1
|
Lewis A, Nagrial A. Systematic Review of Single-Agent vs. Multi-Agent Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Elderly vs. Younger Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082289. [PMID: 37190218 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review all studies comparing multi-agent to single-agent chemotherapy in the first and second-line setting for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, so as to compare the outcomes of young and elderly patients. METHODS This review searched three databases for relevant studies. The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, comparison of an elderly versus young population, comparison of single-agent versus multi-agent chemotherapy, data on survival outcomes, and randomised controlled trials. The exclusion criteria were phase I trials, incomplete studies, retrospective analyses, systematic reviews, and case reports. A meta-analysis was performed on second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients. RESULTS Six articles were included in this systematic review. Three of these studies explored first-line treatment and three explored second-line treatment. In the subgroup analysis, the meta-analysis showed statistically improved overall survival for elderly patients receiving single-agent second-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review confirmed that combination chemotherapy improved survival in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, regardless of age. The benefit of combination chemotherapy in second-line studies for elderly patients with advanced pancreas cancer was less clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Lewis
- School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kung H, Yu J. Targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Mechanisms and clinical study. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e216. [PMID: 36814688 PMCID: PMC9939368 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng‐Chung Kung
- Krieger School of Arts and SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jun Yu
- Departments of Medicine and OncologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Brien TN, Shahrokni A, Horgan AM. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for rectal cancer: Totally Not Translatable to the older patient? J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101348. [PMID: 35882578 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy N O'Brien
- Medical Oncology Dept., University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Waterford, Ireland.
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Dept. of Medicine/Geriatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Anne M Horgan
- Medical Oncology Dept., University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Waterford, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kobayashi S, Ueno M, Ishii H, Furuse J. Management of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:959-965. [PMID: 35789391 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Systemic chemotherapy plays important role in pancreatic cancer not only for palliative treatment of unresectable disease, but also for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of resectable disease. Most clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy have been conducted in non-elderly patients, and the results cannot always be extrapolated to elderly patients because of the uniqueness of this population. The number of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer has increased in an aging society; therefore, there is an urgent need to develop specific treatments for elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine or S-1 monotherapy is generally considered appropriate even for vulnerable elderly patients. FOLFIRINOX is considered inapplicable based on its safety profile. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil plus folinic acid can be administered to elderly patients, because the phase III trials have shown the efficacy and safety for patients including those who were 75 years or older. However, the feasibility of these therapies for elderly patients is still under debate since the number of elderly populations was relatively small in these studies. To determine the indication for these regimens in the elderly, the background of each patient should be considered. Geriatric assessment such as the Geriatric 8 and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index can identify vulnerabilities and are therefore recommended in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical studies of elderly patients. It is expected that geriatric assessment will elucidate the eligibility criteria for those regimens in elderly individuals. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing to establish a standard treatment in the vulnerable elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer, who cannot tolerate the same regimen as in the non-elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, Japan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ishii
- Clinical Research Center, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba City, Japan
| | - Junji Furuse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Daiku K, Ikezawa K, Morishima T, Kai Y, Takada R, Yamai T, Miyashiro I, Ohkawa K. Chemotherapy effectiveness and age-group analysis of older adult patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A Japanese cancer registry cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1208-1215. [PMID: 35931652 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although older adults aged ≥75 years comprise a substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC), the effectiveness of chemotherapy in older adults with PC remains to be established. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study examined the effectiveness of chemotherapy according to age in older adult patients with metastatic PC. We used a large database that combined three data sources (the hospital-based cancer registry database, Osaka Cancer Registry, and Japan's Diagnosis Procedure Combination) and extracted data from patients pathologically diagnosed with metastatic PC between 2013 and 2015 in 31 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify a cohort of patients with similar backgrounds. The effect of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS Compared with 687 younger patients (<75 years old), 276 older adult patients had significant impairments in activities of daily living and poorer prognoses (6.8 vs. 4.1 months, p < 0.001), with a lower frequency of chemotherapy (81.5% vs. 55.1%; p < 0.001). PSM of older adult patients showed that chemotherapy significantly contributed to a better prognosis (best supportive care, 2.6 months vs. chemotherapy, 5.8 months, p < 0.001). Age group analysis with PSM of five-year age ranges revealed that the median OS was significantly longer in the chemotherapy group among older adult patients aged <85 years. DISCUSSION Chemotherapy provides a survival benefit in older adult patients with metastatic PC, and patients aged <85 years could be promising candidates for chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuma Daiku
