1
|
Nisanova A, Parajuli A, Antony B, Aboud O, Sun J, Daly ME, Fragoso RC, Yiu G, Liu YA. Retinal Microstructural Changes Reflecting Treatment-Associated Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE 2024; 4:100577. [PMID: 39263578 PMCID: PMC11388696 DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether microstructural retinal changes, tumor features, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 polymorphism are correlated with clinically detectable treatment-associated cognitive dysfunction (TACD) in patients with lower-grade gliomas. Design Cohort study. Participants and Controls Sixteen patients with lower-grade glioma at a United States academic ophthalmology department between January 2021 and November 2023. Normal controls were recruited from convenient sampling. Methods Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores and retinal changes were assessed in 6-month intervals. Apolipoprotein E genotyping was performed, and tumor details were recorded. Partial least-squares discriminant (PLSD) model was established to evaluate the association between TACD with APOE genotype, ophthalmic, and tumor features. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measure was cognitive status as measured by the MoCA score and analyzed in relation to ophthalmic measurements, tumor features, and APOE genotype. Results Median time to first eye examination was 34 months (2-266) from tumor diagnosis and 23 months (0-246) from radiation. Nine patients (56%) had abnormal cognition (MoCA <26/30). Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were significantly worse in patients with temporal (22 ± 7.2) than frontal lobe tumors (26 ± 3.1, P = 0.02) and those with oligodendrogliomas (22 ± 4.1) than astrocytomas (26 ± 3.6, = 0.02). Patients with TACD had significant radial peripapillary capillary density loss (45% ± 4.6) compared with those with normal cognition (49% ± 2.6, P = 0.02). A PLSD model correlated MoCA scores with retinal nerve fiber thickness, intraocular pressure, foveal avascular zone, best-corrected visual acuity, months since first diagnosis, and tumor pathology (oligodendroglioma or not). Using these features, the model identified patients with TACD with 77% accuracy. Apolipoprotein E genotyping showed: 2 ε2/ε3 (13%), 10 ε3/ε3 (63%), and 1 ε3/ε4 (6%). Conclusions Retinal microstructural changes may serve as biomarkers for TACD in patients with lower-grade gliomas. Temporal lobe tumors and oligodendrogliomas may increase susceptibility to TACD. Utilization of retinal markers may enhance TACD diagnosis, progression monitoring, and inform management of lower-grade patients with glioma. A larger study with serial eye examinations is warranted to evaluate the role of APOE ε4 and develop a predictive model. Financial Disclosures Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arina Nisanova
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Ashutosh Parajuli
- Institute of Innovation, Science & Sustainability, Federation University Australia, Ballart, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bhavna Antony
- Institute of Innovation, Science & Sustainability, Federation University Australia, Ballart, Victoria, Australia
| | - Orwa Aboud
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Department of Neurology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Jinger Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Megan E Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Ruben C Fragoso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Glenn Yiu
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Yin Allison Liu
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
- Department of Neurology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pembroke L, Sherman KA, Dhillon HM, Francis H, Gurney H, Gillatt D. What is the nature and impact of cognitive difficulties following hormonal treatments for prostate cancer?: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:534. [PMID: 39037597 PMCID: PMC11263254 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08749-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prostate cancer hormonal treatments (e.g. androgen deprivation therapy) yield clinical benefits. However, there is increasing evidence these treatments may adversely impact cognitive functioning. This study aimed to qualitatively characterise the nature and impact of cognitive difficulties following these treatments. METHODS Prostate cancer survivors (PCS) self-reporting cognitive difficulties following hormonal treatments (via an online survey) and their partners were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Telephone or videoconferencing interviews were conducted, then transcribed, double-coded and analysed using the Framework Method, following the principles of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. RESULTS Eleven participants (six PCS and five partners) were interviewed. PCS reported a range of cognitive difficulties, verified by their partners, including forgetfulness, "fogginess", fatigue and slowed processing speed. For some PCS, word-finding difficulties, tangential speech and memory problems were apparent during interviews. The aetiology of the reported cognitive difficulties was unclear as it was attributed to a possible combination of cancer treatments, compounding side-effects (e.g. fatigue, sleep problems, hot flashes), exacerbation of pre-existing conditions and/or age-related changes. Cognitive difficulties were reported to have led to shifts in self-perception, interpersonal dynamics and increased emotionality. Engagement in cognitively-stimulating activities and reliance on compensatory strategies were reported to be helpful in managing some cognitive difficulties. All participants endorsed the potential benefits of neuropsychological intervention. CONCLUSIONS There are a diverse range of cognitive difficulties following hormonal treatments for prostate cancer experienced by PCS and their partners. Understanding the impact of these difficulties is important for the development of targeted neuropsychological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Pembroke
- Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University & Macquarie University Hospital, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kerry A Sherman
- Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University & Macquarie University Hospital, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Heather Francis
- School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University & Macquarie University Hospital, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Howard Gurney
- Macquarie University Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University & Macquarie University Hospital, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David Gillatt
- Macquarie University Urology Clinic, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University & Macquarie University Hospital, 2109, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Melis M, Schroyen G, Blommaert J, Leenaerts N, Smeets A, Van Der Gucht K, Sunaert S, Deprez S. The Impact of Mindfulness on Functional Brain Connectivity and Peripheral Inflammation in Breast Cancer Survivors with Cognitive Complaints. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3632. [PMID: 37509292 PMCID: PMC10377401 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) has been linked to functional brain changes and inflammatory processes. Hence, interventions targeting these underlying mechanisms are needed. In this study, we investigated the effects of a mindfulness-based intervention on brain function and inflammatory profiles in breast cancer survivors with CRCI. METHODS Female breast cancer survivors reporting cognitive complaints (n = 117) were randomly assigned to a mindfulness-based intervention (n = 43), physical training (n = 36), or waitlist control condition (n = 38). Region-of-interest (ROI) and graph theory analyses of resting state functional MRI data were performed to study longitudinal group differences in functional connectivity and organization in the default mode, dorsal attention, salience, and frontoparietal network. Additionally, bead-based immunoassays were used to investigate the differences in inflammatory profiles on serum samples. Measures were collected before, immediately after and three months post-intervention. RESULTS No ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity changes were identified. Compared to no intervention, graph analysis showed a larger decrease in clustering coefficient after mindfulness and physical training. Additionally, a larger increase in global efficiency after physical training was identified. Furthermore, the physical training group showed a larger decrease in an inflammatory profile compared to no intervention (IL-12p70, IFN-γ, IL-1β, and IL-8). CONCLUSION Both mindfulness and physical training induced changes in the functional organization of networks related to attention, emotion processing, and executive functioning. While both interventions reduced functional segregation, only physical training increased functional integration of the neural network. In conclusion, physical training had the most pronounced effects on functional network organization and biomarkers of inflammation, two mechanisms that might be involved in CRCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Melis
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, Catholic University Leuven, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gwen Schroyen
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, Catholic University Leuven, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Blommaert
- Leuven Brain Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Leenaerts
- Leuven Brain Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Neurosciences, Mind-Body Research, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katleen Van Der Gucht
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Leuven Mindfulness Centre, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Neuromodulation Laboratory, Biomedical Sciences Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefan Sunaert
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, Catholic University Leuven, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabine Deprez
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, Catholic University Leuven, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murillo LC, Sutachan JJ, Albarracín SL. An update on neurobiological mechanisms involved in the development of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI). Toxicol Rep 2023; 10:544-553. [PMID: 37396847 PMCID: PMC10313882 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide despite efforts in early diagnosis of the disease and advances in treatment. The use of drugs that exert toxic effects on tumor cells or chemotherapy is one of the most widely used treatments against cancer. However, its low toxic selectivity affects both healthy cells and cancer cells. It has been reported that chemotherapeutic drugs may generate neurotoxicity that induces deleterious effects of chemotherapy in the central nervous system. In this sense, patients report decreased cognitive abilities, such as memory, learning, and some executive functions after chemotherapy. This chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) develops during treatment and persists even after chemotherapy. Here we present a review of the literature on the main neurobiological mechanisms involved in CICI using a Boolean formula following the steps of the PRISMA guidelines that were used to perform statements searches in various databases. The main mechanisms described in the literature to explain CRCI include direct and indirect mechanisms that induce neurotoxicity by chemotherapeutic agents. Therefore, this review provides a general understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms of CICI and the possible therapeutic targets to prevent it..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sonia Luz Albarracín
