1
|
Kou K, Cameron J, Dasgupta P, Price A, Chen H, Lopez D, Mengersen K, Hayes S, Baade P. Beyond the urban-rural divide: Exploring spatial variations in breast cancer outcomes in Queensland, Australia. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 93:102681. [PMID: 39366328 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. While previous studies have reported urban and rural differences in breast cancer outcomes, the level of heterogeneity within these broad regions is currently unknown. METHODS Population-level data from Queensland Cancer Register including 58,679 women aged at least 20 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland, Australia, 2000-2019 were linked to BreastScreen Queensland and Queensland Hospital Admitted Patients Data Collection to estimate five breast cancer outcomes: incidence, proportion of localised disease and screen-detected cases (via public-funded program), surgical rates, and 5-year survival. Bayesian spatial models were used to smooth outcomes across 512-517 small areas in Queensland. RESULTS The incidence of breast cancer was not proportionally distributed, with urban regions having higher rates. Less than half (47 %) of women were diagnosed with localised disease, 91 % had surgery, with five-year relative survival of 92 %. There was no evidence of geographic variation in the proportion of localised disease, surgical rates, or survival over Queensland. Publicly-funded screening detected 38 % of cases, with lower proportion of screen-detected cases observed in Queensland's urbanised south-east corner. CONCLUSION Although the disparities in health outcomes faced by Australians living in rural areas have received increased attention, this study found limited evidence for spatial variation in breast cancer outcomes along the continuum of care across Queensland. These results suggest the detection and management practices for breast cancer may provide an achievable benchmark for other cancer types in reducing the geographical disparity in cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kou Kou
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jessica Cameron
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Aiden Price
- Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Hao Chen
- Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Derrick Lopez
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kerrie Mengersen
- Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sandi Hayes
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Peter Baade
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Conti B, Bochaton A, Charreire H, Kitzis-Bonsang H, Desprès C, Baffert S, Ngô C. Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271319. [PMID: 35853035 PMCID: PMC9295987 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Socio-economic and geographical inequalities in breast cancer mortality have been widely described in European countries and the United States. To investigate the combined effects of geographic access and socio-economic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes, a systematic review was conducted exploring the relationships between: (i) geographic access to healthcare facilities (oncology services, mammography screening), defined as travel time and/or travel distance; (ii) breast cancer-related outcomes (mammography screening, stage of cancer at diagnosis, type of treatment and rate of mortality); (iii) socioeconomic status (SES) at individuals and residential context levels. In total, n = 25 studies (29 relationships tested) were included in our systematic review. The four main results are: The statistical significance of the relationship between geographic access and breast cancer-related outcomes is heterogeneous: 15 were identified as significant and 14 as non-significant. Women with better geographic access to healthcare facilities had a statistically significant fewer mastectomy (n = 4/6) than women with poorer geographic access. The relationship with the stage of the cancer is more balanced (n = 8/17) and the relationship with cancer screening rate is not observed (n = 1/4). The type of measures of geographic access (distance, time or geographical capacity) does not seem to have any influence on the results. For example, studies which compared two different measures (travel distance and travel time) of geographic access obtained similar results. The relationship between SES characteristics and breast cancer-related outcomes is significant for several variables: at individual level, age and health insurance status; at contextual level, poverty rate and deprivation index. Of the 25 papers included in the review, the large majority (n = 24) tested the independent effect of geographic access. Only one study explored the combined effect of geographic access to breast cancer facilities and SES characteristics by developing stratified models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Conti
- LVMT, Université Gustave Eiffel, Ecole des Ponts, Champs-sur-Marne, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Audrey Bochaton
- Université Paris Nanterre, UMR 7533 LADYSS, Nanterre, France
| | - Hélène Charreire
- Université Paris-Est, Lab’Urba, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | | | - Caroline Desprès
- Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Equipe Etres, France
| | | | - Charlotte Ngô
- Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
- Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Equipe Etres, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trends in surgery and adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study in Queensland, Australia. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:175-185. [PMID: 35254604 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06551-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to describe variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer and to examine factors associated with disease-specific survival (DSS). METHODS The study used linked data for 24,190 women with a T1 (≤ 20 mm) breast cancer who underwent surgery from 2005 to 2019. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model predictors of receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy and a multinomial model was used to examine factors associated with type(s) of treatment received. RESULTS Overall, 70.3% had BCS, with a reduced likelihood of BCS observed for younger women (p < 0.001), rural residence, (p < 0.001), socioeconomic disadvantage (p = 0.004), higher tumour grade (p < 0.001) and surgery in a public versus private hospital (p < 0.001). Compared to women who received BCS and radiation therapy (RT), those having mastectomy alone or mastectomy plus RT were more likely to be younger (p < 0.001), live in a rural area (p < 0.001), have higher-grade tumours (p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001). Overall 5-year survival was 95.3% and breast cancer-specific survival was 98.3%. Highest survival was observed for women having BCS and RT and lowest for those having mastectomy and RT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our results indicate some variation in the management of early-stage breast cancer. Lower rates of BCS were observed for rural and disadvantaged women and for those treated in a public or low-volume hospital. Whilst survival was high for this cohort, differences in tumour biology likely explain the differences in survival according to treatment type.
