Patient Perspectives on Hospital Falls Prevention Education

Fall risk factors and mitigation strategies for hematological malignancy patients: insights from a qualitative study using the reason model

PURPOSE

Our study aim was to understand the (human and organizational) factors influencing fall risk among people with hematological malignancies using the Reason model as a framework, providing insights that can inform the development of safe and effective fall management strategies.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was employed to conduct semi-structured interviews with 13 people with hematological malignancies and 12 nurses from the hematology department of a tertiary grade A hospital in Guangzhou from December 2023 to February 2024. The topic analysis method was utilized to analyze the interview data.

RESULTS

Factors influencing fall risk among people with hematological malignancies were categorized into four themes: (1) precondition of unsafe arts (lack of work experience in junior nurses, poor patient compliance, adverse drug reactions, inadequate ward facilities); (2) unsafe supervision (inadequate inspection management, inadequate accompanying capacity); (3) unsafe arts (variability in subjective assessment, lack of bidirectional education); and (4) organizational influences (limited nursing human resources, lack of organizational process management models).

CONCLUSION

The specific fall risk factors among people with hematological malignancies, as summarized based on the Reason model framework, provide a theoretical basis and direction for the construction of specialized fall risk assessment tools, aiming to improve the quality of fall management for inpatients and reduce the incidence of falls.

Patient safety is our business! Staff perspectives on implementing hospital falls prevention education

Providing patients with falls prevention education reduces falls in hospitals, yet there is limited research on what influences successful implementation at the staff, ward and hospital levels. We engaged hospital-based health professionals to identify multi-level barriers and enablers to patient falls education that could influence the implementation of a Safe Recovery program. Purposive sampling was used to recruit hospital staff (n = 40) for focus groups and one-on-one interviews. Data were analysed using content analysis and categorized using a socio-ecological framework to understand the micro, meso and macro level influences of hospital falls prevention. We identified five overarching themes, on the barriers and enablers to implementation of the Safe Recovery program. The enablers to falls prevention education included sharing the responsibility to implement the program, setting clear goals for staff, showing the impact of delivering the program, involving family to reinforce the messaging, using falls champions to upskill staff and making the resources (video and booklet) readily available to patients at all times. Barriers included insufficient time for staff to deliver falls prevention education, lack of falls prevention training for staff during their clinical training, absence of standardized protocols and clinical guidelines across hospital settings and insufficient hospital marketing to promote the program. Using a systems thinking approach, this study showed that implementation requires more advocacy and support for patient falls prevention across different tiers of the hospital system to integrate into usual care.

Exploring the influence of hospital context on acute care physical therapy fall prevention practice: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Falls are a significant concern for hospitals and patients. The risk of falls is particularly heightened around the period of hospitalization. Physical therapy (PT) is commonly consulted for hospitalized patients at-risk for falls, yet it is unknown how the hospital context influences fall prevention practice among physical therapists.

PURPOSE

To explore the perspectives of acute care physical therapists on fall prevention practices within hospital settings and examine how specific contextual factors influence their practice patterns and the effectiveness ofPT interventions.

METHODS

A prospective qualitative study using collaborative qualitative data analysis was conducted through semi-structured interviews with acute care physical therapists nationwide. Interviews focused on therapists' perceptions of fall prevention practices, PT intervention effectiveness, and the influence of hospital context.

RESULTS

We derived three primary themes and ten subthemes. First, mobility promotion was identified as central to fall prevention, requiring a system-wide culture involving multidisciplinary teams, particularly nursing staff. Second, systemic factors, such as time constraints, institutional priorities, high patient volumes, staff availability, equipment availability, and the physical environment, were found to limit optimal PT practice for fall prevention. Third, the effectiveness of PT interventions was context-dependent, with therapists adapting their practices to maximize impact within systemic constraints. Notably, clinical experience seemed to mitigate some practice limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the acknowledged benefits of PT, systemic factors often prevent therapists from implementing effective fall prevention interventions. Addressing these contextual barriers and developing standards of practice may enhance patient safety and the overall success of fall prevention efforts in hospitals.

Inpatients' experiences of falls: A qualitative meta-synthesis

OBJECTIVES

Identify and synthesize published qualitative research reporting inpatient experiences of a fall to determine novel insights and understandings of this longstanding complex problem.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative meta-synthesis.