- Correspondence to: Carrera 7 No. 43–82, Edificio Jesús Emilio Ramírez, Lab 304A, Bogotá C.P.110211, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fleming B, Edison P, Kenny L. Cognitive impairment after cancer treatment: mechanisms, clinical characterization, and management. BMJ 2023; 380:e071726. [PMID: 36921926 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a debilitating side effect experienced by patients with cancer treated with systemically administered anticancer therapies. With around 19.3 million new cases of cancer worldwide in 2020 and the five year survival rate growing from 50% in 1970 to 67% in 2013, an urgent need exists to understand enduring side effects with severe implications for quality of life. Whereas cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy is recognized in patients with breast cancer, researchers have started to identify cognitive impairment associated with other treatments such as immune, endocrine, and targeted therapies only recently. The underlying mechanisms are diverse and therapy specific, so further evaluation is needed to develop effective therapeutic interventions. Drug and non-drug management strategies are emerging that target mechanistic pathways or the cognitive deficits themselves, but they need to be rigorously evaluated. Clinically, consistent use of objective diagnostic tools is necessary for accurate diagnosis and clinical characterization of cognitive impairment in patients treated with anticancer therapies. This should be supplemented with clinical guidelines that could be implemented in daily practice. This review summarizes the recent advances in the mechanisms, clinical characterization, and novel management strategies of cognitive impairment associated with treatment of non-central nervous system cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Fleming
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Edison
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Laura Kenny
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A Systematic Review on the Potential Acceleration of Neurocognitive Aging in Older Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041215. [PMID: 36831557 PMCID: PMC9954467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
As survival rates increase, more emphasis has gone to possible cognitive sequelae in older cancer patients, which could be explained by accelerated brain aging. In this review, we provide a complete overview of studies investigating neuroimaging, neurocognitive, and neurodegenerative disorders in older cancer survivors (>65 years), based on three databases (Pubmed, Web of Science and Medline). Ninety-six studies were included. Evidence was found for functional and structural brain changes (frontal regions, basal ganglia, gray and white matter), compared to healthy controls. Cognitive decline was mainly found in memory functioning. Anti-hormonal treatments were repeatedly associated with cognitive decline (tamoxifen) and sometimes with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (androgen deprivation therapy). Chemotherapy was inconsistently associated with later development of cognitive changes or dementia. Radiotherapy was not associated with cognition in patients with non-central nervous system cancer but can play a role in patients with central nervous system cancer, while neurosurgery seemed to improve their cognition in the short-term. Individual risk factors included cancer subtypes (e.g., brain cancer, hormone-related cancers), treatment (e.g., anti-hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, cranial radiation), genetic predisposition (e.g., APOE, COMT, BDNF), age, comorbidities (e.g., frailty, cognitive reserve), and psychological (e.g., depression, (post-traumatic) distress, sleep, fatigue) and social factors (e.g., loneliness, limited caregiver support, low SES). More research on accelerated aging is required to guide intervention studies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Braun G, Escher BI. Prioritization of mixtures of neurotoxic chemicals for biomonitoring using high-throughput toxicokinetics and mixture toxicity modeling. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 171:107680. [PMID: 36502700 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Modern society continues to pollute the environment with larger quantities of chemicals that have also become more structurally and functionally diverse. Risk assessment of chemicals can hardly keep up with the sheer numbers that lead to complex mixtures of increasing chemical diversity including new chemicals, substitution products on top of still abundant legacy compounds. Fortunately, over the last years computational tools have helped us to identify and prioritize chemicals of concern. These include toxicokinetic models to predict exposure to chemicals as well as new approach methodologies such as in-vitro bioassays to address toxicodynamic effects. Combined, they allow for a prediction of mixtures and their respective effects and help overcome the lack of data we face for many chemicals. In this study we propose a high-throughput approach using experimental and predicted exposure, toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to simulate mixtures, to which a virtual population is exposed to and predict their mixture effects. The general workflow is adaptable for any type of toxicity, but we demonstrated its applicability with a case study on neurotoxicity. If no experimental data for neurotoxicity were available, we used baseline toxicity predictions as a surrogate. Baseline toxicity is the minimal toxicity any chemical has and might underestimate the true contribution to the mixture effect but many neurotoxicants are not by orders of magnitude more potent than baseline toxicity. Therefore, including baseline-toxic effects in mixture simulations yields a more realistic picture than excluding them in mixture simulations. This workflow did not only correctly identify and prioritize known chemicals of concern like benzothiazoles, organochlorine pesticides and plasticizers but we were also able to identify new potential neurotoxicants that we recommend to include in future biomonitoring studies and if found in humans, to also include in neurotoxicity screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Braun
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Beate I Escher
- Department of Cell Toxicology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany; Environmental Toxicology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lange M, Clarisse B, Leconte A, Dembélé KP, Lequesne J, Nicola C, Dubois M, Derues L, Gidron Y, Castel H, Joly F. Cognitive assessment in patients treated by immunotherapy: the prospective Cog-Immuno trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1308. [PMID: 36513991 PMCID: PMC9749352 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10384-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The discovery of the importance of the immune system and its role in oncogenesis led to the development of immunotherapy, a treatment that represents a major advance in oncology management. Due to the recent nature of immunotherapy, little is known about its side effects and their impact on quality of life. To date, there is no published study that accurately assesses the impact of immunotherapy on cognition, mood and/or fatigue in patients treated for cancer, despite potential neurological toxicities. The purpose of this study is to prospectively assess the incidence of cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints among cancer patients naïve for immunotherapy without concomitant anti-cancer treatment. METHODS The Cog-Immuno trial is a multicentre longitudinal study addressing patients with cancer candidate to receive immunotherapy alone (n = 100). Immunotherapy treatment will include either anti-PD1/PDL1 or anti-CTLA4 monotherapy or combination therapy. Cognitive and quality of life assessment, electrocardiogram (ECG) and biological tests will be performed at baseline, thereafter 3, and 6 months after immunotherapy initiation. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients treated by immunotherapy who will experience a decline in cognitive performances or in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score within 3 months after inclusion. Secondary endpoints concern: anxiety, depression, fatigue, clinical characteristics, biological data and neurophysiological measures (heart rate variability and hemispheric lateralization). A pre-clinical study will be conducted in cancer bearing mice receiving checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with the evaluation of cognitive functions and emotional reactivity, collection of blood samples and investigation of neurobiological mechanisms from brain slices. DISCUSSION Assessing and understanding the incidence and the severity of cognitive impairment and its impact on quality of life in cancer patients treated by immunotherapy is a major issue. The results of this study will provide information on the impact of these treatments on cognitive functions in order to help the physicians in the choice of the treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03599830, registered July 26, 2018. PROTOCOL VERSION Version 5.1 dated from 2020/10/02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lange
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, ANTICIPE, 14000 Caen, France ,Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Bénédicte Clarisse
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Alexandra Leconte
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Kléouforo-Paul Dembélé
- Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie University, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1245, Cancer and Brain Genomics, 76000 Rouen, France ,grid.503198.6Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Justine Lequesne
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, ANTICIPE, 14000 Caen, France ,Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Celeste Nicola
- Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie University, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1245, Cancer and Brain Genomics, 76000 Rouen, France ,grid.503198.6Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Martine Dubois
- Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie University, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1245, Cancer and Brain Genomics, 76000 Rouen, France ,grid.503198.6Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Laurence Derues
- Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie University, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1245, Cancer and Brain Genomics, 76000 Rouen, France ,grid.503198.6Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Yori Gidron
- grid.18098.380000 0004 1937 0562Dept. of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Hélène Castel
- Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie University, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1245, Cancer and Brain Genomics, 76000 Rouen, France ,grid.503198.6Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB), 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Florence Joly
- grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, ANTICIPE, 14000 Caen, France ,Cancer & Cognition Platform, Ligue Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France ,grid.418189.d0000 0001 2175 1768Medical oncology department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sleurs C, Amidi A, Wu LM, Kiesl D, Zimmer P, Lange M, Rogiers A, Giffard B, Binarelli G, Borghgraef C, Deprez S, Duivon M, De Ruiter M, Schagen S, Ahmed-Lecheheb D, Castel H, Buskbjerg CR, Dos Santos M, Joly F, Perrier J. Cancer-related cognitive impairment in non-CNS cancer patients: Targeted review and future action plans in Europe. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 180:103859. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
10
|
