1
|
Pernia M, Kar M, Montes-Lourido P, Sadagopan S. Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs. J Vis Exp 2023:10.3791/64581. [PMID: 36688548 PMCID: PMC9929667 DOI: 10.3791/64581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Noise exposure is a leading cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Animal models of noise-induced hearing loss have generated mechanistic insight into the underlying anatomical and physiological pathologies of hearing loss. However, relating behavioral deficits observed in humans with hearing loss to behavioral deficits in animal models remains challenging. Here, pupillometry is proposed as a method that will enable the direct comparison of animal and human behavioral data. The method is based on a modified oddball paradigm - habituating the subject to the repeated presentation of a stimulus and intermittently presenting a deviant stimulus that varies in some parametric fashion from the repeated stimulus. The fundamental premise is that if the change between the repeated and deviant stimulus is detected by the subject, it will trigger a pupil dilation response that is larger than that elicited by the repeated stimulus. This approach is demonstrated using a vocalization categorization task in guinea pigs, an animal model widely used in auditory research, including in hearing loss studies. By presenting vocalizations from one vocalization category as standard stimuli and a second category as oddball stimuli embedded in noise at various signal-to-noise ratios, it is demonstrated that the magnitude of pupil dilation in response to the oddball category varies monotonically with the signal-to-noise ratio. Growth curve analyses can then be used to characterize the time course and statistical significance of these pupil dilation responses. In this protocol, detailed procedures for acclimating guinea pigs to the setup, conducting pupillometry, and evaluating/analyzing data are described. Although this technique is demonstrated in normal-hearing guinea pigs in this protocol, the method may be used to assess the sensory effects of various forms of hearing loss within each subject. These effects may then be correlated with concurrent electrophysiological measures and post-hoc anatomical observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianny Pernia
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Manaswini Kar
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh; Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Pilar Montes-Lourido
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Transfer and Innovation, USC University Hospital Complex (CHUS), University of Santiago de Compostela
| | - Srivatsun Sadagopan
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh; Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montes-Lourido P, Kar M, Pernia M, Parida S, Sadagopan S. Updates to the guinea pig animal model for in-vivo auditory neuroscience in the low-frequency hearing range. Hear Res 2022; 424:108603. [PMID: 36099806 PMCID: PMC9922531 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
For gaining insight into general principles of auditory processing, it is critical to choose model organisms whose set of natural behaviors encompasses the processes being investigated. This reasoning has led to the development of a variety of animal models for auditory neuroscience research, such as guinea pigs, gerbils, chinchillas, rabbits, and ferrets; but in recent years, the availability of cutting-edge molecular tools and other methodologies in the mouse model have led to waning interest in these unique model species. As laboratories increasingly look to include in-vivo components in their research programs, a comprehensive description of procedures and techniques for applying some of these modern neuroscience tools to a non-mouse small animal model would enable researchers to leverage unique model species that may be best suited for testing their specific hypotheses. In this manuscript, we describe in detail the methods we have developed to apply these tools to the guinea pig animal model to answer questions regarding the neural processing of complex sounds, such as vocalizations. We describe techniques for vocalization acquisition, behavioral testing, recording of auditory brainstem responses and frequency-following responses, intracranial neural signals including local field potential and single unit activity, and the expression of transgenes allowing for optogenetic manipulation of neural activity, all in awake and head-fixed guinea pigs. We demonstrate the rich datasets at the behavioral and electrophysiological levels that can be obtained using these techniques, underscoring the guinea pig as a versatile animal model for studying complex auditory processing. More generally, the methods described here are applicable to a broad range of small mammals, enabling investigators to address specific auditory processing questions in model organisms that are best suited for answering them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Montes-Lourido
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Manaswini Kar
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marianny Pernia
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Satyabrata Parida
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Srivatsun Sadagopan