METHODS

Online databases were searched to systematically identify published research reporting inpatient experiences of a fall. The included studies were inductively analysed and interpreted then reported as a meta-synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

Databases Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid Emcare, CINAHL Complete, Scopus and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched on 3rd August, 2023.

RESULTS

From 10 included publications, four new themes of inpatients' experiences of a fall were constructed. Themes one, two and three related to antecedents of patient falls, and theme four related to consequences. Theme one, 'My foot didn't come with me: Physiological and anatomical changes', encompassed patients' experiences of medical conditions, medication, and anatomical changes. These aspects contributed to alterations in balance and strength, and misconceptions of capability in activities of daily (inpatient) living. Theme two, 'I was in a hurry: Help-seeking', encompassed patients' experiences striving for independence while balancing power and control, minimizing their own needs over care of others', and unavailability of support. Theme three, 'I couldn't find the call light: Environment and equipment', encompassed patients' experiences of not being able to reach or use equipment, and environment changes. Theme four, 'It was my fault too: Blame and confidence', encompassed patients' expressions of blame after their fall, blame directed at both themselves and/or others, and impacts on confidence and fear in mobilizing.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient falls are embedded in a complexity of individual, relational, and environmental factors, yet there are potential ways forward both informed and led by the patient's voice. Strength-based approaches to address the tenuous balance between independence and support may be one opportunity to explore as a next step in complementing the existing multifaceted interventions.

IMPACT

Inpatient falls are a complex and costly health safety and quality problem. Despite global initiatives in the prevention of inpatient falls, they remain intractable. This meta-synthesis provides an in-depth exploration of extant qualitative data on patients' experiences of falls in hospitals. Four themes were constructed expressing the inpatients' experiences: physiological and anatomical changes, help-seeking, environment and equipment, and blame and confidence. Novel considerations for future investigation are offered, drawing from self-determination theory and positive psychological interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE

This meta-synthesis elicits new considerations for future interventions based on people's experiences of their fall in hospital, offering healthcare professionals novel directions in fall prevention.

REPORTING METHOD

The review was reported according to the Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research statement (ENTREQ; Tong et al., 2012).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023445279.

Boosting hospital falls prevention using health assistant staff alongside usual care

OBJECTIVES

Patient education is crucial for preventing hospital falls, yet workforce constraints can hinder targeted delivery. Utilising supervised healthcare assistants can enhance standard care. This study sought to understand factors that impact the feasibility of supplementing usual care with patient falls education delivered by supervised allied health assistants.

METHODS

In a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial, focus groups and interviews were conducted with twelve health assistants, seven allied health professionals and two managers from the participating hospital. This elicited insights on barriers and facilitators to implementing workforce redesign to deliver tailored patient falls education. An inductive approach was used to thematically analyse the data.

RESULTS

Three key themes emerged: (i) it was feasible for health assistants to deliver hospital patient education; (ii) patients engaged with hospital falls prevention education delivered by assistants; (iii) hospital workforce redesign can be successfully implemented provided there is system-wide buy-in.

CONCLUSIONS

Health assistants can be trained to successfully deliver hospital falls prevention education provided they have adequate supervision, training, and resources.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Sustained implementation requires dedicated staffing hours for service delivery and staff education.

Effect of structured nurse-patient conversation on preventing falls among patients in an acute care hospital: A mixed study

Objectives

Inpatient falls are a major patient safety issue in acute care hospitals. Multifactorial in-hospital fall prevention programs have shown reductions in falls and related risks. One common element of successful programs is active patient involvement. This study objective was to explore patients' and nurses' experiences with a structured intervention to foster patient involvement.

Methods

This study was conducted between September 2020 and April 2021 in a university hospital neurological ward. The studied intervention consisted of a falls information leaflet, and a structured nurse-patient conversation about fall risk-reduction activities. Nurses were trained to deliver the intervention and supported throughout the study. Nurses' and patients' experiences regarding personal involvement, satisfaction, and confidence were surveyed and analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results

Fifty-six patients recruited by ward nurses received the intervention. After receiving the intervention, patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the in-hospital fall prevention conversation. Twenty-one nurses indicated that they would use the leaflet and communication aid. Twenty-one nurses commented on intervention facilitators and barriers. More specific facilitators included their shared perception that "handing out the leaflet to patients was not problematic" and that the leaflet was seen as "applicable in many patient situations." Their comments indicated two particularly prominent barriers to conducting the intervention in clinical practice: 1) "finding the time for the implementation in the daily clinical routine and workload" and 2) "environmental factors like a noisy and busy atmosphere on the ward."