Collapse
|
4
|
Merie R, Shafiq J, Soon PS, Delaney GP. Surgical and radiotherapy patterns of care in the management of breast cancer in NSW and ACT Australia. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 66:442-454. [PMID: 34851031 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aims to report on the surgical and radiotherapy patterns of breast cancer care in New South Wales (NSW) and Australian Capital Territory (ACT) in Australia, to identify factors that impact on utilisation of evidence-based treatment and to report on the overall survival (OS) rate and the influencing factors on OS. METHODS Cancer registry data linked to hospital records for all patients with breast cancer diagnosis in NSW and ACT between 2009 and 2014 were used to calculate rates of breast conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis used to identify factors that led to variations in care. 5-year OS was calculated and cox regression model assessed factors that influenced survival. RESULTS Data for 30,337 patients were analysed. BCS and mastectomy rates were 64% and 36%, respectively. The SLNB, ALND and ALND after SLNB rates were 61.5%, 32.1% and 6.4%, respectively. Radiotherapy was utilised in 63%. Younger age, socio-economic disadvantage, longer distance to a radiotherapy facility and overseas place of birth were factors that predicted for increased rates of mastectomy and ALND. Radiotherapy was more likely to be utilised in later years of diagnosis, patients between 40-69 years old, and those who lived in major cities and closer to a radiotherapy facility. 5-year OS was 80.5%. Older patients, the socioeconomically disadvantaged and those advanced tumours had worse survival. CONCLUSION Variations in breast cancer care continue to exist in certain patient groups that we identified. Targeted strategic planning and further research to identify other drivers of existing disparities remain a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Merie
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jesmin Shafiq
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patsy S Soon
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital, Bankstown, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,BreastScreen South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoff P Delaney
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lindsay D, Bates N, Diaz A, Watt K, Callander E. Quantifying the hospital and emergency department costs for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2141-2150. [PMID: 34676449 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06570-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With increasing rates of cancer survival due to advances in screening and treatment options, the costs of breast cancer diagnoses are attracting interest. However, limited research has explored the costs to the Australian healthcare system associated with breast cancer. We aimed to describe the cost to hospital funders for hospital episodes and emergency department (ED) presentations for Queensland women with breast cancer, and whether costs varied by demographic characteristics. METHODS We used a linked administrative dataset, CancerCostMod, limited to all breast cancer diagnoses aged 18 years or over in Queensland between July 2011 and June 2015 (n = 13,285). Each record was linked to Queensland Health Admitted Patient Data Collection and Emergency Department Information Systems records between July 2011 and June 2018. The cost of hospital episodes and ED presentations were determined, with mean costs per patient modelled using generalised linear models with a gamma distribution and log link function. RESULTS The total cost to the Queensland healthcare system from hospital episodes for female breast cancer was AUD$309 million and AUD$12.6 million for ED presentations during the first 3 years following diagnosis. High levels of costs and service use were identified in the first 6 months following diagnosis. Some significant differences in cost of hospital and ED episodes were identified based on demographic characteristics, with Indigenous women and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds having higher costs. CONCLUSION Hospitalisation costs for breast cancer in Queensland exert a high burden on the healthcare system. Costs are higher for women during the first 6 months from diagnosis and for Indigenous women, as well as those with underlying comorbidities and lower socioeconomic position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Nicole Bates
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Abbey Diaz
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kerrianne Watt
