1
|
Hua T, Fan R, Fan Y, Chen F. Immune response of COVID-19 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2357424. [PMID: 38785118 PMCID: PMC11135846 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2357424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Solid cancer patients, compared to their healthy counterparts, are at a greater risk of contracting and suffering from severe complications and poorer prognosis after COVID-19 infections. They also have different immune responses after doses of COVID-19 vaccination, but limited evidence is available to reveal the effectiveness and help to guide immunization programs for this subpopulation; MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and clinicaltrials.gov were used to search literature. The pooled seroconversion rate was calculated using a random-effects model and reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI); The review includes 66 studies containing serological responses after COVID-19 vaccination in 13,050 solid cancer patients and 8550 healthy controls. The pooled seropositive rates after the first dose in patients with solid cancer and healthy controls are 55.2% (95% CI 45.9%-64.5% N = 18) and 90.2% (95% CI 80.9%-96.6% N = 13), respectively. The seropositive rates after the second dose in patients with solid cancer and healthy controls are 87.6% (95% CI 84.1%-90.7% N = 50) and 98.9% (95% CI 97.6%-99.7% N = 35), respectively. The seropositive rates after the third dose in patients with solid cancer and healthy controls are 91.4% (95% CI 85.4%-95.9% N = 21) and 99.8% (95% CI 98.1%-100.0% N = 4), respectively. Subgroup analysis finds that study sample size, timing of antibody testing, and vaccine type have influence on the results; Seroconversion rates after COVID-19 vaccination are significantly lower in patients with solid malignancies, especially after the first dose, then shrinking gradually after the following two vaccinations, indicating that subsequent doses or a booster dose should be considered for the effectiveness of this subpopulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiantian Hua
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ru Fan
- Medical Statistics and Analysis Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Yang Fan
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gangaev A, van Sleen Y, Brandhorst N, Hoefakker K, Prajapati B, Singh A, Boerma A, van der Heiden M, Oosting SF, van der Veldt AAM, Hiltermann TJN, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Dingemans AMC, Smit EF, de Vries EGE, Haanen JBAG, Kvistborg P, van Baarle D. mRNA-1273 vaccination induces polyfunctional memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in patients with solid cancers undergoing immunotherapy or/and chemotherapy. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1447555. [PMID: 39257577 PMCID: PMC11385311 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1447555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Research has confirmed the safety and comparable seroconversion rates following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with solid cancers. However, the impact of cancer treatment on vaccine-induced T cell responses remains poorly understood. Methods In this study, we expand on previous findings within the VOICE trial by evaluating the functional and phenotypic composition of mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses in patients with solid tumors undergoing immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or both, compared to individuals without cancer. We conducted an ELISpot analysis on 386 participants to assess spike-specific T cell responses 28 days after full vaccination. Further in-depth characterization of using flow cytometry was performed on a subset of 63 participants to analyze the functional phenotype and differentiation state of spike-specific T cell responses. Results ELISpot analysis showed robust induction of spike-specific T cell responses across all treatment groups, with response rates ranging from 75% to 80%. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a distinctive cytokine production pattern across cohorts, with CD4 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2, and CD8 T cells producing IFNγ, TNF, and CCL4. Variations were observed in the proportion of monofunctional CD4 T cells producing TNF, particularly higher in individuals without cancer and patients treated with chemotherapy alone, while those treated with immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy predominantly produced IFNγ. Despite these differences, polyfunctional spike-specific memory CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were comparable across cohorts. Notably, immunotherapy-treated patients exhibited an expansion of spike-specific CD4 T cells with a terminally differentiated effector memory phenotype. Discussion These findings demonstrate that systemic treatment in patients with solid tumors does not compromise the quality of polyfunctional mRNA-1273-induced T cell responses. This underscores the importance of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancers undergoing systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Gangaev
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yannick van Sleen
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Nicole Brandhorst
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kelly Hoefakker
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bimal Prajapati
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Amrita Singh
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Boerma
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marieke van der Heiden
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center (MC)-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - T Jeroen N Hiltermann
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Corine H GeurtsvanKessel
- Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center (MC) Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Egbert F Smit
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - John B A G Haanen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pia Kvistborg
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Debbie van Baarle
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee HE, Jeong NY, Park M, Lim E, Kim JA, Won H, Kim CJ, Park SM, Choi NK. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against severe outcomes in cancer patients: Real-world evidence from self-controlled risk interval and retrospective cohort studies. J Infect Public Health 2024; 17:854-861. [PMID: 38554591 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines is generally reduced in cancer patients compared to the general population. However, there are only a few studies that compare the relative risk of breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 outcomes in fully vaccinated cancer patients versus their unvaccinated counterparts. METHODS To assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients, we employed (1) a self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) design, and (2) a retrospective matched cohort design. A SCRI design was used to compare the risk of breakthrough infection in vaccinated cancer patients during the period immediately following vaccination ("control window") and the period in which immunity is achieved ("exposure windows"). The retrospective matched cohort design was used to compare the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated cancer patients. For both studies, data were extracted from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency-COVID-19-National Health Insurance Service cohort, including demographics, medical history, and vaccination records of all individuals confirmed with COVID-19. We used conditional Poisson regression to calculate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for breakthrough infection and Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for severe outcomes. RESULTS Of 14,448 cancer patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between October 2020 and December 2021, a total of 217 and 3996 cancer patients were included in the SCRI and cohort study respectively. While the risk of breakthrough infections, measured by the incidence rate in the control and exposure windows, did not show statistically significant difference in vaccinated cancer patients (IRR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.64-1.22), the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes was significantly lower in vaccinated cancer patients compared to those unvaccinated (HR=0.27, 95% CI: 0.22-0.34). CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce the risk of severe outcomes in cancer patients, though their efficacy against breakthrough infections is less evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Eon Lee
- Graduate School of Industrial Pharmaceutical Science, College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760 Republic of Korea
| | - Na-Young Jeong
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Minah Park
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunsun Lim
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Ah Kim
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Heehyun Won
- Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| | - Chung-Jong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, 260, Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Min Park
- Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Nam-Kyong Choi
- Graduate School of Industrial Pharmaceutical Science, College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760 Republic of Korea; Department of Health Convergence, College of Science and Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Y, Chen D, Pan Y, Li H, Zhao W, Lu T, Kong W, Ding M, Wang X, Zhang G. Serological response and immune-related adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol 2024; 34:e2495. [PMID: 38017632 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