Conclusions

This study provides insights into a patient involvement intervention featuring a structured nurse-patient discussion about fall risks. The accompanying information leaflet and communication guide require adaptations to facilitate sustainable implementation into the hospital's fall prevention program, but proved useful.

Considerations across multiple stakeholder groups when implementing fall prevention programs in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Falls in hospital remain a common and costly patient safety issue internationally. There is evidence that falls in hospitals can be prevented by multifactorial programs and by education for patients and staff, but these are often not routinely or effectively implemented in practice. Perspectives of multiple key stakeholder groups could inform implementation of fall prevention strategies.

METHODS

Clinicians of different disciplines, patients and their families were recruited from wards at two acute public hospitals. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted to gain a broad understanding of participants' perspectives about implementing fall prevention programs. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS

Data from 50 participants revealed three key themes across the stakeholder groups shaping implementation of acute hospital fall prevention programs: (i) 'Fall prevention is a priority, but whose?' where participants agreed falls in hospital should be addressed but did not necessarily see themselves as responsible for this; (ii) 'Disempowered stakeholders' where participants expressed feeling frustrated and powerless with fall prevention in acute hospital settings; and (iii) 'Shared responsibility may be a solution' where participants were optimistic about the positive impact of collective action on effectively implementing fall prevention strategies.

CONCLUSION

Key stakeholder groups agree that hospital fall prevention is a priority, however, challenges related to role perception, competing priorities, workforce pressure and disempowerment mean fall prevention may often be neglected in practice. Improving shared responsibility for fall prevention implementation across disciplines, organisational levels and patients, family and staff may help overcome this.

Assessing the Effectiveness of a Non-Punitive Fall Prevention Program

Background

Our single-center, quality improvement project evaluated the impact of a fall reduction plan while using a Just Culture Algorithm that included weekly fall reviews involving front line staff using a non-punitive structure. The project has shown successful results.

Methods

Prior to starting the program, data at this institution indicated falls were higher than the national fall rate of 3-5 per 1000 patient days. To achieve the goal of reducing the fall rate to below 3.1, an interdisciplinary fall committee was formed, consisting of nurses, nursing leaders, patient care technicians, pharmacists, and physical therapists. The committee operated in a non-punitive format and included all staff members directly involved in fall-related incidents. Protocols for implementing an evidence-based prevention program were developed to (1) address environmental concerns, (2) educate clinical workers and patients' families, (3) enforce interventions, (4) conduct weekly non-punitive, round table discussions, and (5) provide leadership support. Measures were implemented to proactively prevent falls. Data was collected and reported to all departments monthly.

Results

Following implementation of the program, results showed a statistically significant decrease in average fall rates per 1000 patient days from pre-intervention (4.05) to post-intervention (2.54) (P = .0001). Results showed improvement below the national average (3-5 falls per 1000 patient days), resulting in cost savings for the institution due to fewer falls. Inpatient medical-surgical and progressive care units had a noteworthy decline in the total number of falls, with notable estimated cost savings.

Conclusion

Preventative interventions have shown effective results with compassionate, non-punitive leadership, an interdisciplinary team, and continuous follow-up education. Heeding to the Just Culture Algorithm as the foundation of weekly reviews, staff were empowered to engage in fall reduction strategies. A comprehensive weekly fall review program with ongoing staff education and transparent data reporting yielded a significant, sustained reduction in patient falls, with a substantial cost savings in excess of $1.6 million dollars over the life of the program.

Implementing falls prevention patient education in hospitals - older people's views on barriers and enablers

BACKGROUND

World falls guidelines recommend that hospitalised older patients receive individualised falls prevention education, yet no studies have sought older people's feedback on how best to deliver falls prevention education in hospitals. The objective of the study was to explore the perspectives of older people and their caregivers about barriers and enablers to implementation of a tailored hospital falls education program.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was used. Three focus groups and 16 semi-structured interviews were conducted. A purposive sample of older people who had previous hospital admissions and caregivers of older people were selected to review a co-designed patient falls education program (the revised Safe Recovery program). They provided feedback on how to implement the program in hospital settings. Data were thematically analysed taking an deductive-inductive approach.

