Clinical Outcome in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation With Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Locally Advanced Esophageal and Junctional Cancer

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy that carries a high mortality rate. The treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer requires a multimodal approach involving chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical resection. Optimal treatment combinations and sequences for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) versus adenocarcinoma (AC) histological subtypes are still being determined. For very early stage esophageal cancers, endoscopic therapies or surgical resection without chemotherapy and radiation are preferred. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection has been the standard in locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer based on the landmark CROSS trial. Definitive chemoradiation is recommended for patients who are not surgical candidates or decline surgery. Perioperative chemotherapy without radiation can be considered for lower esophageal AC and gastroesophageal (GE)-junction AC based on landmark MAGIC and FLOT4 trials. Additional trials are underway to compare preoperative chemoradiation to perioperative chemotherapy in esophageal and GE-junction ACs. Thus far, targeted therapies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have not been successful in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting. The roll of immunotherapy in perioperative/adjuvant setting is promising. Based on the CheckMate 577 trial, adjuvant nivolumab should be considered for all patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and R0 resection with residual pathologic disease. Additional trials involving various immunotherapy agents are underway.

Efficacy of early PET-CT directed switch to carboplatin and paclitaxel based definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer who have a poor early response to induction cisplatin and capecitabine in the UK: a multi-centre randomised controlled phase II trial

Background

The utility of early metabolic response assessment to guide selection of the systemic component of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for oesophageal cancer is uncertain.

Methods

In this multi-centre, randomised, open-label, phase II substudy of the radiotherapy dose-escalation SCOPE2 trial we evaluated the role of ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) at day 14 of cycle 1 of three-weekly induction cis/cap (cisplatin (60 mg/m²)/capecitabine (625 mg/m² days 1-21)) in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or adenocarcinoma (OAC). Non-responders, who had a less than 35% reduction in maximum standardised uptake value (SUV_max) from pre-treatment baseline, were randomly assigned to continue cis/cap or switch to car/pac (carboplatin AUC 5/paclitaxel 175 mg/m²) for a further induction cycle, then concurrently with radiotherapy over 25 fractions. Responders continued cis/cap for the duration of treatment. All patients (including responders) were randomised to standard (50Gy) or high (60Gy) dose radiation as part of the main study. Primary endpoint for the substudy was treatment failure-free survival (TFFS) at week 24. The trial was registered with International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number 97125464 and ClinicalTrials.govNCT02741856.

Findings

This substudy was closed on 1st August 2021 by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee on the grounds of futility and possible harm. To this point from 22nd November 2016, 103 patients from 16 UK centres had participated in the PET-CT substudy; 63 (61.2%; 52/83 OSCC, 11/20 OAC) of whom were non-responders. Of these, 31 were randomised to car/pac and 32 to remain on cis/cap. All patients were followed up until at least 24 weeks, at which point in OSCC both TFFS (25/27 (92.6%) vs 17/25 (68%); p = 0.028) and overall survival (42.5 vs. 20.4 months, adjusted HR 0.36; p = 0.018) favoured cis/cap over car/pac. There was a trend towards worse survival in OSCC + OAC cis/cap responders (33.6 months; 95%CI 23.1-nr) vs. non-responders (42.5 (95%CI 27.0-nr) months; HR = 1.43; 95%CI 0.67-3.08; p = 0.35).

Interpretation

In OSCC, early metabolic response assessment is not prognostic for TFFS or overall survival and should not be used to personalise systemic therapy in patients receiving dCRT.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.

Toxicity profile of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors and thoracic radiotherapy in esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Therapies based on the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) are transforming the treatment landscape of esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, the available data on adverse events (AEs) mainly stemmed from several prospective clinical trials and retrospective studies, in which, AE data are often handled and reported with less rigor than the primary beneficial outcomes of the study. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the toxicity spectrum of these novel regimens.

Method

We searched for all prospective clinical trials investigating the role of ICIs combined with TRT published between January 2010 and August 2022. Study articles and conference proceedings involving esophageal cancers and reporting the overall incidence or details of treatment-related AEs (trAEs) were synthesized to determine the toxicity profile of combination treatment. We compared trAEs between cancer type, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, and between sequential and concurrent administration of ICIs and TRT to identify potentially high-risk patients.