With the popularity of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and the development of vaccination strategies, the impact of COVID-19 vaccine on cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still unclear. In the systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with ICIs, we assessed the serological response of cancer patients receiving COVID-19 vaccine, and explored the risk of immune related adverse events (irAEs). We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library as of 10 June 2023, and included cancer patients who received ICIs and COVID-19 vaccine. The systematic review and meta-analysis include cohort study, cross-sectional study and case report. The outcome included the serological response, Spike-specific T-cell response, irAEs and rare adverse events. When possible, the data were analysed by random effect analysis, and the statistical heterogeneity was assessed by Q-test and I2 statistics. We explored the sources of heterogeneity through L'Abbe plots, Galbraith radial plots, and sensitivity analysis. The publication bias was evaluated by Egger's, Begg's linear regression test and funnel plot, and the impact of publication bias was further analysed by trim and fill method. 27 studies were eligible (19 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study and 7 case reports), involving 8331 patients (with 4724 receiving ICIs). Most studies used mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273). Compared with cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, cancer patients receiving ICIs were significantly more likely to have seroconversion (RR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.10, P = 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in seroconversion rates when comparing cancer patients receiving ICIs with controls without cancer (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.01, P = 0.09) or with cancer patients receiving targeted therapy (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.39, P = 0.75). The incidence of irAEs in patients receiving ICIs before and after COVID-19 vaccination was (21.96%, 95%CI 16.66%-28.94%) and (14.88%, 95%CI 8.65%-25.57%), respectively. The most common irAEs were endocrine abnormalities, skin disorders, etc. The certainty of evidence was low in cancer patients with ICIs, compared with those receiving chemotherapy, and very low versus controls without cancer. Cancer patients treated with ICIs seem to be able to receive COVID-19 vaccine safely without increasing the incidence of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Wang
- School of Graduates, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuancan Pan
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Haiming Li
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Weizhe Zhao
- School of Graduates, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Taicheng Lu
- School of Graduates, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Weijia Kong
- School of Graduates, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Min Ding
- NHC Key Laboratory of Hormones and Development, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Metabolic Diseases, Chu Hsien-I Memorial Hospital & Tianjin Institute of Endocrinology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ganlin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pietroluongo E, De Placido P, Tortora M, Martinelli C, Viggiano A, Saponaro MR, Caltavituro A, Buonaiuto R, Morra R, Ottaviano M, Del Deo V, Cernera G, Gelzo M, Malfitano AM, Di Tolla MF, De Angelis C, Arpino G, Terracciano D, Bianco R, Veneziani BM, Formisano P, Castaldo G, Palmieri G, De Placido S, Giuliano M. Impaired Seroconversion After Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 mRNA Vaccine in Patients With Thymic Epithelial Tumors. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:1399-1407. [PMID: 37390981 PMCID: PMC10303630 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies associated with dysregulation of the immune system and humoral- and cell-mediated immunity abnormalities. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine is effective in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the seroconversion in patients with TET after two doses of mRNA vaccine. METHODS This is a prospective study in which consecutive patients with TET were enrolled before receiving the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech). SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibody serologic levels were analyzed at different time points, including before first vaccine dose (T0), 1 month after the second dose (T2), and 3 months after the second dose (T3). RESULTS Overall, 39 patients were included in the analysis. All patients had negative antibody titer results at T0. There were 19 patients (48.7%) in the follow-up with no residual tumor lesion/s (referred as no evidence of disease), and 20 (51.3%) had evidence of disease (ED) and were receiving systemic treatment. Dysregulations of the immune system were diagnosed in 29 patients (74.4%) with Good syndrome (GS) being the most frequent immune disorder (48.7%). At univariate analysis, lack of seroconversion at T2 was significantly associated with ED (p < 0.001) and with GS (p = 0.043). A significant association with impaired seroconversion was confirmed at multivariate analysis for ED (p = 0.00101) but not for GS (p = 0.625). CONCLUSIONS Our data revealed that patients with TET with ED had substantially higher probability of impaired seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine as compared with patients with no evidence of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Pietroluongo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marianna Tortora
- Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region (CRCTR), Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Martinelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Angela Viggiano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Aldo Caltavituro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Buonaiuto
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Rocco Morra
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Margaret Ottaviano
- Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region (CRCTR), Naples, Italy; Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Italian National Cancer Institute- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | - Vitantonio Del Deo
- Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region (CRCTR), Naples, Italy
| | - Gustavo Cernera
- CEINGE, Biotecnologie Avanzate, Naples, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Monica Gelzo
- CEINGE, Biotecnologie Avanzate, Naples, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Malfitano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | | | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Grazia Arpino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Bianco
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Bianca Maria Veneziani
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Formisano
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Castaldo
- CEINGE, Biotecnologie Avanzate, Naples, Italy; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy; Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region (CRCTR), Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Giuliano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy; Rare Tumors Coordinating Center of Campania Region (CRCTR), Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agbarya A, Sarel I, Ziv-Baran T, Schwartz O, Shechtman Y, Kozlener E, Khoury R, Sheikh-Ahmad M, Saiegh L, Swaid F, Ahmad AA, Janzic U, Brenner R. Response Rate of the Third and Fourth Doses of the BNT162b2 Vaccine Administered to Cancer Patients Undergoing Active Anti-Neoplastic Treatments. Diseases 2023; 11:128. [PMID: 37873772 PMCID: PMC10594524 DOI: 10.3390/diseases11040128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The BNT162b2 vaccine is globally used for preventing morbidity and mortality related to COVID-19. Cancer patients have had priority for receiving the vaccine due to their diminished immunity. This study reports the response rate of administering the third and fourth vaccine doses to cancer patients receiving active anti-neoplastic treatment. A total of 142 patients received two doses of the mRNA-based BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine, while 76 and 25 patients received three and four doses, respectively. The efficacy of the humoral response following two vaccine doses was diminished in cancer patients, especially in the group of patients receiving chemotherapy. In a multivariate analysis, patients who received three and four BNT162b2 vaccine doses were more likely to have antibody titers in the upper tertile compared to patients who received two doses of the vaccine (odds ratio (OR) 7.62 (95% CI 1.38-42.12), p = 0.02 and 17.15 (95% CI 5.01-58.7), p < 0.01, respectively). Unlike the response after two doses, the third and fourth BNT162b2 vaccine booster doses had an increased efficacy of 95-100% in cancer patients while undergoing active treatment. This result could be explained by different mechanisms including the development of memory B cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abed Agbarya
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3109601, Israel
| | - Ina Sarel
- Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Holon 5822012, Israel;
| | - Tomer Ziv-Baran
- School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel;
| | - Orna Schwartz
- Microbiology and Immunology Laboratory, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon 5822012, Israel;
| | - Yelena Shechtman
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Ella Kozlener
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Rasha Khoury
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Mohammad Sheikh-Ahmad
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Leonard Saiegh
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Forat Swaid
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Asala Abu Ahmad
- Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Haifa 3339419, Israel; (Y.S.); (E.K.); (R.K.); (M.S.-A.); (L.S.); (F.S.); (A.A.A.)