RESULTS

Participants were 37 older people [female n = 24 (64.9%), age range 64 to 89 years] and nine caregivers (female n = 8). The first theme was that the Safe Recovery Program resources were of high quality, enabling strong patient engagement and increased knowledge and awareness about falls prevention in hospitals. The second theme identified practical strategies to enable program delivery in hospital wards. The key enablers identified were: timing of delivery around wellness and the patient's mobility; tailoring messages for each older patient; key staff members being assigned to lead program delivery. Participants recommended that staff assist older patients to set appropriate behavioural goals in relation to preventing falls in hospitals. They also recommended that staff raise older patients' confidence and motivation to take action to reduce the risk of falls. Providing resources in other languages and alternative shorter versions was recommended to enable broad dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

Older people and their caregivers advised that implementing falls education in hospitals can be enabled by using high quality resources, delivering falls education in a timely manner and personalising the education and support to individual needs.

Root cause analysis and strategies for reducing falls among inpatients in healthcare facilities: A narrative review

Background and Aims

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a systematic process which can be applied to analyze fall incidences in reactive manner to identify contributing factors and propose actions for preventing future falls. To better understand cause of falls and effective interventions for their reduction we conducted a narrative review of RCA and Strategies for Reducing Falls among Inpatients in Healthcare Facilities.

Methods

In this narrative review, databases including Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed were searched to obtain the related literature published. Databases were searched from January 2005 until the end of March 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool was used for quality assessment of articles. To analyze the data, a five-stage framework analysis method was utilized.

Results

Seven articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were identified for this study. All of the selected studies were interventional in nature and employed the RCA method to ascertain the underlying causes of inpatient falls. The root causes discovered for falls involved patient-related factors (37.5%), environmental factors (25%), organizational and process factors (19.6%), staff and communication factors (17.9%). Strategies to reduce falls involved environmental measures and physical protection (29.4%), identifying, and displaying the causes of risk (23.5%), education and culturalization (21.6%), standard fall risk assessment tool (13.7%), and supervision and monitoring (11.8%).

Conclusion

the findings identify the root causes of falls in inpatient units and provide guidance for successful action plan execution. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of considering the unique characteristics of healthcare organizations and adapting interventions accordingly for effectiveness in different settings.

'You Just Struggle on Your Own': Exploring Older People and Their Caregivers' Perspectives About Falls Prevention Education in Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Providing older patients with an opportunity to participate in individualised falls preventive education, has been shown to reduce hospital falls. However, few studies have explored older peoples' perspectives of hospital falls prevention education. This study aimed to explore older people and their caregivers' knowledge and awareness about hospital falls prevention, including their reflections on the education they received when hospitalised.

METHODS

A qualitative, exploratory study with focus groups and semistructured interviews was conducted. Participants were a purposively selected sample of community-dwelling older people (65+ years) admitted to a hospital in the past 5 years and caregivers of older people. Data were thematically analysed using deductive and inductive approaches, and a capability-opportunity-motivation-behaviour model was applied to understand key determinants of implementing falls education for hospitalised older people.

RESULTS

Participants' [n = 46 (older people n = 37, age range 60-89 years), caregivers n = 9] feedback identified five themes: distress and disempowerment if the participant did have a hospital fall or nearly fell, anxiety and uncertainty about what behaviour was required while in hospital, insufficient and inconsistent falls prevention education, inadequate communication and underlying attitudes of ageism. Applying a behaviour change model suggested that older people and their caregivers did not develop falls prevention knowledge, awareness or motivation to engage in falls prevention behaviour. Older people were also provided with limited opportunities to engage in falls preventive behaviour while in hospital.

CONCLUSION

Older people in our study received sporadic education about falls prevention during their hospital admissions which did not raise their awareness and knowledge about the risk of falls or their capability to engage in safe falls preventive behaviour. Conflicting messages may result in older people feeling confused and anxious about staying safe in hospital.

Falls prevention is more than just promoting physical health: evaluation of the group-based, out-patient prevention program 'Staying safe and active in old age - falls prevention'

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the German falls prevention program 'Staying safe and active in old age - falls prevention', which is already established in practice.

Methods

The single-arm intervention study consisted of two time points, 6 months apart, to evaluate the multifactorial falls prevention program (n = 125 at Time 2). We observed the groups and their trainers and assessed which behavior change techniques (BCTs) were used. According to our evaluation framework, changes in the following three domains were assessed: (a) fall-related variables (i.e. number of falls, fear of falling), (b) physical functioning (i.e. performance-based gait speed, coordination, self-reported leg strength, balance, as well as habitual execution of the exercises), and (c) psychosocial functioning (i.e. quality of life, activities of daily living, mobility, and loneliness). Linear mixed models were used to determine changes in each variable.

