Serological Cross-Reactions between Expressed VP2 Proteins from Different Bluetongue Virus Serotypes

Impact of VP2 structure on antigenicity: comparison of BTV1 and the highly virulent BTV8 serotype

Bluetongue virus (BTV) is an agriculturally and economically significant insect-borne virus that causes serious illness and death in sheep and other domestic and wild ruminants in large areas of the world. Numerous BTV serotypes exist, and distant serotypes exhibit unique neutralizing antibody profiles, which target the outermost capsid protein VP2. The predominant serotype-specific nature of the antibody response to VP2 is a barrier to the development of broad-spectrum prophylactic BTV vaccine candidates. Although VP2 is the main serotype determinant of BTV, the structural basis of serotype specificity has not been investigated. In this study, we utilized the recently available atomic structure of VP2 with a modeled tip domain to carry out in silico structural comparisons between distant serotypes BTV1 and BTV8. These analyses identified structural differences in the tip domain, positioned at the apex of VP2, and informed the design of mutant VP2 constructs. Dissection of tip domain antigenicity demonstrated that the region of structural difference between BTV1 and highly virulent BTV8 was a target of BTV neutralizing antibodies and that mutation of this region resulted in a loss of neutralizing antibody recognition. This study has for the first time provided insights into the structural differences, which underpin the serotype-specific neutralizing antibody response to BTV.IMPORTANCEThe immune system can protect against virus infection by producing antibodies, which bind and inhibit the virus from infecting the susceptible host. These antibodies are termed neutralizing antibodies and generally target the viral receptor binding protein, such as the VP2 of bluetongue virus (BTV). This pressure from the immune system can drive mutation of the viral protein resulting in escape from antibody-mediated neutralization and the evolution of serotypes, as is the case for BTV. Understanding the structural differences, which underpin the different BTV serotypes, could help guide the design of a BTV vaccine that targets multiple serotypes. In this study, we have mapped the VP2 structural differences between distant serotypes, to a region targeted by neutralizing antibodies, and have demonstrated for the first time how VP2 structure is the fundamental basis of serotype specificity.

Co-expression of VP2, NS1 and NS2-Nt proteins by an MVA viral vector induces complete protection against bluetongue virus

Introduction

Bluetongue (BT), caused by bluetongue virus (BTV), is an important arthropod-borne livestock disease listed by the World Organization for Animal Health. Live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines have permitted to control BT but they do not simultaneously protect against the myriad of BTV serotypes. Recently, we identified the highly conserved BTV nonstructural protein NS1 and the N-terminal region of NS2 as antigens capable of conferring multiserotype protection against BTV.

Methods

Here, we designed Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) viral vectors that expressed BTV-4 proteins VP2 or VP7 along with NS1 and NS2-Nt as well as MVAs that expressed proteins VP2, VP7 or NS1 and NS2-Nt.

Results

Immunization of IFNAR(-/-) mice with two doses of MVA-NS1-2A-NS2-Nt protected mice from BTV-4M infection by the induction of an antigen-specific T cell immune response. Despite rMVA expressing VP7 alone were not protective in the IFNAR(-/-) mouse model, inclusion of VP7 in the vaccine formulation amplified the cell-mediated response induced by NS1 and NS2-Nt. Expression of VP2 elicited protective non-cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) in immunized animals and improved the protection observed in the MVA-NS1-2A-NS2-Nt immunized mice when these three BTV antigens were co-expressed. Moreover, vaccines candidates co-expressing VP2 or VP7 along with NS1 and NS2-Nt provided multiserotype protection. We assessed protective efficacy of both vaccine candidates in sheep against virulent challenge with BTV-4M.

Discussion

Immunization with MVA-VP7-NS1-2A-NS2-Nt partially dumped viral replication and clinical disease whereas administration of MVA-VP2-NS1-2A-NS2-Nt promoted a complete protection, preventing viraemia and the pathology produced by BTV infection.

Clinical presentation, medical management, and outcomes in 35 hospitalized sheep diagnosed with bluetongue virus disease

BACKGROUND

There is only limited information on the clinical presentation, medical management, and outcomes of hospitalized sheep diagnosed with bluetongue virus (BTV) disease.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the signalment, history, clinical signs, clinicopathological findings, medical management, and clinical outcomes of sheep diagnosed with BTV disease.

ANIMALS

Thirty-five hospitalized sheep with BTV disease.

METHODS

Retrospective case series. Medical records from 1989 to 2021 were evaluated. History, signalment, clinical signs, laboratory test results, treatments, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

BTV disease was diagnosed from July to December, with a peak proportion (43%; 15/35) of diagnoses recorded in October. Pyrexia and anorexia, respiratory disease, vasculitis, coronitis and lameness, and ulcerative mucosal lesions were present in 71%, 71%, 66%, 49%, and 22% of sheep, respectively. BTV serotypes 10, 11, 13, and 17 were identified, with serotype 17 (75%) being the most frequent. Management of cases included administration of antimicrobials (89%), anti-inflammatories (77%), IV fluids (60%), vitamins (20%), proton-pump inhibitors (14%), diuretics (9%), and antioxidants (9%). Six ewes were pregnant on presentation, but none aborted. Six (17%) sheep died or were euthanized because of clinical deterioration, whereas 83% were discharged.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The proportion of sheep that survived BTV disease after treatment was relatively high. Serotyping of BTV is recommended because of the mismatch between frequently identified serotypes and the serotype present in the vaccine.

Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus: Current Knowledge and Emerging Perspectives

Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease (EHD) of ruminants is a viral pathology that has significant welfare, social, and economic implications. The causative agent, epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV), belongs to the Orbivirus genus and leads to significant regional disease outbreaks among livestock and wildlife in North America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania, causing significant morbidity and mortality. During the past decade, this viral disease has become a real threat for countries of the Mediterranean basin, with the recent occurrence of several important outbreaks in livestock. Moreover, the European Union registered the first cases of EHDV ever detected within its territory. Competent vectors involved in viral transmission, Culicoides midges, are expanding its distribution, conceivably due to global climate change. Therefore, livestock and wild ruminants around the globe are at risk for this serious disease. This review provides an overview of current knowledge about EHDV, including changes of distribution and virulence, an examination of different animal models of disease, and a discussion about potential treatments to control the disease.

Increased Clinical Signs and Mortality in IFNAR(-/-) Mice Immunised with the Bluetongue Virus Outer-Capsid Proteins VP2 or VP5, after Challenge with an Attenuated Heterologous Serotype

Bluetongue is an economically important disease of domesticated and wild ruminants caused by bluetongue virus (BTV). There are at least 36 different serotypes of BTV (the identity of which is determined by its outer-capsid protein VP2), most of which are transmitted by Culicoides biting midges. IFNAR^(-/-) mice immunised with plant-expressed outer-capsid protein VP2 (rVP2) of BTV serotypes -1, -4 or -8, or the smaller outer-capsid protein rVP5 of BTV-10, or mock-immunised with PBS, were subsequently challenged with virulent strains of BTV-4 or BTV-8, or with an attenuated clone of BTV-1 (BTV-1RG_C7). The mice that had received rVP2 generated a protective immune response against the homologous BTV serotype, reducing viraemia (as detected by qRT-PCR), the severity of clinical signs and mortality levels. No cross-serotype protection was observed after challenge with the heterologous BTV serotypes. However, the severity of clinical signs, viraemia and fatality levels after challenge with the attenuated strain of BTV-1 were all increased in mice immunised with rVP2 of BTV-4 and BTV-8, or with rVP5 of BTV10. The possibility is discussed that non-neutralising antibodies, reflecting serological relationships between the outer-capsid proteins of these different BTV serotypes, could lead to 'antibody-dependent enhancement of infection' (ADE). Such interactions could affect the epidemiology and emergence of different BTV strains in the field and would therefore be relevant to the design and implementation of vaccination campaigns.

Development of ELISA for the detection of antibodies against VP2 protein of bluetongue virus serotype-1

Serotype-specific diagnosis of bluetongue virus (BTV) is necessary for sero-surveillance and taking effective control measures. The VP2 is the major serotype determining protein and BTV-1 is the most predominant serotype in India. In the present study, an indirect ELISA (i-ELISA) was optimized for the detection of serotype-specific antibody against BTV-1 serotype. The VP2 protein of BTV-1 was expressed in a prokaryotic expression system and used to optimize i-ELISA to detect VP2 antibodies of BTV-1 in serum samples of both small and large ruminants. Serum samples (n = 363) classified as positive and negative for antibodies to BTV-1 by serum neutralization test (SNT) and also positive and negative for BTV antibodies by c-ELSIA kit (VMRD, USA) were used to determine the cut-off value, diagnostic sensitivity (DSn), and diagnostic specificity (D-Sp) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The percent positivity (PP) value >30.10% was accepted as the cut-off for i-ELISA at which DSn of 99.52% and D-Sp of 99.35% was observed with a 95% confidence interval. Further, there was no cross-reactivity with other available BTV serotypes in the country. The study indicated serotype-specific i-ELISA is sensitive, specific and suitable alternative to tedious SNT method for determining serotype. The assay will also help in the serotype-specific epidemiological studies and implementation of future control strategies including vaccination and selection of suitable serotype as a vaccine candidate.

Vaccination as a Strategy to Prevent Bluetongue Virus Vertical Transmission

Bluetongue virus (BTV) produces an economically important disease in ruminants of compulsory notification to the OIE. BTV is typically transmitted by the bite of Culicoides spp., however, some BTV strains can be transmitted vertically, and this is associated with fetus malformations and abortions. The viral factors associated with the virus potency to cross the placental barrier are not well defined. The potency of vertical transmission is retained and sometimes even increased in live attenuated BTV vaccine strains. Because BTV possesses a segmented genome, the possibility of reassortment of vaccination strains with wild-type virus could even favor the transmission of this phenotype. In the present review, we will describe the non-vector-based BTV infection routes and discuss the experimental vaccination strategies that offer advantages over this drawback of some live attenuated BTV vaccines.