Accuracy of human papillomavirus tests on self-collected urine versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical precancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A review of urinary HPV testing for cervical cancer management and HPV vaccine surveillance: rationale, strategies, and limitations

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the leading cause of cervical cancer, the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Despite concerted efforts to combat this preventable disease through HPV vaccination and cancer screening have helped reduce morbidity and mortality levels, the burden persists in both developing and developed countries due to insufficient vaccination and screening coverage. Urinary HPV testing has emerged as a noninvasive detection method, offering significant advantages in cervical cancer management and vaccine surveillance. Notably, it boasts high acceptance rates, ease of self-collection, user-friendly implementation, and relatively low cost. Various urinary HPV detection methods have been explored, predominantly relying on nucleic acid amplification and signal amplification, targeting a variety of biomarkers in urine, such as HPV DNA, RNA, and oncoproteins. Existing literature underscores urine as a promising specimen for HPV testing, demonstrating comparable detection performance to cervical and vaginal samples in several studies. However, the lack of standardized and authoritative protocols in sample collection, storage, preparation, DNA extraction, and amplification necessitates further evaluation for the comprehensive utilization of urinary HPV testing in clinical and epidemiological settings. This study aims to review pertinent publications and offer insights into the rationale, common strategies, and limitations of urinary HPV testing, with the ultimate goal of maximizing its utility in practice.

Epidemiology Characteristics and Potential Cervical Cancer Screening Value of Vulvar Human Papillomavirus in Chinese Women: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

CONTEXT.—

Noninvasive self-sampling is a convenient option that may be highly accepted by women for home-based detection, which could increase the screening rate for cervical cancer (CC) and reduce its incidence and mortality.

OBJECTIVE.—

To compare the distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) between the vulva and cervix and to explore the clinical value of vulvar HPV detection in CC screening.

DESIGN.—

The study was nested within a clinical trial on a recombinant HPV 9-valent vaccine for women ages 20 to 45 years. Women with paired vulvar and cervical specimens were included and underwent cytology and HPV detection. The consistency of HPV detection between vulvar and cervical specimens was evaluated using Cohen κ statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of primary CC screening. The primary end points were cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2/3 or worse (CIN2+/3+).

RESULTS.—

A total of 7999 women were enrolled, and 83/33 cases were diagnosed as CIN2+/CIN3+. The HPV-positive rate in vulvar specimens (1785 of 7999; 22.32%) was higher than that in cervical specimens (1390 of 7999; 17.38%), and there were no significant differences in the distribution of hr-HPV genotypes between the vulva and cervix in patients with CIN2+/CIN3+. Vulva-based HPV primary screening showed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV comparable to those for cervix-based HPV primary CC screening in the detection of CIN3+.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The distribution of vulvar and cervical HPV was similar in patients with CIN2+/CIN3+. Vulva-based HPV primary CC screening had acceptable diagnostic efficacy and might be used as a modality for primary CC screening.

Cervical Human Papillomavirus Testing: Current and Future Impact on Patient Care

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide. The identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the main etiologic cause of cervical cancer has led to the development and adaptation of HPV molecular diagnostics as a cervical cancer screening and prevention tool. This article highlights six Food and Drug Administration-approved HPV molecular platforms, each with unique advantages and disadvantages. In addition, HPV vaccination and the emergence of HPV self-collection as an alternative testing strategy are discussed.

Optimizing Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Screening: Urine Sample Analysis and Associated Factors in Uzbekistan

Objective This study assessed the accuracy of detecting Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in urine samples compared to cervical samples and identified factors associated with HPV DNA positivity in Uzbekistan. Methods A total of 218 paired urine and cervical samples were collected from women in Uzbekistan. HPV DNA was detected using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with genotyping. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with HPV DNA positivity. Results The study included 32.6% (71/218) positive HPV DNA by cervical samples, which demonstrated 19.7% (43/218) HPV DNA presence by urine samples. Urine HPV testing had a sensitivity of 57.7%, specificity of 98.6%, PPV of 95.3%, NPV of 82.9%, and Kappa coefficient of 60.1. To reveal factors associated with HPV DNA positivity, we set the positive 71 cases as the main group, and 147 negative samples as the control group. The results of the multivariate analysis found the association between HPV DNA positivity and included age 31-40 years (AOR=8.2), working as medical staff (AOR=7.51), condom use (AOR=0.12), having foamy (AOR=7.26) or purulent (AOR=6.84) vaginal discharge. Conclusion Urine HPV testing showed good agreement with cervical samples, although sensitivity was lower than some previous reports. Several sociodemographic and clinical factors were associated with HPV DNA positivity. Further optimization of urine collection, storage, and testing methods may improve sensitivity. Targeted screening of high-risk groups could enhance HPV prevention strategies in Uzbekistan.

Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control

Despite the introduction of Pap testing for screening to prevent cervical cancer in the mid-20th century, cervical cancer remains a common cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity globally. This is primarily due to differences in access to screening and care between low-income and high-income resource settings, resulting in cervical cancer being one of the cancers with the greatest health disparity. The discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the near-obligate viral cause of cervical cancer can revolutionize how it can be prevented: HPV vaccination against infection for prophylaxis and HPV testing-based screening for the detection and treatment of cervical pre-cancers for interception. As a result of this progress, the World Health Organization has championed the elimination of cervical cancer as a global health problem. However, unless research, investments, and actions are taken to ensure equitable global access to these highly effective preventive interventions, there is a real threat to exacerbating the current health inequities in cervical cancer. In this review, the progress to date and the challenges and opportunities for fulfilling the potential of HPV-targeted prevention for global cervical cancer control are discussed.

