The Mechanism-Based Inactivation of CYP3A4 by Ritonavir: What Mechanism?

Pharmacokinetic analysis of antiviral drug ritonavir across the blood-brain barrier and its interaction with Scutellaria baicalensis using multisite microdialysis in rats

Ritonavir, an excellent inhibitor of CYP3A4, has recently been combined with nirmatrelvir to form Paxlovid for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections. The root of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi (S. baicalensis), a traditional Chinese medicinal (TCM) herb commonly used to treat heat/inflammation in the lung and digestive tracts, which are major organs targeted by viral infections, contains flavones that can influence the CYP3A metabolism pathway. To investigate the ability of ritonavir to cross the bloodbrain barrier (BBB) and its potential herb-drug interactions with an equivalent TCM clinical dose of S. baicalensis, multisite microdialysis coupled with an LCMS/MS system was developed using rat model. Pretreatment with S. baicalensis extract for 5 days, which contains less flavones than those used in previous studies, had a significant influence on ritonavir, resulting in a 2-fold increase in the total concentration of flavones in the blood and brain. Treatment also boosted the maximum blood concentration of flavones by 1.5-fold and the maximum brain concentration of flavones by 2-fold, all the while exerting no noticeable influence on the transfer ratio across the bloodbrain barrier. These experimental results demonstrated that the use of a typical traditional Chinese medicinal dose of S. baicalensis is sufficient to influence the metabolic pathway and synergistically increase the concentration of ritonavir in rats.

Paxlovid™ reduces the incidence of pneumonia, hospitalization, and death in a cohort of COVID-19 patients from northeast Mexico

BACKGROUND

Information on Paxlovid™ effectiveness must be monitored and updated in real world scenarios. Our research question was what is the effectiveness of Paxlovid™ in adult patients with COVID-19? Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness of Paxlovid™ on reducing the incidence of pneumonia, hospitalization, and mortality in a cohort of COVID-19 positive adult patients from northeast Mexico.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 positive adult patients from Nuevo Leon, Mexico from December 2020 to May 2023 (after Omicron BA-5 circulation) was performed. Paxlovid™ use was authorized in September 2022. Therefore, we analyzed effectiveness in patients with confirmed diagnosis who met selection criteria between September 2022 and May 2023 (n = 20,799; 5,673 with and 15,126 without Paxlovid™).

RESULTS

The pneumonia (0.1% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.0001), hospitalization (0.1% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001), and death rates (0.04% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.0001) were lower in patients with Paxlovid™ treatment independently of age, sex, comorbidity, and COVID-19 and pneumococcal vaccination history. Effectiveness was 88.2%, 95.9% y 91.9% for pneumonia, hospitalization, and death, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Paxlovid™ reduces the presentation of pneumonia, hospitalization, and death secondary to COVID-19. It is recommended to continue monitoring Paxlovid™ effectiveness, as other SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emerge.

Interaction of CYP3A4 with the inhibitor cobicistat: Structural and mechanistic insights and comparison with ritonavir

Cobicistat is a derivative of ritonavir marketed as a pharmacoenhancer for anti-HIV therapy. This study investigated the interaction of cobicistat with the target protein, drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), at the molecular level using spectral, kinetic, functional, and structural approaches. It was found that, similar to ritonavir, cobicistat directly coordinates to the heme via the thiazole nitrogen but its affinity and the binding rate are 2-fold lower: 0.030 μM and 0.72 s-1, respectively. The newly determined 2.5 Å crystal structure of cobicistat-bound CYP3A4 suggests that these changes arise from the inability of cobicistat to H-bond to the active site S119 and establish multiple stabilizing contacts with the F-F' connecting fragment, which becomes disordered upon steric clashing with the bulky morpholine moiety. Nonetheless, cobicistat inhibits recombinant CYP3A4 as potently as ritonavir (IC50 of 0.24 μM vs 0.22 μM, respectively) due to strong ligation to the heme and formation of extensive hydrophobic/aromatic interactions via the phenyl side-groups. To get insights into the inhibitory mechanism, the K257 residue, known to be solely and irreversibly modified by the reactive ritonavir metabolite, was substituted with alanine. Neither this nor control K266A mutation changed the extent of time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 by cobicistat and ritonavir, suggesting the existence of alternative inactivation mechanism(s). More importantly, K257 was found to be functionally important and contributed to CYP3A4 allosterism, possibly by modulating protein-ligand interactions through conformational dynamics.

Triazole antifungal drug interactions-practical considerations for excellent prescribing

Systemic antifungal therapy is critical for reducing the mortality from many invasive and chronic fungal infections. Triazole antifungals are the most frequently prescribed antifungals but require attention to dosing and drug interactions. Nearly 600 severe drug-drug interactions and over 1100 moderate interactions requiring dose modifications are described or anticipated with systemic antifungal agents (see https://www.aspergillus.org.uk/antifungal-drug-interactions/). In this article, we address the common and less common, but serious, drug interactions observed in clinical practice with triazole antifungals, including a group of drugs that cannot be prescribed with all or most triazole antifungals (ivabradine, ranolazine, eplerenone, fentanyl, apomorphine, quetiapine, bedaquiline, rifampicin, rifabutin, sirolimus, phenytoin and carbamazepine). We highlight interactions with drugs used in children and new agents introduced for the treatment of haematological malignancies or graft versus host disease (midostaurin, ibrutinib, ruxolitinib and venetoclax). We also summarize the multiple interactions between oral and inhaled corticosteroids and triazole antifungals, and the strategies needed to optimize the therapeutic benefits of triazole antifungal therapy while minimizing potential harm to patients.

Ritonavir: 25 Years' Experience of Concomitant Medication Management. A Narrative Review

Ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme and is commonly used as a pharmacokinetic (PK) enhancer in antiviral therapies because it increases bioavailability of concomitantly administered antivirals. Decades of experience with ritonavir-enhanced HIV therapies and, more recently, COVID-19 therapies demonstrate that boosting doses of ritonavir are well tolerated, with an established safety profile. The mechanisms of PK enhancement by ritonavir result in the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with several classes of drugs, thus making co-medication management an important consideration with enhanced antiviral therapies. However, rates of DDIs with contraindicated medications are low, suggesting these risks are manageable by infectious disease specialists who have experience with the use of PK enhancers. In this review, we provide an overview of ritonavir's mechanisms of action and describe approaches and resources available to mitigate adverse events and manage concomitant medication in both chronic and short-term settings.

