Visual Input Is the Main Trigger and Parametric Determinant for Catch-Up Saccades During Video Head Impulse Test in Bilateral Vestibular Loss

Catch-Up Saccades in Vestibular Hypofunction: A Contribution of the Cerebellum?

Long-term deficits of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) elicited by head rotation can be partially compensated by catch-up saccades (CuS). These saccades are initially visually guided, but their latency can greatly decrease resulting in short latency CuS (SL-CuS). It is still unclear what triggers these CuS and what are the underlying neural circuits. In this study, we aimed at evaluating the impact of cerebellar pathology on CuS by comparing their characteristics between two groups of patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction, with or without additional cerebellar dysfunction. We recruited 12 patients with both bilateral vestibular hypofunction and cerebellar dysfunction (BVH-CD group) and 12 patients with isolated bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH group). Both groups were matched for age and residual VOR gain. Subjects underwent video head impulse test recording of the horizontal semicircular canals responses as well as recording of visually guided saccades in the step, gap, and overlap paradigms. Latency and gain of the different saccades were calculated. The mean age for BVH-CD and BVH was, respectively, 67.8 and 67.2 years, and the mean residual VOR gain was, respectively, 0.24 and 0.26. The mean latency of the first catch-up saccade was significantly longer for the BVH-CD group than that for the BVH group (204 ms vs 145 ms, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the latency of visually guided saccades between the two groups, for none of the three paradigms. The gain of covert saccades tended to be lower in the BVH-CD group than in BVH group (t test; p = 0.06). The mean gain of the 12° or 20° visually guided saccades were not different in both groups. Our results suggest that the cerebellum plays a role in the generation of compensatory SL-CuS observed in BVH patients.

Effects of pupil size in video head-impulse tests

The results of video head impulse tests (video-HITs) may be confounded by data artifacts of various origins, including pupil size and eyelid obstruction of the pupil. This study aimed to determine the effect of these factors on the results of video-HITs. We simulated ptosis by adopting pharmacological dilatation of the pupil in 21 healthy participants (11 women; age 24-58 years). Each participant underwent video-HITs before and after pupillary dilatation using 0.5% tropicamide. We assessed the changes in the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, corrective saccade amplitude, and frequency of eyelid flicks. After pupillary dilatation, the VOR gain decreased for both right (RAC; 1.12 [Formula: see text] 0.12 vs. 1.01 [Formula: see text] 0.16, p = 0.011) and left anterior canals (LACs; 1.15 [Formula: see text] 0.13 vs. 0.96 [Formula: see text] 0.14, p < 0.001), and right posterior canal (RPC, 1.10 [Formula: see text] 0.13 vs. 0.98 [Formula: see text] 0.09, p = 0.001). The corrective saccade amplitudes also decreased significantly for all four vertical canals. The frequency of eyelid flicks, however, did not change. The changes of VOR gain were positively correlated with the lid excursion in RPC (r = 0.629, p = 0.002) and LPC (r = 0.549, p = 0.010). Our study indicates that eyelid position and pupil size should be considered when interpreting the results of video-HITs, especially for the vertical canals. Pupils should be shrunk in a very well-lit room, and artifacts should be prevented by taping or lifting the eyelids as required during video-HITs.

Compensatory saccade in the vestibular impaired monkey

Introduction

Loss of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) affects visual acuity during head movements. Patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular deficits often use saccadic eye movements to compensate for an inadequate VOR. Two types of compensatory saccades have been distinguished, covert saccades and overt saccades. Covert saccades occur during head rotation, whereas overt saccades occur after the head has stopped moving. The generation of covert saccades is part of a central vestibular compensation process that improves visual acuity and suppresses oscillopsia. Understanding the covert saccade mechanism may facilitate vestibular rehabilitation strategies that can improve the patient's quality of life. To understand the brain mechanisms underlying covert saccades at the neural level, studies in an animal model are necessary. In this study, we employed non-human primates whose vestibular end organs are injured.

Methods

We examined eye movement during the head-impulse test, which is a clinical test to evaluate the vestibulo-ocular reflex. During this test, the monkeys are required to fixate on a target and the head is rapidly and unexpectedly rotated to stimulate the horizontal semi-circular canals.

