Validation of the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis in Chinese Patients

Evaluation of the clinical assessment scale for autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) in a retrospective cohort and a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) poses significant challenges in clinical management, requiring effective monitoring tools for therapeutic success and relapse detection. This study aims to assess the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) as compared to the modified Rankin scale (mRS) in evaluating AE patients and to determine the real-world adoption of the CASE score.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 20 AE patients, assessing clinical data including symptomatology, diagnostic findings, and therapeutic regimens. Furthermore, we performed a systematic review on the test performance criteria and the real-world use of the CASE score.

RESULTS

The CASE score showed a higher sensitivity in detecting clinical changes compared to the mRS, with a significant correlation between the two scales throughout the disease course (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). A systematic review of 150 articles revealed widespread adoption of the CASE score, especially in Asian populations, demonstrating high reliability and internal consistency.

DISCUSSION

Despite limitations such as retrospective design and small sample size, our findings underscore the CASE score's utility in both clinical practice and research settings. The CASE score emerges as a valuable tool for monitoring AE patients, offering improved sensitivity over existing scales like the mRS. Further validation studies in diverse populations are warranted to establish its broader applicability and inform future therapeutic interventions.

Predicting the future of autoimmune encephalitides

The concept that many neurologic and psychiatric disorders of unknown cause are immune-mediated has evolved fast during the past 20 years. The main contribution to the expansion of this field has been the discovery of antibodies that attack neuronal or glial cell-surface proteins or receptors, directly modifying their structure and function. These antibodies facilitate the diagnosis and prompt treatment of patients who often improve with immunotherapy. The identification of this group of diseases, collectively named "autoimmune encephalitides", was preceded by many years of investigations on other autoimmune CNS disorders in which the antibodies are against intracellular proteins, occur more frequently with cancer, and associate with cytotoxic T-cell responses that are less responsive to immunotherapy. Here, we first trace the recent history of the autoimmune encephalitides and address how to assess the clinical value and implement in our practice the rapid pace of autoantibody discovery. In addition, we review recent developments in the post-acute stage of the two main autoimmune encephalitides (NMDAR and LGI1) focusing on symptoms that are frequently overlooked or missed, and therefore undertreated. Because a better understanding of the pathophysiology of these diseases relies on animal models, we examine currently available studies, recognizing the existing needs for better and all-inclusive neuro-immunobiological models. Finally, we assess the status of biomarkers of disease outcome, clinical scales, current treatment strategies, and emerging therapies including CAR T-cell technology. Altogether, this overview is intended to identify gaps of knowledge and provide suggestions for improvement and insights for future research.

Olanzapine vs. magnesium valproate vs. lamotrigine in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the impact of olanzapine, magnesium valproate, and lamotrigine as adjunctive treatments for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. And it is expected to add supporting points related to the rebalance of neurotransmitters in the brain through adjuvant therapy in the clinical management of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who received standardized immunotherapy at Hunan Brain Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Compared to the olanzapine group, both the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups showed lower scores on the positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS) total score after 3 weeks of treatment (all P < 0.05). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) scores in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups were significantly higher than in the olanzapine group after 3 weeks and 3 months of treatment (all P < 0.05). After 3 months of treatment, the proportions of patients with a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 0-1 in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups were significantly higher than in the olanzapine group (all P < 0.05). The electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormality ranks at 3 months were significantly lower in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups compared with the olanzapine group (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Glx/Cr ratio significantly decreased after 3 months of treatment (all P < 0.05) in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups, while the Glx/Cr ratio in the olanzapine group showed no significant change (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with olanzapine, the addition of magnesium valproate or lamotrigine to immunotherapy might be associated with a lower PANSS score, higher MoCA score, and lower mRS score. The improvement of neurological functions and cognitive function may be related to the decreased Glx/Cr ratio.

Assessment of long-term psychosocial outcomes in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis - the SAPIENCE study protocol

BACKGROUND

N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a rare neurological autoimmune disease with severe neuropsychiatric symptoms during the acute phase. Despite good functional neurological recovery, most patients continue to experience cognitive, psychiatric, psychological, and social impairments years after the acute phase. However, the precise nature and evolving patterns over time of these long-term consequences remain unclear, and their implications for the well-being and quality of life of predominantly young patients have yet to be thoroughly examined.