Time Course of the Interaction Between Oral Short-Term Ritonavir Therapy with Three Factor Xa Inhibitors and the Activity of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

We investigated the effect of a 5-day low-dose ritonavir therapy, as it is used in the treatment of COVID-19 with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, on the pharmacokinetics of three factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI). Concurrently, the time course of the activities of the cytochromes P450 (CYP) 3A4, 2C19, and 2D6 was assessed.

METHODS

In an open-label, fixed sequence clinical trial, the effect and duration of a 5-day oral ritonavir (100 mg twice daily) treatment on the pharmacokinetics of three oral microdosed FXaI (rivaroxaban 25 µg, apixaban 25 µg, and edoxaban 50 µg) and microdosed probe drugs (midazolam 25 µg, yohimbine 50 µg, and omeprazole 100 µg) was evaluated in eight healthy volunteers. The plasma concentrations of all drugs were quantified using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods and pharmacokinetics were analysed using non-compartmental analyses.

RESULTS

Ritonavir increased the exposure of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, but to a different extent the observed area under the plasma concentration-time curve (geometric mean ratio 1.29, 1.46, and 1.87, respectively). A strong CYP3A4 inhibition (geometric mean ratio > 10), a moderate CYP2C19 induction 2 days after ritonavir (0.64), and no alteration of CYP2D6 were observed. A CYP3A4 recovery half-life of 2.3 days was determined.

CONCLUSION

This trial with three microdosed FXaI suggests that at most the rivaroxaban dose should be reduced during short-term ritonavir, and only in patients receiving high maintenance doses. Thorough time series analyses demonstrated differential effects on three different drug-metabolising enzymes over time with immediate profound inhibition of CYP3A4 and only slow recovery after discontinuation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number: 2021-006643-39.

Adverse events related to drug-drug interactions in COVID-19 patients. A persistent concern in the post-pandemic era: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Since COVID-19 patients are often polytreated, monitoring drug-drug interaction (DDIs) is necessary. We evaluated whether drugs used after the second COVID-19 pandemic wave were associated with DDI-related adverse events and the role of drug interaction checkers in identifying them.

METHODS

The study (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42024507634) included: 1) consulting the drug interaction checkers Drugs.com, Liverpool COVID-19 Interactions, LexiComp, Medscape, and Micromedex; 2) systematic review; 3) reviewed studies analysis; 4) evaluating drug interaction checkers potential to anticipate DDI-related adverse events.The systematic review was performed searching PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases from 1 March 2022 to 11 November 2023. Observational studies, and clinical trials were included. Article without reporting direct association between DDIs and adverse events were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

The most frequent DDIs involved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/R) and fluvoxamine. Fifteen studies, including 150 patients and 35 DDI-related outcomes, were analyzed. The most frequent DDIs involved tacrolimus with N/R, resulting in creatinine increase.Eighty percent of reported DDI-related adverse events would have been identified by all drug-interaction checkers, while the remaining 20% by at least 2 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug interaction checkers are useful but show inconsistencies. Multiple sources are needed to tailor treatment in the context of COVID-19.

Effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in kidney transplant recipients with severe kidney dysfunction infected with COVID-19

Transplant patients face an elevated risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality and commonly encounter renal dysfunction. Nirmatrelvir is primarily excreted through the kidneys. The dosage of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) needs to be adjusted according to the degree of renal function impairment. Nevertheless, NR is not recommended for patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min) due to a dearth of associated research. In this study, we focus on kidney transplant patients and document and analyze the experiences of using NR in individuals with severe kidney dysfunction. This was a retrospective multicenter study that included transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 in five major tertiary hospitals in China from December 2022 to June 2023. The outcomes consisted of the disease progression rate by day 28, individual disease progression events, safety outcomes, information on adverse events (AEs), and the blood drug concentrations of immunosuppressants. Data were presented with descriptive statistics. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22. In total, 40 patients were included in the analysis. Considering the potential interaction between drugs, all patients temporarily discontinued their immunosuppressants during the NR treatment. None of the 32 moderate patients experienced disease progression. However, among the eight patients with critical COVID-19, unfortunately, two of them died. During the medication period, four patients experienced a total of six AEs associated with NR. None of them experienced AEs with a maximum grade of ≥3. Blood drug concentrations of immunosuppressants were monitored in 22 of 40 patients, and the blood drug concentrations of immunosuppressants did not show a significant increase, but some patients experienced lower blood drug concentrations. Our findings supported the use of NR therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 in transplant patients with severe renal insufficiency. A modified dose of NR was well-tolerated.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of ritonavir-oxycodone drug interactions and its implication for dosing strategy

The concomitant administration of ritonavir and oxycodone may significantly increase the plasma concentrations of oxycodone. This study was aimed to simulate DDI between ritonavir and oxycodone, a widely used opioid, and to formulate dosing protocols for oxycodone by using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. We developed a ritonavir PBPK model incorporating induction and competitive and time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A4 and competitive inhibition of CYP2D6. The ritonavir model was evaluated with observed clinical pharmacokinetic data and validated for its CYP3A4 inhibition potency. We then used the model to simulate drug interactions between oxycodone and ritonavir under various dosing scenarios. The developed model captured the pharmacokinetic characteristics of ritonavir from clinical studies. The model also accurately predicts exposure changes of midazolam, triazolam, and oxycodone in the presence of ritonavir. According to model simulations, the steady-state maximum, minimum and average concentrations of oxycodone increased by up to 166% after co-administration with ritonavir, and the total exposure increased by approximately 120%. To achieve similar steady-state concentrations, halving the dose with an unchanged dosing interval or doubling the dosing interval with an unaltered single dose should be practical for oxycodone, whether formulated in uncoated or controlled-release tablets during long-term co-medication with ritonavir. The results revealed exposure-related risks of oxycodone-ritonavir interactions that have not been studied clinically and emphasized PBPK as a workable method to direct judicious dosage.