Results

We obtained toxicity data from 14 clinical trials involving 863 patients. The pooled overall incidence was 88.97% for any-grade trAEs and 18.48% for high-grade trAEs. The three most frequent non-hematologic any-grade trAEs were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP, 63.80%), esophagitis (51.54%), and fatigue (33.63%). Meanwhile, RCCEP (15.69%) was the most common non-hematologic high-grade trAE, followed by nausea (4.91%) and anorexia (3.81%). The occurrence rates of any-grade and high-grade pneumonitis were 10.82% and 0.66%, respectively. In subgroup analysis, the toxicity profiles of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors were mostly similar, except for any-grade pneumonitis (15.20% vs 4.88%, p=0.03) and high-grade leukopenia (6.25% vs 59.09%, p=0.00). In addition, concurrent treatment seemed to have a higher incidence of any-grade trAEs (95.20% vs 70.85%, p=0.03) compared with sequential treatment. ESCC seems to have higher incidence of any-grade hypothyroidism (22.55% vs 8.96%, p=0.049) compared to EAC.

Conclusion

Our study is the first systematic review to provide a toxicity profile of trAEs in esophageal cancer patients who received ICIs combined with TRT. Most AEs of this combination treatment are tolerable, although the incidence of any-grade trAEs was higher in the concurrent group. The difference in any-grade pneumonitis between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor groups needs further validation in a large clinical trial.

Oral metronomic chemotherapy after definitive chemoradiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Improving outcomes in locally advanced esophageal/GEJ squamous cell cancer (SCC) is an unmet need. We investigated the addition of oral metronomic chemotherapy (OMC) following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a randomized open-label integrated phase II/III study in patients with SCC of esophagus/GEJ following definitive CRT who had no radiologic evidence of progression, and no endoscopically detected disease. Randomization was 1:1 to OMC (celecoxib 200 mg twice daily and methotrexate 15 mg/m² weekly) for 12 months or observation. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. P ≤ 0.2 for PFS was required to proceed to phase III.

RESULTS

Between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019, we enrolled 151 patients for the phase II portion, 75 to OMC and 76 to observation. The tumor originated in the upper thoracic esophagus in 79% patients. Concurrent CRT consisted of median 63 Gy in a median of 35 fractions; concurrent chemotherapy was weekly paclitaxel + carboplatin in 91%. OMC was started at a median of 2.6 months (IQR 2.3-2.8) from CRT completion. Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in 18 patients (24%) in the OMC arm and 9 (12%) in the observation arm; P = 0.071. Median PFS was 25 months (95% CI, 17-58) in the OMC arm and was not attained [NA] (95% CI, 25-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.51, 95% CI, 1-2; P = 0.073. Median OS was 36 months (95% CI, 23-NA) in the OMC arm, and not attained (95% CI, NA-NA) in the observation arm; HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-2.9; P = 0.023.

CONCLUSION

Oral metronomic methotrexate and celecoxib in patients who have not progressed radiologically and have no endoscopic evidence of disease following radical CRT for locally advanced esophageal/GEJ SCC does not improve outcomes and may lower survival. [Funded by the TMC-Research Administration Council (TRAC); CHROME study (CHemoRadiotherapy followed by Oral Metronomic therapy in Esophageal cancer); ctri.nic.in number: CTRI/2015/09/006204].

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CTRI/2015/09/006204.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Taxanes Plus Platinum and Fluorouracil Plus Platinum in the First-Line Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) and taxanes plus platinum (TP) are standard treatments for esophageal cancer (EC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to explore the difference in the therapeutic effect and toxicity of FP and TP regimens in EC patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were fully searched and analyzed to find relevant articles on EC patients treated with FP and TP regimens up to 22 March 2022. Thirty-one studies, with a total of 3432 participants, were included in this review. The primary outcomes showed that the prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of TP groups were better than those of FP groups for the EC patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy treatment (3-year OS: RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08−1.44, p = 0.003; 3-year PFS: RR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17−1.75, p = 0.0006; ORR: RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06−1.29, p = 0.001). However, TP therapy was significantly correlated with a higher incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (p < 0.05). In the preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group, these two groups had a similar survival time (p > 0.05). The FP regimen corresponded to a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, while the TP regimen was associated with an increased incidence of febrile leukopenia (p < 0.05). Therefore, TP regimens could generate both superior clinical response and survival benefits when compared with FP regimens in EC patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Chemoradiation with Weekly Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study

Objective Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) using paclitaxel and carboplatin has significantly improved the survival rates in carcinoma esophagus, especially in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This regimen has not been adequately explored prospectively as a definitive CRT strategy. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and compliance to this regimen in a prospective setting in locally advanced esophageal SCC.