METHODS

SAPIENCE is a European multi-center (n = 3) prospective observational cohort study studying the long-term cognitive, psychiatric, psychological, and social outcome in patients with NMDAR encephalitis. The study consists of three interconnected levels. Level 1 comprises a qualitative interview and focus groups with patients and their caregivers. Level 2 consists of a condensed form of the interview, standardized questionnaires, and a detailed neuropsychological examination of patients. Level 3 involves an online survey that will be open to patients world-wide and explores patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), and patient-reported experiences (PREMs) in association with clinical and cognitive outcomes. Levels 1 to 3 will progressively contribute developing of structured interviews, survey questions, and treatment guidelines by informing one another.

DISCUSSION

SAPIENCE is an in-depth study of the long-term effects of NMDAR encephalitis and bridges the gap between standardized assessments and individual patient experiences, intending to improve patient care and to increase awareness of the psychosocial long-term consequences of the disease. Through collaboration of experts in clinical neurology and social and health psychology across Europe, SAPIENCE aims to create online assessment tools and formulate guidelines for patient-centered post-acute care that will help enhance the quality of life for patients and caregivers.

Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in pediatric autoimmune encephalitis: a multicenter study

Introduction

The last few decades have increased our understanding of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). In both the pediatric and adult populations, it proves to be a disease of dramatic acute onset of heterogeneous clinical manifestations, notably encephalopathy with neuropsychiatric symptoms, seizures, and extrapyramidal symptoms. More often, it is triggered by a viral infection in the pediatric age groups, as suggested by the preceding febrile symptoms in over half of cases, and more ostensibly, NMDAR encephalitis post herpes encephalitis. An underlying neoplasm may be present in certain types (i.e., NMDAR encephalitis). The rising rate of antibody detection and subsequent confirmation has been boosted by improved live cellular assay detection methods. The corresponding clinical phenotypes, common underlying malignancies, and histopathological findings have helped improve our management regarding intervention and choice of immunotherapy. New assessment tools such as the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE score) have helped improve the objective assessment of impact on cognitive functions (1). Early intervention with immunotherapy (and tumor removal in proven underlying neoplasms) has improved overall outcomes in most presenting patients. But nearly 40% of cases fail to respond to the first tier of treatment (2). The complex interplay between pathogenic autoantibodies, T-cells, B-cells, and cytokines has led to the emergence of additional immunotherapy agents (i.e., tocilizumab and bortezomib).

Methods

In this retrospective observational study of pediatric AE conducted at two tertiary care centers, we observed the clinical characteristics, autoantibody yield, treatment modalities used, and disability scores during presentation and follow-up. Our secondary aim was to delineate prognostic factors for poor outcomes.

Results

Neuropsychiatric symptoms, encephalopathy, and seizures were the predominant manifestations in most of our patients. Younger age groups, refractory seizures, profound encephalopathy, and refractory disease harbored higher disability scores. The group that received combined immunotherapy has shown mitigation of disability score from severe to mild during long-term follow-up, signifying the role of multifaceted immunotherapy in pediatric refractory AE.

Conclusion

Early implementation of combined immunotherapy in refractory cases significantly improved longterm disability scores, in spite of lingering residual effects on neurologic functions, notably cognition, behavior, and speech.

Brazilian consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune encephalitis in the adult and pediatric populations

BACKGROUND

 Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) is a group of inflammatory diseases characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal and glial antigens, leading to subacute psychiatric symptoms, memory complaints, and movement disorders. The patients are predominantly young, and delays in treatment are associated with worse prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

 With the support of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, ABN) and the Brazilian Society of Child Neurology (Sociedade Brasileira de Neurologia Infantil, SBNI), a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of AIE in Brazil was developed using the Delphi method.

METHODS

 A total of 25 panelists, including adult and child neurologists, participated in the study.

