1
|
Xavier C, Morel I, Siegenthaler R, Dohme-Meier F, Dubois S, Luginbühl T, Le Cozler Y, Lerch S. Three-dimensional imaging to estimate in vivo body and carcass chemical composition of growing beef-on-dairy crossbred bulls. Animal 2024; 18:101174. [PMID: 38761441 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The dynamics of cattle body chemical composition during growth and fattening periods determine animal performance and beef carcass quality. The aim of this study was to estimate the empty body (EB) and carcass chemical composition of growing beef-on-dairy crossbred bulls (Brown Swiss breed as dam with Angus, Limousin or Simmental as sire) using three-dimensional (3D) imaging. The 3D images of the cattle's external body shape were recorded in vivo on 48 bulls along growth trajectory (75-520 kg BW and 34-306 kg hot carcass weight [HCW]; set 1) and on 70 bulls at target market slaughter weight, including 18 animals from set 1 (average 517 ± 10 kg BW and 289 ± 10 kg HCW; set 2). The linear, circumference, curve, surface and volume measurements on the 3D body shape were determined. Those predictive variables were used in partial least square regressions, together with the effect of the sire breed whenever significant (P < 0.05), with leave-one-out cross-validation to estimate water, lipid, protein, mineral and energy mass or proportions in the EB and carcass. Mass and proportions were determined directly from postmortem grinding and chemical analyses (set 1) or indirectly using the 11th rib dissection method (set 2). In set 1, bulls' BW and HCW were estimated via 3D imaging, with root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 12 kg and 6 kg, respectively. The EB and carcass chemical component proportions were estimated with RMSEP from 0.2% for EB minerals (observed mean 3.7 ± 0.2%) to 1.8% for EB lipid (11.6 ± 4.2%), close to the RMSEP found for the carcass. In set 2, the RMSEP for estimation via 3D imaging was 9 kg for BW and 6 kg for HCW. The EB energy and protein proportions were estimated, with RMSEP of 0.5 MJ/kg fresh matter (10.1 ± 0.8 MJ/DM) and 0.2% (18.7 ± 0.7%), respectively. Overall, the estimations of chemical component proportions from 3D imaging were slightly less precise for both sets than the mass estimations. The morphological traits from the 3D images appeared to be precise estimators of BW, HCW as well as EB and carcass chemical component masses and proportions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Xavier
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland; PEGASE INRAE-Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, 16 Le Clos, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
| | - I Morel
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
| | - R Siegenthaler
- Research Contracts Animals Group, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
| | - F Dohme-Meier
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
| | - S Dubois
- Feed Chemistry Research Group, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
| | - T Luginbühl
- 3D Ouest, 5 rue de Broglie, 22300 Lannion, France
| | - Y Le Cozler
- PEGASE INRAE-Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, 16 Le Clos, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
| | - S Lerch
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nisbet H, Lambe N, Miller G, Doeschl-Wilson A, Barclay D, Wheaton A, Duthie CA. Using in-abattoir 3-dimensional measurements from images of beef carcasses for the prediction of EUROP classification grade and carcass weight. Meat Sci 2024; 209:109391. [PMID: 38043328 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Imaging technology can aid the automatic extraction of measurements from beef carcasses, which can be used for objective grading. Many abattoirs, however, rely on manual grading due to the required infrastructure and cost, making technology unfeasible. This study explores 3-dimensional (3D) imaging technology, requiring limited infrastructure, and its ability to predict carcass weight, conformation class and fat class for non-invasive, objective classification. Time-of-flight near-infrared cameras captured 3-dimensional point clouds of beef carcasses, on-line in one commercial abattoir in Scotland, over a 6-month period. Thirty-five 3D images were captured per carcass and processed using machine vison software. Seventy-four measurements were extracted from each point cloud. Removal of extreme outliers resulted in 285,109 datapoints for 17,250 carcasses. Coefficients of variation (CV) for each measurement on a per-animal basis were low and consistent, and measurements were averaged across images. Using a training and validation dataset (70:30), multiple linear regression models predicted EUROP conformation class, fat class, and carcass weight. Stepwise models included fixed effects (sex, breed type, kill date (and cold carcass weight for conformation and fat class)), and 3D image measurements. Including 3D measurements resulted in prediction accuracies of 70%, 50% and 23% for cold carcass weight, conformation, and fat class respectively. Mapping predictions on the traditional EUROP grid used in the UK showed that 99% of conformation classes and 93% of fat classes were classified within the correct or neighbouring grade. The results of this study indicate the potential for non-invasive, in-abattoir technology requiring limited infrastructure to predict carcass traits objectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Nisbet
- Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK; The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, UK.