Effect of rifampicin administration on CYP induction in a dermatomyositis patient with vasospastic angina attributable to nilmatrelvir/ritonavir-induced blood tacrolimus elevation: A case report

Ritonavir (RTV), which is used in combination with nilmatrelvir (NMV) to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, thereby increasing blood tacrolimus (TAC) levels through a drug-drug interaction (DDI). We experienced a case in which a DDI between the two drugs led to markedly increased blood TAC levels, resulting in vasospastic angina (VSA) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Rifampicin (RFP) was administered to induce CYP3A and promote TAC metabolism. A 60-year-old man with dermatomyositis who was taking 3 mg/day TAC contracted COVID-19. The patient started oral NMV/RTV therapy, and he was admitted to the hospital after 4 days because of chest pain and AKI. On day 5, his blood TAC level increased markedly to 119.8 ng/mL. RFP 600 mg was administered once daily for 3 days, and his blood TAC level decreased to the therapeutic range of 9.6 ng/mL on day 9, leading to AKI improvement. Transient complete atrioventricular block and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were present during chest pain. In the coronary spasm provocation test, complete occlusion was observed in the right coronary artery, leading to a diagnosis of VSA. VSA and AKI are possible side effects of high blood TAC levels caused by DDI, and attention should be paid to cardiovascular side effects such as VSA and AKI associated with increased blood levels of TAC when it is used together with NMV/RTV. When blood levels of TAC increase, oral RFP can rapidly decrease TAC blood levels and potentially reduce its toxicity.

The Design, Synthesis and Mechanism of Action of Paxlovid, a Protease Inhibitor Drug Combination for the Treatment of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has presented an enormous challenge to health care systems and medicine. As a result of global research efforts aimed at preventing and effectively treating SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccines with fundamentally new mechanisms of action and some small-molecule antiviral drugs targeting key proteins in the viral cycle have been developed. The most effective small-molecule drug approved to date for the treatment of COVID-19 is PaxlovidTM, which is a combination of two protease inhibitors, nirmatrelvir and ritonavir. Nirmatrelvir is a reversible covalent peptidomimetic inhibitor of the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2, which enzyme plays a crucial role in viral reproduction. In this combination, ritonavir serves as a pharmacokinetic enhancer, it irreversibly inhibits the cytochrome CYP3A4 enzyme responsible for the rapid metabolism of nirmatrelvir, thereby increasing the half-life and bioavailability of nirmatrelvir. In this tutorial review, we summarize the development and pharmaceutical chemistry aspects of Paxlovid, covering the evolution of protease inhibitors, the warhead design, synthesis and the mechanism of action of nirmatrelvir, as well as the synthesis of ritonavir and its CYP3A4 inhibition mechanism. The efficacy of Paxlovid to novel virus mutants is also overviewed.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of placental transfer of ritonavir as a component of paxlovid using microdialysis in pregnant rats

Background

Ritonavir is one of the most potent CYP3A4 inhibitor currently on the market, and is often used together with other antiviral drugs to increase their bioavailability and efficacy. Paxlovid, consisting of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, was approved for the treatment of COVID-19. As previous studies regarding the use of ritonavir during pregnancy were limited to ex-vivo experiments and systemic safety data, to fully explore the detailed pharmacokinetics of ritonavir in pregnant rats' blood and conceptus, an analytical method consisted of multi-microdialysis coupled with UHPLC-MS/MS were developed to analyze the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir, both as a component of Paxlovid and by itself. 17 days pregnant female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly split into three experimental group: normal dosage of ritonavir alone (7 mg kg-1), normal dosage of Paxlovid (ritonavir 7 mg kg-1 + nirmatrelvir 15 mg kg-1), and 3× dosage of ritonavir (21 mg kg-1).

Results

3× dosage of ritonavir produced a more than 3× increase in rats' blood and placenta. Transfer rate of ritonavir to the placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetus were determined to be 20.7%, 13.8%, and 4.7% respectively. Concentration of ritonavir in the placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetus did not significantly go down after 8 h.

Significance

Overall, ritonavir's metabolism was not influenced by the presence of nirmatrelvir in pregnant rats. A 3× increase in dosage produced a concentration of roughly 4×, most likely a result of ritonavir's auto-inhibition effect on cytochrome P450 proteins. Accumulation of ritonavir is possible in placenta, amniotic fluid, and fetus.

Simultaneous quantification of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in human serum by LC-HRMS

In December 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted emergency authorization for Paxlovid® as an antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Paxlovid® is composed of two tablets, nirmatrelvir and ritonavir. Dose adjustment is necessary in cases of renal insufficiency. The aim of present study is to establish a LC-HRMS method for simultaneous determination of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in human serum for therapeutic drug monitoring. Internal standard saquinavir was added in 25 μL human serum samples, and then the samples were precipitated with methanol. The analytes were separated by gradient elution on a C18 column, using a mobile phase of 0.1 % formic acid-water and methanol, at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The injection volume was 2 μL, and the analysis time was 5 min. The determination of the analytes was performed by electrospray ionization in positive mode by full mass monitoring. The detected ions of nirmatrelvir, ritonavir and saquinavir were m/z 500.24792, 721.32004 and 671.39155, respectively. The linear concentration range for nirmatrelvir was 78.13-20000 ng mL-1, for ritonavir was 15.63-4000 ng mL-1 (r2＞0.9900). The accuracy ranged from 87.45 %∼104.63 %, and the intra-day and inter-day precision RSD was <15 %. The recovery of nirmatrelvir ranged from 98.72 %∼109.83 %, and that of ritonavir was 95.41∼112.36 %. The matrix effect of nirmatrelvir was 88.31∼97.73 %, and that of ritonavir was 85.17∼103.05 %. This method was used to measure the trough concentrations of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in 17 patients. The trough concentration of nirmatrelvir was 1331.7-8352.5 ng/mL, and that of ritonavir was 53.4-1325.5 ng mL-1, with large individual differences. The method is simple, sensitive, specific, and reproducible, and can be used for monitoring the blood concentration and pharmacokinetic study of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in COVID-19 patients.