RESULTS

 The panelists agreed that patients fulfilling criteria for possible AIE should be screened for antineuronal antibodies in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the tissue-based assay (TBA) and cell-based assay (CBA) techniques. Children should also be screened for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glucoprotein antibodies (anti-MOG). Treatment should be started within the first 4 weeks of symptoms. The first-line option is methylprednisolone plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis, the second-line includes rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide, while third-line treatment options are bortezomib and tocilizumab. Most seizures in AIE are symptomatic, and antiseizure medications may be weaned after the acute stage. In anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis, the panelists have agreed that oral immunosuppressant agents should not be used. Patients should be evaluated at the acute and postacute stages using functional and cognitive scales, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE).

CONCLUSION

 The present study provides tangible evidence for the effective management of AIE patients within the Brazilian healthcare system.

Study on clinical features and factors related to long-term outcomes of antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the clinical characteristics of antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and to investigate factors associated with long-term outcomes among antibody-negative AE.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with antibody-negative AE were recruited from January 2016 to December 2022 at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The study assessed the long-term outcomes of antibody-negative AE using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Predictors influencing long-term outcomes were subsequently analyzed. External validation of RAPID scores (refractory status epilepticus [RSE], age of onset ≥60 years, ANPRA [antibody-negative probable autoimmune encephalitis], infratentorial involvement, and delay of immunotherapy ≥1 month) was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 100 (47 females and 53 males) antibody-negative AE patients were enrolled in this study, with approximately 49 (49%) experiencing unfavorable long-term outcomes (mRS scores ≥3). Antibody-negative AE was subcategorized into ANPRA, autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Psychiatric symptoms were prevalent in LE and ANPRA subtypes, while weakness and gait instability/dystonia were predominant in the ADEM subtype. Higher peak CASE scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.846, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.163-2.930, p = 0.009) and initiating immunotherapy within 30 days (OR 0.210, 95% CI: 0.046-0.948, p = 0.042) were correlated with long-term outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis returned that the RAPID scores cutoff of 1.5 best discriminated the group with poor long-term outcomes (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 56.9%).

INTERPRETATION

The ANPRA subtype exhibited poorer long-term outcomes compared to LE and ADEM subtypes, and early immunotherapy was crucial for improving long-term outcomes in antibody-negative AE. The use of RAPID scoring could aid in guiding clinical decision making.

Predictors of mortality and poor outcome for patients with severe infectious encephalitis in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

There are few thorough studies assessing predictors of severe encephalitis, despite the poor prognosis and high mortality associated with severe encephalitis. The study aims to evaluate the clinical predictors of mortality and poor outcomes at hospital discharge in patients with severe infectious encephalitis in intensive care units.

METHOD

In two Chinese hospitals, a retrospective cohort study comprising 209 patients in intensive care units suffering from severe infectious encephalitis was carried out. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors predicting mortality in all patients and poor outcomes in all survivors with severe infectious encephalitis.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 209 patients with severe encephalitis, 22 patients died, yielding a mortality rate of 10.5%. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure ≥ 400mmH2O (OR = 7.43), abnormal imaging (OR = 3.51), abnormal electroencephalogram (OR = 7.14), and number of rescues (OR = 1.12) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality in severe infectious encephalitis patients. Among the 187 survivors, 122 (65.2%) had favorable outcomes, defined as the modified Rankine Scale (mRS) score (0 ~ 3), and 65(34.8%) had poor outcomes (mRS scores 4 ~ 5). Age (OR = 1.02), number of rescues (OR = 1.43), and tubercular infection (OR = 10.77) were independent factors associated with poor outcomes at discharge in all survivors with severe infectious encephalitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple clinical, radiologic, and electrophysiological variables are independent predictive indicators for mortality and poor outcomes in patients with severe encephalitis in intensive care units. Identifying these outcome predictors early in patients with severe encephalitis may enable the implementation of appropriate medical treatment and help reduce mortality rates.

CSF Findings in Chinese Patients with NMDAR, LGI1 and GABABR Antibody-Associated Encephalitis

Purpose

CSF inflammation in subtypes of antibody-defined autoimmune encephalitis (AE) ranges in intensity from moderate to severe. In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, we characterized CSF findings in Chinese patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (NMDAR-E), anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 encephalitis (LGI1-E), and anti-gamma aminobutyric acid-B receptor encephalitis (GABABR-E).