Schroyen G, Schramm G, Van Weehaeghe D, Leenaerts N, Vande Casteele T, Blommaert J, Koole M, Smeets A, Van Laere K, Sunaert S, Deprez S. Cerebral glucose changes after chemotherapy and their relation to long-term cognitive complaints and fatigue. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1021615. [PMID: 36313711 PMCID: PMC9612406 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the short-term cerebral metabolic effects of intravenous chemotherapy and their association with long-term fatigue/cognitive complaints. Experimental design Using [18F]-FDG-PET/CT whole-body scans, we retrospectively quantified relative cerebral glucose metabolism before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a cohort of patients treated for non-metastatic breast cancer (2009-2019). Self-report of cognitive complaints and fatigue were prospectively assessed 7 ± 3 years after therapy. Metabolic changes were estimated with i) robust mixed-effects modelling in regions-of-interest (frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and insular cortex) and ii) general-linear modelling of whole-brain voxel-wise outcomes. iii) The association between metabolic changes and self-reported outcomes was evaluated using linear regression-analysis. Results Of the 667 screened patients, 263 underwent PET/CT before and after chemotherapy and 183 (48 ± 9 years) met the inclusion criteria. After chemotherapy, decreased frontal and increased parietal and insular metabolism were observed (|ß|>0.273, pFDR<0.008). Separately, additional increased occipital metabolism after epiribucin+ cyclophosphamide (EC) and temporal metabolism after EC+ fluorouracil chemotherapy were observed (ß>0.244, pFDR≤0.048). Voxel-based analysis (pcluster-FWE<0.001) showed decreased metabolism in the paracingulate gyrus (-3.2 ± 3.9%) and putamen (3.1 ± 4.1%) and increased metabolism in the lateral cortex (L=2.9 ± 3.1%) and pericentral gyri (3.0 ± 4.4%). Except for the central sulcus, the same regions showed changes in EC, but not in FEC patients. Of the 97 self-reported responders, 23% and 27% experienced extreme fatigue and long-term cognitive complaints, respectively, which were not associated with metabolic changes. Conclusion Both hyper- and hypometabolism were observed after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Combined with earlier findings, this study could support inflammatory mechanisms resulting in relative hypermetabolism, mainly in the parietal/occipital cortices. As early metabolic changes did not precede long-term complaints, further research is necessary to identify vulnerable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen Schroyen
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Gwen Schroyen,
| | - Georg Schramm
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Donatienne Van Weehaeghe
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Leenaerts
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Neurosciences, Mind-Body Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- University Psychiatric Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Vande Casteele
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- University Psychiatric Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Neurosciences, Neuropsychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Blommaert
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michel Koole
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefan Sunaert
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabine Deprez
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational MRI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bradley-Garcia M, Winocur G, Sekeres MJ. Episodic Memory and Recollection Network Disruptions Following Chemotherapy Treatment in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Review of Neuroimaging Findings. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4752. [PMID: 36230678 PMCID: PMC9563268 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term memory disturbances are amongst the most common and disruptive cognitive symptoms experienced by breast cancer survivors following chemotherapy. To date, most clinical assessments of long-term memory dysfunction in breast cancer survivors have utilized basic verbal and visual memory tasks that do not capture the complexities of everyday event memories. Complex event memories, including episodic memory and autobiographical memory, critically rely on hippocampal processing for encoding and retrieval. Systemic chemotherapy treatments used in breast cancer commonly cause neurotoxicity within the hippocampus, thereby creating a vulnerability to memory impairment. We review structural and functional neuroimaging studies that have identified disruptions in the recollection network and related episodic memory impairments in chemotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors, and argue for the need to better characterize hippocampally mediated memory dysfunction following chemotherapy treatments. Given the importance of autobiographical memory for a person's sense of identity, ability to plan for the future, and general functioning, under-appreciation of how this type of memory is impacted by cancer treatment can lead to overlooking or minimizing the negative experiences of breast cancer survivors, and neglecting a cognitive domain that may benefit from intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gordon Winocur
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada
| | - Melanie J Sekeres
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oppegaard KR, Armstrong TS, Anguera JA, Kober KM, Debr LK, Laister RC, Saligan LN, Ayala AP, Kuruvilla J, Alm MW, Byker WH, Miaskowski C, Mayo SJ. Blood-Based Biomarkers of Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment in Non-Central Nervous System Cancer: A Scoping Review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 180:103822. [PMID: 36152911 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This scoping review was designed to synthesize the extant literature on associations between subjective and/or objective measures of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and blood-based biomarkers in adults with non-central nervous system cancers. The literature search was done for studies published from the start of each database searched (i.e., MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, grey literature) through to October 20, 2021. A total of 95 studies are included in this review. Of note, a wide variety of biomarkers were evaluated. Most studies evaluated patients with breast cancer. A variety of cognitive assessment measures were used. The most consistent significant findings were with various subjective and objective measures of CRCI and levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor. Overall, biomarker research is in an exploratory phase. However, this review synthesizes findings and proposes directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate R Oppegaard
- University of California San Francisco, School of Nursing, Department of Physiological Nursing, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA
| | - Joaquin A Anguera
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, USA
| | - Kord M Kober
- University of California San Francisco, School of Nursing, Department of Physiological Nursing, USA
| | - Lynch Kelly Debr
- University of Florida, College of Nursing, USA; University of Florida Health Cancer Center, USA
| | - Rob C Laister
- Princess Margaret Health Center, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Leorey N Saligan
- Symptoms Biology Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health, USA
| | | | - John Kuruvilla
- Princess Margaret Health Center, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Mark W Alm
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Canada
| | | | - Christine Miaskowski
- University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, USA
| | - Samantha J Mayo
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A Panax quinquefolius-Based Preparation Prevents the Impact of 5-FU on Activity/Exploration Behaviors and Not on Cognitive Functions Mitigating Gut Microbiota and Inflammation in Mice. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184403. [PMID: 36139563 PMCID: PMC9496716 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and fatigue worsen the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Multicenter studies have shown that Panax quinquefolius and vitamin C, respectively, were effective in reducing the symptoms of fatigue in treated cancer patients. We developed a behavioral C57Bl/6j mouse model to study the impact of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy on activity/fatigue, emotional reactivity and cognitive functions. We used this model to evaluate the potentially beneficial role of a Panax quinquefolius-based solution containing vitamin C (Qiseng®) or vitamin C alone in these chemotherapy side effects. We established that Qiseng® prevents the reduction in activity/exploration and symptoms of fatigue induced by 5-FU and dampens chemotherapy-induced intestinal dysbiosis and systemic inflammation. We further showed that Qiseng® decreases macrophage infiltration in the intestinal compartment, thus preventing, at least in part, the systemic elevation of IL-6 and MCP-1 and further reducing the neuroinflammation likely responsible for the fatigue induced by chemotherapy, a major advance toward improving the QoL of patients. Abstract Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) and fatigue constitute common complaints among cancer patient survivors. Panax quinquefolius has been shown to be effective against fatigue in treated cancer patients. We developed a behavioral C57Bl/6j mouse model to study the role of a Panax quinquefolius-based solution containing vitamin C (Qiseng®) or vitamin C alone in activity/fatigue, emotional reactivity and cognitive functions impacted by 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. 5-FU significantly reduces the locomotor/exploration activity potentially associated with fatigue, evokes spatial cognitive impairments and leads to a decreased neurogenesis within the hippocampus (Hp). Qiseng® fully prevents the impact of chemotherapy on activity/fatigue and on neurogenesis, specifically in the ventral Hp. We observed that the chemotherapy treatment induces intestinal damage and inflammation associated with increased levels of Lactobacilli in mouse gut microbiota and increased expression of plasma pro-inflammatory cytokines, notably IL-6 and MCP-1. We demonstrated that Qiseng® prevents the 5-FU-induced increase in Lactobacilli levels and further compensates the 5-FU-induced cytokine release. Concomitantly, in the brains of 5-FU-treated mice, Qiseng® partially attenuates the IL-6 receptor gp130 expression associated with a decreased proliferation of neural stem cells in the Hp. In conclusion, Qiseng® prevents the symptoms of fatigue, reduced chemotherapy-induced neuroinflammation and altered neurogenesis, while regulating the mouse gut microbiota composition, thus protecting against intestinal and systemic inflammation.
Collapse
|
14
|
Schroyen G, Sleurs C, Bartsoen E, Smeets D, van Weehaeghe D, Van Laere K, Smeets A, Deprez S, Sunaert S. Neuroinflammation as potential precursor of leukoencephalopathy in early-stage breast cancer patients: A cross-sectional PET-MRI study. Breast 2022; 62:61-68. [PMID: 35131644 PMCID: PMC8829129 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although chemotherapy-induced leukoencephalopathy has been described in case and cohort studies, literature remains inconclusive about its prevalence and mechanisms. Therefore, we investigated the presence of leukoencephalopathy after multiagent chemotherapy in women treated for breast cancer and potential underlying neuroinflammatory processes. Methods In this exploratory study, 15 chemotherapy-treated and 15 age-matched chemotherapy-naïve patients with early-stage breast cancer, as well as 15 healthy controls underwent simultaneous PET-MR neuroimaging, including T1-weighted MPRAGE, T2-weighted FLAIR and dynamic PET with the 18-kDA translocator protein (TSPO) radioligand [18F]DPA-714. Total and regional (juxtacortical, periventricular, deep white matter and infratentorial) lesion burden were compared between the groups with one-way ANOVA. With paired t-tests, [18F]DPA-714 volume of distribution [VT, including partial volume correction (PVC)] in lesioned and normal appearing white matter (NAWM) were compared within subjects, to investigate inflammation. Finally, two general linear models were used to examine the predictive values of neurofilament light-chain (NfL) serum levels on (1) total lesion burden or (2) PVC [18F]DPA-714 VT of lesions showing elevated inflammation. Results No significant differences were found in total or localized lesion burden. However, significantly higher (20–45%) TSPO uptake was observed in juxtacortical lesions (p ≤ 0.008, t ≥ 3.90) compared to NAWM in both cancer groups, but only persisted for chemotherapy-treated patients after PVC (p = 0.005, t = 4.30). NfL serum levels were not associated with total lesion volume or tracer uptake in juxtacortical lesions. Conclusion This multimodal neuroimaging study suggests that neuroinflammatory processes could be involved in the development of juxtacortical, but not periventricular or deep white matter, leukoencephalopathy shortly after chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. No increased white matter lesion load in breast cancer patients. No differences in TSPO uptake in periventricular or deep white matter lesions. Higher TSPO uptake in juxtacortical lesions in chemotherapy-treated breast cancer patients. TSPO uptake in inflammatory lesions and NfL levels not significantly associated, despite a trend.