| | - Urska Janzic
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Clinic Golnik, 4202 Golnik, Slovenia;
| | - Ronen Brenner
- Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Oncology Institute, Holon 5822012, Israel;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan WC, Tan JYJ, Lim JSJ, Tan RYC, Lee ARYB, Leong FL, Lee SC, Chai LYA, Tan TT, Malek MIBA, Ong B, Lye DC, Chiew CJ, Chng WJ, Lim ST, Bharwani LD, Tan IB, Sundar R, Tan KB. COVID-19 Severity and Waning Immunity After up to 4 mRNA Vaccine Doses in 73 608 Patients With Cancer and 621 475 Matched Controls in Singapore: A Nationwide Cohort Study. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1221-1229. [PMID: 37440245 PMCID: PMC10346511 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Importance Despite patients with cancer being at risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19, there are few published studies for vaccine efficacy in this group, with suboptimal immunogenicity and waning vaccine efficacy described in small studies being a concern. Objective To assess the incidence rate of severe COVID-19 disease outcomes associated with the number of vaccine doses received and the waning of protection over time. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective multicenter observational cohort study was carried out over 2 time periods (September 15, 2021, to December 20, 2021 [delta wave], and January 20, 2022, to November 11, 2022 [omicron wave]) predominated by SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants, respectively. Overall, 73 608 patients with cancer (23 217 active treatment, 50 391 cancer survivors) and 621 475 controls matched by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were included. Exposure Vaccine doses received, from zero to 4 doses, and time elapsed since last vaccine dose. Outcomes Competing-risk regression analyses were employed to account for competing risks of death in patients with cancer. Main outcomes were incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and severe disease (defined as requirement for supplemental oxygen, intensive care, or death). The IRRs stratified by time from last vaccine dose served as indicators of waning of vaccine effectiveness over time. Results The mean (SD) age of actively treated patients with cancer, cancer survivors, and controls were 62.7 (14.7), 62.9 (12.6), and 61.8 (14.7) years, respectively. Of 73 608 patients with cancer, 27 170 (36.9%) were men; 60 100 (81.6%) were Chinese, 7432 (10.1%) Malay, 4597 (6.2%) Indian, and 1479 (2.0%) were of other races and ethnicities. The IRRs for the 3-dose and 4-dose vs the 2-dose group (reference) for COVID-19 hospitalization and severe disease were significantly lower during both the delta and omicron waves in cancer and control populations. The IRRs for severe disease in the 3-dose group for active treatment, cancer survivors, and controls were 0.14, 0.13, and 0.07 during the delta wave and 0.29, 0.19, and 0.21 during omicron wave, respectively. The IRRs for severe disease in the 4-dose group during the omicron wave were even lower at 0.13, 0.10 and 0.10, respectively. No waning of vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization and severe disease was seen beyond 5 months after a third dose, nor up to 5 months (the end of this study's follow-up) after a fourth dose. Conclusion This cohort study provides evidence of the clinical effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccines against COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Longevity of immunity in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in actively treated patients with cancer, cancer survivors, and matched controls was observed at least 5 months after the third or fourth dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Chong Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Joline Si Jing Lim
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore
- Experimental Therapeutics Programme, Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Ying Cong Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Fun Loon Leong
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore
- Experimental Therapeutics Programme, Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Louis Yi Ann Chai
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Thuan Tong Tan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Benjamin Ong
- Ministry of Health, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - David Chien Lye
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Calvin J. Chiew
- Ministry of Health, Singapore
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore
| | - Wee Joo Chng
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore
- Experimental Therapeutics Programme, Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soon Thye Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Iain Beehuat Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raghav Sundar
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Gastric Cancer Consortium, Singapore
| | - Kelvin Bryan Tan
- Ministry of Health, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Martin P, Tsourti Z, Ribeiro J, Castelo-Branco L, de Azambuja E, Gennatas S, Rogado J, Sekacheva M, Šušnjar S, Viñal D, Lee R, Khallaf S, Dimopoulou G, Pradervand S, Whisenant J, Choueiri TK, Arnold D, Harrington K, Punie K, Oliveira J, Michielin O, Dafni U, Peters S, Pentheroudakis G, Romano E. COVID-19 in cancer patients: update from the joint analysis of the ESMO-CoCARE, BSMO, and PSMO international databases. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101566. [PMID: 37285719 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 has significantly affected patients with cancer and revealed unanticipated challenges in securing optimal cancer care across different disciplines. The European Society for Medical Oncology COVID-19 and CAncer REgistry (ESMO-CoCARE) is an international, real-world database, collecting data on the natural history, management, and outcomes of patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS This is the 2nd CoCARE analysis, jointly with Belgian (Belgian Society of Medical Oncology, BSMO) and Portuguese (Portuguese Society of Medical Oncology, PSMO) registries, with data from January 2020 to December 2021. The aim is to identify significant prognostic factors for COVID-19 hospitalization and mortality (primary outcomes), as well as intensive care unit admission and overall survival (OS) (secondary outcomes). Subgroup analyses by pandemic phase and vaccination status were carried out. RESULTS The cohort includes 3294 patients (CoCARE: 2049; BSMO: 928, all hospitalized by eligibility criteria; PSMO: 317), diagnosed in four distinct pandemic phases (January to May 2020: 36%; June to September 2020: 9%; October 2020 to February 2021: 41%; March to December 2021: 12%). COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 54% (CoCARE/PSMO), ICU admission 14%, and COVID-19 mortality 22% (all data). At a 6-month median follow-up, 1013 deaths were recorded with 73% 3-month OS rate. No significant change was observed in COVID-19 mortality among hospitalized patients across the four pandemic phases (30%-33%). Hospitalizations and ICU admission decreased significantly (from 78% to 34% and 16% to 10%, respectively). Among 1522 patients with known vaccination status at COVID-19 diagnosis, 70% were non-vaccinated, 24% had incomplete vaccination, and 7% complete vaccination. Complete vaccination had a protective effect on hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.24; 95% confidence interval [0.14-0.38]), ICU admission (odds ratio = 0.29 [0.09-0.94]), and OS (hazard ratio = 0.39 [0.20-0.76]). In multivariable analyses, COVID-19 hospitalization was associated with patient/cancer characteristics, the first pandemic phase, the presence of COVID-19-related symptoms or inflammatory biomarkers, whereas COVID-19 mortality was significantly higher in symptomatic patients, males, older age, ethnicity other than Asian/Caucasian, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, body mass index <25, hematological malignancy, progressive disease versus no evident disease, and advanced cancer stage. CONCLUSIONS The updated CoCARE analysis, jointly with BSMO and PSMO, highlights factors that significantly affect COVID-19 outcomes, providing actionable clues for further reducing mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Martin
- Department of Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Z Tsourti
- Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - J Ribeiro
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Cancer Medicine, Villejuif, France
| | - L Castelo-Branco
- NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal; Scientific and Medical Division, ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - E de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Gennatas
- Medical Oncology Department, The Royal Marsden Hospital - NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Rogado
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Sekacheva
- World-Class Research Center 'Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare', Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - S Šušnjar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - D Viñal
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Lee
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester; Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Khallaf
- Medical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute (SECI), Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - G Dimopoulou
- Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - S Pradervand
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - J Whisenant
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville
| | - T K Choueiri
- The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Department of Oncology, Haematology and Palliative Care, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Harrington
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Royal Marsden/The Institute of Cancer Research NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - K Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Oliveira
- Department of Medicine, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal
| | - O Michielin
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - U Dafni
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Scientific and Medical Division, ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - E Romano
- Department of Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Felip E, Pradenas E, Romeo M, Marfil S, Trinité B, Urrea V, Hernández A, Ballana E, Cucurull M, Mateu L, Massanella M, Clotet B, Morán T, Blanco J. Impact of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy on neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine in patients with solid tumors. Mol Oncol 2023; 17:686-694. [PMID: 36495129 PMCID: PMC9877816 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with solid tumors have been a risk group since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to more significant complications, hospitalizations or deaths. The immunosuppressive state of cancer treatments or the tumor itself could influence the development of post-vaccination antibodies. This study prospectively analyzed 89 patients under chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, who received two doses of the mRNA-1237 vaccine, and were compared with a group of 26 non-cancer individuals. Information on adverse events and neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 (WH1) have been analyzed. Local reactions accounted for 65%, while systemic reactions accounted for 46% of oncologic individuals/cancer patients. Regarding the response to vaccination, 6.7% of cancer patients developed low neutralizing antibody levels. Lower levels of neutralizing antibodies between cancer and non-cancer groups were significant in individuals without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, but not in previously infected individuals. We also observed that patients receiving chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy have significantly lower levels of neutralizing antibodies than non-cancer individuals. In conclusion, our study confirms the importance of prioritizing cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eudald Felip
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research InstituteBadalonaSpain
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology – BadalonaBadalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO)Spain
| | | | - Margarita Romeo
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology – BadalonaBadalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO)Spain
| | | | | | | | - Ainhoa Hernández
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology – BadalonaBadalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO)Spain
| | - Ester Ballana
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research InstituteBadalonaSpain
- Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP)BadalonaSpain
- CIBER Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Institute of Health (ISCIII)MadridSpain
| | - Marc Cucurull
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology – BadalonaBadalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO)Spain
| | - Lourdes Mateu
- Infectious Diseases DepartmentHospital Universitari Germans Trias i PujolBadalonaSpain
- Fundació Lluita contra les InfeccionsHospital Universitari Germans Trias i PujolBadalonaSpain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Carlos III Institute of Health (ISCIII)MadridSpain
- University of Vic–Central University of Catalonia (UVic‐UCC)Spain
| | - Marta Massanella
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research InstituteBadalonaSpain
- CIBER Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Institute of Health (ISCIII)MadridSpain
- University of Vic–Central University of Catalonia (UVic‐UCC)Spain
| | - Bonaventura Clotet
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research InstituteBadalonaSpain
- CIBER Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Institute of Health (ISCIII)MadridSpain
- University of Vic–Central University of Catalonia (UVic‐UCC)Spain
| | - Teresa Morán
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology – BadalonaBadalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B‐ARGO)Spain