Patients and Methods

The AE cases, including 102 NMDAR-E, 68 LGI1-E and 15 GABABR-E, were included. CSF inflammatory parameters consisted primarily of CSF leukocytes, oligoclonal bands (OCBs), and CSF/serum albumin ratios (QAlb). Ten serum cytokines were evaluated in order to classify AE subtypes.

Results

88% of NMDAR-E, 80% of GABABR-E, and 51% of LGI1-E patients had aberrant CSF features. In NMDAR-E, the CSF leukocyte count, CSF protein concentration, and age-adjusted QAlb were significantly higher than in LGI1-E, but did not differ from GABABR-E. Blood-CSF barrier dysfunction was less common in NMDAR-E patients with >40 years old. On admission, inflammatory CSF response was more prevalent in NMDAR-E patients with a higher CASE score. With age <60 years, CSF inflammatory changes were less frequent in LGI1-E patients, but more common in GABABR-E patients. MCP-1, IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-4 were potential classifiers for NMDAR-E, LGI1-E, and GABABR-E, and correlated substantially with CSF leukocyte count and QAlb.

Conclusion

Subtype-specific patterns are formed by the various inflammatory CSF parameters in NMDAR-E, LGI1-E, and GABABR-E, and their correlation with disease severity, age, and disease duration. CSF inflammatory characteristics associated with MCP-1, IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-4 may be potential immunopathogeneses targeting markers for these AE subtypes.

Longitudinal Disability, Cognitive Impairment, and Mood Symptoms in Patients With Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Longitudinal outcomes in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARe) are still not fully understood and may not be adequately captured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), often the sole reported outcome. We aim to characterize longitudinal outcomes in anti-NMDARe using multiple outcome measures.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study examined outcome measures (mRS and Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis [CASE]) in adults with NMDA receptor-IgG in CSF at short- and long-term follow-ups using linear and logistic regression modeling. Patients with evaluations for cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment/Mini-Mental State Examination), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7) >6 months from symptom onset were correlated with final CASE scores.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (76% female, median disease onset age = 28 years, range = 1-75 years) were included. The majority received first-line immunosuppressants (97%) at a median of 3.9 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.1-9.7) from symptom onset and 68% received second-line therapies. At baseline, median/mean mRS and CASE were 4 (IQR = 3-5) and 12.9 (SD = 7.2), respectively. At short-term follow-up (median = 10 weeks, IQR = 6-17), factors associated with higher CASE and mRS included dysautonomia, coma/lethargy, seizures/status epilepticus, and intensive care unit admission (p < 0.05). At long-term follow-up (median = 70 weeks, IQR = 51-174), median/mean mRS and CASE were 2 (IQR = 1-3) and 4.4 (SD = 4.2), respectively. Only weakness at symptom onset predicted higher mRS scores (odds ratio = 5.6, 95% confidence interval 1.02-30.9, p = 0.047). Despite both mRS and CASE improving from baseline (p < 0.001), only 9 patients (31%) returned to their premorbid function. Among patients with cognitive and mood evaluations >6 months from onset, moderate-severe cognitive impairment (42%), depression (28%), and anxiety (30%) were frequent. Cognitive and depression measures were associated with final CASE subscores (including memory, language, weakness, and psychiatric).

DISCUSSION

Multiple clinical factors influenced short-term outcomes, but only onset weakness influenced long-term mRS, highlighting that mRS is predominantly affected by global motor function. Although mRS and CASE improved over time for most patients, these outcome measures did not capture the full extent of long-term functional impairment in terms of mood, cognition, and the ability to return to premorbid function. This emphasizes the need for increased utilization of more nuanced cognitive and mood outcome measures.

