Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method for Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Present and Future

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and the liver: balancing therapeutic benefit and adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have led to breakthrough improvements in the management of malignancy including hepatocellular (HCC) and biliary tract cancer, improving decades-old standards of care and increasing patient survival. In both liver tumour types, which commonly arise in the context of liver inflammation and underlying functional impairment, the lack of validated predictors of response underscores the need to balance predicted gains in survival with risk of treatment-related hepatoxicity and decompensation of underlying chronic liver disease.In addition, the liver is implicated in the toxicity associated with ICI therapy for non-liver cancers, which exhibits a high degree of variability in presentation and severity. An accurate assessment is mandatory for the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced liver injury.In this Recent Advances article, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of efficacy and toxicity of anticancer immunotherapy in liver tumours and liver toxicity in extrahepatic malignancies.We compare and contrast characteristics, management strategies and outcomes from immune-related liver injury in patients with chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis or with an underlying healthy liver and discuss the latest findings on how toxicity and decompensation may impact the outlook of patients with liver tumours and extrahepatic malignancies offering insights into the future directions of clinical research and practice in the field.

Investigation of the Role of Chemical Analysis in Causality Assessment of Herbal and Dietary Supplement-Induced Liver Injury

BACKGROUND

 The attribution of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to specific herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) is confounded by inaccurate labels and undisclosed ingredients. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) determines the attribution of injury to an agent through its structured expert opinion causality assessment process, but without the use of chemical analysis data of HDS. We aimed to determine the impact of chemical analysis of HDS products on prior causality assessment scores.

METHODS

Obtained samples of HDS consumed by DILIN-enrolled patients were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Chemical analysis data were compared to label accuracy and detect whether the product contained botanical and non-botanical compounds. A comparison of the causality scores reassessed with chemical analysis was compared with the original scores.

RESULTS

A total of 54 previously adjudicated cases with chemical analysis available were reassessed for causality with chemical analysis data; reviewers were blinded to original causality scores. Using the chemical analysis data, 37% (n = 20) of the 54 cases were scored with a higher likelihood of DILI compared with the original causality scores; 14 of the 20 (70%) moved from probable to highly likely; 52% had no change in causality score; and 11% of cases were scored as a lower likelihood of DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

 Our study demonstrates that there is value in using HDS chemical analysis data in the causality assessment process for DILI. In more than a third of cases, chemical analysis of products led to an increased confidence in DILI attribution to HDS. These findings suggest that chemical analysis is an important tool in causality assessment for HDS agents, specifically in challenging situations, and further studies are needed to confirm its applicability in clinical practice.

A Rare Case of Tirzepatide-Induced Hepatotoxicity

Tirzepatide is the first dual incretin glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activator approved for the management of type II diabetes mellitus. This drug was also recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a management option for patients with obesity. Tirzepatide has been also reported to be beneficial in reducing liver fat content. Although its efficacy is well described in the literature, no cases of tirzepatide-induced hepatotoxicity have been reported. We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with metabolic syndrome who was noted to have elevated liver enzymes secondary to tirzepatide use.

Safety of pyrazinamide in elderly patients with tuberculosis in Japan: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is the standard first-line treatment for tuberculosis (TB); however, its safety in elderly patients has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We identified patients who were admitted for TB between July 2010 and March 2022. Patients were categorized into HRE (isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol) and HREZ (isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and PZA) groups. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and overall adverse events (characterized by a composite of hepatotoxicity, gout attack, allergic reactions and gastrointestinal intolerance). Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 90-day readmission and use of drugs related to the primary outcome adverse events. Data were analysed using propensity score matching; we also conducted a subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years.

RESULTS

Among 19,930 eligible patients, 8924 received HRE and 11,006 received HREZ. Propensity score matching created 3578 matched pairs with a mean age of approximately 80 years. Compared with the HRE group, the HREZ group demonstrated a higher proportion of overall adverse events (3.1% vs. 4.7%; p < 0.001), allergic reactions (1.4% vs. 2.5%; p < 0.001) and antihistamine use (21.9% vs. 27.6%; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding in-hospital mortality, hepatotoxicity or length of hospital stay between the groups. Subgroup analysis for those aged ≥75 years showed consistent results.

CONCLUSION

Medical practitioners may consider adding PZA to an initial treatment regimen even in elderly patients with TB.

Phytotherapy-Induced Hepatocytotoxicity: A Case Report

Herbal and complementary medicine are frequently integrated with conventional medicine. We aim to report a case of severe herbal-induced liver injury (HILI) due to chronic use of green tea and protein shake. We present both clinical and laboratory evidence implicating mitochondrial toxicity and an immune response leading to a hypersensitivity reaction to the products. We have recently treated a 39-year-old man with hepatotoxicity resulting from a combination of a green tea-containing powder and a branched-chain amino acid supplement that was commenced 2 months previously. The hepatotoxicity resolved by stopping the consumption of these products and no other cause was detected. We decided to perform a lymphocyte toxicity assay (LTA) to determine if there was laboratory support for this diagnosis. LTA (% toxicity) represents the response of the mitochondria to toxic injury. To determine the role of the proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the patient's reaction, we measured the level of cytokines and chemokine in the media of growing cells, exposed to each product or to a combination of products. The increased cytokines and chemokines are presented as the x-fold elevations from the upper limit of normal (ULN) for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) (pg/mL × 1.5 ULN) and interleukin (IL)-1β (pg/mL × 1.8 ULN). Higher elevations were found for interferon (IFN)-β, IFN-γ, IL-8, IL 13, IL-15 (pg/mL × 2 ULN), regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted (RANTES) (pg/mL × 2 ULN), and nuclear factor (NFκB) (pg/mL × 3 ULN). The highest increases were for vascular endothelial factor (VEGF) (pg/mL × 10 ULN), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (pg/mL × 13 ULN). An examination of cellular markers showed the difference between programmed cell death (apoptosis) and cell death due to necrosis. In our case, cytokeratin-ccK18 (M-30) U/L was within the normal limits, suggesting that apoptosis was normal, while ccK8(M65) U/L was elevated at 1.5 × ULN. This result implies that upon the treatment of the patient's lymphocytes with the products, the mechanism of toxicity is necrosis. In susceptible individuals, the combination of protein and herbal tea produces mitochondrial toxicity and a strong T-lymphocyte-1 response, leading to HILI. There is a need of international reporting of adverse drug reactions by clinicians, laboratories, and pharmaceutical manufacturers to drug regulatory authorities. This requires internationally accepted standard definitions of reactions, as well as criteria for assessment.

Striking Cholestatic Giant Cell Hepatitis Resulting in Fulminant Liver Failure After Garcinia Cambogia Use

Garcinia cambogia, a weight control herbal, can cause mild liver toxicity with nonspecific histologic changes. Herein, we reported a case of herbal-induced fulminant cholestatic giant cell hepatitis due to garcinia cambogia use. A 65-year-old woman with breast cancer treated 18 years earlier was admitted for obstructive jaundice for 2 weeks. She started using garcinia cambogia 3 months ago for weight loss. Physical exam showed scleral icterus. Serum studies excluded Wilson's disease, systemic infection including COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), autoimmune hepatitis, and metabolic or toxicologic causes. An urgent liver biopsy showed severe giant cell hepatitis in absence of HSV-1/2, cytomegalovirus, HBsAg and HBcAg (immunostain), and EBV (in situ hybridization). Despite supportive therapy, the patient developed grade 2-3 hepatic encephalopathy and necessitated liver transplant. The explanted liver was markedly atrophy, in which the most striking histologic finding was diffuse distribution of multinucleated giant hepatocytes with syncytial pattern in a background of extensive zone-1 accentuated, geographic, hemorrhagic, confluent hepatocytic necrosis, along with remarkable hepatocytic and canalicular cholestasis. Marked hepatocellular and sinusoidal iron orverload present. The patient recovered uneventfully.

