1
|
Zeng M, Verma V, Chen X, Li S, Sun Y, Liu G, Tian X, Zhang D, Li J, Liu Y, Liao X, Liu Y, Wang L, Wang X, Shi H, Li B, Xue B, Luo X. Stereotactic radiotherapy vs whole brain radiation therapy in EGFR mutated NSCLC: Results & reflections from the prematurely closed phase III HYBRID trial. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110334. [PMID: 38801945 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND All known randomized trials of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) versus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) comprise mixed histologies. The phase III HYBRID trial (NCT02882984) attempted to evaluate the non-inferiority of SRT vs. WBRT specifically for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC) BMs. METHODS Inclusion criteria were ≤ 5 BMs (any size) from treatment-naïve EGFRm NSCLC. All patients started a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor on the first day of WBRT (37.5 Gy/15 fractions) or SRT (25-40 Gy/5 fractions per tumor volume). The primary endpoint was 18-month intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS; intention-to-treat). RESULTS The trial commenced in June 2015 and was closed in April 2021 after screening 208 patients but enrolling 85 (n = 41 WBRT, n = 44 SRT; median follow-up 31 and 36 months, respectively). Respectively, 9.5 % vs. 10.2 % of patients experienced intracranial progression at 18 months, and the median iPFS was 21.4 vs. 22.3 months (p > 0.05 for all). The SRT arm experienced higher overall survival and cognitive preservation (p < 0.05 for all). The most notable reason for low enrollment was patients not wishing to risk neurocognitive decline from WBRT. CONCLUSIONS Although this phase III trial was underpowered, there was no evidence that SRT yielded outcome detriments compared to WBRT for EGFRm NSCLC BMs. Lessons from prematurely closed trials are valuable, as they often provide important experiential perspectives for investigators designing/executing future trials. In the current era, randomized trials involving WBRT without cognitive sparing measures may be at high risk of underaccrual; trial investigators are encouraged to carefully consider our experience when attempting to design such trials. However, trials of molecular-/biologically-stratified patients are highly recommended as the notion of "individualized medicine/oncology" continues to expand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zeng
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xue Chen
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Simin Li
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yongliang Sun
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Guotao Liu
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xiaoman Tian
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Deng Zhang
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jingqiu Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 South Renmin Ave, Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 55 South Renmin Ave, Fourth Section, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xingyu Liao
- Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yingyi Liu
- Department of Oncology, 416 Hospital, North Fourth Section of the Second Ring Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, No. 96, Shangshahepu Street, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, No. 96, Shangshahepu Street, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Huibing Shi
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, No. 96, Shangshahepu Street, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bin Li
- Cancer Center, Sichuan Taikang Hospital, Tianfu New Area, #881 Xiang He First Street, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Binyue Xue
- Department of Oncology, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, No. 96, Shangshahepu Street, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xing Luo
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China; Clinical Medical School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baston C, Parosanu AI, Stanciu IM, Nitipir C. Metastatic Kidney Cancer: Does the Location of the Metastases Matter? Moving towards Personalized Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1111. [PMID: 38791072 PMCID: PMC11117570 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been revolutionized over the past two decades with several practice-changing treatments. Treatment for RCC often requires a multimodal approach: Local treatment, such as surgery or ablation, is typically recommended for patients with localized tumors, while stage IV cancers often require both local and systemic therapy. The treatment of advanced RCC heavily relies on immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which are highly contingent upon histological subtypes. Despite years of research on biomarkers for RCC, the standard of care is to choose systemic therapy based on the risk profile according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre models. However, many questions still need to be answered. Should we consider metastatic sites when deciding on treatment options for metastatic RCC? How do we choose between dual immunotherapy and combinations of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors? This review article aims to answer these unresolved questions surrounding the concept of personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalin Baston
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Sanitary Heroes Boulevard, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (I.-M.S.); (C.N.)
- Department of Urology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea Ioana Parosanu
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Sanitary Heroes Boulevard, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (I.-M.S.); (C.N.)