Association between red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and the prognosis in patients with autoimmune encephalitis: a retrospective cohort study

Aim

Red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) is a combined new indicator reflecting immunology and has been reported to predict the prognosis of inflammation-related diseases and brain diseases. However, the association and predictive value of RAR in the prognosis of patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) has not been reported.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study, and data were collected from the Henan Provincial People's Hospital. RAR was categorized according to quartile. The prognosis was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and an mRS score of ≥3 was defined as a poor prognosis. The logistical regression model was used to explore the association between RAR and the prognosis, with results reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The predictive value of RAR was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiving operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results

A total of 175 eligible patients were included for analysis, and 51 patients were identified as having poor prognosis. After adjusting age, cancer, other diseases, histological subtype, antiepileptic therapy, anti-tumor treatment, ICU treatment, and length of stay, RAR in the highest quartile (Q4) was found to be significantly associated with the high odds of poor prognosis (OR = 5.63, 95%CI: 1.98-16.02) compared to RAR in the lowest quartile (Q1). In addition, RAR was identified as a predictor for the prognosis of AE patients (AUC = 0.660, 95%CI: 0.574-0.746).

Conclusion

This study found the close association and predictive value of RAR for the prognosis of AE patients, indicating that RAR might help clinicians identify high-risk populations.

Cerebrospinal fluid indices as predictors of treatment response in autoimmune encephalitis

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indices reflecting intrathecal antibody production and blood-brain barrier impairment are not routinely assessed in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE). We aimed to study CSF indices and their association with the prognosis of AE.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study conducted at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), Kochi, India, included 60 patients aged more than 18 years with definite/probable/possible AE admitted to the Department of Neurology from August 2016 to November 2021. We introduced a classification of treatment response based on modified Rankin Scale change over time and treatment modalities.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 60 patients (six [10%] seropositive cases), a good rapid treatment response was associated with CSF white blood cell count of more than 4 cells/mm3 (OR, 4.57; 95% CI 1.31-15.96; P = .02) and positive immunoglobulin G (IgG) Local Synthesis (OR, 7.27; 95% CI 1.56-33.86; P = .01). Albumin Index had association with a poor Glasgow Coma Scale score at the nadir of the disease (OR, 1.17; 95% CI 1.01-1.34; P = .04). Similar results were yielded in the seronegative cohort. IgG Local Synthesis appeared to be a strong predictor for good rapid treatment response in both univariate and multivariate (adjusted OR, 28.71; 95% CI 2.12-389.22; P= .01) analysis. Time to immunotherapy was reversely correlated with good response overall (in the cohort with outliers removed [N = 49]: unadjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99; P= .01; adjusted OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.95-0.99; P= .008).

CONCLUSION

CSF indices reflecting intrathecal antibody production and blood-brain barrier impairment appear to be promising predictors of disease severity and therapeutic response in patients with autoimmune encephalitis.

Impact of blood-brain barrier disruption on clinical features and treatment response in patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune encephalitis

AIMS

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown is an essential mechanism in inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system. However, the association between BBB integrity and autoimmune encephalitis (AE) has not been investigated. Our study aimed to analyze this relationship in patients with AE between BBB integrity with clinical manifestations and therapeutic responses.

METHODS

Our study enrolled 147 patients with AE who were newly diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between August 2015 and December 2021. Patients were classified into normal or damaged BBB groups based on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) albumin/serum albumin (QAlb). To evaluate the severity of the illness, we used the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE).

RESULTS

We found a higher proportion of males, higher CSF protein, immunoglobulin IgG, and 24-h intrathecal IgG synthesis rate in the damaged BBB group. The improvement rate was lower in the damaged BBB group, but we found that double- or triple-combination immunotherapy had better clinical outcomes than single immunotherapy. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the CASE score and mRS score, and a positive correlation between the CASE score or mRS score and QAlb on admission.

CONCLUSIONS

BBB integrity is closely related to the clinical features and treatment responses of newly diagnosed AE. Patients with AE and a damaged BBB may benefit from combination immunotherapy.