Results

Similar to human subjects, monkeys made compensatory saccades. We compared these saccades with catch-up saccades following a moving target that simulates the visual conditions during the head impulse test. The shortest latency of the catch-up saccades was 250 ms, which indicates that it requires at least 250 ms to induce saccades by a visual signal. The latency of some compensatory saccades is shorter than 250 ms during the head impulse test, suggesting that such short latency compensatory saccades were not induced visually. The peak velocity of the short latency saccades was significantly lower than that of longer latency saccades. The peak velocity of these longer latency saccades was closer to that of visually guided saccades induced by a stepping target.

Conclusion

These results are consistent with studies in human patients. Thus, this study demonstrates, for the first time, compensatory covert saccades in vestibular impaired monkeys.

Reduced Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex During Fast Head Rotation in Complete Darkness

The human vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) leads to maintenance of the acuity of an image on the retina and contributes to the perception of orientation during high acceleration head movements. Our objective was to determine whether vision affects the horizontal VOR by assessing and comparing the performance at the boundaries of contribution of: (a) unrestricted visual information and (b) no visual information. Understanding how the VOR performs under both lighted and unlighted conditions is of paramount importance to avoiding falls, perhaps particularly among the elderly. We tested 23 participants (M age = 35.3 years, standard error of mean (SEM) = 2.0 years). The participants were tested with the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), EyeSeeCam from Interacoustics™, which assesses whether VOR is of the expected angular velocity compared to head movement angular velocity. The vHIT tests were performed under two conditions: (a) in a well-lit room and (b) in complete darkness. The VOR was analyzed by evaluating the gain (quotient between eye and head angular velocity) at 40, 60 and 80 ms time stamps after the start of head movement. Additionally, we calculated the approximate linear gain between 0-100 ms through regression. The gain decreased significantly faster across time stamps in complete darkness (p < .001), by 10% in darkness compared with a 2% decrease in light. In complete darkness, the VOR gain gradually declined, reaching a marked reduction at 80 ms by 10% (p < .001), at which the head velocities were 150°/second or faster. The approximate linear gain value was not significantly different in complete darkness and in light. These findings suggest that information from the visual system can modulate the high velocity VOR. Subsequently, fast head turns might cause postural imbalance and momentary disorientation in poor light in people with reduced sensory discrimination or motor control, like the elderly.

Virtual reality set-up for studying vestibular function during head impulse test

Objectives

Virtual reality (VR) offers an ecological setting and the possibility of altered visual feedback during head movements useful for vestibular research and treatment of vestibular disorders. There is however no data quantifying vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during head impulse test (HIT) in VR. The main objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and performance of eye and head movement measurements of healthy subjects in a VR environment during high velocity horizontal head rotation (VR-HIT) under a normal visual feedback condition. The secondary objective is to establish the feasibility of VR-HIT recordings in the same group of normal subjects but under altered visual feedback conditions.

Design

Twelve healthy subjects underwent video HIT using both a standard setup (vHIT) and VR-HIT. In VR, eye and head positions were recorded by using, respectively, an imbedded eye tracker and an infrared motion tracker. Subjects were tested under four conditions, one reproducing normal visual feedback and three simulating an altered gain or direction of visual feedback. During these three altered conditions the movement of the visual scene relative to the head movement was decreased in amplitude by 50% (half), was nullified (freeze) or was inverted in direction (inverse).

Results

Eye and head motion recording during normal visual feedback as well as during all 3 altered conditions was successful. There was no significant difference in VOR gain in VR-HIT between normal, half, freeze and inverse conditions. In the normal condition, VOR gain was significantly but slightly (by 3%) different for VR-HIT and vHIT. Duration and amplitude of head impulses were significantly greater in VR-HIT than in vHIT. In all three altered VR-HIT conditions, covert saccades were present in approximatively one out of four trials.

Conclusion

Our VR setup allowed high quality recording of eye and head data during head impulse test under normal and altered visual feedback conditions. This setup could be used to investigate compensation mechanisms in vestibular hypofunction, to elicit adaptation of VOR in ecological settings or to allow objective evaluation of VR-based vestibular rehabilitation.