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Ikezawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
| | | | - Yugo Kai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryoji Takada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuo Yamai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Isao Miyashiro
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
André L, Antherieu G, Boinet A, Bret J, Gilbert T, Boulahssass R, Falandry C. Oncological Treatment-Related Fatigue in Oncogeriatrics: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102470. [PMID: 35626074 PMCID: PMC9139887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Fatigue in older patients has multiple etiologies, as this symptom may be cancer-related, treatment-related, age-related, or part of frailty syndrome. Physicians need to identify this symptom and understand its risk factors but also evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of cancer treatments considering the risk of impairing the patient’s quality of life. This scoping review was aimed to present the level of information currently available on any-grade fatigue and grade 3 or more fatigue for each cancer treatment regimen, either in general or in older populations, for the most prevalent tumors. Abstract Fatigue is a highly prevalent symptom in both cancer patients and the older population, and it contributes to quality-of-life impairment. Cancer treatment-related fatigue should thus be included in the risk/benefit assessment when introducing any treatment, but tools are lacking to a priori estimate such risk. This scoping review was designed to report the current evidence regarding the frequency of fatigue for the different treatment regimens proposed for the main cancer indications, with a specific focus on age-specific data, for the following tumors: breast, ovary, prostate, urothelium, colon, lung and lymphoma. Fatigue was most frequently reported using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) versions 3 to 5. A total of 324 regimens were analyzed; data on fatigue were available for 217 (67%) of them, and data specific to older patients were available for 35 (11%) of them; recent pivotal trials have generally reported more fatigue grades than older studies, illustrating increasing concern over time. This scoping review presents an easy-to-understand summary that is expected to provide helpful information for shared decisions with patients regarding the anticipation and prevention of fatigue during each cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise André
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Gabriel Antherieu
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Amélie Boinet
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Judith Bret
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
| | - Thomas Gilbert
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
- Research on Healthcare Professionals and Performance RESHAPE, Inserm U1290, Lyon 1 University, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Rabia Boulahssass
- Geriatric Coordination Unit for Geriatric Oncology (UCOG) PACA Est CHU de Nice, 06000 Nice, France;
- FHU OncoAge, 06000 Nice, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Nice Sofia Antilpolis, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Geriatrics Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69230 Saint Genis-Laval, France; (L.A.); (G.A.); (A.B.); (J.B.); (T.G.)
- FHU OncoAge, 06000 Nice, France
- CarMeN Laboratory, INSERM U.1060/Université Lyon1/INRA U. 1397/INSA Lyon/Hospices Civils Lyon, Bâtiment CENS-ELI 2D, Hôpital Lyon Sud Secteur 2, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
- UCOGIR—Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Ouest–Guyane, Hôpital Lyon Sud, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Maieutics Charles Mérieux, Lyon 1 University, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-478-863-287
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Treatment Patterns, Toxicity, and Outcomes of Older Adults With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving First-line Palliative Chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 45:55-60. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Barros AG, Pulido CF, Machado M, Brito MJ, Couto N, Sousa O, Melo SA, Mansinho H. Treatment optimization of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (Review). Int J Oncol 2021; 59:110. [PMID: 34859257 PMCID: PMC8651228 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignant tumor types, being the sixth leading cause of mortality worldwide and the fourth in Europe. Globally, it has a mortality/incidence ratio of 98%, and the 5‑year survival rate in Europe is only 3%. Although risk factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol consumption and genetic factors, have been identified, the causes of PDAC remain elusive. Additionally, the only curative treatment for PDAC is surgery with negative margins. However, upon diagnosis, ~30% of the patients already present with locally advanced disease. In these cases, a multidisciplinary approach is required to improve disease‑related symptoms and prolong patient survival. In the present article, a comprehensive review of PDAC epidemiology, physiology and treatment is provided. Moreover, guidelines on patient treatment are suggested. Among the different available therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced PDAC, results are modest, most likely due to the complexity of the disease, and so the prognostic remains poor. Molecular approaches based on multi‑omics research are promising and will contribute to groundbreaking personalized medicine. Thus, economic investment that promotes research of pancreatic cancer will be critical to the development of more efficient diagnostic and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela G. Barros
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Coimbra, 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Catarina F. Pulido
- Department of Medical Oncology, Luz Lisbon Hospital, 1500-650 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Manuela Machado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Entre o Douro e Vouga Hospital Center (CHEDV), 4520-211 Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
| | - Maria José Brito
- Pathologic Anatomy Department, Garcia de Orta Hospital, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| | - Nuno Couto
- Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research Centre, 1400-038 Lisbon, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Olga Sousa
- Radiotherapy Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, 4200-072 Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Sónia A. Melo