Clinical scales in autoimmune encephalitis-A retrospective monocentric cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Assessing severity of antibody-mediated encephalitis (AE) or paraneoplastic encephalitis (PE) requires valid and reliable scores to guide treatment decisions and predict outcome both in clinical routine and studies. We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) and the anti-NMDAR-encephalitis one-year functional status (NEOS) score in patients suffering from AE and PE in a large monocentric cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively applied the CASE and NEOS score to patients with definite AE and PE treated at a tertiary hospital. Correlations were established between the CASE and NEOS score and the modified Rankin scale (mRs). Multivariable analyses were calculated to identify predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (27 AE, 7 PE) were included. Correlations between mRS and CASE score were strongest in patients with AE compared to PE at all intervals, but in the subgroups (LGI1, NMDAR, GAD, miscellaneous surface antibodies, PE) the correlation was strongest in the interval after baseline. Patients with AE seemed to display better outcomes compared to PE, which was underlined by multivariable analysis. Improvement was mostly observed within 6-12 months after disease onset, after which little or no further improvement was noted with some exception for two patients with anti-NMDARE who recovered substantially even after 12 months of treatment. The NEOS score significantly predicted the outcome at last follow-up in patients with AE with a sensitivity of 79% at a cut-off value of 2 points (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-0.99, p = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

The CASE and NEOS score are suitable supplementary tools in addition to the mRS for capturing diverse symptoms, for grading and monitoring symptom severity.

Cerebrospinal fluid YKL-40 level evolution is associated with autoimmune encephalitis remission

Objective

Because of its heterogeneity in clinical presentation and course, predicting autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) evolution remains challenging. Hence, our aim was to explore the correlation of several biomarkers with the clinical course of disease.

Methods

Thirty-seven cases of AIE were selected retrospectively and divided into active (N = 9), improved (N = 12) and remission (N = 16) AIE according to their disease evolution. Nine proteins were tested in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at diagnosis (T0) and during the follow-up (T1), in particular activated MMP-9 (MMP-9A) and YKL-40 (or chitinase 3-like 1).

Results

From diagnosis to revaluation, AIE remission was associated with decreased YKL-40 and MMP-9A levels in the CSF, and with decreased NfL and NfH levels in the serum. The changes in YKL-40 concentrations in the CSF were associated with (1) still active AIE when increasing >10% (P-value = 0.0093); (2) partial improvement or remission when the changes were between +9% and -20% (P-value = 0.0173); and remission with a reduction > -20% (P-value = 0.0072; overall difference between the three groups: P-value = 0.0088). At T1, the CSF YKL-40 levels were significantly decreased between active and improved as well as improved and remission AIE groups but with no calculable threshold because of patient heterogeneity.

Conclusion

The concentration of YKL-40, a cytokine-like proinflammatory protein produced by glial cells, is correlated in the CSF with the clinical course of AIE. Its introduction as a biomarker may assist in following disease activity and in evaluating therapeutic response.

Early-Stage Contactin-Associated Protein-like 2 Limbic Encephalitis: Clues for Diagnosis

Background and Objectives

Previous studies suggested that autoimmune limbic encephalitis with antibodies against contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2-encephalitis) is clinically heterogeneous and progresses slowly, preventing its early recognition. We aimed to describe the onset and progression of CASPR2-encephalitis and to assess long-term outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients whose CSF tested positive for anti-CASPR2 antibodies in our center between 2006 and 2020. Standardized telephone interviews of all available patients and relatives were conducted, assessing long-term functional independence using the Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ) and quality of life using the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF36).

Results

Forty-eight patients were included (98% males; median age 64 years), and 35 participated in telephone interviews (73%). At onset, 81% had at least 1 neurologic symptom among the following: limbic (54%), peripheral nerve hyperexcitability (PNH; 21%), and/or cerebellar symptoms (17%). Most of the patients (75%) had initially symptoms of only one of these categories. Limbic symptoms at onset included mostly seizures (33%), while memory disturbances were less frequent (10%). PNH signs were mostly neuropathic pain (9/10 patients). Other symptoms seen at onset included asthenia (33%), mood disorders (25%), and insomnia (21%); 19% of patients did not show any limbic, peripheral, or cerebellar symptom at onset but only asthenia (15%), mood disorders (6%), weight loss (8%), dysautonomia (4%), and/or insomnia (2%). The peak of the disease was attained in median 16.7 months after onset. Over the study period (median follow-up, 58.8 months, range 10.6–189.1), 77% of patients developed ≥3 core CASPR2 symptoms and 42% fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune limbic encephalitis, although all patients ultimately developed limbic symptoms. At the last visit, most interviewed patients (28/35 patients, 80%; median, 5 years after onset) had recovered functional independence (FAQ <9) while only the vitality subscore of the SF36 was lower than normative data (mean 49.9 vs 58.0, p = 0.0369).