Collapse
|
15
|
Recent development of aptamer conjugated chitosan nanoparticles as cancer therapeutics. Int J Pharm 2022; 620:121751. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
16
|
Janelsins MC, Lei L, Netherby-Winslow C, Kleckner AS, Kerns S, Gilmore N, Belcher E, Thompson BD, Werner ZA, Hopkins JO, Long J, Cole S, Culakova E. Relationships between cytokines and cognitive function from pre- to post-chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. J Neuroimmunol 2022; 362:577769. [PMID: 34871864 PMCID: PMC10659959 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) is a clinically important problem and negatively affects daily functioning and quality of life. We conducted a pilot longitudinal study from pre- to post-chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer to assess changes in inflammation and cognition over time, as well as the impact of baseline cytokine level on post-chemotherapy cognitive scores. We found that concentrations of IL-6, MCP-1, sTNFRI, and sTNFRII significantly increased in patients, while IL-1β significantly decreased (p < 0.05). After controlling for covariates, increases in IL-6 and MCP-1 were associated with worse executive function and verbal fluency in patients from pre- to post-chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Higher baseline IL-6 was associated with better performance on executive function and verbal fluency post chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Overall, these results suggest that chemotherapy-associated increases in cytokines/receptors is associated with worse cognitive function. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C Janelsins
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.
| | - Lianlian Lei
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Colleen Netherby-Winslow
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Amber S Kleckner
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Sarah Kerns
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14624, United States
| | - Nikesha Gilmore
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Elizabeth Belcher
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States; Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Bryan D Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Zachary A Werner
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium (SCOR), 2150 Country Club Road Suite 200, Winston Salem, NC 27104, United States
| | - Joan Long
- Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan NCORP (CRCWM), 25 Michigan St. NE, Suite 3100, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, United States
| | - Sharon Cole
- Dayton Clinical Oncology Program, 3123 Research Blvd., Suite 150, Dayton, OH 45420, United States
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester, 265 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saini R, Sharma N, Oladeji OS, Sourirajan A, Dev K, Zengin G, El-Shazly M, Kumar V. Traditional uses, bioactive composition, pharmacology, and toxicology of Phyllanthus emblica fruits: A comprehensive review. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2022; 282:114570. [PMID: 34480995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE The fruits of Phyllanthus emblica Linn or Emblica officinalis Gaertn (Phyllanthaceae), (FPE) commonly known as Indian gooseberry or Amla, gained immense importance in indigenous traditional medicinal systems, including Ayurveda, for its medicinal and nutritional benefits. It is used to cure several diseases such as common cold, fever, cough, asthma, bronchitis, diabetes, cephalalgia, ophthalmopathy, dyspepsia, colic, flatulence, hyperacidity, peptic ulcer, erysipelas, skin diseases, leprosy, hematogenesis, inflammation, anemia, emaciation, hepatopathy, jaundice, diarrhea, dysentery, hemorrhages, leucorrhea, menorrhagia, cardiac disorders, and premature greying of hair. AIM OF THE STUDY In the present review, we presented a comprehensive analysis of the ethnopharmacology, bioactive composition, and toxicity of P. emblica to identify the gap between research and the current applications and to help explore the trends and perspectives for future studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected the literature published before April 2021 on the phytochemistry, pharmacology, and toxicity of FPE. Literature in English from scientific databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Springer, and Google Scholar, books. These reports were analyzed and summarized to prepare this review. The plant taxonomy was verified by "The Plant List" database (http://www.theplantlist.org). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION s: FPE have been used as a rich source of vitamin C, minerals, and amino acids. Several bioactive molecules were isolated and identified from FPE such as tannins, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, alkaloids, ascorbic acid etc. The in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies on FPE revealed its antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, anticancer, radioprotective, hepatoprotective, immunomodulatory, hypolipidemic, anti-venom, wound healing, HIV-reverse transcriptase effect. Toxicological studies on fruits indicated the absence of any adverse effect even at a high dose after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS Although FPE showed remarkable therapeutic activities against several diseases such as diabetes, cancer, inflammation, hepatitis B virus, and malaria, there were several drawbacks in some previous reports including the lack of information on the drug dose, standards, controls, and mechanism of action of the extract. Further in-depth studies are required to explain the mechanism of action of the extracts to reveal the role of the bioactive compounds in the reported activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakshandha Saini
- Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Post Box No. 9, Head Post Office, Solan, H.P., India
| | - Nitin Sharma
- Department of Biotechnology, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran, Mohali, Punjab, India
| | - Oluwole Solomon Oladeji
- Department of Physical Sciences, Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, Landmark University, PMB 1001, Km 4, Ipetu Road, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria
| | - Anuradha Sourirajan
- Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Post Box No. 9, Head Post Office, Solan, H.P., India
| | - Kamal Dev
- Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Post Box No. 9, Head Post Office, Solan, H.P., India
| | - Gökhan Zengin
- Selcuk University, Science Faculty, Department of Biology, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mohamed El-Shazly
- Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt; Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, German University in Cairo, Cairo, 11835, Egypt.
| | - Vikas Kumar
- Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Post Box No. 9, Head Post Office, Solan, H.P., India.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schroyen G, Vissers J, Smeets A, Gillebert CR, Lemiere J, Sunaert S, Deprez S, Sleurs C. Blood and neuroimaging biomarkers of cognitive sequelae in breast cancer patients throughout chemotherapy: A systematic review. Transl Oncol 2021; 16:101297. [PMID: 34896851 PMCID: PMC8681023 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer treatment can induce alterations in blood- and neuroimaging-based markers. However, an overview of the predictive value of these markers for cognition is lacking for breast cancer survivors. This systematic review summarized studies of the last decade, using the PubMed database, evaluating blood markers, and the association between blood- or structural neuroimaging markers and cognition across the chemotherapy trajectory for primary breast cancer, following PRISMA guidelines. Forty-four studies were included. Differences were observed in all blood marker categories, from on-therapy until years post-chemotherapy. Associations were found between cognitive functioning and (1) blood markers (mainly inflammation-related) during, shortly-, or years post-chemotherapy and (2) white and gray matter metrics in frontal, temporal and parietal brain regions months up until years post-chemotherapy. Preliminary evidence exists for epigenetic and metabolic changes being associated with cognition, only after chemotherapy. This review demonstrated time-dependent associations between specific blood-based and structural neuroimaging markers with cognitive impairment in patients with breast cancer. Future studies are encouraged to include both neuroimaging- and blood markers (e.g. of neuronal integrity, epigenetics and metabolism) to predict long-term cognitive effects of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwen Schroyen
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Julie Vissers
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Céline R Gillebert
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Jurgen Lemiere
- Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Stefan Sunaert
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sabine Deprez
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Sleurs
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Argyriou AA, Karteri S, Bruna J, Mariotto S, Simo M, Velissaris D, Kalofonou F, Cavaletti G, Ferrari S, Kalofonos HP. Serum neurofilament light chain levels as biomarker of paclitaxel-induced cognitive impairment in patients with breast cancer: a prospective study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1807-1814. [PMID: 34599664 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06509-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To prospectively assess the utility of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels in identifying the risk to develop chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) in cancer patients. We also examined if sNfL can be identified as an early biomarker of CICI development. METHODS We longitudinally measured sNfL levels in 20 female patients with breast cancer, scheduled to receive the 12 weekly paclitaxel-based regimen. An equal number of age-matched female heathy subjects was incuded as control group. CICI was graded by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MOCA); peripheral neurotoxicity (PN) was graded using the neurosensory Common Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)v5.0, while sNfL levels were quantified using a high-sensitive technique (Quanterix, Simoa) before the administration of chemotherapy (T0), after 3 courses (T1), and at the end of chemotherapy (T2). RESULTS Pre-treatment sNfL levels were comparable in patients and controls (p = 0.103). At T2, 5/20 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 5.0 years) developed CICI. These 5 patients also had clinically-significant PN. Patients with and without CICI had comparable sNfL values at T2 (p = 0.1). In addition, at T2, sNfL levels did not correlate significantly with MOCA score in CICI patients (p = 0.604). The difference of sNfL levels between T1 and T0 failed to predict independently the occurrence of CICI at T2. CONCLUSION Our findings do not support the utility of measuring sNfL levels as a biomarker of CICI. Grade 2-3 PN most strongly confounded our outcomes. Considering the small sample size, which might have prevented the results from being extrapolated, further testing in larger studies is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas A Argyriou
- Neurology Department, Saint Andrew's General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Sofia Karteri
- Oncology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Jordi Bruna
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-ICO L'Hospitalet (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Mariotto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marta Simo
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-ICO L'Hospitalet (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Foteini Kalofonou
- Department of Oncology, Imperial NHS Healthcare Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Guido Cavaletti
- Experimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Sergio Ferrari
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Haralabos P Kalofonos
