiotensin II Type Receptor Antibodies Development after Kidney Transplantation

(1) Background: Angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) represent a topic of interest in kidney transplantation (KT). Data regarding the risk factors associated with de novo AT1R-Ab development are lacking. Our goal was to identify the incidence of de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT and to evaluate the risk factors associated with their formation. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 56 adult patients, transplanted between 2018 and 2019. Recipient, donor, transplant, treatment, and complications data were assessed. A threshold of >10 U/mL was used for AT1R-Ab detection. (3) Results: De novo AT1R-Ab were observed in 12 out of 56 KT recipients (21.4%). The median value AT1R-Ab in the study cohort was 8.5 U/mL (inter quartile range: 6.8–10.4) and 15.6 U/mL (10.8–19.8) in the positive group. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (OR = 7.20, 95% CI: 1.30–39.65, p = 0.02), maintenance immunosuppression with immediate-release tacrolimus (OR = 6.20, 95% CI: 1.16–41.51, p = 0.03), and mean tacrolimus trough level (OR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14–4.85, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for de novo AT1R-Ab at 1 year after KT. (4) Conclusions: De novo AT1R-Ab development at 1 year after KT is significantly influenced by the type of induction and maintenance immunosuppression.