1
|
Gillon CJ, Baker C, Ly R, Balzani E, Brunton BW, Schottdorf M, Ghosh S, Dehghani N. Open Data In Neurophysiology: Advancements, Solutions & Challenges. ARXIV 2024:arXiv:2407.00976v1. [PMID: 39010879 PMCID: PMC11247910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
Across the life sciences, an ongoing effort over the last 50 years has made data and methods more reproducible and transparent. This openness has led to transformative insights and vastly accelerated scientific progress1,2. For example, structural biology3 and genomics4,5 have undertaken systematic collection and publication of protein sequences and structures over the past half-century, and these data have led to scientific breakthroughs that were unthinkable when data collection first began (e.g.6). We believe that neuroscience is poised to follow the same path, and that principles of open data and open science will transform our understanding of the nervous system in ways that are impossible to predict at the moment. To this end, new social structures along with active and open scientific communities are essential7 to facilitate and expand the still limited adoption of open science practices in our field8. Unified by shared values of openness, we set out to organize a symposium for Open Data in Neuroscience (ODIN) to strengthen our community and facilitate transformative neuroscience research at large. In this report, we share what we learned during this first ODIN event. We also lay out plans for how to grow this movement, document emerging conversations, and propose a path toward a better and more transparent science of tomorrow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen J Gillon
- These authors contributed equally to this paper
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Cody Baker
- These authors contributed equally to this paper
- CatalystNeuro, Benicia, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Ly
- These authors contributed equally to this paper
- Scientific Data Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Edoardo Balzani
- Center for Computational Neuroscience, Flatiron Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bingni W Brunton
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Manuel Schottdorf
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Satrajit Ghosh
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Nima Dehghani
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- These authors contributed equally to this paper
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shi J, Gong X, Song Z, Xie W, Yang Y, Sun X, Wei P, Wang C, Zhao G. EPAT: a user-friendly MATLAB toolbox for EEG/ERP data processing and analysis. Front Neuroinform 2024; 18:1384250. [PMID: 38812743 PMCID: PMC11133744 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1384250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background At the intersection of neural monitoring and decoding, event-related potential (ERP) based on electroencephalography (EEG) has opened a window into intrinsic brain function. The stability of ERP makes it frequently employed in the field of neuroscience. However, project-specific custom code, tracking of user-defined parameters, and the large diversity of commercial tools have limited clinical application. Methods We introduce an open-source, user-friendly, and reproducible MATLAB toolbox named EPAT that includes a variety of algorithms for EEG data preprocessing. It provides EEGLAB-based template pipelines for advanced multi-processing of EEG, magnetoencephalography, and polysomnogram data. Participants evaluated EEGLAB and EPAT across 14 indicators, with satisfaction ratings analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t-test based on distribution normality. Results EPAT eases EEG signal browsing and preprocessing, EEG power spectrum analysis, independent component analysis, time-frequency analysis, ERP waveform drawing, and topological analysis of scalp voltage. A user-friendly graphical user interface allows clinicians and researchers with no programming background to use EPAT. Conclusion This article describes the architecture, functionalities, and workflow of the toolbox. The release of EPAT will help advance EEG methodology and its application to clinical translational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianwei Shi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xun Gong
- School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
| | - Ziang Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wenkai Xie
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yanfeng Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangjie Sun
- School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China
| | - Penghu Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Changming Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Guoguang Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- China International Neuroscience Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang HJ, Ferris DP. Non-invasive brain imaging to advance the understanding of human balance. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2023; 28:100505. [PMID: 38250696 PMCID: PMC10795750 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2023.100505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Helen J. Huang
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
- Disability, Aging, and Technology Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
- Biionix (Bionic Materials, Implants & Interfaces) Cluster, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Daniel P. Ferris
