Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on the Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients Treated with Biological Therapeutic Agents: A Case-Control Study

Extracellular Vesicle-Enclosed Oxidative Stress- and Inflammation-Related microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers of Vitamin D Responsivity: A Pilot Study on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with or without COVID-19

The relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels, genomic response to vitamin D (Vit.D), and positivity to SARS-CoV-2 remains understudied. In this pilot study, during the follow-up of patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and COVID-19, we investigated this issue by analyzing the molecular contents of serum extracellular vesicles (EVs) from six groups of IBD patients (n = 32), classified according to anti-SARS-CoV-2 status, 25(OH)D level, and Vit.D supplementation, by small RNA-seq. This analysis revealed differentially expressed miRNAs, PIWI-RNA, transfer RNA, small nucleolar RNAs, and protein-coding RNAs in the EVs obtained from these cohorts of IBD patients. Experimental validation evidenced a statistically significant increase in miR30d-5p, miR150-5p, Let-7f-5p, and Let-7a-5p in the anti-SARS-CoV-2-positive and low 25(OH)D and Vit.D supplemented groups with respect to the non-Vit.D supplemented group, indicating their responsiveness to Vit.D treatment. Bioinformatics analysis highlighted the regulation of these validated miRNAs by oxidative stress and inflammation, hallmarks of IBD and COVID-19. Our study reports an unprecedented panel of circulating EV-enclosed inflammation- and oxidative stress-related miRNAs, the potentiality of which, as biomarkers for Vit.D responsivity in IBD patients, needs to be explored in future studies on larger cohorts in order to allow clinicians to optimize current treatment strategies upon viral infection.

Ustekinumab safety and effectiveness in patients with ulcerative colitis: results from a large real-life study

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST) is an interleukin-12/interleukin-23 receptor antagonist recently approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC) but with limited real-world data. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of UST in patients with UC in a real-world setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. The primary endpoints were the clinical remission rate (partial Mayo score, PMS, ≤1) and the safety of UST. Other endpoints were corticosteroid-free remission (CSFR) rate, clinical response rate (PMS reduction of at least 2 points), and fecal calprotectin (FC) reduction at week 24.

RESULTS

We included 256 consecutive patients with UC (M/F 139/117, median age 52). The clinical remission and clinical response rates at eight weeks were 18.7% (44/235) and 53.2% (125/235), respectively, and 27.6% (42/152) and 61.8% (94/152) at 24 weeks, respectively. At 24 weeks, CSFR was 20.3% (31/152), and FC significantly dropped at week 12 (p = 0.0004) and 24 (p = 0.038). At eight weeks, patients naïve or with one previous biologic treatment showed higher remission (p = 0.002) and clinical >response rates (p = 0.018) than patients previously treated with ≥ 2. Adverse events occurred in six patients (2.3%), whereas four patients (1.6%) underwent colectomy.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study shows that UST effectively and safely treats patients with UC.

Editorial: Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) encompass ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), both of which are inflammatory ailments affecting the gastrointestinal tract [...].

COVID-19 Does Not Lead to an Increase in Corticosteroid Prescriptions in IBD Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

It is not known whether coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a trigger for disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In patients with IBD, we aimed to examine the association between COVID-19 infection and prescriptions of systemic and local corticosteroids (used as proxy for disease activity).

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study was based on Danish health registries and included all patients in Denmark with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) by the start of the pandemic (March 1, 2020) and who had a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test from March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022. We calculated rates of corticosteroid prescriptions 6 months before and 6 months after a positive COVID-19 PCR test, and we calculated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR).

RESULTS

We included 30,102 patients with IBD and a positive COVID-19 test (11,159 with CD, 18,493 with UC). The aIRR for having corticosteroid prescriptions after a COVID-19 positive test was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91). When we stratified for underlying disease, the aIRR for having corticosteroid after a COVID-19 positive test in UC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90), and in CD 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.02). Stratifications according to calendar periods and age groups showed consistent results.

CONCLUSIONS

An infection with COVID-19 did not result in a higher rate of filled corticosteroid prescriptions. Using corticosteroids as a proxy for disease activity, COVID-19 did not seem to trigger disease activity, which is a reassuring result for patients with IBD.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection does not worsen the course of inflammatory bowel disease in the long term

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is under investigation.

AIM

To assess, in a prospective study, whether a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection increases the risk of IBD relapse within 12 months.