Results

Demonstration of behavior was the most frequently used BCT. The program showed significant benefits for fear of falling, balance, coordination, habitual execution, and loneliness over time (Cohen's d between -0.59 and 1.73). Number of falls, gait speed, coordination (dual task), activities of daily living, and quality of life were maintained (Cohen's d between -0.26 and 0.30), whereas leg strength and mobility decreased significantly at Time 2 (Cohen's d = -0.55 and -0.36).

Discussion

Group-based falls prevention programs may facilitate social integration among older adults and may also enhance and maintain physical functioning in old age.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00012321.

Preliminary Analysis of Fall Concern Among Family Caregivers of Older Adults Discharged From the Hospital: A Psychometric Evaluation of the Carers' Fall Concern Instrument

PURPOSE

To provide a preliminary descriptive analysis of the change in fall concern among family caregiver-care recipient dyads during hospitalization and after discharge as part of a prospective study exploring the psychometric properties of the Carers' Fall Concern Instrument.

METHOD

Using a prospective cohort design, an interviewer-administered survey was completed by dyads at 48 hours before discharge and 1 week and 30 days after discharge.

RESULTS

Of family caregivers, 76.9% thought their care recipient was at risk of falling and 61.5% were afraid of them falling. However, only 34.6% of older adults thought that they were at risk of falling and only 42.3% were afraid of falling. Family caregivers reported significantly less concern about falls after their care recipients were discharged.

CONCLUSION

This study provided greater insight into caregiver-care recipient dyads' fall concern during their transition from hospital to home that may guide post-discharge fall prevention education on falls. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(5), 14-18.].

A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a care-bundle to prevent falls in older hospitalised patients

BACKGROUND

Patient accidental falls in a hospital environment are a serious problem for patient safety, and for the additional costs due to associated medical interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The endpoints of this study were the assessment of the fall incidence in the hospital before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care-bundle, along with a cost-effectiveness evaluation.

DESIGN

A stepped-wedge trial was conducted between April 2015 and December 2016 in Bologna University Hospital.

METHODS

Incidence rates (IRs) of falls in both the control and intervention periods were calculated. A multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear model with logit link function, adjusted for age, sex, cluster cross-over timing and patients' clinical severity was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) of fall risk of patients of the intervention group respect to the controls.Intervention costs associated with the introduction of the care-bundle intervention were spread between patients per cluster-period-group of exposure. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated using total costs in the intervention and control groups.

RESULTS

IRs of falls in control and intervention periods were respectively 3.15 and 2.58 for 1,000 bed-days. After adjustment, the subjects receiving the intervention had a statistically significant reduced risk of falling with respect to those who did not (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.84). According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost per fall prevented was €873.92 considering all costs, and €1644.45 excluding costs related falls.

CONCLUSIONS

Care-bundle had a protective effect on patients, with a statistically significant reduction of the fall risk. This type of intervention appears cost-effective compared to routine practices.

Prevention of Falls in Parkinson's Disease: Guidelines and Gaps

Background

People living with Parkinson's disease (PD) have a high risk for falls.

Objective

To examine gaps in falls prevention targeting people with PD as part of the Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults.

Methods

A Delphi consensus process was used to identify specific recommendations for falls in PD. The current narrative review was conducted as educational background with a view to identifying gaps in fall prevention.

Results

A recent Cochrane review recommended exercises and structured physical activities for PD; however, the types of exercises and activities to recommend and PD subgroups likely to benefit require further consideration. Freezing of gait, reduced gait speed, and a prior history of falls are risk factors for falls in PD and should be incorporated in assessments to identify fall risk and target interventions. Multimodal and multi-domain fall prevention interventions may be beneficial. With advanced or complex PD, balance and strength training should be administered under supervision. Medications, particularly cholinesterase inhibitors, show promise for falls prevention. Identifying how to engage people with PD, their families, and health professionals in falls education and implementation remains a challenge. Barriers to the prevention of falls occur at individual, environmental, policy, and health system levels.

Conclusion

Effective mitigation of fall risk requires specific targeting and strategies to reduce this debilitating and common problem in PD. While exercise is recommended, the types and modalities of exercise and how to combine them as interventions for different PD subgroups (cognitive impairment, freezing, advanced disease) need further study.