| | - Nicola Lambe
- Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gemma Miller
- Scotland's Rural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Hu Y, Xiang L, Morota G, Brooks SA, Wickens CL, Miller-Cushon EK, Yu H. Technical note: ShinyAnimalCV: open-source cloud-based web application for object detection, segmentation, and three-dimensional visualization of animals using computer vision. J Anim Sci 2024; 102:skad416. [PMID: 38134209 PMCID: PMC10903971 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Computer vision (CV), a non-intrusive and cost-effective technology, has furthered the development of precision livestock farming by enabling optimized decision-making through timely and individualized animal care. The availability of affordable two- and three-dimensional camera sensors, combined with various machine learning and deep learning algorithms, has provided a valuable opportunity to improve livestock production systems. However, despite the availability of various CV tools in the public domain, applying these tools to animal data can be challenging, often requiring users to have programming and data analysis skills, as well as access to computing resources. Moreover, the rapid expansion of precision livestock farming is creating a growing need to educate and train animal science students in CV. This presents educators with the challenge of efficiently demonstrating the complex algorithms involved in CV. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop ShinyAnimalCV, an open-source cloud-based web application designed to facilitate CV teaching in animal science. This application provides a user-friendly interface for performing CV tasks, including object segmentation, detection, three-dimensional surface visualization, and extraction of two- and three-dimensional morphological features. Nine pre-trained CV models using top-view animal data are included in the application. ShinyAnimalCV has been deployed online using cloud computing platforms. The source code of ShinyAnimalCV is available on GitHub, along with detailed documentation on training CV models using custom data and deploying ShinyAnimalCV locally to allow users to fully leverage the capabilities of the application. ShinyAnimalCV can help to support the teaching of CV, thereby laying the groundwork to promote the adoption of CV in the animal science community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Wang
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Yu Hu
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Lirong Xiang
- Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Gota Morota
- School of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
| | - Samantha A Brooks
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Carissa L Wickens
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | | | - Haipeng Yu
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Camacho-Pérez E, Lugo-Quintal JM, Tirink C, Aguilar-Quiñonez JA, Gastelum-Delgado MA, Lee-Rangel HA, Roque-Jiménez JA, Garcia-Herrera RA, Chay-Canul AJ. Predicting carcass tissue composition in Blackbelly sheep using ultrasound measurements and machine learning methods. Trop Anim Health Prod 2023; 55:300. [PMID: 37723326 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-023-03759-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to predict Blackbelly sheep carcass tissue composition using ultrasound measurements and machine learning models. The models evaluated were decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, and multi-layer perceptrons and were used to predict the total carcass bone (TCB), total carcass fat (TCF), and total carcass muscle (TCM). The best model for predicting the three parameters, TCB, TCF, and TCM was random forests, with mean squared error (MSE) of 0.31, 0.33, and 0.53; mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.26, 0.29, and 0.53; and the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.67, 0.69, and 0.76, respectively. The results showed that machine learning methods from in vivo ultrasound measurements can be used as determinants of carcass tissue composition, resulting in reliable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Camacho-Pérez
- Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Av. Industrias No Contaminantes S/N, Mérida, Yucatán, México
| | | | - Cem Tirink
- Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Igdir University, TR76000, Igdir, Turkey
| | - José Antonio Aguilar-Quiñonez
- Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Km 17.5 Carretera Culiacán-El Dorado, Culiacán, 80000, Sinaloa, México
| | - Miguel A Gastelum-Delgado
- Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Km 17.5 Carretera Culiacán-El Dorado, Culiacán, 80000, Sinaloa, México
| | - Héctor Aarón Lee-Rangel
- Centro de Biociencias, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Instituto de Investigaciones en Zonas Desérticas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Km 14.5 Carr, San Luis Potosí-Matehuala, 78321, México
| | - José Alejandro Roque-Jiménez
- Centro de Biociencias, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Instituto de Investigaciones en Zonas Desérticas, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Km 14.5 Carr, San Luis Potosí-Matehuala, 78321, México
| | - Ricardo Alfonso Garcia-Herrera
- División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carr. Villahermosa-Teapa, Km 25, CP 86280, Villahermosa, Tabasco, México
