1
|
Costa B, Gouveia MJ, Vale N. Safety and Efficacy of Antiviral Drugs and Vaccines in Pregnant Women: Insights from Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Integration of Viral Infection Dynamics. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:782. [PMID: 39066420 PMCID: PMC11281481 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12070782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Addressing the complexities of managing viral infections during pregnancy is essential for informed medical decision-making. This comprehensive review delves into the management of key viral infections impacting pregnant women, namely Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus/Hepatitis C Virus (HBV/HCV), Influenza, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). We evaluate the safety and efficacy profiles of antiviral treatments for each infection, while also exploring innovative avenues such as gene vaccines and their potential in mitigating viral threats during pregnancy. Additionally, the review examines strategies to overcome challenges, encompassing prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine research, regulatory considerations, and safety protocols. Utilizing advanced methodologies, including PBPK modeling, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and causal inference, we can amplify our comprehension and decision-making capabilities in this intricate domain. This narrative review aims to shed light on diverse approaches and ongoing advancements, this review aims to foster progress in antiviral therapy for pregnant women, improving maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Costa
- PerMed Research Group, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal;
- CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Parasite Biology and Immunology, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Health Institute Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Maria João Gouveia
- Centre for Parasite Biology and Immunology, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Health Institute Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 4000-055 Porto, Portugal;
- Center for the Study in Animal Science (CECA/ICETA), University of Porto, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Vale
- PerMed Research Group, Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal;
- CINTESIS@RISE, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma Y, Shan Z, Gu Y, Huang Y. Safety and efficacy of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in women vaccinated during the first trimester of pregnancy. Int J Infect Dis 2023; 130:196-202. [PMID: 36924838 PMCID: PMC10014124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the safety of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in early pregnant women in view of their adverse-effect profile and associated maternal-fetal complications, as well as to evaluate their immunogenicity. METHODS In this prospective observational cohort study, 232 women in their first trimester or those in the periconception period who inadvertently received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine between January 21, 2021, and January 14, 2022 were analyzed. Meanwhile, 735 unvaccinated early pregnancy women were also included in the study at a case-to-control ratio of 1:3. RESULTS The vaccination group did not have an increased miscarriage rate compared with that of the control group (P = 0.918). Furthermore, the birth defect rates in the vaccine group and control group were 0.83% and 1.0%, respectively. Vaccination did not increase the risk of small for gestational age, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm, or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (P >0.01). Within 12 weeks after the second dose, the inactivated vaccine effectively produced neutralizing antibody (NAb) against SARS-CoV-2. The NAb levels in the paired umbilical cord serum and maternal serum samples during delivery were negative in both groups. The T-cell subset remained within the normal range in both groups. CONCLUSION Therefore, our study proves that inactivated COVID-19 vaccines are safe for mothers and fetuses and also effective in producing NAb against SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Ma
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenli Shan
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yicun Gu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiying Huang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martinez-Sobrido L, Kobie JJ. Antibodies, B Cell Responses and Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infections. Antibodies (Basel) 2023; 12:12. [PMID: 36810517 PMCID: PMC9944790 DOI: 10.3390/antib12010012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronaviruses (CoV) are enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses responsible for causing seasonal, mild respiratory disease in humans [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James J. Kobie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Atyeo CG, Shook LL, Brigida S, De Guzman RM, Demidkin S, Muir C, Akinwunmi B, Baez AM, Sheehan ML, McSweeney E, Burns MD, Nayak R, Kumar MK, Patel CD, Fialkowski A, Cvrk D, Goldfarb IT, Yonker LM, Fasano A, Balazs AB, Elovitz MA, Gray KJ, Alter G, Edlow AG. Maternal immune response and placental antibody transfer after COVID-19 vaccination across trimester and platforms. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3571. [PMID: 35764643 PMCID: PMC9239994 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31169-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The availability of three COVID-19 vaccines in the United States provides an unprecedented opportunity to examine how vaccine platforms and timing of vaccination in pregnancy impact maternal and neonatal immunity. Here, we characterize the antibody profile after Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccination in 158 pregnant individuals and evaluate transplacental antibody transfer by profiling maternal and umbilical cord blood in 175 maternal-neonatal dyads. These analyses reveal lower vaccine-induced functions and Fc receptor-binding after Ad26.COV2.S compared to mRNA vaccination and subtle advantages in titer and function with mRNA-1273 versus BN162b2. mRNA vaccines have higher titers and functions against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. First and third trimester vaccination results in enhanced maternal antibody-dependent NK-cell activation, cellular and neutrophil phagocytosis, and complement deposition relative to second trimester. Higher transplacental transfer ratios following first and second trimester vaccination may reflect placental compensation for waning maternal titers. These results provide novel insight into the impact of platform and trimester of vaccination on maternal humoral immune response and transplacental antibody transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline G Atyeo
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- PhD Program in Virology, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lydia L Shook
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara Brigida