- i3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health of University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- IPATIMUP-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Hélder Mansinho
- Hemato-Oncology Department, Garcia de Orta Hospital, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kotronoulas G. Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities of Integrating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Geriatric Oncology to Advance Patient Screening for Functional Fitness for Treatment. Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151230. [PMID: 34758915 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To discuss potential benefits, challenges, and opportunities of integrating patient-reported outcome measures in geriatric oncology, with the goal being to advance patient screening for 'functional fitness for treatment.' DATA SOURCES This is narrative review of the relevant literature using PubMed. CONCLUSION Patient screening in geriatric cancer care can be driven by patient self-reports. Most of the research on patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care to date has involved, in different proportions and to different extents, older patients with cancer (≥70 years of age). However, reports specifically targeting implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in geriatric cancer care are surprisingly fewer. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology Priorities Initiative calls for more research into the use of patient-reported outcome measures for older adults with cancer. More feasibility studies will be required to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures as fit-for-purpose, reporting frequency, patient burden, integration and display of patient-reported information, and workflow impact. Developing, adapting, and validating patient-reported outcome measures for use in geriatric oncology will be key to ensure adequacy of measurement. Groundwork involving consultation of all potential end users of patient-reported information is paramount because there is no one size fits all. When the ground is ready for implementation adequate preparation, training, resources, and ongoing support will be needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Working within the multidisciplinary team, nurses can promote patient screening that is led by the patient. Nursing roles can be developed, supported, expanded, or repurposed to involve greater use of patient-reported outcome measures for several key patient outcomes in geriatric cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigorios Kotronoulas
- Nursing and Health Care, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Winer A, Dotan E. Treatment Paradigms for Older Adults with Pancreatic Cancer: a Nuanced Approach. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:104. [PMID: 34596801 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00892-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is increasing in incidence in the USA. This disease disproportionately affects older adults, and as the percentage of adults > 65 years old increases with the aging of the baby boomers, the prevalence is expected to rise over the coming decade. These patients are often more susceptible to disease-related symptoms and have less ability to withstand both cancer and treatment-related side effects. Therefore, it is imperative that treating physicians thoughtfully consider their recommended treatment approach towards this vulnerable patient population. This review focuses on the current state of research of older adults with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, highlighting deficiencies in the representation of this patient population in clinical trials. It is vital that the treating physicians take a nuanced approach towards therapy of localized and metastatic disease in geriatric patients. A one size fits all treatment algorithm is no longer appropriate in any cancer patient, let alone the elders who are particularly vulnerable to developing treatment-related toxicities. To help guide therapy decisions, it is important to perform a comprehensive geriatric assessment which may uncover unexpected frailty and lead to a change in the recommended treatment approach. In this way, we can support older adults during therapy for this aggressive malignancy and provide optimal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Winer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, 8081 Innovation Park Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22031, USA.
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Use of FOLFIRINOX or Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Single Institution Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194939. [PMID: 34638422 PMCID: PMC8508515 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the effect of treatment with FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Forty-eight percent of patients treated with FFN became eligible for radical resection, and twenty-two percent of patients receiving GemNab underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. FFN treatment was associated with a better overall survival, compared with GemNab (mOS 85.1 vs. 54.3 weeks, FFN and GemNab, respectively; HR = 0.54; p = 0.0109). We found different toxicity profiles between the two chemotherapy regimens. Future randomized clinical trials are mandatory to clarify the best treatment in patients with LA PDAC. Abstract Patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not present distant metastases but are not eligible for surgery upfront. Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in combination with loco-regional treatments are generally used in this setting. However, the best treatment choice is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the information of 225 patients with stage II–III PDAC treated at our institution between October 2011 and December 2020. A total of 94 patients with LA PDAC who are non-eligible for surgery upfront received neoadjuvant FFN or GemNab. Of the 67 patients receiving FFN, 28 (41.8%) underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 27 patients treated with GemNab, 6 (22.2%) became eligible for resection. The median overall survival (OS) was 85.1 weeks and 54.3 weeks in the FFN and GemNab groups, respectively (HR = 0.54, p = 0.0109). The median OS was 189.7 weeks and 76.4 weeks in the resected and unresected cohorts, respectively (HR = 0.25, p < 0.0001). Neutropenia (37.3%), anemia (6.0%), and diarrhea (6.0%) in the FFN group and neutropenia (22.2%) and thrombocytopenia (18.5%) in the GemNab groups were the most frequent grade 3–4 side effects. Higher rates of thrombocytosis (p < 0.0001) and peripheral edema (p < 0.0001) were observed in the GemNab group. Our results suggest that the use of FFN is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than GemNab for patients with LA PDAC. Future randomized and controlled clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of these regimens and loco-regional treatments in this setting.