| | - Julià Blanco
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research InstituteBadalonaSpain
- Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP)BadalonaSpain
- CIBER Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Carlos III Institute of Health (ISCIII)MadridSpain
- University of Vic–Central University of Catalonia (UVic‐UCC)Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Adverse Hematological Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination and Pathomechanisms of Low Acquired Immunity in Patients with Hematological Malignancies. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030662. [PMID: 36992246 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 pandemic have spread across the world and severely impacted patients living with hematological conditions. Immunocompromised patients experience rapidly progressing symptoms following COVID-19 infection and are at high risk of death. In efforts to protect the vulnerable population, vaccination efforts have increased exponentially in the past 2 years. Although COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective, mild to moderate side effects such as headache, fatigue, and soreness at the injection site have been reported. In addition, there are reports of rare side effects, including anaphylaxis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, myocarditis, and pericarditis after vaccination. Further, hematological abnormalities and a very low and transient response in patients with hematological conditions after vaccination raise concerns. The objective of this review is to first briefly discuss the hematological adverse effects associated with COVID-19 infection in general populations followed by critically analyzing the side effects and pathomechanisms of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients with hematological and solid malignancies. We reviewed the published literature, with a focus on hematological abnormalities associated with COVID-19 infection followed by the hematological side effects of COVID-19 vaccination, and the mechanisms by which complications can occur. We extend this discussion to include the viability of vaccination efforts within immune-compromised patients. The primary aim is to provide clinicians with critical hematologic information on COVID-19 vaccination so that they can make informed decisions on how to protect their at-risk patients. The secondary goal is to clarify the adverse hematological effects associated with infection and vaccination within the general population to support continued vaccination within this group. There is a clear need to protect patients with hematological conditions from infection and modulate vaccine programs and procedures for these patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wankhede D, Grover S, Hofman P. Determinants of humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2023; 41:1791-1798. [PMID: 36792435 PMCID: PMC9922575 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Solid cancer patients following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are likely to have a lower seroconversion rate than healthy adults. Seroconversion between those with and without cancer is likely to vary moderately or to be restricted to specific subgroups. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors for diminished humoral immune responses in solid cancer patients. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to search literature through May 1, 2022. Prospective or retrospective studies comparing responders with non-responders against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) following COVID-19 vaccination were included. Pooled Odds Ratios (pORs) with 95% CIs for binary variables and differences in means (with SDs) for continuous variables were calculated to determine the pooled effect estimates of risk factors for poor antibody response. RESULTS Fifteen studies enrolling 3593 patients were included in the analysis. Seroconversion was seen in 84% of the pooled study population. Male gender, age >65 years, and recent chemotherapy were all factors in a poor immune response. Patients under follow-up, those who received immunotherapy or targeted therapy, were more likely to be seropositive. Cancer subtypes, vaccine types, and timing of antibody testing from the 2nd dose of vaccine did not correlate with seroconversion. CONCLUSION Cytotoxic therapy for solid cancer may portend poor immune response following 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines suggesting a need for booster doses in these patients. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are likely to be associated with seropositive status, and thus can be considered as an alternative to cytotoxic agents in cases where both therapies are equally efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Wankhede
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Sandeep Grover
- Center for Human Genetics, Universitatsklinikum Giessen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, 35055 Marburg, Germany
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Pasteur Hospital, University Côte d’Azur, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, 06002 Nice, France,Institute for Research on Cancer and Ageing, Nice (IRCAN), INSERM U1081 and UMR CNRS 7284, Team 4, Nice, France,Hospital-Integrated Biobank BB-0033-00025, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France,University Hospital Federation OncoAge, CHU de Nice, University Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Caruso T, Salani F, Catanese S, Pratesi F, Mercinelli C, Motta G, Genovesi V, Bonato A, Sara G, Masi G, Migliorini P. Repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: induction of high-avidity anti-RBD neutralizing antibodies. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:363-369. [PMID: 36689013 PMCID: PMC9869844 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02295-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients are more vulnerable to COVID-19 and are thus given high priority in vaccination campaigns. In solid cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, we evaluated the amount of anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies and antibody avidity after two or three doses of the vaccine. METHODS Thirty-eight solid cancer patients, 15 untreated hematological patients and 21 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Blood was collected before the first dose (T0), 21 days after the second (T2) and in 18 solid cancer patients also 15 days after the third dose of vaccine (T3). IgG, IgM and IgA anti-RBD antibodies were detected by ELISA. Neutralizing antibodies were measured testing the inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2. Antibody avidity was evaluated in 18 patients by a urea avidity ELISA. RESULTS IgG anti-RBD antibodies were produced in 65.8% of the cancer patients at T2, and in 60% of hematological patients at levels lower than healthy controls. IgM and IgA anti-RBD antibodies were also produced in 5.3% and 21% cancer patients, respectively. At T3, a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG levels was observed. Neutralizing antibodies were produced in 68.4% of cancer patients as compared with 93% of untreated hematological patients and 100% of controls, at titers lower than in healthy subjects. At T3, neutralizing antibodies and avidity of IgG anti-RBD increased; 6/18 patients negative at T2 developed neutralizing antibodies at T3. CONCLUSION The data indicate that in cancer patients mRNA vaccine induces high avidity anti-RBD antibodies and neutralizing antibodies that increase after the third dose. The process of induction and selection of high-affinity antibodies is apparently unaffected by the treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresita Caruso
- Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Salani
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Catanese
- Department of Translational Medicine and New Technologies for Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Pratesi
- Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Mercinelli
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Motta
- Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Virginia Genovesi
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Adele Bonato
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Galimberti Sara
- Hematology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianluca Masi
- Department of Translational Medicine and New Technologies for Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Migliorini
- Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Malignant Disease. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020486. [PMID: 36851363 PMCID: PMC9962104 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
A novel virus named SARS-CoV-2 has caused a worldwide pandemic, resulting in a disastrous impact to the public health since 2019. The disease is much more lethal among patients with malignant disease. Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of infection and subsequent severe COVID-19. However, the efficacy and safety of vaccines for cancer patients needs further investigation. Encouragingly, there have been important findings deduced from research so far. In this review, an overview of the immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safeness of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer to date is to be shown. We also highlight important questions to consider and directions that could be followed in future research.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruiz JI, Lopez-Olivo MA, Geng Y, Suarez-Almazor ME. COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006246. [PMID: 36746512 PMCID: PMC9905786 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-006246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can cause off-target inflammatory and immune-related adverse events (irAE). Conceivably, COVID-19 vaccination could trigger an inflammatory and immune response that could induce or aggravate irAE. METHODS The objective of this systematic review is to appraise the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer treated with ICI. The literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase in English from December 2019 to February 2022. The review included clinical trials, observational cohort studies, case series, and case reports reporting on the clinical efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines on patients with cancer treated with ICI. Outcomes of interest included seroconversion, SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, severe COVID-19, COVID-19 mortality rate. Incidence of ICI irAEs was also ascertained as well as vaccine adverse events. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled effect sizes of the outcomes when possible, using random effects models. RESULTS Overall, 19 studies were included for the analysis (n=10 865 with 2477 receiving ICI). We analyzed 15 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, and 3 case reports. There were no statistically significant differences in seroconversion rates after the second dose of the vaccine when comparing patients with cancer receiving ICI with patients without cancer (risk ratio, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.03) or with patients with cancer without active treatment (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.04). There was a higher probability of seroconversion in patients with cancer treated with ICI compared with patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18). In a single study in patients receiving ICI, no differences were observed in risk of irAE between those receiving inactivated vaccine and those unvaccinated (pneumonitis RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.3; rash RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.62; arthralgia RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.75). There were no studies for other types of vaccines comparing vaccinated vs not vaccinated in patients treated with ICI. The most common vaccine-related adverse events were local pain or fatigue. Overall, the quality of evidence was rated as very low. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccination appears to be effective and safe in patients with cancer receiving ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ignacio Ruiz
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yimin Geng
- Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Linjawi M, Shakoor H, Hilary S, Ali HI, Al-Dhaheri AS, Ismail LC, Apostolopoulos V, Stojanovska L. Cancer Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mini-Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11020248. [PMID: 36673615 PMCID: PMC9859465 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Since its emergence, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the entire world and all commerce and industries, including healthcare systems. COVID-19 adversely affects cancer patients because they are immunocompromised. Increased COVID-19 infection and shortage of medical supplies, beds and healthcare workers in hospitals affect cancer care. This paper includes a description of the existing research that shows the impact of COVID-19 on the management of cancer patients. Aged people with various chronic conditions such as cancer and comorbidities face more challenges as they have a greater risk of disease severity. COVID-19 has affected care delivery, including patient management, and has been responsible for increased mortality among cancer patients. Cancer patients with severe symptoms require regular therapies and treatment; therefore, they have a higher risk of exposure. Due to the risk of transmission, various steps were taken to combat this disease; however, they have affected the existing operational efficiency. Herein, we present the changing priorities during COVID-19, which also affected cancer care, including delayed diagnosis, treatment, and surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Linjawi
- Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
| | - Hira Shakoor
- Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
| | - Serene Hilary
- Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
- Correspondence: (S.H.); (L.S.)