- J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reer A, Wiebe A, Wang X, Rieger JW. FAIR human neuroscientific data sharing to advance AI driven research and applications: Legal frameworks and missing metadata standards. Front Genet 2023; 14:1086802. [PMID: 37007976 PMCID: PMC10065194 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1086802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern AI supported research holds many promises for basic and applied science. However, the application of AI methods is often limited because most labs cannot, on their own, acquire large and diverse datasets, which are best for training these methods. Data sharing and open science initiatives promise some relief to the problem, but only if the data are provided in a usable way. The FAIR principles state very general requirements for useful data sharing: they should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. This article will focus on two challenges to implement the FAIR framework for human neuroscience data. On the one hand, human data can fall under special legal protection. The legal frameworks regulating how and what data can be openly shared differ greatly across countries which can complicate data sharing or even discourage researchers from doing so. Moreover, openly accessible data require standardization of data and metadata organization and annotation in order to become interpretable and useful. This article briefly introduces open neuroscience initiatives that support the implementation of the FAIR principles. It then reviews legal frameworks, their consequences for accessibility of human neuroscientific data and some ethical implications. We hope this comparison of legal jurisdictions helps to elucidate that some alleged obstacles for data sharing only require an adaptation of procedures but help to protect the privacy of our most generous donors to research … our study participants. Finally, it elaborates on the problem of missing standards for metadata annotation and introduces initiatives that aim at developing tools to make neuroscientific data acquisition and analysis pipelines FAIR by design. While the paper focuses on making human neuroscience data useful for data-intensive AI the general considerations hold for other fields where large amounts of openly available human data would be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Reer
- Applied Neurocognitive Psychology Lab, Institute for Medicine and Healthcare, Department of Psychology, Oldenburg University, Oldenburg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Aaron Reer,
| | - Andreas Wiebe
- Chair for Intellectual Property and Information Law, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Xu Wang
- Chair for Intellectual Property and Information Law, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jochem W. Rieger
- Applied Neurocognitive Psychology Lab, Institute for Medicine and Healthcare, Department of Psychology, Oldenburg University, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peterson SM, Rao RPN, Brunton BW. Learning neural decoders without labels using multiple data streams. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35905727 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac857c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent advances in neural decoding have accelerated the development of brain-computer interfaces aimed at assisting users with everyday tasks such as speaking, walking, and manipulating objects. However, current approaches for training neural decoders commonly require large quantities of labeled data, which can be laborious or infeasible to obtain in real-world settings. Alternatively, self-supervised models that share self-generated pseudo-labels between two data streams have shown exceptional performance on unlabeled audio and video data, but it remains unclear how well they extend to neural decoding. APPROACH We learn neural decoders without labels by leveraging multiple simultaneously recorded data streams, including neural, kinematic, and physiological signals. Specifically, we apply cross-modal, self-supervised deep clustering to train decoders that can classify movements from brain recordings. After training, we then isolate the decoders for each input data stream and compare the accuracy of decoders trained using cross-modal deep clustering against supervised and unimodal, self-supervised models. MAIN RESULTS We find that sharing pseudo-labels between two data streams during training substantially increases decoding performance compared to unimodal, self-supervised models, with accuracies approaching those of supervised decoders trained on labeled data. Next, we extend cross-modal decoder training to three or more modalities, achieving state-of-the-art neural decoding accuracy that matches or slightly exceeds the performance of supervised models. Significance: We demonstrate that cross-modal, self-supervised decoding can be applied to train neural decoders when few or no labels are available and extend the cross-modal framework to share information among three or more data streams, further improving self-supervised training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Peterson
- Biology, University of Washington, 4000 15th Ave NE, Seattle, Washington, 98195, UNITED STATES
| | - Rajesh P N Rao
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering College of Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352350, Seattle, Washington, 98195, UNITED STATES
| | - Bingni W Brunton