- Department of Oncology, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana-Miruna Stanciu
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Sanitary Heroes Boulevard, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (I.-M.S.); (C.N.)
- Department of Oncology, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cornelia Nitipir
- Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Sanitary Heroes Boulevard, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (I.-M.S.); (C.N.)
- Department of Oncology, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prebble AR, Latka B, Burdekin B, Leary D, Harris M, Regan D, Boss MK. Investigation of Gastrointestinal Toxicities Associated with Concurrent Abdominal Radiation Therapy and the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sunitinib in a Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1838. [PMID: 38339116 PMCID: PMC10855812 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be combined with radiation therapy (RT) to enhance tumor control; however, increased incidences of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity have been reported with this combination. We hypothesize that toxicity is due to compromised intestinal healing caused by inhibition of vascular repair and proliferation pathways. This study explores underlying tissue toxicity associated with abdominal RT and concurrent sunitinib in a mouse model. Four groups of CD-1 mice were treated with 12 Gy abdominal RT, oral sunitinib, abdominal RT + sunitinib, or sham treatment. Mice received oral sunitinib or the vehicle via gavage for 14 days. On day 7, mice were irradiated with 12 Gy abdominal RT or sham treated. Mice were euthanized on day 14 and intestinal tract was harvested for semiquantitative histopathologic evaluation and immunohistochemical quantification of proliferation (Ki67) and vascular density (CD31). Non-irradiated groups had stable weights while abdominal irradiation resulted in weight loss, with mice receiving RT + SUN having greater weight loss than mice receiving RT alone. Semiquantitative analysis showed significant increases in inflammation in irradiated groups. The difference in the density of CD31+ cells was significantly increased in RT alone compared to SUN alone. Ki67+ density was not significant. In summary, we identify a lack of angiogenic response in irradiated GI tissues when abdominal RT is combined with a TKI, which may correlate with clinical toxicities seen in canine and human patients receiving combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber R. Prebble
- Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA;
| | - Bailey Latka
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA (B.B.)
| | - Braden Burdekin
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA (B.B.)
| | - Del Leary
- Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA;
| | - Mac Harris
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; (M.H.); (D.R.)
| | - Daniel Regan
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; (M.H.); (D.R.)
| | - Mary-Keara Boss
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA (B.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Semenescu LE, Kamel A, Ciubotaru V, Baez-Rodriguez SM, Furtos M, Costachi A, Dricu A, Tătăranu LG. An Overview of Systemic Targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma, with a Focus on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2023; 45:7680-7704. [PMID: 37754269 PMCID: PMC10528141 DOI: 10.3390/cimb45090485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The most commonly diagnosed malignancy of the urinary system is represented by renal cell carcinoma. Various subvariants of RCC were described, with a clear-cell type prevailing in about 85% of all RCC tumors. Patients with metastases from renal cell carcinoma did not have many effective therapies until the end of the 1980s, as long as hormonal therapy and chemotherapy were the only options available. The outcomes were unsatisfactory due to the poor effectiveness of the available therapeutic options, but then interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 showed treatment effectiveness, providing benefits but only for less than half of the patients. However, it was not until 2004 that targeted therapies emerged, prolonging the survival rate. Currently, new technologies and strategies are being developed to improve the actual efficacy of available treatments and their prognostic aspects. This article summarizes the mechanisms of action, importance, benefits, adverse events of special interest, and efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Eleonora Semenescu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2-4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.C.)
| | - Amira Kamel
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (A.K.); (V.C.); (S.M.B.-R.); (L.G.T.)
| | - Vasile Ciubotaru
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (A.K.); (V.C.); (S.M.B.-R.); (L.G.T.)
| | - Silvia Mara Baez-Rodriguez
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (A.K.); (V.C.); (S.M.B.-R.); (L.G.T.)
| | - Mircea Furtos
- Neurosurgical Department, University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 050098 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Alexandra Costachi
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2-4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.C.)
