Identification and management of frailty in English primary care: a qualitative study of national policy

Does proactive care in care homes improve survival? A quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

NHS England's 'Enhanced Health in Care Homes' specification aims to make the healthcare of care home residents more proactive. Primary care networks (PCNs) are contracted to provide this, but approaches vary widely: challenges include frailty identification, multidisciplinary team (MDT) capability/capacity and how the process is structured and delivered.

AIM

To determine whether a proactive healthcare model could improve healthcare outcomes for care home residents.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Quality improvement project involving 429 residents in 40 care homes in a non-randomised crossover cohort design. The headline outcome was 2-year survival.

METHOD

All care home residents had healthcare coordinated by the PCN's Older Peoples' Hub. A daily MDT managed the urgent healthcare needs of residents. Proactive healthcare, comprising information technology-assisted comprehensive geriatric assessment (i-CGA) and advanced care planning (ACP), were completed by residents, with prioritisation based on clinical needs.Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used with patients divided into two groups:Control group: received routine and urgent (reactive) care only.Intervention group: additional proactive i-CGA and ACP.

RESULTS

By 2 years, control group survival was 8.6% (n=108), compared with 48.1% in the intervention group (n=321), p<0.001. This represented a 39.6% absolute risk reduction in mortality, 70.2% relative risk reduction and the number needed to treat of 2.5, with little changes when adjusting for confounding variables.

CONCLUSION

A PCN with an MDT-hub offering additional proactive care (with an i-CGA and ACP) in addition to routine and urgent/reactive care may improve the 2-year survival in older people compared with urgent/reactive care alone.

How do primary care clinicians approach the management of frailty? A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Around 15% of adults aged over 65 live with moderate or severe frailty. Contractual requirements for management of frailty are minimal and neither incentivised nor reinforced. Previous research has shown frailty identification in primary care is ad hoc and opportunistic, but there has been little focus on the challenges of frailty management, particularly within the context of recent introduction of primary care networks and an expanding allied health professional workforce.

AIM

Explore the views of primary care clinicians in England on the management of frailty.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians across England, including general practitioners (GPs), physician associates, nurse practitioners, paramedics and clinical pharmacists. Thematic analysis was facilitated through NVivo (Version 12).

RESULTS

A total of 31 clinicians participated. Frailty management was viewed as complex and outside of clinical guidelines with medication optimisation highlighted as a key example. Senior clinicians, particularly experienced GPs, were more comfortable with managing risk. Relational care was important in prioritising patient wishes and autonomy, for instance to remain at home despite deteriorations in health. In settings where more formalised multidisciplinary frailty services had been established this was viewed as successful by clinicians involved.

CONCLUSION

Primary care clinicians perceive frailty as best managed through trusted relationships with patients, and with support from experienced clinicians. New multidisciplinary working in primary care could enhance frailty services, but must keep continuity in mind. There is a lack of evidence or guidance for specific interventions or management approaches.

Virtual wards for people with frailty: what works, for whom, how and why-a rapid realist review

BACKGROUND

Virtual wards (VWs) deliver multidisciplinary care at home to people with frailty who are at high risk of a crisis or in crisis, aiming to mitigate the risk of acute hospital admission. Different VW models exist, and evidence of effectiveness is inconsistent.

AIM

We conducted a rapid realist review to identify different VW models and to develop explanations for how and why VWs could deliver effective frailty management.

METHODS

We searched published and grey literature to identify evidence on multidisciplinary VWs. Information on how and why VWs might 'work' was extracted and synthesised into context-mechanism-outcome configurations with input from clinicians and patient/public contributors.

RESULTS

We included 17 peer-reviewed and 11 grey literature documents. VWs could be short-term and acute (1-21 days), or longer-term and preventative (typically 3-7 months). Effective VW operation requires common standards agreements, information sharing processes, an appropriate multidisciplinary team that plans patient care remotely, and good co-ordination. VWs may enable delivery of frailty interventions through appropriate selection of patients, comprehensive assessment including medication review, integrated case management and proactive care. Important components for patients and caregivers are good communication with the VW, their experience of care at home, and feeling involved, safe and empowered to manage their condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Insights gained from this review could inform implementation or evaluation of VWs for frailty. A combination of acute and longer-term VWs may be needed within a whole system approach. Proactive care is recommended to avoid frailty-related crises.