Materials and Methods Patients with locally advanced esophageal SCC were planned for definitive CRT by using weekly paclitaxel 50 mg/m ² and carboplatin area under curve 2 along with radical radiotherapy to a dose of 50.4 to 54 Gy. Treatment-related toxicity was assessed by using the common terminology criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0, and the response was assessed by using endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) 4 to 6 weeks following CRT. The pathological response was documented for those who underwent surgery.

Results Fifteen patients were included in the study, and all patients completed the planned course of radiation. The median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. In total, 66% of the patients had delay or interruptions in chemotherapy, mostly due to neutropenia, and 66% of the patients had a clinical complete response (CR). Four patients underwent definitive esophagectomy, and the histopathology revealed pathologic CR. Overall CR rate was 80%. The median overall survival was 14 months, and 1-year survival was 57%.

Conclusion Definitive CRT in esophageal SCC using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin was relatively well tolerated with manageable toxicities and good clinical response rates. It may potentially represent a new standard of care as definitive therapy in the management of these tumors.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Cisplatin with 5-fluouracil (Cis/5Fu) and paclitaxel with carboplatin (Pac/Car) are common regimens used in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC). Here, we aimed to compare the survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicities between these regimens in neoadjuvant CCRT in patients with locally advanced EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six patients with locally advanced EC (98% squamous cell carcinoma) were prospectively recruited between 2016 and 2017 in a non-randomized manner. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic agents administered (Pac/Car group, n=87; Cis/5Fu group, n=47) in CCRT to compare the survival outcome and severe adverse event (sAE) incidence.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (85.7%) and 80 patients (91.4%) in the Cis/5Fu and Pac/Car groups completed pre-planned CCRT (p=0.26), respectively. The Cis/5Fu group presented a higher incidence of non-hematological sAE than the Pac/Car group (69.45% vs. 51.7%, p=0.049). Patients in the Pac/Car group showed a higher rate of surgical resection than those in the Cis/5Fu group (49.4% vs. 22.4%, p<0.001). After a median follow-up duration of 22.0 months (range=1.9-31.8), the 2-year survival rate was 56.9% for patients in the Pac/Car group and 28.7% for the Cis/5Fu group. The hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival was 0.45 (95%CI=0.28-0.72, p=0.001) in the comparison between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Overall, neoadjuvant CCRT with Pac/Car is associated with a better survival outcome, higher surgical resection rate, and better safety profiles than Cis/5Fu in patients with locally advanced EC.

A Canadian single institution real-world experience using the CROSS trial regimen in the treatment of Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Trimodality therapy using the CROSS trial protocol is an accepted standard of care for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. For medically inoperable patients, chemoradiation (CRT) has been a therapeutic option. This single institution review aimed to assess the real-world application of the CROSS trial protocol.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 83 patients who underwent CRT with carboplatin and paclitaxel with trimodality or definitive intent between June 2012 and June 2018. 65 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT (NCRT); 40 had surgery. 18 had definitive CRT (DCRT). Patients' demographics, clinical, pathological, treatment and surgical characteristics were assessed. The data was analyzed in exploratory analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

For the 83 patients, the following median values were seen: RT dose 50.4 Gy, chemotherapy doses 5, time from CRT to surgery 62 days. 23% NCRT and 72% DCRT patients were ≥ 75 yrs and 49%, and 33% of these respectively had no interruptions to CRT. Patients ≥75 yrs were more likely to have DCRT (p = 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery were younger (p = 0.04). For NCRT and surgery, NCRT only, and DCRT respectively, median overall survival was 35.5, 12.1 and 17.1 months (log rank p=0.008); progression free survival was 32.2, 10 and 9.6 months (log rank p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite broadening of the CROSS trial eligibility criteria in our real-world data, there appears to be a survival benefit with trimodality therapy. The use of carboplatin and paclitaxel in DCRT may be of value and requires further study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Liposome-paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of liposome-paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients treated with liposome-paclitaxel based concurrent chemoradiotherapy between January 2015 and December 2019 at Cancer hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang cancer hospital) were enrolled in this study. The overall response, toxicities, progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed with SPSS software.

RESULTS

A total of 302 cycles of weekly chemotherapy were delivered, with a median 4 courses. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), the efficacy was classified as CR in 4 cases (5.1%), PR in 22 cases (28.2%) and SD in 51 cases (65.4%). The median PFS and OS time were 18.2 months and 23.4 months. The 3-year PFS and OS rates were 45.1% and 43.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Liposome-paclitaxel and carboplatin concurrent with radiotherapy is a safe and effective modality for locally advanced ESCC. Further clinical investigation are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.