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rose M De Guzman
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stepan Demidkin
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cordelia Muir
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Babatunde Akinwunmi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arantxa Medina Baez
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Erin McSweeney
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Madeleine D Burns
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruhi Nayak
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maya K Kumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chinmay D Patel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison Fialkowski
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dana Cvrk
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ilona T Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lael M Yonker
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alessio Fasano
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Michal A Elovitz
- Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kathryn J Gray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Galit Alter
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Andrea G Edlow
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
CoronaVac vaccine is effective in preventing symptomatic and severe COVID-19 in pregnant women in Brazil: a test-negative case-control study. BMC Med 2022; 20:146. [PMID: 35379250 PMCID: PMC8979723 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02353-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More doses of CoronaVac have been administered worldwide than any other COVID-19 vaccine. However, the effectiveness of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines in pregnant women is still unknown. We estimated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of CoronaVac against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 in pregnant women in Brazil. METHODS We conducted a test-negative design study in all pregnant women aged 18-49 years with COVID-19-related symptoms in Brazil from March 15, 2021, to October 03, 2021, linking records of negative and positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests to national vaccination records. We also linked records of test-positive cases with notifications of severe, hospitalised or fatal COVID-19. Using logistic regression, we estimated the adjusted odds ratio and VE against symptomatic COVID-19 and against severe COVID-19 by comparing vaccine status in test-negative subjects to test-positive symptomatic cases and severe cases. RESULTS Of the 19,838 tested pregnant women, 7424 (37.4%) tested positive for COVID-19 and 588 (7.9%) had severe disease. Only 83% of pregnant women who received the first dose of CoronaVac completed the vaccination scheme. A single dose of the CoronaVac vaccine was not effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19. The effectiveness of two doses of CoronaVac was 41% (95% CI 27.1-52.2) against symptomatic COVID-19 and 85% (95% CI 59.5-94.8) against severe COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS A complete regimen of CoronaVac in pregnant women was effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 and highly effective against severe illness in a setting that combined high disease burden and marked COVID-19-related maternal deaths.
Collapse
|
6
|
Paganoti CDF, Rodrigues AS, Francisco RPV, da Costa RA. The Influenza Vaccine May Protect Pregnant and Postpartum Women against Severe COVID-19. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10020206. [PMID: 35214665 PMCID: PMC8875780 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed a huge challenge on the antenatal care of pregnant women worldwide, with the maternal mortality rate being raised to alarming levels. While COVID-19 vaccines were developed, some studies highlighted a possible relationship between influenza vaccination and lower odds of COVID-19 infection. As obstetric patients belong to a high-risk group for respiratory diseases, this study evaluated whether influenza vaccination reduces the severity of COVID-19 infection and mortality among pregnant and postpartum women. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 3370 pregnant and postpartum women from the Brazilian national database, where they were grouped according to their influenza vaccination status before the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. The intensive care unit admission and intubation rates were significantly higher among subjects in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The odds of mortality risk among those who received the vaccine was 0.33, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.23–0.47. The numbers of patients who needed to be vaccinated to avoid a case of intensive care unit admission, intubation, or death due to COVID-19 were 11, 15, and 11, respectively. Influenza vaccines could confer protection against severe COVID-19 infection in pregnant and postpartum women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiane de Freitas Paganoti
- Division of Clinical Obstetrics, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +55-11-2661-6209
| | | | - Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil;
| | - Rafaela Alkmin da Costa
- Division of Clinical Obstetrics, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shook LL, Fallah PN, Silberman JN, Edlow AG. COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy and Lactation: Current Research and Gaps in Understanding. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:735394. [PMID: 34604115 PMCID: PMC8481914 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.735394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the urgent need to develop vaccine strategies optimized for pregnant people and their newborns, as both populations are at risk of developing severe disease. Although not included in COVID-19 vaccine development trials, pregnant people have had access to these vaccines since their initial release in the US and abroad. The rapid development and distribution of novel COVID-19 vaccines to people at risk, including those who are pregnant and lactating, presents an unprecedented opportunity to further our understanding of vaccine-induced immunity in these populations. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature to date on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and lactation and highlight opportunities for investigation that may inform future maternal vaccine development and implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L. Shook
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Parisa N. Fallah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jason N. Silberman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea G. Edlow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Vincent Center for Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women with rheumatic diseases: an immunologic perspective. Rheumatol Int 2021; 41:1545-1547. [PMID: 34110465 PMCID: PMC8190165 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04918-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|