1
|
Gray P, Eriksson T, Skoglund L, Lagheden C, Hellström C, Pin E, Suomenrinne-Nordvik A, Pimenoff VN, Nilsson P, Dillner J, Lehtinen M. Seroepidemiological assessment of the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among 25 and 28 year-old adult women in Finland between March 2020-June 2022. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0305285. [PMID: 38990856 PMCID: PMC11238966 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Serological surveys of the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 are instrumental to understanding the course of the COVID-19 epidemic. We evaluate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among young adult Finnish females residing in 25 communities all over Finland from 2020 until 2022. METHODS Between 1st March 2020 and 30th June 2022, 3589 blood samples were collected from 3583 women born in 1992-95 when aged 25 or 28 years old attending the follow-up of an ongoing population-based trial of cervical screening strategies. The crude and population standardized SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was measured using nucleocapsid (induced by infection) and spike wild-type (WT) protein (induced both by infection and by vaccination) antigens over time and stratified by place of residence (inside or outside the Helsinki metropolitan region). RESULTS During 2020 (before vaccinations), spike-WT and nucleocapsid IgG antibodies followed each other closely, at very low levels (<5%). Spike-WT seropositivity increased rapidly concomitant with mass vaccinations in 2021 and reached 96.3% in the 2nd quartile of 2022. Antibodies to nucleocapsid IgG remained relatively infrequent throughput 2020-2021, increasing rapidly in the 1st and 2nd quartiles of 2022 (to 19.7% and 56.6% respectively). The nucleocapsid IgG seropositivity increased more profoundly in participants residing in the Helsinki metropolitan region (4.5%, 8.4% and 43.9% in 2020, 2021 and 2022 respectively) compared to those residing in communities outside the capital region (4.5%, 4.3% and 34.7%). CONCLUSIONS Low SARS-CoV-2 infection-related seroprevalence during 2020-2021 suggest a comparatively successful infection control. Antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 WT spike protein became extremely common among young women by the end of 2021, in line with the high uptake of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Finally, the rapid increase of seroprevalences to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein during the first and second quartile of 2022, imply a high incidence of infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants able to escape vaccine-induced protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Gray
- Center for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Lovisa Skoglund
- Division of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Camilla Lagheden
- Center for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ceke Hellström
- Division of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisa Pin
- Division of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Suomenrinne-Nordvik
- Center for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Infectious Disease Control and Vaccinations Unit, Department of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville N Pimenoff
- Center for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Biobank Borealis of Northern Finland, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Peter Nilsson
- Division of Affinity Proteomics Department of Protein Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SciLifeLab, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Joakim Dillner
- Center for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matti Lehtinen
- Center for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gualdi-Russo E, Zaccagni L. COVID-19 Vaccination and Predictive Factors in Immigrants to Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:350. [PMID: 38675733 PMCID: PMC11054178 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12040350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccination plays a pivotal role in the control of infectious disease outbreaks. Hesitancy/refusal of the vaccine by immigrants poses a serious threat to their and society's health. We reviewed studies regarding COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Europe by first-generation immigrants. A systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023432142), conducted until 31 October 2023 using Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, identified 295 potential articles. Of these, 16 conducted on 2,009,820 immigrants in nine European countries met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were of medium/high quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for observational studies. Factors that affected the uptake or hesitancy/refusal to vaccinate, with particular regard to gender, age, and country of origin, were examined. The meta-analysis of eight studies revealed that the pooled estimated prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in first-generation immigrants was 71.3% (95% CI: 70.0-72.5%), corresponding to 13.3% less than the host country population (95% CI: 10.2-16.4%). Limitations of included studies and this review were deeply discussed, highlighting the need for further research on the effect of acculturation on second-generation immigrants. European governments need to ensure equal availability of COVID-19 and other health-saving vaccines to all immigrants in the future by overcoming cultural barriers, building trust in institutions, and improving communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Gualdi-Russo
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Luciana Zaccagni
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
- Center for Exercise Science and Sports, University of Ferrara, 44123 Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lasander M, Elo K, Joronen K, Dub T. Barriers to vaccine acceptance in the adult population of mainland Finland, 2021. Epidemiol Infect 2024; 152:e54. [PMID: 38487840 PMCID: PMC11022264 DOI: 10.1017/s0950268824000463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
There has been a lack of information on vaccine acceptance for Finnish adults. We conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected through the Finnish Medicines Agency Medicine Barometer 2021 survey (response rate: 20.6%). We described and explained vaccine acceptance by investigating the associations between socio-demographic factors and statements using logistic regression and conducted a factor analysis. The majority of respondents (n = 2081) considered vaccines to be safe (93%), effective (97%), and important (95%). However, 20% and 14% felt they did not have enough information about vaccines and vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), respectively. Respondents aged 18-39 were 2.8 times more likely to disagree that they had enough information about VPDs compared to respondents aged 60-79 (p < 0.001), while respondents with poorer self-perceived health were 1.8 times more likely to declare not having enough information about vaccines (p < 0.001). We generated three-factor dimensions from the eight statements. They were related to 'Confidence and attitudes towards vaccines', 'Access to information on vaccines and VPDs', and 'Debate on vaccine issues', which may reflect the underlying thinking patterns. Access to and understanding of information about vaccines and VPDs need to be improved for Finnish adults to increase vaccine acceptance and uptake, thus preventing the spread of VPDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mervi Lasander
