Multidisciplinary Treatment of Fracture-Related Infection Has a Positive Impact on Clinical Outcome-A Retrospective Case Control Study at a Tertiary Referral Center

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Infected Non-Unions: An Observational Study at an Infectious Disease Referral Centre

Objectives: The main aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of infected non-unions (INUs) managed at an Infectious Disease (ID) referral centre and to investigate the factors associated with treatment failure. Methods: This was an observational retrospective study on adult patients with INUs managed between 2012 and 2018 at the ID Unit of the IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, an Italian ID referral centre for bone and joint infections. Patients were observed for at least 24 months. Those who achieved clinical success were compared with those who experienced clinical failure; to identify factors associated with treatment failure, we performed a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 78 patients were included. A total of 57/78 (73%) were males; their median age was 43 (IQR 34-56) years; their median Charlson index was 0 (IQR 0-2); 32/78 (41%) reported a history of an open fracture; the non-union most frequently involved the leg. Polymicrobial infection was found in 23/78 cases (29%); the most common microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 47) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 35). At 24-month follow-up from index surgery, 16/78 patients had experienced clinical failure: 13 (16.6%) presented with persistence of local signs of infection and 3 (3.8%) had undergone amputation. Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for clinical failure identified body mass index (BMI) (aOR 1.15; 95% CI 1.03-1.28, p = 0.01) and MRSA infection (aOR 5.35; 95% CI 1.06-26.92, p = 0.04) as factors associated with clinical failure. Conclusions: Given that a standardized management of antibiotic therapy is initiated by an expert ID consultant team, BMI and MRSA infection are associated with worse outcomes among patients with INUs.

A Comparison of Causative Pathogens in Bone and Prosthetic Joint Infections: Implications for Antimicrobial Therapy

Background: The microbiological profile of bone and joint infections is important for determining the empiric choice of both systemic and local antimicrobial therapy. This study assessed whether there was a difference in the bacterial species that were isolated on culture in osteomyelitis (OM), fracture-related infection (FRI) or prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of patients who had surgical intervention for PJI or OM or FRI with a positive microbial culture between 2019 and 2022. Methods: Data including patient demographics, the site of injury, JS-BACH score, organism classification and antibiotic resistance to vancomycin and gentamicin were extracted from the medical records. Results: A total of 440 patients were included in this study: 163 patients with osteomyelitis, 109 with fracture-related infection with fixation implants and 168 with prosthetic joint infection. The patients with PJI were older, more likely to be female and had a higher BMI and ASA score compared to those with OM. Patients with PJI were more likely to have a higher JS-BACH score and more complex infections. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism in all three groups. It was more frequently isolated in osteomyelitis than in PJI (p = 0.016). In both osteomyelitis and FRI, after Staphylococcus aureus, the next most common organisms were Gram-negatives, whilst for PJIs, the most commonly isolated organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococci and then Streptococcus species. The rates of other organisms were broadly similar between the three groups. When adjusted for confounders, including symptom duration, JS-BACH score, the location of injury, age and BMI, there was no statistically significant difference in the presence of Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 0.765; 95% CI 0.633-1.232; p = 0.465) or polymicrobial infection (OR = 1.175; 95% CI 0.803-1.721; p = 0.407). Conclusions: Causative pathogens are similar across bone and joint infections and are independent of the presence of prosthetic material.

Traumatic Complete Loss of Knee Extensor Mechanism and Its Reconstruction With a Fresh-frozen Patellar Allograft With Patellar and Quadriceps Tendon

We report on an 18-year-old female who sustained complete loss of her knee extensor mechanism (patella, quadriceps and patellar tendon) due to a motorbike injury with severe soft tissue loss of the ventral aspect of the knee and subsequent infection. After infection control and successful latissimus dorsi free flap surgery, reconstruction of the knee extensor mechanism was performed using a fresh frozen extensor mechanism allograft with patella, quadriceps- and patellar tendon and integrated tibia tuberosity fragment. After a follow-up of 18 months, there was infection free integration of the allograft with a range of motion 0-0-90° (extension/flexion) and pain free gait.

