1
|
Gigot C, Pisanic N, Spicer K, Davis MF, Kruczynski K, Gregory Rivera M, Koehler K, Hall DJ, Hall DJ, Heaney CD. SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence by industry, workplace characteristics, and workplace infection prevention and control measures, North Carolina, USA, 2021 to 2022. Ann Work Expo Health 2024; 68:881-889. [PMID: 39102901 PMCID: PMC11427537 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxae067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected workers in certain industries and occupations, and the workplace can be a high-risk setting for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In this study, we measured SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence and identified work-related risk factors in a population primarily working at industrial livestock operations. We used a multiplex salivary SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay to determine infection-induced antibody prevalence among 236 adult (≥18 yr) North Carolina residents between February 2021 and August 2022. We used the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Industry and Occupation Computerized Coding System (NIOCCS) to classify employed participants' industry. Most participants (55%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 49% to 62%) were infection-induced IgG positive, including 71% (95% CI 60% to 83%) of animal slaughtering and processing industry workers, 1.5 to 4.3 times North Carolina general population infection-induced seroprevalence estimates during overlapping time periods. Considering self-reported diagnostic test positivity and vaccination history in addition to antibodies, the proportion of participants with evidence of prior infection increased slightly to 61% (95% CI 55% to 67%), including 75% (95% CI 64% to 87%) of animal slaughtering and processing workers. Participants with more than 1000 compared to 10 or fewer coworkers at their jobsite had higher odds of prior infection (adjusted odds ratio 4.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 21.0). This study contributes evidence of the severe and disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 on animal slaughtering and processing workers and workers in large congregate settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Gigot
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Nora Pisanic
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kristoffer Spicer
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Meghan F Davis
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Johns Hopkins P.O.E. Total Worker Health(R) Center in Mental Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kate Kruczynski
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Magdielis Gregory Rivera
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kirsten Koehler
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - D J Hall
- Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help, Warsaw, NC, United States
| | - Devon J Hall
- Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help, Warsaw, NC, United States
| | - Christopher D Heaney
- Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Community Science and Innovation for Environmental Justice Initiative, Center for a Livable Future, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kooh P, Guillois Y, Federighi M, Pivette M, Maillard AL, Luong NDM, Chaix E. Mitigating COVID-19 in meat processing plants: what have we learned from cluster investigations? Front Public Health 2024; 12:1432332. [PMID: 39286744 PMCID: PMC11402690 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1432332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Several COVID-19 outbreaks have been reported in meat processing plants in different countries. The aim of this study was to assess the environmental and socio-economic risk factors favouring the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in meat processing plants and to describe the prevention measures implemented. Methods Data from epidemiological investigations of COVID-19 clusters in France, the scientific literature, structured interviews and site visits were collected and summarised to investigate the main risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in meat processing plants, including determinants within and outside the workplace. Results An increased risk of infection was identified among workers with unfavourable socio-economic status (temporary/non-permanent workers, migrants, ethnic minorities, etc.), possibly related to community activities (house-sharing, car-sharing, social activities). Working conditions (proximity between workers) and environmental factors (low temperatures and inadequate ventilation) also appear to be important risk factors. These environmental conditions are particularly prevalent in cutting and boning plants, where the majority of reported cases are concentrated. Preventive measures applied included screening for COVID-19 symptoms, testing, wearing masks, increased hygiene and sanitation, physical and temporal distancing, control of ventilation. Certain food safety hygiene measures were compatible with protecting workers from SARS-CoV-2. The hygiene culture of agri-food workers made it easier to implement preventive measures after adaptation. Conclusion This study made it possible to identify the environmental and socio-economic factors conducive to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in meat processing plants. The knowledge gained from this work was used in simulations to understand the transmission of the virus in the plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Kooh
- Risk Assessment Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Yvonnick Guillois
- Santé publique France, Direction des régions, Bretagne, Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Michel Federighi
- HQSA, EnvA, Maisons-Alfort, France
- UMR INRAE 1014 SECALIM, Oniris, Nantes, France
| | - Mathilde Pivette
- Santé publique France, Direction des régions, Bretagne, Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Anne-Laure Maillard
- Santé publique France, Direction des régions, Bretagne, Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Ngoc-Du Martin Luong
