1
|
Hirsch S, Liu E, Rosen R. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of COVID-19 Infection in Children. J Pediatr 2024; 274:114179. [PMID: 38944187 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in children. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective, case-control study included all children ≤21 years undergoing COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing at a tertiary children's hospital between March 2020 and January 2023. The main exposure was PPI usage. The primary outcome was COVID-19 infection. The secondary outcome was COVID-19 hospitalization. Log-binomial regressions were used to examine associations between PPI use and these outcomes. RESULTS 116 209 patients age 8.5 ± 6.2 years underwent 234 867 COVID-19 tests. Current PPI use was associated with a decreased risk of COVID-19 test positivity compared with PPI nonuse [RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76, 0.94), P = .002]; however, there was a significant interaction with time of testing, and an effect of PPIs was no longer seen in the final months of the study following lessening of COVID-19 precautions [RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.0.80, 1.36), P = .77]. PPI use was not associated with risk of hospitalization in patients positive for COVID-19 after adjusting for other hospitalization risk factors [RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.64, 1.13), P = .26]. CONCLUSIONS We did not find an association between PPI use and increased COVID-19 susceptibility or severity in this pediatric sample. These results provide reassuring evidence that PPIs may not worsen COVID-19 outcomes in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanna Hirsch
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Aerodigestive Center, Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Enju Liu
- Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel Rosen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Aerodigestive Center, Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pontiroli AE, Scovenna F, Carlini V, Tagliabue E, Martin-Delgado J, Sala LL, Tanzi E, Zanoni I. Vaccination against influenza viruses reduces infection, not hospitalization or death, from respiratory COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2024; 96:e29343. [PMID: 38163281 PMCID: PMC10924223 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes COVID-19 and has brought a huge burden in terms of human lives. Strict social distance and influenza vaccination have been recommended to avoid co-infections between influenza viruses and SARS-CoV-2. Scattered reports suggested a protective effect of influenza vaccine on COVID-19 development and severity. We analyzed 51 studies on the capacity of influenza vaccination to affect infection with SARS-CoV-2, hospitalization, admission to Intensive Care Units (ICU), and mortality. All subjects taken into consideration did not receive any anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, although their status with respect to previous infections with SARS-CoV-2 is not known. Comparison between vaccinated and not-vaccinated subjects for each of the four endpoints was expressed as odds ratio (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); all analyses were performed by DerSimonian and Laird model, and Hartung-Knapp model when studies were less than 10. In a total of 61 029 936 subjects from 33 studies, influenza vaccination reduced frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection [OR plus 95% CI = 0.70 (0.65-0.77)]. The effect was significant in all studies together, in health care workers and in the general population; distance from influenza vaccination and the type of vaccine were also of importance. In 98 174 subjects from 11 studies, frequency of ICU admission was reduced with influenza vaccination [OR (95% CI) = 0.71 (0.54-0.94)]; the effect was significant in all studies together, in pregnant women and in hospitalized subjects. In contrast, in 4 737 328 subjects from 14 studies hospitalization was not modified [OR (95% CI) = 1.05 (0.82-1.35)], and in 4 139 660 subjects from 19 studies, mortality was not modified [OR (95% CI) = 0.76 (0.26-2.20)]. Our study emphasizes the importance of influenza vaccination in the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio E. Pontiroli
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Scovenna
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Carlini
- IRCCS MultiMedica, Laboratory of Cardiovascular and Dysmetabolic Disease, 20138 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Tagliabue
- IRCCS MultiMedica, Value-Based Healthcare Unit, 20099 Milan, Italy
| | - Jimmy Martin-Delgado
- Hospital Luis Vernaza, Junta de Beneficiencia de Guayaquil 090603, Ecuador
- Instituto de Investigacion e Innovacion en Salud Integral, Universidad Catolica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil 090603, Ecuador
| | - Lucia La Sala
- IRCCS MultiMedica, Laboratory of Cardiovascular and Dysmetabolic Disease, 20138 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Tanzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Ivan Zanoni
- Harvard Medical School, Boston Children’s Hospital, Division of Immunology and Division of Gastroenterology, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dennis BB, Thabane L, Heels-Ansdell D, Dionne JC, Binnie A, Tsang J, Guyatt G, Ahmed A, Lauzier F, Deane A, Arabi Y, Marshall J, Zytaruk N, Saunders L, Finfer S, Myburgh J, Muscedere J, English S, Ostermann M, Hardie M, Knowles S, Cook D. Proton pump inhibitors in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: protocol for a substudy of the Re-EValuating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (REVISE) Trial. Trials 2023; 24:561. [PMID: 37644556 PMCID: PMC10466724 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07589-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critically ill patients commonly receive proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to prevent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding from stress-induced ulceration. Despite widespread use in the intensive care unit (ICU), observational data suggest that PPIs may be associated with adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection. This preplanned study is nested within a large randomized trial evaluating pantoprazole versus placebo in invasively ventilated patients. The 3 objectives are as follows: (1) to describe the characteristics of patients with COVID-19 in terms of demographics, biomarkers, venous thromboembolism, tracheostomy incidence and timing, and other clinical outcomes; (2) to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on clinically important GI bleeding, 90-day mortality, and other outcomes compared to a propensity-matched non-infected cohort; and (3) to explore whether pantoprazole has a differential treatment effect on clinically important GI bleeding, 90-day mortality, and other outcomes