1
|
Kolomba BM, Kalenga Luhembwe F, Ndala DBB, Kanku Wa Ilunga P, Ciamala Mukendi P, Ngongo Kitenge A, Ngoy Lumbule J, Kilolo Ngoy E, Umba Ilunga A, Mbidi Miema J, Mwavita CK, Mwamba GN, Wa Bene AC, Wakamba AM, Ngongo AN, Kabamba Nzaji M. Healthcare workers' willingness to receive COVID-19 booster dose and associated factors in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2357214. [PMID: 38783665 PMCID: PMC11135840 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2357214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 booster dose is considered an important adjunct for the control of the COVID-19 pandemic due to reports of reduced immunity in fully vaccinated individuals. The aims of this study were to assess healthcare workers' intention to receive the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine and to identify predictive factors among healthcare workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers selected in two provinces, Kasai Oriental, and Haut-Lomami. Data were collected using a questionnaire administered through structured face-to-face interviews, with respondents using a pre-tested questionnaire set up on the Open Data Kit (ODK Collect). All data were analyzed using SPSS v26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Vaccination coverage for COVID-19, considering declarations by health workers, is around 85.9% for the province of Kasai Oriental and 85.8% for Haut-Lomami. A total of 975 responses were collected, 71.4% of health workers at Kasai Oriental and 66.4% from Haut-Lomami declared a definite willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine booster. The duration of protection was the main reason for accepting a booster COVID-19 dose for 64.6% of the respondents. Logistic regression analysis showed that having chronic diseases (aOR = 2.95 [1.65-5.28]), having already received one of the COVID-19 vaccines (aOR = 2.72 [1.43-5. 19]); the belief that only high-risk individuals, such as healthcare professionals and elderly people suffering from other illnesses, needed a booster dose (aOR = 1.75 [1.10-2.81]). Considering the burden of COVID-19, a high acceptance rate for booster doses could be essential to control the pandemic. Our results are novel and could help policymakers design and implement specific COVID-19 vaccination programs to reduce reluctance to seek booster vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertin Mindje Kolomba
- Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | - Deca Blood Banza Ndala
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nursing Care Section, Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | | | - Paul Ciamala Mukendi
- Department of Teaching and Administration in Nursing, Nursing Section, Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Mbuji-Mayi, Mbuji-Mayi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Amide Ngongo Kitenge
- School of Public Health, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - John Ngoy Lumbule
- School of Public Health, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Elie Kilolo Ngoy
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Antoine Umba Ilunga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Judith Mbidi Miema
- Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Christelle Kalikat Mwavita
- Ministry of Health, National Expanded Program for Immunization, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic Of Congo
| | - Guillaume Ngoy Mwamba
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Ministry of Health, National Expanded Program for Immunization, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic Of Congo
| | - Aime Cikomola Wa Bene
- Ministry of Health, National Expanded Program for Immunization, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic Of Congo
| | - Audry Mulumba Wakamba
- Ministry of Health, National Expanded Program for Immunization, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic Of Congo
| | | | - Michel Kabamba Nzaji
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kamina, Kamina, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Ministry of Health, National Expanded Program for Immunization, Kinshasa, The Democratic Republic Of Congo
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roy DN, Ferdiousi N, Mohabbot Hossen M, Islam E, Shah Azam M. Global disparities in COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (VBD) acceptance and hesitancy: An updated narrative review. Vaccine X 2024; 18:100480. [PMID: 38585380 PMCID: PMC10997838 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The global deployment of COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (VBD) has been recognized as a promising therapeutic alliance to provide repeated immunity against the arrival of new variants. Despite scientific evidence supports the effectiveness of periodic doses, COVID-19 vaccine booster reluctance continues to thrive. This narrative review aimed to examine global COVID-19 vaccine booster dose (VBD) acceptance and summarize an up-to-date assessment of potential antecedents associated with VBD acceptance. A comprehensive search was performed in several reputable databases such as Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Google scholar, and Web of Science from June 10th, 2023, to August 1st, 2023. All relevant descriptive and observational studies on COVID-19 VBD acceptance and hesitancy were included in this review. A total of fifty-eight (58) studies were included, with Asia representing the highest count with thirty-one (53%) studies, Europe with