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Agha N, Rind RD. Beliefs and perceptions about breast cancer among the people living in rural and less privileged areas in Sindh, Pakistan. HEALTH EDUCATION 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/he-10-2020-0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PurposeGlobally, women suffer from a lack of knowledge about breast cancer (BC), its symptoms and treatment. The purpose of this paper is to examine how people living in rural and less developed areas in Pakistan perceive BC. The study investigates the level of knowledge about BC in rural communities and analyses how the prevalent perceptions and beliefs impact women's lives and delay the diagnosis.Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on 42 in-depth interviews with the women who have undergone BC treatment during the past five years. The participants were interviewed were the residents of the northern Sindh, southern Pakistan.FindingsFindings show that BC was perceived as a contagious disease transmitted through touching or being physically close to the patient. Some women were abandoned by their husbands because of this perception. Faith in fatalism and the perception that BC is an incurable disease were common in communities with low socio-economic status. This is likely to affect the prevention and early detection of BC.Originality/valueThe study shows a strong co-relation of awareness with the prevalent perceptions regarding BC. Therefore, we recommend promoting health literacy and introducing culturally specific interventions in remote communities to enhance their understanding of the available treatment and help remove misconceptions about BC.
Collapse
|
7
|
Kou K, Dasgupta P, Aitken JF, Baade PD. Impact of area-level socioeconomic status and accessibility to treatment on life expectancy after a cancer diagnosis in Queensland, Australia. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 69:101803. [PMID: 32927295 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study quantifies geographic inequities in loss of life expectancy (LOLE) by area-level socioeconomic status (SES) and accessibility to treatment. METHODS Analysis was conducted using a population-based cancer-registry cohort (n = 371,570) of Queensland (Australia) residents aged 50-89 years, diagnosed between 1997-2016. Flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate LOLE by area-level SES and accessibility for all invasive cancers and the five leading cancers. The gain in life years that could be achieved if all cancer patients experienced the same relative survival as those in the least disadvantaged-high accessibility category was estimated for the 2016 cohort. RESULTS For all invasive cancers, men living in the most disadvantaged areas lost 34 % of life expectancy due to their cancer diagnosis, while those from the least disadvantaged areas lost 25 %. The corresponding percentages for women were 33 % and 23 %. Accessibility had a lower impact on LOLE than SES, with patients from low accessibility areas losing 0-4 % more life expectancy than those from high accessibility areas. For cancer patients diagnosed in 2016 (n = 24,423), an estimated 101,387 life years will be lost. This would be reduced by 19 % if all patients experienced the same relative survival as those from the least disadvantaged-high accessibility areas. CONCLUSION The impact of a cancer diagnosis on remaining life expectancy varies by geographical area. Establishing reasons why area disadvantage impacts on life expectancy is crucial to inform subsequent interventions that could increase the life expectancy of cancer patients from more disadvantaged areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kou Kou
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter D Baade
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Factors associated with being diagnosed with high severity of breast cancer: a population-based study in Queensland, Australia. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:937-950. [PMID: 32926317 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05905-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explores factors that are associated with the severity of breast cancer (BC) at diagnosis. METHODS Interviews were conducted among women (n = 3326) aged 20-79 diagnosed with BC between 2011 and 2013 in Queensland, Australia. High-severity cancers were defined as either Stage II-IV, Grade 3, or having negative hormone receptors at diagnosis. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of high severity BC for variables relating to screening, lifestyle, reproductive habits, family history, socioeconomic status, and area disadvantage. RESULTS Symptom-detected women had greater odds (OR 3.38, 2.86-4.00) of being diagnosed with high-severity cancer than screen-detected women. Women who did not have regular mammograms had greater odds (OR 1.78, 1.40-2.28) of being diagnosed with high-severity cancer than those who had mammograms biennially. This trend was significant in both screen-detected and symptom-detected women. Screen-detected women who were non-smokers (OR 1.77, 1.16-2.71), postmenopausal (OR 2.01, 1.42-2.84), or employed (OR 1.46, 1.15-1.85) had greater odds of being diagnosed with high-severity cancer than those who were current smokers, premenopausal, or unemployed. Symptom-detected women being overweight (OR 1.67, 1.31-2.14), postmenopausal (OR 2.01, 1.43-2.82), had hormone replacement therapy (HRT) < 2 years (OR 1.60, 1.02-2.51) had greater odds of being diagnosed with high-severity cancer than those of healthy weight, premenopausal, had HRT > 10 years. CONCLUSION Screen-detected women and women who had mammograms biennially had lower odds of being diagnosed with high-severity breast cancer, which highlighted the benefit of regular breast cancer screening. Women in subgroups who are more likely to have more severe cancers should be particularly encouraged to participate in regular mammography screening.
Collapse
|
9
|