The ameliorating effect of Rutin on hepatotoxicity and inflammation induced by the daily administration of vortioxetine in rats

BACKGROUND

Vortioxetine (VORTX) is a potent and selective type of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that is mainly prescribed for treating major depression along with mood disorders as the first drug of choice. Limited previous findings have indicated evidence of liver injury and hepatotoxicity associated with daily VORTX treatment. Rutin (RUT), which is known for its antioxidant properties, has demonstrated several beneficial health actions, including hepatoprotection. Therefore the current study aimed to evaluate and assess the ameliorative effect of RUT against the hepatotoxic actions of daily low and high-dose VORTX administration.

METHODS

The experimental design included six groups of rats, each divided equally. Control, rats exposed to RUT (25 mg/kg), rats exposed to VORTX (28 mg/kg), rats exposed to VORTX (28 mg/kg) + RUT (25 mg/kg), rats exposed to VORTX (80 mg/kg), and rats exposed to VORTX (80 mg/kg) + RUT (25 mg/kg). After 30 days from the daily exposure period, assessments were conducted for serum liver enzyme activities, hepatotoxicity biomarkers, liver antioxidant endogenous enzymes, DNA fragmentation, and histopathological studies of liver tissue.

RESULTS

Interestingly, the risk of liver damage and hepatotoxicity related to VORTX was attenuated by the daily co-administration of RUT. Significant improvements were observed among all detected liver functions, oxidative stress, and inflammatory biomarkers including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), glutathione S-transferase (GST), total protein, acid phosphatase, N-Acetyl-/β-glucosaminidase (β-NAG), β-Galactosidase (β-Gal), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), caspase 3, and cytochrom-C along with histopathological studies, compared to the control and sole RUT group.

CONCLUSION

Thus, RUT can be considered a potential and effective complementary therapy in preventing hepatotoxicity and liver injury induced by the daily or prolonged administration of VORTX.

Herb induced liver injury by Xianling Gubao Tablets: A case assessed for causality using updated RUCAM and integrated evidence chain

Objective

A typical case of Xianling Gubao (XLGB) Tablets-induced liver injury was systematically studied in the clinic and the laboratory.

Methods

A patient with herb-induced liver injury (HILI) and a history of taking XLGB Tablets before disease onset was engaged as the study subject, and the case was diagnosed according to the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) and the integrated evidence chain (iEC) method recommended by the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Herb-induced Liver Injury (HILI Guidelines).

Results

Clinical history, biochemical indexes and imaging tests were used to exclude the influence of fundamental diseases and confusing liver diseases such as viral, alcoholic and autoimmune liver diseases on the diagnosis. Based on an investigation of the patient's medication history, she was suspected to have HILI caused by XLGB Tablets, as the patient was only taking an oral preparation of XLGB Tablets, and the influence of other drugs on the diagnosis was excluded. This patient with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥ 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and a calculated R of 6 was diagnosed with possible acute drug-induced hepatocellular injury. The relationship was considered "highly probable" (score of 9) using the updated RUCAM of 2016. Moreover, the fingerprint similarity between the preparation taken by the patient and a commercially available preparation was 0.99, suggesting that the patient was consuming XLGB Tablets rather than another drug. LC-MS technology and the Agilent Fake TCM-Drugs database were used to investigate the drug, and no chemical additions were found. Examination of the drug for pesticide residues, heavy metals, aflatoxins and other exogenous substances indicated compliance with the content limits of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia.

Conclusion

In summary, the final diagnosis of XLGB-induced liver injury reached the clinical diagnosis of HILI and was acute severe hepatocellular injury type by the updated RUCAM and iEC. Therefore, this study provides scientific evidence regarding the causality evaluation of compound preparations of traditional Chinese medicines-induced liver injury.

Hemochromatosis: Ferroptosis, ROS, Gut Microbiome, and Clinical Challenges with Alcohol as Confounding Variable

Hemochromatosis represents clinically one of the most important genetic storage diseases of the liver caused by iron overload, which is to be differentiated from hepatic iron overload due to excessive iron release from erythrocytes in patients with genetic hemolytic disorders. This disorder is under recent mechanistic discussion regarding ferroptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), the gut microbiome, and alcohol abuse as a risk factor, which are all topics of this review article. Triggered by released intracellular free iron from ferritin via the autophagic process of ferritinophagy, ferroptosis is involved in hemochromatosis as a specific form of iron-dependent regulated cell death. This develops in the course of mitochondrial injury associated with additional iron accumulation, followed by excessive production of ROS and lipid peroxidation. A low fecal iron content during therapeutic iron depletion reduces colonic inflammation and oxidative stress. In clinical terms, iron is an essential trace element required for human health. Humans cannot synthesize iron and must take it up from iron-containing foods and beverages. Under physiological conditions, healthy individuals allow for iron homeostasis by restricting the extent of intestinal iron depending on realistic demand, avoiding uptake of iron in excess. For this condition, the human body has no chance to adequately compensate through removal. In patients with hemochromatosis, the molecular finetuning of intestinal iron uptake is set off due to mutations in the high-FE2+ (HFE) genes that lead to a lack of hepcidin or resistance on the part of ferroportin to hepcidin binding. This is the major mechanism for the increased iron stores in the body. Hepcidin is a liver-derived peptide, which impairs the release of iron from enterocytes and macrophages by interacting with ferroportin. As a result, iron accumulates in various organs including the liver, which is severely injured and causes the clinically important hemochromatosis. This diagnosis is difficult to establish due to uncharacteristic features. Among these are asthenia, joint pain, arthritis, chondrocalcinosis, diabetes mellitus, hypopituitarism, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and cardiopathy. Diagnosis is initially suspected by increased serum levels of ferritin, a non-specific parameter also elevated in inflammatory diseases that must be excluded to be on the safer diagnostic side. Diagnosis is facilitated if ferritin is combined with elevated fasting transferrin saturation, genetic testing, and family screening. Various diagnostic attempts were published as algorithms. However, none of these were based on evidence or quantitative results derived from scored key features as opposed to other known complex diseases. Among these are autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) or drug-induced liver injury (DILI). For both diseases, the scored diagnostic algorithms are used in line with artificial intelligence (AI) principles to ascertain the diagnosis. The first-line therapy of hemochromatosis involves regular and life-long phlebotomy to remove iron from the blood, which improves the prognosis and may prevent the development of end-stage liver disease such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation is rarely performed, confined to acute liver failure. In conclusion, ferroptosis, ROS, the gut microbiome, and concomitant alcohol abuse play a major contributing role in the development and clinical course of genetic hemochromatosis, which requires early diagnosis and therapy initiation through phlebotomy as a first-line treatment.

Liver biopsy for assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis clinical trials: Expert consensus from the Liver Forum

BACKGROUND

Causality assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials can be challenging, and liver biopsies are not routinely performed as part of this evaluation. While the field is moving away from liver biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, information not identified by non-invasive testing may be provided on histology.

AIM

To address the appropriate utilisation of liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment in this setting.

METHODS

From 2020 to 2022, the Liver Forum convened a series of webinars on issues pertaining to liver biopsy during MASH trials. The Histology Working Group was formed to generate a series of consensus documents addressing these challenges. This manuscript focuses on liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment.

RESULTS

Expert opinion, guidance and recommendations on the role of liver biopsy as part of causality assessment of suspected DILI occurring during clinical trials for a drug(s) being developed for MASH are provided. Lessons learned from prior MASH programs are reviewed and gaps identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are no pathognomonic features, histologic evaluation of suspected DILI during MASH clinical trials may alter patient management, define the pattern and severity of injury, detect findings that favour a diagnosis of DILI versus MASH progression, identify prognostic features, characterise the clinicopathological phenotype of DILI, and/or define lesions that influence decisions about trial discontinuation and further development of the drug.

Patients with naproxen-induced liver injury display T-cell memory responses toward an oxidative (S)-O-desmethyl naproxen metabolite but not the acyl glucuronide

BACKGROUND

Exposure to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen (IBU) and naproxen (NAP) is associated with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Carboxylate bioactivation into reactive metabolites (e.g., acyl glucuronides, AG) and resulting T-cell activation is hypothesized as causal for this adverse event. However, conclusive evidence supporting this is lacking.