Collapse
|
12
|
Colloca G. Performance status as prognostic factor in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy of unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A trial-level meta-analysis. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:232-239. [PMID: 34161667 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
For patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), there are no standardized prognostic and predictive factors beyond performance status (PS). A poor PS, as defined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 2 or more, has been related with a detrimental effect of chemotherapy. Therefore, even more trials enrolled patients with good PS. The current analysis aims to evaluate the results of PS as a prognostic factor in phase III trials of patients with mPDAC receiving first-line chemotherapy. A literature search on two databases, from 2000 to 2019, and a further selection of clinical trials were performed by predefined criteria. Twelve phase III studies have been included in the analysis: the trials, enrolling 5619 patients, confirmed the worse prognosis of patients with higher ECOG PS scores (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.74; p-value < 0.001), and a similar trend was evident for patients with an ECOG PS 1 versus 0 (HR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.43-1.80; p-value < 0.001) in six studies, enrolling 2799 patients. Heterogeneity of trials was high, with I2 = 91%. Some possible moderators have been suggested, such as the number of drugs in the chemotherapy regimen and the male gender. In conclusion, a low ECOG PS score appears to be related with a longer survival even in trials that excluded patients with an ECOG PS 2 score, but the meta-analyses reported high heterogeneity and publication bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Colloca
- Department of Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Sanremo, Sanremo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Macchini M, Chiaravalli M, Pircher C, Zanon S, Peretti U, Mazza E, Valente MM, Fugazza C, Gianni L, Reni M. Multidrug regimens for treatment of older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:117-121. [PMID: 32631650 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Older patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPDAC) are under-represented in clinical trials. METHODS Our single-center, retrospective study enrolled MPDAC patients ≥ 70 treated with chemotherapy RESULTS: 105 patients were divided in groups based on the received treatments: 44 gemcitabine or capecitabine monotherapy (A), 34 nabpaclitaxel-gemcitabine (B) 27 4-drugs combinations (gemcitabine, cisplatin, capecitabine plus either nab-paclitaxel or epirubicin or docetaxel) (C). Group A: median age was 78 (70-87) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 was found in 84% of patients; Group B: median age 77 (71-84) and KPS ≥ 80 in 88% of patients; Group C: median age 73 (70-78) and KPS ≥ 80 in 93% of patients. Median OS was 7.9, 11.7 and 14.2 months in group A, B and C respectively; 1 and 2-year OS were 27% and 8% in group A; 44% and 5% in group B; 52% and 22% in group C. When lung metastatic only patients were excluded, patients <75 and ≥ 75 had similar OS in group A (6.4 vs 5.6 months) and in group B (12.3 vs 11.1 months). In group B grade 3 thrombocytopenia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent in patients ≥ 75. CONCLUSIONS In older patients, combination chemotherapy shows acceptable feasibility and promising efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Macchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Marta Chiaravalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Chiara Pircher
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Silvia Zanon
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Umberto Peretti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Elena Mazza
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Maria Maddalena Valente
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Clara Fugazza
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Luca Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brada LJH, Walma MS, van Dam RM, de Vos-Geelen J, de Hingh IH, Creemers GJ, Liem MS, Mekenkamp LJ, de Meijer VE, de Groot DJA, Patijn GA, de Groot JWB, Festen S, Kerver ED, Stommel MWJ, Meijerink MR, Bosscha K, Pruijt JF, Polée MB, Ropela JA, Cirkel GA, Los M, Wilmink JW, Haj Mohammad N, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ. The treatment and survival of elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry. Pancreatology 2021; 21:163-169. [PMID: 33309624 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment options for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) have improved in recent years and consequently survival has increased. It is unknown, however, if elderly patients benefit from these improvements in therapy. With the ongoing aging of the patient population and an increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, this patient group becomes more relevant. This study aims to clarify the association between increasing age, treatment and overall survival in patients with LAPC. METHODS Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry including consecutive patients with LAPC, who were registered in 14 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (April 2015-December 2017). Patients were divided in three groups according to age (<65, 65-74 and ≥75 years). Primary outcome was overall survival stratified by primary treatment strategy. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for possible confounders. RESULTS Overall, 422 patients with LAPC were included; 162 patients (38%) aged <65 years, 182 patients (43%) aged 65-74 and 78 patients (19%) aged ≥75 years. Chemotherapy was administered in 86%, 81% and 50% of the patients in the different age groups (p<0.01). Median overall survival was 12, 11 and 7 months for the different age groups (p<0.01).Patients treated with chemotherapy showed comparable median overall survival of 13, 14 and 10 months for the different age groups (p=0.11). When adjusted for confounders, age was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION Elderly patients are less likely to be treated with chemotherapy, but when treated with chemotherapy, their survival is comparable to younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J H Brada
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M S Walma
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R M van Dam
- Dept. of Surgery, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Dept. of Internal Medicine, Div. of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Dept. of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Dept. of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - G J Creemers
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S Liem
- Dept. of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - L J Mekenkamp
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - D J A de Groot
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Dept. of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - S Festen
- Dept. of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E D Kerver
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M R Meijerink
- Dept. of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Dept. of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - J F Pruijt
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - M B Polée
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - J A Ropela