Role of Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease

As the older adult population expands, an increasing number of patients affected by geriatric syndromes are seen by cardiovascular clinicians. One such syndrome that has been associated with poor outcomes is cognitive frailty: the simultaneous presence of cognitive impairment, without evidence of dementia, and physical frailty, which results in decreased cognitive reserve. Driven by common pathophysiologic underpinnings (eg, inflammation and neurohormonal dysregulation), cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and frailty also share the following risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, obesity, sedentary behavior, and tobacco use. Cardiovascular disease has been associated with the onset and progression of cognitive frailty, which may be reversible in early stages, making it essential for clinicians to diagnose the condition in a timely manner and prescribe appropriate interventions. Additional research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the development of cognitive frailty, establish preventive and therapeutic strategies to address the needs of older patients with cardiovascular disease at risk for cognitive frailty, and ultimately facilitate targeted intervention studies.

Developing a framework of concerns from people living with frailty, for the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW) person-centred outcome measure

INTRODUCTION

Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing is a validated person-centred outcome measure, piloted as a core monitoring tool to understand what matters to people living with frailty in Gloucestershire. This paper describes the acceptability of MYCaW used in this setting, and the development of a framework for analysing personalised concerns from people living with frailty.

METHODS

MYCaW was implemented in the Complex Care at Home service and South Cotswold Frailty Service from November 2020 onwards. MYCaW was completed at the person's first meeting with a community matron and then 3 months later. Nineteen staff completed an anonymous survey to provide feedback on the acceptability of the tool. A framework of concerns bespoke to people living with frailty was created via iterative rounds of independent coding of 989 concerns from 526 people. The inter-rater reliability of the framework was determined by using the Cronbach alpha test.

RESULTS

MYCaW was simple to use and helped health professionals' discussions to be patient focused. A pictorial scale accompanying the Numerical Rating Scale was developed and tested to help people engage with scoring their concerns and well-being more easily. A framework of concerns from people living with frailty was produced with five main supercategories: Mental and Emotional Concerns; Physical Concerns; Healthcare and Service Provision Concerns, Concerns with General Health and Well-being and Practical Concerns. Inter-rater reliability was kappa=0.905.

CONCLUSIONS

MYCaW was acceptable as a core monitoring tool for people living with frailty and enabled a systematic approach to opening 'What Matters to Me' conversations. The personalised data generated valuable insights into how the frailty services positively impacted the outcomes for people living with frailty. The coding framework demonstrated a wide range of concerns-many linked to inequalities and not identified on existing outcome measures recommended for people living with frailty.

A nurse-led comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention in primary care: A feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial

AIM

To determine the feasibility of a nurse-led, primary care-based comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) intervention.

DESIGN

A feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The trial was conducted in six general practices in the United Kingdom from May 2018 to April 2020. Participants were moderately/severely frail people aged 65 years and older living at home. Clusters were randomly assigned to the intervention arm control arms. A CGA was delivered to the intervention participants, with control participants receiving usual care. Study outcomes related to feasibility of the intervention and of conducting the trial including recruitment and retention. A range of outcome measures of quality of life, function, loneliness, self-determination, mortality, hospital admission/readmission and number of prescribed medications were evaluated.

RESULTS

All pre-specified feasibility criteria relating to recruitment and retention were met with 56 participants recruited in total (30 intervention and 26 control). Retention was high with 94.6% of participants completing 13-week follow-up and 87.5% (n = 49) completing 26-week follow-up. All outcome measures instruments met feasibility criteria relating to completeness and responsiveness over time. Quality of life was recommended as the primary outcome for a definitive trial with numbers of prescribed medications as a secondary outcome measure.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to implement and conduct a randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led, primary care-based CGA intervention.