METHODS

In this work, we identify CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell hepatic infiltration in a biopsy from an IBU DILI patient. Lymphocyte transformation test and IFN-γ ELIspot, conducted on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with NAP-DILI, were used to explore drug-specific T-cell activation. T-cell clones (TCC) were generated and tested for drug specificity, phenotype/function, and pathways of T-cell activation. Cells were exposed to NAP, its oxidative metabolite 6-O-desmethyl NAP (DM-NAP), its AG or synthesized NAP-AG human-serum albumin adducts (NAP-AG adduct).

RESULTS

CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from patients expressing a range of different Vβ receptors were stimulated to proliferate and secrete IFN-γ and IL-22 when exposed to DM-NAP, but not NAP, NAP-AG or the NAP-AG adduct. Activation of the CD4+ TCC was HLA-DQ-restricted and dependent on antigen presenting cells (APC); most TCC were activated with DM-NAP-pulsed APC, while fixation of APC blocked the T-cell response. Cross-reactivity was not observed with structurally-related drugs.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm hepatic T-cell infiltrations in NSAID-induced DILI, and show a T-cell memory response toward DM-NAP indicating an immune-mediated basis for the adverse event. Whilst bioactivation at the carboxylate group is widely hypothesized to be pathogenic for NSAID associated DILI, we found no evidence of this with NAP.

Burden of grade 3 or 4 liver injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is concern about the burden of liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the likelihood of grade 3/4 liver injury, of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, and of liver failure, as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5, following treatment with ICIs. We compared these occurrences with a group of cancer patients who were propensity-matched and treated with conventional chemotherapy. For all ICI patients experiencing grade 3/4 liver injury, we conducted a causality assessment using the RUCAM method and examined patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 952 patients (median [IQR] age 66 [57-73] years, 64% males) who were treated with ICI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, a total of 86 (9%) progressed to grade 3/4 liver injury, and liver failure was not observed. Anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies combinations (adjusted hazard ratio 3.36 [95% CI: 1.67-6.79]; p <0.001), and chronic hepatitis B (adjusted hazard ratio 5.48 [95% CI: 1.62-18.5]; p = 0.006], were independent risk factors. Liver injury was attributed to ICI treatment in 19 (2.0%) patients. Patients with ICI toxicity typically presented with granulomatous hepatitis or cholangiocyte inflammation. ICI withdrawal was associated with cancer progression and mortality. Re-introduction of ICI was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury. Compared with matched patients treated with conventional, non-ICI-based chemotherapy, anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations (p <0.001) and anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapies (p = 0.053) increased the risk of grade 3/4 liver injury and of grade 3/4 cholestatic liver injury, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased risk of grade 3/4 liver injury under anti-PD-(L)1/anti-CTLA-4 antibodies was observed, whereas no substantial increase in the likelihood of liver failure occurred even after treatment reintroduction.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

There is concern about liver injury in patients with cancer exposed to immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs). We investigated the burden of grade 3/4 liver injury after treatment with ICIs in a multicentric cohort of patients with cancer. Overall, a 9% incidence of grade 3/4 liver injury was detected after ICIs, and direct ICI hepatotoxicity was demonstrated in 2% of patients. Anti-PD-(L)1/Anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations, and chronic HBV infection were independent risk factors. ICI withdrawal for grade 3/4 liver injury was associated with cancer progression. Re-introduction of ICI treatment was not associated with recurrent grade 3/4 liver injury.

Drug-induced liver injury and COVID-19: Use of artificial intelligence and the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Liver injury is a relevant condition in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) inpatients. Pathophysiology varies from direct infection by virus, systemic inflammation or drug-induced adverse reaction (DILI). DILI detection and monitoring is clinically relevant, as it may contribute to poor prognosis, prolonged hospitalization and increase indirect healthcare costs. Artificial Intelligence (AI) applied in data mining of electronic medical records combining abnormal liver tests, keyword searching tools, and risk factors analysis is a relevant opportunity for early DILI detection by automated algorithms.

AIM

To describe DILI cases in COVID-19 inpatients detected from data mining in electronic medical records (EMR) using AI and the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM).

METHODS

The study was conducted in March 2021 in a hospital in southern Brazil. The NoHarm^© system uses AI to support decision making in clinical pharmacy. Hospital admissions were 100523 during this period, of which 478 met the inclusion criteria. From these, 290 inpatients were excluded due to alternative causes of liver injury and/or due to not having COVID-19. We manually reviewed the EMR of 188 patients for DILI investigation. Absence of clinical information excluded most eligible patients. The DILI assessment causality was possible via the updated RUCAM in 17 patients.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 53 years (SD ± 18.37; range 22-83), most were male (70%), and admitted to the non-intensive care unit sector (65%). Liver injury pattern was mainly mixed, mean time to normalization of liver markers was 10 d, and mean length of hospitalization was 20.5 d (SD ± 16; range 7-70). Almost all patients recovered from DILI and one patient died of multiple organ failure. There were 31 suspected drugs with the following RUCAM score: Possible (n = 24), probable (n = 5), and unlikely (n = 2). DILI agents in our study were ivermectin, bicalutamide, linezolid, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanate, tocilizumab, piperacillin-tazobactam, and albendazole. Lack of essential clinical information excluded most patients. Although rare, DILI is a relevant clinical condition in COVID-19 patients and may contribute to poor prognostics.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of DILI in COVID-19 inpatients is rare and the absence of relevant clinical information on EMR may underestimate DILI rates. Prospects involve creation and validation of alerts for risk factors in all DILI patients based on RUCAM assessment causality, alterations of liver biomarkers and AI and machine learning.

Liquiritigenin Confers Liver Protection by Enhancing NRF2 Signaling through Both Canonical and Non-canonical Signaling Pathways

Oxidative stress plays a critical role in drug-induced liver injury. In recent years, liquiritigenin (LQ), a natural flavonoid distributed in Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma (Gan Cao), shows protective effects against oxidative hepatotoxicity. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we mainly investigated the role of NRF2, a core transcription factor in oxidative stress, in LQ-induced hepatoprotection. Our results indicated that the function of LQ to eliminate reactive oxygen species in liver cells was dependent on NRF2 activation. Both a canonical signaling pathway and a non-canonical signaling pathway are involved in LQ-induced NRF2 activation. LQ induced NRF2 activation in a KEAP1-C151-dependent manner partially. Meanwhile, LQ led to the blockage of autophagic flux and upregulation of p62, which competitively bound with KEAP1 and conferred NRF2 activation in a KEAP1-C151-independent manner. Totally, our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism underlying the hepatoprotection of LQ, providing a new insight into the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategy of oxidative liver injury.

Sacubitril/valsartan-induced liver injury: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) is the first drug approved for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in adult patients. There have been no reports of hepatotoxicity secondary to sacubitril/valsartan administration. Here, we report the first case of severe liver injury caused by sacubitril/valsartan.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 90-year-old female patient taking sacubitril/valsartan was admitted due to chronic heart failure. Subsequently, the patient developed serious liver injury with increased hepatic transaminases.

DIAGNOSIS

Drug-induced liver injury, sacubitril/valsartan-related. No liver injury caused by other reasons was observed after thorough examination. After the withdrawal of sacubitril/valsartan, the liver function of the patient gradually returned to normal.

INTERVENTIONS

We chose general liver protection methods to improve her hepatic function, including magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate at 100 mg daily and polyene phosphatidylcholine capsules at 456 mg 3 times daily. We consulted with a hepatologist to discuss the best plan for her treatment. The last, we stopped sacubitril/valsartan.

OUTCOMES

After the withdrawal of sacubitril/valsartan, the liver function of the patient gradually returned to normal.

LESSONS

Sacubitril/valsartan-induced liver injury is very rare. Clinicians should pay particular attention to the possibility of hepatotoxicity during sacubitril/valsartan treatment.