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, St Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xie H, Liu J, Ogden JR, Yin J, Jatoi A, Hubbard JM, McWilliams RR, Mahipal A, Petersen GM, Bekaii-Saab TS, Ma WW. Survival Benefit of Combination Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:586-590. [PMID: 32349022 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Survival benefit of combination over single-agent chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) was demonstrated in younger patients in clinical trials. The authors aimed to evaluate whether this survival benefit of combination chemotherapy is present in elderly patients with metastatic PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors identified elderly patients (age 65 y or older) with stage IV PDAC and extracted available clinical information from a prospectively maintained institutional pancreatic cancer registry from 2007 to 2016. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for multivariable survival analyses. Survival outcomes for the entire cohort and by age group I (elderly, 65 to 75 y) and age group II (very elderly, older than 75 y) were assessed. RESULTS A total of 606 patients were included with a median age of 73.8 years. Among them, 239 patients (39%) received combination chemotherapy and 152 patients (25.1%) received single-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Combination chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer median overall survival compared with single-agent chemotherapy (10.9 vs. 7.5 mo, P<0.001) with hazard ratio 0.62 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.81; P=0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level. Analyses by age groups indicated that very elderly patients (age group II) benefited from combination chemotherapy compared with single-agent chemotherapy with hazard ratio 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-1; P=0.049), comparable with the age group I (Page-treatment interaction=0.81). CONCLUSION Elderly patients, even those older than 75 years, with metastatic PDAC benefited from combination chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Xie
- Division of Medical Oncology
| | - Junjia Liu
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Jun Yin
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vivaldi C, Salani F, Rovesti G, Pecora I, Catanese S, Casadei-Gardini A, Massa V, Bernardini L, Riggi L, Andrikou K, Rapposelli GI, Formica V, Lencioni M, Falcone A, Vasile E, Fornaro L. First-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Crossing the frontier of age? Eur J Cancer 2020; 137:108-116. [PMID: 32750500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (Gem-Nab) represents a standard first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), but few data are available for elderly patients. We aimed to add evidence about safety and efficacy of Gem-Nab in this population. METHODS We collected data of 156 patients with mPC aged ≥65 years receiving Gem-Nab. Patients were stratified according to age: <70 (group 1: 65 patients) and ≥70 years (group 2: 91 patients). RESULTS The median age was 71 years (range: 65-87 years). The toxicity profile was similar between group 1 and 2, except for all-grade anaemia (92.1% vs. 78.7%, respectively; p = 0.04) and neurotoxicity (61.9% vs. 40.4%, respectively; p = 0.02), also as a result of a lower dose intensity of nab-paclitaxel (83.3% vs. 90.5%, respectively; p = 0.04) administered to oldest patients. The response rate was 25.6% (group 1 vs. 2: 20.0% vs. 29.7%; p = 0.12). After a median follow-up of 26.5 months, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The starting dose of Gem-Nab did not affect PFS and OS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Gem-Nab is active and effective in older patients with mPC, with the results in line with the general mPC population enrolled in clinical trials. Mild dose modifications for elderly patients might be considered to improve safety without impairing efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Vivaldi
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Savi 6, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Francesca Salani
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Giulia Rovesti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, 41100, Italy
| | - Irene Pecora
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Silvia Catanese
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli N. 40, Meldola, 47014, Italy
| | - Valentina Massa
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Laura Bernardini
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Laura Riggi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, 41100, Italy
| | - Kalliopi Andrikou
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, Modena, 41100, Italy
| | - Giovanni I Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Via P. Maroncelli N. 40, Meldola, 47014, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Formica
- Medical Oncology Unit, Tor Vergata University, Viale Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy
| | - Monica Lencioni
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Alfredo Falcone
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy; Department of Translational Research and New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, Via Savi 6, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Enrico Vasile
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fornaro
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, Pisa, 56126, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Franck C, Müller C, Rosania R, Croner RS, Pech M, Venerito M. Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Moving Forward. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1955. [PMID: 32708493 PMCID: PMC7409054 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, the death rate of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has doubled over 30 years and is likely to further increase, making PDAC a leading cause of cancer-related death in the coming years. PDAC is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage, and modified FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine are the mainstay of systemic therapy. For elderly patients with good performance status, low-dose treatment can preserve quality of life without compromising cancer control or survival. Maintenance therapy should be considered in PDAC patients achieving disease control with systemic therapy. In particular, olaparib has demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit of 3.6 months in a subgroup of PDAC patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (ca. 10% of all PDAC). Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is often omitted in the treatment of patients with PDAC, with possibly deleterious consequences. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is highly prevalent in patients with PDAC and should be considered in the diagnostic algorithm of PDAC patients with bloating and diarrhea. Rivaroxaban has been associated with a reduced risk of thrombosis without an increase in major bleeding events, and its use should be considered in every patient with advanced PDAC undergoing systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caspar Franck
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (C.F.); (C.M.); (R.R.)
| | - Christian Müller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (C.F.); (C.M.); (R.R.)
| | - Rosa Rosania
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (C.F.); (C.M.); (R.R.)