- University of Washington, 4000 15th Ave NE, Seattle, Washington, 98195, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robbins K, Truong D, Jones A, Callanan I, Makeig S. Building FAIR Functionality: Annotating Events in Time Series Data Using Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED). Neuroinformatics 2022; 20:463-481. [PMID: 34970709 PMCID: PMC9546996 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-021-09537-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Human electrophysiological and related time series data are often acquired in complex, event-rich environments. However, the resulting recorded brain or other dynamics are often interpreted in relation to more sparsely recorded or subsequently-noted events. Currently a substantial gap exists between the level of event description required by current digital data archiving standards and the level of annotation required for successful analysis of event-related data across studies, environments, and laboratories. Manifold challenges must be addressed, most prominently ontological clarity, vocabulary extensibility, annotation tool availability, and overall usability, to allow and promote sharing of data with an effective level of descriptive detail for labeled events. Motivating data authors to perform the work needed to adequately annotate their data is a key challenge. This paper describes new developments in the Hierarchical Event Descriptor (HED) system for addressing these issues. We recap the evolution of HED and its acceptance by the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) movement, describe the recent release of HED-3G, a third generation HED tools and design framework, and discuss directions for future development. Given consistent, sufficiently detailed, tool-enabled, field-relevant annotation of the nature of recorded events, prospects are bright for large-scale analysis and modeling of aggregated time series data, both in behavioral and brain imaging sciences and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Robbins
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas At San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Dung Truong
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Alexander Jones
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas At San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Ian Callanan
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas At San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Scott Makeig
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prado P, Birba A, Cruzat J, Santamaría-García H, Parra M, Moguilner S, Tagliazucchi E, Ibáñez A. Dementia ConnEEGtome: Towards multicentric harmonization of EEG connectivity in neurodegeneration. Int J Psychophysiol 2022; 172:24-38. [PMID: 34968581 PMCID: PMC9887537 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The proposal to use brain connectivity as a biomarker for dementia phenotyping can be potentiated by conducting large-scale multicentric studies using high-density electroencephalography (hd- EEG). Nevertheless, several barriers preclude the development of a systematic "ConnEEGtome" in dementia research. Here we review critical sources of variability in EEG connectivity studies, and provide general guidelines for multicentric protocol harmonization. We describe how results can be impacted by the choice for data acquisition, and signal processing workflows. The implementation of a particular processing pipeline is conditional upon assumptions made by researchers about the nature of EEG. Due to these assumptions, EEG connectivity metrics are typically applicable to restricted scenarios, e.g., to a particular neurocognitive disorder. "Ground truths" for the choice of processing workflow and connectivity analysis are impractical. Consequently, efforts should be directed to harmonizing experimental procedures, data acquisition, and the first steps of the preprocessing pipeline. Conducting multiple analyses of the same data and a proper integration of the results need to be considered in additional processing steps. Furthermore, instead of using a single connectivity measure, using a composite metric combining different connectivity measures brings a powerful strategy to scale up the replicability of multicentric EEG connectivity studies. These composite metrics can boost the predictive strength of diagnostic tools for dementia. Moreover, the implementation of multi-feature machine learning classification systems that include EEG-based connectivity analyses may help to exploit the potential of multicentric studies combining clinical-cognitive, molecular, genetics, and neuroimaging data towards a multi-dimensional characterization of the dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Prado
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Agustina Birba
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile,Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina,National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Josefina Cruzat
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Hernando Santamaría-García
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Medical School, Physiology and Psychiatry Departments, Memory and Cognition Center Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Mario Parra
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Moguilner
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile,Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina,Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco (UCSF), California, USA,Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Enzo Tagliazucchi