- Risk Assessment Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Estelle Chaix
- Risk Assessment Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Maisons-Alfort, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gilham EL, Raja AI, van Veldhoven K, Nicholls G, Sandys V, Atkinson B, Spencer A, Nicholls I, Cooke J, Bennett A, Morgan D, Keen C, Fletcher T, Pearce N, Manley P, Brickley EB, Chen Y. A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a public order and safety training facility in England, June 2021. Ann Work Expo Health 2024; 68:770-776. [PMID: 38785326 DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxae038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The public order and safety (POS) sector remains susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks, as workplace attendance is typically compulsory and close physical contact is often needed. Here, we report on a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak with an attack rate of 39% (9/23), which occurred between 19 and 29 June 2021 among a cohort of new POS recruits participating in a mandatory 18-week training programme in England. METHODS The COVID-OUT (COVID-19 Outbreak investigation to Understand Transmission) study team undertook a multidisciplinary outbreak investigation, including viral surface sampling, workplace environmental assessment, participant viral and antibody testing, and questionnaires, at the two associated training facilities between 5 July and 24 August 2021. RESULTS Environmental factors, such as ventilation, were deemed inadequate in some areas of the workplace, with carbon dioxide (CO2) levels exceeding 1,500 ppm on multiple occasions within naturally ventilated classrooms. Activities during safety training required close contact, with some necessitating physical contact, physical exertion, and shouting. Furthermore, most participants reported having physical contact with colleagues (67%) and more than one close work contact daily (97%). CONCLUSIONS Our investigation suggests that site- and activity-specific factors likely contributed to the transmission risks within the POS trainee cohort. Potential interventions for mitigating SARS-CoV-2 transmission in this POS training context could include implementing regular rapid lateral flow testing, optimizing natural ventilation, using portable air cleaning devices in classrooms, and expanding use of well-fitted FFP2/FFP3 respirators during activities where prolonged close physical contact is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie L Gilham
- Rapid Investigation Team, Field Services, UK Health Security Agency, Wellington House, Waterloo Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amber I Raja
- Health Equity Action Lab, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology & International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karin van Veldhoven
- Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Nicholls
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, United Kingdom
| | - Vince Sandys
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, United Kingdom
| | - Barry Atkinson
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Antony Spencer
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Nicholls
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Joan Cooke
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, United Kingdom
| | - Allan Bennett
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Morgan
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Keen
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, United Kingdom
| | - Tony Fletcher
- Chemical and Environmental Effects Department, UK Health Security Agency, Harwell Campus, Chilton, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Pearce
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - Petra Manley
- Rapid Investigation Team, Field Services, UK Health Security Agency, Wellington House, Waterloo Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth B Brickley
- Health Equity Action Lab, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology & International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yiqun Chen
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rhodes S, Beale S, Daniels S, Gittins M, Mueller W, McElvenny D, van Tongeren M. Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review. Eur Respir Rev 2024; 33:240044. [PMID: 39293853 PMCID: PMC11409055 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Workplace features such as ventilation, temperature and the extent of contact are all likely to relate to personal risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Occupations relating to healthcare, social care, education, transport and food production and retail are thought to have increased risks, but the extent to which these risks are elevated and how they have varied over time is unclear. METHODS We searched for population cohort studies conducted in Europe that compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes between two or more different occupational groups. Data were extracted on relative differences between occupational groups, split into four time-periods corresponding to pandemic waves. RESULTS We included data from 17 studies. 11 studies used SARS-CoV-2 as their outcome measure and six used COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality. During waves one and two, the majority of studies saw elevated risks in the five groups that we looked at. Only seven studies used data from wave three onwards. Elevated risks were observed in waves three and four for social care and education workers in some studies. CONCLUSIONS Evidence relating to occupational differences in COVID-19 outcomes in Europe largely focuses on the early part of the pandemic. There is consistent evidence that the direction and magnitude of differences varied with time. Workers in the healthcare, transport and food production sectors saw highly elevated risks in the early part of the pandemic in the majority of studies but this did not appear to continue. There was evidence that elevated risks of infection in the education and social care sectors may have persisted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Rhodes
