1
|
Ghazi FG, Schenker ML, Smith RN, Spencer CC, Mlaver E. Patient-reported barriers for adherence to prophylactic enoxaparin after orthopedic trauma surgery. Injury 2024; 55:111650. [PMID: 38878384 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Venous thromboembolism following orthopedic trauma surgery remains prevalent despite prophylaxis being a standard of care. Enoxaparin injection is a commonly utilized prophylaxis regimen among high-risk patients. Patient-reported rates of nonadherence and barriers to enoxaparin use are not described in the literature. A better understanding of these barriers and their impact on adherence to post-discharge prophylaxis regimens may shed light on persistent outcomes gaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews were administered to adult patients prescribed prophylactic enoxaparin and presenting to orthopedic surgery outpatient clinic at an urban level 1 trauma center for a post-operative appointment following traumatic injury from April to July 2023. Patients self-reported their age, gender, race, and mobility. Inductive thematic analysis with three-reviewer consensus identified common barriers among responses. Adherence rates were calculated by dividing patients' estimated number of missed doses over total prescribed doses at the point of inquiry. RESULTS We identified 154 eligible patients through chart review, and 50 enrolled and interviewed. Participants had a mean age of 37 years. Of 50 participants, 20 identified as female; 25 identified as Black or African American, 16 as White, 5 as Hispanic, 2 as Asian, and 2 as multiracial. Twenty-one participants were non-ambulatory at time of interview. Mean and median patient-reported adherence were 64.5 % (SD 35.5) and 70.5 % (IQR 33-100) respectively. Five patients reported complete nonadherence, while 17 patients reported perfect adherence. Every participant reporting complete nonadherence identified as Black or African American, as compared to 8 out of 17 reporting perfect adherence. Despite acknowledging a twice-daily prescription, 17 patients reported once-daily rather than twice-daily use. Inductive thematic analysis revealed the following six barriers to prophylaxis adherence (number of participants reporting): Inconvenience (18 patients), Pain (16), Fear (12), Acquisition (7), Bruising (7), and Mechanism (7). Altogether, 40 patients endorsed at least one barrier to adherence. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS Most patients face barriers to adherence with post-discharge prophylactic enoxaparin, and the resultant rates of adherence are low. This may contribute to persistent outcomes gaps in the orthopedic trauma population despite prophylaxis standards. Changes in prescribing patterns and patient engagement techniques may improve post-operative thromboembolic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mara L Schenker
- Emory University, School of Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery, USA; Grady Memorial Hospital, USA
| | - Randi N Smith
- Emory University, School of Medicine Department of Surgery, USA; Grady Memorial Hospital, USA
| | - Corey C Spencer
- Emory University, School of Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery, USA
| | - Eli Mlaver
- Emory University, School of Medicine Department of Surgery, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shevell L, Ochs M, Schaefer J. Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer: When and How? Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:201-209. [PMID: 36705880 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01358-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cancer-associated thrombosis is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer. Historically, thromboprophylaxis efforts have focused on the highest risk patients with cancer, including post-operative patients and hospitalized patients. This review covers not only thromboprophylaxis for these groups but also emerging data supporting prophylaxis in ambulatory medical oncology patients. RECENT FINDINGS Several leading guidelines, backed by clinical trial data, now support the use of direct oral anticoagulants for select high-risk outpatients for primary thromboprophylaxis. However, uptake of these findings remains low. Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis strategies continue to improve. However, it remains challenging to balance competing risks of bleeding and thrombosis. The morbidity and mortality associated with cancer associated thrombosis may be preventable. Understanding advancements in risk prediction, anticoagulant options, and implementation of existing data, is critical to provide optimal patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Shevell
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Madeleine Ochs
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Jordan Schaefer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rizk JG, Gupta A, Lazo JG, Sardar P, Henry BM, Lavie CJ, Effron MB. To Anticoagulate or Not to Anticoagulate in COVID-19: Lessons after 2 Years. Semin Thromb Hemost 2023; 49:62-72. [PMID: 35468641 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
A hypercoagulable state associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been well documented and is believed to be strongly supported by a proinflammatory state. The hypercoagulable state in turn results in increased incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism (VTE) seen in hospitalized COVID-19 when compared with hospitalized non-COVID-19 patient cohorts. Moreover, patients with arterial or VTE and COVID-19 have higher mortality compared with COVID-19 patients without arterial or VTE. Prevention of arterial or VTE thus remains an essential question in the management of COVID-19 patients, especially because of high rates of reported microvascular and macrovascular thrombosis. This has prompted multiple randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating different anticoagulation strategies in COVID-19 patients at various stages of the disease. Herein, we review findings from RCTs in the past 2 years of antithrombotic therapy in critically ill hospitalized patients, noncritically ill hospitalized patients, patients postdischarge from the hospital, and outpatients. RCTs in critically ill patients demonstrated therapeutic dose anticoagulation does not improve outcomes and has more bleeding than prophylaxis dose anticoagulant in these patients. Trials in noncritically ill hospitalized patients showed a therapeutic dose anticoagulation with a heparin formulation might improve clinical outcomes. Anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant posthospital discharge may improve outcomes, although there is a large RCT in progress. Nonhospitalized COVID-19 patients have an insufficient burden of events to be candidates for antithrombotic therapy. Anticoagulation in pregnant and lactating patients with COVID-19, as well as antiplatelet therapy for COVID-19, is also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G Rizk