- Infection Disease Control and Vaccinations Unit, Department of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Kimmo Elo
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Parliamentary Studies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Katja Joronen
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Timothée Dub
- Infection Disease Control and Vaccinations Unit, Department of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burns R, Wyke S, Eyre MT, Boukari Y, Sørensen TB, Tsang C, Campbell CNJ, Beale S, Zenner D, Hargreaves S, Campos-Matos I, Harron K, Aldridge RW. COVID-19 vaccination coverage for half a million non-EU migrants and refugees in England. Nat Hum Behav 2024; 8:288-299. [PMID: 38049560 PMCID: PMC10896718 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01768-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite evidence suggesting that some migrants are at risk of under-immunization and have experienced severe health inequities during the pandemic, data are limited on migrants' COVID-19 vaccine coverage globally. Here we linked data from non-European Union migrants and resettled refugees to the national COVID-19 vaccination dataset in England. We estimated patterns in second and third dose delays and overdue doses between 12 December 2020 and 20 April 2022 by age, visa type and ethnicity. Of the 465,470 linked records, 91.8% (427,073/465,470) of migrants received a second dose and 51.3% (238,721/465,470) received a third. Refugees had the highest risk of delayed second (adjusted odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval 1.55-1.79) and third dose (1.55; 1.43-1.69). Black migrants were twice as likely to have a second dose delayed (2.37; 2.23-2.54) than white migrants, but this trend reversed for the third dose. Older migrants (>65 years) were four times less likely to have received their second or third dose compared with the general population in England aged >65 or older. Policymakers, researchers and practitioners should work to understand and address personal and structural barriers to vaccination for diverse migrant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Burns
- Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Sacha Wyke
- Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK
| | - Max T Eyre
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Yamina Boukari
- Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tina B Sørensen
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Camille Tsang
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Colin N J Campbell
- Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sarah Beale
- Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dominik Zenner
- Global Public Health Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Infection and Population Health Department, Institute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sally Hargreaves
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace London, London, UK
| | - Ines Campos-Matos
- Department of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Katie Harron
- UCL Great Ormond Street, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert W Aldridge
- Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wanigaratne S, Lu H, Gandhi S, Shetty J, Stukel TA, Piché-Renaud PP, Brandenberger J, Abdi S, Guttmann A. COVID-19 vaccine equity: a retrospective population-based cohort study examining primary series and first booster coverage among persons with a history of immigration and other residents of Ontario, Canada. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1232507. [PMID: 37744516 PMCID: PMC10515385 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1232507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Immigrants were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 and experience unique vaccination barriers. In Canada (37 million people), 23% of the population is foreign-born. Immigrants constitute 60% of the country's racialized (non-white) population and over half of immigrants reside in Ontario, the country's most populous province. Ontario had several strategies aimed at improving vaccine equity including geographic targeting of vaccine supply and clinics, as well as numerous community-led efforts. Our objectives were to (1) compare primary series vaccine coverage after it was widely available, and first booster coverage 6 months after its availability, between immigrants and other Ontario residents and (2) identify subgroups experiencing low coverage. Materials and methods Using linked immigration and health administrative data, we conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study including all community-dwelling adults in Ontario, Canada as of January 1, 2021. We compared primary series (two-dose) vaccine coverage by September 2021, and first booster (three-dose) coverage by March 2022 among immigrants and other Ontarians, and across sociodemographic and immigration characteristics. We used multivariable log-binomial regression to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRR). Results Of 11,844,221 adults, 22% were immigrants. By September 2021, 72.6% of immigrants received two doses (vs. 76.4%, other Ontarians) and by March 2022 46.1% received three doses (vs. 58.2%). Across characteristics, two-dose coverage was similar or slightly lower, while three-dose coverage was much lower, among immigrants compared to other Ontarians. Across neighborhood SARS-CoV-2 risk deciles, differences in two-dose coverage were smaller in higher risk deciles and larger in the lower risk deciles; with larger differences across all deciles for three-dose coverage. Compared to other Ontarians, immigrants from Central Africa had the lowest two-dose (aRR = 0.60 [95% CI 0.58-0.61]) and three-dose coverage (aRR = 0.36 [95% CI 0.34-0.37]) followed by Eastern Europeans and Caribbeans, while Southeast Asians were more likely to receive both doses. Compared to economic immigrants, resettled refugees and successful asylum-claimants had the lowest three-dose coverage (aRR = 0.68 [95% CI 0.68-0.68] and aRR = 0.78 [95% CI 0.77-0.78], respectively). Conclusion Two dose coverage was more equitable than 3. Differences by immigrant region of birth were substantial. Community-engaged approaches should be re-invigorated to close gaps and promote the bivalent booster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susitha Wanigaratne
- Edwin S.H. Leong Center for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Janavi Shetty
- Edwin S.H. Leong Center for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Therese A. Stukel
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Julia Brandenberger
- Edwin S.H. Leong Center for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Pediatric Emergency Department, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Astrid Guttmann
- Edwin S.H. Leong Center for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Pediatric Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|