Preoperative Serum Sodium Level as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker for Adjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Low serum sodium has been associated with unfavorable outcome in several cancers. The prognostic value of serum sodium in esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate preoperative serum sodium in association with outcome and survival benefit of adjuvant therapy for patients with EC.

METHODS

Preoperative serum sodium and clinicopathological indexes were retrospectively analyzed in 2155 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Sichuan cancer hospital. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Benefit of adjuvant therapy was estimated by using Propensity Score Matching.

RESULTS

The incidence of hyponatremia and hypernatremia were 2% (43/2155) and 3.5% (76/2155) in treatment-naive patients. Both sodium disorders indicated unfavorable OS (hyponatremia, adjusted HR[95% CI] = 1.78[1.2-2.62]; hypernatremia, adjusted HR = 1.52[1.1-2.11]) and DFS (hyponatremia, adjusted HR[95% CI] = 1.52[1.03-2.23]; hypernatremia, adjusted HR = 1.45[1.06-1.99]). Decreased sodium concentrations within the normal range were associated with poor OS and DFS. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was associated with improved three-year OS (56.6 vs. 40%; adjusted HR = 0.55 [95% CI, 0.41-0.73]) and DFS (51.9 vs. 36.2%; adjusted HR = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.48-0.83]) versus surgery alone in patients with low serum sodium (Na < 139.6 mmol/liter), but not in other sodium subgroups. Meanwhile, serum sodium was inversely correlated with cell counts of leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes and C-reactive protein levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that low preoperative serum sodium is associated with poor outcome in EC patients, and may predict survival benefit of adjuvant therapy.

Single-Agent Versus Double-Agent Chemotherapy in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

LESSONS LEARNED

The efficacy of single-agent chemotherapy was not significantly different from that of double-agent chemotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy had lower gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity. Overall survival and progression-free survival were not significantly different between single- and double-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND

This multicenter, randomized, phase II trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy using the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 with those of double-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy using S-1 and cisplatin in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (clinical stages I to III) were randomly allocated to the single-agent group (S-1) or the double-agent group (S-1/cisplatin). The concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan was similar for both groups: planning target volume 1.8 Gy/f*30-33f and planning gross target volume of 2 Gy/f*30-33f. The primary outcome measure was the endoscopic complete response rate.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients randomized, 89 were assessable. The endoscopic complete response rate was 46.9% (23/49) in the single-agent group and 52.5% (21/40) in double-agent group. The median progression-free survival within a median follow-up of 23 months was 20 and 21 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 26 months and not reached, respectively. Grade 3 hematological toxicities occurred in 4.1% and 27.5% of the patients in the single- and the double-agent group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent chemotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has good efficacy and safety, thus warranting a phase III trial.

Outcome of Weekly Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-based Definitive Chemoradiation in Oesophageal Cancer in Patients Not Considered to be Suitable for Platinum-Fluoropyrimidine-based Treatment: A Multicentre, Retrospective Review

AIMS

Although cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine-based definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is a standard of care for oesophageal cancer, toxicity is significant and limits its use in elderly and frail patients. Weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-based dCRT provides a viable alternative, although prospective data are lacking in the dCRT setting. Here we report the results of a national, multicentre retrospective review of outcome in patients treated with weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-based dCRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study of nine radiotherapy centres across the UK we evaluated the outcome of patients who had non-metastatic, histologically confirmed carcinoma of the oesophagus (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell or undifferentiated; World Health Organization performance status 0-2; stage I-III disease) and had been selected to receive weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-based dCRT as they were considered not suitable for cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine-based dCRT. dCRT consisted of carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29) and the recommended radiation dose was 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions. We assessed overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS; overall, local and distant), proportion of patients who were failure free at the response assessment (12 weeks after dCRT), treatment compliance and toxicity.

RESULTS

In total, 214 patients from nine UK centres were treated between 15 February 2013 and 19 March 2019: 39.7% of patients were ≥75 years; 18.7% ≥ 80 years. Indications for weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-based dCRT were comorbidities (47.2%), clinician choice (36.4%) and poor tolerance/progression on cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine induction chemotherapy (15.8%). The median overall survival was 24.28 months (95% confidence interval 20.07-30.09) and the median PFS was 16.33 months (95% confidence interval 14.29-20.96). Following treatment, 69.1% (96/139) had a combined complete response on endoscopy with non-progression (complete response/partial response/stable disease) on imaging. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates for this patient group were 81.9% (95% confidence interval 75.6-86.8%) and 50.6% (95% confidence interval 40.5-60.0%), respectively. Thirty-three per cent (n = 70) of patients experienced at least one grade 3 + acute toxicity (grade 3/4 haematological: 10%; grade 3/4 non-haematological: 32%) and there were no treatment-related deaths. 86.9% of patients completed at least four cycles of concomitant weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and planned radiotherapy was completed in 97.7% (209/214).