A Case Report of Drug Interactions Between Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Tacrolimus in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a treatment for COVID-19 consisting of nirmatrelvir, which has anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, and ritonavir, a booster to maintain blood levels. Ritonavir is known to be a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), and interactions with CYP3A-metabolized drugs, such as the immunosuppressant tacrolimus, can be problematic. Ritonavir's inhibition of CYP3A is irreversible due to covalent binding, and its inhibitory effects are expected to persist until replaced by new CYP3A. Here, we report a case where the combination of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and tacrolimus resulted in toxic tacrolimus blood levels. A patient on tacrolimus for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) developed COVID-19 and was prescribed nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. After starting the combination of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and tacrolimus, the patient's tacrolimus blood levels became abnormally high, leading to the discontinuation of these drugs due to symptoms of tacrolimus toxicity. Even after ritonavir blood levels had fallen below the detection limit, the decline in tacrolimus blood levels was delayed. The CYP3A inhibition of ritonavir persists even when its blood concentration decreases, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of concomitant medications before starting nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy. Adjustments or discontinuation may be necessary.

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-induced elevation of blood tacrolimus levels in a patient in the maintenance phase post liver transplantation

Nirmatrelvir is an orally administered anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug used in combination with ritonavir, the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor, to evade metabolism and extend bioavailability. Meanwhile, the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is a CYP3A4/5 substrate, and CYP3A inhibition results in drug-drug interactions. Herein, we report the case of a coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patient in the maintenance phase post liver transplantation, receiving tacrolimus treatment, with a marked increase of blood tacrolimus levels after the initiation of concomitant nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment. A 61-year-old Japanese woman underwent a living donor liver transplant for Caroli disease 25 years ago and received tacrolimus 2 mg/day for immunosuppressive treatment. Three days before the observed high tacrolimus blood concentration, she presented to our emergency department with a fever and was diagnosed with COVID-19. She was prescribed an adjusted dose of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (150 mg/100 mg, twice daily) for 5 days as a high-risk case with immunosuppressive treatment and reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR: 46.6 mL/min/1.73 m2). At the return visit on day 1, blood tacrolimus level was >60 ng/mL on trough sampling, above the upper limit of measurement, with nausea and vomiting as side effects. Tacrolimus treatment was discontinued on the same day. Drug-drug interactions resulting from CYP3A inhibition by nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were deemed responsible for elevated blood tacrolimus levels. Therefore, in liver transplant recipients, tacrolimus dose reduction or discontinuation is required during COVID-19 treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Safety Profile of Paxlovid in the Treatment of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

With the urgent and widespread application of Paxlovid, a novel antiviral drug for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in clinical practice, concerns regarding its actual efficacy and safety have emerged. In order to provide more evidence to support its clinical application, we sought to perform a descriptive analysis of cases who experienced at least one Paxlovid-related adverse event (AEs) and reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) in the post-marketing period.

METHODS

Individual adverse event reports between January 1, 2022 and September 30, 2022, were downloaded from the FAERS website. We completed a descriptive study about the safety of Paxlovid in the treatment of COVID-19. Further, we also analyzed the onset time of Paxlovid-related AEs.

RESULTS

As of 30 September 2022, 16,529 de-duplicated cases were submitted to the FDA, and 5,860 (35.45%) were female. The average age was 58.38 years (S.D. 15.50). Most reports (12,390, 74.96%) were submitted by consumers and 1,436 (8.68%) concerned serious outcomes. The most frequently reported AEs were disease recurrence (7,724, 16.23%), dysgeusia (2,877, 6.05%), and diarrhoea (1,448, 3.04%). The median onset time of Paxlovid-related AEs was 8 days (interquartile range,1-10 days), and most of the cases (2,629, 19.12%) occurred on the day after Paxlovid initiation.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the most common AEs reported with Paxlovid in post-marketing experience are consistent with the safety assessment of antiviral drugs. Even without emerging apparent safety concerns, the incidence of serious outcomes was unexpectedly high, and a few cases of potential new AEs occurred.

Retinopathy Associated With Ritonavir Treatment for HIV Infection: A Case Series Reappraisal in the COVID-19 Era

Purpose: To report 3 cases of retinopathy secondary to ritonavir use in the treatment of HIV. Methods: A retrospective review of patient records was performed for data including ophthalmic examination findings, demographic and HIV clinical characteristics, and progression of maculopathy disease. The review identified 3 patients with a history of HIV treated with antiretroviral therapy including ritonavir who had been evaluated for bilateral vision loss in both eyes. Results: A fundus examination of each patient revealed characteristic macular atrophy, and optical coherence tomography demonstrated corresponding central outer retinal atrophy. Uveitis workup results were unremarkable. Given the characteristics of macular atrophy, history of ritonavir use, and the absence of intraocular inflammation, all 3 patients were diagnosed with bilateral ritonavir-associated retinopathy. Each patients' vision continued to deteriorate, even after the cessation of ritonavir. Conclusions: Ritonavir toxicity should be considered in the differential diagnosis of retinopathy among patients with an exposure history.

Strategies for mitigating adverse events related to selective RET inhibitors in patients with RET-altered cancers

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the selective RET inhibitors selpercatinib and pralsetinib has led to a paradigm change in the treatment of RET-altered lung and thyroid cancers through a higher response rate and a more tolerable safety and toxicity profile than multi-kinase inhibitors. Recently, selpercatinib has received a tissue-agnostic FDA approval for all RET-fusion-positive cancers, and pralsetinib has shown pan-cancer activity as well. Given the anticipated increase in the use of both drugs across multiple tumor types, it is crucial to recognize the possible side effects and approaches for their optimal management in order to maximize the clinical benefit for treated patients. In this review, we underscore potential toxicities associated with selective RET inhibitors and discuss strategies to mitigate them.