Effects of saccade delay, side of deficit, and training on detection of catch-up saccades during head-impulse test in virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin

In this study, a training simulator for the examination of dizzy patients based on a virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin (VREM) was developed to evaluate the detection of catch-up saccades during head impulse test (HIT) and the effect of training in VREM. For novices (n = 35), 2 trials were conducted before and after a training session. Experts (n = 7) were submitted to an evaluation session. In each trial, a left or a right horizontal canal deficit with an overt catch-up saccade (delay between 110 and 320 ms) was randomly presented. Participants scored the difficulty in performing the maneuver, in recognizing the saccades, and the self-confidence in the diagnosis using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Saccade delay significantly influenced the performance. Training significantly improved the sensitivity in the residents (69.1% before to 97.9% after the training, p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test, n = 560 tests), surpassing experts' performances (p < 0.001, versus 87% in experts, Fisher's exact test). The specificity also increased to the expert level (78% before to 95% after the training, and 95% in experts, p < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). The VAS showed a decrease difficulty to execute the HIT, with an increase in the confidence after training. VREM improved the HIT execution performance and the confidence in novice practitioners.

Presence of corrective saccades in patients with normal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in video head impulse test

Background

The video head impulse test (vHIT) is a valuable clinical tool that can help identify dysfunction of the semicircular canals. While in cases with semicircular canal dysfunction, both decreased vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and corrective saccades (CS) are usually observed, there are cases which show CS despite normal VOR gain in vHIT.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients who showed CS with normal VOR gain in vHIT.

Materials and methods

Among 390 patients who underwent vHIT, 51 patients (20 males and 31 females, age 31-87 years, average 61.3 years old) who showed CS with normal VOR gain unilaterally during horizontal vHIT were included. All patients had normal vHIT (normal VOR gain and absent CS) on the contralateral side.The VOR gain of vHIT, the maximum slow phase velocity in the caloric test, and the amplitude of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs) were analyzed.

Results

The VOR gain on the affected side (0.95 ± 0.08) was significantly smaller than that on the contralateral side (1.03 ± 0.13) in horizontal vHIT (p < 0.001). The maximum slow phase velocity in the caloric test on the affected side (17.9 ± 17.8 degrees/s) was significantly smaller than that on the contralateral side (21.3 ± 16.6 degrees/s, p = 0.020). There were no significant differences in the amplitude of cVEMPs or oVEMPs between the affected side and the contralateral side (p = 0.096 for cVEMP; p = 0.770 for oVEMP).

Conclusion

The side that showed CS with normal VOR gain in horizontal vHIT showed significantly smaller VOR gain as well as smaller caloric responses compared to the contralateral side. Having CS with normal VOR gain could be a sensitive indicator of mild dysfunction of the semicircular canals.

Saccades of video head impulse test in Meniere's disease and Vestibular Migraine: What can we learn from?

Background

Saccades are often observed on video head impulse tests (vHIT) in patients with Meniere's Disease (MD) and Vestibular Migraine (VM). However, their saccadic features are not fully described.

Objective

This study aims to identify the saccades characteristics of MD and VM.

Methods

75 VM patients and 103 definite unilateral MD patients were enrolled in this study. First raw saccades were exported and analyzed. The VM patients were divided into left and right based on their ears, while the MD patients were separated into affected and unaffected subgroups based on their audiograms and symptoms.

Results

The MD patients have more saccades on the affected side (85% vs. 69%), and saccade velocity is more consistent than the contralateral side (shown by the coefficient of variation). The saccades occurrence rates on both sides are similar in VM (77% vs. 76%), as are other saccadic parameters. The MD patients have more significant inter-aural differences than the VM patients, manifested in higher velocity (p-value 0.000), earlier arriving (p-value 0.010), and more time-domain gathered (p-value 0.003) on the affected side.

Conclusions

Bilateral saccades are commonly observed in MD and VM. In contrast to MD, saccades on VM are subtle, scattered, and late-arrived. Furthermore, the MD patients showed inconsistent saccadic distribution with more velocity-uniform saccades on the affected side.

[Analysis of the efficacy of different timing of vestibular rehabilitation interventions in the acute phase of vestibular neuritis]

Objective:To investigate the impact of time interval from symptoms onset to vestibular rehabilitation on the recovery of patients in the acute phase of vestibular neuritis. Methods:Thirty-one patients with vestibular neuritis treated in outpatient and inpatient settings from December 2019 to July 2021 were selected and randomly divided into vestibular rehabilitation group and general treatment group. The vestibular rehabilitation group was subdivided into early-intervention group （1-week after symptom onset） and late-intervention group （2-week after symptom onset） according to the interval from the onset to vestibular rehabilitation. The differences in DP, UW, VOR, DHI, BBS and SAS values at 1 month and 3 months after treatment were compared among early-intervention group（11 cases）, late-intervention group （10 cases） and general treatment group（10 cases）. Results:For patients in the vestibular rehabilitation group and the general treatment group, DP, UW, VOR gain, DHI score and SAS score were significantly different after treatment （ P<0.05） and no significant difference was found in BBS score （P>0.05 ）. Pairwise comparisons between early-intervention and late-intervention group showed that the DP, UW and VOR gain were significantly different （P<0.05）, while the score of DHI and SAS were not significantly different （P>0.05）. Conclusion:Vestibular rehabilitation therapy can accelerate vestibular compensation, relieve vertigo symptoms and anxiety symptoms in patients with vestibular neuritis. It is better to be carried out within 1 week after symptom onset.