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Aashish Gupta
- John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Jose G Lazo
- UCSF Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Partha Sardar
- John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Brandon Michael Henry
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.,Disease Prevention and Intervention & Population Health Programs, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Carl J Lavie
- John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Mark B Effron
- John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pop C, Hermenean A, Moș L, Cotoraci C. Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolic Events in COVID-19 Patients after Hospital Discharge: Aspects to Consider. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2022; 23:219. [PMID: 39077187 PMCID: PMC11274040 DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2306219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Venous thromboembolic (VTE) events have been increasingly reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after hospital discharge. Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the most frequent type of post-discharge VTE complication. Levels of procoagulants (fibrinogen, factor VIII, von Willebrand factor), and D-dimer are higher during the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with more severe inflammatory and procoagulant response experience higher VTE rates during hospitalization, while the risk after hospital discharge have not been well characterized. The incidence of VTE events following hospitalization is heterogeneous, ranging from low (3.1 per 1000 discharges), to 1.8%, which appears higher than for other medical condition. This discrepancy was partially explained by the differences in VTE screening and follow-up strategies, and by the period when the information about the VTE was collected. These data were based mainly on observational and retrospective studies; however, evolving data are to come after the completion of the prospective trials. The current guidelines do not recommend routine post-hospital VTE prophylaxis for COVID-19 patients but recommend it for all hospitalized adults. A careful risk-benefit assessment of VTE probability should be performed, to determine whether an individual patient may merit post-discharge thromboprophylaxis. A score such IMPROVE DD can help identify the patient who will potentially benefit but is also important to consider the bleeding risk and the feasibility. The optimal duration and the type of extended thromboprophylaxis is still under debate (from a minimum of 14 days to a maximum of 42 days), and future studies will help to validate these protocols in different populations. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), warfarin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are recommended, but low doses of DOACs rather than LMVH or warfarin were predominantly used in most patients. Finally, the COVID-19 patients should be educated to recognize and advised to seek urgent medical care should VTE events occur after hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Călin Pop
- Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Arad, “Vasile Goldis” West University, 310048 Arad CP, Romania
| | - Anca Hermenean
- Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Arad, “Vasile Goldis” West University, 310048 Arad CP, Romania
| | - Liana Moș
- Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Arad, “Vasile Goldis” West University, 310048 Arad CP, Romania
| | - Coralia Cotoraci
- Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Arad, “Vasile Goldis” West University, 310048 Arad CP, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Forgo G, Micieli E, Ageno W, Castellucci LA, Cesarman‐Maus G, Ddungu H, De Paula EV, Dumantepe M, Guillermo Esposito MC, Konstantinides SV, Kucher N, McLintock C, Ní Áinle F, Spyropoulos AC, Urano T, Hunt BJ, Barco S. An update on the global use of risk assessment models and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with medical illnesses from the World Thrombosis Day steering committee: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2022; 20:409-421. [PMID: 34822215 PMCID: PMC9299991 DOI: 10.1111/jth.15607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The majority of VTE events are hospital-associated. In 2008, the Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting (ENDORSE) multinational cross-sectional study reported that only approximately 40% of medical patients at risk of VTE received adequate thromboprophylaxis. METHODS In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at providing updated figures concerning the use of thromboprophylaxis globally. We focused on: (a) the frequency of patients with an indication to thromboprophylaxis according with individual models; (b) the use of adequate thromboprophylaxis; and (c) reported contraindications to thromboprophylaxis. Observational nonrandomized studies or surveys focusing on medically ill patients were considered eligible. RESULTS After screening, we included 27 studies from 20 countries for a total of 137 288 patients. Overall, 50.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.9-59.1, I2 99%) of patients had an indication to thromboprophylaxis: of these, 54.5% (95% CI: 46.2-62.6, I2 99%) received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The use of adequate thromboprophylaxis was 66.8% in Europe (95% CI: 50.7-81.1, I2 98%), 44.9% in Africa (95% CI: 31.8-58.4, I2 96%), 37.6% in Asia (95% CI: 25.7-50.3, I2 97%), 58.3% in South America (95% CI: 31.1-83.1, I2 99%), and 68.6% in North America (95% CI: 64.9-72.6, I2 96%). No major differences in adequate thromboprophylaxis use were found across risk assessment models. Bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and renal/hepatic failure were the most frequently reported contraindications to thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS The use of anticoagulants for VTE prevention has been proven effective and safe, but thromboprophylaxis prescriptions are still unsatisfactory among hospitalized medically ill patients around the globe with marked geographical differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabor Forgo