| | - Alfonso J Chay-Canul
- División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carr. Villahermosa-Teapa, Km 25, CP 86280, Villahermosa, Tabasco, México.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jiang B, Tang W, Cui L, Deng X. Precision Livestock Farming Research: A Global Scientometric Review. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:2096. [PMID: 37443894 DOI: 10.3390/ani13132096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision livestock farming (PLF) utilises information technology to continuously monitor and manage livestock in real-time, which can improve individual animal health, welfare, productivity and the environmental impact of animal husbandry, contributing to the economic, social and environmental sustainability of livestock farming. PLF has emerged as a pivotal area of multidisciplinary interest. In order to clarify the knowledge evolution and hotspot replacement of PLF research, based on the relevant data from the Web of Science database from 1973 to 2023, this study analyzed the main characteristics, research cores and hot topics of PLF research via CiteSpace. The results point to a significant increase in studies on PLF, with countries having advanced livestock farming systems in Europe and America publishing frequently and collaborating closely across borders. Universities in various countries have been leading the research, with Daniel Berckmans serving as the academic leader. Research primarily focuses on animal science, veterinary science, computer science, agricultural engineering, and environmental science. Current research hotspots center around precision dairy and cattle technology, intelligent systems, and animal behavior, with deep learning, accelerometer, automatic milking systems, lameness, estrus detection, and electronic identification being the main research directions, and deep learning and machine learning represent the forefront of current research. Research hot topics mainly include social science in PLF, the environmental impact of PLF, information technology in PLF, and animal welfare in PLF. Future research in PLF should prioritize inter-institutional and inter-scholar communication and cooperation, integration of multidisciplinary and multimethod research approaches, and utilization of deep learning and machine learning. Furthermore, social science issues should be given due attention in PLF, and the integration of intelligent technologies in animal management should be strengthened, with a focus on animal welfare and the environmental impact of animal husbandry, to promote its sustainable development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Jiang
- College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
- Development Research Center of Modern Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
| | - Wenjie Tang
- College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
| | - Lihang Cui
- College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
| | - Xiaoshang Deng
- College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin‐Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortazar Schmidt C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MA, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde A, Viltrop A, Jensen MB, Waiblinger S, Candiani D, Lima E, Mosbach‐Schulz O, Van der Stede Y, Vitali M, Winckler C. Welfare of calves. EFSA J 2023; 21:e07896. [PMID: 37009444 PMCID: PMC10050971 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
This Scientific Opinion addresses a European Commission request on the welfare of calves as part of the Farm to Fork strategy. EFSA was asked to provide a description of common husbandry systems and related welfare consequences, as well as measures to prevent or mitigate the hazards leading to them. In addition, recommendations on three specific issues were requested: welfare of calves reared for white veal (space, group housing, requirements of iron and fibre); risk of limited cow–calf contact; and animal‐based measures (ABMs) to monitor on‐farm welfare in slaughterhouses. The methodology developed by EFSA to address similar requests was followed. Fifteen highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, with respiratory disorders, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, gastroenteric disorders and group stress being the most frequent across husbandry systems. Recommendations to improve the welfare of calves include increasing space allowance, keeping calves in stable groups from an early age, ensuring good colostrum management and increasing the amounts of milk fed to dairy calves. In addition, calves should be provided with deformable lying surfaces, water via an open surface and long‐cut roughage in racks. Regarding specific recommendations for veal systems, calves should be kept in small groups (2–7 animals) within the first week of life, provided with ~ 20 m2/calf and fed on average 1 kg neutral detergent fibre (NDF) per day, preferably using long‐cut hay. Recommendations on cow–calf contact include keeping the calf with the dam for a minimum of 1 day post‐partum. Longer contact should progressively be implemented, but research is needed to guide this implementation in practice. The ABMs body condition, carcass condemnations, abomasal lesions, lung lesions, carcass colour and bursa swelling may be collected in slaughterhouses to monitor on‐farm welfare but should be complemented with behavioural ABMs collected on farm.