| | - Habiba I. Ali
- Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ayesha S. Al-Dhaheri
- Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
| | - Leila Cheikh Ismail
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences (RIMHS), University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Vasso Apostolopoulos
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia
| | - Lily Stojanovska
- Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3030, Australia
- Correspondence: (S.H.); (L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Safarnezhad Tameshkel F, Abedin Dargoush S, Amirkalali B, Javadi S, Ghiaseddin A, Alimohamadi Y, Basi A, Jamshidi Makiani M, Zamani F, Karbalaie Niya MH. SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccination in cancer patients: A case-control study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 9:1095194. [PMID: 36743671 PMCID: PMC9893850 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1095194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Long-term safety and efficacy of BBIBP-CorV vaccine especially in individuals with chronic diseases, like cancer, is under investigation. In the present prospective study, we aimed to evaluate severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody response with BBIBP-CorV vaccine in Iranian cancer patients. Methods All the patients registered to receive BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine were divided into two groups of with (cases = 107) and without (controls = 45) history of cancer. Serum levels of SARS-CoV anti-spike recombinant receptor binding domain (anti-sRBD) and anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) IgG serum levels were measured on days 0 (phase 0), 28-32 (phase I), and 56-64 (phase II) of vaccination. The data were analyzed using SPSS, version 22. Results Totally, 152 individuals (67.1% females) with the mean age of 46.71 ± 15.36 years were included. Solid cancers included 87.8% of the cancer cases (46.7% gynecological and 31.8% gastrointestinal cancer). At Phases I and II, positive anti-sRBD IgG and anti-N IgG were significantly lower among the cases in total analysis. Side effects were not significantly different between the cases and controls. The lowest positive anti-sRBD IgG test was observed among the cancer patients who were simultaneously receiving chemotherapy (35.3%). Anti-sRBD IgG and anti-N IgG serum levels significantly increased at phases I and II in total analysis and in each group. In addition, serum anti-sRBD IgG increased during the three phases and it was significantly higher in the control group. Conclusion Full vaccination of COVID-19 by BBIBP-CorV in immunocompromised patients such as cancer patients is safe and effective and could induce antibody response but in lower levels compared to healthy people. Probable causes to have minor antibody response found in males, older ages, individuals with BMI ≥ 25, those without past history of COVID-19 and with hematologic cancers. No significant side effects after vaccination were seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shabnam Abedin Dargoush
- Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bahareh Amirkalali
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeedeh Javadi
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Ghiaseddin
- Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | - Yousef Alimohamadi
- Health Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Basi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahin Jamshidi Makiani
- Antimicrobial Resistant Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Firoozgar General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farhad Zamani
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hadi Karbalaie Niya
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Virology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Castro DV, Zengin ZB, Malhotra J, Bergerot CD, Meza L, Dizman N, Govindarajan A, Hsu J, Chehrazi-Raffle A, Chawla N, Mercier BD, Chen SW, Feng M, Prajapati S, Lee KO, Philip EJ, Dorff TB, Lyou Y, Pal SK. Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Genitourinary Cancers: A Survey Study. Cancer Invest 2023; 41:70-76. [PMID: 36239609 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2136683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Since the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, their safety and efficacy has been widely demonstrated in patients with cancer. However, there remain patients with reservations regarding vaccination. We aimed to assess genitourinary cancer patients' perceptions of the vaccines as well as barriers and influencers of decision-making through the completion of a questionnaire. While vaccine-associated concerns were observed, most patients with genitourinary cancers were willing to receive the vaccine. Moving forward, differing strategies could be considered to enhance patient education on the utility of vaccination in the setting of cancer and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela V Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Zeynep B Zengin
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jasnoor Malhotra
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Cristiane D Bergerot
- Centro de Câncer de Brasília (CETTRO), Instituto Unity de Ensino e Pesquisa, Brasília, Brazil
| | - Luis Meza
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Nazli Dizman
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ameish Govindarajan
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - JoAnn Hsu
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Alex Chehrazi-Raffle
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Neal Chawla
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Benjamin D Mercier
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Sean W Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Matthew Feng
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Sweta Prajapati
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Kyle O Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Errol J Philip
- University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Tanya B Dorff
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Yung Lyou
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology & Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yin J, Chen Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Wang C. Seroconversion rate after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2119763. [PMID: 36161976 PMCID: PMC9746490 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2119763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with solid cancer have an increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the currently available evidence about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with solid cancer. We included prospective studies comparing the immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines between patients with solid cancer and healthy individuals. Relative risks of seroconversion after the first and second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine were separately pooled with the use of random effects meta-analysis. Thirty studies with 11,245 subjects met the inclusion criteria. After first vaccine dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer vs healthy individuals was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38-0.78, I2 = 94%). After a second dose, the pooled RR of seroconversion in patients with solid cancer vs healthy controls was 0.87 (0.86-0.88, I2 = 87%). Our review suggests that, compared with healthy individuals, COVID-19 vaccines show favorable immunogenicity and efficacy in patients with solid cancer. A second dose is associated with significantly improved seroconversion, although it is slightly lower in patients with solid cancer compared with healthy individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juntao Yin
- Department of Pharmacy, Huaihe Hospital, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Yangyang Chen
- Cardiology, Huaihe Hospital, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Huaihe Hospital, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China
| | - Xingwang Zhang
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chaoyang Wang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cancer Patients and the COVID-19 Vaccines: Considerations and Challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225630. [PMID: 36428722 PMCID: PMC9688380 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Few guidelines exist for COVID-19 vaccination amongst cancer patients, fostering uncertainty regarding the immunogenicity, safety, and effects of cancer therapies on vaccination, which this review aims to address. A literature review was conducted to include the latest articles covering the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid and hematologic cancers receiving various treatments. Lower seropositivity following vaccination was associated with malignancy (compared to the general population), and hematologic malignancy (compared to solid cancers). Patients receiving active cancer therapy (unspecified), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunosuppressants generally demonstrated lower seropositivity compared to healthy controls; though checkpoint inhibition, endocrine therapy, and cyclin dependent kinase inhibition did not appear to affect seropositivity. Vaccination appeared safe and well-tolerated in patients with current or past cancer and those undergoing treatment. Adverse events were comparable to the general population, but inflammatory lymphadenopathy following vaccination was commonly reported and may be mistaken for malignant etiology. Additionally, radiation recall phenomenon was sporadically reported in patients who had received radiotherapy. Overall, while seropositivity rates were decreased, cancer patients showed capacity to generate safe and effective immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination, thus vaccination should be encouraged and hesitancy should be addressed in this population.