| | - Roland S. Croner
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Maciej Pech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Marino Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; (C.F.); (C.M.); (R.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Drug-Drug Interactions of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin and Its Activity in Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment. Molecules 2020; 25:molecules25112614. [PMID: 32512790 PMCID: PMC7321123 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25112614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) is the standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This strategy inhibits tumor growth but provokes drug resistance and serious side effects. We aimed to improve FOLFOXIRI by optimization of the dosing and the sequence of drug administration. We employed an orthogonal array composite design and linear regression analysis to obtain cell line-specific drug combinations for four CRC cell lines (DLD1, SW620, HCT116, LS174T). Our results confirmed the synergy between folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil and additivity, or even antagonism, between the other drugs of the combination. The drug combination administered at clinical doses resulted in significantly higher antagonistic interactions compared to the low-dose optimized drug combination (ODC). We found that the concomitant administration of the optimized drug combination (ODC) was comparatively active to sequential administration. However, the administration of oxaliplatin or the active metabolite of irinotecan seemed to sensitize the cells to the combination of folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil. ODCs were similarly active in non-cancerous cells as compared to the clinically used doses, indicating a lack of reduction of side effects. Interestingly, ODCs were inactive in CRC cells chronically pretreated with FOLFOXIRI, suggesting the occurrence of resistance. We were unable to improve FOLFOXIRI in terms of efficacy or specificity. Improvement of CRC treatment should come from the optimization of targeted drugs and immunotherapy strategies.
Collapse
|
19
|
The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2020; 20:95-100. [PMID: 31786057 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or abraxane plus gemcitabine (AG)-based chemotherapy is used widely as firstline treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. However, their use in the elderly is discouraged because of adverse events. More clinical data about the therapeutic response and tolerability to FFX or AG in elderly patents (over 70 years old) are required. METHODS Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (n = 203; 131 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients (MPC) and 72 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients (LAPC)) were treated using modified-FFX (mFFX) or AG and mFFX sequentially. The patients were grouped according to their age, patients below 70 years old and patients above 70 years old. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were compared between the groups. RESULTS The ORRs in the elderly and in patients below 70 were similar (30.0% versus 32.3%). The median OS and PFS were also similar between the groups (mOS 13.3 m vs 12.7 m, p = 0.729, HR 0.874 (95% CI 0.5310 to 1.438); mPFS mPFS 10.6 m vs 10.3 m, p = 0.363, HR 0.800 (95% CI 0.4954 to 1.293)). However, the elderly patients suffered a higher incidence of severe adverse events (50% vs. 28.3%). CONCLUSIONS These data could provide guidance for chemotherapy use in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Age did not affect treatment outcome; however, supportive treatment is very important for elderly patients receiving chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Costa JG, de Jesus VHF, Camandaroba MPG, Dettino ALA. Characteristics and survival of older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of the AC Camargo Cancer Center experience. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2019; 11:1758835919874650. [PMID: 31534492 PMCID: PMC6737872 DOI: 10.1177/1758835919874650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Advanced age is the most important risk factor for pancreatic cancer and about half of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease. In the first-line setting, multidrug chemotherapy regimens were shown to be more effective than gemcitabine alone. However, the older population was under-represented in randomized clinical trials. We aimed to describe the clinical profile of older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and their survival outcomes. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, unicentric study that included patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer (non-neuroendocrine), aged 65 years and over. Results: The study population comprised 196 patients. The median age was 73 years; 67% of these patients presented Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) ⩽ 1 and the median Charlson Comorbidity score was 10. Chemotherapy was given to 89% of the patients. The most frequently used chemotherapy regimens were gemcitabine (44%), 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX; 26%], and 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX; 20%). Patients treated with FOLFIRINOX were younger and they presented better performance status. After a median follow up of 19.8 months, the median overall survival (OS) was of 7.2 months and the median time to first-line-treatment failure was 4.6 months. Among patients treated with chemotherapy, the median OS was highest for those treated with FOLFIRINOX (13.8 months), as compared with FOLFOX (7.0 months) or gemcitabine (6.7 months); p = 0.004. Nonetheless, treatment with FOLFIRINOX was associated with increased risk of severe toxicity (p = 0.008). Conclusion: Older patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer benefit from palliative chemotherapy, and FOLFIRINOX is a therapeutic option in rigorously selected older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus
- Medical Oncology Department AC Camargo Cancer Center Rua Prof. Antônio Prudente, 211 - 01509-010, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
White MN, Dotan E, Catalano PJ, Cardin DB, Berlin JD. Advanced pancreatic cancer clinical trials: The continued underrepresentation of older patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:540-546. [PMID: 30573201 PMCID: PMC6579713 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2018] [Revised: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Older patients make up the majority of patients with pancreatic cancer, with a median age of 71 years at diagnosis. However, older patients are underrepresented in clinical trials in pancreatic cancer. This study investigates trends in age distribution of patients enrolled in clinical trials for advanced pancreatic cancer over time, and examines outcomes and toxicity in older patient subgroups from two studies conducted by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) in this disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS 16,042 patients from 38 phase III clinical trials for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma published between 1997 and 2016 were identified and included in this analysis. Outcomes and toxicity by age were examined in two of the trials, ECOG-ACRIN trials E2297 and E6201, which included a total of 1146 patients. RESULTS The median age across the trials was 62.7 years; median ages for individual trials ranged from 57 years to 66 years. Weighted linear regression showed no significant change in median age over time. Combined analysis of the two ECOG-ACRIN trials demonstrated higher rates of fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and infection in those ≥75 years compared with those <75 years, but despite this showed no difference in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) (OS: 5.7 vs. 5.6 months and PFS: 2.8 vs 3.5 months). CONCLUSIONS Enrollment of older adults in phase III pancreatic cancer clinical trials has not increased over time, despite increasing number of older patients seen in clinic. Increased efforts are needed to enhance enrollment of older patients in clinical trials, and to promote trials specifically for older patients, in order to improve the evidence base for treating this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya N White
- Stanford Cancer Institute, CCSR Building 1136, MC 5151, Stanford, California, 94305, USA.