The Role of Neck Input in Producing Corrective Saccades in the Head Impulse Test

Background

The head impulse test is a valuable clinical test that can help identify peripheral vestibular dysfunction by observing corrective saccades that return the eyes to the target of interest. Corrective saccades have been classified as covert if the onset occurs before the end of the head impulse and as overt if they occur afterwards. However, the mechanism that trigger these saccades remain unclear.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine the role of neck input in generating overt as well as covert saccades.

Methods

Sixteen patients (9 males and 7 females: age 35-80 years, average 62.7 years old) who showed corrective saccades during the head impulse test were included. Twelve patients had unilateral vestibular dysfunction, and 4 patients had bilateral vestibular dysfunction. Patients underwent both the head impulse test (HIT) and the body impulse test (BIT) in a randomized order. While the head is rotated horizontally in HIT, the body is rotated horizontally in BIT. During BIT, the neck is fixed by a cervical collar (neck lock extrication collar) to reduce somatosensory input from the neck. The head movements and eye movements were recorded and analyzed by the video HIT recording system.

Results

In all 16 patients, corrective saccades were observed in HIT as well as in BIT. While there were no significant differences in peak head velocities between HIT and BIT (p = 0.33, paired t-test), the VOR gain in BIT was significantly smaller than that in HIT (p = 0.011, paired t-test). The number of overt saccades per trial in BIT was significantly decreased compared to that in HIT (p < 0.001, paired t-test) whereas there were no significant differences in the number of covert saccades between the two tests. The proportion of overt saccades among all corrective saccades in BIT was significantly lower than the proportion in HIT (p < 0.001, paired t-test).

Conclusions

Somatosensory input from the neck contributes to the generation of overt saccades and reinforces the vestibulo-ocular reflex complementing the retinal slip during high frequency head movements.

Short-Latency Covert Saccades - The Explanation for Good Dynamic Visual Performance After Unilateral Vestibular Loss?

Background: Functional head impulse test (fHIT) tests the ability of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to allow visual perception during head movements. Our previous study showed that active head movements to the side with a vestibular lesion generated a dynamic visual performance that were as good as during movements to the intact side. Objective: To examine the differences in eye position during the head impulse test when performed with active and passive head movements, in order to better understand the role of the different saccade properties in improving visual performance. Method: We recruited 8 subjects with complete unilateral vestibular loss (4 men and 4 women, mean age 47 years) and tested them with video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) and Functional Head Impulse Test (fHIT) during passive and active movements while looking at a target. We assessed the mean absolute position error of the eye during different time frames of the head movement, the peak latency and the peak velocity of the first saccade, as well as the visual performance during the head movement. Results: Active head impulses to the lesioned side generated dynamic visual performances that were as good as when testing the intact side. Active head impulses resulted in smaller position errors during the visual perception task (p = 0.006) compared to passive head-impulses and the position error during the visual perception time frame correlated with shorter latencies of the first saccade (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Actively generated head impulses toward the side with a complete vestibular loss resulted in a position error within or close to the margin necessary to obtain visual perception for a brief period of time in patients with chronic unilateral vestibular loss. This seems to be attributed to the appearance of short-latency covert saccades, which position the eyes in a more favorable position during head movements.

Two conditions to fully recover dynamic canal function in unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction patients

BACKGROUND

The crucial role of early vestibular rehabilitation (VR) to recover a dynamic semicircular canal function was recently highlighted in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction (UVH). However, wide inter-individual differences were observed, suggesting that parameters other than early rehabilitation are involved.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine to what extent the degree of vestibular loss assessed by the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) gain could be an additional parameter interfering with rehabilitation in the recovery process. And to examine whether different VR protocols have the same effectiveness with regard to the aVOR recovery.