| | - Anica Dricu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2-4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.C.)
| | - Ligia Gabriela Tătăranu
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (A.K.); (V.C.); (S.M.B.-R.); (L.G.T.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 020022 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Internò V, Massari F, Rudà R, Maiorano BA, Caffo O, Procopio G, Bracarda S, Atzori F, Passarelli A, Bersanelli M, Stellato M, Fornarini G, Galli L, Ortega C, Zanardi E, Incorvaia L, Facchini G, Giron Berrios JR, Ricotta R, Santoni M, Funaioli C, Trerotoli P, Porta C, Rizzo M. An Italian multicenter retrospective real-life analysis of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the BMRCC study. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101598. [PMID: 37467658 PMCID: PMC10485397 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of patients with brain-spread renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an unmet clinical need, although more recent therapeutic strategies have significantly improved RCC patients' life expectancy. Our multicenter, retrospective, observational study investigated a real-world cohort of patients with brain metastases (BM) from RCC (BMRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 226 patients with histological diagnosis of RCC and radiological evidence of BM from 22 Italian institutions were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate models were performed to investigate the impact of clinicopathological features and multimodal treatments on both overall survival (OS) from the BM diagnosis and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). RESULTS The median OS from the BM diagnosis was 18.8 months (interquartile range: 6.2-43 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed the following as positive independent prognostic factors: a Karnofsky Performance Status >70% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.92, P = 0.0026] and a single BM (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.86, P = 0. 0310); in contrast, the following were confirmed as worse prognosis factors: progressive extracranial disease (HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.003-2.74, P = 0.00181) and only one line of systemic therapy after the BM occurrence (HR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.62-5.49, P = 0.029). Subgroup analyses showed no difference in iPFS according to the type of the first systemic treatment [immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT)] carried out after the BM diagnosis (HR = 1.033, 95% CI 0.565-1.889, P = 0.16), and revealed that external radiation therapy (eRT) significantly prolonged iPFS when combined with IT (10.7 months, 95% CI 4.9-48 months, P = 0.0321) and not when combined with TT (9.01 months, 95% CI 2.7-21.2 months, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a potential additive effect in terms of iPFS for eRT combined with IT and encourage a more intensive multimodal therapeutic strategy in a multidisciplinary context to improve the survival of BMRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Internò
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - F Massari
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B A Maiorano
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - O Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari di Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - G Procopio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - S Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - F Atzori
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - A Passarelli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - M Bersanelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - M Stellato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - G Fornarini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - L Galli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - C Ortega
- Oncology Unit-ASL Cuneo 2-'Michele e Pietro Ferrero' Hospital, Verduno, Cuneo, Italy
| | - E Zanardi
- Academic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - L Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Facchini
- ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Oncology Operative Unit, 'S. Maria delle Grazie' Hospital-Pozzuoli, Napoli, Italy
| | - J R Giron Berrios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Belcolle Hospital of Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - R Ricotta
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy
| | - M Santoni
- Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - C Funaioli
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST 'Santi Paolo e Carlo', Milano, Italy
| | - P Trerotoli
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - C Porta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy; Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari 'Aldo Moro', Bari, Italy
| | - M Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy; Division of Translational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sari SY, Kahvecioglu A, Hurmuz P. In regard to wandrey et al. Lung Cancer 2023; 179:107179. [PMID: 36989614 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sezin Yuce Sari
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Turkey.
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Turkey.