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
| | - Paul J Catalano
- Department of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute CLSB 11015, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Dana B Cardin
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| | - Jordan D Berlin
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Enrico Vasile
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Deyme L, Barbolosi D, Gattacceca F. Population pharmacokinetics of FOLFIRINOX: a review of studies and parameters. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 83:27-42. [DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3722-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
24
|
Macchini M, Chiaravalli M, Zanon S, Peretti U, Mazza E, Gianni L, Reni M. Chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer: Efficacy, feasibility and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 72:1-6. [PMID: 30414985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
By 2030 70% of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will occur in older adults. Elderly patients, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as people older than 65 years, represent a heterogeneous group with different biological and functional characteristics that need personalized anticancer treatments. Since older patients are under-represented in randomized phase III trials, their management is mostly extrapolated from studies performed in younger patients, without robust evidence-based recommendations. However, data from retrospective studies and case-control series show that elderly may benefit from chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Although with discordant results, gemcitabine-based treatment and dose-adapted fluorouracil combination regimens seem to be effective and well tolerated in this subset of patients. A proper balance of potential treatment benefits and side effects represent the crucial point for managing elderly patients with PDAC. Therefore an appropriate patient selection is essential to maximize the therapeutic benefit in the older population: randomized studies aiming to better standardizing fitness parameters and implementing the routine use of comprehensive geriatric assessments are strongly warranted. In this light, the detection of molecular prognostic markers able to detect patients who may benefit more from oncological treatments should be a primary endpoint of age-focused clinical trials. Altogether, the field of geriatric oncology will expand in the next years, and the clinical management of elderly patients affected by PDAC will become a major public health issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Macchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Chiaravalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Zanon
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Peretti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Mazza
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Olson JL, Bold RJ. Currently available first-line drug therapies for treating pancreatic cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19:1927-1940. [PMID: 30325679 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1509954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the 9th most common cancer in the United States and the 4th most common cause of cancer-related death given its poor prognosis. AREAS COVERED The authors have performed a literature search for pertinent published clinical trials, ongoing Phase 3 clinical trials, and current treatment guidelines using PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, and NCCN, ASCO, ESMO, and JPS websites. The review itself discusses landmark studies and ongoing research into the chemotherapy regimens recommended by each oncologic society. The authors also examine drugs that were promising but failed in Phase 3 trials and those currently being investigated. Finally, the authors provide their expert opinion on the subject and provide their future perspectives. EXPERT OPINION While advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer have been limited in comparison to other cancers, there have been improvements in survival. Combination therapy and a goal of R0 resection are key elements to extend life. Novel agents directed at the unique properties of pancreatic cancer are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Olson
- a Division of Surgical Oncology , UC Davis Cancer Center , Sacramento , CA , USA
| | - Richard J Bold
- a Division of Surgical Oncology , UC Davis Cancer Center , Sacramento , CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Macarulla T, Carrato A, Díaz R, García A, Laquente B, Sastre J, Álvarez R, Muñoz A, Hidalgo M. Management and supportive treatment of frail patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 10:398-404. [PMID: 30005980 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Data regarding management of frail patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma practice is currently very scarce. Randomized clinical trials usually exclude these subgroup of patients and the majority of the publications only consider chronological age and ECOG performance status for their classification. Therefore, the current available data do not reflect daily clinical practice. Only data from a phase two study (FRAGANCE study), designed to select a tolerable dose-schedule of nab-placitaxel + gemcitabine (Phase one) and to evaluate the efficacy of the selected regimen (Phase two) in patients with ECOG-2 and previously untreated advanced PDAC, are currently available. Management of these particular patients is exceedingly complex and requires collaboration of multidisciplinary teams and intensive support treatment. This article reviews the literature available regarding the management of the so-called frail patients and provide guidance for chemotherapy as well as supportive care treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Macarulla
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - A Carrato
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Díaz
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - A García
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, de Girona, Spain
| | - B Laquente
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Sastre
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Spain
| | - R Álvarez
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Muñoz
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Hidalgo