Advances in Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Issues: New Clinical and Mechanistic Analysis Due to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method Use

Clinical and mechanistic considerations in idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) remain challenging topics when they are derived from mere case narratives or iDILI cases without valid diagnosis. To overcome these issues, attempts should be made on pathogenetic aspects based on published clinical iDILI cases firmly diagnosed by the original RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) or the RUCAM version updated in 2016. Analysis of RUCAM-based iDILI cases allowed for evaluating immune and genetic data obtained from the serum and the liver of affected patients. For instance, strong evidence for immune reactions in the liver of patients with RUCAM-based iDILI was provided by the detection of serum anti-CYP 2E1 due to drugs like volatile anesthetics sevoflurane and desflurane, partially associated with the formation of trifluoroacetyl (TFA) halide as toxic intermediates that form protein adducts and may generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). This is accompanied by production of anti-TFA antibodies detected in the serum of these patients. Other RUCAM-based studies on serum ANA (anti-nuclear antibodies) and SMA (anti-smooth muscle antibodies) associated with AIDILI (autoimmune DILI) syn DIAIH (drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis) provide additional evidence of immunological reactions with monocytes as one of several promoting immune cells. In addition, in the blood plasma of patients, mediators like the cytokines IL-22, IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP), IL-6, IL-10, IL 12p70, IL-17A, IL-23, IP-10, or chemokines such as CD206 and sCD163 were found in DILI due to anti-tuberculosis drugs as ascertained by the prospective updated RUCAM, which scored a high causality. RUCAM-based analysis also provided compelling evidence of genetic factors such as HLA (human leucocyte antigen) alleles contributing to initiate iDILI by a few drugs. In conclusion, analysis of published RUCAM-based iDILI cases provided firm evidence of immune and genetic processes involved in iDILI caused by specific drugs.

Analysis of medical malpractice liability disputes related to novel antineoplastic drugs and research on risk prevention and control strategies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the general characteristics of litigation cases of medical malpractice liability disputes (MMLDs) related to novel antineoplastic drugs (NADs), the drugs involved, as well as the common types of medical errors related to NADs and their damages in the process of diagnosis and treatment, with the aims of improving the level of rational medication use in the clinical application of NADs and actively prevent medical disputes.

METHODS

The China Judgments Online was searched for the cause of action using the key word "MMLDs" along with the name of 77 kinds of NADs. A total of 39 NAD litigation cases meeting the inclusion criteria from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2021 were analyzed, and each potential adverse drug reaction (ADR) was reviewed to determine a causality assessment using the Naranjo algorithm for non-drug-induced liver injury (DILI) cases and the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) for the DILI cases. Risk prevention and control strategies were recommended.

RESULTS

Cases that met the inclusion criteria increased substantially each year during the last six years, from three cases in 2009-2015 to 36 cases in 2016-2021. There were more cases in Eastern China than in other geographic regions. Most cases involved tertiary hospitals, patients between 25 and 60 years of age, and patients who were predominately male. There were 18 kinds of NADs involved in medical errors. The most common consequences of NADs were closely related to the death, disability, and increased treatment costs caused by ADRs, inadequate indications, delayed diagnosis and treatment, and misdiagnosis and mistreatment. The most frequent medical errors were medical technology errors, medical ethics errors and medical record writing/safekeeping errors. In two cases involving DILI, one case was unable to undergo further RUCAM scoring because the liver function indicators of the patient before and after treatment were not published.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of mechanisms to reduce the risks associated with the clinical application of NADs is warranted. Healthcare services must maintain strict adherence to the specific requirements of GPCANADs and drug instructions and strictly grasp the indications, contraindications, usage, and dosage of drugs, and strengthen the notification and management of off-label drug use. Monitoring patients for ADRs and preparing rescue and treatment measures for high-risk drugs may serve to reduce damages related to NADs. For DILI cases, medical and appraisal institutions should use RUCAM score to assess causal relationships.

Acute Hepatitis E Infection during Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Acute hepatitis E, one of the causes of acute liver injury, has been increasingly diagnosed in developed countries in recent years. Misdiagnosis of acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection as drug-induced liver injury (DILI) may lead to discontinuation of effective chemotherapy. Thus, viral hepatitis, including hepatitis E, must be ruled out in the diagnosis of DILI. A 78-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma and multiple bone metastases received maintenance therapy with pemetrexed + pembrolizumab for a year. Increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, indicating acute liver injury, were observed. Initially, DILI was suspected, and she was given medications to lower the levels of hepatic enzymes. She was later admitted to the hospital with the chief complaint of general malaise and anorexia. Serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were markedly elevated (381 and 854 U/L, respectively). Acute HEV infection was diagnosed based on the detection of serum HEV immunoglobulin A antibodies. The patient received liver support therapy, and the serum hepatic enzymes recovered to normal levels. Chemotherapy was resumed without any subsequent relapse of hepatic enzyme elevation. When DILI is suspected during chemotherapy, exclusion of viral hepatitis is mandatory, which can be achieved by measuring markers of hepatitis viruses, including HEV, and examining the patient's detailed medical history.

Molecular Idiosyncratic Toxicology of Drugs in the Human Liver Compared with Animals: Basic Considerations

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) occurs in patients exposed to drugs at recommended doses that leads to idiosyncratic DILI and provides an excellent human model with well described clinical features, liver injury pattern, and diagnostic criteria, based on patients assessed for causality using RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) as original method of 1993 or its update of 2016. Overall, 81,856 RUCAM based DILI cases have been published until mid of 2020, allowing now for an analysis of mechanistic issues of the disease. From selected DILI cases with verified diagnosis by using RUCAM, direct evidence was provided for the involvement of the innate and adapted immune system as well as genetic HLA (Human Leucocyte Antigen) genotypes. Direct evidence for a role of hepatic immune systems was substantiated by (1) the detection of anti-CYP (Cytochrome P450) isoforms in the plasma of affected patients, in line with the observation that 65% of the drugs most implicated in DILI are metabolized by a range of CYP isoforms, (2) the DIAIH (drug induced autoimmune hepatitis), a subgroup of idiosyncratic DILI, which is characterized by high RUCAM causality gradings and the detection of plasma antibodies such as positive serum anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA), rarely also anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), (3) the effective treatment with glucocorticoids in part of an unselected RUCAM based DILI group, and (4) its rare association with the immune-triggered Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) caused by a small group of drugs. Direct evidence of a genetic basis of idiosyncratic DILI was shown by the association of several HLA genotypes for DILI caused by selected drugs. Finally, animal models of idiosyncratic DILI mimicking human immune and genetic features are not available and further search likely will be unsuccessful. In essence and based on cases of DILI with verified diagnosis using RUCAM for causality evaluation, there is now substantial direct evidence that immune mechanisms and genetics can account for idiosyncratic DILI by many but not all implicated drugs, which may help understand the mechanistic background of the disease and contribute to new approaches of therapy and prevention.

Turmeric-Associated Liver Injury: A Rare Case of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Turmeric is popularly used as a naturopathic supplement associated with myriad benefits and has long been generally regarded as safe. However, increasing reports of turmeric-associated liver injury have emerged over recent years. This case presents a female patient without significant past medical history who presents with signs and symptoms of acute hepatitis after consuming a turmeric-containing tea. Her case adds to a growing body of evidence that dosage safety, manufacturing, and pharmacologic delivery practices for turmeric supplements should be investigated.

The Current status of steroid-refractory immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-related hepatotoxicity

ICI-related hepatotoxicity (IRH) is becoming more and more common as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have begun to be increasingly approved and used in combination with other anti-tumor drugs worldwide. Steroids are the first choice for the treatment of IRH, but the subsequent optimal treatment algorithm remains unclear if the disease progresses to steroid-refractory IRH. Therefore, in this paper we reviewed all the pertinent literature on steroid-refractory IRH to the greatest extent possible in an attempt to provide information on which to base an update of the treatment algorithm for steroid-refractory IRH.