Collapse
|
20
|
DeWolf S, Laracy JC, Perales MA, Kamboj M, van den Brink MRM, Vardhana S. SARS-CoV-2 in immunocompromised individuals. Immunity 2022; 55:1779-1798. [PMID: 36182669 PMCID: PMC9468314 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Immunocompromised individuals and particularly those with hematologic malignancies are at increased risk for SARS-CoV-2-associated morbidity and mortality due to immunologic deficits that limit prevention, treatment, and clearance of the virus. Understanding the natural history of viral infections in people with impaired immunity due to underlying conditions, immunosuppressive therapy, or a combination thereof has emerged as a critical area of investigation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies focused on these individuals have provided key insights into aspects of innate and adaptive immunity underlying both the antiviral immune response and excess inflammation in the setting of COVID-19. This review presents what is known about distinct states of immunologic vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2 and how this information can be harnessed to improve prevention and treatment strategies for immunologically high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan DeWolf
- Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin C Laracy
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miguel-Angel Perales
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mini Kamboj
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcel R M van den Brink
- Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Immunology, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Santosha Vardhana
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Luangdilok S, Wanchaijiraboon P, Pakvisal N, Susiriwatananont T, Zungsontiporn N, Sriuranpong V, Sainamthip P, Suntronwong N, Vichaiwattana P, Wanlapakorn N, Poovorawan Y, Teeyapun N, Tanasanvimon S. Immunogenicity after a Third COVID-19 mRNA Booster in Solid Cancer Patients Who Previously Received the Primary Heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 Vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1613. [PMID: 36298478 PMCID: PMC9608216 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
No data regarding the efficacy of a third mRNA vaccine for solid cancer patients previously primed with the heterologous CoronoVac/ChAdOx1 vaccination implemented in Thailand during the shortage of vaccine supply are available. Forty-four cancer patients who previously received the heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 regimen were boosted with a third mRNA COVID vaccine, either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Anti-RBD IgG was measured immediately before, two weeks after, and four weeks after the third dose. The antibody response was compared to 87 age- and gender-matched cancer patients who were primed with the homologous ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 regimens. Post-third dose anti-RBD IgG levels significantly increased compared to pre-third dose levels. There was no statistical difference in post-third dose antibody titers or neutralization levels between these two primary series regimens. Treatment with chemotherapy was associated with a lower antibody response compared to endocrine therapy/biologics. Similar antibody levels were observed after a third booster with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 following heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 vaccination. There was no statistical difference in the immune response following the third-dose vaccination between cancer patients and healthy individuals who received the same heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 vaccination. In conclusion, a similar degree of enhanced immunogenicity was observed after a third mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in solid cancer patients who previously received the heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sutima Luangdilok
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Passakorn Wanchaijiraboon
- Phrapokklao Cancer Center of Excellence, Phrapokklao Clinical Research Center, Phrapokklao Genomic Laboratories, Phrapokklao Hospital, Mueang District, Chanthaburi 22000, Thailand
| | - Nussara Pakvisal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Thiti Susiriwatananont
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Nicha Zungsontiporn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Virote Sriuranpong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Panot Sainamthip
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Nungruthai Suntronwong
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Preeyaporn Vichaiwattana
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Yong Poovorawan
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Nattaya Teeyapun
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Suebpong Tanasanvimon
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mehrabi Nejad MM, Shobeiri P, Dehghanbanadaki H, Tabary M, Aryannejad A, Haji Ghadery A, Shabani M, Moosaie F, SeyedAlinaghi S, Rezaei N. Seroconversion following the first, second, and third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in immunocompromised population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Virol J 2022; 19:132. [PMID: 35941646 PMCID: PMC9358061 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-022-01858-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunocompromised (IC) patients are at higher risk of more severe COVID-19 infections than the general population. Special considerations should be dedicated to such patients. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines based on the vaccine type and etiology as well as the necessity of booster dose in this high-risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for observational studies published between June 1st, 2020, and September 1st, 2021, which investigated the seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccine administration in adult patients with IC conditions. For investigation of sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. RESULTS According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we included 81 articles in the meta-analysis. The overall crude prevalence of seroconversion after the first (n: 7460), second (n: 13,181), and third (n: 909, all population were transplant patients with mRNA vaccine administration) dose administration was 26.17% (95% CI 19.01%, 33.99%, I2 = 97.1%), 57.11% (95% CI: 49.22%, 64.83%, I2 = 98.4%), and 48.65% (95% CI: 34.63%, 62.79%, I2 = 94.4%). Despite the relatively same immunogenicity of mRNA and vector-based vaccines after the first dose, the mRNA vaccines induced higher immunity after the second dose. Regarding the etiologic factor, transplant patients were less likely to develop immunity after both first and second dose rather than patients with malignancy (17.0% vs 37.0% after first dose, P = 0.02; 38.3% vs 72.1% after second dose, P < 0.001) or autoimmune disease (17.0% vs 36.4%, P = 0.04; 38.3% vs 80.2%, P < 0.001). To evaluate the efficacy of the third dose, we observed an increasing trend in transplant patients after the first (17.0%), second (38.3%), and third (48.6%) dose. CONCLUSION The rising pattern of seroconversion after boosting tends to be promising. In this case, more attention should be devoted to transplant patients who possess the lowest response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabi Nejad
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.,School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parnian Shobeiri
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Hojat Dehghanbanadaki
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Tabary
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Armin Aryannejad
- Experimental Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdolkarim Haji Ghadery
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahya Shabani
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Moosaie
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran. .,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goldman JD, Gonzalez MA, Rüthrich MM, Sharon E, von Lilienfeld-Toal M. COVID-19 and Cancer: Special Considerations for Patients Receiving Immunotherapy and Immunosuppressive Cancer Therapies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-13. [PMID: 35658503 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_359656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cancer generally have a higher risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19, with higher age, male sex, poor performance status, cancer type, and uncontrolled malignant disease as the main risk factors. However, the influence of specific cancer therapies varies and raises concerns during the pandemic. In patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy or other immunosuppressive cancer treatments, we summarize the evidence on outcomes from COVID-19; address the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination; and review COVID-19 antiviral therapeutics for the patient with cancer. Despite higher mortality for patients with cancer, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors does not seem to increase mortality risk based on observational evidence. Inhibitory therapies directed toward B-cell lineages, including monoclonal antibodies against CD20 and CAR T-cell therapies, are associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19; however, the data are sparse. Regarding vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, clinical efficacy comparable to that in the general population can be expected. In patients undergoing B-cell-depleting therapy, immunogenicity and clinical efficacy are curtailed, but vaccination is not futile, which is thought to be due to the cellular response. Vaccine reactogenicity and toxicity in all groups of patients with cancer are comparable to that of the general population. Preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral spike may provide passive immunity for those not likely to mount an adequate vaccine response. If infected, prompt treatment with monoclonal antibodies or oral small molecule antivirals is beneficial, though with oral antiviral therapies, care must be taken to avoid drug interactions in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Goldman
- Swedish Center for Research and Innovation, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA.,Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.,Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael A Gonzalez
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.,Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria Madeleine Rüthrich
- Klinik für Notfallmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.,Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans-Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany
| | - Elad Sharon
- Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans-Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany.,Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fendler A, de Vries EGE, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Haanen JB, Wörmann B, Turajlic S, von Lilienfeld-Toal M. COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer: immunogenicity, efficacy and safety. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:385-401. [PMID: 35277694 PMCID: PMC8916486 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00610-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cancer have a higher risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. Owing to this increased risk, patients with cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination globally, for both primary and booster vaccinations. However, given that these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, and the extent of humoral and cellular immune responses in these patients, as well as the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge generated in studies conducted since COVID-19 vaccines first became available. We also highlight critical points that might affect vaccine efficacy in patients with cancer in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Fendler
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - John B Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bernhard Wörmann
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
- Research Group Infections in Haematology/Oncology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Carta MG, Orrù G, Cossu G, Velluzzi F, Atzori L, Aviles Gonzalez CI, Romano F, Littera R, Chessa L, Firinu D, Del Giacco S, Restivo A, Deidda S, Scano A, Onali S, Kalcev G, Coghe F, Minerba L. Covid-19 vaccines work but other factors play a relevant role: a data analysis on spread and mortality in 24 countries. J Public Health Res 2022; 11. [PMID: 35322646 PMCID: PMC8996068 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2022.2665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to outline a methodology to monitor the impact of vaccinations in different countries comparing at two different times within countries and between countries the frequency of new cases and Covid-19 related deaths and the percentage of vaccinations conducted. DESIGN AND METHODS The 25 countries with the largest increase in SARS-CoV-2 cases on 8 August 2021 were evaluated. In each nation was calculated the proportion of Covid-19 deaths divided per new cases x 100 and the proportion of new cases per 1.000 inhabitants on 10 January 2021 (before vaccinations' distribution) and 8 August 2021 (when large percentage of the population had been vaccinated in many countries). RESULTS The study shows that in the countries with the highest number of cases as of 8 August 2021, the proportion of vaccinations carried out in the population correlates negatively with both the proportion between Covid-19 dead people x100 infected people and with the rate of new cases. However, the proportion of vaccinations does not correlate with the differences in the two same indicators considered in the weeks observed, thus additional factors seem to play an important role. CONCLUSIONS This work indicates that mass vaccination is associated with a lower spread of the pandemic and, to greater extent, with a lowering of mortality in infected people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Germano Orrù
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Giulia Cossu
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Fernanda Velluzzi
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Laura Atzori
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | | | | | - Roberto Littera
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Luchino Chessa
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Davide Firinu
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Stefano Del Giacco
- Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Cagliari.