IMPACT

The study provided evidence on the feasibility of a CGA intervention for older people delivered in primary care. It provides information to maximize the success of a definitive trial of the clinical effectiveness of the intervention.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patient and public representatives were involved in the study design including intervention development and production of participant-facing documentation. Representatives served on the trial management and steering committees and, as part of this role, interpreted feasibility data. ISRCTN Number: 74345449.

A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home

BACKGROUND

As people age, they are more likely to develop multiple long-term conditions that require complicated medicine regimens. Safely self-managing multiple medicines at home is challenging and how older people can be better supported to do so has not been fully explored.

AIM

This study aimed to identify interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home and the aspects of medicine self-management that they address.

DESIGN

A rapid review was undertaken of publications up to April 2022. Eight databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: interventions aimed at people 65 years of age or older and their informal carers, living at home. Interventions needed to include at least one component of medicine self-management. Study protocols, conference papers, literature reviews and articles not in the English language were not included. The results from the review were reported through narrative synthesis, underpinned by the Resilient Healthcare theory.

RESULTS

Database searches returned 14,353 results. One hundred and sixty-seven articles were individually appraised (full-text screening) and 33 were included in the review. The majority of interventions identified were educational. In most cases, they aimed to improve older people's adherence and increase their knowledge of medicines. Only very few interventions addressed potential issues with medicine supply. Only a minority of interventions specifically targeted older people with either polypharmacy, multimorbidities or frailty.

CONCLUSION

To date, the emphasis in supporting older people to manage their medicines has been on the ability to adhere to medicine regimens. Most interventions identify and target deficiencies within the patient, rather than preparing patients for problems inherent in the medicine management system. Medicine self-management requires a much wider range of skills than taking medicines as prescribed. Interventions supporting older people to anticipate and respond to problems with their medicines may reduce the risk of harm associated with polypharmacy and may contribute to increased resilience in the system.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A patient with lived experience of medicine self-management in older age contributed towards shaping the research question as well as the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this review. She is also the coauthor of this article. A patient advisory group oversaw the study.

Integrated Care for Older People with Different Frailty Levels: A Qualitative Study of Local Implementation of a National Policy in Luton, England

Introduction

The NHS England General Medical Services 2017-18 contract made it mandatory for general practices in England to identify and manage older people proactively. In response to the national policy, the Luton Framework for Frailty (LFF) programme was developed to target older residents of Luton and offer interventions according to their frailty level. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the LFF and the factors that affect the implementation of a proactive integrated care service for older people with different frailty levels (OPDFL).

Methods

We undertook document analyses and conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders to create a 'thick description' that provides insights into the LFF.

Results

Healthy ageing interventions bring beneficial outcomes but to increase the uptake they should be co-produced with older people. A common electronic system within primary care and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) aid implementation. However, variation in implementation across Luton, different levels of buy-in for MDT, and different data systems in primary and secondary care make implementation challenging.

Conclusion

The LFF is a promising initiative and lessons learned are likely to be transferable to other settings as proactive management of frailty takes on greater policy prominence in the UK and worldwide.

What are the implications of problem-solving capacity at Primary Health Care in older adult health?

Objective

To evaluate Primary Health Care attributes and analyze the association between the fulfilment of these attributes and problem-solving capacity of services for elderly patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional, observational, quantitative study. The Primary Care Assessment Tool, designed to assess Primary Health Care attributes, was employed to evaluate elderly users of Primary Care Units located in the south region of the city of São Paulo (SP).

Results

Many attributes assessed at the reference services were considered as unsatisfactory by users. Overall scores were also below the cut-off point. “First contact access – use”, “longitudinality” and “coordination – information system” were the only attributes considered as satisfactory. Also, more than half (62.7%) of respondent patients reported having been referred to specialized services. A combined analysis of these three outcomes revealed users referred to other services had a significantly better perception of Primary Health Care attributes.