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile,Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Fisica de Buenos Aires (IFIBA -CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Agustín Ibáñez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile,Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina,National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina,Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco (UCSF), California, USA,Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland,Corresponding author at: Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago de Chile, Chile., (A. Ibáñez)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Robbins K, Truong D, Appelhoff S, Delorme A, Makeig S. Capturing the nature of events and event context using hierarchical event descriptors (HED). Neuroimage 2021; 245:118766. [PMID: 34848298 PMCID: PMC8925904 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Event-related data analysis plays a central role in EEG and MEG (MEEG) and other neuroimaging modalities including fMRI. Choices about which events to report and how to annotate their full natures significantly influence the value, reliability, and reproducibility of neuroimaging datasets for further analysis and meta- or mega-analysis. A powerful annotation strategy using the new third-generation formulation of the Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED) framework and tools (hedtags.org) combines robust event description with details of experiment design and metadata in a human-readable as well as machine-actionable form, making event annotation relevant to the full range of neuroimaging and other time series data. This paper considers the event design and annotation process using as a case study the well-known multi-subject, multimodal dataset of Wakeman and Henson made available by its authors as a Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) dataset (bids.neuroimaging.io). We propose a set of best practices and guidelines for event annotation integrated in a natural way into the BIDS metadata file architecture, examine the impact of event design decisions, and provide a working example of organizing events in MEEG and other neuroimaging data. We demonstrate how annotations using HED can document events occurring during neuroimaging experiments as well as their interrelationships, providing machine-actionable annotation enabling automated within- and across-experiment analysis and comparisons. We discuss the evolution of HED software tools and have made available an accompanying HED-annotated BIDS-formated edition of the MEEG data of the Wakeman and Henson dataset (openneuro.org, ds003645).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Robbins
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas San Antonio San Antonio, TX, United States.
| | - Dung Truong
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States
| | - Stefan Appelhoff
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arnaud Delorme
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States; Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Scott Makeig
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92903-0559, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bianchi L, Antonietti A, Bajwa G, Ferrante R, Mahmud M, Balachandran P. A functional BCI model by the IEEE P2731 working group: data storage and sharing. BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/2326263x.2021.1968632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Bianchi
- Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering Dept, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Antonietti
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Garima Bajwa
- Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, Capitol Technology University 11301 Springfield Road, Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Raffaele Ferrante
- Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering Dept, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mufti Mahmud
- Nottingham Trent University Clifton, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martínez-Cancino R, Delorme A, Truong D, Artoni F, Kreutz-Delgado K, Sivagnanam S, Yoshimoto K, Majumdar A, Makeig S. The open EEGLAB portal Interface: High-Performance computing with EEGLAB. Neuroimage 2021; 224:116778. [PMID: 32289453 PMCID: PMC8341158 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2019] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
EEGLAB signal processing environment is currently the leading open-source software for processing electroencephalographic (EEG) data. The Neuroscience Gateway (NSG, nsgportal.org) is a web and API-based portal allowing users to easily run a variety of neuroscience-related software on high-performance computing (HPC) resources in the U.S. XSEDE network. We have reported recently (Delorme et al., 2019) on the Open EEGLAB Portal expansion of the free NSG services to allow the neuroscience community to build and run MATLAB pipelines using the EEGLAB tool environment. We are now releasing an EEGLAB plug-in, nsgportal, that interfaces EEGLAB with NSG directly from within EEGLAB running on MATLAB on any personal lab computer. The plug-in features a flexible MATLAB graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to easily submit, interact with, and manage NSG jobs, and to retrieve and examine their results. Command line nsgportal tools supporting these GUI functionalities allow EEGLAB users and plug-in tool developers to build largely automated functions and workflows that include optional NSG job submission and processing. Here we present details on nsgportal implementation and documentation, provide user tutorials on example applications, and show sample test results comparing computation times using HPC versus laptop processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramón Martínez-Cancino
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California San Diego, USA.