in patients with and without COVID-19 infection. METHODS The ongoing trial Re-EValuating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (REVISE) compares pantoprazole 40 mg IV to placebo on the primary efficacy outcome of clinically important GI bleeding and the primary safety outcome of 90-day mortality. The protocol described in this report is for a substudy focused on patients with COVID-19 infection that was not in the original pre-pandemic trial protocol. We developed a one-page case report form to characterize these patients including data related to biomarkers, venous thromboembolism, COVID-19 therapies, tracheostomy incidence and timing, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU and hospital stay. Our analysis will describe the trajectory of patients with COVID-19 infection, a propensity-matched analysis of infected and non-infected patients, and an extended subgroup analysis comparing the effect of PPI among patients with and without COVID-19 infection. DISCUSSION Prophylactic acid suppression in invasively ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection has unknown consequences. The results of these investigations will inform practice, guidelines, and future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION REVISE Trial [NCT03374800 December 15, 2017], COVID-19 Cohort Study [NCT05715567 February 8, 2023].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Diane Heels-Ansdell
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Joanna C. Dionne
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, McMaster University Health Sciences Center, Room 2C11, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5 Canada
| | - Alexandra Binnie
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Niagara Health System, St. Catharines, ON Canada
| | - Jennifer Tsang
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Niagara Health System, St. Catharines, ON Canada
| | - Gordon Guyatt
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, McMaster University Health Sciences Center, Room 2C11, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5 Canada
| | - Aijaz Ahmed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA
| | - François Lauzier
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec Canada
| | - Adam Deane
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - Yaseen Arabi
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of the National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - John Marshall
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Nicole Zytaruk
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Lois Saunders
- Division of Critical Care, Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Simon Finfer
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - John Myburgh
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - John Muscedere
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
| | - Shane English
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Critical Care, King’s College London, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Miranda Hardie
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Serena Knowles
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Deborah Cook
- Division of Critical Care, Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, McMaster University Health Sciences Center, Room 2C11, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5 Canada
| | - For the REVISE Investigators the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, McMaster University Health Sciences Center, Room 2C11, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5 Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Niagara Health System, St. Catharines, ON Canada
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Parkville, VIC Australia
- Intensive Care Department, Ministry of the National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Department of Critical Care, King’s College London, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim B, Jung JH, Han K, Kang S, Lee E, Chung H, Kim SG, Cho SJ. Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists and Proton Pump Inhibitors Are Associated With Reduced Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Without Comorbidities Including Diabetes, Hypertension, and Dyslipidemia: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Cohort Study. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e99. [PMID: 37012686 PMCID: PMC10070049 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify the effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on the positivity rate and clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS We performed a nationwide cohort study with propensity score matching using medical claims data and general health examination results from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Individuals aged ≥ 20 years who were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) between 1 January and 4 June 2020 were included. Patients who were prescribed H2RA or PPI within 1 year of the test date were defined as H2RA and PPI users, respectively. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 test positivity, and the secondary outcome was the instance of severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19, including death, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation administration. RESULTS Among 59,094 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2, 21,711 were H2RA users, 12,426 were PPI users, and 24,957 were non-users. After propensity score matching, risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly lower in H2RA users (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.98) and PPI users (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74) compared to non-users. In patients with comorbidities including diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, the effect of H2RA and PPI against SARS-CoV-2 infection was not significant, whereas the protective effect was maintained in patients without such comorbidities. Risk of severe clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients showed no difference between users and non-users after propensity score matching either in H2RA users (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.52-1.54) or PPI users (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.60-2.51). CONCLUSION H2RA and PPI use is associated with a decreased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection but does not affect clinical outcome. Comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia seem to offset the protective effect of H2RA and PPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bokyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Hyung Jung
- Department of Biostatistics, The Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyungdo Han
