Infection in the Developing Brain: The Role of Unique Systemic Immune Vulnerabilities

Early life parechovirus infection neuropsychological outcomes at 8 years: a cohort study

Human parechovirus (HPeV) is a leading cause of Central Nervous System (CNS) infection in infancy. Despite this, little is known regarding the long-term neuropsychological impacts from HPeV infection. The aim of the present study was to explore the long-term neuropsychological impacts eight-year post-HPeV infection contracted during infancy. This study also aimed to investigate the differential impacts of HPeV itself compared to the effects of secondary meningitis (n = 23) or encephalitis (n = 3) associated with HPeV infection. Thirty-nine HPeV children participated in the study. Children completed performance-based measures of neuropsychological and language functioning (the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Fourth Edition, and the Test of Everyday Attention for Children). Parents completed questionnaire-based measures of emotional, behavioral, and pragmatic language functioning (the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning, the Child Behavior Checklist, and the Social Communication Questionnaire). Results revealed that, overall, children with HPeV were significantly more impaired on measures of selective, sustained, and divided attention compared to normative test populations. The current study incidentally found at least double the prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in the HPeV sample than what is typical in the normal population, suggesting that HPeV infection during infancy may be a risk factor for the later development of ADHD. Additionally, the presence of secondary meningitis or encephalitis did not relate to poorer neuropsychological outcomes in the current sample. The findings of this study have important implications regarding clinical management for children following HPeV infection in infancy.

The Tolerance Model of Non-Inflammatory Immune Competence in Acute Pediatric Malnutrition: Origins, Evidence, Test of Fitness and Growth Potential

The tolerance model rests on the thesis of a physiologically regulated, albeit unsustainable, systemic attempt to adapt to the catabolic challenge posed by acute prepubescent malnutrition even in its severe forms. The model centers on the immunological component of the attempt, positing reorientation toward a non-inflammatory form of competence in place of the classic paradigm of immunological attrition and exhaustion. The foundation of the model was laid in 1990, and sixteen years later it was articulated formally on the basis of a body of evidence centered on T cell cytokines and interventions with cytokine and hormonal mediators. The benefit originally suggested was a reduced risk of autoimmune pathologies consequent to the catabolic release of self-antigens, hence the designation highlighting immune tolerance. Herein, the emergence of the tolerance model is traced from its roots in the recognition that acute malnutrition elicits an endocrine-based systemic adaptive attempt. Thereafter, the growth of the evidence base supporting the model is outlined, and its potential to shed new light on existing information is tested by application to the findings of a published clinical study of acutely malnourished children. Finally, some knowledge gaps pertinent to the model are identified and its potential for growth consonant with evolving perceptions of immunobiology is illustrated.

Dilemmas and options for COVID-19 vaccination in children

Over 16 million children have been detected positive for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States since the outbreak of the pandemic. In general, children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 tend to have lighter symptoms than adults. However, in some cases, the infection can develop into severe forms, such as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Moreover, long-term public health preventive interventions have had some negative effects on the physical and mental health of children. Given the important role that vaccination plays in reducing severe illness and mortality, it is essential for the efficient implementation of vaccination in the pediatric population. Nevertheless, parental distrust of vaccination, especially with regard to its safety and efficacy, hinders this process. Herein, we comprehensively summarize the available data on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in children. The results show that the currently approved COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective for children. Although two doses of vaccine in children seem insufficient to prevent Omicron infection, the booster dose provides enhanced protection against infection and severe illness. Most importantly, the bivalent vaccine has been approved for use in the pediatric population to extend the immune response to currently circulating Omicron variant. And the immune protection afforded to newborns after maternal vaccination appears to last only 6 months. Therefore, in the current situation where the rate of virus mutation is accelerating and the COVID-19 pandemic is still severe, it is crucial to extend vaccine protection to children over 6 months of age to weave a tighter safety net.

Diagnosis of Neurological Infections in Pediatric Patients from Cell-Free DNA Specimens by Using Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

Central nervous system (CNS) infections can cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in children. Rapid and accurate pathogenic detection in suspected CNS infections is essential for disease control at the early stage of infection. To evaluate the performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in pediatric patients, we retrospectively analyzed the efficiency of cfDNA mNGS in children with CNS infections (n = 257) or noninfectious neurological disorders (n = 81). The CSF samples of 124 random subjects were used to evaluate the accuracy between mNGS of cfDNA and whole-cell DNA (wcDNA). In total, cfDNA mNGS detected a wide range of microbes with a detection rate of 71.0%, and the sensitivity and total coincidence rate with clinical diagnosis reached 68.9% and 67.5%, respectively. Compared with wcDNA mNGS, cfDNA mNGS had a higher efficacy in detecting viruses (66 versus 13) and Mycobacterium (7 versus 1), with significantly higher reads per million. The dominant causative pathogens were bacteria and viruses in CNS infections, but these presented with different pathogen spectra in different age categories. The best timing for the mNGS test ranged from 1 to 6 days after the start of anti-infection therapy, and the earlier mNGS started, the better was identification of bacterial CNS infections. This study emphasized that cfDNA mNGS had overall superiority to conventional methods on causative pathogen detection in pediatric CNS infections, and it was even better than wcDNA mNGS. Furthermore, research needs to be better validated in large-scale clinical trials to improve the clinical applications of cfDNA mNGS. IMPORTANCE Our study emphasized that cfDNA mNGS had overall superiority to conventional methods on causative pathogen detection in CNS-infected children, and it was even better than wcDNA mNGS. cfDNA mNGS detected a wide range of pathogens with a high total coincidence rate (67.5%) against clinical diagnosis. The best timing for cfDNA mNGS detection ranged from 1 to 6 days, rather than 0 days, after the start of empirical anti-infection therapy. The earlier mNGS started, the better the identifications of bacterial CNS infections. To the best of our knowledge, this research is the first report evaluating the clinical utility of mNGS with different methods (cfDNA versus wcDNA) of extracting DNA from CSF specimens in diagnosing pediatric CNS infections. Meanwhile, this is the largest cohort study that has evaluated the performance of mNGS using cfDNA from CSF specimens in pediatric patients with CNS infections.