The DAIR-procedure in fracture-related infection-When and how

This narrative review discusses treatment strategies and key considerations guiding decisions in the surgical management of fracture-related infections (FRI). Treatment options primarily revolve around two approaches: debridement antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), or implant exchange, either in a one or multiple-stage strategy. Several considerations, including time since infection onset, implant type, stability, causative pathogens, host physiology, and soft tissue conditions, inform the choice of surgical intervention for FRI. Current literature supports the preference for a DAIR approach in cases with a short duration of ongoing symptoms, a stable implant with satisfactory fracture reduction, and a viable soft tissue envelope. Conversely, one- or multiple-stage implant exchange is deemed beneficial in instances of compromised local and systemic host physiology, mature biofilm, difficult-to-treat pathogens, intramedullary implants, and cases involving reinfections or failed DAIR procedures. Notably, these recommendations draw parallels from periprosthetic joint infection treatment strategies, constrained by the limited availability of randomized controlled trials comparing these options specifically in acute FRI. In conclusion, future perspectives call for extensive investigations into biofilm maturation and the impact of time on treatment outcomes. Additionally, there is a need for a standardized classification system for FRI to enhance the comparability of treatment outcomes in FRI management.

Interprofessional interventions that impact collaboration and quality of care across inpatient trauma care continuum: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Despite the recognized importance of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in trauma care, healthcare professionals often work in silos. Interprofessional (IP) interventions are crucial for optimizing IPC and delivering high-quality care across clinical contexts, yet their effectiveness throughout the inpatient trauma care continuum is not well understood. Thus, this review aimed to examine the literature on the effectiveness of IP interventions on collaboration processes and related outcomes in inpatient trauma care.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. We searched six databases for studies from the last decade on IP interventions in inpatient trauma care. Two independent reviewers categorized IP interventions (education, practice, organization) and extracted their impact on IPC processes and related outcomes (team performance, patient, organization).

RESULTS

Of the 17,397 studies screened, 148 met the inclusion criteria. Most were cohort designs (72%), conducted in level I trauma centers (57%) and emergency departments (51%), and involved surgeons (56%) and nurses (53%). Studies focused on IP organization interventions (51%), such as clinical pathways; IP practice interventions (35%), such as trauma team activation protocols; and IP education interventions (14%) including multi-method education. IP practice interventions most effectively improved team performance results, while IP education interventions primarily improved IPC processes. Positive patient outcomes were limited, with few studies examining organizational effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant advancements are still required in IP interventions and trauma care research. Future studies should rigorously explore the effectiveness of interventions throughout the inpatient trauma care continuum and focus on developing robust measures for patient and organizational outcomes.

Recent advancements and future directions in fracture related infections: A scoping review

Fracture-related infections (FRIs) are complex challenges in orthopedic and trauma surgery, driving ongoing advancements in diagnostics, therapeutics, and management strategies. This scoping review examines recent progress and future directions in FRI management. Diagnostic enhancements encompass standardized definitions, improved biomarkers, advanced microbiological techniques, and innovative imaging modalities. Promising future diagnostics may include point-of-care testing, advanced imaging with enhanced specificity, and machine learning algorithms. Advancements in implant technology emphasize materials science, surface modifications, and personalized 3D printing, enhancing durability and antimicrobial efficacy. Immunomodulatory therapies targeting T cell dysfunction offer potential in addressing FRI chronicity. Enzybiotics and phages present promising alternatives to combat antibiotic resistance, with enzybiotics demonstrating effectiveness against biofilm-associated infections. Patient optimization, multidisciplinary approaches and specialized reference centers play vital roles in comprehensive FRI management, particularly crucial in resource-constrained settings. Collaboration and investment in research and technology are imperative for harnessing the full potential of these advancements and improving global FRI management outcomes. Addressing these complexities necessitates a multifaceted approach integrating clinical expertise, technological innovation, and global cooperation to optimize patient care and mitigate the burden of FRI worldwide.