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Xu Z, Mullen R, Alzate J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Liscak R, May J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Coupé FL, Mathieu D, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Palmer JD, Perlow HK, Peker S, Samanci Y, Peterson J, Trifiletti DM, Shepard MJ, Elhamdani S, Wegner RE, Speckter H, Hernandez W, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intraventricular Metastases: A Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:565-573. [PMID: 36512817 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable. OBJECTIVE To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed. RESULTS The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Reed Mullen
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan Alzate
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir May
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - François-Louis Coupé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Shahed Elhamdani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernandez
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Onal C, Oymak E, Guler OC, Tilki B, Yavas G, Hurmuz P, Yavas C, Ozyigit G. Stereotactic body radiotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 199:456-464. [PMID: 36450836 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02026-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies have determined the viability of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We examined the results of RCC patients who had five or fewer lesions and were treated with TKI and SBRT. METHODS The clinical data of 42 patients with 96 metastases treated between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. The prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS Median follow-up and time between TKI therapy and SBRT were 62.3 and 3.7 months, respectively. The 2‑year OS and PFS rates were 58.0% and 51.3%, respectively, and 2‑year local control rate was 94.1% per SBRT-treated lesion. In univariable analysis, the time between TKI therapy and SBRT and treatment response were significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariable analysis, a time between TKI therapy and SBRT of less than 3 months and complete response were significant predictors of better OS and PFS. Only 12 patients (28.6%) had a systemic treatment change at a median of 18.2 months after SBRT, mostly in patients with a non-complete treatment response after this therapy. Two patients (4.8%) experienced grade III toxicity, and all side effects observed during metastasis-directed therapy subsided over time. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that SBRT in combination with TKIs is an effective and safe treatment option for RCC patients with ≤ 5 metastases. However, distant metastasis was observed in 60% of the patients, indicating that distant disease control still has room for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Onal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 01120, Adana, Turkey.
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Ezgi Oymak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
| | - Ozan Cem Guler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 01120, Adana, Turkey
| | - Burak Tilki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Guler Yavas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cagdas Yavas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hasanov E, Yeboa DN, Tucker MD, Swanson TA, Beckham TH, Rini B, Ene CI, Hasanov M, Derks S, Smits M, Dudani S, Heng DYC, Brastianos PK, Bex A, Hanalioglu S, Weinberg JS, Hirsch L, Carlo MI, Aizer A, Brown PD, Bilen MA, Chang EL, Jaboin J, Brugarolas J, Choueiri TK, Atkins MB, McGregor BA, Halasz LM, Patel TR, Soltys SG, McDermott DF, Elder JB, Baskaya MK, Yu JB, Timmerman R, Kim MM, Mut M, Markert J, Beal K, Tannir NM, Samandouras G, Lang FF, Giles R, Jonasch E. An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:454-489. [PMID: 35708940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elshad Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mathew D Tucker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Hendrix Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Rini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merve Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophie Derks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Axel Bex
- The Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sahin Hanalioglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul David Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Lin Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles
| | - Jerry Jaboin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Toral R Patel
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - David F McDermott
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James Bradley Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mustafa K Baskaya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michelle Miran Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Melike Mut
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - James Markert
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George Samandouras
- Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel Giles