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao R, Ma C, Wang M, Li X, Liu W, Shi L, Yu N. Killer or helper? The mechanism underlying the role of adenylate activated kinase in sound conditioning. Front Synaptic Neurosci 2022; 14:940788. [PMID: 36160917 PMCID: PMC9490174 DOI: 10.3389/fnsyn.2022.940788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate whether sound conditioning influences auditory system protection by activating adenylate activated kinase (AMPK), and if such adaption protects ribbon synapses from high-intensity noise exposure.Materials and methodsCBA mice (12 weeks old) were randomly divided into four groups (n = 24 mice per group): control, sound conditioning (SC), sound conditioning plus noise exposure (SC+NE), and noise exposure (NE). Hearing thresholds were assessed before testing, after sound conditioning, and 0, 3, 7, and 14 days after 110 dB noise exposure. Amplitudes and latencies of wave I at 90 dB intensity were assessed before test, after conditioning, and at 0 and 14 days after 110 dB noise exposure. One cochlea from each mouse was subjected to immunofluorescence staining to assess synapse numbers and AMPK activation, while the other cochlea was analyzed for phosphorylated adenylate activated kinase (p-AMPK) protein expression by western blot.ResultsThere was no significant difference in auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold between SC and control mice. The degree of hearing loss of animals in the two SC groups was significantly reduced compared to the NE group after 110 dB noise exposure. Animals in the SC group showed faster recovery to normal thresholds, and 65 dB SPL sound conditioning had a stronger auditory protection effect. After sound conditioning, the amplitude of ABR I wave in the SC group was higher than that in the control group. Immediately after noise exposure (D0), the amplitudes of ABR I wave decreased significantly in all groups; the most significant decrease was in the NE group, with amplitude in 65SC+NE group significantly higher than that in the 85SC+NE group. Wave I latency in the SC group was significantly shorter than that in the control group. At D0, latency was prolonged in the NE group compared with the control group. In contrast, there was no significant difference in latency between the 65SC+NE and 85SC+NE groups. Further, at D14, there was no significant difference between the NE and control groups, while latency remained significantly shorter in the 65SC+NE and 85SC+NE groups compared with controls. Number of ribbon synapses in SC mice did not differ significantly from that in controls. After 110 dB noise exposure, there were significantly more ribbon synapses in the SC+NE group than the NE group. Ribbon synapses of all groups were recovered 14 days after the noise exposure, while the SC group had a shorter recovery time than the non-SC groups (p < 0.05). AMPK was highly activated in the SC group, and p-AMPK expression was detected; however, after 110 dB noise exposure, the strongest protein expression was detected in the NE group, followed by the SC+NE groups, and the lowest protein expression was detected in the control group.ConclusionSound conditioning animals were more noise resistant and recovered hearing faster than non-SC animals. Further, 65 dB SPL SC offered better hearing protection than 85 dB SPL SC. Early AMPK activation may protect hearing by increasing ATP storage and reducing the release of large quantities of p-AMPK, which could help to inhibit synapse damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zhao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Changhong Ma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Minjun Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xinxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Lin Shi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
- *Correspondence: Lin Shi,
| | - Ning Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases, The Sixth Medical Center of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, State Key Lab of Hearing Science, Beijing Key Lab of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Beijing, China
- Ning Yu,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xia L, Ripley S, Jiang Z, Yin X, Yu Z, Aiken SJ, Wang J. Synaptopathy in Guinea Pigs Induced by Noise Mimicking Human Experience and Associated Changes in Auditory Signal Processing. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:935371. [PMID: 35873820 PMCID: PMC9298651 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.935371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Noise induced synaptopathy (NIS) has been researched extensively since a large amount of synaptic loss without permanent threshold shift (PTS) was found in CBA mice after a brief noise exposure. However, efforts to translate these results to humans have met with little success—and might not be possible since noise exposure used in laboratory animals is generally different from what is experienced by human subjects in real life. An additional problem is a lack of morphological data and reliable functional methods to quantify loss of afferent synapses in humans. Based on evidence for disproportionate synaptic loss for auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) with low spontaneous rates (LSR), coding-in-noise deficits (CIND) have been speculated to be the major difficulty associated with NIS without PTS. However, no robust evidence for this is available in humans or animals. This has led to a re-examination of the role of LSR ANFs in signal coding in high-level noise. The fluctuation profile model has been proposed to support a role for high-SR ANFs in the coding of high-level noise in combination with efferent control of cochlear gain. This study aimed to induce NIS by a low-level, intermittent noise exposure mimicking what is experienced in human life and examined the impact of the NIS on temporal processing under masking. It also evaluated the role of temporal fluctuation in evoking efferent feedback and the effects of NIS on this feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Xia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | - Sara Ripley