| | - Angelo Restivo
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari.
| | - Simona Deidda
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari.
| | | | - Simona Onali
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari.
| | - Goce Kalcev
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Ferinando Coghe
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| | - Luigi Minerba
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Seneviratne SL, Yasawardene P, Wijerathne W, Somawardana B. COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients: a narrative review. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221086155. [PMID: 35313761 PMCID: PMC8943636 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221086155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected over 220 million individuals worldwide,
and has been shown to cause increased disease severity and mortality in patients
with active cancer versus healthy individuals. Vaccination is important in
reducing COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. Thus, the aim of this
article was to review the existing knowledge on effectiveness, immunogenicity
and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer. Fifty-four articles
were included following a search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases for
studies published between January 2020 and September 2021 that investigated
humoral and cell-mediated immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in
patients with cancer. Immunogenicity of vaccines was found to be lower in
patients with cancer versus healthy individuals, and humoral immune responses
were inferior in those with haematological versus solid cancers. Patient-,
disease-, and treatment-related factors associated with poorer vaccine responses
should be identified and corrected or mitigated when possible. Consideration
should be given to offering patients with cancer second doses of COVID vaccine
at shorter intervals than in healthy individuals. Patients with cancer warrant a
third vaccine dose and must be prioritized in vaccination schedules. Vaccine
adverse effect profiles are comparable between patients with cancer and healthy
individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suranjith L Seneviratne
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Nawaloka Hospital Research and Education Foundation, Nawaloka Hospitals, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Pamodh Yasawardene
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Buddhika Somawardana
- Department of Haemato-Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee ARYB, Wong SY, Chai LYA, Lee SC, Lee MX, Muthiah MD, Tay SH, Teo CB, Tan BKJ, Chan YH, Sundar R, Soon YY. Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2022; 376:e068632. [PMID: 35236664 PMCID: PMC8889026 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 111.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of covid-19 vaccines between immunocompromised and immunocompetent people. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, Central Register of Controlled Trials, COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Challenge (CORD-19), and WHO covid-19 databases for studies published between 1 December 2020 and 5 November 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched in November 2021 to identify registered but as yet unpublished or ongoing studies. STUDY SELECTION Prospective observational studies comparing the efficacy of covid-19 vaccination in immunocompromised and immunocompetent participants. METHODS A frequentist random effects meta-analysis was used to separately pool relative and absolute risks of seroconversion after the first and second doses of a covid-19 vaccine. Systematic review without meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody titre levels was performed after first, second, and third vaccine doses and the seroconversion rate after a third dose. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. RESULTS 82 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of these studies, 77 (94%) used mRNA vaccines, 16 (20%) viral vector vaccines, and 4 (5%) inactivated whole virus vaccines. 63 studies were assessed to be at low risk of bias and 19 at moderate risk of bias. After one vaccine dose, seroconversion was about half as likely in patients with haematological cancers (risk ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.50, I2=80%; absolute risk 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.40, I2=89%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.53, 0.39 to 0.71, I2=89%; 0.29, 0.11 to 0.58, I2=97%), and solid cancers (0.55, 0.46 to 0.65, I2=78%; 0.44, 0.36 to 0.53, I2=84%) compared with immunocompetent controls, whereas organ transplant recipients were 16 times less likely to seroconvert (0.06, 0.04 to 0.09, I2=0%; 0.06, 0.04 to 0.08, I2=0%). After a second dose, seroconversion remained least likely in transplant recipients (0.39, 0.32 to 0.46, I2=92%; 0.35, 0.26 to 0.46), with only a third achieving seroconversion. Seroconversion was increasingly likely in patients with haematological cancers (0.63, 0.57 to 0.69, I2=88%; 0.62, 0.54 to 0.70, I2=90%), immune mediated inflammatory disorders (0.75, 0.69 to 0.82, I2=92%; 0.77, 0.66 to 0.85, I2=93%), and solid cancers (0.90, 0.88 to 0.93, I2=51%; 0.89, 0.86 to 0.91, I2=49%). Seroconversion was similar between people with HIV and immunocompetent controls (1.00, 0.98 to 1.01, I2=0%; 0.97, 0.83 to 1.00, I2=89%). Systematic review of 11 studies showed that a third dose of a covid-19 mRNA vaccine was associated with seroconversion among vaccine non-responders with solid cancers, haematological cancers, and immune mediated inflammatory disorders, although response was variable in transplant recipients and inadequately studied in people with HIV and those receiving non-mRNA vaccines. CONCLUSION Seroconversion rates after covid-19 vaccination were significantly lower in immunocompromised patients, especially organ transplant recipients. A second dose was associated with consistently improved seroconversion across all patient groups, albeit at a lower magnitude for organ transplant recipients. Targeted interventions for immunocompromised patients, including a third (booster) dose, should be performed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021272088.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shi Yin Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Louis Yi Ann Chai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Synthetic Biology for Clinical and Technological Innovation, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Soo Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, 119228, Singapore
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Matilda Xinwei Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, 119228, Singapore
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, Singapore
| | - Sen Hee Tay
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chong Boon Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Yiong Huak Chan
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raghav Sundar
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, 119228, Singapore
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Gastric Cancer Consortium, Singapore
| | - Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tomalka JA, Suthar MS, Deeks SG, Sekaly RP. Fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic requires a global approach to understanding the heterogeneity of vaccine responses. Nat Immunol 2022; 23:360-370. [PMID: 35210622 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-022-01130-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Host genetic and environmental factors including age, biological sex, diet, geographical location, microbiome composition and metabolites converge to influence innate and adaptive immune responses to vaccines. Failure to understand and account for these factors when investigating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine efficacy may impair the development of the next generation of vaccines. Most studies aimed at identifying mechanisms of vaccine-mediated immune protection have focused on adaptive immune responses. It is well established, however, that mobilization of the innate immune response is essential to the development of effective cellular and humoral immunity. A comprehensive understanding of the innate immune response and environmental factors that contribute to the development of broad and durable cellular and humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and other vaccines requires a holistic and unbiased approach. Along with optimization of the immunogen and vectors, the development of adjuvants based on our evolving understanding of how the innate immune system shapes vaccine responses will be essential. Defining the innate immune mechanisms underlying the establishment of long-lived plasma cells and memory T cells could lead to a universal vaccine for coronaviruses, a key biomedical priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Tomalka
- Pathology Advanced Translational Research Unit, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mehul S Suthar
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Steven G Deeks
- Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rafick Pierre Sekaly