Mitigating COVID-19 Mortality and Morbidity in China's Aging Population: A Focus on Available Medications and Future Developments

The COVID-19 pandemic, often referred to as the geropandemic, has put immense pressure on global healthcare systems worldwide, leading to a rush in the development and approval of medications for the treatment of the viral infection. Clinical trials on efficacy and safety had a limited spectrum on inclusion and endpoints because of the urgent need for fast results. The chronologically and biologically aged population is especially at risk for severe or lethal disease, as well as treatment-associated toxicity. In China, the growing elderly population segment has been a focus in public health measurements of COVID-19, guiding towards herd immunity with a mild variant, thus minimizing overall deaths and morbidity. While the COVID-19 pandemic has now been reclassified and the virus weakened, there is a clear need for novel therapies to protect the elderly. This paper reviews the current safety and efficacy of available COVID-19 medications in China, with a specific focus on 3CL protease inhibitors and the aging population. The current COVID wave in China has demonstrated a significant impact on the elderly and the need for new drugs that are effective at low doses and can be used alone, without harmful side effects, generation of viral resistance, and drug-drug interactions. The rush to develop and approve COVID-19 medications has brought up important questions about the balance between speed and caution, resulting in a pipeline of novel therapies now moving through clinical trials, including third-generation 3CL protease inhibitors. A majority of those therapeutics are being developed in China.

Drug-drug interactions between COVID-19 drug therapies and antidepressants

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressants are widely used for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety and mood disorders. Since the eruption of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic and the later development of targeted treatments against COVID-19, inevitably many patients receive antidepressants as well as targeted treatments against COVID-19 against COVID-19. Co-administration of antidepressants with COVID-19 therapeutics has the potential of drug-drug interactions, of varying severity and clinical significance.

AREAS COVERED

This is a curated narrative review of the current state of the art regarding drug-drug interactions between COVID-19 therapeutics and medications licensed for the pharmacotherapy of depression. A systematic search of electronic databases, using as keywords the international nonproprietaty names of currently approved COVID-19 therapeutics and antidepressants was performed, and additionally online interaction checker tools were consulted. Derived data were synthesized for each COVID-19 therapeutic and presented with up-to-date guidance.

EXPERT OPINION

Several COVID-19 therapeutics have potential for drug-drug interactions with antidepressants. Remdesivir and Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir have the higher risk, whereas several monoclonal antibodies appear safer. The most serious drug-drug interactions (serotonin syndrome and QTc prolongation) require close monitoring; however, DDI toward reducing the efficacy of antidepressants may be difficult to recognize. As COVID-19 treatment protocols take precedence, psychiatrists should exert flexibility in antidepressant use and proactively monitor treatment progress.

Metabolic and toxicological considerations regarding CGRP mAbs and CGRP antagonists to treat migraine in COVID-19 patients: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Migraine pharmacological therapies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), including monoclonal antibodies and gepants, have shown clinical effect and optimal tolerability. Interactions between treatments of COVID-19 and CGRP-related drugs have not been reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

An overview of CGRP, a description of the characteristics of each CGRP-related drug and its response predictors, COVID-19 and its treatment, the interactions between CGRP-related drugs and COVID-19 treatment, COVID-19 and vaccination-induced headache, and the neurological consequences of Covid-19.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinicians should be careful about using gepants for COVID-19 patients, due to the potential drug interactions with drugs metabolized via CYP3A4 cytochrome. In particular, COVID-19 treatment (especially nirmatrelvir packaged with ritonavir, as Paxlovid) should be considered cautiously. It is advisable to stop or adjust the dose (10 mg atogepant when used for episodic migraine) of gepants when using Paxlovid (except for zavegepant). CGRP moncolconal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) do not have drug - drug interactions, but a few days' interval between a COVID-19 vaccination and the use of CGRP mAbs is recommended to allow the accurate identification of the possible adverse effects, such as injection site reaction. Covid-19- and vaccination-related headache are known to occur. Whether CGRP-related drugs would be of benefit in these circumstances is not yet known.

Effects of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on midazolam and dabigatran pharmacokinetics in healthy participants

AIMS

To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety after coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone with midazolam (a cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate) and dabigatran (a P-glycoprotein substrate).

METHODS

PK was studied in 2 phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence studies in healthy adults. Single oral doses of midazolam 2 mg (n = 12) or dabigatran 75 mg (n = 24) were administered alone and after steady state (i.e. ≥2 days) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg and ritonavir 100 mg. Midazolam and dabigatran plasma concentrations and adverse events were analysed for each treatment.

RESULTS

After administration of midazolam with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), midazolam geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increased 14.3-fold and 3.7-fold, respectively. Midazolam coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in 16.5-fold and 3.9-fold increases in midazolam geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax , respectively. After administration of dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax increased 1.9-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively. Dabigatran coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax . Midazolam or dabigatran exposures were generally comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, with a slightly higher dabigatran Cmax with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir vs. ritonavir alone. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was generally safe when administered with or without midazolam or dabigatran. No serious or severe adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of midazolam or dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir increased systemic exposure of midazolam or dabigatran. Midazolam exposures were comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, suggesting no incremental effect of nirmatrelvir. Dabigatran Cmax was slightly higher when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with of ritonavir alone, suggesting a minor incremental effect of nirmatrelvir.

Head-to-head comparison of azvudine and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for the hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a real-world retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching

Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and azvudine have been approved for the early treatment of COVID-19 in China, however, limited real-world data exists regarding their effectiveness and safety. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving the hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China between December 2022 and January 2023. Demographic, clinical, and safety variables were recorded. Results: Among the 6,616 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we included a total of 725 patients including azvudine recipients (N = 461) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N = 264) recipients after exclusions and propensity score matching (1:2). There was no significant difference in the composite disease progression events between azvudine (98, 21.26%) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (72, 27.27%) groups (p = 0.066). Azvudine was associated with a significant reduction in secondary outcomes, including the percentage of intensive care unit admission (p = 0.038) and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.035), while the in-hospital death event did not significantly differ (p = 0.991). As for safety outcomes, 33 out of 461 patients (7.16%) in azvudine group and 22 out of 264 patients (8.33%) in nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group experienced drug-related adverse events between the day of admission (p = 0.565). Conclusion: In our real-world setting, azvudine treatment demonstrated similar safety compared to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Additionally, it showed slightly better clinical benefits in this population. However, further confirmation through additional clinical trials is necessary.