Collapse
|
7
|
Xavier C, Morel I, Dohme-Meier F, Siegenthaler R, Le Cozler Y, Lerch S. Estimation of carcass chemical composition in beef-on-dairy cattle using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of cold half-carcass or 11th rib cut. J Anim Sci 2023; 101:skad380. [PMID: 37950488 PMCID: PMC10718802 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to estimate the chemical composition (water, lipid, protein, mineral, and energy contents) of carcasses measured postmortem using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of cold half-carcass or 11th rib cut. One hundred and twenty beef-on-dairy (dam: Swiss Brown, sire: Angus, Limousin, or Simmental) bulls (n = 66), heifers (n = 42), and steers (n = 12) were included in the study. The reference carcass composition measured after grinding, homogenization, and chemical analyses was estimated from DXA variables using simple or multiple linear regressions with model training on 70% (n = 84) and validation on 30% (n = 36) of the observations. In the validation step, the estimates of water and protein masses from the half-carcass (R2 = 0.998 and 0.997; root mean square error of prediction [RMSEP], 1.0 and 0.5 kg, respectively) and 11th rib DXA scans (R2 = 0.997 and 0.996; RMSEP, 1.5 and 0.5 kg, respectively) were precise. Lipid mass was estimated precisely from the half-carcass DXA scan (R2 = 0.990; RMSEP = 1.0 kg) with a slightly lower precision from the 11th rib DXA scan (R2 = 0.968; RMSEP = 1.7 kg). Mineral mass was estimated from half-carcass (R² = 0.975 and RMSEP = 0.3 kg) and 11th rib DXA scans (R2 = 0.947 and RMSEP = 0.4 kg). For the energy content, the R2 values ranged from 0.989 (11th rib DXA scan) to 0.996 (half-carcass DXA scan), and the RMSEP ranged from 36 (half-carcass) to 55 MJ (11th rib). The proportions of water, lipids, and energy in the carcasses were also precisely estimated (R2 ≥ 0.882) using either the half-carcass (RMSEP ≤ 1.0%) or 11th rib-cut DXA scans (RMSEP ≤ 1.3%). Precision was lower for the protein and mineral proportions (R2 ≤ 0.794, RMSEP ≤ 0.5%). The cattle category (sex and breed of sire) effect was observed only in some estimative models for proportions from the 11th rib cut. In conclusion, DXA imaging of either a cold half-carcass or 11th rib cut is a precise method for estimating the chemical composition of carcasses from beef-on-dairy cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Xavier
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
- PEGASE INRAE-Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, 16 Le Clos, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Isabelle Morel
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yannick Le Cozler
- PEGASE INRAE-Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, 16 Le Clos, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Sylvain Lerch
- Ruminant Nutrition and Emissions, Agroscope, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Araújo J, Santos H, Ribeiro E, Trindade A, Sousa M, Nunes M, Lima A, Daher L, Silva A. Use of in vivo video image analysis as a substitute for manual biometric measurements on the prediction of qualitative and quantitative carcass characteristics of hair sheep lambs. Small Rumin Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
9
|
Caffarini JG, Bresolin T, Dorea JRR. Predicting ribeye area and circularity in live calves through 3D image analyses of body surface. J Anim Sci 2022; 100:skac242. [PMID: 35852484 PMCID: PMC9495505 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of sexed semen at dairy farms has improved heifer replacement over the last decade by allowing greater control over the number of retained females and enabling the selection of dams with superior genetics. Alternatively, beef semen can be used in genetically inferior dairy cows to produce crossbred (beef x dairy) animals that can be sold at a higher price. Although crossbreeding became profitable for dairy farmers, meat cuts from beef x dairy crosses often lack quality and shape uniformity. Technologies for quickly predicting carcass traits for animal grouping before harvest may improve meat cut uniformity in crossbred cattle. Our objective was to develop a deep learning approach for predicting ribeye area and circularity of live animals through 3D body surface images using two neural networks: 1) nested Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (nPSPNet) for extracting features and 2) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for estimating ribeye area and circularity from these features. A group of 56 calves were imaged using an Intel RealSense D435 camera. A total of 327 depth images were captured from 30 calves and labeled with masks outlining the calf body to train the nPSPNet for feature extraction. Additional 42,536 depth images were taken from the remaining 26 calves along with three ultrasound images collected for each calf from the 12/13th ribs. The ultrasound images (three by calf) were manually segmented to calculate the average ribeye area and circularity and then paired with the depth images for CNN training. We implemented a nested cross-validation approach, in which all images for one calf were removed (leave-one-out, LOO), and the remaining calves were further divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets within each LOO iteration. The proposed model predicted ribeye area with an average coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.74% and 7.3% mean absolute error of prediction (MAEP) and the ribeye circularity with an average R2 of 0.87% and 2.4% MAEP. Our results indicate that computer vision systems could be used to predict ribeye area and circularity in live animals, allowing optimal management decisions toward smart animal grouping in beef x dairy crosses and purebred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph G Caffarini