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Zhenhua Jiang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | - Xue Yin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | - Zhiping Yu
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Steve J Aiken
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China.,School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Wu C, Chen T, Shen Q, Xiong Y, Chen Z, Li C. Evaluation of acoustic changes in and the healing outcomes of rat eardrums with pars tensa and pars flaccida perforations. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2022; 7:816-824. [PMID: 35734049 PMCID: PMC9194967 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To systematically explore the differences in acoustic changes and healing outcomes of tympanic membranes (TMs) with pars flaccida perforation (PFP) and pars tensa perforation (PTP). Methods We created PFPs and PTPs of various sizes in Sprague-Dawley rats, and evaluated TM umbo velocity and hearing function using laser Doppler vibrometry and auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurement before and immediately after perforation. Two weeks later, hearing was reevaluated and TMs were investigated by immunohistochemical staining. Results Small PFPs and PTPs did not significantly affect umbo velocity and hearing function. Large PFPs increased umbo velocity loss at low frequency (1.5 kHz) and elevated ABR thresholds within 1-2 kHz. Large PTP caused significant velocity loss at low frequencies from 1.5 to 3.5 kHz and threshold elevations at full frequencies (1-2 kHz). Two weeks after the perforation, the hearing function of rats with healed PFPs recovered completely. However, high-frequency hearing loss (16-32 kHz) persisted in rats with healed PTPs. Morphological staining revealed that no increase in the thickness and obvious increase in collagen I level of regenerated par flaccida; regenerated pars tensa exhibited obvious increase in thickness and increased collagen I, while the collagen II regeneration was limited with discontinuous and disordered structure in regenerated pars tensa. Conclusion The hearing loss caused by large PFP limits at low frequencies while large PTP can lead to hearing loss at wide range frequencies. PFP and PTP have different functional outcomes after spontaneous healing, which is determined by the discrepant structure reconstruction and collagen regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaoqian Liu
- Otolaryngology Research InstituteShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Cuiping Wu
- Otolaryngology Research InstituteShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Tingting Chen
- Department of Hearing and Language RehabilitationZhejiang Chinese Medicine UniversityHangzhouChina
| | - Qiyue Shen
- Department of Hearing and Language RehabilitationShanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yuanping Xiong
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityNanchangChina
| | - Zhengnong Chen
- Otolaryngology Research InstituteShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalShanghaiChina
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Chunyan Li
- Otolaryngology Research InstituteShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalShanghaiChina
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryShanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's HospitalShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harrison RT, DeBacker JR, Trevino M, Bielefeld EC, Lobarinas E. Cochlear Preconditioning as a Modulator of Susceptibility to Hearing Loss. Antioxid Redox Signal 2022; 36:1215-1228. [PMID: 34011160 DOI: 10.1089/ars.2021.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Significance: Acquired sensorineural hearing loss is a major public health problem worldwide. The leading causes of sensorineural hearing loss are noise, aging, and ototoxic medications, with the key underlying pathology being damage to the cochlea. The review focuses on the phenomenon of preconditioning, in which the susceptibility to cochlear injury is reduced by exposing the ear to a stressful stimulus. Recent Advances: Cochlear conditioning has focused on the use of mono-modal conditioning, specifically conditioning the cochlea with moderate noise exposures before a traumatic exposure that causes permanent hearing loss. Recently, cross-modal conditioning has been explored more thoroughly, to prevent not only noise-induced hearing loss, but also age-related and drug-induced hearing losses. Critical Issues: Noise exposures that cause only temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) can cause long-term synaptopathy, injury to the synapses between the inner hair cells and spiral ganglion cells. This discovery has the potential to significantly alter the field of cochlear preconditioning with noise. Further, cochlear preconditioning can be the gateway to the development of clinically deployable therapeutics. Therefore, understanding the underlying mechanisms of conditioning is crucial for optimizing clinical protection against sensorineural hearing loss. Future Directions: Before the discovery of synaptopathy, noise exposures that caused only TTSs were believed to be either harmless or potentially beneficial. Any considerations of preconditioning with noise must consider the potential for injury to the synapses. Further, the discovery of different methods to precondition the cochlea against injury will yield new avenues for protection against hearing loss in the vulnerable populations. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 1215-1228.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Harrison
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - J Riley DeBacker
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Monica Trevino
- Callier Center for Communication Disorders, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Eric C Bielefeld