Discussion

CASPR2-encephalitis has a progressive course and is highly heterogeneous at the early stage. In men older than 50 years, otherwise unexplained seizures, cerebellar ataxia, and/or neuropathic pain are suggestive of early-stage CASPR2-encephalitis, especially if they coincide with recent asthenia, mood disorders, or insomnia.

Simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab for autoimmune encephalitis with neuronal surface antibodies

Background

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) with neuronal surface antibodies (NSAbs) presents pathogenesis mediated by B cell-secreting antibodies. Rituximab is a second-line choice for the treatment for AE with NSAbs, which can cause B cell depletion via targeting CD20. However, the optimal protocol and dosage of rituximab combined with first-line therapy for NSAbs-associated AE remains unclear so far. In this study, we explored the efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab combined with first-line treatment for NSAbs-associated AE.

Methods

Fifty-nine AE patients with NSAbs were enrolled, and retrospectively divided into common first-line therapy (41 patients) and combined low-dose rituximab (100 mg induction weekly with 3 circles, followed by 100 mg reinfusion every 6 months) with first-line therapy (18 patients). Outcome measures included changes in the Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) score (primary endpoint), changes in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), the patient and caregiver Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) score at each visit (baseline, discharge, 6 months, 12 months and last follow-up) between two groups (secondary endpoint), as well as oral prednisone dosage, relapse and adverse effects during follow-up.

Results

Compared with traditional first-line therapy group, for primary outcome, CASE scores at last follow-up were significantly improved in combined rituximab group, as well as markedly improving changes of CASE scores between baseline and each visit. While changes of mRS, MMSE and NPI scores, as secondary endpoint, were all markedly accelerating improvement between baseline and each visit, as well as both oral prednisone dosage and relapse were also greatly reduced during follow-up. Meanwhile, longitudinal analysis in combination of rituximab cohort also revealed persistently marked amelioration in a series of scales from baseline even more than 1 year. Moreover, analysis in rituximab subgroup showed no difference in any clinical outcomes between combination with single first-line and with repeated first-line treatment (≥ 2 times), while compared to delayed combination with rituximab (> 3 months), early initiation of combination (≤ 3 months) might achieve better improvements in CASE and MMSE assessment even 1 year later. No rituximab-correlated serious adverse events have been reported in our patients.

Conclusions

Our simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab firstly showed significantly accelerating short-term recovery and long-term improvement for AE with NSAbs, in parallel with markedly reduced prednisone dosage and clinical relapses. Moreover, opportunity of protocol showed earlier initiation (≤ 3 months) with better long-term improvement.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-022-02622-8.

Performance of the clinical assessment scale for autoimmune encephalitis in a pediatric autoimmune encephalitis cohort

Background

The Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE), a new scale used for rating the severity of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), has demonstrated good validity and reliability in adults with AE, but there is a shortage of data on its performance in children with AE. This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the CASE in a cohort of children with AE.

Methods

Forty-seven pediatric inpatients with AE who visited Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital between January 1, 2017, and October 31, 2021, were enrolled in the study. The CASE and mRS scores were obtained through a review of detailed medical records from the Health Information System by two pediatric neurologists. Finally, the performance of the CASE in this pediatric AE cohort was analyzed.