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53703, USA
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, –Madison, WI 53703, USA
| | - Tiago Bresolin
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, –Madison, WI 53703, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Camacho-Pérez E, Chay-Canul AJ, Garcia-Guendulain JM, Rodríguez-Abreo O. Towards the Estimation of Body Weight in Sheep Using Metaheuristic Algorithms from Biometric Parameters in Microsystems. MICROMACHINES 2022; 13:1325. [PMID: 36014248 PMCID: PMC9415317 DOI: 10.3390/mi13081325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The Body Weight (BW) of sheep is an important indicator for producers. Genetic management, nutrition, and health activities can benefit from weight monitoring. This article presents a polynomial model with an adjustable degree for estimating the weight of sheep from the biometric parameters of the animal. Computer vision tools were used to measure these parameters, obtaining a margin of error of less than 5%. A polynomial model is proposed after the parameters were obtained, where a coefficient and an unknown exponent go with each biometric variable. Two metaheuristic algorithms determine the values of these constants. The first is the most extended algorithm, the Genetic Algorithm (GA). Subsequently, the Cuckoo Search Algorithm (CSA) has a similar performance to the GA, which indicates that the value obtained by the GA is not a local optimum due to the poor parameter selection in the GA. The results show a Root-Mean-Squared Error (RMSE) of 7.68% for the GA and an RMSE of 7.55% for the CSA, proving the feasibility of the mathematical model for estimating the weight from biometric parameters. The proposed mathematical model, as well as the estimation of the biometric parameters can be easily adapted to an embedded microsystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Camacho-Pérez
- Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico Superior Progreso, Progreso 97320, Mexico
- Red de Investigación OAC Optimización, Automatización y Control, El Marques 76240, Mexico
| | - Alfonso Juventino Chay-Canul
- División Académica de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, km 25, Carretera Villahermosa-Teapa, R/A La Huasteca, Colonia Centro Tabasco 86280, Mexico
| | - Juan Manuel Garcia-Guendulain
- Red de Investigación OAC Optimización, Automatización y Control, El Marques 76240, Mexico
- Industrial Technologies Division, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marques 76240, Mexico
| | - Omar Rodríguez-Abreo
- Red de Investigación OAC Optimización, Automatización y Control, El Marques 76240, Mexico
- Industrial Technologies Division, Universidad Politécnica de Querétaro, El Marques 76240, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xavier C, Driesen C, Siegenthaler R, Dohme-Meier F, Le Cozler Y, Lerch S. Estimation of Empty Body and Carcass Chemical Composition of Lactating and Growing Cattle: Comparison of Imaging, Adipose Cellularity, and Rib Dissection Methods. Transl Anim Sci 2022; 6:txac066. [PMID: 35702177 PMCID: PMC9186311 DOI: 10.1093/tas/txac066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of present study was to compare in vivo and post mortem methods for estimating the empty body (EB) and carcass chemical compositions of Simmental lactating and growing cattle. Indirect methods were calibrated against the direct post mortem reference determination of chemical compositions of EB and carcass, determined after grinding and analyzing the water, lipid, protein, mineral masses, and energy content. The indirect methods applied to 12 lactating cows and 10 of their offspring were ultrasound (US), half-carcass and 11th rib dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, subcutaneous and perirenal adipose cell size (ACS), and dissection of the 11th rib. Additionally, three-dimensional (3D) images were captured for 8 cows. Multiple linear regressions with leave-one-out-cross-validations were tested between predictive variables derived from the methods tested, and the EB and carcass chemical compositions. Partial least square regressions were used to estimate body composition with morphological traits measured on 3D images. Body weight (BW) alone estimated the EB and carcass composition masses with a root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) for the EB from 1 kg for minerals to 12.4 kg for lipids, and for carcass from 0.9 kg for minerals to 7.8 kg for water. Subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness measured by US was the most accurate in vivo predictor when associated with BW to estimate chemical composition, with the EB lipid mass RMSEP = 11 kg and R2 = 0.75; carcass water mass RMSEP = 6 kg and R2 = 0.98; and carcass energy content RMSEP = 236 MJ and R2 = 0.91. Post mortem, carcass lipid mass was best estimated by half-carcass DXA scan (RMSEP = 2 kg, R2 = 0.98), 11th rib DXA scan (RMSEP = 3 kg, R2 = 0.96), 11th rib dissection (RMSEP = 4 kg, R2 = 0.92), and perirenal ACS (RMSEP = 6 kg, R2 = 0.79) in this respective order. The results obtained by 11th rib DXA scan were accurate and close to the half-carcass DXA scan with a reduction in scan time. Morphological traits from 3D images delivered promising estimations of the cow EB and carcass chemical component masses with an error less than 13 kg for the EB lipid mass and than 740 MJ for the EB energy. Future research is required to test the 3D imaging method on a larger number of animals to confirm and quantify its interest in estimating body composition in living animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Xavier