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seungkyung Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunwoo Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Gyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo-Jeong Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kapoula GV, Vennou KE, Bagos PG. Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination and the Risk of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:3086. [PMID: 36553093 PMCID: PMC9776999 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A number of studies have investigated the potential on-specific effects of some routinely administered vaccines (e.g., influenza, pneumococcal) on COVID-19 related outcomes, with contrasting results. In order to elucidate this discrepancy, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between seasonal influenza vaccination and pneumococcal vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 infection and its clinical outcomes. PubMed and medRxiv databases were searched up to April 2022. A random effects model was used in the meta-analysis to pool odds ratio (OR) and adjusted estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was quantitatively assessed using the Cochran's Q and the I2 index. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and assessment of publication bias were performed for all outcomes. In total, 38 observational studies were included in the meta-analysis and there was substantial heterogeneity. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination were associated with lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.86 and OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.57-0.88, respectively). Regarding influenza vaccination, it seems that the majority of studies did not properly adjust for all potential confounders, so when the analysis was limited to studies that adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities and socioeconomic indices, the association diminished. This is not the case regarding pneumococcal vaccination, for which even after adjustment for such factors the association persisted. Regarding harder endpoints such as ICU admission and death, current data do not support the association. Possible explanations are discussed, including trained immunity, inadequate matching for socioeconomic indices and possible coinfection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia V. Kapoula
- Department of Biochemistry, General Hospital of Lamia, 35131 Lamia, Greece
- Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, 35131 Lamia, Greece
| | - Konstantina E. Vennou
- Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, 35131 Lamia, Greece
| | - Pantelis G. Bagos
- Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, 35131 Lamia, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Su W, Miao H, Guo Z, Chen Q, Huang T, Ding R. Associations between the use of aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs and all-cause mortality among patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:989903. [PMID: 36278186 PMCID: PMC9581252 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Whether aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs can reduce mortality among patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remains controversial.Methods: We identified randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective studies on associations between aspirin or other antiplatelet drug use and all-cause mortality among patients with COVID-19 in the PubMed database between March 2019 and September 2021. Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were used to assess the risk of bias. The I2 statistic was used to assess inconsistency among trial results. The summary risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR) were obtained through the meta-analysis.Results: The 34 included studies comprised three randomized controlled trials, 27 retrospective studies, and 4 prospective cohort studies. The retrospective and prospective cohort studies showed low-to-moderate risks of bias per the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale score, while the randomized controlled trials showed low-to-high risks of bias per the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The randomized controlled trials showed no significant effect of aspirin use on all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 {risk ratio (RR), 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–1.03]}. In retrospective studies, aspirin reduced all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 by 20% [odds ratio (OR), 0.80 (95% CI 0.70–0.93)], while other antiplatelet drugs had no significant effects. In prospective cohort studies, aspirin decreased all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 by 15% [OR, 0.85 (95% CI 0.80–0.90)].Conclusion: The administration of aspirin may reduce all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanting Su
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - He Miao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Zhaotian Guo
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Qianhui Chen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Sciences (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Center for Intelligent Public Health, Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Tao Huang, ; Renyu Ding,
| | - Renyu Ding
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
- *Correspondence: Tao Huang, ; Renyu Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang B, Huang Q, Jia M, Xue X, Wang Q, Yang W, Feng L. Association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection and its outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2022; 135:2282-2293. [PMID: 36378238 PMCID: PMC9771237 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND World Health Organization recommends that influenza vaccines should benefit as much of the population as possible, especially where resources are limited. Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become one of the greatest threats to health systems worldwide. The present study aimed to extend the evidence of the association between influenza vaccination and COVID-19 to promote the former. METHODS In this systematic review, four electronic databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, were searched for related studies published up to May 2022. All odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 36 studies, encompassing 55,996,841 subjects, were included in this study. The meta-analysis for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection provided an OR of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.87). The statistically significant estimates for clinical outcomes were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72-0.96) for intensive care unit admission, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.84) for ventilator support, and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.93) for fatal infection, while no effect seen in hospitalization with an OR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.68-1.10). CONCLUSION Influenza vaccination helps limit SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes, but further studies are needed. REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42022333747.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binshan Jiang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Qiangru Huang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Mengmeng Jia