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Edward Lobarinas
- Callier Center for Communication Disorders, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ripley S, Xia L, Zhang Z, Aiken SJ, Wang J. Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:893542. [PMID: 35720689 PMCID: PMC9199355 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.893542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Noise induced synaptopathy (NIS) and hidden hearing loss (NIHHL) have been hot topic in hearing research since a massive synaptic loss was identified in CBA mice after a brief noise exposure that did not cause permanent threshold shift (PTS) in 2009. Based upon the amount of synaptic loss and the bias of it to synapses with a group of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) with low spontaneous rate (LSR), coding-in-noise deficit (CIND) has been speculated as the major difficult of hearing in subjects with NIS and NIHHL. This speculation is based upon the idea that the coding of sound at high level against background noise relies mainly on the LSR ANFs. However, the translation from animal data to humans for NIS remains to be justified due to the difference in noise exposure between laboratory animals and human subjects in real life, the lack of morphological data and reliable functional methods to quantify or estimate the loss of the afferent synapses by noise. Moreover, there is no clear, robust data revealing the CIND even in animals with the synaptic loss but no PTS. In humans, both positive and negative reports are available. The difficulty in verifying CINDs has led a re-examination of the hypothesis that CIND is the major deficit associated with NIS and NIHHL, and the theoretical basis of this idea on the role of LSR ANFs. This review summarized the current status of research in NIS and NIHHL, with focus on the translational difficulty from animal data to human clinicals, the technical difficulties in quantifying NIS in humans, and the problems with the SR theory on signal coding. Temporal fluctuation profile model was discussed as a potential alternative for signal coding at high sound level against background noise, in association with the mechanisms of efferent control on the cochlea gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ripley
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Li Xia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Steve J. Aiken
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jian Wang
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malfatti T, Ciralli B, Hilscher MM, Leao RN, Leao KE. Decreasing dorsal cochlear nucleus activity ameliorates noise-induced tinnitus perception in mice. BMC Biol 2022; 20:102. [PMID: 35550106 PMCID: PMC9097071 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-022-01288-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) is a region known to integrate somatosensory and auditory inputs and is identified as a potential key structure in the generation of phantom sound perception, especially noise-induced tinnitus. Yet, how altered homeostatic plasticity of the DCN induces and maintains the sensation of tinnitus is not clear. Here, we chemogenetically decrease activity of a subgroup of DCN neurons, Ca2+/Calmodulin kinase 2 α (CaMKII α)-positive DCN neurons, using Gi-coupled human M4 Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (hM4Di DREADDs), to investigate their role in noise-induced tinnitus. Results Mice were exposed to loud noise (9–11kHz, 90dBSPL, 1h, followed by 2h of silence), and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and gap prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle (GPIAS) were recorded 2 days before and 2 weeks after noise exposure to identify animals with a significantly decreased inhibition of startle, indicating tinnitus but without permanent hearing loss. Neuronal activity of CaMKII α+ neurons expressing hM4Di in the DCN was lowered by administration of clozapine-N-oxide (CNO). We found that acutely decreasing firing rate of CaMKII α+ DCN units decrease tinnitus-like responses (p = 3e −3, n = 11 mice), compared to the control group that showed no improvement in GPIAS (control virus; CaMKII α-YFP + CNO, p = 0.696, n = 7 mice). Extracellular recordings confirmed CNO to decrease unit firing frequency of CaMKII α-hM4Di+ mice and alter best frequency and tuning width of response to sound. However, these effects were not seen if CNO had been previously administered during the noise exposure (n = 6 experimental and 6 control mice). Conclusion We found that lowering DCN activity in mice displaying tinnitus-related behavior reduces tinnitus, but lowering DCN activity during noise exposure does not prevent noise-induced tinnitus. Our results suggest that CaMKII α-positive cells in the DCN are not crucial for tinnitus induction but play a significant role in maintaining tinnitus perception in mice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12915-022-01288-1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thawann Malfatti
- Hearing and Neuronal activity Lab, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
| | - Barbara Ciralli
- Hearing and Neuronal activity Lab, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
| | - Markus M Hilscher
- Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richardson N Leao
- Hearing and Neuronal activity Lab, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
| | - Katarina E Leao