Imanian M, Imanian M, Karimyar M. Sleep Quality and Fatigue among Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res 2019; 13:196-200. [PMID: 31871594 PMCID: PMC6925361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer survivors make up a growing population facing treatment that poses long - standing adverse effects including chemotherapy- related sleep disorders and fatigue. There is limited knowledge of patients' lived experiences of chemotherapy- induced sleep disorders and fatigue. The aim of this study was to explore sleep quality and fatigue among breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifteen patients were included in this census-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Brief Fatigue Inventory four days after the chemotherapy session. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software version 13 and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Results: The mean hours of sleep were 5.6±1.83 in the range of 2 to 10 hours. The mean score of fatigue of participants was 5.59±1.67. Based on the cutting point, 57.4%, 20.9%, and 21.7% of participants had a moderate (4-6.9), mild (0.1-3.9), and severe (7-9.9) level of fatigue, respectively. The mean score of sleep quality among the participants was equal to 14.06±3.06, with a maximum and minimum of 7 and 21. The results of Spearman correlation coefficient showed that there is a significant relationship between fatigue and quality of sleep )0.210). Conclusion: Although the study findings revealed that patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy experience different degrees of sleep disorders and fatigue, there is a need for more detailed studies to improve the quality of sleep and reduce fatigue in these patients due to the little attention paid to this issue in the medical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahrokh Imanian
- Medical Surgical Nursing, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Mahsa Imanian
- Medical Surgical Nursing, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | - Mahdi Karimyar
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ho-Huynh A, Tran A, Bray G, Abbot S, Elston T, Gunnarsson R, de Costa A. Factors influencing breast cancer outcomes in Australia: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13038. [PMID: 30919536 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review evaluates factors influencing breast cancer outcomes for women treated in Australia, facilitating the exploration of disparities in breast cancer outcomes for certain groups of women in Australia. METHOD A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Scopus focusing on breast cancer in Australia with outcome measures being breast cancer survival and recurrence with no restrictions on date. Risk of bias was assessed using Cairns Assessment Scale for Observational studies of Risk factors (CASOR). RESULTS Fifteen quantitative studies were included: two were high quality, 11 were intermediate quality, and two were low quality. Traditional risk factors such as invasive tumour type, larger size, higher grade and stage, lymph node involvement and absence of hormone receptors were found to be associated with breast cancer mortality. Being younger (<40 years old) and older (>70 years old), having more comorbidities, being of lower socioeconomic status, identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, living in more rural areas or having a mastectomy were factors found to be associated with poorer breast cancer outcomes. CONCLUSION Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, this review identified significant risk factors for breast cancer mortality and recurrence. The use of this data would be most useful in developing evidence-based interventions and in optimising patient care through creation of a prediction model. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42017072857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Ho-Huynh
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alex Tran
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gerard Bray
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Samuel Abbot
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Timothy Elston
- Department of Surgery, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ronny Gunnarsson
- Primary Health Care, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Alan de Costa
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dasgupta P, Baade PD, Youlden DR, Garvey G, Aitken JF, Wallington I, Chynoweth J, Zorbas H, Youl PH. Variations in outcomes by residential location for women with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019050. [PMID: 29706597 PMCID: PMC5935167 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically assess the evidence for variations in outcomes at each step along the breast cancer continuum of care for Australian women by residential location. DESIGN Systematic review. METHODS Systematic searches of peer-reviewed articles in English published from 1 January 1990 to 24 November 2017 using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Informit databases. Inclusion criteria were: population was adult female patients with breast cancer; Australian setting; outcome measure was survival, patient or tumour characteristics, screening rates or frequencies, clinical management, patterns of initial care or post-treatment follow-up with analysis by residential location or studies involving non-metropolitan women only. Included studies were critically appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Seventy-four quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Around 59% were considered high quality, 34% moderate and 7% low. No eligible studies examining treatment choices or post-treatment follow-up were identified. Non-metropolitan women consistently had poorer survival, with most of this differential being attributed to more advanced disease at diagnosis, treatment-related factors and socioeconomic disadvantage. Compared with metropolitan women, non-metropolitan women were more likely to live in disadvantaged areas and had differing clinical management and patterns of care. However, findings regarding geographical variations in tumour characteristics or diagnostic outcomes were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS A general pattern of poorer survival and variations in clinical management for Australian female patients with breast cancer from non-metropolitan areas was evident. However, the wide variability in data sources, measures, study quality, time periods and geographical classification made direct comparisons across studies challenging. The review highlighted the need to promote standardisation of geographical classifications and increased comparability of data systems. It also identified key gaps in the existing literature including a lack of studies on advanced breast cancer, geographical variations in treatment choices from the perspective of patients and post-treatment follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramita Dasgupta
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter D Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- None, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Danny R Youlden
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gail Garvey
- Menzies School of Health Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | - Helen Zorbas
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philippa H Youl
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- None, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, Vajdic CM, Crowe PJ, Lujic S, Klaes E, Jorm L, Sedrakyan A. Reoperation after breast-conserving surgery for cancer in Australia: statewide cohort study of linked hospital data. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020858. [PMID: 29643165 PMCID: PMC5898348 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate between-hospital variation in the probability of reoperation within 90 days of initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and the contribution of health system-level and other factors. DESIGN Population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING New South Wales (NSW), Australia. PARTICIPANTS Linked administrative hospitalisation data were used to define a cohort of adult women undergoing initial BCS for breast cancer in NSW between 1 July 2002 and 31 December 2013. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Multilevel, cross-classified models with patients clustered within hospitals and residential areas were used to examine factors associated with any reoperation, and either re-excision or mastectomy, within 90 days. RESULTS Of 34 458 women undergoing BCS, 29.1% underwent reoperation within 90 days, half of which were mastectomies. Overall, the probability of reoperation decreased slightly over time. However, there were divergent patterns by reoperation type; the probability of re-excision increased alongside a concomitant decrease in the probability of mastectomy. Significant between-hospital variation was observed. Non-metropolitan location and surgery at low-volume hospitals were associated with a higher overall probability of reoperation, and of mastectomy specifically, after accounting for patient-level factors, calendar year and area-level socioeconomic status. The magnitude of association with geographical location and surgical volume decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS Reoperation rates within 90 days of BCS varied significantly between hospitals. For women undergoing mastectomy after BCS, this represents a dramatic change in clinical course. Multilevel modelling suggests unwarranted clinical variation may be an issue, likely due to disparities in access to multidisciplinary breast cancer care and preoperative diagnostic procedures. However, the observed reduction in disparities over time is encouraging and indicates that guidelines and policy initiatives have the potential to improve regional breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina T van Leeuwen
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael O Falster
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claire M Vajdic
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip J Crowe
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sanja Lujic
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Klaes
- Breast Cancer Network Australia, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louisa Jorm
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Art Sedrakyan