Drug-induced liver injury: Relation between the R ratio and histopathology

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a diagnosis based on the ruling out of potential liver diseases and consolidated by establishing causality through the temporal relation between a potentially hepatotoxic substance and altered liver biochemistry. Incidence fluctuates greatly worldwide, with very few reports of causal agents of DILI in Colombia. A retrospective study on patients treated at the Centro de Estudios en Salud (CES), within the time frame of January 2015 and June 2020, was conducted to document the causal substances of DILI in patients with liver biopsy and to correlate the types of histologic patterns with the biochemical pattern of liver injury (R ratio).

RESULTS

Of the 254 adult patients with liver biopsy and no tumor etiology, 20 patients were identified as cases of DILI (7.87%). The two most frequently found causal substances were efavirenz, in three HIV-positive patients, and Moringa oleifera (moringa), in two patients. There was a statistically significant association between cholestatic patterns (p = 0.037) and mixed patterns (p = 0.031), in the comparison of the histopathologic categories and the R ratio.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on DILI secondary to Moringa oleifera (moringa). The R ratio could be a useful tool, in relation to the histologic pattern of injury, in cases of mixed and cholestatic patterns.

Treatment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Current pharmacotherapy options of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain under discussion and are now evaluated in this analysis. Needless to say, the use of the offending drug must be stopped as soon as DILI is suspected. Normal dosed drugs may cause idiosyncratic DILI, and drugs taken in overdose commonly lead to intrinsic DILI. Empirically used but not substantiated regarding efficiency by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is the intravenous antidote treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with intrinsic DILI by N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) overdose. Good data recommending pharmacotherapy in idiosyncratic DILI caused by hundreds of different drugs are lacking. Indeed, a recent analysis revealed that just eight RCTs have been published, and in only two out of eight trials were DILI cases evaluated for causality by the worldwide used Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), representing overall a significant methodology flaw, as results of DILI RCTs lacking RUCAM are misleading since many DILI cases are known to be attributable erroneously to nondrug alternative causes. In line with these major shortcomings and mostly based on anecdotal reports, glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immuno-suppressants may be given empirically in carefully selected patients with idiosyncratic DILI exhibiting autoimmune features or caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while some patients with cholestatic DILI may benefit from ursodeoxycholic acid use; in other patients with drug-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) and coagulopathy risks, the indication for anticoagulants should be considered. In view of many other mechanistic factors such as the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 with a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ferroptosis with toxicity of intracellular iron, and modification of the gut microbiome, additional therapy options may be available in the future. In summation, stopping the offending drug is still the first line of therapy for most instances of acute DILI, while various therapies are applied empirically and not based on good data from RCTs awaiting further trials using the updated RUCAM that asks for strict exclusion and inclusion details like liver injury criteria and provides valid causality rankings of probable and highly probable grades.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury caused by givosiran in a patient with acute intermittent porphyria

A 39-year-old woman with biochemically and clinically active acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) developed moderately severe liver injury after receiving her second dose of givosiran. Serologic evaluation ruled out hepatitis caused by viral, autoimmune, or other metabolic etiologies. The updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score was 8 and the Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method (RECAM) score for givosiran was 9. Results of liver tests returned to normal after givosiran was discontinued, and she has not received any more givosiran.

Vaccine-Related Autoimmune Hepatitis: Emerging Association with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Coincidence?

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing number of liver injury cases resembling autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, an association has not yet been established.

METHODS/MATERIALS

A literature review was performed to identify articles regarding the association of AIH with vaccination, emphasizing on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and the proposed mechanisms. We then performed a literature search for AIH-like cases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and we evaluated the included cases for AIH diagnosis using simplified diagnostic criteria (SDC), and for vaccination causality using the Naranjo score for adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

We identified 51 AIH-like cases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Forty cases (80%) were characterized as "probable", "at least probable", or "definite" for AIH diagnosis according to SDC. Forty cases (78.4%) were characterized as "probable", four (7.8%) as "possible", and three (5.8%) as "definite" for vaccine-related AIH according to the Naranjo score.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related AIH carries several phenotypes and, although most cases resolve, immunosuppressive therapy seems to be necessary. Early diagnosis is mandatory and should be considered in any patient with acute or chronic hepatitis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially in those with pre-existing liver disease.

Spectrum of drug-induced liver injury in a tertiary hospital in southern India

Background

Anti-tuberculosis drugs are thought to account for about 50% of drugs that cause liver injury in India. We show that the spectrum of drugs is much wider than previously reported.

Methods

We evaluated all patients with unexplained acute liver injury presenting during 2006–2016 using a structured proforma for drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method was used to assess causality.

Results

DILI was found in 143 of 2534 patients with acute liver injury. Nineteen patients had probable ayurvedic DILI. The other common causes of DILI were statins (16 patients) and anti-tuberculosis drugs (11 patients). Eight patients had DILI post-liver transplant. Fluconazole was the most common cause of post-liver transplant DILI. Chronic DILI (abnormal liver function test after 12 months of stopping the suspected drug) was found in 2 patients.

Conclusion

In otherwise unexplained acute liver injury, DILI due to ayurvedic drugs should be sought. DILI should be considered in post-liver transplant patients. Patients with DILI should be monitored for at least 12 months to exclude progression to chronic DILI.

Drug-induced Liver Injury in Pediatrics

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare, underdiagnosed cause of liver disease in children. The incidence of DILI in the pediatric population is unknown but it represents around 10% of all DILI cases. The most common hepatotoxic drugs in children are antibiotics and antiepileptics. DILI is classified as intrinsic or idiosyncratic and it presents mostly with 2 patterns of injury: hepatocellular or cholestatic. Diagnosis can be done with help of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) casualty assessment. The mainstay of treatment is prompt withdrawal of the suspect drug.

The determination of causality of drug induced liver injury in patients with COVID-19 clinical syndrome

Background

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is a rising morbidity amongst patients with COVID-19 clinical syndrome. The updated RUCAM causality assessment scale is validated for use in the general population, but its utility for causality determination in cohorts of patients with COVID-19 and DILI remains uncertain.

Methods

This retrospective study was comprised of COVID-19 patients presenting with suspected DILI to the emergency department of Weill Cornell medicine-affiliated Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar. All cases that met the inclusion criteria were comparatively adjudicated by two independent rating pairs (2 clinical pharmacist and 2 physicians) utilizing the updated RUCAM scale to assess the likelihood of DILI.

Results

A total of 72 patients (mean age 48.96 (SD ± 10.21) years) were examined for the determination of DILI causality. The majority had probability likelihood of “possible” or “probable” by the updated RUCAM scale. Azithromycin was the most commonly reported drug as a cause of DILI. The median R-ratio was 4.74 which correspond to a mixed liver injury phenotype. The overall Krippendorf’s kappa was 0.52; with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.79 (IQR 0.72–0.85). The proportion of exact pairwise agreement and disagreement between the rating pairs were 64.4%, kappa 0.269 (ICC 0.28 [0.18, 0.40]) and kappa 0.45 (ICC 0.43 [0.29–0.57]), respectively.

Conclusion

In a cohort of patients with COVID-19 clinical syndrome, we found the updated RUCAM scale to be useful in establishing “possible” or “probable” DILI likelihood as evident by the respective kappa values; this results if validated by larger sample sized studies will extend the clinical application of this universal tool for adjudication of DILI.

Case report: Kinetics of human leukocyte antigen receptor HLA-DR during liver injury induced by potassium para-aminobenzoate as assessed for causality using the updated RUCAM

Potassium para-aminobenzoate (POTABA) is used to treat Peyronie’s disease by decreasing fibrosis and plaque size progression. Among potential side effects, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) attributed to POTABA administration has been reported in a few cases and inferred to immune hypersensitivity. In the present case, we investigated clinical, biochemical, and serological features as well as searched for non-drug-related causes, and applied the updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) confirming a highly probable causality of POTABA-induced liver injury. Moreover, we here observed specific activated CD3+ T lymphocytes during the acute phase of liver injury by monitoring of human leukocyte antigen receptor (HLA-DR) expression. Furthermore, improvement of biochemical markers of liver injury after POTABA withdrawal was associated with a rapid decline of CD3+ HLA-DR+ immune cells. In contrast, CD14+ monocytes expressing HLA-DR remained stable during recovery from liver injury. These observations implicate a specific involvement of activated T lymphocytes in liver injury mediated by POTABA. Clinicians should be aware of POTABA-induced liver injury, and measurement of activated immune cells by assessment of HLA-DR could provide pathomechanistic insights enabling biomonitoring of recovery from DILI.