- Department of AngiologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Evy Micieli
- Department of AngiologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of InsubriaVareseItaly
| | - Lana A. Castellucci
- Department of MedicineOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaOttawaONCanada
| | | | | | | | - Mert Dumantepe
- Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryUskudar University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
| | | | | | - Nils Kucher
- Department of AngiologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Claire McLintock
- National Women's Health Auckland City Hospital Auckland New ZealandAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Fionnuala Ní Áinle
- Department of HaematologyMater Misericordiae University Hospital and Rotunda HospitalDublinIreland
- School of MedicineUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Alex C. Spyropoulos
- Institute for Health Innovations and Outcomes ResearchFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research and the Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/NorthwellNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of Medicine, Anticoagulation and Clinical Thrombosis ServicesNorthwell Health at Lenox Hill HospitalNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Tetsumei Urano
- Shizuoka Graduate University of Public HealthShizuokaJapan
| | - Beverley J. Hunt
- Thrombosis & Haemophilia CentreGuys & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Stefano Barco
- Department of AngiologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Center for Thrombosis and HemostasisUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Daru J, White K, Hunt BJ. COVID-19, thrombosis and pregnancy. THROMBOSIS UPDATE 2021; 5:100077. [PMID: 38620710 PMCID: PMC8490126 DOI: 10.1016/j.tru.2021.100077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased thromboembolic events have been seen in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia, especially those with acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring intensive care support. The coronavirus pandemic has had varied effects on pregnant women globally. Concerns about the potential for thromboembolic events in the prothrombotic period of pregnancy and puerperium when combined with COVID-19 infection, and the impact this may have on maternal and infant morbidity and mortality has led to the development of expert-led guidance providing increased use of thromboprophylaxis in this group. We discuss the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on national and international guidance to prevent thromboembolic events in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jahnavi Daru
- Institute for Population Health Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Katie White
- Thrombosis & Haemophilia Centre, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Beverley J Hunt
- Thrombosis & Haemophilia Centre, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaptein F, Stals M, Huisman M, Klok F. Prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 related venous thromboembolism. Postgrad Med 2021; 133:27-35. [PMID: 33657964 PMCID: PMC7938649 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2021.1891788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 pneumonia has been associated with high rates of thrombo-embolic complications, mostly venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is thought to be a combination of conventional VTE and in situ immunothrombosis in the pulmonary vascular tree. The incidence of thrombotic complications is dependent on setting (intensive care unit (ICU) versus general ward) and the threshold for performing diagnostic tests (screening versus diagnostic algorithms triggered by symptoms). Since these thrombotic complications are associated with in-hospital mortality, all current guidelines and consensus papers propose pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in all hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Several trials are ongoing to study the optimal intensity of anticoagulation for this purpose. As for the management of thrombotic complications, treatment regimens from non-COVID-19 guidelines can be adapted, with choice of anticoagulant drug class dependent on the situation. Parenteral anticoagulation is preferred for patients on ICUs or with impending clinical deterioration, while oral treatment can be started in stable patients. This review describes current knowledge on incidence and pathophysiology of COVID-19 associated VTE and provides an overview of guideline recommendations on thromboprophylaxis and treatment of established VTE in COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F.H.J. Kaptein
- Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M.A.M. Stals
- Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M.V. Huisman
- Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F.A. Klok
- Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kantor B, Poénou G, Plaisance L, Toledano E, Mekhloufi Y, Helfer H, Djennaoui S, Mahé I. [Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Hospitalized Medical Patients]. Rev Med Interne 2021; 43:9-17. [PMID: 33895004 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.03.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) occur in approximately 50% of cases during or following hospitalization; VTE are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Thromboprophylaxis for 6 to 14 days with heparins or fondaparinux has been demonstrated to be effective in VTE prevention in patients hospitalized for acute medical illnesses and reduced mobility. Nevertheless, the level of recommendation has been gradually downgraded as the benefit has been mainly demonstrated on the basis of systematic imaging diagnosed events. Direct oral anticoagulants have been assessed only as an extended prophylaxis, and are currently not recommended in medical thromboprophylaxis. Assessing the risk of VTE and bleeding in medical patients is complex. VTE and bleeding risk assessment scores were constructed but have not been validated. In order to improve the adequacy of prescriptions for thromboprophylaxis, the impact of different interventions has been the subject of several studies but these yielded varying results. The aim of this review is to analyze the indications for thromboprophylaxis in a medical setting with the latest available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Kantor