METHODS

From March to April 2021, all IBD patients with recent (<2 months) SARS-CoV-2 infection (Cases) were enrolled. For each enrolled Case, four IBD Controls with no history of infection were considered. Clinical course of IBD was recorded for 12 months. Inclusion criteria: well defined diagnosis of IBD; age ≥18 and ≤85 years; 12-month follow-up; consent. Exclusion criteria: incomplete data; SARS-CoV-2 infection after enrollment. Additional inclusion criteria: recent SARS-CoV-2 infection for Cases; no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection for Controls. Data expressed as median [range]. Statistical analysis: Student-t-Test, Mann-Whitney U-test, χ2 test, multivariate logistic regression model [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)], Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-three IBD patients were enrolled. The analysis included 118 patients (22 met the exclusion criteria, three lost at follow-up): 29 (24.6%) Cases and 89 (75.4%) Controls. Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. During the 12-month study, the frequency of IBD relapse was comparable between Cases and Controls [8 (27%) vs 19 (21%); P = 0.65]. At univariate analysis, SARS-CoV-2 infection was not a risk factor for IBD relapse within 12 months [1.5 (0.6-3.9); P = 0.34]. At multivariate analysis, IBD activity at baseline was the only risk factor for relapse [3.2 (1.1-9.1); P = 0.03]. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that survival from IBD relapse was comparable between Cases and Controls (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

In a prospective 12-month study, a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection did not increase the risk of clinical relapse of IBD in the long term.

Real-world efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in managing ulcerative colitis versus Crohn's disease: results from an Italian multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ) can be used to treat refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We assessed whether there are differences in treating UC vs CD with VDZ.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

 Mayo score in UC and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) in CD scored the clinical activity. Achievement and maintenance of clinical remission during the follow-up, and safety were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

729 patients (475 with UC and 254 with CD), median follow-up of 18 (IQR 6-36) months, were enrolled. Clinical remission at the 6^th month of treatment was achieved in 488 (66.9%) patients (74.4% in CD vs 62.9% in UC, p<0.002) while, during the follow-up, no difference was found (81.5% in the UC group and 81.5% pts in the CD group; p=0.537). The clinical remission at the 6^th month of treatment (p=0.001) and being naïve to biologics (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with prolonged clinical remission. The clinical response was significantly higher in UC (90.1%) vs CD (84.3%) (p=0.023), and surgery occurred more frequently in CD (1.9% in UC vs 5.1% in CD, p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

We found differences when using VDZ in UC vs CD in real life. These parameters can help the physician predict this drug's longterm efficacy.

Gisbert J, Mesonero F, Benítez O, Taxonera C, Ponferrada-Díaz Á, Piqueras M, J. Lucendo A, Caballol B, Mañosa M, Martínez-Montiel P, Bosca-Watts M, Gordillo J, Bujanda L, Manceñido N, Martínez-Pérez T, López A, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez C, García-López S, Vega P, Rivero M, Melcarne L, Calvo M, Iborra M, Barreiro de Acosta M, Sicilia B, Barrio J, Pérez Calle JL, Busquets D, Pérez-Martínez I, Navarro-Llavat M, Hernández V, Argüelles-Arias F, Ramírez Esteso F, Meijide S, Ramos L, Gomollón F, Muñoz F, Suris G, Ortiz de Zarate J, Huguet JM, Llaó J, García-Sepulcre MF, Sierra M, Durà M, Estrecha S, Fuentes Coronel A, Hinojosa E, Olivan L, Iglesias E, Gutiérrez A, Varela P, Rull N, Gilabert P, Hernández-Camba A, Brotons A, Ginard D, Sesé E, Carpio D, Aceituno M, Cabriada JL, González-Lama Y, Jiménez L, Chaparro M, López-San Román A, Alba C, Plaza-Santos R, Mena R, Tamarit-Sebastián S, Ricart E, Calafat M, Olivares S, Navarro P, Bertoletti F, Alonso-Galán H, Pajares R, Olcina P, Manzano P, Domènech E, Esteve M. Risk Factors for COVID-19 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A National, ENEIDA-Based Case-Control Study (COVID-19-EII)

(1) Scant information is available concerning the characteristics that may favour the acquisition of COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess these differences between infected and noninfected patients with IBD. (2) This nationwide case−control study evaluated patients with inflammatory bowel disease with COVID-19 (cases) and without COVID-19 (controls) during the period March−July 2020 included in the ENEIDA of GETECCU. (3) A total of 496 cases and 964 controls from 73 Spanish centres were included. No differences were found in the basal characteristics between cases and controls. Cases had higher comorbidity Charlson scores (24% vs. 19%; p = 0.02) and occupational risk (28% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) more frequently than did controls. Lockdown was the only protective measure against COVID-19 (50% vs. 70%; p < 0.0001). No differences were found in the use of systemic steroids, immunosuppressants or biologics between cases and controls. Cases were more often treated with 5-aminosalicylates (42% vs. 34%; p = 0.003). Having a moderate Charlson score (OR: 2.7; 95%CI: 1.3−5.9), occupational risk (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.8−4.4) and the use of 5-aminosalicylates (OR: 1.7; 95%CI: 1.2−2.5) were factors for COVID-19. The strict lockdown was the only protective factor (OR: 0.1; 95%CI: 0.09−0.2). (4) Comorbidities and occupational exposure are the most relevant factors for COVID-19 in patients with IBD. The risk of COVID-19 seems not to be increased by immunosuppressants or biologics, with a potential effect of 5-aminosalicylates, which should be investigated further and interpreted with caution.