METHODS

The aVOR gain and the percentage of compensatory saccades were recorded in 81 UVH patients with the passive head impulse test before and after early VR (first two weeks after vertigo onset: N = 43) or late VR (third to sixth week after onset: N = 38) performed twice a week for four weeks. VR was performed either with the unidirectional rotation paradigm or gaze stability exercises. Supplementary outcomes were the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) score, and the static and dynamic subjective visual vertical.

RESULTS

The cluster analysis differentiated two distinct populations of UVH patients with pre-rehab aVOR gain values on the hypofunction side below 0.20 (N = 42) or above 0.20 (N = 39). The mean gain values were respectively 0.07±0.05 and 0.34±0.12 for the lateral canal (p < 0.0001), 0.09±0.06 and 0.44±0.19 for the anterior canal (p < 0.0001). Patients with aVOR gains above 0.20 and early rehab fully recovered dynamic horizontal canal function (0.84±0.14) and showed very few compensatory saccades (18.7% ±20.1%) while those with gains below 0.20 and late rehab did not improve their aVOR gain value (0.16±0.09) and showed compensatory saccades only (82.9% ±23.7%). Similar results were found for the anterior canal function. Recovery of the dynamic function of the lateral canal was found with both VR protocols while it was observed with the gaze stability exercises only for the anterior canal. All the patients reduced their DHI score, normalized their static SVV, and exhibited uncompensated dynamic SVV.

CONCLUSIONS

Early rehab is a necessary but not sufficient condition to fully recover dynamic canal function. The degree of vestibular loss plays a crucial role too, and to be effective rehabilitation protocols must be carried out in the plane of the semicircular canals.

Diagnosing vestibular hypofunction: an update

Unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction presents most commonly with symptoms of dizziness or postural imbalance and affects a large population. However, it is often missed because no quantitative testing of vestibular function is performed, or misdiagnosed due to a lack of standardization of vestibular testing. Therefore, this article reviews the current status of the most frequently used vestibular tests for canal and otolith function. This information can also be used to reach a consensus about the systematic diagnosis of vestibular hypofunction.

The characteristics of vHIT gain and PR score in peripheral vestibular disorders

BACKGROUND

Clinical application of vHIT is limited due to a lack of interpretation of vHIT gain and saccades.

OBJECTIVES

This research focuses on comparing common vertigo diseases on vHIT gain and saccade divergence(PR score).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 165 patients who have one definite diagnosis, good data quality, and can be read by MATLAB software. All patients were grouped into unilateral vestibular dysfunction (UVD), Meniere's disease (MD), vestibular migraine (VM), Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS), bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH), benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), and acoustic neuroma (AN). PR score was calculated by an open-source software HitCal.

RESULTS

The saccade detection rate is higher than the abnormal vHIT gain on UVD, MD, VM, RHS, BVH and BPPV. PR score combined with vHIT gain could separate the affected side in UVD and RHS. In the MD group, both vHIT gain and PR score have inconspicuous performance. We also found that different compensation levels and hearing loss status affect results.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

vHIT gain combined with PR score enables a proper distinction among common vertigo diseases. PR score is more sensitive than the gain value on evaluating the physiological situation, vestibular compensation and disease progression.

Alcohol binge-drinking damage on the vestibulo-oculomotor reflex

PURPOSE

Binge drinking is associated with several adverse effects in multiple organs. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of a binge-like-drinking on the vestibulo-oculomotor reflex (VOR) using the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) and the functional Head Impulse Test (fHIT).

METHODS

Eleven healthy men (age range 32-35 years) with moderate drinking habits and no history of vestibular dysfunction were enrolled. A preliminary assessment of breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) to check for zero alcohol value and a pre-intake evaluation of VOR using the vHIT and the fHIT were carried on. Then, the subjects were asked to take drinks with different alcohol content (8-40% ethanol by volume) according to their choice, consuming at least 5 standard drinks. Volunteers stopped drinking after 3 h. After a further 30 min, post-intake BrAC measurements and VOR analysis were repeated.

RESULTS

After alcohol intake, vHIT recorded an overall significant reduction of VOR gain (0.82 ± 0.07 on both sides) although the outcomes were below the normal range only in the four subjects with the highest blood alcohol levels. The post-intake fHIT outcomes were substandard in 9 participants, with a significant deterioration in performance (% of exact answers = 84.54 ± 11.05% on the left, 83.18 ± 14.53 on the right).