- Dpt. Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Garcia G, Odaimi M. Systemic Combination Chemotherapy in Elderly Pancreatic Cancer: a Review. J Gastrointest Cancer 2018; 48:121-128. [PMID: 28303435 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-017-9930-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, significant progress in survival has been achieved using systemic combination chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, the elderly are largely underrepresented in clinical trials, and gains made from these may not necessarily apply to this important subgroup of patients. We review the currently available data regarding contemporary combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, and gemcitabine plus capecitabine, in elderly pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS We performed a search of Pubmed using the terms "pancreatic cancer", "elderly", "FOLFIRINOX", "gemcitabine", "nab-paclitaxel", "capecitabine", and "nanoliposomal irinotecan" and included articles investigating the use of combination chemotherapy in the elderly with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Relevant abstracts from American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meetings were included. RESULTS Current clinical evidence and experience suggests that relatively fit elderly pancreatic cancer patients may derive significant benefit from contemporary combination chemotherapy regimens. Strategies to improve tolerability without decreasing efficacy include dose reduction, schedule modification, and growth factor support. Phase III clinical trials are ongoing to determine the optimal use of combination chemotherapy regimens in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Identifying elderly patients who will benefit from combination chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer remains a significant clinical challenge. An assessment of medical comorbidities and functional status plays a key role in determining fitness for intensive chemotherapeutic regimens in this important subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenalyn Garcia
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA.
| | - Marcel Odaimi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Corrigan LR, Bracken-Clarke DM, Horgan AM. The challenge of treating older patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Curr Probl Cancer 2018; 42:59-72. [PMID: 29459178 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2017] [Revised: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic and biliary tract cancers are aggressive malignancies. They commonly present with metastatic or unresectable disease. Those that do present with resectable cancer have high rates of recurrence. Despite recent advances in surgical technique, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy regimens, they are associated with poor survival outcomes. These cancers represent an exception to the trend of improved overall survival evident in most malignancies in recent decades. Depending on the goal of treatment, active management of pancreatic and biliary cancers involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, either alone or in combination. Both pancreatic and biliary tract cancers have a preponderance in the older population. Older patients are a heterogeneous group; although tolerability of multimodality treatment may be a challenge for some, many fit older patients may be undertreated based on their age alone. The growing field of geriatric oncology has highlighted the importance of a comprehensive assessment of these patients, and not relying on age alone as a discriminating factor for treatment. Management of older patients with pancreaticobiliary cancers is particularly challenging owing to limited prospective data in this population. As such, there is uncertainty with regard to optimal treatment approaches for these patients. In this article, we outline the therapeutic options available to patients with localized or advanced pancreatic and biliary tract cancers, and the evidence for specified treatment options in the elderly. We examine the inclusion and outcomes of elderly patients in relevant clinical trials; the morbidity that may be encountered by elderly patients receiving specified treatments and the tools that may assist the physician in selecting elderly patients for particular treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynda R Corrigan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Co Waterford, Ireland.
| | - Dara M Bracken-Clarke
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Co Waterford, Ireland
| | - Anne M Horgan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Waterford, Ardkeen, Co Waterford, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Saung MT, Zheng L. Current Standards of Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Clin Ther 2017; 39:2125-2134. [PMID: 28939405 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis due to the early development of systemic metastatic disease. Chemotherapeutic agents are the only systemic therapy that offers patients meaningful benefit. METHODS This study reviewed the literature for recently published Phase III clinical trials whose results have guided the current standards of chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. FINDINGS Although combination chemotherapy regimens are shown to be superior to gemcitabine monotherapy for both metastatic pancreatic cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection, it should be recognized that all combination chemotherapy regimens offer only limited benefits. In addition, there is a paucity of clinical trials that directly compare the various combination chemotherapy regimens. IMPLICATIONS With the advancement of systemic cancer treatment beyond chemotherapy, it is important to devote more investigation into better understanding the biology of these chemotherapy regimens, such that we combine them with targeted therapeutics and immunotherapeutics in a rational and scientific manner. For the current treatment of pancreatic cancer, the available chemotherapy regimens have shown modest but statistically significant improvements in survival. However, it is important to avoid cross-comparisons of trials and choose regimens based on patient characteristics and the side-effect profiles of the regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May Tun Saung
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lei Zheng
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|