CONCLUSION

Weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-based CRT seems to be well tolerated in elderly patients and in those with comorbidities, where cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine-based dCRT is contraindicated. Survival outcomes are comparable with cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine-based dCRT.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with raltitrexed and nedaplatin regimen for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of raltitrexed and nedaplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Eligible patients were adults with newly diagnosed untreated, unresectable esophageal cancer in stages I to IV with lymph node metastases or cervical esophageal cancer. Patients received nedaplatin 25 mg/m per day on day 1-3, raltitrexed 3 mg/m on days 1 repeated every 21 days for 2 cycles, and combined concurrent radiotherapy (2 Gy/fraction, total dose of 60 Gy).

RESULT

Thirty patients were included with squamous cell carcinoma. The median follow-up duration was 24 months. The overall response rate was 90%. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates for all patients were 70.4% and 55.7% with a median survival time of 30 months, and the median progression free survival was 20 month. The major toxicities were leukopenia and thrombopenia, with grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and thrombopenia were 50% and 30% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with raltitrexed and nedaplatin agents frequently caused myelosuppression but was highly active and suggested to be a promising treatment option for locally advanced ESCC.

A multicenter open-label phase II trial to evaluate nivolumab and ipilimumab for 2nd line therapy in elderly patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (RAMONA)

Background

Advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is frequently diagnosed in elderly patients. The impact of 2nd line chemotherapy is poorly defined. Recent data demonstrated effectiveness of checkpoint inhibitors in different squamous cell carcinomas. Therefore, we assess combined nivolumab/ipilimumab as 2nd line therapy in elderly ESCC patients.

Methods

RAMONA is a multicenter open-label phase II trial. The primary objective is to demonstrate a significant survival benefit of nivolumab/ipilimumab in advanced ESCC compared to historical data of standard chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is therefore overall survival (OS). Major secondary objective is the evaluation of tolerability. Time to QoL deterioration will thus be determined as key secondary endpoint. Further secondary endpoints are tumor response, PFS and safety. We aim to recruit a total of n = 75 subjects that have to be > 65 years old. Eligibility is determined by the geriatric status (G8 screening and Deficit Accumulation Frailty Index (DAFI)). A safety assessment will be performed after a 3 cycle run-in phase of nivolumab (240 mg Q2W) to justify escalation for eligible patients to combined nivolumab (240 mg Q2W) and ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q6W), while the other patients will remain on nivolumab only. RAMONA also includes translational research sub-studies to identify predictive biomarkers, including PD-1 and PD-L1 evaluation at different time points, establishment of organoid cultures and microbiome analyses for response prediction.

Discussion

The RAMONA trial aims to implement checkpoint inhibitors for elderly patients with advanced ESCC as second line therapy. Novel biomarkers for checkpoint-inhibitor response are analyzed in extensive translational sub-studies.

Trial registration

EudraCT Number: 2017–002056-86; NCT03416244, registered: 31.1.2018.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5446-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparison of definite chemoradiation therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/5-fluoruracil in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Background

While neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) with subsequent surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced or node-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCC) suitable for surgery, patients who are unsuitable for surgery or who refuse surgery should be treated with definite chemoradiation therapy (dCRT). Purpose of this study was to compare toxicity and oncologic outcome of dCRT with either cisplatin and 5-fluoruracil (CDDP/5FU) or carboplatin and paclitaxel (Carb/TAX) in patients with SCC.

Methods

Twenty-two patients who received dCRT with carboplatin (AUC2, weekly) and paclitaxel (50 mg per square meter of body-surface area, weekly) were retrospectively compared to 25 patients who were scheduled for dCRT with cisplatin (20 mg/m²/d) and 5-fluoruracil (500 mg/m²/d) on day 1–5 and day 29–33. For the per-protocol (PP) analysis, PP treatment was defined as complete radiation therapy with at least 54Gy and at least three complete cycles of Carb/TAX or complete radiation therapy with at least 54Gy and at least one complete cycle of CDDP/5FU. While patients who were scheduled for dCRT with Carb/TAX received a significantly higher total radiation dose (median dose 59.4Gy vs. 54Gy, p < 0.001) than patients who were scheduled for dCRT with CDDP/5FU, no significant differences were seen for other parameters (age, sex, TNM-stage, grading and tumor extension).