- Hearing and Neuronal activity Lab, Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hendrix CL, Thomason ME. A survey of protocols from 54 infant and toddler neuroimaging research labs. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2022; 54:101060. [PMID: 35033971 PMCID: PMC8762357 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Infant and toddler MRI enables unprecedented insight into the developing brain. However, consensus about optimal data collection practices is lacking, which slows growth of the field and impedes replication efforts. The goal of this study was to collect systematic data across a large number of infant/toddler research laboratories to better understand preferred practices. Survey data addressed MRI acquisition strategies, scan success rates, visit preparations, scanning protocols, accommodations for families, study design, and policies regarding incidental findings. Respondents had on average 8 years' experience in early life neuroimaging and represented more than fifty research laboratories. Areas of consensus across labs included higher success rates among newborns compared to older infants or toddlers, high rates of data loss across age groups, endorsement of multiple layers of hearing protection, and age-specific scan preparation and participant accommodation. Researchers remain divided on decisions in longitudinal study design and practices regarding incidental findings. This study summarizes practices honed over years of work by a large collection of scientists, which may serve as an important resource for those new to the field. The ability to reference data about best practices facilitates future harmonization, data sharing, and reproducibility, all of which advance this important frontier in developmental science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra L Hendrix
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Moriah E Thomason
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Population Health, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Neuroscience Institute, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noise exposure levels predict blood levels of the inner ear protein prestin. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1154. [PMID: 35064195 PMCID: PMC8783004 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05131-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Serological biomarkers of inner ear proteins are a promising new approach for studying human hearing. Here, we focus on the serological measurement of prestin, a protein integral to a human’s highly sensitive hearing, expressed in cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs). Building from recent nonhuman studies that associated noise-induced OHC trauma with reduced serum prestin levels, and studies suggesting subclinical hearing damage in humans regularly engaging in noisy activities, we investigated the relation between serum prestin levels and environmental noise levels in young adults with normal clinical audiograms. We measured prestin protein levels from circulating blood and collected noise level data multiple times over the course of the experiment using body-worn sound recorders. Results indicate that serum prestin levels have a negative relation with noise exposure: individuals with higher routine noise exposure levels tended to have lower prestin levels. Moreover, when grouping participants based on their risk for a clinically-significant noise-induced hearing loss, we found that prestin levels differed significantly between groups, even though behavioral hearing thresholds were similar. We discuss possible interpretations for our findings including whether lower serum levels may reflect subclinical levels of OHC damage, or possibly an adaptive, protective mechanism in which prestin expression is downregulated in response to loud environments.
Collapse
|
11
|
Xiao L, Sun Y, Liu C, Zheng Z, Shen Y, Xia L, Yang G, Feng Y. Molecular Behavior of HMGB1 in the Cochlea Following Noise Exposure and in vitro. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:642946. [PMID: 33732708 PMCID: PMC7959764 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.642946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is characterized by cellular damage to the inner ear, which is exacerbated by inflammation. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a representative damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), acts as a mediator of inflammation or an intercellular messenger according to its cellular localization. Blocking or regulating HMGB1 offers an attractive approach in ameliorating NIHL. However, the precise therapeutic intervention must be based on a deeper understanding of its dynamic molecular distribution and function in cochlear pathogenesis after acoustic trauma. Here, we have presented the spatiotemporal dynamics of the expression of HMGB1, exhibiting distribution variability in specific cochlear regions and cells following noise exposure. After gene manipulation, we further investigated the characteristics of cellular HMGB1 in HEI-OC1 cells. The higher cell viability observed in the HMGB1 knocked-down group after stimulation with H2O2 indicated the possible negative effect of HMGB1 on cellular lifespan. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that HMGB1 is involved in NIHL pathogenesis and its molecular biology has essential and subtle influences, preserving a translational potential for pharmacological intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Xiao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Sun
- Zhangjiagang TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Zhangjiagang, China
| | - Chengqi Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhong Zheng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Shen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Xia
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| | - Guang Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanmei Feng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Sleep Disordered Breathing, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|