- International Kidney Cancer Coalition, Duivendrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jost T, Schuster B, Heinzerling L, Weissmann T, Fietkau R, Distel LV, Hecht M. Kinase inhibitors increase individual radiation sensitivity in normal cells of cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:838-848. [PMID: 35471558 PMCID: PMC9402507 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01945-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Kinase inhibitors (KI) are known to increase radiosensitivity, which can lead to increased risk of side effects. Data about interactions of commonly used KI with ionizing radiation on healthy tissue are rare. Patients and methods Freshly drawn blood samples were analyzed using three-color FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) to measure individual radiosensitivity via chromosomal aberrations after irradiation (2 Gy). Thresholds of 0.5 and 0.6 breaks/metaphase (B/M) indicate moderate or clearly increased radiosensitivity. Results The cohorts consisted of healthy individuals (NEG, n = 219), radiosensitive patients (POS, n = 24), cancer patients (n = 452) and cancer patients during KI therapy (n = 49). In healthy individuals radiosensitivity (≥ 0.6 B/M) was clearly increased in 5% of all cases, while in the radiosensitive cohort 79% were elevated. KI therapy increased the rate of sensitive patients (≥ 0.6 B/M) to 35% significantly compared to 19% in cancer patients without KI (p = 0.014). Increased radiosensitivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) among patients occurred in six of seven KI subgroups. The mean B/M values significantly increased during KI therapy (0.47 ± 0.20 B/M without compared to 0.50 ± 0.19 B/M with KI, p = 0.047). Conclusions Kinase inhibitors can intensify individual radiosensitivity of PBMCs distinctly in 85% of tested drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Jost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. .,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Barbara Schuster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lucie Heinzerling
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital München, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Weissmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Luitpold V Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Hecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rubino S, Oliver DE, Tran ND, Vogelbaum MA, Forsyth PA, Yu HHM, Ahmed K, Etame AB. Improving Brain Metastases Outcomes Through Therapeutic Synergy Between Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Targeted Cancer Therapies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:854402. [PMID: 35311078 PMCID: PMC8924127 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most common form of brain cancer. Increasing knowledge of primary tumor biology, actionable molecular targets and continued improvements in systemic and radiotherapy regimens have helped improve survival but necessitate multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgical, medical and radiation oncologists. In this review, we will discuss the advances of targeted therapies to date and discuss findings of studies investigating the synergy between these therapies and stereotactic radiosurgery for non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Rubino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Daniel E Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Nam D Tran
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | | | - Kamran Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sudhesh Dev S, Zainal Abidin SA, Farghadani R, Othman I, Naidu R. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Their Signaling Pathways as Therapeutic Targets of Curcumin in Cancer. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:772510. [PMID: 34867402 PMCID: PMC8634471 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.772510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are transmembrane cell-surface proteins that act as signal transducers. They regulate essential cellular processes like proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and metabolism. RTK alteration occurs in a broad spectrum of cancers, emphasising its crucial role in cancer progression and as a suitable therapeutic target. The use of small molecule RTK inhibitors however, has been crippled by the emergence of resistance, highlighting the need for a pleiotropic anti-cancer agent that can replace or be used in combination with existing pharmacological agents to enhance treatment efficacy. Curcumin is an attractive therapeutic agent mainly due to its potent anti-cancer effects, extensive range of targets and minimal toxicity. Out of the numerous documented targets of curcumin, RTKs appear to be one of the main nodes of curcumin-mediated inhibition. Many studies have found that curcumin influences RTK activation and their downstream signaling pathways resulting in increased apoptosis, decreased proliferation and decreased migration in cancer both in vitro and in vivo. This review focused on how curcumin exhibits anti-cancer effects through inhibition of RTKs and downstream signaling pathways like the MAPK, PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT, and NF-κB pathways. Combination studies of curcumin and RTK inhibitors were also analysed with emphasis on their common molecular targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sareshma Sudhesh Dev
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Syafiq Asnawi Zainal Abidin
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Reyhaneh Farghadani
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Iekhsan Othman
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Rakesh Naidu