- Ruminants Research Group, Agroscope, Posieux, Switzerland
- PEGASE INRAE-Institut Agro, Le Clos, Saint Gilles, France
| | - Charlotte Driesen
- Ruminants Research Group, Agroscope, Posieux, Switzerland
- Empa, Laboratory for Advanced Analytical Technologies, Überlandstrasse, Dübendorf, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Siegenthaler
- Agroscope, Research Contracts Animals, Route de la Tioleyre, Posieux, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Sylvain Lerch
- Ruminants Research Group, Agroscope, Posieux, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xavier C, Le Cozler Y, Depuille L, Caillot A, Lebreton A, Allain C, Delouard J, Delattre L, Luginbuhl T, Faverdin P, Fischer A. The use of 3-dimensional imaging of Holstein cows to estimate body weight and monitor the composition of body weight change throughout lactation. J Dairy Sci 2022; 105:4508-4519. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-21337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
13
|
Greenwood PL. Review: An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase. Animal 2021; 15 Suppl 1:100295. [PMID: 34274250 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Beef is a high-quality source of protein that also can provide highly desirable eating experiences, and demand is increasing globally. Sustainability of beef industries requires high on-farm efficiency and productivity, and efficient value-chains that reward achievement of target-market specifications. These factors also contribute to reduced environmental and animal welfare impacts necessary for provenance and social licence to operate. This review provides an overview of beef industries, beef production, and beef production systems globally, including more productive and efficient industries, systems and practices. Extensive beef production systems typically include pasture-based cow-calf and stocker-backgrounding or grow-out systems, and pasture or feedlot finishing. Cattle in pasture-based systems are subject to high levels of environmental variation to which specific genotypes are better suited. Strategic nutritional supplementation can be provided within these systems to overcome deficiencies in the amount and quality of pasture- or forage-based feed for the breeding herd and for younger offspring prior to a finishing period. More intensive systems can maintain more control over nutrition and the environment and are more typically used for beef and veal from dairy breeds, crosses between beef and dairy breeds, and during finishing of beef cattle to assure product quality and specifications. Cull cows and heifers from beef seedstock and cow-calf operations and dairy enterprises that are mostly sent directly to abattoirs are also important in beef production. Beef production systems that use beef breeds should target appropriate genotypes and high productivity relative to maintenance for the breeding herd and for growing and finishing cattle. This maximizes income and limits input costs particularly feed costs which may be 60% or more of production costs. Digital and other technologies that enable rapid capture and use of environmental and cattle performance data, even within extensive systems, should enhance beef industry productivity, efficiency, animal welfare and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L Greenwood
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, Livestock Industries Centre, J.S.F. Barker Building, Trevenna Road, UNE Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Benos L, Tagarakis AC, Dolias G, Berruto R, Kateris D, Bochtis D. Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Updated Review. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 21:3758. [PMID: 34071553 PMCID: PMC8198852 DOI: 10.3390/s21113758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The digital transformation of agriculture has evolved various aspects of management into artificial intelligent systems for the sake of making value from the ever-increasing data originated from numerous sources. A subset of artificial intelligence, namely machine learning, has a considerable potential to handle numerous challenges in the establishment of knowledge-based farming systems. The present study aims at shedding light on machine learning in agriculture by thoroughly reviewing the recent scholarly literature based on keywords' combinations of "machine learning" along with "crop management", "water management", "soil management", and "livestock management", and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Only journal papers were considered eligible that were published within 2018-2020. The results indicated that this topic pertains to different disciplines that favour convergence research at the international level. Furthermore, crop management was observed to be at the centre of attention. A plethora of machine learning algorithms were used, with those belonging to Artificial Neural Networks being more efficient. In addition, maize and wheat as well as cattle and sheep were the most investigated crops and animals, respectively. Finally, a variety of sensors, attached on satellites and unmanned ground and aerial vehicles, have been utilized as a means of getting reliable input data for the data analyses. It is anticipated that this study will constitute a beneficial guide to all stakeholders towards enhancing awareness of the potential advantages of using machine learning in agriculture and contributing to a more systematic research on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lefteris Benos
- Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.B.); (A.C.T.); (G.D.); (D.K.)