Results

The results showed that anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis was the most common (61.70%) type of AE in children. The most common clinical manifestations were language problems (85.1%), psychiatric symptoms (80.9%), and dyskinesia/dystonia (78.7%). The CASE had good item reliability and interevaluator reliability; the Cronbach’s alpha value of the total score was 0.825, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) was 0.980. The Cronbach’s alpha value by item ranged from 0.16 to 0.406; items 1 and 9 had the lowest and highest Cronbach’s alpha values, respectively. The criterion validity between CASE and mRS total scores, as quantified by Pearson correlation, was 0.459, indicating slight to good criterion validity. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.992 (95% confidence interval: 0.974-1.00). A cutoff value of 14 was selected to determine whether a patient needed admission to the ICU; this cutoff had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92%. The changes in EEG, MRI, and antibody titers were not related to the severity of AE. A CASE score cutoff of 9 was selected to indicate whether second-line treatment would be needed.

Conclusion

The CASE has good reliability and validity in children with AE; however, some items of the CASE may not apply to this population. Thus, an in-depth study of the CASE is needed in children with AE.

The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratios Are Independently Associated With the Severity of Autoimmune Encephalitis

Background

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are biomarkers that may reflect inflammatory status in some immune-related diseases. This study aims to investigate the association of NLR and MLR with the severity and prognosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE).

Methods

A total of 199 patients diagnosed with AE in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were used to evaluate the severity of the patients at admission, and the patients were divided into mild group (CASE ≤ 4) and severe group (CASE ≥ 5) according to the CASE score. Poor prognosis was described as an mRS of 3 or more at 12 months. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for the severity and prognosis of AE.

Results

NLR and MLR of severe group were significantly higher than that of mild group. NLR and MLR were positively correlated with the CASE score (r = 0.659, P < 0.001; r = 0.533, P < 0.001) and the mRS score (r = 0.609, P < 0.001;r = 0.478, P < 0.001) in AE patients. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that NLR (OR = 1.475, 95%CI: 1.211-1.796, P < 0.001) and MLR (OR = 15.228, 95%CI: 1.654-140.232, P = 0.016) were independent risk factors for the severity of AE. In addition, the CASE score and the mRS score were positively correlated (r = 0.849, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the CASE at admission (OR = 1.133, 95%CI: 1.043-1.229, P = 0.003) and age (OR = 1.105, 95%CI: 1.062-1.150, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the poor prognosis of AE patients. The NLR and MLR at admission and whether they decreased after immunotherapy were not associated with the prognosis of AE patients (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

NLR and MLR, readily available and widespread inflammatory markers, were helpful for clinicians to monitor disease progression and identify potentially severe patients of AE early to optimize clinical treatment decisions.

Risk Prediction Models for Early ICU Admission in Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis: Integrating Scale-Based Assessments of the Disease Severity

Background

In patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE), the prediction of progression to a critically ill status is challenging but essential. However, there is currently no standard prediction model that comprehensively integrates the disease severity and other clinical features. The clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis (CASE) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) have both been applied for evaluating the severity of AE. Here, by combining the two scales and other clinical characteristics, we aimed to investigate risk factors and construct prediction models for early critical care needs of AE patients.

Methods

Definite and probable AE patients who were admitted to the neurology department of Tongji Hospital between 2013 and 2021 were consecutively enrolled. The CASE and mRS scores were used to evaluate the overall symptom severity at the time of hospital admission. Using logistic regression analysis, we analyzed the association between the total scores of the two scales and critical illness individually and then we evaluated this association in combination with other clinical features to predict early intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Finally, we constructed four prediction models and compared their performances.

Results

Of 234 patients enrolled, forty developed critical illness and were early admitted to the ICU (within 14 days of hospitalization). Four prediction models were generated; the models were named CASE, CASE-plus (CASE + prodromal symptoms + elevated fasting blood glucose + elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) count), mRS and mRS-plus (mRS + prodromal symptoms + abnormal EEG results + elevated fasting blood glucose + elevated CSF WBC count) and had areas under the ROC curve of 0.850, 0.897, 0.695 and 0.833, respectively. All four models had good calibrations. In general, the models containing “CASE” performed better than those including “mRS”, and the CASE-plus model demonstrated the best performance.

Conclusion

Overall, the symptom severity at hospital admission, as defined by CASE or mRS, could predict early ICU admission, especially when assessed by CASE. Adding other clinical findings, such as prodromal symptoms, an increased fasting blood glucose level and an increased CSF WBC count, could improve the predictive efficacy.