eleven (19 %), the United States with nine (16 %), and other regions (Africa and multi-ethnic) with seven (12 %). Worldwide, the pooled COVID-19 VBD acceptance rate was 77.09 % (95 % CI: 76.28-78.18), VBD willingness (n) = 164189, and the total sample (N) = 212,990. The highest and the lowest VBD acceptance rate was reported in Europe and American regions, respectively, 85.38 % (95 % CI: 85.02-85.73, (n) = 32,047, (N = 37,533) vs. 66.92 % (95 % CI: 66.56-67.4), (n) = 29335, (N) = 43,832. However, Asia and multi-ethnic areas reported moderately high VBD acceptance rate 79.13 % (95 % CI: 78.77-79.23, (n) = 93,994, (N) = 11,8779) and 72.16 % (95 % CI: 71.13-72.93, (n) = 9276, (N) = 12,853), respectively. The most common and key antecedents of COVID-19 VBD acceptance and hesitancy across the countries were "equal safety", "efficacy", "effectiveness", "post-vaccination side effects", "community protection" "family protection", "risk-benefit ratio", "booster necessity", "trust", and "variants control". Disparities in the uptake of COVID-19 VBD were observed globally, with the highest rates found in Europe, and the lowest rates in American regions. Multiple potential antecedents including safety, efficacy, and post-vaccination side effects were associated with VBD acceptance and hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debendra Nath Roy
- Department of Pharmacy, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore 7408, Bangladesh
- Institute of Education and Research, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
| | - Nowrin Ferdiousi
- Department of Pharmacy, Mawlana Bhasani Science and Technology University, Tangail 1902, Bangladesh
| | | | - Ekramul Islam
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
| | - Md. Shah Azam
- Department of Marketing, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
- Office of the Viec-Chancellor, Rabindra University, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khoo CMJ, Dea EZQ, Law LY, Wong SST, Ng KY, Bakhtiar A. Acceptability of COVID-19 booster vaccine in malaysia: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8421. [PMID: 38600166 PMCID: PMC11006945 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59195-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the high efficacy and safety demonstrated in clinical trials, COVID-19 booster vaccination rates in Malaysia remain below 50% among the general public. This study explores the factors influencing public acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccine among the Malaysian population. The questionnaire included variables on sociodemographics, knowledge, and the Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs. Based on the Chi-squared test of contingencies, a t-test and multivariate logistic regression analysis on 411 collected responses, the findings revealed that older participants, individuals of Chinese ethnicity, and those with higher education levels and incomes were more willing to accept booster vaccinations. The analysis further identified perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived barriers as significant predictors influencing booster vaccination acceptance rates. Healthcare policymakers may consider targeting interventions to diminish the obstacles associated with booster vaccinations. These intervention strategies include implementing health intervention programmes, such as public health awareness initiatives, to raise awareness of the risks and severity of COVID-19, ultimately encouraging higher uptake of booster vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Minn Jee Khoo
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Eve Zhi Qing Dea
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Li Yeow Law
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Sharon Siew Tong Wong
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Khuen Yen Ng
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Athirah Bakhtiar
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang L, Yang J, Su R, Lan X, Song M, Zhang L, Xu J. Willingness to receive the second booster of COVID-19 vaccine among older adults with cancer: a stratified analysis in four provinces of China. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1298070. [PMID: 38454989 PMCID: PMC10917962 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1298070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the elevated COVID-19 risk for older adults with cancer, vaccine hesitancy poses a significant barrier to their immunization. Intriguingly, there is limited research on the prevalence of willingness to receive the second booster dose and associated determinants in older adults with cancer. Objective Our objective was to ascertain the level of awareness about COVID-19 vaccines and to uncover the factors influencing the willingness to receive the second booster among Chinese cancer patients aged 65 years and over. Methods To achieve our objective, we conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study in four tertiary hospitals from four provinces of China. This involved using a Health Belief Model (HBM) based self-administered questionnaire and medical records. Subsequently, we employed multivariable logistic regression to identify factors influencing the second COVID-19 booster vaccine willingness. Results Our results showed that among 893 eligible participants, 279 (31.24%) were aged 65 years and over, and 614 (68.76%) were younger. Interestingly, the willingness to receive the second COVID-19 booster vaccine was 34.1% (95/279) (OR: 1.043, 