- Neurology Department, Saint Andrew's General Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University Hospital, University of Patras Medical School, 26504, Rion-Patras, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abebe E, Tollesa T, Assefa M, Tilahun Z, Dinku Y, Abebaw S, Mamuye M. Cognitive functioning and its associated factors among breast cancer patients on chemotherapy at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa Ethiopia: an institution-based comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1052. [PMID: 34563150 PMCID: PMC8466660 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08799-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer in the world. It is the commonest type of cancer in Ethiopia. Cognitive problems are common among breast cancer patients. The study aimed to assess cognitive functioning and its associated factors among breast cancer patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2020. METHODS Institution-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. Study subjects were 117 breast cancer patients on chemotherapy and 117 women without breast cancer who volunteered for the study. Data was collected from May-June 2020. The Mini-mental status exam (MMSE) was used to assess cognitive functioning. Data were entered into Epi Data version 4.6.0.2 and analyzed using STATA version 14 software. Univariable and multivariable linear regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with cognitive functioning. A two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance. RESULTS Among the total breast cancer patients 41.9% were diagnosed with earlier sage of the diseases (stage I and II), while the rest 58.1% were diagnosed with stage III and stage IV breast cancer. A significant difference in the MMSE score was observed among breast cancer patients and controls (19.76 ± 5.29, 25.18 ± 4.68 p < 0.0001) respectively. In multivariable linear regression analysis being non-breast cancer (Adjusted beta coefficient (Adj.β.coff). = 3.34, 95% CI (1.92-4.76) p < 0.001), hemoglobin gm/dl (Adj.β.coff =0.34, 95% CI (0.04-0.63) p = 0.02), and primary education (Adj.β.coff =2.98 95%CI (1.16-4.96) p = 0.001) secondary level and more education (Adj.β.coff = 5.47, 95%CI (3.51-7.28) p < 0.001) were significantly associated with MMSE cognitive score. CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients had lower mean MMSE scores when compared to non-breast cancer women. Higher hemoglobin level and higher level of education increase the MMSE cognitive score. Clinicians should incorporate routine screening of cognitive functioning for breast cancer patients and further study is required to evaluate cognitive impairment among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgeit Abebe
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Tesfaye Tollesa
- Department of Medical Physiology, Addis Ababa University, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Mathewos Assefa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Addis Ababa University, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Referral Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Zelalem Tilahun
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Yohannes Dinku
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Madda Wallabu University, Bale, Ethiopia
| | - Sofonyas Abebaw
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Melkalem Mamuye
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bury-Kamińska M, Szudy-Szczyrek A, Nowaczyńska A, Jankowska-Łęcka O, Hus M, Kot K. Chemotherapy-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning and Their Biological Predictors in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Brain Sci 2021; 11:1166. [PMID: 34573187 PMCID: PMC8466339 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The paper presents a study on the changes in cognitive functioning in patients undergoing chemotherapy with diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of the study was to answer the following two main research questions: Does the treatment stage differentiate the functioning of cognitive processes in patients with diagnosed MM and to what extent? Is it possible to treat biological factors (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and BDNF) as predictors of patients' cognitive functioning? The patients were examined twice, before the treatment and after 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Selected neuropsychological research methods as well as experimental and clinical trials were employed to diagnose the patients' general cognitive state, attention, memory, and executive functions. The level of biological factors was assessed with the ELISA test. The results show that the patients' cognitive functioning was worse before the treatment than during the cytostatic therapy. It was also possible to predict the cognitive state of patients suffering from multiple myeloma based on a selected biological parameter (neurotrophin BDNF).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Bury-Kamińska
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, 45 Głęboka, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
| | - Aneta Szudy-Szczyrek
- Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 2 Karmelicka, 20-400 Lublin, Poland; (A.S.-S.); (A.N.); (O.J.-Ł.); (M.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Aleksandra Nowaczyńska
- Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 2 Karmelicka, 20-400 Lublin, Poland; (A.S.-S.); (A.N.); (O.J.-Ł.); (M.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Olga Jankowska-Łęcka
- Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 2 Karmelicka, 20-400 Lublin, Poland; (A.S.-S.); (A.N.); (O.J.-Ł.); (M.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Marek Hus
- Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 2 Karmelicka, 20-400 Lublin, Poland; (A.S.-S.); (A.N.); (O.J.-Ł.); (M.H.); (K.K.)
| | - Klaudia Kot
- Department of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, 2 Karmelicka, 20-400 Lublin, Poland; (A.S.-S.); (A.N.); (O.J.-Ł.); (M.H.); (K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Neuroinflammation and Its Association with Cognition, Neuronal Markers and Peripheral Inflammation after Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13164198. [PMID: 34439351 PMCID: PMC8391457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Up to 70% of chemotherapy-treated patients experience problems with memory and concentration, potentially caused by direct and indirect neurotoxicity, such as (neuro-)inflammatory processes. Can neuroinflammation changes be detected in chemotherapy-treated patients with breast cancer using translocator protein [18F]DPA714 simultaneous positron emission tomographic- and magnetic resonance imaging? Moreover, what is the association with clinical biomarkers? In a study including 19 chemotherapy-treated breast cancer patients, 18 chemotherapy-naïve and 37 healthy controls, we found significant relative glial overexpression in parietal and occipital brain regions in chemotherapy-treated patients compared to controls, which were associated with cognitive abnormalities and markers of neuronal survival. Shortly after ending chemotherapy, changes in brain neuroinflammation seem to occur, possibly contributing to the cognitive decline seen in breast cancer patients. Additionally, blood levels of an axonal damage marker were 20-fold higher in chemotherapy-treated patients, providing evidence for its use as a biomarker to assess neurotoxic effects of anticancer chemotherapies. Abstract To uncover mechanisms underlying chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment in breast cancer, we studied new biomarkers of neuroinflammation and neuronal survival. This cohort study included 74 women (47 ± 10 years) from 22 October 2017 until 20 August 2020. Nineteen chemotherapy-treated and 18 chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer were assessed one month after the completion of surgery and/or chemotherapy, and 37 healthy controls were included. Assessments included neuropsychological testing, questionnaires, blood sampling for 17 inflammatory and two neuronal survival markers (neurofilament light-chain (NfL), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and PET-MR neuroimaging. To investigate neuroinflammation, translocator protein (TSPO) [18F]DPA714-PET-MR was acquired for 15 participants per group, and evaluated by volume of distribution normalized to the cerebellum. Chemotherapy-treated patients showed higher TSPO expression, indicative for neuroinflammation, in the occipital and parietal lobe when compared to healthy controls or chemotherapy-naïve patients. After partial-volume correction, differences with healthy controls persisted (pFWE < 0.05). Additionally, compared to healthy- or chemotherapy-naïve controls, cognitive impairment (17–22%) and altered levels in blood markers (F ≥ 3.7, p ≤ 0.031) were found in chemotherapy-treated patients. NfL, an axonal damage marker, was particularly sensitive in differentiating groups (F = 105, p = 4.2 × 10 −21), with levels 20-fold higher in chemotherapy-treated patients. Lastly, in chemotherapy-treated patients alone, higher local TSPO expression was associated with worse cognitive performance, higher blood levels of BDNF/NfL, and decreased fiber cross-section in the corpus callosum (pFWE < 0.05). These findings suggest that increased neuroinflammation is associated with chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer. Additionally, NfL could be a useful biomarker to assess neurotoxic effects of anticancer chemotherapies.
Collapse
|
23
|
Magnuson A, Ahles T, Chen BT, Mandelblatt J, Janelsins MC. Cognitive Function in Older Adults With Cancer: Assessment, Management, and Research Opportunities. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2138-2149. [PMID: 34043437 PMCID: PMC8260910 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Magnuson
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - Tim Ahles
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Bihong T. Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jeanne Mandelblatt
- Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Michelle C. Janelsins
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Morgans AK, Renzulli J, Olivier K, Shore ND. Risk of Cognitive Effects in Comorbid Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Receptor Inhibitors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:467.e1-467.e11. [PMID: 33893042 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is primarily a disease of older men. As the risk of neurocognitive decline increases as people age, cognitive dysfunction is a potential complication in men with PC, imposing detrimental effects on functional independence and quality of life. Importantly, risk of cognitive decline may increase with exposure to androgen deprivation therapy and other hormonal therapies. Particular consideration should be given to patients with castration-resistant PC (CRPC), many of whom require continuous, long-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor. Non-comparative evidence from interventional trials of androgen receptor inhibitors in men with non-metastatic CRPC suggests differential effects on cognitive function and central nervous system-related adverse events within this drug class. Drug-drug interactions with concomitant medications for chronic, non-malignant comorbidities differ among ARIs and thus may contribute further to cognitive impairment. Hence, establishing baseline cognitive function is a prerequisite to identifying subsequent clinical decline associated with androgen receptor-targeted therapies. Although brief, sensitive screening tools for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction are lacking, mental status can be ascertained from the initial medical history and neurocognitive examination, progressing to more in-depth evaluation when impairment is suspected. On-treatment neurocognitive monitoring should be integrated into regular clinical follow-up to preserve cognitive function and quality of life throughout disease management. This review summarizes the multiple factors that may contribute to cognitive decline in men with CRPC, awareness of which will assist clinicians to optimize individual treatment. Practical, clinic-based strategies for managing the risks for and symptoms of cognitive dysfunction are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia K Morgans
- Department of Medicine (Hematology and Oncology), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Joseph Renzulli
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Kara Olivier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Neal D Shore
- Department of Urology, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Atlantic Urology Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Krishna S, Kakaizada S, Almeida N, Brang D, Hervey-Jumper S. Central Nervous System Plasticity Influences Language and Cognitive Recovery in Adult Glioma. Neurosurgery 2021; 89:539-548. [PMID: 33476391 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas exist within the framework of complex neuronal circuitry in which network dynamics influence both tumor biology and cognition. The generalized impairment of cognition or loss of language function is a common occurrence for glioma patients. The interface between intrinsic brain tumors such as gliomas and functional cognitive networks are poorly understood. The ability to communicate effectively is critically important for receiving oncological therapies and maintaining a high quality of life. Although the propensity of gliomas to infiltrate cortical and subcortical structures and disrupt key anatomic language pathways is well documented, there is new evidence offering insight into the network and cellular mechanisms underpinning glioma-related aphasia and aphasia recovery. In this review, we will outline the current understanding of the mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction and recovery, using aphasia as an illustrative model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saritha Krishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sofia Kakaizada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Nyle Almeida
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - David Brang
- Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Boscher C, Joly F, Clarisse B, Humbert X, Grellard JM, Binarelli G, Tron L, Licaj I, Lange M. Perceived Cognitive Impairment in Breast Cancer Survivors and Its Relationships with Psychological Factors. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12103000. [PMID: 33081111 PMCID: PMC7602817 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12103000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cognitive complaints are common adverse effects for breast cancer survivors, with potential negative impacts on quality of life or return to work. Identifying subjects at risk could allow to reduce cognitive disorders or to set up appropriate care. In this study we explored current cognitive complaints reported by breast cancer survivors, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition (FACT-Cog) questionnaire and examined the relationships between current cognitive complaints and current psychological symptoms (especially post-traumatic stress symptoms). This large survey showed that about half of breast cancer survivors reported cognitive complaints after cancer treatments. These complaints were mainly associated with chemotherapy, age, self-reported sleep difficulties, the frequency of psychotropic treatments and psychological factors including post-traumatic stress symptoms or. Some modifiable risk factors should be detected early to reduce persistent cognitive complaints after cancer, including sleep difficulties and post-traumatic stress symptoms. Abstract Cognitive complaints are common adverse effects in cancer patients. Identifying subjects at risk could make it possible to limit their impact. We aimed to explore the relationship between current cognitive complaints and demographic and psychological factors in a group of breast cancer survivors. Through an online survey, cancer survivors reported current cognitive complaints using the FACT-Cog questionnaire (Perceived Cognitive Impairment) and answered questions about their demographics, lifestyle and cancer-related characteristics. Anxiety, depression, fatigue and post-traumatic stress symptoms were also assessed. We used multivariable logistic regression models to explore the relationships between current cognitive complaints and social and psychological factors. Among the 1393 breast cancer survivors, 47.2% (n = 657) reported current cognitive complaints. Chemotherapy (OR = 2.26, 95%CI = 1.67–3.05), age (OR21-44 vs. >65 = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.07–0.27), sleep difficulties (ORnever vs. often = 2.41, 95%CI = 1.47–3.95), frequency of psychotropic treatments (ORnever vs. >1/week = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.23–2.36), post-traumatic stress symptoms (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.57–2.69) and employment status (ORfull-time or part-time vs. sick leave = 1.64, 95%CI = 1.08–2.49) were strongly associated with current cognitive complaints. In this large study, about half of breast cancer survivors reported cognitive complaints, particularly after chemotherapy. Some risk factors should be detected early to reduce persistent cognitive complaints after cancer: mainly sleep difficulties, post-traumatic stress symptoms and psychotropic medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Boscher
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-669-39-78-77
| | - Florence Joly
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France;
- Cancer and cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Caen, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Bénédicte Clarisse
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
| | - Xavier Humbert
- Department of General Medicine, Medical School, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Pharmacology, University Hospital Caen, 14000 Caen, France
- EA4650, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jean-Michel Grellard
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
| | - Giulia Binarelli
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Laure Tron
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France;
- Cancer and cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Idlir Licaj
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
- Cancer and cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The UiT Arctic University of Norway, 9010 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marie Lange
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen, France; (F.J.); (B.C.); (J.-M.G.); (G.B.); (I.L.); (M.L.)
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France;
- Cancer and cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Joly F, Castel H, Tron L, Lange M, Vardy J. Potential Effect of Immunotherapy Agents on Cognitive Function in Cancer Patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:123-127. [PMID: 31504664 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A paradigm shift is occurring in cancer therapy, where instead of targeting tumor cells, immunotherapy agents (IA) target the immune system to overcome cancer tolerance and to stimulate an antitumor immune response. IA using immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cells have emerged as the most encouraging approaches to treat cancer patients. CPI are reported to induce moderate-to-severe neurologic immune-related adverse events in less than 1% of patients, whereas chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is associated with frequent neurological toxicities that can be severe or even fatal. Cognitive difficulties have been described following chemotherapy and targeted therapy, but not specifically explored in patients receiving IA. The aim of this review is to establish a picture of the first published studies suggesting some biological and physiopathological effects of IA on cognitive functions among cancer patients. The first results originate from a preclinical study evaluating the role of CPI associated with peripheral radiation on cognitive dysfunction and the recent discovery of the central nervous lymphatic system allowing leukocytes to penetrate the central nervous system. Evaluating possible side effects of IA on cognitive function will be an important challenge for future clinical trials and for better understanding the underlying mechanisms through preclinical animal models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Joly
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Normandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM, ANTICIPE, Caen, France.,Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Caen, France.,University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Hélène Castel
- Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM U1239, DC2N, Rouen, France.,Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Rouen, France
| | - Laure Tron
- Normandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM, ANTICIPE, Caen, France.,Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Caen, France.,University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Marie Lange
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Normandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM, ANTICIPE, Caen, France.,Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Caen, France
| | - Janette Vardy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Administration of systemic antineoplastic agents can result in adverse neurologic events. We describe the clinicopathologic features and putative mechanisms underlying iatrogenic neuropathology of the central nervous system secondary to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and conventional chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Torre
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mel B Feany
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Anderson DE, Kedar S, Bhatt VR, Schmid K, Holstein SA, Rizzo M. Neurophysiologic and ophthalmic markers of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in patients diagnosed with hematologic cancer: A feasibility study. J Neurol Sci 2020; 410:116644. [PMID: 31901718 PMCID: PMC7043069 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biomarkers of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in hematologic cancer are understudied and underdeveloped. We evaluated the feasibility of using ophthalmic and neurophysiologic markers to assess CRCI in hematologic cancer. METHODS Hematologic cancer patients either receiving (Ctx+) or not receiving (Ctx-) chemotherapy were recruited from a tertiary medical center. Demographically-matched healthy controls (HC) were also recruited. Ctx+ participants completed the following study visits: (1) after diagnosis but prior to chemotherapy (baseline); (2) after one treatment cycle (one-month post-baseline); and (3) after three treatment cycles (three-months post-baseline). Comparison subjects completed assessments at similar intervals. Participants completed: (1) neuropsychological assessments of attention and executive function; (2) neurophysiologic assessments of control over spatial attention and working memory; and (3) ophthalmic assessments of contrast sensitivity and optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS We enrolled 45 participants (15 per group), and 30 participants (Ctx+ = 8; Ctx- = 10; HC = 12) completed all study visits. Ctx+ participants performed worse than HC participants on neuropsychological measures of attention and executive function. Both Ctx+ and Ctx- participants showed changes in neurophysiologic measures of control over spatial attention that differed from HC participants. Ctx+ participants showed chemotherapy-related declines in contrast sensitivity that were predicted by OCT retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) changes. Changes in neurophysiologic measures of control over spatial attention were also predicted by OCT RNFL changes. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the feasibility of using ophthalmic and neurophysiologic markers as rapid and non-invasive measures that may be useful for tracking CRCI in hematologic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Anderson
- Department of Neurological Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), USA; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, UNMC, USA; Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, UNMC, USA; Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute, USA.
| | - Sachin Kedar
- Department of Neurological Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), USA; Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, UNMC, USA; Stanley M. Truhlsen Eye Institute, USA
| | - Vijaya R Bhatt
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, UNMC, USA; Division of Oncology & Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, UNMC, USA
| | - Kendra Schmid
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, UNMC, USA
| | - Sarah A Holstein
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, UNMC, USA; Division of Oncology & Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, UNMC, USA
| | - Matthew Rizzo
- Department of Neurological Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), USA; Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, UNMC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Joly F, Lange M, Dos Santos M, Vaz-Luis I, Di Meglio A. Long-Term Fatigue and Cognitive Disorders in Breast Cancer Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:E1896. [PMID: 31795208 PMCID: PMC6966680 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11121896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Survivors of early-stage breast cancer may report treatment-related side effects that persist for several years after the end of primary treatment. Among these, fatigue and cognitive disorders are frequent complaints and can negatively impact quality of life. Cancer-related fatigue is a very prevalent and distressing long-term side effect among breast cancer survivors that typically improves after completion of treatment, although many patients report severe fatigue several years post-treatment. Cognitive disorders are also common among survivors of breast cancer, especially if treated with chemotherapy. These symptoms are usually mild-to-moderate and often transient. Cognitive recovery is frequently observed within months or a few years after completion of chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. However, some breast cancer survivors may have persistent cognitive difficulties. Several types of interventions have proved to be beneficial in reducing cancer-related fatigue and cognitive difficulties. Most of these interventions for cancer-related fatigue are thought to be effective by reducing inflammation or disrupting pro-inflammatory circuits. Further studies are needed on cognitive management that has showed promising results. This narrative review summarizes the state of the art regarding long-term fatigue and cognitive disorders in patients with early breast cancer, describing prevalence, impact, pathophysiology, and risk factors, and focusing on available interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Joly
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.L.); (M.D.S.)
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
- University Hospital of Caen, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Marie Lange
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.L.); (M.D.S.)
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Melanie Dos Santos
- Clinical Research Department, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (M.L.); (M.D.S.)
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Cancer and Cognition Platform, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, 14000 Caen, France
- University Hospital of Caen, 14000 Caen, France
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France; (I.V.-L.); (A.D.M.)