A comprehensive evaluation in clinic and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation to confirm lack of cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interaction potential for pomotrelvir

Pomotrelvir is a new chemical entity and potent direct-acting antiviral inhibitor of the main protease of coronaviruses. Here the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of pomotrelvir was evaluated for major CYP isoforms, starting with in vitro assays followed by the basic static model assessment. The identified CYP3A4-mediated potential DDIs were evaluated clinically at a supratherapeutic dose of 1050 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) of pomotrelvir, including pomotrelvir coadministration with ritonavir (strong inhibitor of CYP3A4) or midazolam (sensitive substrate of CYP3A4). Furthermore, a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed within the Simcyp Population-based Simulator using in vitro and in vivo information and validated with available human pharmacokinetic (PK) data. The PBPK model was simulated to assess the DDI potential for CYP isoforms that pomotrelvir has shown a weak to moderate DDI in vitro and for CYP3A4 at the therapeutic dose of 700 mg b.i.d. To support the use of pomotrelvir in women of childbearing potential, the impact of pomotrelvir on the exposure of the representative oral hormonal contraceptive drugs ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel was assessed using the PBPK model. The overall assessment suggested weak inhibition of pomotrelvir on CYP3A4 and minimal impact of a strong CYP3A4 inducer or inhibitor on pomotrelvir PK. Therefore, pomotrelvir is not anticipated to have clinically meaningful DDIs at the clinical dose. These comprehensive in vitro, in clinic, and in silico efforts indicate that the DDI potential of pomotrelvir is minimal, so excluding patients on concomitant medicines in clinical studies would not be required.

In vitro metabolism of triclosan and chemoprevention against its cytotoxicity

Triclosan (TCS), a broad-spectrum antibacterial chemical, has been extensively used in personal daily care items, household commodities, and clinical medications; therefore, humans are at risk of being exposed to TCS in their daily lives. This chemical also accumulated in food chains, and potential risks were associated with its metabolism in vivo. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in metabolic profile of TCS by hepatic P450 enzymes and extrahepatic P450s, and also identify chemical structures of its metabolites. The results showed that RLM mediated the hydroxylation and cleavage of the ether moiety of TCS, resulting in phenolic metabolites that are more polar than the parent compound, including 4-chlorocatechol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and monohydroxylated triclosan. The major metabolite of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 mediated TCS metabolism is 4-chlorochol. We also performed molecular docking experiments to investigate possible binding modes of TCS in the active sites of human CYP1B1, CYP1A1, and CYP3A4. In addition to in vitro experiments, we further examined the cytotoxic effects of TCS on HepG2 cells expressing hepatic P450 and MCF-7/1B1 cells expressing CYP1B1. It exhibited significant cytotoxicity on HepG2, MCF-10A and MCF-7/1B1 cells, with IC50 values of 70 ± 10 μM, 20 ± 10 μM and 60 ± 20 μM, respectively. The co-incubation of TCS with glutathione (GSH) as a chemopreventive agent could reduce the cytotoxicity of TCS in vitro. The chemopreventive effects of GSH might be ascribed to the promotion of TCS efflux mediated by membrane transporter MRP1 and also its antioxidant property, which partially neutralized the oxidative stress of TCS on mammalian cells. This study contributed to our understanding of the relationship between the P450 metabolism and the toxicity of TCS. It also had implications for the use of specific chemopreventive agents against the toxicity of TCS.

Drug-drug interactions and dose management of BTK inhibitors when initiating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (paxlovid) based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models

OBJECTIVE

Co-administration of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is challenging because of potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, clinical trials specifically evaluating such DDIs are absent. To evaluate and quantify the DDIs between them and provide rational dose management strategies of BTK inhibitors, we conducted this study using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.

METHODS

Physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic parameters were acquired from the published literature and databases. The PBPK models were developed using Simcyp® software. These models were validated by comparing with published literature values. The successfully validated PBPK models were used to simulate the plasma concentration-time profiles and DDIs in a virtual healthy population receiving BTK inhibitors alone or with ritonavir.

RESULTS

Simulated plasma concentration-time profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters of each drug were in agreement with clinically observed values from literatures. Ritonavir increased ibrutinib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 33- and 53.88-fold, respectively, increased zanubrutinib Cmax and AUC 2.57- and 3.18-fold, respectively, and increased acalabrutinib Cmax and AUC 3.85- and 6.54-fold, respectively. Based on our simulations, dose-adjustment strategies may consist of ibrutinib at 25 mg q48h, zanubrutinib at 80 mg twice-daily and acalabrutinib at 25 mg twice-daily with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBPK models predicted the in vivo pharmacokinetics and the DDIs of BTK inhibitors and ritonavir. The prospective simulations not only provided scientific evidence regarding rational dosing management strategies when initiating nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy but also provided a reference for the design of clinical DDIs study that may save resources and time.

SUMMARY

Paxlovid could increase Cmax and AUC0-τ of BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib), and dose adjustment strategy of ibrutinib (25 mg q48h), zanubrutinib (80 mg q12h) and acalabrutinib (25 mg q12h) should be considered when combination with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.

Glabridin plays dual action to intensify anti-metastatic potential of paclitaxel via impeding CYP2C8 in liver and CYP2J2/EETs in tumor of an orthotopic mouse model of breast cancer