Multidisciplinary Teams in Musculoskeletal Infection - From a Pathologist's Perspective

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings have emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of cancer patients. These meetings involve a team of healthcare professionals from different disciplines working together to develop a holistic, patient-centered treatment. Although MDT meetings are well established in oncology, they play a minor role in other diseases. Recent evidence suggests that the implementation of MDT meetings can improve patient outcomes in musculoskeletal infections. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to present the agenda of our multidisciplinary limb board including live microscopy with a special focus on the pathologist's role. The descriptive analysis of the limb board included 66 cases receiving live microscopy at the meeting and a total of 124 histopathological findings and 181 stainings. We could elucidate that pathologists seem to play an important role especially in clarifying the correct diagnosis. In 80.3 % of the findings, the pathologist specified the clinical diagnosis of the requesting physician leading to a consensus-based treatment plan for each patient. The implementation of MDT meetings including live microscopy in patients with musculoskeletal infections holds potential benefits, such as improved communication, scientific collaboration, and raising clinicians' awareness and understanding of histopathology findings. However, potential challenges, such as organizational effort and technical prerequisites should be considered.

Improving the Care of Severe, Open Fractures and Postoperative Infections of the Lower Extremities: Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Treatment Approach

BACKGROUND

Patients with open fractures often experience complications during their injury. The treatments incur high costs. Interdisciplinary cooperation between different medical disciplines may improve treatment outcomes. Such cooperation has not yet been envisaged in the German health care system.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to improve the treatment of fractures with open soft tissue damage or postoperative complications in terms of duration and sustainability in a region in northwest Germany. Largely standardized diagnostics and therapy are intended to optimize processes in hospitals. In addition, a reduction in the duration of treatment and treatment costs is to be achieved.

METHODS

Using a digital platform, physicians from 31 hospitals present patient cases to an interdisciplinary group of experts from the fields of plastic surgery, infectiology, hygiene, and others. The group of experts from the environment of the University Hospital Münster promptly makes a joint treatment recommendation for the individual case. The plan is to examine 3300 patients with open fractures or surgical complications. As consortium partners, there are also 3 statutory health insurance companies. The extent to which the therapy recommendations are effective and contribute to cost reduction in the health care system will be empirically investigated in a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. In addition, medical and nonmedical professional groups involved in the project will be asked about their work in the project (in total, 248 clinic employees). The primary outcome is the complication rate of open fractures or the occurrence of postoperative complications. As secondary outcomes, the number of antibiotics administered, limb function, and quality of life will be assessed. The health economic evaluation refers to the costs of health services and absenteeism. For the work-related evaluation, workload, work engagement, work-related resources, readiness for technology, and ergonomic aspects of the new telemedical technology will be collected. In addition, clinic employees will give their assessments of the success of the project in a structured telephone interview based on scaled and open-ended questions.

RESULTS

The project started in June 2022; data collection started in April 2023. As of mid-June 2024, data from 425 patients had been included. In total, 146 members of staff had taken part in the questionnaire survey and 15 had taken part in the interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized treatment pathways in the standard care of patients with open fractures and postoperative infections will be established to reduce complications, improve chances of recovery, and reduce costs. Unnecessary and redundant treatment steps will be avoided through standardized diagnostics and therapy. The interdisciplinary treatment perspective allows for a more individualized therapy. In the medium term, outpatient or inpatient treatment centers specialized in the patient group could be set up where the new diagnostic and therapeutic pathways could be competently applied.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031308; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00031308.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/57820.

[Reconstruction options for infection-related defects : Plastic surgery armamentarium]

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of infections has always been feared in all surgical disciplines. Plastic reconstructive surgery faces the challenge of treating infection-related defects on a patient-specific basis, which requires a multidisciplinary treatment concept. Satisfactory treatment success can only be achieved through radical debridement for infection cleansing, optimization of the perfusion situation paired with targeted anti-infective treatment and, if necessary, with soft tissue reconstruction by plastic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This article presents the current possibilities of plastic and reconstructive surgery with respect to the reconstruction of infection-related defects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Proven and reliable strategies are presented and supplemented by promising experimental approaches.

RESULTS

Due to the often multilayered defect situation caused by infections, from the epidermis to cancellous bone, the entire armamentarium of plastic and reconstructive surgery is used for reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

The early involvement of plastic surgery in the treatment of infections and the interdisciplinary and multimodal treatment approach have proven their worth in the treatment of complex infection situations.