95% CI: 0.858, 1.267) in participants aged 65 years and over, which was similar to participants aged under 65 years (34.1% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.673). Furthermore, our findings revealed that a positive attitude toward the booster and recommendations from healthcare providers and family members were positively associated with vaccine willingness. Conversely, perceptions of negative impacts on cancer control and vaccine accessibility regarding the second COVID-19 booster were inversely related to the outcome event (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Our study concludes with the finding of a low willingness toward the second COVID-19 booster in Chinese cancer patients, particularly in the older adults, a fact which warrants attention. This reluctance raises their risk of infection and potential for severe outcomes. Consequently, we recommend using media and community outreach to dispel misconceptions, promote the booster's benefits, and encourage vaccine discussions with healthcare providers and family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangyuan Zhang
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Jianzhou Yang
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China
| | - Rila Su
- Cancer Center of Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Xinquan Lan
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Moxin Song
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Junjie Xu
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chai R, Yang J, Su R, Lan X, Song M, Zhang L, Xu J. Low uptake of COVID-19 booster doses among elderly cancer patients in China: A multicentre cross-sectional study. J Glob Health 2024; 14:05010. [PMID: 38303680 PMCID: PMC10835334 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.05010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination is a crucial measure to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The elderly and cancer populations both are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and have higher mortality. However, the uptake of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses among elderly cancer patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and associates of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses uptake in elderly cancer patients. Methods A multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted in four general populations of China province from April to June 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as COVID-19 vaccination status and reasons for not uptake booster doses, were collected through face-to-face interviews and medical records. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to explore the associates of the first COVID-19 booster dose vaccination uptake of cancer patients. Results A total of 893 cancer patients were eventually included in this study, of which 279 (31.24%) were aged 65 or older and 614 (68.76%) were under 65 years old. The proportion of the first COVID-19 vaccine booster dose among cancer patients aged 65 and above was lower than among adults aged 65 (23.66 vs. 31.92%). Factors affecting individual-level variables among the aged 65 and above cancer patients group whether to uptake the first COVID-19 booster dose were negative attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, perceived subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and other types of chronic disease. There is no significant difference in the incidence of related adverse reactions between the two age groups (P = 0.19). Conclusions Low uptake of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses among elderly cancer patients is a significant concern and implies high susceptibility and high fatality when facing the emergence of SARS Cov-2 outbreak. Efforts to improve vaccine education and accessibility, particularly in rural areas, may help increase uptake and reduce the spread of SARS-Cov-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiyu Chai
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Jianzhou Yang
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Rila Su
- Cancer Center of Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Xinquan Lan
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- Department of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Moxin Song
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- Department of Epidemiology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Junjie Xu
- Clinical Research Academy, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang LL, Hong WW, Hu WW, Guan XH, Jiang YH. Understanding factors affecting Chinese medical staff's fear of receiving the fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine: A cross-sectional study in Taizhou. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2261201. [PMID: 37920885 PMCID: PMC10627059 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2261201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The study was conducted to assess medical staffs' fear of receiving the fourth dose of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. From December 17, 2022, to January 31, 2023, an online survey was conducted to assess the fear among medical staffs regarding the administration of the fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The participants were exclusively drawn from a tertiary grade hospital in Taizhou. Out of the 1, 832 medical staffs invited to participate in the questionnaire, a total of 613 (33.5%) provided valid responses for subsequent analysis. Among them, 81 (13.8%) expressed fear of receiving the fourth dose of COVID-19. The fear was significantly influenced by these factors: the presence of serious food/drug allergic reactions (OR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.40-10.52), received booster COVID-19 vaccine (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.35), opinion on vaccination requirement (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.35), viewpoint (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.12-0.44) with scores ≥10, and positive attitude toward vaccination (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.35). Our study revealed that a subset of medical staffs still harbor apprehension toward receiving the fourth dose of the new COVID-19 vaccine. Factors influencing this fear encompass allergic reactions, booster COVID-19 vaccine, as well as opinion, viewpoint, and attitude toward vaccination. Educating medical staffs on these factors may help mitigate their fear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Li Huang
- Department of Emergency, Taizhou First People’s Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei-Wen Hong
- Department of Anus & Intestine Surgery, Taizhou First People’s Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei-Wei Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Taizhou First People’s Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xian-Hua Guan
- Intensive Care Unit, Taizhou First People’s Hospital, Huangyan, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Outpatient, Taizhou First People’s Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alam Z, Mohamed S, Nauman J, Al-Rifai RH, Ahmed LA, Elbarazi I. Hesitancy toward vaccination against COVID-19: A scoping review of prevalence and associated factors in the Arab world. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2245720. [PMID: 37594508 PMCID: PMC10443971 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2245720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite widespread availability of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 virus, the cause of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), its uptake in many Arab countries is relatively low. This literature review aimed to scope evidence on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (VH) in the Arab world. A total of 134 articles reporting prevalence of COVID-19 VH and associated factors, conducted in any of the 22 Arab League countries, were reviewed. COVID-19 VH prevalence ranged from 5.4% to 83.0%. Female gender, young age, low education level and lack of previous influenza vaccine uptake were most commonly reported to be associated with COVID-19 VH. The most-reported personal concerns contributing toward VH were related to the rapid development, safety and side effects of vaccine, as well as an overall lack of trust in government policies toward pandemic control and widespread conspiracy theories. Tailored interventions to enable the distribution of trusted information and enhance public acceptance of immunization are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zufishan Alam
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Salma Mohamed
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Javaid Nauman
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL-PIVOT) Network, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rami H. Al-Rifai
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Luai A. Ahmed
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
- Zayed Centre for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Iffat Elbarazi
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nikoloski Z, Aliyev E, Bain RES, Menchini L, Hegazi S, Zalkha M, Mouawad S, Kapil N, Gillespie AM. COVID-19 Vaccination Personas in Syria: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Survey. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1109. [PMID: 37376498 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Achieving a high level of COVID-19 vaccination coverage in a conflict-affected setting is challenging. The objective of this paper is to shed further light on the main determinants of vaccination coverage using a large, cross-sectional sample (October-November 2022) of over 17,000 adults in Syria. We find evidence that certain demographic and socioeconomic characteristics describe a core set of vaccination personas. Men, older respondents, and those who are more educated and trust information received from healthcare authorities are more likely to be vaccinated. Healthcare workers in this sample are highly vaccinated. Furthermore, respondents with more positive views towards COVID-19 vaccines are also more likely to be willing to be vaccinated. By contrast, respondents who believe that vaccines are associated with significant side effects are also more likely to refuse vaccination. In addition, younger respondents and women, as well as those with a lower level of education, are more likely to refuse to be vaccinated. Respondents with a neutral attitude towards vaccines are also more likely to be undecided, whereas respondents who are refusing to get vaccinated are more likely to trust the information received from private doctors, private clinics, as well as social media and, more broadly, the internet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zlatko Nikoloski
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Elnur Aliyev
- UNICEF Syria Office, Damascus P.O. Box 9413, Syria
| | - Robert E S Bain
- Regional Office for the Middle East and North Africa, Amman 11821, Jordan