- Pathology Advanced Translational Research Unit, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. .,Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mehrabi Nejad MM, Moosaie F, Dehghanbanadaki H, Haji Ghadery A, Shabani M, Tabary M, Aryannejad A, SeyedAlinaghi S, Rezaei N. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:23. [PMID: 35151362 PMCID: PMC8840778 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00648-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunocompromised (IC) patients are at higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, morbidity, and mortality compared to the general population. They should be prioritized for primary prevention through vaccination. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in IC patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis approach. METHOD PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for original articles reporting the immunogenicity of two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adult patients with IC condition between June 1, 2020 and September 1, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using either random or fixed effect according to the heterogeneity of the studies. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS A total of 26 studies on 3207 IC patients and 1726 healthy individuals were included. The risk of seroconversion in IC patients was 48% lower than those in controls (RR = 0.52 [0.42, 0.65]). IC patients with autoimmune conditions were 54%, and patients with malignancy were 42% more likely to have positive seroconversion than transplant recipients (P < 0.01). Subgroup meta-analysis based on the type of malignancy, revealed significantly higher proportion of positive seroconversion in solid organ compared to hematologic malignancies (RR = 0.88 [0.85, 0.92] vs. 0.61 [0.44, 0.86], P = 0.03). Subgroup meta-analysis based on type of transplantation (kidney vs. others) showed no statistically significant between-group difference of seroconversion (P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS IC patients, especially transplant recipients, developed lower immunogenicity with two-dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Among patients with IC, those with autoimmune conditions and solid organ malignancies are mostly benefited from COVID-19 vaccination. Findings from this meta-analysis could aid healthcare policymakers in making decisions regarding the importance of the booster dose or more strict personal protections in the IC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabi Nejad
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Moosaie
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hojat Dehghanbanadaki
- Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdolkarim Haji Ghadery
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahya Shabani
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Tabary
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Armin Aryannejad
- Experimental Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, 1419733141, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Galmiche S, Luong Nguyen LB, Tartour E, de Lamballerie X, Wittkop L, Loubet P, Launay O. Immunological and clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 28:163-177. [PMID: 35020589 PMCID: PMC8595936 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Available data show that COVID-19 vaccines may be less effective in immunocompromised populations, who are at increased risk of severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVES We conducted a systematic review of literature to assess immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations. DATA SOURCES We searched Medline and Embase databases. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS We included studies of COVID-19 vaccines after complete vaccination in immunocompromised patients until 31 August 2021. Studies with <10 patients, safety data only and case series of breakthrough infections were excluded. METHODS Risk of bias was assessed via the tool developed by the National Institutes of Health on interventional and observational studies. Immunogenicity was assessed through non-response rate defined as no anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies, efficacy and effectiveness by the relative reduction in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19. We collected factors associated with the risk of non-response. We presented collected data by immunosuppression type. RESULTS We screened 5917 results, included 162 studies. There were 157 on immunogenicity in 25 209 participants, including 7835 cancer or haematological malignancy patients (31.1%), 6302 patients on dialysis (25.0%), 5974 solid organ transplant recipients (23.7%) and 4680 immune-mediated disease patients (18.6%). Proportion of non-responders seemed higher among solid organ transplant recipients (range 18-100%) and patients with haematological malignancy (range 14-61%), and lower in patients with cancer (range 2-36%) and patients on dialysis (range 2-30%). Risk factors for non-response included older age, use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or anti-CD20 agent. Ten studies evaluated immunogenicity of an additional dose. Five studies evaluated vaccine efficacy or effectiveness: three on SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 71-81%), one on COVID-19-related hospitalization (62.9%), one had a too small sample size. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights the risk of low immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised populations, especially solid organ transplant recipients and patients with haematological malignancy. Despite lack of vaccine effectiveness data, enhanced vaccine regimens may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Galmiche
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Liem Binh Luong Nguyen
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), CIC Cochin Pasteur, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Eric Tartour
- AP-HP, Immunologie Biologique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Xavier de Lamballerie
- Aix Marseille Université, IRD 190, INSERM 1207, Unité des Virus Emergents, UVE, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
| | - Linda Wittkop
- Institut de Santé Publique d'Epidémiologie et de Développement, INSERM, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Epidémiologie Clinique 1401, University of Bordeaux, Service d'Information Médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Loubet
- INSERM U1047, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, CHU Nîmes, Université Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Odile Launay
- Université de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, AP-PH, Inserm, CIC Cochin Pasteur, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Amatu A, Pani A, Patelli G, Gagliardi OM, Loparco M, Piscazzi D, Cassingena A, Tosi F, Ghezzi S, Campisi D, Grifantini R, Abrignani S, Siena S, Scaglione F, Sartore-Bianchi A. Impaired seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with solid tumours receiving anticancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 2021; 163:16-25. [PMID: 35032813 PMCID: PMC8692068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with solid tumours have high COVID-19 mortality. Limited and heterogeneous data are available regarding the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in this population. Methods and findings This is a prospective, single-centre cohort study aiming at evaluating seroconversion in terms of anti-spike antibodies in a population of patients with solid tumours undergoing cancer therapy within 2 months before the second vaccine dose, as compared with a cohort of controls. Subjects who were not SARS-CoV-2 naïve were excluded, and 171 patients were included in the final study population (150 vaccinated with BNT162b2, 87.7%; 21 with mRNA-1273, 12.3%) and compared with 2406 controls. The median follow-up time from the second dose of vaccination was 30 days (12–42; IQR: 26–34). Most patients had metastatic disease (138, 80.7%). Seroconversion rate was significantly lower in cancer patients than in controls (94.2% versus 99.8%, p < 0.001). At univariate logistic regression analysis, Odds ratio (OR) for seroconversion was also reduced in older individuals (>70 years). A multivariate logistic model confirmed cancer as the only significant variable in impairing seroconversion (OR 0.03, p < 0.001). In the cancer population, a multivariate analysis among clinical variables, including the type of cancer treatment, showed ECOG PS > 2 as the only one of impact (OR 0.07, p = 0.012). Conclusions There is a fraction of 6% of patients with solid tumours undergoing cancer treatment, mainly with poorer performance status, who fail to obtain seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. These patients should be considered for enhanced vaccination strategies and carefully monitored for SARS-CoV-2 infection during cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Amatu
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Pani
- SC Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologia, Dipartimento Medicina di Laboratorio, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Patelli
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Oscar M Gagliardi
- SC Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologia, Dipartimento Medicina di Laboratorio, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Loparco
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Piscazzi
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Cassingena
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Tosi
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Ghezzi
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Campisi
- SC Analisi Chimico Cliniche e Microbiologia, Dipartimento Medicina di Laboratorio, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Renata Grifantini
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; INGM, Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare 'Romeo Ed Enrica Invernizzi', Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Abrignani
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; INGM, Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare 'Romeo Ed Enrica Invernizzi', Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siena
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Scaglione
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
- SC Oncologia Falck, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Oncologia e Medicina Molecolare, Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia Ed Emato-Oncologia, Università Degli Studi di Milano (La Statale), Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|