Conclusion

The study provides important insights on satisfaction of elderly individuals and the problem-solving capacity of health care services, especially for the study population. Findings reported emphasize the association between Primary Health Care attributes and the problem-solving capacity of health care services at this level.

Predictive Accuracy of Digital Biomarker Technologies for Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Pre-Frailty Amongst Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Digital biomarker technologies coupled with predictive models are increasingly applied for early detection of age-related potentially reversible conditions including mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and pre-frailty (PF). We aimed to determine the predictive accuracy of digital biomarker technologies to detect MCI and PF with systematic review and meta-analysis. A computer-assisted search on major academic research databases including IEEE-Xplore was conducted. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were adopted reporting in this study. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve based on random-effect bivariate model was used to evaluate overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of the respective age-related conditions. A total of 43 studies were selected for final systematic review and meta-analysis. 26 studies reported on detection of MCI with sensitivity and specificity of 0.48-1.00 and 0.55-1.00, respectively. On the other hand, there were 17 studies that reported on the detection of PF with reported sensitivity of 0.53-1.00 and specificity of 0.61-1.00. Meta-analysis further revealed pooled sensitivities of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.88) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.88) for in-home detection of MCI and PF, respectively, while pooled specificities were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.88), respectively. Besides MCI, and PF, in this work during systematic review, we also found one study which reported a sensitivity of 0.93 and a specificity of 0.57 for detection of cognitive frailty (CF). The meta-analytic result, for the first time, quantifies the predictive efficacy of digital biomarker technologies for detection of MCI and PF. Additionally, we found the number of studies for detection of CF to be notably lower, indicating possible research gaps to explore predictive models on digital biomarker technology for detection of CF.

Understanding the implementation of interventions to improve the management of frailty in primary care: a rapid realist review

OBJECTIVE

Identifying and managing the needs of frail people in the community is an increasing priority for policy makers. We sought to identify factors that enable or constrain the implementation of interventions for frail older persons in primary care.

DESIGN

A rapid realist review.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and EMBASE, and grey literature. The search was conducted in September 2019 and rerun on 8 January 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We considered all types of empirical studies describing interventions targeting frailty in primary care.

ANALYSIS

We followed the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and publication criteria for our synthesis to systematically analyse and synthesise the existing literature and to identify (intervention-context-mechanism-outcome) configurations. We used normalisation processes theory to illuminate mechanisms surrounding implementation.

RESULTS

Our primary research returned 1755 articles, narrowed down to 29 relevant frailty intervention studies conducted in primary care. Our review identified two families of interventions. They comprised: (1) interventions aimed at the comprehensive assessment and management of frailty needs; and (2) interventions targeting specific frailty needs. Key factors that facilitate or inhibit the translation of frailty interventions into practice related to the distribution of resources; patient engagement and professional skill sets to address identified need.

CONCLUSION

There remain challenges to achieving successful implementation of frailty interventions in primary care. There were a key learning points under each family. First, targeted allocation of resources to address specific needs allows a greater alignment of skill sets and reduces overassessment of frail individuals. Second, earlier patient involvement may also improve intervention implementation and adherence.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

The published protocol for the review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019161193).

Identification and management of frail patients in English primary care: an analysis of the General Medical Services 2018/2019 contract dataset

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the extent of implementation of the General Medical Services 2018/2019 'frailty identification and management' contract in general practitioner (GP) practices in England, and link implementation outcomes to a range of practice and Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) factors.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design using publicly available datasets relating to the year 2018 for all GP practices in England.

SETTINGS

English general practices.

DATA

The analysis was conducted across 6632 practices in 193 CCGs with 9 995 558 patients aged 65 years or older.

OUTCOMES

Frailty assessment rates, frailty coding rates and frailty prevalence rates, plus rates of medication reviews, falls assessments and enriched Summary Care Records (SCRs).

ANALYSIS

Summary statistics were calculated and multilevel negative binomial regression analysis was used to investigate relationships of the six outcomes with explanatory factors.