In spite of unprecedented advances in modern cancer therapy, there is still a dearth of targeted therapy to circumvent triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Paclitaxel is the front-line therapy against TNBC, but the main constraints of its treatment are dose-related adverse effects and emerging chemoresistance. In this context, glabridin (phytoconstituent from Glycyrrhiza glabra) is reported to hit multiple signalling pathways at the in-vitro level, but hardly any information is known at the in-vivo level. We aimed here to elucidate glabridin potential with an underlying mechanism in combination with a low dose of paclitaxel using a highly aggressive mouse mammary carcinoma model. Glabridin potentiated the anti-metastatic efficacy of paclitaxel by substantially curtailing tumor burden and diminishing lung nodule formation. Moreover, glabridin remarkably attenuated epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) traits of hostile cancer cells via up-regulating (E-cadherin & occludin) and down-regulating (Vimentin & Zeb1) vital EMT markers. Besides, glabridin amplified apoptotic induction effect of paclitaxel in tumor tissue by declining or elevating pro-apoptotic (Procaspase-9 or Cleaved Caspase-9 & Bax) and reducing anti-apoptotic (Bcl-2) markers. Additionally, concomitant treatment of glabridin and paclitaxel predominantly lessened CYP2J2 expression with marked lowering of epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET)'s levels in tumor tissue to reinforce the anti-tumor impact. Simultaneous administration of glabridin with paclitaxel notably enhanced plasma exposure and delayed clearance of paclitaxel, which was mainly arbitrated by CYP2C8-mediated slowdown of paclitaxel metabolism in the liver. The fact of intense CYP2C8 inhibitory action of glabridin was also ascertained using human liver microsomes. Concisely, glabridin plays a dual role in boosting anti-metastatic activity by augmenting paclitaxel exposure via CYP2C8 inhibition-mediated delaying paclitaxel metabolism and limiting tumorigenesis via CYP2J2 inhibition-mediated restricting EETs level. Considering the safety, reported protective efficacy, and the current study results of boosted anti-metastatic effects, further investigations are warranted as a promising neoadjuvant therapy for crux paclitaxel chemoresistance and cancer recurrence.

Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Non-Structural Proteins

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an enveloped respiratory β coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19), leading to a deadly pandemic that has claimed millions of lives worldwide. Like other coronaviruses, the SARS-CoV-2 genome also codes for non-structural proteins (NSPs). These NSPs are found within open reading frame 1a (ORF1a) and open reading frame 1ab (ORF1ab) of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and encode NSP1 to NSP11 and NSP12 to NSP16, respectively. This study aimed to collect the available literature regarding NSP inhibitors. In addition, we searched the natural product database looking for similar structures. The results showed that similar structures could be tested as potential inhibitors of the NSPs.

Interactions of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Agents Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir/Paxlovid with Human Drug Transporters

Orally administered small molecules may have important therapeutic potential in treating COVID-19 disease. The recently developed antiviral agents, Molnupiravir and Nirmatrelvir, have been reported to be efficient treatments, with only moderate side effects, especially when applied in the early phases of this disease. However, drug-drug and drug-transporter interactions have already been noted by the drug development companies and in the application notes. In the present work, we have studied some of the key human transporters interacting with these agents. The nucleoside analog Molnupiravir (EIDD-2801) and its main metabolite (EIDD-1931) were found to inhibit CNT1,2 in addition to the ENT1,2 nucleoside transporters; however, it did not significantly influence the relevant OATP transporters or the ABCC4 nucleoside efflux transporter. The active component of Paxlovid (PF-07321332, Nirmatrelvir) inhibited the function of several OATPs and of ABCB1 but did not affect ABCG2. However, significant inhibition was observed only at high concentrations of Nirmatrelvir and probably did not occur in vivo. Paxlovid, as used in the clinic, is a combination of Nirmatrelvir (viral protease inhibitor) and Ritonavir (a "booster" inhibitor of Nirmatrelvir metabolism). Ritonavir is known to inhibit several drug transporters; therefore, we have examined these compounds together, in relevant concentrations and ratios. No additional inhibitory effect of Nirmatrelvir was observed compared to the strong transporter inhibition caused by Ritonavir. Our current in vitro results should help to estimate the potential drug-drug interactions of these newly developed agents during COVID-19 treatment.

The inhibitory and inducing effects of ritonavir on hepatic and intestinal CYP3A and other drug-handling proteins

Ritonavir, originally developed as HIV protease inhibitor, is widely used as a booster in several HIV pharmacotherapy regimens and more recently in Covid-19 treatment (e.g., Paxlovid). Its boosting capacity is due to the highly potent irreversible inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A enzyme, thereby enhancing the plasma exposure to coadministered drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Typically used booster doses of ritonavir are 100-200 mg once or twice daily. This review aims to address several aspects of this booster drug, including the possibility to use lower ritonavir doses, 20 mg for instance, resulting in partial CYP3A inactivation in patients. If complete CYP3A inhibition is not needed, lower ritonavir doses could be used, thereby reducing unwanted side effects. In this context, there are contradictory reports on the actual recovery time of CYP3A activity after ritonavir discontinuation, but probably this will take at least one day. In addition to ritonavir's CYP3A inhibitory effect, it can also induce and/or inhibit other CYP enzymes and drug transporters, albeit to a lesser extent. Although ritonavir thus exhibits gene induction capacities, with respect to CYP3A activity the inhibition capacity clearly predominates. Another potent CYP3A inhibitor, the ritonavir analog cobicistat, has been reported to lack the ability to induce enzyme and transporter genes. This might result in a more favorable drug-drug interaction profile compared to ritonavir, although the actual benefit appears to be limited. Indeed, ritonavir is still the clinically most used pharmacokinetic enhancer, indicating that its side effects are well manageable, even in chronic administration regimens.

Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Kinase Inhibitors

(1) Introduction: Pharmacokinetic boosting of kinase inhibitors can be a strategy to enhance drug exposure and to reduce dose and associated treatment costs. Most kinase inhibitors are predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4, enabling boosting using CYP3A4 inhibition. Kinase inhibitors with food enhanced absorption can be boosted using food optimized intake schedules. The aim of this narrative review is to provide answers to the following questions: Which different boosting strategies can be useful in boosting kinase inhibitors? Which kinase inhibitors are potential candidates for either CYP3A4 or food boosting? Which clinical studies on CYP3A4 or food boosting have been published or are ongoing? (2) Methods: PubMed was searched for boosting studies of kinase inhibitors. (3) Results/Discussion: This review describes 13 studies on exposure boosting of kinase inhibitors. Boosting strategies included cobicistat, ritonavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, posaconazole, grapefruit juice and food. Clinical trial design for conducting pharmacokinetic boosting trials and risk management is discussed. (4) Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic boosting of kinase inhibitors is a promising, rapidly evolving and already partly proven strategy to increase drug exposure and to potentially reduce treatment costs. Therapeutic drug monitoring can be of added value in guiding boosted regimens.