| | - Arnaud Delorme
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, USA
| | - Dung Truong
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, USA
| | - Fiorenzo Artoni
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California San Diego, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Yoshimoto
- San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, USA
| | - Amitava Majumdar
- San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California San Diego, USA
| | - Scott Makeig
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Robbins KA, Touryan J, Mullen T, Kothe C, Bigdely-Shamlo N. How Sensitive Are EEG Results to Preprocessing Methods: A Benchmarking Study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2020; 28:1081-1090. [PMID: 32217478 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2020.2980223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Although several guidelines for best practices in EEG preprocessing have been released, even studies that strictly adhere to those guidelines contain considerable variation in the ways that the recommended methods are applied. An open question for researchers is how sensitive the results of EEG analyses are to variations in preprocessing methods and parameters. To address this issue, we analyze the effect of preprocessing methods on downstream EEG analysis using several simple signal and event-related measures. Signal measures include recording-level channel amplitudes, study-level channel amplitude dispersion, and recording spectral characteristics. Event-related methods include ERPs and ERSPs and their correlations across methods for a diverse set of stimulus events. Our analysis also assesses differences in residual signals both in the time and spectral domains after blink artifacts have been removed. Using fully automated pipelines, we evaluate these measures across 17 EEG studies for two ICA-based preprocessing approaches (LARG, MARA) plus two variations of Artifact Subspace Reconstruction (ASR). Although the general structure of the results is similar across these preprocessing methods, there are significant differences, particularly in the low-frequency spectral features and in the residuals left by blinks. These results argue for detailed reporting of processing details as suggested by most guidelines, but also for using a federation of automated processing pipelines and comparison tools to quantify effects of processing choices as part of the research reporting.
Collapse
|
12
|
Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features. Neuroimage 2020; 207:116054. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
13
|
Bigdely-Shamlo N, Touryan J, Ojeda A, Kothe C, Mullen T, Robbins K. Automated EEG mega-analysis I: Spectral and amplitude characteristics across studies. Neuroimage 2020; 207:116361. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
14
|
Huggins JE, Guger C, Aarnoutse E, Allison B, Anderson CW, Bedrick S, Besio W, Chavarriaga R, Collinger JL, Do AH, Herff C, Hohmann M, Kinsella M, Lee K, Lotte F, Müller-Putz G, Nijholt A, Pels E, Peters B, Putze F, Rupp R, Schalk G, Scott S, Tangermann M, Tubig P, Zander T. Workshops of the Seventh International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: Not Getting Lost in Translation. BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES 2019; 6:71-101. [PMID: 33033729 PMCID: PMC7539697 DOI: 10.1080/2326263x.2019.1697163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Seventh International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting was held May 21-25th, 2018 at the Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, California, United States. The interactive nature of this conference was embodied by 25 workshops covering topics in BCI (also called brain-machine interface) research. Workshops covered foundational topics such as hardware development and signal analysis algorithms, new and imaginative topics such as BCI for virtual reality and multi-brain BCIs, and translational topics such as clinical applications and ethical assumptions of BCI development. BCI research is expanding in the diversity of applications and populations for whom those applications are being developed. BCI applications are moving toward clinical readiness as researchers struggle with the practical considerations to make sure that BCI translational efforts will be successful. This paper summarizes each workshop, providing an overview of the topic of discussion, references for additional information, and identifying future issues for research and development that resulted from the interactions and discussion at the workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Huggins
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 325 East Eisenhower, Room 3017; Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-5744
| | - Christoph Guger
- g.tec medical engineering GmbH/Guger Technologies OG, Austria, Sierningstrasse 14, 4521 Schiedlberg, Austria
| | - Erik Aarnoutse
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Brendan Allison
- Dept. of Cognitive Science, Mail Code 0515, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, United States
| | - Charles W Anderson
- Department of Computer Science, Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Neurosience Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - Steven Bedrick
- Center for Spoken Language Understanding, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
| | - Walter Besio
- Department of Electrical, Computer, & Biomedical Engineering and Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA, CREmedical Corp. Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ricardo Chavarriaga
- Defitech Chair in Brain-Machine Interface (CNBI), Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne - EPFL, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer L Collinger