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - G Poénou
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - L Plaisance
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - E Toledano
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Y Mekhloufi
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - H Helfer
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - S Djennaoui
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France
| | - I Mahé
- Inserm UMR_S1140, Innovative Therapies in Haemostasis, université de Paris, hôpital Louis-Mourier, AP-HP, Colombes, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ortega‐Paz L, Capodanno D, Montalescot G, Angiolillo DJ. Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Thrombosis and Coagulopathy: Review of the Pathophysiological Characteristics and Implications for Antithrombotic Management. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e019650. [PMID: 33228447 PMCID: PMC7955431 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.019650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, which has posed a significant threat to global health. Although the infection is frequently asymptomatic or associated with mild symptoms, in a small proportion of patients it can produce an intense inflammatory and prothrombotic state that can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiple organ failure, and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, highly expressed in the respiratory system, has been identified as a functional receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Notably, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is also expressed in the cardiovascular system, and there are multiple cardiovascular implications of COVID-19. Cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease have been associated with severe manifestations and poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. More important, patients with COVID-19 may have thrombotic and coagulation abnormalities, promoting a hypercoagulable state and resulting in an increased rate of thrombotic and thromboembolic events. This review will describe the pathophysiological characteristics of the cardiovascular involvement following infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, with a focus on thrombotic and thromboembolic manifestations and implications for antithrombotic management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Ortega‐Paz
- Cardiovascular InstituteInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinico‐Vittorio Emanuele"University of CataniaCataniaItaly
| | - Gilles Montalescot
- ACTION Study GroupInstitut de CardiologieAssistance Publique ‐ Hôpitaux de ParisHôpital Pitié‐SalpêtrièreUniversity Paris 6INSERM UMRS 1166ParisFrance
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rivaroxaban: Expanded Role in Cardiovascular Disease Management-A Literature Review. Cardiovasc Ther 2021; 2021:8886210. [PMID: 33505518 PMCID: PMC7810545 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8886210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and as prophylaxis after hip and knee surgery after approval by the Food and Drug Administration. In the last decade, DOACs were studied for various indications; this review is focused on rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, which is used in an expanded evidence-based fashion for coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, malignancy, and prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in acute medical illnesses.
Collapse
|
11
|
Spyropoulos AC, Levy JH, Ageno W, Connors JM, Hunt BJ, Iba T, Levi M, Samama CM, Thachil J, Giannis D, Douketis JD. Scientific and Standardization Committee communication: Clinical guidance on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18:1859-1865. [PMID: 32459046 PMCID: PMC7283841 DOI: 10.1111/jth.14929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 533] [Impact Index Per Article: 133.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alex C Spyropoulos
- Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research and The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and Department of Medicine, Anticoagulation and Clinical Thrombosis Services, Northwell Health at Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jerrold H Levy
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Walter Ageno
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Jean Marie Connors
- Hematology Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverley J Hunt
- Thrombosis and Haemophilia Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Toshiaki Iba
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marcel Levi
- Department of Medicine and Cardiometabolic Programme-NIHR UCLH/UCL BRC, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles Marc Samama
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine GHU AP-HP. Centre-Université de Paris-Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jecko Thachil
- Department of Haematology, Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | | | - James D Douketis
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nicholson M, Chan N, Bhagirath V, Ginsberg J. Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in 2020 and Beyond. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082467. [PMID: 32752154 PMCID: PMC7465935 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third most common cause of vascular mortality worldwide and comprises deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). In this review, we discuss how an understanding of VTE epidemiology and the results of thromboprophylaxis trials have shaped the current approach to VTE prevention. We will discuss modern thromboprophylaxis as it pertains to genetic risk factors, exogenous hormonal therapies, pregnancy, surgery, medical hospitalization, cancer, and what is known thus far about VTE in COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
|