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Beale
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Daniels
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Gittins
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Damien McElvenny
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Martie van Tongeren
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Thomas Ashton Institute for Risk and Regulatory Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raja AI, Nicholls G, Coldwell M, van Veldhoven K, Sandys V, Atkinson B, Nicholls I, Spencer A, Graham A, Higgins H, Atchison C, Keen C, Fletcher T, Pearce N, Brickley EB, Chen Y. A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak investigation at a storage and distribution centre in England: an assessment of worker- and workplace-related risk factors. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9561. [PMID: 38671031 PMCID: PMC11053053 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
An outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 (1 March to 10 May 2021) with an attack rate of 26.5% among approximately 1150 workers at a storage and distribution centre in England prompted a multidisciplinary outbreak investigation (5 May to 6 August 2021), with the aim of better understanding worker- and workplace-related risk factors for viral transmission in the warehousing sector. Overall, environmental factors (e.g., ventilation, humidity and temperature) were assessed to be appropriate at the facility. Nevertheless, 39 (51.3%) surface samples from across the site tested positive for low/ very low levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (Ct value ≥ 32.0 for all). Among the study participants, of whom 35.6% were confirmed or suspected cases, 95.5% reported having received COVID-19 prevention training, 100.0% reported handwashing, and 80.0% reported use of face coverings at work. Notably, 43.9% and 19.0% reported working with a symptomatic and a positive contact respectively. Furthermore, 80.5% and 46.3% had concerns regarding reduction in their income and future unemployment, respectively, due to self-isolation. The findings of this study suggest that, in addition to targeted workplace infection control measures and tailored work area specific risk assessments, an enhanced and equitable sick leave policy may help limit presenteeism and viral transmission in large workplaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber I Raja
- Health Equity Action Lab, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | - Karin van Veldhoven
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Vince Sandys
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK
| | - Barry Atkinson
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK
| | - Ian Nicholls
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK
| | - Antony Spencer
- Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK
| | - Alice Graham
- Rapid Investigation Team, Field Services, UK Health Security Agency, Wellington House, London, UK
| | - Hannah Higgins
- Rapid Investigation Team, Field Services, UK Health Security Agency, Wellington House, London, UK
| | - Christina Atchison
- Rapid Investigation Team, Field Services, UK Health Security Agency, Wellington House, London, UK
| | - Chris Keen
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK
| | - Tony Fletcher
- Chemical and Environmental Effects Department, UK Health Security Agency, Chilton, UK
| | - Neil Pearce
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth B Brickley
- Health Equity Action Lab, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Yiqun Chen
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Overton CE, Abbey R, Baird T, Christie R, Daniel O, Day J, Gittins M, Jones O, Paton R, Tang M, Ward T, Wilkinson J, Woodrow-Hill C, Aldridge T, Chen Y. Identifying employee, workplace and population characteristics associated with COVID-19 outbreaks in the workplace: a population-based study. Occup Environ Med 2024; 81:92-100. [PMID: 38191477 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify risk factors that contribute to outbreaks of COVID-19 in the workplace and quantify their effect on outbreak risk. METHODS We identified outbreaks of COVID-19 cases in the workplace and investigated the characteristics of the individuals, the workplaces, the areas they work and the mode of commute to work, through data linkages based on Middle Layer Super Output Areas in England between 20 June 2021 and 20 February 2022. We estimated population-level associations between potential risk factors and workplace outbreaks, adjusting for plausible confounders identified using a directed acyclic graph. RESULTS For most industries, increased physical proximity in the workplace was associated with increased risk of COVID-19 outbreaks, while increased vaccination was associated with reduced risk. Employee demographic risk factors varied across industry, but for the majority of industries, a higher proportion of black/African/Caribbean ethnicities and living in deprived areas, was associated with increased outbreak risk. A higher proportion of employees in the 60-64 age group was associated with reduced outbreak risk. There were significant associations between gender, work commute modes and staff contract type with outbreak risk, but these were highly variable across industries. CONCLUSIONS This study has used novel national data linkages to identify potential risk factors of workplace COVID-19 outbreaks, including possible protective effects of vaccination and increased physical distance at work. The same methodological approach can be applied to wider occupational and environmental health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher E Overton
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Tarrion Baird
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Julie Day
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Matthew Gittins
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tom Ward
- UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Jack Wilkinson
- Centre for Biostatistics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Yiqun Chen
- Science Division, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK
| |
Collapse
|