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khan M, Zhao Z, Li X, Liao G. Anti-PD1 Therapy Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy May Prolong PFS in Selected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study. Int J Gen Med 2021; 14:8903-8918. [PMID: 34858054 PMCID: PMC8631977 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s333890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains an essential modality of treatment for brain metastases (BMs) derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and anti-PD-1 therapy has demonstrated intracranial responses in these patients. We aimed to evaluate if the combination of the two treatments could yield additive efficacy. Methods A retrospective review of our institution’s database was carried out to identify NSCLC patients with BMs who had been treated with anti-PD1 therapy and/or WBRT between 2015 and 2020. Patient characteristics, main outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and factors affecting these outcomes were analyzed. SPSS 24 was used for statistical analysis. Appropriate statistical tests were employed according to the type of data. Results Overall, 21 NSCLC BM patients were identified that had received WBRT. Of these, ten had been additionally treated with anti-PD1 therapy within 30 days of WBRT initiation. Median PFS was 3 (95% CI 0.8–5.1) months with WBRT alone versus 11 (95% CI 6.3–15.6) months with combined treatment. Risk of disease progression was 71% lower with the combined approach (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11–0.80; p=0.016). A trend toward improved OS was also observed with the combined approach (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.08–1.12; p=0.107). Concurrent treatment (p=0.028) and male sex (p=0.052) were associated with improved PFS, while OS was associated only with age (p=0.02). Conclusion Concurrent WBRT and anti-PD1 therapy may delay progression and improve survival in BM patients with confirmed EGFR- and ALK-negative NSCLC histology. Prospective studies are warranted to validate and elucidate on the additive effect of the two modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Khan
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihong Zhao
- Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medicine Centre, Jinan University, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Xianming Li
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Guixiang Liao
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Emamekhoo H, Olsen MR, Carthon BC, Drakaki A, Percent IJ, Molina AM, Cho DC, Bendell JC, Gordan LN, Rezazadeh Kalebasty A, George DJ, Hutson TE, Arrowsmith ER, Zhang J, Zoco J, Johansen JL, Leung DK, Tykodi SS. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920. Cancer 2021; 128:966-974. [PMID: 34784056 PMCID: PMC9298991 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) has demonstrated long‐term efficacy and safety in patients with previously untreated, advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Although most phase 3 clinical trials exclude patients with brain metastases, the ongoing, multicohort phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial (ClincalTrials.gov identifier NCT02982954) evaluated the safety and efficacy of NIVO + IPI in a cohort that included patients with aRCC and brain metastases, as reported here. Methods Patients with previously untreated aRCC and asymptomatic brain metastases received NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks × 4 followed by NIVO 480 mg every 4 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≥3 immune‐mediated adverse events (imAEs) within 100 days of the last dose of study drug. Key secondary end points were progression‐free survival and the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (both determined by the investigator). Exploratory end points included overall survival, among others. Results After a minimum follow‐up of 24.5 months (N = 28), no grade 5 imAEs occurred. The most common grade 3 and 4 imAEs were diarrhea/colitis (n = 2; 7%) and hypophysitis, rash, hepatitis, and diabetes mellitus (n = 1 each; 4%). The objective response rate was 32% (95% CI, 14.9%‐53.5%) with a median duration of response of 24.0 months; 4 of 8 responders remained without reported progression. Seven patients (25%) had intracranial progression. The median progression‐free survival was 9.0 months (95% CI, 2.9‐12.0 months), and the median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 14.1 months to not estimable). Conclusions In patients who had previously untreated aRCC and brain metastases—a population with a high unmet medical need that often is underrepresented in clinical trials—the approved regimen of NIVO + IPI followed by NIVO showed encouraging antitumor activity and no new safety signals. CheckMate 920 is the first prospective, multicohort study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first‐line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma in patients who have a poor prognosis and a high unmet medical need. In cohort 3 (advanced renal cell carcinoma and brain metastases), nivolumab plus ipilimumab has a safety profile consistent with previous reports of this dosing regimen with encouraging antitumor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Emamekhoo
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mark R Olsen
- Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| | - Bradley C Carthon
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Institute of Urologic Oncology, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Daniel C Cho
- Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Johanna C Bendell
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Lucio N Gordan
- Florida Cancer Specialists North/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott S Tykodi
