Temporal Trends of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation over 12 Years: A High-Volume Single-Center Experience

Temporal Trends in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Nationwide Study

With increased use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in treatment of aortic stenosis, it is important to evaluate real life data trends in outcomes. This nationwide register-based study aimed to present an outlook on temporal trends in characteristics and outcomes, including mortality. First-time consecutive Danish patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2019 were included in this study. The chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess the differences in the characteristics over time and Cochrane-Armitage trend tests were used to examine changes in complications and mortality. Between 2010 and 2019, 4,847 patients (54.6% men, median age 82 [quartile 1 to quartile 3: 77 to 85] years) underwent first-time TAVI. A statistically significant decrease over time was observed for preprocedural hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure, whereas preexisting chronic obstructive lung disease and preprocedural pacemaker remained stable. We observed a significant decrease in 30- and 90-day postoperative preprocedural pacemaker implantation from 2011 to 2017, with 15.1% and 15.9% in 2011 and 8.6% and 8.9% in 2017, respectively. The incidence of for 30- and 90-day heart failure significantly decreased from 19.3% and 20.3% to 8.5% and 9.1%, respectively. We observed significant changes for 30-day atrial fibrillation, whereas the changes over time for 90-day atrial fibrillation and 30- and 90-day stroke/transient ischemic attack remained insignificant. The all-cause mortality within 30- and 90 days significantly decreased over time from 6.7% and 9.2% in 2011 to 1.5% and 2.7% in 2019 and 2016, respectively. In conclusion, this national study provides general insight on the trends of complications and mortality of TAVI, demonstrating significant reductions over time.

Vascular Complications in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Plug-Based vs Suture-Based Closure Devices

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data regarding the efficacy and safety of suture vs plug-based vascular closure devices (VCDs) for large-bore catheter management in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We compared the rates of vascular complications (VCs) associated with 2 commonly used VCDs in a large cohort of patients undergoing TAVR.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre, all-comer, prospective registry study, enrolling patients undergoing TAVR for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) between the years 2009 and 2022. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing closure of the femoral access point using the MANTA VCD (M-VCD) (Teleflex, Wayne, PA) vs the ProGlide VCD (P-VCD) (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL). The main outcome measures were researcher adjudicated events of VARC-2 defined major and minor VCs.

RESULTS

Overall, 2368 patients were enrolled in the registry; 1315 (51.0% male, 81.0 ± 7.0 years) patients were included in the current analysis. P-VCD was used in 813 patients, whereas M-VCD was used in 502 patients. In-hospital VCs were more frequent in the M-VCD vs the P-VCD group (17.3% vs 9.8%; P < 0.001). This outcome was mainly driven by elevated rates of minor VCs in the M-VCD group, whereas no significant difference was observed for major VCs (15.1% vs 8.4%; P < 0.001 and 2.2% vs 1.5%; P = 0.33, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS, M-VCD was associated with higher rates of VCs. This outcome was mainly driven by minor VCs. The rate of major VCs was low in both groups.