Development and evaluation of a simple predictive model for falls in acute care setting

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To develop a simple and reliable assessment tool for predicting falls in acute care settings.

BACKGROUND

Falling injures patients, lengthens hospital stay and leads to the wastage of financial and medical resources. Although there are many potential predictors for falls, a simple and reliable assessment tool is practically necessary in acute care settings.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The current study was conducted for participants who were admitted to a teaching hospital in Japan. Fall risk was assessed by the modified Japanese Nursing Association Fall Risk Assessment Tool consisting of 50 variables. To create a more convenient model, variables were first limited to 26 variables and then selected by stepwise logistic regression analysis. Models were derived and validated by dividing the whole dataset into a 7:3 ratio. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristic curve were evaluated. This study was conducted according to the STROBE guideline.

RESULTS

Six variables including age > 65 years, impaired extremities, muscle weakness, requiring mobility assistance, unstable gait and psychotropics were chosen in a stepwise selection. A model using these six variables with a cut-off point of 2 with one point for each item, was developed. Sensitivity and specificity >70% and area under the curve >.78 were observed in the validation dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a simple and reliable six-item model to predict patients at high risk of falling in acute care settings.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The model has also been verified to perform well with non-random partitioning by time and future research is expected to make it useful in acute care settings and clinical practice.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients participated in the study on an opt-out basis, contributing to the development of a simple predictive model for fall prevention during hospitalisation that can be shared with medical staff and patients in the future.

Original Research: Patient Perception of Fall Risk in the Acute Care Setting

PURPOSE

Hospitals are implementing a variety of fall prevention programs to reduce the fall rates of hospitalized patients. But if patients don't perceive themselves to be at risk for falling and don't adhere to fall prevention strategies, such programs are likely to be less effective. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of fall risk among hospitalized patients across four acute care specialty services.

METHODS

One hundred patients who had been admitted to the study hospital and who had a Morse Fall Scale score over 45 were asked to complete the Patient Perception Questionnaire, a tool designed to explore a patient's confidence regarding their fall risk, fear of falling, and intention to engage in fall prevention activities. Morse Fall Scale scores were collected via retrospective chart review. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, and independent sample t tests.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 65 years; 52% were male, 48% female. Although all 100 participants were deemed at risk for falls per their Morse Fall Scale scores, only 55% considered themselves to be at such risk. As patients' confidence in their ability to perform mobility tasks increased, their intention to ask for help and fear of falling significantly decreased. Patients who had been admitted as the result of a fall demonstrated significantly lower confidence scores and higher fear scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who score high on fall risk assessments often don't perceive themselves to be at high risk for falling, and thus might not engage in fall prevention activities. Developing a fall risk assessment method that incorporates both a patient's physiological condition and their perception of their fall risk could help reduce fall rates in the acute care setting.

Risk stratification for early and late falls in acute care settings

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Falling generally injures patients, lengthens hospital stays and leads to the wastage of financial and medical resources. Although falls can occur at any stage after hospital admission, there are no studies that characterise falls with length of hospital stay in acute care settings. This study aims to clarify risk stratification of early and late falls in acute care settings.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted for participants who were admitted to a teaching hospital in Japan. Patients' falls were divided into two groups based on the median of the fall date (day 10). Considering a 70/30 split, the logistic regression model was used to extract independent predictors for early and late falls for nine risk variables based on exploratory analysis among 26 items selected from the modified Japanese Nursing Association Fall Risk Assessment Tool, and risk models were validated. This study was conducted according to the STROBE guideline.

RESULTS

Of the 10,975 patients admitted, 87 and 90 with early and late falls, respectively, were identified. The five significant risk factors extracted for early falls were fall history, muscle weakness, impaired understanding, use of psychotropics and the personality trait of 'doing everything on one's own'; risk factors identified for late falls were being older than 65 years, impaired extremities and unstable gait, in addition to muscle weakness. Using these variables for early and late falls in the validation cohort, the concordance indices of the risk models were both over 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

By separately extracting risk factors for early and late falls in an acute care hospital setting, this study shed light on the characteristics of the respective types of falls.

RELEVANT TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

As the risk factors of falls vary according to the length of hospitalisation, specific preventive care can be implemented to avoid fall incidents.