CONCLUSIONS

Binge drinking severely affects VOR; fHIT seems more sensitive than vHIT in the assessment of VOR function for complex vestibular lesions, such as those determined by ethanol, suggesting that fHIT could support vHIT in vestibular dysfunction assessment.

Evidence a shared mechanism mediates ipsi- and contralesional compensatory saccades and gait after unilateral vestibular deafferentation

The study objective was to understand how the contralesional labyrinth contributes to gaze and gait stability after unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD). Head impulse testing (vHIT) was completed in 37 individuals [22 women (59%); age 52.13 ± 11.59 yr, mean ± SD] with UVD from vestibular schwannoma resection. Compensatory saccades (CS) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain were analyzed for both ipsilesional and contralesional impulses. Gait speed (10-m walk test) and endurance (2-min walk test) were collected for 35 individuals. CS were recruited during contralesional head rotation regardless of VOR gain on either the ipsilesional [ρ = 0.21 (−0.14, 0.57); Spearman rank (95% confidence interval)] or contralesional side [ρ = −0.04 (−0.42, 0.35)]. Additionally, the latency of these CS (151.19 ± 52.41 ms) was similar to that of CS generated during ipsilesional rotation (165.65 ± 21.62 ms; P = 0.159). CS recruited during ipsilesional vHIT were of a higher velocity ( P < 0.001) and greater frequency ( P < 0.001) compared with contralesional CS. VOR gain asymmetry was significantly correlated with gait speed [ρ = −0.37 (−0.73, −0.01)], yet individual VOR gain was not correlated [ipsilesional: ρ = 0.17 (−0.20, 0.55); contralesional: ρ = −0.18 (−0.52, 0.15)]. Our data reveal CS are recruited at similar latencies without correlation to VOR gain or direction of head rotation, and that the central integration of ipsilesional and contralesional vestibular afference correlates with gait. Together, our data suggest the brain considers vestibular afference from both sides when generating related behavioral output after UVD.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY After unilateral vestibular deafferentation, compensatory saccades (CS) have similar latencies regardless of the direction of head rotation, and those CS generated during contralesional head rotation are unrelated to extent of vestibular loss. Additionally, the extent of asymmetry in residual vestibular function, not the extent of vestibular loss, correlates with gait speed. Our data suggest a common mechanism is responsible for the generation of CS and restoration of gait speed in vestibular compensation.

Head impulse compensatory saccades: Visual dependence is most evident in bilateral vestibular loss

The normal vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) generates almost perfectly compensatory smooth eye movements during a 'head-impulse' rotation. An imperfect VOR gain provokes additional compensatory saccades to re-acquire an earth-fixed target. In the present study, we investigated vestibular and visual contributions on saccade production. Eye position and velocity during horizontal and vertical canal-plane head-impulses were recorded in the light and dark from 16 controls, 22 subjects after complete surgical unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD), eight subjects with idiopathic bilateral vestibular loss (BVL), and one subject after complete bilateral vestibular deafferentation (BVD). When impulses were delivered in the horizontal-canal plane, in complete darkness compared with light, first saccade frequency mean(SEM) reduced from 96.6(1.3)-62.3(8.9) % in BVL but only 98.3(0.6)-92.0(2.3) % in UVD; saccade amplitudes reduced from 7.0(0.5)-3.6(0.4) ° in BVL but were unchanged 6.2(0.3)-5.5(0.6) ° in UVD. In the dark, saccade latencies were prolonged in lesioned ears, from 168(8.4)-240(24.5) ms in BVL and 177(5.2)-196(5.7) ms in UVD; saccades became less clustered. In BVD, saccades were not completely abolished in the dark, but their amplitudes decreased from 7.3-3.0 ° and latencies became more variable. For unlesioned ears (controls and unlesioned ears of UVD), saccade frequency also reduced in the dark, but their small amplitudes slightly increased, while latency and clustering remained unchanged. First and second saccade frequencies were 75.3(4.5) % and 20.3(4.1) %; without visual fixation they dropped to 32.2(5.0) % and 3.8(1.2) %. The VOR gain was affected by vision only in unlesioned ears of UVD; gains for the horizontal-plane rose slightly, and the vertical-planes reduced slightly. All head-impulse compensatory saccades have a visual contribution, the magnitude of which depends on the symmetry of vestibular-function and saccade latency: BVL is more profoundly affected by vision than UVD, and second saccades more than first saccades. Saccades after UVD are probably triggered by contralateral vestibular function.