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xinai Xue
- Department of Medical Records, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Qing Wang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Weizhong Yang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Luzhao Feng
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fatima K, Almas T, Lakhani S, Jahangir A, Ahmed A, Siddiqui A, Rahim A, Qureshi SA, Arshad Z, Golani S, Musheer A. The Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022; 7:37. [PMID: 35324584 PMCID: PMC8950138 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7030037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 has proved to be a serious, and consequential disease that has affected millions of people globally. Previously, the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been observed with increasing the risk of pneumonia and COVID-19. This meta-analysis aims to address the relationship between the use of PPI and the severity of COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systemic literature search from PUBMED, Science Direct, and Cinahl from December 2019 to January 2022. Published and unpublished randomized control trials and cohort studies were included. Review Manager was used for all statistical analyses. In total, 14 studies were included in this systemic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest include: (1) susceptibility of COVID-19 infection and (2) severity of COVID-19 (defined as the composite of poor outcomes: ICU admission, need for oxygen therapy, need for a ventilator, or death), and (3) mortality due to COVID-19. PPI use was marginally associated with a nominal but statistically significant increase in the risk of COVID-19 infection (OR 1.05 [1.01, 1.09]; I2 97%, p = 0.007). PPI use also increased the risk of the composite poor outcome (OR 1.84 [1.71, 1.99]; I2 98%, p < 0.00001) and mortality (OR 1.12 [1.00, 1.25]; I2 84%, p = 0.05) in patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaneez Fatima
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 75510, Pakistan; (K.F.); (A.R.); (Z.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Talal Almas
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15503 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shan Lakhani
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan; (S.L.); (A.J.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (S.A.Q.); (S.G.)
| | - Arshia Jahangir
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan; (S.L.); (A.J.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (S.A.Q.); (S.G.)
| | - Abdullah Ahmed
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan; (S.L.); (A.J.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (S.A.Q.); (S.G.)
| | - Ayra Siddiqui
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan; (S.L.); (A.J.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (S.A.Q.); (S.G.)
| | - Aiman Rahim
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 75510, Pakistan; (K.F.); (A.R.); (Z.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Saleha Ahmed Qureshi
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan; (S.L.); (A.J.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (S.A.Q.); (S.G.)
| | - Zukhruf Arshad
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 75510, Pakistan; (K.F.); (A.R.); (Z.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Shilpa Golani
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan; (S.L.); (A.J.); (A.A.); (A.S.); (S.A.Q.); (S.G.)
| | - Adeena Musheer
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 75510, Pakistan; (K.F.); (A.R.); (Z.A.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Israelsen SB, Ernst MT, Lundh A, Lundbo LF, Sandholdt H, Hallas J, Benfield T. Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Is Not Strongly Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Related Outcomes: A Nationwide Study and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1845-1854.e6. [PMID: 33989790 PMCID: PMC8111907 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and severe outcomes. However, meta-analyses show unclear results, leading to uncertainty regarding the safety of PPI use during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS We conducted a nationwide observational study including all SARS-CoV-2 cases (n = 83,224) in Denmark as of December 1, 2020. The association of current PPI use with risk of infection was examined in a case-control design. We investigated the risk of severe outcomes, including mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, or death, in current PPI users (n = 4473) compared with never users. Propensity score matching was applied to control for confounding. Finally, we performed an updated meta-analysis on risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mortality attributable to PPI use. RESULTS Current PPI use was associated with increased risk of infection; adjusted odds ratio, 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.13). Among SARS-CoV-2 cases, PPI use was associated with increased risk of hospital admission; adjusted relative risk, 1.13 (1.03-1.24), but not with other severe outcomes. The updated meta-analysis showed no association between PPI use and risk of infection or mortality; pooled odds ratio, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.75-1.32) and relative risk, 1.33 (95% CI, 0.71-2.48). CONCLUSIONS Current PPI use may be associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission, but these results with minimally elevated estimates are most likely subject to residual confounding. No association was found for severe outcomes. The results from the meta-analysis indicated no impact of current PPI use on COVID-19 outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Bastrup Israelsen
- Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
| | - Martin Thomsen Ernst
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Andreas Lundh
- Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre; Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense and Cochrane Denmark, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
| | - Lene Fogt Lundbo
- Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre
| | - Håkon Sandholdt
- Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre
| | - Jesper Hallas
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense; Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Thomas Benfield
- Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen
| |
Collapse
|