Exploring Hospital Inpatients' Awareness of Their Falls Risk: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Patient falls in hospital may lead to physical, psychological, social and financial impacts. Understanding patients' perceptions of their fall risk will help to direct fall prevention strategies and understand patient behaviours. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and experiences that influence a patient's understanding of their fall risk in regional Australian hospitals. Semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted in wards across three Australian hospitals. Participants were aged 40 years and over, able to communicate in English and were mobile prior to hospital admission. Participants were excluded from the study if they returned a Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) score of less than 18 when assessed by the researcher. A total of 18 participants with an average age of 69.8 years (SD ± 12.7, range 41 to 84 years) from three regional Victorian hospitals were interviewed for this study. Data were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis identifying three major themes; (1) Environment (extrinsic) (2) Individual (intrinsic), and (3) Outcomes, as well as eight minor themes. Participants recognised the hazardous nature of a hospital and their personal responsibilities in staying safe. Falls education needs to be consistently delivered, with the focus on empowering the patient to help them adjust to changes in their clinical condition, whether temporary or permanent.

Falls as the result of interplay between nurses, patient and the environment: Using text-mining to uncover how and why falls happen

Objectives

This study aimed to explore, from the perspectives of nurses, how patients, the environment, and the practice of nurses interact with each other to contribute to patient falls.

Methods

A retrospective review of incident reports on patient falls, registered by nurses between 2016 and 2020, was conducted. The incident reports were retrieved from the database set up for the project of the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. The text descriptions of the "background of falls" were extracted verbatim, and analyzed by using a text-mining approach.

Results

A total of 4,176 incident reports on patient falls were analyzed. Of these falls, 79.0% were unwitnessed by nurses, and 8.7% occurred during direct nursing care. Document clustering identified 16 clusters. Four clusters were related to patients, such as the decline in their physiological/cognitive function, a loss of balance, and their use of hypnotic and psychotropic agents. Three clusters were related to nurses, and these included a lack of situation awareness, reliance on patient families, and insufficient implementation of the nursing process. Six clusters were concerned with patients and nurses, including the unproductive use of a bed alarm and call bells, the use of inappropriate footwear, the problematic use of walking aids and bedrails, and insufficient understanding of patients' activities of daily living. One cluster, chair-related falls, involved both patient and environmental factors. Finally, two clusters involved patient, nurse, and environmental factors, and these falls occurred when patients were bathing/showering or using a bedside commode.

Conclusions

Falls were caused by a dynamic interplay between patients, nurses, and the environment. Since many of the patient factors are difficult to modify in a short time, the focus has to be placed on nursing and environmental factors to reduce falls. In particular, improving nurses' situation awareness is of foremost importance, as it influences their decisions and actions to prevent falls.

Partnering With Patients: Fall Prevention Agreement

A fall prevention agreement was developed in a cardiac progressive care unit to engage patients and families on admission as partners in fall prevention. The postimplementation of the fall prevention agreement showed significant decreases in falls on this unit.

Relying on myself: The lived experience of being at risk for falling in the hospital among older adults

Inpatient fall rates have not significantly decreased the last decade. Older adults have an estimated 50% greater inpatient fall rate than younger adults. How older adults perceive their own fall risk affects their adherence to fall prevention recommendations. The aim of this phenomenological study was to understand the lived experiences of being at risk for falling in the hospital among older adults. Nine participants (N=9) aged 65 years and older (female=55%) were interviewed twice using online video-conferencing after hospital discharge, and interview data was analyzed using van Manen's interpretive phenomenological method. Five major interpretive themes emerged: Relying on Myself, Managing Balance Problems in an Unfamiliar Environment, Struggling to Maintain Identity, Following the Hospital Rules, and Maintaining Dignity in the Relationships with Nursing Staff. Hospitalized older adults employed their self-efficacy to manage balance problems in the hospital. Additional fall prevention interventions supporting hospitalized older adults' self-management of fall risk are needed.