| | - Leonardo Menchini
- Regional Office for the Middle East and North Africa, Amman 11821, Jordan
| | - Sahar Hegazi
- UNICEF Syria Office, Damascus P.O. Box 9413, Syria
| | - Mai Zalkha
- UNICEF Syria Office, Damascus P.O. Box 9413, Syria
| | | | - Neha Kapil
- Regional Office for the Middle East and North Africa, Amman 11821, Jordan
| | - Amaya M Gillespie
- Regional Office for the Middle East and North Africa, Amman 11821, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deng X, Zhao Y, Wang S, He H, Chen Z, Zhou Y, Yan R, Tang X, Zhu Y, Xu X. Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Hesitancy Using the Modified 5C Scale in Zhejiang Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030706. [PMID: 36992290 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Following the rollout of a booster campaign to promote immunity against COVID-19 in China, this study aimed to assess booster hesitancy among adults who were fully vaccinated with primary doses across Zhejiang Province. Firstly, the modified 5C scale developed by a German research team was assessed for reliability and validity via a pre-survey in Zhejiang Province. Then, a 30-item questionnaire was established to conduct online and offline surveys during 10 November to 15 December 2021. Demographic characteristics and information on previous vaccination experience, vaccine type of primary doses, attitudes towards booster doses and awareness of SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected. Chi-square tests, pairwise comparison and multivariate logistic regression were performed in data analysis. In total, 4039 valid questionnaires were analyzed, with booster hesitancy of 14.81%. Dissatisfaction with previous vaccination experience of primary doses (ORs = 1.771~8.025), less confidence in COVID-19 vaccines (OR = 3.511, 95%CI: 2.874~4.310), younger age compared to the elderly aged 51-60 years old (2.382, 1.274~4.545), lower education level (ORs = 1.707~2.100), weaker awareness of social responsibility of prevention and control of COVID-19 (1.587, 1.353~1.859), inconvenience of booster vaccination (1.539, 1.302~1.821), complacency regarding vaccine efficacy as well as self-health status (1.224, 1.056~1.415) and excessive trade-offs before vaccination (1.184, 1.005~1.398) were positively associated with booster hesitancy. Therefore, intelligent means should be strengthened to optimize vaccination services. More influential experts and other significant figures should be supported to promote timely evidence-based information via various media platforms to reduce public hesitancy and increase booster uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Deng
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Yuchen Zhao
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Shenyu Wang
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
- Department of Epidemiology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
| | - Hanqing He
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Zhiping Chen
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Yang Zhou
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Rui Yan
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Xuewen Tang
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| | - Xiaoping Xu
- Department of Immunization Program, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ayyalasomayajula S, Dhawan A, Karattuthodi MS, Thorakkattil SA, Abdulsalim S, Elnaem MH, Sridhar S, Unnikrishnan MK. A Systematic Review on Sociodemographic, Financial and Psychological Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Hesitancy among Adult Population. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030623. [PMID: 36992207 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: While considerable evidence supports the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, a sizable population expresses vaccine hesitancy. As per the World Health Organization, vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 hazards to global health. Vaccine hesitancy varies across countries, with India reporting the least vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy was higher toward COVID-19 booster doses than previous shots. Therefore, identifying factors determining COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitance (VBH) is the sine qua non of a successful vaccination campaign. Methodology: This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 standards. A total of 982 articles were pooled from Scopus, PubMed and Embase, while 42 articles that addressed the factors of COVID-19 VBH were finally included for further analysis. Result: We identified factors responsible for VBH and divided them into three major groups: sociodemographic, financial, and psychological. Hence, 17 articles stated age to be a major factor for vaccine hesitancy, with most reports suggesting a negative correlation between age and fear of poor vaccination outcomes. Nine studies found females expressing greater vaccine hesitancy than males. Trust deficit in science (n = 14), concerns about safety and efficacy (n = 12), lower levels of fear regarding infection (n = 11), and worry about side effects (n = 8) were also reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Blacks, Democrats, and pregnant women showed high vaccine hesitancy. Few studies have stated income, obesity, social media, and the population living with vulnerable members as factors influencing vaccine hesitancy. A study in India showed that 44.1% of vaccine hesitancy