| | - Aristotelis C. Tagarakis
- Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.B.); (A.C.T.); (G.D.); (D.K.)
| | - Georgios Dolias
- Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.B.); (A.C.T.); (G.D.); (D.K.)
| | - Remigio Berruto
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy;
| | - Dimitrios Kateris
- Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.B.); (A.C.T.); (G.D.); (D.K.)
| | - Dionysis Bochtis
- Centre of Research and Technology-Hellas (CERTH), Institute for Bio-Economy and Agri-Technology (IBO), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, GR 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece; (L.B.); (A.C.T.); (G.D.); (D.K.)
- FarmB Digital Agriculture P.C., Doiranis 17, GR 54639 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang Z, Shadpour S, Chan E, Rotondo V, Wood KM, Tulpan D. ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Applications of machine learning for livestock body weight prediction from digital images. J Anim Sci 2021; 99:6149204. [PMID: 33626149 PMCID: PMC7904040 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Monitoring, recording, and predicting livestock body weight (BW) allows for timely intervention in diets and health, greater efficiency in genetic selection, and identification of optimal times to market animals because animals that have already reached the point of slaughter represent a burden for the feedlot. There are currently two main approaches (direct and indirect) to measure the BW in livestock. Direct approaches include partial-weight or full-weight industrial scales placed in designated locations on large farms that measure passively or dynamically the weight of livestock. While these devices are very accurate, their acquisition, intended purpose and operation size, repeated calibration and maintenance costs associated with their placement in high-temperature variability, and corrosive environments are significant and beyond the affordability and sustainability limits of small and medium size farms and even of commercial operators. As a more affordable alternative to direct weighing approaches, indirect approaches have been developed based on observed or inferred relationships between biometric and morphometric measurements of livestock and their BW. Initial indirect approaches involved manual measurements of animals using measuring tapes and tubes and the use of regression equations able to correlate such measurements with BW. While such approaches have good BW prediction accuracies, they are time consuming, require trained and skilled farm laborers, and can be stressful for both animals and handlers especially when repeated daily. With the concomitant advancement of contactless electro-optical sensors (e.g., 2D, 3D, infrared cameras), computer vision (CV) technologies, and artificial intelligence fields such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), 2D and 3D images have started to be used as biometric and morphometric proxies for BW estimations. This manuscript provides a review of CV-based and ML/DL-based BW prediction methods and discusses their strengths, weaknesses, and industry applicability potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoyi Wang
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Saeed Shadpour
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Esther Chan
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vanessa Rotondo
- Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katharine M Wood
- Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dan Tulpan
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tedeschi LO, Greenwood PL, Halachmi I. Advancements in sensor technology and decision support intelligent tools to assist smart livestock farming. J Anim Sci 2021; 99:6129918. [PMID: 33550395 PMCID: PMC7896629 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring, modern data collection through sensors, rapid data transfer, and vast data storage through the Internet of Things (IoT) have advanced precision livestock farming (PLF) in the last 20 yr. PLF is relevant to many fields of livestock production, including aerial- and satellite-based measurement of pasture’s forage quantity and quality; body weight and composition and physiological assessments; on-animal devices to monitor location, activity, and behaviors in grazing and foraging environments; early detection of lameness and other diseases; milk yield and composition; reproductive measurements and calving diseases; and feed intake and greenhouse gas emissions, to name just a few. There are many possibilities to improve animal production through PLF, but the combination of PLF and computer modeling is necessary to facilitate on-farm applicability. Concept- or