Clinical Significance of Transient Asymptomatic Elevations in Aminotransferase (TAEAT) in Oncology

Monitoring for liver injury remains an important aspect of drug safety assessment, including for oncotherapeutics. When present, drug-induced liver injury may limit the use or result in the discontinuation of these agents. Drug-induced liver injury can exhibit with a wide spectrum of clinical and biochemical manifestations, ranging from transient asymptomatic elevations in aminotransferases (TAEAT) to acute liver failure. Numerous oncotherapeutics have been associated with TAEAT, with published reports indicating a phenomenon in which patients may be asymptomatic without overt liver injury despite the presence of grade ≥3 aminotransferase elevations. In this review, we discuss the occurrence of TAEAT in the context of oncology clinical trials and clinical practice, as well as the clinical relevance of this phenomenon as an adverse event in response to oncotherapeutics and the related cellular and molecular mechanisms that may underlie its occurrence. We also identify several gaps in knowledge relevant to the diagnosis and the management of TAEAT in patients receiving oncotherapeutics, and identify areas warranting further study to enable the future development of consensus guidelines to support clinical decision-making.

Efficacy and safety of bicyclol for treating patients with idiosyncratic acute drug-induced liver injury: A multicenter, randomized, phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evidence for using bicyclol in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of bicyclol in acute DILI.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-controlled, superiority and phase II trial. Patients with idiosyncratic acute DILI were randomized 1: 1:1 to low-dose bicyclol (25 mg times a day [TID]), high-dose bicyclol (50 mg TID) and polyene phosphatidylcholine (control) groups. The primary endpoint was the decrease from baseline in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at post-treatment for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, 241 patients were included in the full analysis set, with 81, 82 and 78 patients in the low-dose bicyclol, high-dose bicyclol, and control groups respectively. ALT levels decreased across groups (-249.2 ± 151.1, -273.6 ± 203.1, and -180.8 ± 218.2 U/L in the low-dose bicyclol, high-dose bicyclol and control groups, respectively; both p < .001, the bicyclol-dependent groups vs. control group). The ALT normalization rates at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 were higher in the bicyclol-dependent groups than in the control group (p = .002 at week 1 and all p < .001 at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8 respectively). The median times to ALT normalization in the low-dose bicyclol, high-dose bicyclol and control groups were 29, 16 and 43 days respectively. Adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse drug reactions were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bicyclol (25 and 50 mg TID) appeared efficacious and safe for treating idiosyncratic acute DILI, while bicyclol 50 mg TID showed higher efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (registration no. NCT02944552).

Osimertinib-related liver injury with successful osimertinib rechallenge: A case report

Osimertinib is approved as the first‐line treatment for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation and for patients who develop EGFR T790M mutation during EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and disease progression. Asymptomatic elevation of aminotransferase levels is commonly observed during TKI treatment; however, significant hepatotoxicity is infrequent. Here, we report a patient with osimertinib‐related drug‐induced liver injury who was successfully managed with osimertinib rechallenge.

Hepatotoxicity Induced by Biological Agents: Clinical Features and Current Controversies

Novel biological agents including cytokines and recombinant fusion proteins are increasingly prescribed for cancer, rheumatologic, autoimmune, and inflammatory diseases, and are currently being evaluated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). They are classified by their mechanism of action and include tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) antagonists, T cell mediated antitumor inhibitors, interleukin receptor antagonists, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Some ICIs cause frequent hepatotoxicity with a variable clinical, biochemical, and serological presentation, especially in patients receiving another immunomodulatory agent. Half of the cases of liver damage induced by biological agents spontaneously regress after drug withdrawal, but the others require steroid therapy. Unfortunately, there are no widely accepted recommendation for the use of corticosteroids in these patients, even though international cancer societies have their own guidelines. Differentiating drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) from classic AIH is challenging for pathologists, but liver biopsy is valuable, particularly in cases with unclear clinical presentation. Interesting, novel histological patterns have been described in liver damage induced by these agents (i.e., endothelitis, ring granuloma and secundary sclerosing cholangitis associated with lymphocytic infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+T cells). Here, we describe the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with hepatotoxicity induced by TNF-α antagonists and ICIs. Controversial issues involved in the administration of corticosteroid therapy, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation induced by immunosuppressive therapy are also discussed.

Combination of Vitamin C and Curcumin Safeguards Against Methotrexate-Induced Acute Liver Injury in Mice by Synergistic Antioxidant Effects

Methotrexate (MTX), an antineoplastic and immunosuppressive drug, widely used in the treatment of different types of cancers and the management of chronic inflammatory diseases. However, its use is associated with hepatotoxicity. Vitamin C (VC) and curcumin (CUR) exhibit anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Thus, we aimed to investigate the potential hepatoprotective effects of VC and CUR pretreatment alone and in combination against MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. Albino mice were randomly divided into 7 groups: the control group, which received only normal saline; MTX group; VC group, pretreated with VC (100 or 200 mg/kg/day orally) for 10 days; CUR group, pretreated with CUR (10 or 20 mg/kg/day orally); and combination group, which received VC (100 mg/kg) and CUR (10 mg/kg). MTX was administered (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) to all the groups on the tenth day to induce hepatotoxicity. Forty eight hours after MTX administration, the mice were anesthetized. Blood samples were collected, the liver was removed for biochemical analysis, and a part of the tissue was preserved in formalin for histopathological analysis. The results indicated that pretreatment with a combination of VC and CUR induced a more significant decrease in the serum levels of alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and lactic dehydrogenase and a significant increase in the tissue level of superoxide dismutase and glutathione; furthermore, it induced a significant decrease in malondialdehyde levels and improvement in histopathological changes in the liver tissues, confirming the potential hepatoprotective effects of the combination therapy on MTX-induced liver injury. To conclude, MTX-induced hepatotoxicity is mediated by induction of oxidative stress as evident by increased lipid peroxidation and reduction of antioxidant enzyme activity. Pretreatment with VC, CUR or their combination reduces the MTX-induced hepatotoxicity by antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. However, the combined effect of VC and CUR provided a synergistic hepatoprotective effect that surpasses pretreatment with CUR alone but seems to be similar to that of VC 200 mg/kg/day. Therefore, VC and CUR combination or a large dose of VC could be effective against MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. In this regard, further studies are warranted to confirm the combined hepatoprotective effect of VC and CUR against MTX-induced hepatotoxicity.

A case report of drug-induced liver injury after tigecycline administration: histopathological evidence and a probable causality grading as assessed by the updated RUCAM diagnostic scale

BACKGROUND

There have been no reports of tigecycline-associated drug-related liver injury (DILI) identified by histopathological assistance and causal assessment method. We reported the histopathological manifestations for the first time and described tigecycline-associated liver injury's pattern, severity, duration, and outcome.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 68-year-old male with post-liver transplantation was given high-dose tigecycline intravenously (loading dose 200 mg, followed by 100 mg every 12 h) combined with polymyxin B (50,000 units by aerosol inhalation every 12 h) for hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. At the same time, tacrolimus was discontinued. Liver function was initially normal but started to decline on day 4 of tigecycline. Reducing the dose of tigecycline and resuming tacrolimus could not reverse the deterioration. Therefore, a liver puncture biopsy was performed for further diagnosis, with histopathological findings being cytotoxic injury. The updated RUCAM scale was used to evaluate the causal relationship between tigecycline and liver injury, with the result of 7 points indicating a "probable" causality grading. Methylprednisolone was initiated to treat DILI that was determined to be Grade 1 cholestatic injury. Total bilirubin and transaminase levels returned to normal on day 4 and 11 after tigecycline withdrawal, respectively. Monthly outpatient follow-up showed that the patient's liver function stayed normal.