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang S, Jin W, Jiang C, Zhang Y, Deng K. Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone or in combination with radiation therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A protocol for evidence-based systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27004. [PMID: 34414990 PMCID: PMC8376327 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the lack of evidence for survival benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma from the addition of radiation therapy to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, this Bayesian network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate survival outcomes in patients receiving radiation therapy plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. METHODS The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting guidelines were followed to conduct this study. The electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from the inception to August 2021. All phase III clinical trials that reported the outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor with radiation therapy compared with those of tyrosine kinase inhibitor or radiation therapy alone for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were considered eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, and adverse events as secondary outcome of interest were recorded for meta-analysis. RESULTS A Bayesian network meta-analysis is an appropriate statistical method to compare all treatment options by statistically simulating the estimated results of a comprehensive trial, and to compare treatments by common and associated comparators. In addition, Bayesian network meta-analysis can produce ranking probabilities of treatments, which may contribute to clinicians' clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
16
|
Validation of the updated renal graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for patients with renal cancer brain metastases treated with gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:527-536. [PMID: 34170460 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03793-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prognosis of patients with brain metastasis (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is relevant for treatment decisions and can be estimated with the Renal Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). The aim of this study is to validate the updated version of this instrument in a cohort treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) without prior local intracerebral therapy. METHODS Between 2007 and 2018, 106 RCC patients with BM were treated with GKRS. They were categorized according to the updated Renal GPA. Overall survival (OS), distant intracranial failure and local failure were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors were identified with Cox proportional hazard regressions. RESULTS Median OS was 8.6 months. Median OS for GPA categories 0.0-1.0 (15%), 1.5-2.0 (12%), 2.5-3.0 (35%) and 3.5-4.0 (29%) was 2.9, 5.5, 8.1 and 20.4 months, respectively. Karnofsky performance status < 90, serum hemoglobin ≤ 12.5 g/dL, age > 65 years and time from primary diagnosis to brain metastasis < 1 year were significantly related with shorter survival, while presence of extracranial disease, the volume and total number of BM had no significant impact on OS. A total count of > 4 BM was the only predictive factor for distant intracranial failure, while none of the investigated factors predicted local failure. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the updated Renal GPA in an independent cohort as a valuable instrument to estimate survival in patients with BM from RCC treated with GKRS.
Collapse
|
17
|
Synchronous brain metastases as a poor prognosis factor in clear cell renal carcinoma: a strong argument for systematic brain screening. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:133-141. [PMID: 33837880 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03751-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases (BM) usually represent a poor prognostic factor in solid tumors. About 10% of patients with renal cancer (RCC) will present BM. Local therapies such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and surgery are used to achieve brain control. We compared survival between patients with synchronous BM (SynBM group) and metachronous BM (MetaBM group). METHODS It is a retrospective study of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and BM treated with TKI between 2005 and 2019 at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon. We collected prognostic factors: The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, the TNM stage, the histological subtypes and the Fuhrman grade. Overall survival (OS) was defined from diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC to death. Brain progression-free survival (B-PFS) was defined from focal brain therapy to brain progression or death. RESULTS 99 patients were analyzed, 44 in the SynBM group and 55 in the MetaBM group. OS in the MetaBM group was 49.4 months versus 19.6 months in the SynBM group, p = 0.0002. The median time from diagnosis of metastasic disease to apparition of BM in the MetaBM group was 22.9 months (4.3; 125.7). SRT was used for 101 lesions (66.4%), WBRT for 25 patients (16.4%), surgery for 21 lesions (13.8%), surgery followed by radiation for 5 lesions (3.3%). B-PFS for all patients was 7 months (IC95% [5.0-10.5]). CONCLUSIONS Survival of patients with synchronous BM is inferior to that of patients with metachronous BM. Outcome is poor in both cases after diagnosis of BM. Brain screening should be encouraged at time of diagnosis of metastatis in ccRCC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Liao G, Khan M, Zhao Z, Arooj S, Yan M, Li X. Bevacizumab Treatment of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:593449. [PMID: 33842309 PMCID: PMC8027305 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.593449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation brain necrosis (RBN) is a serious complication in patients receiving radiotherapy for intracranial disease. Many studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with RBN. In the present study, we systematically reviewed the medical literature for studies reporting the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab, as well as for studies comparing bevacizumab with corticosteroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception through 1 March, 2020 