Implementing Patient Falls Education in Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Trial

Patient education is key to preventing hospital falls yet is inconsistently implemented by health professionals. A mixed methods study was conducted involving a ward-based evaluation of patients receiving education from health professionals using a scripted conversation guide with a falls prevention brochure, followed by semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of health professionals involved in delivering the intervention. Over five weeks, 37 patients consented to surveys (intervention n = 27; control n = 10). The quantitative evaluation showed that falls prevention education was not systematically implemented in the trial ward. Seven individual interviews were conducted with health professionals to understand the reasons why implementation failed. Perceived barriers included time constraints, limited interprofessional collaboration, and a lack of staff input into designing the research project and patient interventions. Perceived enablers included support from senior staff, consistent reinforcement of falls education by health professionals, and fostering patient empowerment and engagement. Recommended strategies to enhance implementation included ensuring processes were in place supporting health professional accountability, the inclusion of stakeholder input in designing the falls intervention and implementation processes, as well as leadership engagement in falls prevention education. Although health professionals play a key role in delivering evidence-based falls prevention education in hospitals, implementation can be compromised by staff capacity, capability, and opportunities for co-design with patients and researchers. Organisational buy-in to practice change facilitates the implementation of evidence-based falls prevention activities.

Interprofessional education to implement patient falls education in hospitals: Lessons learned

AIM

The aim of this study was to design, deliver and evaluate an interprofessional education programme for healthcare professionals on how to implement a modified version of the safe recovery programme to prevent falls in hospitalized patients.

DESIGN

Mixed methods design incorporating pre- and post education surveys and individual semi-structured interviews.

METHODS

Thirty-four health professional participants attended a 1-h face-to-face or Zoom® interprofessional education session to learn how to deliver an evidence-based patient falls prevention education strategy, the modified Safe Recovery Programme.

RESULTS

A 1-hour education session was insufficient to build full confidence to deliver the Safe Recovery Programme. There was no statistically significant change in participant views on interprofessional collaboration. Participants recommended prior consultation and preparation before delivery of IPE, with additional opportunities for discussion and feedback during implementation with patients. The findings highlight the importance of interprofessional education for evidence-based interventions in hospitals. Health professionals value education that is timely, interactive, realistic and engaging.

Adult Inpatients' Perceptions of Their Fall Risk: A Scoping Review

Patient falls in hospitals continue to be a global concern due to the poor health outcomes and costs that can occur. A large number of falls in hospitals are unwitnessed and mostly occur due to patient behaviours and not seeking assistance. Understanding these patient behaviours may help to direct fall prevention strategies, with evidence suggesting the need to integrate patients' perspectives into fall management. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the extent of the literature about patients' perceptions and experiences of their fall risk in hospital and/or of falling in hospital. This review was conducted using a five-stage methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O'Malley. A total of nine databases were searched using key search terms such as "fall*", "perception" and "hospital." International peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched between the years 2011 and 2021. A total of 41 articles, ranging in study design, met the inclusion criteria. After reporting on the article demographics and fall perception constructs and measures, the qualitative and quantitative findings were organised into five domains: Fall Risk Perception Measures, Patients' Perceptions of Fall Risk, Patients' Perceptions of Falling in Hospital, Patients' Fear of Falling and Barriers to Fall Prevention in Hospital. Approximately two-thirds of study participants did not accurately identify their fall risk compared to that defined by a health professional. This demonstrates the importance of partnering with patients and obtaining their insights on their perceived fall risk, as this may help to inform fall management and care. This review identified further areas for research that may help to inform fall prevention in a hospital setting, including the need for further research into fall risk perception measures.

Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Falls remain a common and debilitating problem in hospitals worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of falls prevention interventions on falls rates and the risk of falling in hospital.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalised adults.

INTERVENTION

Prevention methods included staff and patient education, environmental modifications, assistive devices, policies and systems, rehabilitation, medication management and management of cognitive impairment. We evaluated single and multi-factorial approaches.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Falls rate ratios (rate ratio: RaR) and falls risk, as defined by the odds of being a faller in the intervention compared to control group (odds ratio: OR).

RESULTS

There were 43 studies that satisfied the systematic review criteria and 23 were included in meta-analyses. There was marked heterogeneity in intervention methods and study designs. The only intervention that yielded a significant result in the meta-analysis was education, with a reduction in falls rates (RaR = 0.70 [0.51-0.96], P = 0.03) and the odds of falling (OR = 0.62 [0.47-0.83], P = 0.001). The patient and staff education studies in the meta-analysis were of high quality on the GRADE tool. Individual trials in the systematic review showed evidence for clinician education, some multi-factorial interventions, select rehabilitation therapies, and systems, with low to moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Patient and staff education can reduce hospital falls. Multi-factorial interventions had a tendency towards producing a positive impact. Chair alarms, bed alarms, wearable sensors and use of scored risk assessment tools were not associated with significant fall reductions.