CONCLUSIONS

This case possessed a significant reference value for differential diagnosis and treatment prognosis of tigecycline-associated DILI. With early diagnosis and timely management, the tigecycline-associated DILI of this patient was successfully reversed.

Causality imputation between herbal products and HILI: An algorithm evaluation in a systematic review

Algorithms can have several purposes in the clinical practice. There are different scales for causality imputation in DILI (Drug-Induced Liver Injury), but the applicability and validity of these for the HILI (Herb-Induced Liver Injury) evaluation is questionable for some scales. The purpose of the study was to determine the clinical and demographic profile of the patients with HILI, and the main algorithmic scales used in its causality assessment. The methodology was a systematic review of articles in English, Spanish, or Portuguese language, from 1979 to 2019, involving humans, with descriptors related to HILI. Qualitative and quantitative statistical analysis were performed. As a result, from a total of 60 articles, 203 HILI reports were selected: 59.9% were women, similar with other studies, and the average age was 45.8 years. Jaundice was the most frequent symptom and regarding the type of lesion, the hepatocellular was the most frequent. In regard to HILI severity, 3.0% were severe and 7.6% were fatal or required liver transplantation. In 72.3% of the cases, the most used algorithm was RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method). The conclusion of the study is that RUCAM was the most used algorithm for causality assessment in HILI. The patients were predominantly female, jaundice was the main symptom, and HILI is reversible in the majority of cases.

Utility of Lymphocyte Transformation Test for Assisting Updated Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method in Drug-Induced Liver Injury: A Case-Control Study

Background: The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) is a validated tool for assessing causality in cases of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI). However, RUCAM cannot discriminate between concomitant hepatotoxic drugs with the same temporal sequence.

Objective: To analyse the utility of the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) for assisting updated RUCAM in 45 patients and 40 controls with a clinical diagnosis of DILI.

Methods: Suspected DILI cases were detected through the Prospective Pharmacovigilance Program from Laboratory Signals in Hospital (PPLSH) or by consultations. The controls completed the drug therapy with no adverse reactions during the study period. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the optimal cut-off value for the stimulation index (SI), corresponding to the largest sum for the specificity and sensitivity values of LTT for true DILI cases.

Results: Out of 45 patients diagnosed with DILI, 42 cases were detected by the PPLSH, two cases by consultation and one case by both methods. Most DILI cases (64.4%) arose during hospitalization. According to the biochemical parameters, 24 cases (53.3%) had the hepatocellular phenotype, 14 (31.1%) had the cholestatic phenotype, and 7 cases (15.6%) had the mixed phenotype. Considering the severity criteria, 7 (15.5%) cases were classified as moderate DILI, and 4 (8.9%) were severe DILI; there were no fatal cases. A total of 149 drugs (median/case, 3; IQR, 2–5) were suspected to be involved in the DILI cases (RUCAM score ≥3). In 8 cases, only one drug was suspected, and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) was identified in 29% of the cases. Of all DILI cases, 46 (30.9%) of the 149 suspected drugs produced positive LTT results, and the LTT was positive in 34 (75.5%) of the 45 patients. No exposed controls produced positive LTT results. The optimal cut-off of 1.95 for the SI was obtained with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 100% (area under the curve, 0.91; 95% asymptotic confidence interval 0.84–0.97; p < 0.001). The sensitivity of the hepatocellular phenotype was 92%.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that LTT is an add on strengthening causality in cases of suspected idiosyncratic DILI, especially for patients with several suspected drugs and a hepatocellular phenotype.

Drug-induced bile duct injury: new agents, new mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Drug-induced bile duct injury can be caused by a long list of agents. In most cases, damage is because of T-cell-mediated idiosyncratic reactions. Recently, a number of new agents, including not only drugs but also herbal supplements, have been incriminated and new mechanisms of bile duct injury have emerged. This review will focus on these new data.

RECENT FINDINGS

New members of drug families already known to be responsible for bile duct injury have been incriminated. New players have been identified, such as herbal supplements, like kratom, and recreational drugs, such as ketamine used outside the medical setting. Anticytokine monoclonal antibodies are rarely involved. In contrast, antineoplastic treatments are of growing concern, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, which induce immune-related adverse effects because of the excessive stimulation of the immune system and its lack of regulation.

SUMMARY

Two patterns of bile duct injury are recognized. Drug-induced small-duct cholangiopathies target the smaller bile ducts; acute injuries eventually progress to chronic disease in the form of the vanishing bile duct syndrome. Drug-induced sclerosing cholangitis target large bile ducts, with a protracted chronic course; the onset of symptoms may be delayed after drug discontinuation; potentially severe, life-threatening complications can occur.

Severe tyrosine-kinase inhibitor induced liver injury in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: two case reports assessed for causality using the updated RUCAM and review of the literature

Background

Sunitinib and pazopanib are both oral small molecule multityrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKI) used in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Hepatotoxicity or “liver injury” is the most important adverse effect of pazopanib administration, but little is known about the underlying mechanism. Liver injury may also occur in patients treated with sunitinib, but severe toxicity is extremely rare. Herein we report two new cases of severe liver injury induced by MTKI. Both cases are unique and exceptional. We assessed both cases for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) using the updated score Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method (RUCAM). The literature on potential pathogenic mechanisms and precautionary measures is reviewed.

Case presentation

A case of a metastatic RCC (mRCC) patient treated with pazopanib who had manifestation of severe liver injury is presented. These manifestations consisted of grade 4 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase and grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia. Alternate causes of acute or chronic liver disease were excluded. The patient gradually recovered from the liver injury and refused any further therapy for mRCC. The patient was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) two years later and eventually succumbed to the disease. The second case describes a mRCC patient treated with sunitinib for 3,5 years and fatal liver failure after 2 weeks of clarithromycin co-medication for acute bronchitis.

Conclusions

Liver injury has been commonly observed in TKI-treated patients with unpredictable course. Management requires regular routine liver enzyme-monitoring and the collaboration of medical oncologist and hepatologist. There is an unmet medical need for a risk stratification and definition of predictive biomarkers to identify potential genetic polymorphisms or other factors associated with TKI-induced liver injury. Any potential unrecommended concomitant therapy has to be avoided.

Drug-induced liver injury: A management position paper from the Latin American Association for Study of the liver

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) caused by xenobiotics (drugs, herbals and dietary supplements) is an uncommon cause of liver disease presenting with a wide range of phenotypes and disease severity, acute hepatitis mimicking viral hepatitis to autoimmune hepatitis, steatosis, fibrosis or rare chronic vascular syndromes. Disease severity ranges from asymptomatic liver test abnormalities to acute liver failure. DILI has been traditionally classified in predictable or intrinsic (dose-related) or unpredictable (not dose-related) mechanisms. Few prospective studies are assessing the real prevalence and incidence of hepatotoxicity in the general population. DILI registries represent useful networks used for the study of liver toxicity, aimed at improving the understanding of causes, phenotypes, natural history, and standardized definitions of hepatotoxicity. Although most of the registries do not carry out population-based studies, they may provide important data related to the prevalence of DILI, and also may be useful to compare features from different countries. With the support of the Spanish Registry of Hepatotoxicity, our Latin American Registry (LATINDILI) was created in 2011, and more than 350 DILI patients have been recruited to date. This position paper describes the more frequent drugs and herbs-induced DILI in Latin America, mainly focusing on several features of responsible medicaments. Also, we highlighted the most critical points on the management of hepatotoxicity in general and those based on findings from our Latin American experience in particular.

Herb-Induced Liver Injury—A Challenging Diagnosis

Herb-induced liver injury (HILI) can be caused by supplements containing herbs, natural products, and products used in traditional medicine. Herbal products’ most common adverse reaction is hepatotoxicity. Almost every plant part can be used to make herbal products, and these products can come in many different forms, such as teas, powders, oils, creams, capsules, and injectables. HILI incidence and prevalence are hard to estimate and vary from study to study because of insufficient large-scale prospective studies. The diagnosis of HILI is a challenging process that requires not only insight but also a high degree of suspicion by the clinician. HILI presents with unspecific symptoms and is a diagnosis of exclusion. For diagnosis, it is necessary to make a causality assessment; the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences assessment is the preferred method worldwide. The most effective treatment is the suspension of the use of the suspected herbal product and close monitoring of liver function. The objective of this review is to highlight the necessary steps for the clinician to follow to reach a correct diagnosis of herb-induced liver injury. Further studies of HILI are needed to better understand its complexity and prevent increased morbidity and mortality.