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France; (I.V.-L.); (A.D.M.)
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France; (I.V.-L.); (A.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Van Dyk K, Ganz PA. The inflammation complication: New evidence in cancer-related cognitive impairment. Brain Behav Immun 2019; 81:6-7. [PMID: 31176729 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Van Dyk
- UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Biro E, Kahan Z, Kalman J, Rusz O, Pakaski M, Irinyi T, Kelemen G, Dudás R, Drotos G, Hamvai C. Cognitive Functioning and Psychological Well-being in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy. In Vivo 2019; 33:1381-1392. [PMID: 31280234 PMCID: PMC6689374 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Anti-cancer therapies may deteriorate cognitive functioning, affective functioning and psychological well-being. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective longitudinal pilot study, premenopausal and postmenopausal patients received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) (tamoxifen with or without LHRH analog or aromatase inhibitor) or were observed only (control group). At baseline testing and 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter, cognitive, depression and anxiety tests and quality of life (QOL) measurements were performed. RESULTS Overall, 46 cases were evaluated. None of the studied cognitive parameters differed between the subgroups or changed by time. No differences were found regarding anxiety, depression or QOL measures either. Baseline cognitive test and QOL results were in association with later anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION No cognitive impairment was found during the two years of ET. Baseline cognitive scores and QOL dimensions proved good predictors of later anxiety and depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edit Biro
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Kahan
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Janos Kalman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Orsolya Rusz
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Tamas Irinyi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gyöngyi Kelemen
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Rita Dudás
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gergely Drotos
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Csaba Hamvai
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Amidi A, Wu LM. Structural brain alterations following adult non-CNS cancers: a systematic review of the neuroimaging literature. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:522-536. [PMID: 30732518 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1563716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background: Cancer and cancer treatments may impact the brain through several pathways leading to cognitive impairment. Neuroimaging evidence has begun to elucidate the neurobiological underpinnings of cancer-related cognitive impairment. The aim of this paper was to systematically review available literature on structural brain alterations following adult non-central nervous system (CNS) cancers and associated treatments. Methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID#107387). Comprehensive searches were conducted in June 2018 using PubMed and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were English peer-reviewed journal articles of formal, controlled studies that examined structural neuroimaging outcomes in adult non-CNS cancer patients and survivors. Selected articles were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Results: Thirty-six publications of prospective and cross-sectional studies met inclusion criteria and were included. Structural brain alterations following cancer and its treatment were reported in a majority of the publications as evidenced by reduced global and local gray matter volumes, impaired white matter microstructural integrity, and brain network alterations. Structural alterations were most often evident when cancer-treated groups were compared with healthy controls, and more subtle when compared with cancer controls. Regarding the existence of pretreatment impairments, the evidence was equivocal. There was significant between-study heterogeneity in imaging analytical approaches and use of statistical adjustments. Over half reported associations with cognitive outcomes, though regions and associated cognitive domains were heterogeneous. Conclusions: Structural brain alterations following cancer and cancer treatments were reported in a majority of the reviewed studies. However, the extent of observed alterations depended on the choice of comparison groups. Methodological issues exist that will need to be addressed systematically to ensure the validity of findings. Large-scale prospective studies with extended assessment points are warranted to replicate and build upon initial findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Amidi
- Department of Psychology & Behavioural Sciences, Unit for Psycho-Oncology & Health Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa M. Wu
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Anusa AM, Thavarajah R. Risk of cognition alteration and emotional frailty via circulating transcriptome in treatment naïve head and neck squamous cell cancer patients. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2019; 9:143-150. [PMID: 30949427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a dearth of research examining the association between differential expression (DE) of genetic transcritome associated with cognition alteration (CA) and emotional frailty (EF) in treatment naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. The present study was undertaken to identify the DE of mRNA of CA-EF in HNSCC tumor and correlate with clinical and other known genetic factors that promote oncogenesis as well as CA-EF. Material and methods Using Genome-Wide Association Studies, putative genes associated with CA-EF(Prixie Fixie score ≥0.10) were identified. The DE of the mRNA of the thus selected genes were obtained from The CANCER GENOME ATLAS - HNSCC patients along with clinical details. The DE of mRNA pertaining to known factors such as inflammation, serotonergic and dopaminergic functions as well as clinical parameters were studied for association with the risk of DE of CA-EF. Appropriate statistics were performed and P ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. Results A total of 520 HNSCC patients formed study group. There were 77 (14.81%) patients at risk for CD, 41 (7.9%) for CI and 113 (21.73%) for EF risk. In all, 103 (19.81%) HNSCC patients of this cohort had DE of mRNA of genes associated with CA. Inflammation, circadian genes, mTOR pathway, invasion and metastasis set of genes had a significant association with the risk of DE of CA-EF. Discussion Transcriptome's have been postulated to mediate CA-EF by targeted action on human brain. Differential Expression of putative genes associated with CA-EF have been demonstrated in HNSCC tumor. These DE could predispose the patients to CA-EF by the action of gene-environmental as well as psycho-social constructs. As CA-EF could adversely influence the treatment and alter the quality of life among survivors, screening for CA-EF at HNSCC presentation becomes imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Anusa
- Dept of Psychiatry, Shri Satya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Affiliated to Shri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Ammapettai, Kanchipuram, India
| | - Rooban Thavarajah
- Marundeeshwara Oral Pathology Services and Analytics, B-1, Mistral Apartments, Wipro Street, Shollinganallur, Chennai, 600 119, India
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To address the estimated rates of incidence, potential underlying etiologies, and cognitive domains affected from diagnosis and treatment. To describe potential cognitive function interventions. DATA SOURCES PubMed. CONCLUSION Adults with gliomas report that the most distressing, persistent, and greatest negative impact on their lives relates to the cognitive impairment they experience. However, there are several potential interventions that may prevent cognitive decline during treatment or maintain cognitive function long term. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Awareness of cognitive sequela that adults with gliomas face can lead to early identification, full neurocognitive profiling, and implementation of evidence-based interventions for those experiencing cognitive impairments following cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
36
|
Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, Hurria A, Jim H, McDonald BC, Graham D, Zhou X, Clapp J, Zhai W, Breen E, Carroll JE, Denduluri N, Dilawari A, Extermann M, Isaacs C, Jacobsen PB, Kobayashi LC, Holohan Nudelman K, Root J, Stern RA, Tometich D, Turner R, VanMeter JW, Saykin AJ, Ahles T. Cancer-Related Cognitive Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO1800140. [PMID: 30281396 PMCID: PMC7237199 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine treatment and aging-related effects on longitudinal cognitive function in older breast cancer survivors. METHODS Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 344) and matched controls without cancer (n = 347) 60 years of age and older without dementia or neurologic disease were recruited between August 2010 and December 2015. Data collection occurred during presystemic treatment/control enrollment and at 12 and 24 months through biospecimens; surveys; self-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; and neuropsychological tests that measured attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM). Linear mixed-effects models tested two-way interactions of treatment group (control, chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, and hormonal therapy) and time and explored three-way interactions of ApoE (ε4+ v not) by group by time; covariates included baseline age, frailty, race, and cognitive reserve. RESULTS Survivors and controls were 60 to 98 years of age, were well educated, and had similar baseline cognitive scores. Treatment was related to longitudinal cognition scores, with survivors who received chemotherapy having increasingly worse APE scores ( P = .05) and those initiating hormonal therapy having lower LM scores at 12 months ( P = .03) than other groups. These group-by-time differences varied by ApoE genotype, where only ε4+ survivors receiving hormone therapy had short-term decreases in adjusted LM scores (three-way interaction P = .03). For APE, the three-way interaction was not significant ( P = .14), but scores were significantly lower for ε4+ survivors exposed to chemotherapy (-0.40; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.01) at 24 months than ε4+ controls (0.01; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18; P < .05). Increasing age was associated with lower baseline scores on all cognitive measures ( P < .001); frailty was associated with baseline APE and self-reported decline ( P < .001). CONCLUSION Breast cancer systemic treatment and aging-related phenotypes and genotypes are associated with longitudinal decreases in cognitive function scores in older survivors. These data could inform treatment decision making and survivorship care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Brent J. Small
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Gheorghe Luta
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Heather Jim
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Brenna C. McDonald
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Deena Graham
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Xingtao Zhou
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan Clapp
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Wanting Zhai
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth Breen
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Judith E. Carroll
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Neelima Denduluri
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Asma Dilawari
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Martine Extermann
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Paul B. Jacobsen
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsay C. Kobayashi
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Kelly Holohan Nudelman
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - James Root
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Robert A. Stern
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Danielle Tometich
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Raymond Turner
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - John W. VanMeter
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J. Saykin
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Tim Ahles
- Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lange M, Joly F. How to Identify and Manage Cognitive Dysfunction After Breast Cancer Treatment. J Oncol Pract 2018; 13:784-790. [PMID: 29232539 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2017.026286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Attention and memory dysfunction is a common complaint among patients with breast cancer that can be reported during and up to several years after treatment. It can negatively affect patients' quality of life and their ability to work. This phenomenon has mainly been studied in patients with breast cancer who are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Women describe concentration problems and difficulties with word finding, multitasking, or remembering new information, as well as more effort and time needed to accomplish these tasks. Such cognitive dysfunction is subtle or moderate and occurs in 15% to 25% of patients. Older patients seem more likely to experience cognitive decline with chemotherapy than do young women with breast cancer. Patients who report that cognitive dysfunction has affected their daily lives for 6 to 12 months after the end of chemotherapy or during hormone therapy may need referral to a neuropsychologist. During the cognitive assessment, the etiology of their cognitive complaints is sought and neuropsychological tests are administered to assess objective cognitive functioning. Psychological factors-fatigue and pain-should be assessed systematically with cognitive complaints to identify precisely the cause of the problems. A nonpharmacologic approach-mainly cognitive rehabilitation-seems to be the most promising for the management of these difficulties, but these preliminary results require confirmation. In the future, early detection of cognitive impairment and cognitive rehabilitation should be included in the portfolio of oncology supportive care to facilitate the return to work of young women and to avoid potential repercussions on adherence to oral treatments and on autonomy in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Lange
- Centre François Baclesse; Normandie University, UNICAEN, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1086, ANTICIPE; and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Florence Joly
- Centre François Baclesse; Normandie University, UNICAEN, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1086, ANTICIPE; and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Yang L, Koyanagi A, Smith L, Hu L, Colditz GA, Toriola AT, López Sánchez GF, Vancampfort D, Hamer M, Stubbs B, Waldhör T. Hand grip strength and cognitive function among elderly cancer survivors. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197909. [PMID: 29864112 PMCID: PMC5986134 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the associations of handgrip strength and cognitive function in cancer survivors ≥ 60 years old using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Data in two waves of NHANES (2011–2014) were aggregated. Handgrip strength in kilogram (kg) was defined as the maximum value achieved using either hand. Two cognitive function tests were conducted among adults 60 years and older. The Animal Fluency Test (AFT) examines categorical verbal fluency (a component of executive function), and the Digital Symbol Substitution test (DSST) assesses processing speed, sustained attention, and working memory. Survey analysis procedures were used to account for the complex sampling design of the NHANES. Multiple linear regression models were used to estimate associations of handgrip strength with cognitive test scores, adjusting for confounders (age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, smoking status, depressive symptoms and leisure time physical activity). Results Among 383 cancer survivors (58.5% women, mean age = 70.9 years, mean BMI = 29.3 kg/m2), prevalent cancer types were breast (22.9%), prostate (16.4%), colon (6.9%) and cervix (6.2%). In women, each increase in kg of handgrip strength was associated with 0.20 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.33) higher score on AFT and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.30 to 1.35) higher score on DSST. In men, we observed an inverted U-shape association where cognitive function peaked at handgrip strength of 40–42 kg. Conclusions Handgrip strength, a modifiable factor, appears to be associated with aspects of cognitive functions in cancer survivors. Prospective studies are needed to address their causal relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yang
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ai Koyanagi
- Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona,Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Dr. Antoni Pujadas, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lee Smith
- The Cambridge Centre for Sports & Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Liang Hu
- Department of Sport Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States of America
| | - Adetunji T Toriola
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States of America
| | | | - Davy Vancampfort
- University Psychiatric Centre Catholic University Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium
| | - Mark Hamer
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Physiotherapy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Waldhör
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chemotherapy and cognition: International cognition and cancer task force recommendations for harmonising preclinical research. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 69:72-83. [PMID: 29909223 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Cancer survivors who undergo chemotherapy for non-CNS tumours often report substantial cognitive disturbances that adversely affect quality of life, during and after treatment. The neurotoxic effects of anti-cancer drugs have been confirmed in clinical and pre-clinical research. Work with animals has also identified a range of factors and underlying mechanisms that contribute to chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment. However, there is a continuing need to develop standard cognitive testing procedures for validation and comparison purposes, broaden the search for biological and neurochemical mechanisms, and develop improved animal models for investigating the combined effects of treatment, the disease, and other potential factors (e.g., age, stress). In this paper, a working group, formed under the auspices of the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force, reviews the state of pre-clinical research, formulates strategic priorities, and provides recommendations to guide animal research that meaningfully informs clinical investigations.
Collapse
|
40
|
Longitudinal assessment of chemotherapy-induced changes in brain and cognitive functioning: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 92:304-317. [PMID: 29791867 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
In addition to the burden of a life-threatening diagnosis, cancer patients are struggling with adverse side-effects from cancer treatment. Chemotherapy has been linked to an array of cognitive impairments and alterations in brain structure and function ("chemobrain"). In this review, we summarized the existing evidence that evaluate the changes in cognitive functioning and brain with chemotherapy, as assessed using structural and functional MRI-based techniques in a longitudinal design. This review followed the latest PRISMA guidelines using Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with date restrictions from 2012 to 2017. Fourteen research articles met the key inclusion criteria: (i) the studies involved adult cancer patients (mean age ≥ 18); (ii) the use of chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer; (iii) pre-post assessment of behavioral and brain-based outcomes; and (iv) abstracts written in English. Effect sizes of subjective and objective cognitive impairments from the reviewed studies were estimated using Cohen's d or z-scores. We calculated percentage of mean change or effect sizes for main neuroimaging findings when data were available. Strength of the correlations between brain alterations and cognitive changes was obtained using squared correlation coefficients. Small to medium effect sizes were shown? on individual tests of attention, processing speed, verbal memory, and executive control; and medium effect sizes on self-report questionnaires. Neuroimaging data showed reduced grey matter density in cancer patients in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions. Changes in brain function (brain activation and cerebral blood flow) were observed with cancer across functional networks involving (pre)frontal, parietal, occipital, temporal, and cerebellar regions. Data from diffusion-weighted MRI suggested reduced white matter integrity involving the superior longitudinal fasciculus, corpus callosum, forceps major, and corona radiate, and altered structural connectivity across the whole brain network. Finally, we observed moderate-to-strong correlations between worsening cognitive function and morphological changes in frontal brain regions. While MRI is a powerful tool for detection of longitudinal brain changes in the 'chemobrain', the underlying biological mechanisms are still unclear. Continued work in this field will hopefully detect MRI metrics to be used as biomarkers to help guide cognitive treatment at the individual cancer patient level.
Collapse
|
41
|
Antoine V, Courtial M, de Wazieres B, Di Castri A, Duvjnak S, Geronimi L, Labarias C, Le Guillou C, Martin-Allier A, Matelot D, Moitrelle C, Santoni F, Solinas G, Viala M. [Cognitive decline in geriatric oncology: Trends, evaluation and treatment]. Bull Cancer 2018; 105:720-734. [PMID: 29773225 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Cancer prevalence increases with aging. Prevalent or incident neurocognitive disorders are frequent in geriatric oncology. Cognitive decline associated with cancer increases the risk of under or over-cancer treatment and makes therapeutic decisions complex. In this context, we present tools to optimize cognitive impairment screening, identification of underlying mechanisms and specific treatments. Geriatric specialists intervention can help global care, social services utilization and patient's orientation when ambulatory cares become difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Antoine
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France.
| | - M Courtial
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - B de Wazieres
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - A Di Castri
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - S Duvjnak
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - L Geronimi
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - C Labarias
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - C Le Guillou
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - A Martin-Allier
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - D Matelot
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - C Moitrelle
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - F Santoni
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - G Solinas
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - M Viala
- CHU de Caremeau, pôle de gérontologie, place Robert-Debré, 30000 Nîmes, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lhuissier E, Aury-Landas J, Bouet V, Bazille C, Repesse Y, Freret T, Boumédiene K, Baugé C. Evaluation of the impact of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase inhibitor, 3-deazaneplanocin A, on tissue injury and cognitive function in mice. Oncotarget 2018; 9:20698-20708. [PMID: 29755682 PMCID: PMC5945538 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer patients display cognitive impairment due, at least partly, to the treatments. Additionally, chemotherapeutic treatments can lead to organ injury, limiting their use, and are likely to have negative impacts on patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity of 3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNep) on several tissues and organs, as well as on cognitive functions. DZNep is an inhibitor of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase (in particular of the histone methyltransferase EZH2) which showed antitumoral functions in preclinical trials but whose effects on behavior and on organs (side effects) are not known. Chronic injections of DZNep were performed intraperitoneally in male NMRI mice (2 mg/kg; i.p.; three times per week) during 8 weeks. A follow-up of body weight was assessed during all experiments. Histological analysis were performed on several organs. EZH2 expression and H3K27me3 were assayed by western-blot. Several behavioral tests were performed during treatment and 2 weeks after. A particular focus was made on spontaneous locomotor activity, cognitive functions (spontaneous alternation and recognition memory), and anxiety- and depression-related behavior. Hematological modifications were also assessed. Chronic DZNep treatment transiently reduced animal growth. It had no effect on most organs but provoked a reversible splenomegaly, and persistent testis reduction and erythropoiesis. DZNep administration did not alter animal behavior. In conclusion, this study is encouraging for the use of DZNep for cancer treatment. Indeed, it has no effect on animal behavior, conferring an advantageous safety, and induces irreversible side effects limited on testis which are unfortunately found in most chemotherapy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Céline Bazille
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, BioConnecT, Caen, France.,CHU de Caen, Service d'Anatomie Pathologie, Caen, France
| | - Yohann Repesse
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, EFS, PhIND, Caen, France.,CHU de Caen, Hématologie biologique, Caen, France
| | - Thomas Freret
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, COMETE, Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CURB-BRP, Caen, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|