Managing more than bones: the psychological impact of a recurrent fracture-related infection

Aims

Fracture-related infections (FRIs) are a devastating complication of fracture management. However, the impact of FRIs on mental health remains understudied. The aim of this study was a longitudinal evaluation of patients' psychological state, and expectations for recovery comparing patients with recurrent FRI to those with primary FRI.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted at a level 1 trauma centre from January 2020 to December 2022. In total, 56 patients treated for FRI were enrolled. The ICD-10 symptom rating (ISR) and an expectation questionnaire were assessed at five timepoints: preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and at three, six, and 12 months.

Results

Recurrent FRI cases consistently exceeded the symptom burden threshold (0.60) in ISR scores at all assessment points. The difference between preoperative-assessed total ISR scores and the 12-month follow-up was not significant in either group, with 0.04 for primary FRI (p = 0.807) and 0.01 for recurrent FRI (p = 0.768). While primary FRI patients showed decreased depression scores post surgery, recurrent FRI cases experienced an increase, reaching a peak at 12 months (1.92 vs 0.94; p < 0.001). Anxiety scores rose for both groups after surgery, notably higher in recurrent FRI cases (1.39 vs 1.02; p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with primary FRI reported lower expectations of returning to normal health at three (1.99 vs 1.11; p < 0.001) and 12 months (2.01 vs 1.33; p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The findings demonstrate the significant psychological burden experienced by individuals undergoing treatment for FRI, which is more severe in recurrent FRI. Understanding the psychological dimensions of recurrent FRIs is crucial for comprehensive patient care, and underscores the importance of integrating psychological support into the treatment paradigm for such cases.

Orthopedic infectious diseases: a survey on the composition and perceived value of an emerging subspecialty clinical service

We surveyed US orthopedic infectious disease (Ortho ID) specialists and surgeons ( n = 54 clinicians from at least 17 institutions). Three-quarters had a dedicated clinic or inpatient service; orthopedic device-related infections were most commonly seen. All respondents highly valued Ortho ID teams for improving multidisciplinary communication, trust, access to care, and outcomes.

[Modern concepts of interdisciplinary extremity reconstruction in open fractures]

The orthoplastic approach involves the collaboration of orthopedic/trauma surgeons, vascular surgeons and reconstructive microsurgeons. In cases of complex limb fractures, the aims are to optimize blood flow, restore bone stability, reconstruct soft tissue defects, and enhance function and sensitivity. The early administration of antibiotics and a timely, high-quality debridement after initial interdisciplinary assessment are carried out. This is followed by fracture stabilization and temporary wound coverage in order to plan the definitive interdisciplinary procedure. This includes definitive osteosynthesis and soft tissue reconstruction, using local tissue transfer if feasible, or free tissue transfer in cases of extensive trauma zones. The orthoplastic approach allows for faster definitive stabilization, fewer operations, shorter hospital stays, lower complication and revision rates, higher cost-effectiveness and improved long-term function.

Feasibility of using bacteriophage therapy to treat Staphylococcal aureus fracture-related infections

OBJECTIVE

Staphylococcus aureus fracture-related infections (FRIs) are associated with significant morbidity in part because conventional antibiotic therapies have limited ability to eradicate S. aureus in sessile states. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of using Staphylococcal bacteriophages for FRI by testing the activity of a library of Staphylococcal bacteriophage therapeutics against historically preserved S. aureus FRI clinical isolates.

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients with FRI from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. Preserved S. aureus FRI isolates from the cases were then tested against a library of 51 Staphylococcal bacteriophages from an American company. This was conducted by assessing the ability of bacteriophages to reduce bacterial growth over time. Growth inhibition greater than 16 h was considered adequate for this study.

RESULTS

All of the S. aureus preserved clinical isolates had at least one bacteriophage with robust lytic activity and six bacteriophages (11.8 %) had robust lytic activity to seven or more of the clinical isolates. However, 41 of the bacteriophages (80.4 %) had activity to less than three of the clinical isolates and no bacteriophage had activity to all the clinical isolates.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that Staphylococcal bacteriophage therapeutics are readily available for S. aureus FRI clinical isolates. However, when correlated with the current barriers to using bacteriophages to treat FRI, designated Staphylococcal bacteriophage cocktails with broad spectrum activity should be created.