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dasgupta P, Baade PD, Youlden DR, Garvey G, Aitken JF, Wallington I, Chynoweth J, Zorbas H, Roder D, Youl PH. Variations in outcomes for Indigenous women with breast cancer in Australia: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26:e12662. [PMID: 28186346 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review examines variations in outcomes along the breast cancer continuum for Australian women by Indigenous status. Multiple databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles published from 1 January 1990 to 1 March 2015 focussing on adult female breast cancer patients in Australia and assessing survival, patient and tumour characteristics, diagnosis and treatment by Indigenous status. Sixteen quantitative studies were included with 12 rated high, 3 moderate and 1 as low quality. No eligible studies on referral, treatment choices, completion or follow-up were retrieved. Indigenous women had poorer survival most likely reflecting geographical isolation, advanced disease, patterns of care, comorbidities and disadvantage. They were also more likely to be diagnosed when younger, have advanced disease or comorbidities, reside in disadvantaged or remote areas, and less likely to undergo mammographic screening or surgery. Despite wide heterogeneity across studies, an overall pattern of poorer survival for Indigenous women and variations along the breast cancer continuum of care was evident. The predominance of state-specific studies and small numbers of included Indigenous women made forming a national perspective difficult. The review highlighted the need to improve Indigenous identification in cancer registries and administrative databases and identified key gaps notably the lack of qualitative studies in current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Dasgupta
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - P D Baade
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - D R Youlden
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - G Garvey
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - J F Aitken
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia
| | - I Wallington
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J Chynoweth
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - H Zorbas
- Cancer Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D Roder
- Centre for Population Health Research, Samson Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - P H Youl
- Viertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dasgupta P, Youl PH, Aitken JF, Turrell G, Baade P. Geographical differences in risk of advanced breast cancer: Limited evidence for reductions over time, Queensland, Australia 1997-2014. Breast 2017; 36:60-66. [PMID: 28985515 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing geographical inequalities in breast cancer stage remains a key focus of public health policy. We explored whether patterns of advanced breast cancer by residential accessibility and disadvantage in Queensland, Australia, have changed over time. METHODS Population-based cancer registry study of 38,706 women aged at least 30 years diagnosed with a first primary invasive breast cancer of known stage between 1997 and 2014. Multilevel logistic regression was used to examine temporal changes in associations of area-level factors with odds of advanced disease after adjustment for individual-level factors. RESULTS Overall 19,401 (50%) women had advanced breast cancer. Women from the most disadvantaged areas had higher adjusted odds (OR = 1.23 [95%CI 1.13, 1.32]) of advanced disease than those from least disadvantaged areas, with no evidence this association had changed over time (interaction p = 0.197). Living in less accessible areas independently increased the adjusted odds (OR = 1.18 [1.09, 1.28]) of advanced disease, with some evidence that the geographical inequality had reduced over time (p = 0.045). Sensitivity analyses for un-staged cases showed that the original associations remained, regardless of assumptions made about the true stage distribution. CONCLUSIONS Both geographical and residential socioeconomic inequalities in advanced stage diagnoses persist, potentially reflecting barriers in accessing diagnostic services. Given the role of screening mammography in early detection of breast cancer, the lack of population-based data on private screening limits our ability to determine overall participation rates by residential characteristics. Without such data, the efficacy of strategies to reduce inequalities in breast cancer stage will remain compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramita Dasgupta
- Cancer Council Queensland, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia.
| | - Philippa H Youl
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia.
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Council Queensland, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Herston Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia; School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Gavin Turrell
- Institute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, 3065, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Peter Baade
- Cancer Council Queensland, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia; School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baade P. Geographical Variation in Breast Cancer Outcomes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2017; 14:ijerph14050523. [PMID: 28498324 PMCID: PMC5451974 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14050523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Academic Contribution Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, P.O. Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|