Metabolomics-based discovery of XHP as a CYP3A4 inhibitor against pancreatic cancer

Background: Xihuang Wan (XHW), a purgative and detoxifying agent, is commonly utilized in modern medicine as a treatment and adjuvant therapy for various malignancies, including breast cancer, liver cancer, and lung cancer. A clinical study demonstrated the potential usefulness of the combination of XHW and gemcitabine as a therapy for pancreatic cancer (PC), indicating that XHW’s broad-spectrum antitumor herbal combination could be beneficial in the treatment of PC. However, the precise therapeutic efficacy of XHW in treating pancreatic cancer remains uncertain.

Aim: This study assessed the biological activity of XHW by optimizing the therapeutic concentration of XHW (Xihuang pills, XHP). We performed cell culture and developed an animal test model to determine whether XHP can inhibit pancreatic cancer (PC). We also applied the well-known widely targeted metabolomics analysis and conducted specific experiments to assess the feasibility of our method in PC therapy.

Materials and Methods: We used UPLC/Q-TOF-MS to test XHP values to set up therapeutic concentrations for the in vivo test model. SW1990 pancreatic cancer cells were cultured to check the effect the anti-cancer effects of XHP by general in vitro cell analyses including CCK-8, Hoechst 33258, and flow cytometry. To develop the animal model, a solid tumor was subcutaneously formed on a mouse model of PC and assessed by immunohistochemistry and TUNEL apoptosis assay. We also applied the widely targeted metabolomics method following Western blot and RT-PCR to evaluate multiple metabolites to check the therapeutic effect of XHP in our cancer test model.

Results: Quantified analysis from UPLC/Q-TOF-MS showed the presence of the following components of XHP: 11-carbonyl-β-acetyl-boswellic acid (AKBA), 11-carbonyl-β-boswellic acid (KBA), 4-methylene-2,8,8-trimethyl-2-vinyl-bicyclo [5.2.0]nonane, and (1S-endo)-2-methyl-3-methylene-2-(4-methyl-3-3-pentenyl)-bicyclo [2.2.1heptane]. The results of the cell culture experiments demonstrated that XHP suppressed the growth of SW1990 PC cells by enhancing apoptosis. The results of the animal model tests also indicated the suppression effect of XHP on tumor growth. Furthermore, the result of the widely targeted metabolomics analysis showed that the steroid hormone biosynthesis metabolic pathway was a critical factor in the anti-PC effect of XHP in the animal model. Moreover, Western blot and RT-PCR analyses revealed XHP downregulated CYP3A4 expression as an applicable targeted therapeutic approach.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated the potential of XHP in therapeutic applications in PC. Moreover, the widely targeted metabolomics method revealed CYP3A4 is a potential therapeutic target of XHP in PC control. These findings provide a high level of confidence that XHP significantly acts as a CYP3A4 inhibitor in anti-cancer therapeutic applications.

Real-world effectiveness of Azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study

Chinese guidelines prioritize the use of Azvudine and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in COVID-19 patients. Nevertheless, the real-world effectiveness of Azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is still lacking, despite clinical trials showing their effectiveness compared with matched controls. To compare the effectiveness of Azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatments in real-world clinical practice, we identified 2118 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with a follow-up of up to 38 days. After exclusions and propensity score matching, we included 281 Azvudine recipients and 281 nirmatrelvir-ritonavir recipients who did not receive oxygen therapy at admission. The lower crude incidence rate of composite disease progression outcome (7.83 vs. 14.83 per 1000 person-days, p = 0.026) and all-cause death (2.05 vs. 5.78 per 1000 person-days, p = 0.052) were observed among Azvudine recipients. Azvudine was associated with lower risks of composite disease progression outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.94) and all-cause death (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.16-1.04). In subgroup analyses, the results of composite outcome retained significance among patients aged <65 years, those having a history of disease, those with severe COVID-19 at admission, and those receiving antibiotics. These findings suggest that Azvudine treatment showed effectiveness in hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in terms of composite disease progression outcome.

Drug-drug interactions involving CFTR modulators: a review of the evidence and clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by mucus accumulation impairing the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (ivacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, and lumacaftor) significantly improve lung function and nutritional status; however, they are substrates, inhibitors, and/or inducers of certain CYP enzymes and transporters, raising the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) with common CF medications.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted for DDIs involving CFTR modulators by reviewing new drug applications, drug package inserts, clinical studies, and validated databases of substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. Clinically, CYP3A inducers and inhibitors significantly decrease and increase systemic concentrations of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, respectively. Additionally, lumacaftor and ivacaftor alter concentrations of CYP3A and P-gp substrates. Potential DDIs without current clinical evidence include ivacaftor and elexacaftor's effect on CYP2C9 and OATP1B1/3 substrates, respectively, and OATP1B1/3 and P-gp inhibitors' effect on tezacaftor. A literature review was conducted using PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosing recommendations for CFTR modulators with DDIs are relatively comprehensive; however, recommendations on timing of dosing transition of CFTR modulators when CYP3A inhibitors are initiated or discontinued is incomplete. Certain drug interactions may be managed by choosing an alternative treatment to avoid/minimize DDIs. Next generation CFTR modulator therapies under development are expected to provide increased activity with reduced DDI risk.

Paxlovid (Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir): A new approach to Covid-19 therapy?

Despite the need for novel, effective therapeutics for the COVID-19 pandemic, no curative regimen is yet available, therefore patients are forced to rely on supportive and nonspecific therapies. Some SARS-CoV-2 proteins, like the 3C-like protease (3CLpro) or the major protease (Mpro), have been identified as promising targets for antiviral drugs. The Mpro has major a role in protein processing as well as pathogenesis of the virus, and could be a useful therapeutic target. The antiviral drug nirmatrelvir can keep SARS-CoV-2 from replicating through inhibiting Mpro. Nirmatrelvir was combined with another HIV protease inhibitor, ritonavir, to create Paxlovid (Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir). The metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 3 A is inhibited by ritonavir to lengthen the half-life of nirmatrelvir, so rintonavir acts as a pharmacological enhancer. Nirmatrelvir exhibits potent antiviral activity against current coronavirus variants, despite significant alterations in the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome. Nevertheless, there are still several unanswered questions. This review summarizes the current literature on nirmatrelvir and ritonavir efficacy in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection, and also their safety and possible side effects.