Results

Forty-seven patients (25 patients treated with CDDP/5FU and 22 patients treated with Carb/TAX) were evaluated for the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 41 of 47 patients (23 patients treated with CDDP/5FU and 18 patients treated with Carb/TAX) were evaluated for the PP analysis. Severe myelotoxicity (≥ III°) was seen in 52% (CDDP/5FU) and 55% of patients (Carb/TAX), respectively (p = 1.000). In the univariate binary logistic regression analysis, patients age was the only factor associated with an increased risk of ≥ III° myelotoxicity (hazard ratio 1.145, 95% CI 1.035; 1.266; p = 0.009). Regarding treatment efficiency, no significant differences were seen for overall survival (OS) and freedom from relapse (FFR) between both treatment groups.

Conclusion

Myelotoxicity and oncologic outcome under dCRT were not different for patients with SCC of the esophagus treated with either CDDP/5FU or Carb/TAX. The putative equivalence of dCRT with Carb/TAX in this setting should be further investigated in prospective trials. However, our data reveal that the risk of significant myelotoxicity increases with patient age and therefore other chemotherapy regimens might be evaluated in elderly patients.

Definite intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy more than 4 cycles improved survival for patients with locally-advanced or inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

We investigated which prognostic factor could improve survival for esophageal cancer patients who received definite concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Eighty patients with age ≥18, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥ 60, and clinical stage T1-4N0-3M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled from July 2004 to December 2015. They underwent definite intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without simultaneous integrated boost to the primary tumor, and reception of concurrent chemotherapy ≥ 1 cycle. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). The median follow-up duration for alive patients was 21.5 months. The rates of 2-, 3- and 5-year OS/LRPFS/DMFS were 23.8%/53.5%/49.3%, 19.1%/44.6%/49.3%, and 13.0%/44.6%/43.9%, respectively. Only the non-clinical complete response (non-cCR) after CCRT was an independent poor prognostic factor in OS (HR 3.101, 95% CI 1.535-6.265, p = 0.0016). Radiation dose >50.4 Gy and chemotherapy ≥4 cycles significantly predicted better LRPFS (p = 0.0361 and 0.0163, respectively). Poorly differentiated tumor and stage III disease have poor DMFS (p = 0.0336 and 0.0411, respectively), and chemotherapy ≥ 4 cycles was a better predictor (p = 0.0004). In subgroup analysis, patients who received radiation dose ≤50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy ≥4 cycles had the best survival outcome with 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 73.7%, 39.4%, 31.5% and 17.5%, respectively. In conclusion, definite radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy ≥4 cycles improved the survival for patients with inoperable or locally-advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical outcomes of definitive chemoradiotherapy using carboplatin and paclitaxel in esophageal cancer

Patients with nonmetastatic esophageal cancer not suitable for surgery can be treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of definitive chemoradiotherapy using carboplatin and paclitaxel. Medical records were reviewed of patients treated for nonmetastatic squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus between January 2009 and December 2013 in two collaborating institutes. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy (28 fractions of 1.8 Gy) and 6 weekly courses of carboplatin (AUC = 2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2). Data on survival, progression, toxicity, and effect on dysphagia were recorded. Sixty-six patients were included. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months (95% CI 4.7-21.5 months) and a 2-year OS was 30% (95% CI 18%-42%). At 2 years, 26% of patients developed local progression (95% CI 15%-37%) and 49% developed distant metastases (95% CI 36%-64%). Acute toxicity grade ≥3 was observed in 47% of patients. Late adverse events grade ≥3 were seen in 20%, mostly esophageal stenoses. Of patients with available data 3 months after treatment, 70% had relief of dysphagia. Definitive chemoradiotherapy led to a median OS of 13 months. Toxicity was common, mostly due to hematological toxicity. Given the relatively short median survival, an adequate selection of patients for this intensive treatment is required.

SEOM Clinical Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer (2016)

Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive tumor that represents the 6th most common cause of cancer death worldwide. The estimated incidence in Spain is 2090 cases/year. Two main pathological subtypes exist, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The main differences between them are localization and underlying factors which are the principal cause of the recent incidence changes observed in west countries. Staging techniques and treatment options which combine surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, reflected the high complexity of the EC management. An undeniably multidisciplinary approach is, therefore, required. In this guide, we review the status of current diagnosis and treatment, define evidence and propose recommendations.