Glutathione-S-transferase genetic polymorphism and risk of hepatotoxicity to antitubercular drugs in a North-African population: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

GST non-functional genotypes can lead to the accumulation of toxic intermediates, resulting in liver damage and increasing susceptibility to ATDH.

AIM

To investigate the impact of GST Mu (GSTM1), GST Theta (GSTT1) null genotypes, and GST Pi (GSTP1; adenosine (A) > guanine (G), rs1695) variant allele on the development of ATDH in Tunisian patients treated with anti-tuberculosis therapy.

METHODS

This was a case-control study including patients receiving anti-tuberculosis regimen. Cases (n = 23) were tuberculosis patients presenting ATDH during two months of anti-tuberculosis drug therapy. Controls (n = 30) were patients treated for tuberculosis, but presenting no ATDH. Genotyping was performed using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

No statistically significant association was observed between GSTM1 and GSTT1 homozygous null genotypes, and the risk of ATDH. A statistically significant association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 double null genotypes, and the risk of ATDH was found (p = 0.033) between cases and controls. For GSTP1, the distribution of GG homozygous mutant genotype was significantly associated with ATDH compared with the wild and the transition A to G (AA + AG) genotypes.

CONCLUSION

Double deletion of GSTM1 and GSTT1 may predispose to ATDH in a Tunisian population. Moreover, GSTP1 rs1695 (A > G) genotyping can predict susceptibility to developing ATDH.

[Literature review on pharmacovigilance of medicines derived from traditional pharmacopoeias. Part II: risks assessment and prevention]

After the initial stage of the pharmacovigilance process for medicines from traditional pharmacopoeias - which concerns the identification of the risks associated with their use - the risk assessment should now be approached. The latter makes it possible to detect potential signals early and to take preventive measures. We sought to understand, from a review of the literature, the steps and methods of risk assessment relating to traditional medicines, as well as the prevention strategies applied to them. All of the work carried out on the subject has shown that the steps and methods for assessing and preventing drug risks are the same for both conventional and traditional medicines. Risk assessment includes analysis of the quality of individual notifications, assessment of causality, detection and evaluation of signals. The World Health Organization method is the most widely used for causality assessment internationally, while disproportionality measures are the most applied for signal detection. Regarding prevention, risk communication is the main strategy for the risks associated with traditional medicines. This review suggests the involvement of traditional medicine practitioners both in the notification system and in the communication strategy on the risks associated with their products.

Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions in Paediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study in Turkish Hospital

Drug safety in paediatric patients is a serious public health concern around the world. The paediatric patients are more prone to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than adults. Moreover, there is a scarcity of information about ADRs in paediatric patients. This study was conducted to determine the frequency, causality, severity, preventability of paediatric patients’ ADRs reported in a tertiary care hospital in Adana, Turkey. A retrospective study was conducted on all spontaneously reported ADRs between January 01, 2020, to July 30, 2021, in paediatric patients. The ADRs reports were evaluated in terms of gender, age, ADR characteristics, suspected drugs and reporting source. All included ADRs reports were characterized according to the Naranjo Algorithm/World Health Organization (WHO) causality scales, Hartwig/Siegel and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) severity scales, the modified Schoumock and Thornton preventability scale and hospital pharmacovigilance center criteria for seriousness. Therapeutic groups were also coded using the WHO-Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification. During the study period, 8,912 paediatric patients who were admitted had 16 ADRs with 1.7 ADRs/1,000 admissions. The majority of ADRs were found in infants (31.2%) and children (56.2%) as compared to adolescents (12.5%). ADRs were observed more in females (81.2%) than males. Skin (62.5%) was the most affected organ due to the ADRs, and maculopapular rash and erythema multiforme were the most commonly reported symptoms. Most ADRs were probable/likely (93.7%), severe (50%), preventable or probably preventable (43.7%) and serious (37.5%). Antibiotics (93.7%) were found to be the most common cause of ADRs in paediatric patients. The majority of ADRs were associated with vancomycin (68.7%). Most of the ADRs were reported by a medical doctor in this study. This small sample size study highlights significant problems of ADRs in paediatric patients, mainly caused by antibiotics and with a majority of ADRs manifest as skin reactions. Furthermore, a high proportion of the identified ADRs were found to be preventable. More focused efforts are needed at the national level to avoid preventable ADRs in hospitals. Monitoring and management of ADRs and future studies would be beneficial for better patient care and safety.

Managing abnormal liver tests in children with inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver test abnormalities in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are usually insidious in onset. By the time that symptoms referable to liver disease have appeared, the liver injury may be well advanced. It is, therefore, important that children with an incidental finding of abnormal liver tests are investigated in an appropriate and timely manner.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most prevalent cause of liver test elevations in paediatric IBD is immune-related liver disease, including primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis. Although less common, drugs used in the treatment of IBD can also cause liver injury. The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury relies largely on excluding other causes of liver injury, such as viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and biliary and vascular complications.

SUMMARY

This review highlights an avenue to a step-wise approach for investigating children with IBD and silent liver test elevations. Central to the timing of diagnostic actions is grading the severity of liver test elevations.

The LiverTox Paradox-Gaps between Promised Data and Reality Check

The LiverTox database compiles cases of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) with the promised aims to help identify hepatotoxicants and provide evidence-based information on iDILI. Weaknesses of this approach include case selection merely based on published case number and not on a strong causality assessment method such as the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). The aim of this analysis was to find out whether the promised aims have been achieved by comparison of current iDILI case data with those promised in 2012 in LiverTox. First, the LiverTox criteria of likelihood categories applied to iDILI cases were analyzed regarding robustness. Second, the quality was analyzed in LiverTox cases caused by 46 selected drugs implicated in iDILI. LiverTox included iDILI cases of insufficient quality because most promised details were not fulfilled: (1) Standard liver injury definition; (2) incomplete narratives or inaccurate for alternative causes; and (3) not a single case was assessed for causality with RUCAM, as promised. Instead, causality was arbitrarily judged on the iDILI case number presented in published reports with the same drug. All of these issues characterize the paradox of LiverTox, requiring changes in the method to improve data quality and database reliability. In conclusion, establishing LiverTox is recognized as a valuable effort, but the paradox due to weaknesses between promised data quality and actual data must be settled by substantial improvements, including, for instance, clear definition and identification of iDILI cases after evaluation with RUCAM to establish a robust causality grading.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights and Controversies in the Recent Literature

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains an important, yet challenging diagnosis for physicians. Each year, additional drugs are implicated in DILI and this year was no different, with more than 1400 articles published on the subject. This review examines some of the most significant highlights and controversies in DILI-related research over the past year and their implications for clinical practice. Several new drugs were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration including a number of drugs implicated in causing DILI, particularly among the chemotherapeutic classes. The COVID-19 pandemic was also a major focus of attention in 2020 and we discuss some of the notable aspects of COVID-19-related liver injury and its implications for diagnosing DILI. Updates in diagnostic and causality assessments related to DILI such as the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method are included, mindful that there is still no single biomarker or diagnostic tool to unequivocally diagnose DILI. Glutamate dehydrogenase received renewed attention as being more specific than alanine aminotransferase. There were a few new reports of previously unrecognized hepatotoxins, including immune modulators and novel gene therapy drugs that we highlight. Updates and new developments of previously described hepatotoxins, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-tuberculosis drugs are reviewed. Finally, novel technologies such as organoid culture systems to better predict DILI preclinically may be coming of age and determinants of hepatocyte loss, such as calculating P_ALT are poised to improve our current means of estimating DILI severity and the risk of acute liver failure.