knowledge-driven (mechanistic) models are established on scientific knowledge, and they are based on the conceptualization of hypotheses about variable interrelationships. Artificial intelligence (AI), on the other hand, is a data-driven approach that can manipulate and represent the big data accumulated by sensors and IoT. Still, it cannot explicitly explain the underlying assumptions of the intrinsic relationships in the data core because it lacks the wisdom that confers understanding and principles. The lack of wisdom in AI is because everything revolves around numbers. The associations among the numbers are obtained through the “automatized” learning process of mathematical correlations and covariances, not through “human causation” and abstract conceptualization of physiological or production principles. AI starts with comparative analogies to establish concepts and provides memory for future comparisons. Then, the learning process evolves from seeking wisdom through the systematic use of reasoning. AI is a relatively novel concept in many science fields. It may well be “the missing link” to expedite the transition of the traditional maximizing output mentality to a more mindful purpose of optimizing production efficiency while alleviating resource allocation for production. The integration between concept- and data-driven modeling through parallel hybridization of mechanistic and AI models will yield a hybrid intelligent mechanistic model that, along with data collection through PLF, is paramount to transcend the current status of livestock production in achieving sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis O Tedeschi
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Paul L Greenwood
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, Armidale Livestock Industries Centre, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.,CSIRO Agriculture and Food, FD McMaster Research Laboratory Chiswick, Armidale, NSW, Australia
| | - Ilan Halachmi
- Laboratory for Precision Livestock Farming (PLF), Agricultural Research Organization - The Volcani Center, Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Rishon LeZion, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Greenwood PL. Prediction of dressing percentage, carcass characteristics and meat yield of goats, and implications for live assessment and carcass-grading systems. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.1071/an20160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Dressing percentage (DP) and meat yield (MY) predictions using live assessments and carcass measurements enable objective valuation of animals and their carcasses. We hypothesised that distribution of goat carcass tissues affects predictive value of live body condition scoring (CS) methods and carcass measurements for these traits.
Aims
The present paper aimed to assess the value of CS methods for prediction of DP and MY and of carcass measurements for prediction of MY.
Methods
Correlation and regression analyses from a dataset (n = 1014 goats) highly heterogeneous for factors influencing DP and MY were used to assess (1) the value of live-goat assessments and classifications, including five CS methods, age (dentition), liveweight (LW), sex, fleece characteristics and breed or genotype to predict DP and MY, and (2) the value of hot standard carcass weight (HSCW) and carcass GR (soft tissue over the 12th rib) tissue depth, eye-muscle depth and eye-muscle area to predict MY.
Key results
Among kids, LW accounted for 1% (residual standard deviation of 2.6%) of variation in DP, 22% (2.3%) in MY (% LW) and 34% (2.5%) in MY (% HSCW). LW plus the best CS method accounted for 24% (2.3%) of variation in DP, 58% (1.7%) in MY (% LW) and 61% (2.0%) in MY (% HSCW). Among all goats, LW plus CS accounted for up to 21% (3.2%), 39% (2.1%) and 45% (2.2%) of variation in these traits. Regression models that included age, sex, fleece type, breed or genotype, LW and CS accounted for 67% (2.5%), 72% (1.9%) and 72% (2.1%) of variation in DP, MY (% LW) and MY (% HSCW). Among carcass measurements, HSCW plus eye-muscle depth had best predictive value, accounting for 61% (2.3%) of variation in MY (% HSCW) for kids and 40% (2.9%) for all goats.
Conclusions
The body condition-score methods that best relate to DP and MY (% LW or % HSCW) assessed the shape of M. longissimus lumborum (eye muscle) in the lumbar region, which relates to muscularity of goats, rather than subcutaneous fat depth such as assessed at the GR-site.
Implications
The results guide potential targets for future developments in live-goat assessment, carcass classification and grading, and trading languages underpinned by value-based marketing.
Collapse
|