Fracture-Related Infection-Epidemiology, Etiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a challenge to physicians and other workers in health care. In 2018, there were 7253 listed cases of FRI in Germany, corresponding to an incidence of 10.7 cases per 100 000 persons per year.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved from a search in PubMed with the search terms "fracture," "infection," "guideline," and "consensus." Aside from the primary literature, international guidelines and consensus recommendations were evaluated as well.

RESULTS

FRI arise mainly from bacterial contamination of the fracture site. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly detected pathogen. The treatment is based on surgery and antibiotics and should be agreed upon by an interdisciplinary team; it is often difficult because of biofilm formation. Treatment options include implant-preserving procedures and single-stage, two-stage, or multi-stage implant replacement. Treatment failure occurs in 10.3% to 21.4% of cases. The available evidence on the efficacy of various treatment approaches is derived mainly from retrospective cohort studies (level III evidence). Therefore, periprosthetic joint infections and FRI are often discussed together.

CONCLUSION

FRI presents an increasing challenge. Preventive measures should be optimized, and the treatment should always be decided upon by an interdisciplinary team. Only low-level evidence is available to date to guide diagnostic and treatment decisions. High-quality studies are therefore needed to help us meet this challenge more effectively.

The patients' perspective - a qualitative analysis of experiencing a fracture-related infection

Introduction

Fracture-related infection is a devastating complication confronting the patient with several challenges. To improve the management and to enhance the patients' wellbeing the focus of this study was to understand the emotional impact and patients' experiences during the process to identify challenges, difficulties, and resources. For this, a qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews according to Graneheim and Lundman was performed.

Methods

In total n = 20 patients of a German university orthopedic trauma centre specialized in bone and joint infections were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. The patients were treated at the hospital between 2019 and 2021 and underwent at least one surgery. Individual in-person interviews were performed by one researcher based on a semi-structured guide, which was previously conceptualized. Content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman was performed on the transcripts by two of the researchers independently.

Results

The following major themes emerged: (i) the emotional and mental aspects highlighting the fact that FRI patients faced severe restrictions in their day-to-day life, which resulted in dependency on others and frustration, as well as future concerns showing that patients could not overcome a state of anxiety and fear even after successful treatment, (ii) socioeconomic consequences confronting patients with consequences on the job and in finances where they often feel helpless, and (iii) resources emphasizing the role of spirituality as a coping strategy and yoga exercises for keeping the positivity.

Conclusion

This study emphasized the challenge of fracture-related infection management and associated consequences from the patients' perspective. Not being well informed about possible negative outcomes or restrictions makes it harder for patients to accept the situation and patients expressed a need for better information and certainty. Also, patients developed constant anxiety and other psychological disturbances, highlighting the potential benefit of psychological support and patient-peer support to exchange experiences.

Treatment of Fracture-Related Infections with Bone Abscess Formation after K-Wire Fixation of Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures in Adolescents—A Report of Two Clinical Cases

Closed reduction and K-wire fixation of displaced distal radius fractures in children and adolescents is an established and successful surgical procedure. Fracture-related infections after K-wire fixation are rare but can have significant consequences for the patient. There is a lack of literature on the treatment of K-wire-associated fracture-related infections in children and adolescents. Herein, we report two cases of fracture-related infection after initial closed reduction and Kirschner wire fixation in two adolescents. One 13-year-old boy and one 11-year-old girl were seen for fracture-related infections 4 and 8 weeks after closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation of a distal radius, respectively. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a healed fracture with osteolytic changes in the metaphyseal radius with periosteal reaction and abscess formation of the surrounding soft tissue structures. A two-staged procedure was performed with adequate debridement of the bone and dead space management with an antibiotic-loaded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) spacer at stage 1. After infection control, the spacer was removed and the defect was filled with autologous bone in one case and with a calcium sulphate–hydroxyapatite biomaterial in the other case. In each of the two patients, the infection was controlled and a stable consolidation of the distal radius in good alignment was achieved. In one case, the epiphyseal plate was impaired by the infection and premature closure of the epiphyseal plate was noted resulting in a post-infection ulna plus variant. In conclusion, a fracture-related infection after Kirschner wire fixation of pediatric distal radius fractures is a rare complication but can occur. A two-stage procedure with infection control and subsequent bone defect reconstruction was successful in the presented two cases. Premature closure of the epiphyseal growth plate of the distal radius is a potential complication.