towards booster doses could be attributed dominantly to low income, rural origin, previously unvaccinated status, or living with vulnerable individuals. However, two other Indian studies reported a lack of availability of vaccination slots, a lack of trust in the government, and concerns regarding safety as factors for vaccine hesitancy toward booster doses. Conclusion: Many studies have confirmed the multifactorial nature of VBH, which necessitates multifaceted, individually tailored interventions that address all potentially modifiable factors. This systematic review chiefly recommends strategizing the campaign for booster doses by identifying and evaluating the reasons for vaccine hesitancy, followed by appropriate communication (at both individual and community levels) about the benefits of booster doses and the risk of losing immunity without them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Ayyalasomayajula
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar 576104, India
| | - Aditi Dhawan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar 576104, India
| | - Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhav Nagar 576104, India
| | | | - Suhaj Abdulsalim
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Unaizah College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed Hassan Elnaem
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town 11800, Malaysia
| | - Sathvik Sridhar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, RAK College of Pharmacy, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah 11172, United Arab Emirates
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Why Some People Are Hesitant to Receive COVID-19 Boosters: A Systematic Review. Trop Med Infect Dis 2023; 8:tropicalmed8030159. [PMID: 36977160 PMCID: PMC10054177 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed8030159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues and transitions to an endemic stage, booster vaccines will play an important role in personal and public health. However, convincing people to take boosters continues to be a key obstacle. This study systematically analyzed research that examined the predictors of COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy. A search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus uncovered 42 eligible studies. Globally, the average COVID-19 booster vaccination hesitancy rate was 30.72%. Thirteen key factors influencing booster hesitancy emerged from the literature: demographics (gender, age, education, income, occupation, employment status, ethnicity, and marital status), geographical influences (country, region, and residency), adverse events, perceived benefit/efficacy, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, prior history of COVID-19 infection, vaccination status, vaccination recommendations, health status, knowledge and information, skepticism/distrust/conspiracy theories, and vaccine type. Vaccine communication campaigns and interventions for COVID boosters should focus on factors influencing booster confidence, complacency, and convenience.
Collapse
|
12
|
Della Polla G, Miraglia del Giudice G, Folcarelli L, Napoli A, Angelillo IF. Willingness to accept a second COVID-19 vaccination booster dose among healthcare workers in Italy. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1051035. [PMID: 36568799 PMCID: PMC9780496 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is evolving,the newly emerged Omicron variant being the dominant strain worldwide, and this has raised concerns about vaccine efficacy. The purposes of this survey were to examine the extent to which healthcare workers (HCWs) intend to receive a second booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and the factors that influence their willingness to accept it. Methods The study was conducted among HCWs who were randomly selected from four public hospitals in the Campania region, Southern Italy. Results A total of 496 HCWs answered the questionnaire (a response rate of 61.2%). Among the respondents, 20.8% indicated a score of 10, using a 10-point Likert-type scale, regarding the usefulness of a second COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. Physicians, HCWs who believed that COVID-19 was a severe disease, and those who have acquired information about the second booster dose from scientific journals were more likely to have this positive attitude. Slightly more than half of HCWs self-reported willingness to receive a second booster dose. Respondents who believe that HCWs are at higher risk of being infected by SARS-CoV-2, those who have a higher belief that COVID-19 is a severe disease, and those who have a higher belief that a second booster dose is useful were more willing to receive a second booster dose. The main reasons for those who had a positive intention were to protect their family members and patients, whereas, the main reasons for not getting vaccinated or for uncertainty were that the dose does not offer protection against the emerging variants and the fear of its side effects. HCWs of younger age, physicians, those who have a higher belief that a second booster dose is useful, and those who were willing to receive a second booster dose were more likely to recommend the booster dose to their patients. Conclusion This study's findings highlight the necessity for designing and implementing educational interventions for improving second booster dose uptake and beliefs among HCWs and their capacity to recommend the vaccine to the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgia Della Polla