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Department of Veterans Affairs, 3520 5th Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213
| | - An H Do
- UC Irvine Brain Computer Interface Lab, Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine
| | - Christian Herff
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Hohmann
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Department for Empirical Inference, Max-Planck-Ring 4, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michelle Kinsella
- Oregon Health & Science University, Institute on Development & Disability, 707 SW Gaines St, #1290, Portland, OR 97239
| | - Kyuhwa Lee
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne-EPFL
| | - Fabien Lotte
- Inria Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, LaBRI (Univ. Bordeaux/CNRS/Bordeaux INP), 200 avenue de la vieille tour, 33405, Talence Cedex, France
| | | | - Anton Nijholt
- Faculty EEMCS, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Elmar Pels
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Betts Peters
- Oregon Health & Science University, Institute on Development & Disability, 707 SW Gaines St, #1290, Portland, OR 97239
| | - Felix Putze
- University of Bremen, Germany, Cognitive Systems Lab, University of Bremen, Enrique-Schmidt-Straße 5 (Cartesium), 28359 Bremen
| | - Rüdiger Rupp
- Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital
| | - Gerwin Schalk
- National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, NYS Dept. of Health, Dept. of Neurology, Albany Medical College, Dept. of Biomed. Sci., State Univ. of New York at Albany, Center for Medical Sciences 2003, 150 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York 12208
| | - Stephanie Scott
- Department of Media Communications, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - Michael Tangermann
- Brain State Decoding Lab, Cluster of Excellence BrainLinks-BrainTools, Computer Science Dept., University of Freiburg, Germany, Autonomous Intelligent Systems Lab, Computer Science Dept., University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Paul Tubig
- Department of Philosophy, Center for Neurotechnology, University of Washington, Savery Hall, Room 361, Seattle, WA 98195
| | - Thorsten Zander
- Team PhyPA, Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 7 Zander Laboratories B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wagner J, Martinez-Cancino R, Delorme A, Makeig S, Solis-Escalante T, Neuper C, Mueller-Putz G. High-density EEG mobile brain/body imaging data recorded during a challenging auditory gait pacing task. Sci Data 2019; 6:211. [PMID: 31624252 PMCID: PMC6797727 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0223-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this report we present a mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) dataset that allows study of source-resolved cortical dynamics supporting coordinated gait movements in a rhythmic auditory cueing paradigm. Use of an auditory pacing stimulus stream has been recommended to identify deficits and treat gait impairments in neurologic populations. Here, the rhythmic cueing paradigm required healthy young participants to walk on a treadmill (constant speed) while attempting to maintain step synchrony with an auditory pacing stream and to adapt their step length and rate to unanticipated shifts in tempo of the pacing stimuli (e.g., sudden shifts to a faster or slower tempo). High-density electroencephalography (EEG, 108 channels), surface electromyography (EMG, bilateral tibialis anterior), pressure sensors on the heel (to register timing of heel strikes), and goniometers (knee, hip, and ankle joint angles) were concurrently recorded in 20 participants. The data is provided in the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) format to promote data sharing and reuse, and allow the inclusion of the data into fully automated data analysis workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Wagner
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- Laboratory for Brain Computer Interfaces, Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
| | - Ramon Martinez-Cancino
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Electric and Computer Engineering Department, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Arnaud Delorme
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Scott Makeig
- Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Teodoro Solis-Escalante
- Laboratory for Brain Computer Interfaces, Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christa Neuper
- Laboratory for Brain Computer Interfaces, Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
- Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gernot Mueller-Putz
- Laboratory for Brain Computer Interfaces, Institute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pernet CR, Appelhoff S, Gorgolewski KJ, Flandin G, Phillips C, Delorme A, Oostenveld R. EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Sci Data 2019; 6:103. [PMID: 31239435 PMCID: PMC6592877 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) project is a rapidly evolving effort in the human brain imaging research community to create standards allowing researchers to readily organize and share study data within and between laboratories. Here we present an extension to BIDS for electroencephalography (EEG) data, EEG-BIDS, along with tools and references to a series of public EEG datasets organized using this new standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyril R Pernet
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
| | - Stefan Appelhoff
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | - Arnaud Delorme