for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in patients with RBN. Two investigators independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis. RESULTS Overall, the present systematic review included 12 studies (eight retrospective, two prospective, and two randomized control trials [RCTs]) involving 236 patients with RBN treated who were treated with bevacizumab. The two RCTs also had control arms comprising patients with RBN who were treated with corticosteroids/placebo (n=57). Radiographic responses were recorded in 84.7% (200/236) of patients, and radiographic progression was observed in 15.3% (36/236). Clinical improvement was observed in 91% (n=127) of responding patients among seven studies (n=113). All 12 studies reported volume reduction on T1 gadolinium enhancement MRI (median: 50%, range: 26%-80%) and/or T2 FLAIR MRI images (median: 59%, range: 48%-74%). In total, 46 responding patients (34%) had recurrence. The two RCTs revealed significantly improved radiographic response in patients treated with bevacizumab (Levin et al.: p = 0.0013; Xu et al.: p < 0.001). Both also showed clinical improvement (Levin et al.: NA; Xu et al.: p = 0.039) and significant reduction in edema volume on both T1 gadolinium enhancement MRI (Levin et al.: p=0.0058; Xu et al.: p=0.027) and T2 FLAIR MRI (Levin et al.: p=0.0149; Xu et al.: p < 0.001). Neurocognitive improvement was significantly better after 2 months of treatment in patients receiving bevacizumab than in those given corticosteroids, as assessed by the MoCA scale (p = 0.028). The recurrence rate and side effects of the treatments showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Patients with RBN respond to bevacizumab, which can improve clinical outcomes and cognitive function. Bevacizumab appears to be more efficacious than corticosteroid-based treatment. The safety profile was comparable to that of the corticosteroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guixiang Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Muhammad Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Zhihong Zhao
- Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Second Clinical Medicine Centre, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sumbal Arooj
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan
| | - Maosheng Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xianming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khan M, Zhao Z, Arooj S, Liao G. Bevacizumab for radiation necrosis following radiotherapy of brain metastatic disease: a systematic review & meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:167. [PMID: 33593308 PMCID: PMC7885379 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07889-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy is the mainstay of brain metastasis (BM) management. Radiation necrosis (RN) is a serious complication of radiotherapy. Bevacizumab (BV), an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, has been increasingly used for RN treatment. We systematically reviewed the medical literature for studies reporting the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for treatment of RN in BM patients. Materials and methods PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched with various search keywords such as “bevacizumab” OR “anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody” AND “radiation necrosis” OR “radiation-induced brain necrosis” OR “RN” OR “RBN” AND “Brain metastases” OR “BM” until 1st Aug 2020. Studies reporting the efficacy and safety of BV treatment for BM patients with RN were retrieved. Study selection and data extraction were carried out by independent investigators. Open Meta Analyst software was used as a random effects model for meta-analysis to obtain mean reduction rates. Results Two prospective, seven retrospective, and three case report studies involving 89 patients with RN treated with BV were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. In total, 83 (93%) patients had a recorded radiographic response to BV therapy, and six (6.7%) had experienced progressive disease. Seven studies (n = 73) reported mean volume reductions on gadolinium-enhanced T1 (mean: 47.03%, +/− 24.4) and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI images (mean: 61.9%, +/− 23.3). Pooling together the T1 and T2 MRI reduction rates by random effects model revealed a mean of 48.58 (95% CI: 38.32–58.85) for T1 reduction rate and 62.017 (95% CI: 52.235–71.799) for T2W imaging studies. Eighty-five patients presented with neurological symptoms. After BV treatment, nine (10%) had stable symptoms, 39 (48%) had improved, and 34 (40%) patients had complete resolution of their symptoms. Individual patient data was available for 54 patients. Dexamethasone discontinuation or reduction in dosage was observed in 30 (97%) of 31 patients who had recorded dosage before and after BV treatment. Side effects were mild. Conclusions Bevacizumab presents a promising treatment strategy for patients with RN and brain metastatic disease. Radiographic response and clinical improvement was observed without any serious adverse events. Further class I evidence would be required to establish a bevacizumab recommendation in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Khan
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518020, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihong Zhao
- Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medicine Centre, Jinan University, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Sumbal Arooj
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518020, People's Republic of China.,Department of Biochemistry, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan
| | - Guixiang Liao
- Department of Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518020, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|