- Department of Public Health and Laboratory Services, Teaching Hospital, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Lucio Folcarelli
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Napoli
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Italo Francesco Angelillo
- Department of Public Health and Laboratory Services, Teaching Hospital, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy,Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy,*Correspondence: Italo Francesco Angelillo
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghazy RM, Abdou MS, Awaidy S, Sallam M, Elbarazi I, Youssef N, Fiidow OA, Mehdad S, Hussein MF, Adam MF, Abdullah FSA, Rebai WK, Raad EB, Hussein M, Shehata SF, Ismail II, Salam AA, Samhouri D. Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Using the Health Belief Model: A Cross-Sectional Study in Low-Middle- and High-Income Countries of the East Mediterranean Region. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191912136. [PMID: 36231447 PMCID: PMC9566578 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) booster doses decrease infection transmission and disease severity. This study aimed to assess the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses in low, middle, and high-income countries of the East Mediterranean Region (EMR) and its determinants using the health belief model (HBM). In addition, we aimed to identify the causes of booster dose rejection and the main source of information about vaccination. Using the snowball and convince sampling technique, a bilingual, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire was used to collect the data from 14 EMR countries through different social media platforms. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the key determinants that predict vaccination acceptance among respondents. Overall, 2327 participants responded to the questionnaire. In total, 1468 received compulsory doses of vaccination. Of them, 739 (50.3%) received booster doses and 387 (26.4%) were willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine booster doses. Vaccine booster dose acceptance rates in low, middle, and high-income countries were 73.4%, 67.9%, and 83.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). Participants who reported reliance on information about the COVID-19 vaccination from the Ministry of Health websites were more willing to accept booster doses (79.3% vs. 66.6%, p < 0.001). The leading causes behind booster dose rejection were the beliefs that booster doses have no benefit (48.35%) and have severe side effects (25.6%). Determinants of booster dose acceptance were age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.03, p = 0.002), information provided by the Ministry of Health (OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.79-6.49, p = 0.015), perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 infection (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.21-2.93, p = 0.005), perceived severity of COVID-19 (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 137-3.16, p = 0.001), and perceived risk of side effects (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.19-0.34, p < 0.001). Booster dose acceptance in EMR is relatively high. Interventions based on HBM may provide useful directions for policymakers to enhance the population's acceptance of booster vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramy Mohamed Ghazy
- Tropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21561, Egypt
- Correspondence:
| | - Marwa Shawky Abdou
- Department of Epidemiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21561, Egypt
| | - Salah Awaidy
- Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Muscat 100, Oman
| | - Malik Sallam
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Department of Clinical Laboratories and Forensic Medicine, Jordan University Hospital, Amman 11942, Jordan
- Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 22184 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Iffat Elbarazi
- Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, AlAin 15551, United Arab Emirates
| | - Naglaa Youssef
- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Osman Abubakar Fiidow
- School of Public Health and Research, Somali National University, Mogadishu P.O. Box 15, Somalia
| | - Slimane Mehdad
- Physiology and Physiopathology Research Team, Research Centre of Human Pathology Genomics, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University, Rabat BP 8007, Morocco
| | - Mohamed Fakhry Hussein
- Occupational Health and Industrial Medicine Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
| | | | | | | | - Etwal Bou Raad
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut P.O. Box 110236, Lebanon
- School of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut P.O. Box 146404, Lebanon
| | - Mai Hussein
- Clinical Research Administration, Alexandria Directorate of Health Affairs, Egyptian Ministry of Health and Population, Alexandria 21554, Egypt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Shehata F. Shehata
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
- Biostatistics Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21561, Egypt
| | - Ismail Ibrahim Ismail
- Department of Neurology, Ibn Sina Hospital, Gamal Abdel Nasser Street, Sabah Medical Area, Safat 070001, Kuwait
| | | | - Dalia Samhouri
- Emergency Preparedness and International Health Regulations, WHO EMRO (DS), P.O. Box 7608, Naser City 11371, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|