- Swart Center for Computational Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- CerCo, CNRS/Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Robert Oostenveld
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Krol LR, Pawlitzki J, Lotte F, Gramann K, Zander TO. SEREEGA: Simulating event-related EEG activity. J Neurosci Methods 2018; 309:13-24. [PMID: 30114381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electroencephalography (EEG) is a popular method to monitor brain activity, but it is difficult to evaluate EEG-based analysis methods because no ground-truth brain activity is available for comparison. Therefore, in order to test and evaluate such methods, researchers often use simulated EEG data instead of actual EEG recordings. Simulated data can be used, among other things, to assess or compare signal processing and machine learning algorithms, to model EEG variabilities, and to design source reconstruction methods. NEW METHOD We present SEREEGA, Simulating Event-Related EEG Activity. SEREEGA is a free and open-source MATLAB-based toolbox dedicated to the generation of simulated epochs of EEG data. It is modular and extensible, at initial release supporting five different publicly available head models and capable of simulating multiple different types of signals mimicking brain activity. This paper presents the architecture and general workflow of this toolbox, as well as a simulated data set demonstrating some of its functions. The toolbox is available at https://github.com/lrkrol/SEREEGA. RESULTS The simulated data allows established analysis pipelines and classification methods to be applied and is capable of producing realistic results. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS Most simulated EEG is coded from scratch. The few open-source methods in existence focus on specific applications or signal types, such as connectivity. SEREEGA unifies the majority of past simulation methods reported in the literature into one toolbox. CONCLUSION SEREEGA is a general-purpose toolbox to simulate ground-truth EEG data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens R Krol
- Team PhyPA, Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Juliane Pawlitzki
- Team PhyPA, Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Zander Laboratories B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fabien Lotte
- Inria, LaBRI (CNRS/University of Bordeaux/Bordeaux INP), Talence, France
| | - Klaus Gramann
- Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Centre of Artificial Intelligence, School of Software, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Australia; Center for Advanced Neurological Engineering, University of California San Diego, USA
| | - Thorsten O Zander
- Team PhyPA, Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Zander Laboratories B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Robbins K, Su KM, Hairston WD. An 18-subject EEG data collection using a visual-oddball task, designed for benchmarking algorithms and headset performance comparisons. Data Brief 2017; 16:227-230. [PMID: 29226211 PMCID: PMC5712810 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This data note describes an 18-subject EEG (electroencephalogram) data collection from an experiment in which subjects performed a standard visual oddball task. Several research projects have used this data to test artifact detection, classification, transfer learning, EEG preprocessing, blink detection, and automated annotation algorithms. We are releasing the data in three formats to enable benchmarking of EEG algorithms in many areas. The data was acquired using a Biosemi Active 2 EEG headset and includes 64 channels of EEG, 4 channels of EOG (electrooculogram), and 2 mastoid reference channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Robbins
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
| | - Kyung-Min Su
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
| | - W David Hairston
- Human Research and Engineering Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Puce A, Hämäläinen MS. A Review of Issues Related to Data Acquisition and Analysis in EEG/MEG Studies. Brain Sci 2017; 7:E58. [PMID: 28561761 PMCID: PMC5483631 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci7060058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Revised: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive electrophysiological methods, which record electric potentials and magnetic fields due to electric currents in synchronously-active neurons. With MEG being more sensitive to neural activity from tangential currents and EEG being able to detect both radial and tangential sources, the two methods are complementary. Over the years, neurophysiological studies have changed considerably: high-density recordings are becoming de rigueur; there is interest in both spontaneous and evoked activity; and sophisticated artifact detection and removal methods are available. Improved head models for source estimation have also increased the precision of the current estimates, particularly for EEG and combined EEG/MEG. Because of their complementarity, more investigators are beginning to perform simultaneous EEG/MEG studies to gain more complete information about neural activity. Given the increase in methodological complexity in EEG/MEG, it is important to gather data that are of high quality and that are as artifact free as possible. Here, we discuss some issues in data acquisition and analysis of EEG and MEG data. Practical considerations for different types of EEG and MEG studies are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aina Puce
- Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 East 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
| | - Matti S Hämäläinen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
| |
Collapse
|