RESULTS

14.3% of people aged 65 years or older were assessed for frailty, with 35.4% of these-totalling 5% of the eligible population-coded moderately or severely frail. 59.2% received a medications review, but rates of falls assessments (3.7%) and enriched SCRs (21%) were low. However, percentages varied widely across practices and CCGs. Practice differences in contract implementation were most strongly accounted for by their grouping within CCGs, with weaker but still important associations with some practice and CCG factors, particularly healthcare demand-related factors of chronic caseload and (negatively) % of patients aged 65 years or older.

CONCLUSION

CCG appears the strongest determinant of practice engagement with the frailty contract, and fuller implementation may depend on greater engagement of CCGs themselves, particularly in commissioning suitable interventions. Practices understandably targeted frailty assessments at patients more likely to be found severely frail, resulting in probable underidentification of moderately frail individuals who might benefit most from early interventions. Frailty prevalence estimates based on the contract data may not reflect actual rates.

Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners

Background

Well-established electronic data capture in UK general practice means that algorithms, developed on patient data, can be used for automated clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). These can predict patient risk, help with prescribing safety, improve diagnosis and prompt clinicians to record extra data. However, there is persistent evidence of low uptake of CDSSs in the clinic. We interviewed UK General Practitioners (GPs) to understand what features of CDSSs, and the contexts of their use, facilitate or present barriers to their use.

Methods

We interviewed 11 practicing GPs in London and South England using a semi-structured interview schedule and discussed a hypothetical CDSS that could detect early signs of dementia. We applied thematic analysis to the anonymised interview transcripts.

Results

We identified three overarching themes: trust in individual CDSSs; usability of individual CDSSs; and usability of CDSSs in the broader practice context, to which nine subthemes contributed. Trust was affected by CDSS provenance, perceived threat to autonomy and clear management guidance. Usability was influenced by sensitivity to the patient context, CDSS flexibility, ease of control, and non-intrusiveness. CDSSs were more likely to be used by GPs if they did not contribute to alert proliferation and subsequent fatigue, or if GPs were provided with training in their use.

Conclusions

Building on these findings we make a number of recommendations for CDSS developers to consider when bringing a new CDSS into GP patient records systems. These include co-producing CDSS with GPs to improve fit within clinic workflow and wider practice systems, ensuring a high level of accuracy and a clear clinical pathway, and providing CDSS training for practice staff. These recommendations may reduce the proliferation of unhelpful alerts that can result in important decision-support being ignored.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01557-z.

Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study

Background

In England, GPs are independent contractors working to a national contract. Since 2017, the contract requires GPs to use electronic tools to proactively identify moderate and severe frailty in people aged ≥65 years, and offer interventions to help those identified to stay well and maintain independent living. Little is currently known about GPs’ views of this contractual requirement.

Aim

To explore GPs’ views of identifying frailty and offering interventions for those living with moderate or severe frailty.

Design and setting

A sequential mixed-methods study of GPs in the East Midlands region of England — namely Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, and Northamptonshire — undertaken between January and May 2019.

Method

GPs were made aware of the study via professional organisations’ newsletters and bulletins, GP email lists, and social media, and were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and, based on those survey responses, GPs with a range of GP and practice characteristics, as well as views on identifying frailty, were selected to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interview transcripts were analysed using framework analysis.

Results

In total, 188 out of 3058 (6.1%) GPs responded to the survey and 18 GPs were interviewed. GPs were broadly supportive of identifying frailty, but felt risk-stratification tools lacked sensitivity and specificity, and wanted evidence showing clinical benefit. Frailty identification increased workload and was under-resourced, with limited time for, and access to, necessary interventions. GPs felt they lacked knowledge about frailty and more education was required to better understand it.

Conclusion

Proactively identifying and responding to frailty in primary care requires GP education, highly sensitive and specific risk-stratification tools, better access to interventions to lessen the impact of frailty, and adequate resourcing to achieve potential clinical impact.