Prevalence and correlates of Human Papillomavirus infection in females from Southern Province, Zambia: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is strongly associated with cervical cancer with almost all cases being associated with the infection. Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women in Zambia and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. However, there is limited data on the burden and associated factors of HPV in sub-Saharan Africa. This study therefore aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of HPV infection in the Southern province of Zambia.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Livingstone University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) among 4,612 women from different districts of the southern province being screened for HPV infection between September 2021 and August 2022. Demographic and clinical data were collected from an existing laboratory programmatic database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the factors associated with HPV infection.

RESULTS

The study participants had a median age of 39 years [interquartile range (IQR) 30, 47]. The prevalence of HPV infection was 35.56% (95%CI). At multivariable analysis, the factors associated with a positive HPV result were younger age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-0.99; p. value 0.001), having provider collected sample (AOR 2.15; 95%CI 1.66-2.79; p. value <0.001) and living with HIV (AOR 1.77; 95%CI 1.22-2.55; p. value <0.002).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HPV in women in the southern province of Zambia is high, and likely influenced by age and HIV status. Additionally, the outcome of the HPV test is affected by the sample collection method. Therefore, there is a necessity to enhance HPV and cervical cancer screening, especially among people with HIV.

CER818: A Highly Specific and Sensitive HPV L1 High-Risk Serological Lateral Flow Rapid Test for Early Detection of Cervical Cancer and Its Precursor Lesions

Objective: The objective of the study is to validate a new human papillomavirus (HPV) L1 high-risk specific serological assay in a case-control study. Methods: Serum samples of 138 patients (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, 2, and 3 and cervical cancer), 21 vaccinees, and 246 female controls were tested for the presence of HPV L1 high-risk specific antibodies. Results: HPV L1 high-risk antibodies were detected in 100% of the CIN1 and 2, 86.6% of the CIN3 and 82.4% of the cervical cancer cases, 100% of the vaccinees, and 3.9% of the female controls. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated with 0.91 for controls versus CIN2+, 0.923 for controls versus CIN1+, and 0.968 for controls versus CIN1/2. Conclusion: The HPV L1 high-risk specific serological lateral flow rapid test shows promising data in the field of early detection of HPV high-risk induced cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. This easy-to-use, robust, and affordable approach could offer a chance to reach women in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) that could not be reached by HPV molecular testing-based cervical cancer screening programs.

A phase 1/2a, dose-escalation, safety, and preliminary efficacy study of the RKP00156 vaginal tablet in healthy women and patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of the RKP00156 vaginal tablet, a CDK9 inhibitor, in healthy women and patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2).

METHODS

We conducted a phase 1/2a clinical trial of RKP00156. In step 1, RKP00156 at a dose of 10, 25, or 50 mg or a placebo tablet was administered transvaginally to 24 healthy women. In step 2, RKP00156 at a dose of 10, 25, or 50 mg or a placebo tablet was administered once daily for 4 weeks in 62 patients with CIN2. The primary endpoints of this trial were the safety of RKP00156 and the change in the human papillomavirus (HPV) viral load.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were enrolled and randomized. RKP00156 administration did not cause serious drug-associated adverse events (AEs). Although no significant difference in the HPV viral load was found between the experimental and placebo groups, a reduction in the HPV viral load was observed in the 25 mg-dose group (-98.61%; 95% confidence interval=-99.83%, 4.52%; p=0.046) after treatment completion in patients with a high HPV viral load, despite a lack of statistical power. No differences in histologic regression and HPV clearance were observed.

CONCLUSION

The safety of RKP00156 was proved with no serious AEs. Although the study did not show any significance in histologic regression and HPV clearance, our findings indicate that RKP00156 may have a possibility of short-term inhibitory effect on HPV replication in patients with higher viral loads.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02139267.

The Impact of Urine-Sample HPV Testing on the Effectiveness of Screening for Cervical Cancer: An Umbrella Review

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of urine-sample HPV (human papillomavirus) testing on the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer.

METHODS

The analysis was based on the results of a systematic review. Secondary studies were searched in the following medical databases: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The results of the statistical tests presented in the article originate from research conducted by the authors of the included articles.

RESULTS

From a total of 1869 citations, 5 studies were included in this review. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any HPV from first-void urine samples were 87% [95% CI: (0.74; 0.94)] and 89% [95% CI: (0.81; 0.93)], respectively. Moreover, participants in the analyzed studies had indicated that they felt comfortable with urine testing.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of methods to detect HPV infection in first-void urine samples and the application of this sampling method in widely available screening tests could significantly increase patients' willingness to participate in testing.

Genital and Oral HPV Geno-Prevalence Measured through Urine and Saliva Samples in Young Adults in Italy

BACKGROUND

The aims of the study were to determine, in the urine and oral samples of young adults, the genotype-specific prevalence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection, the HPV DNA type-specific prevalence in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals, and the determinants of HPV infection.

METHODS

Selected participants were asked to fill in a self-administered questionnaire and to self-collect urine and saliva samples.

RESULTS

Among the 1002 participants, 81 (8.1%) resulted positive for HPV DNA. The most common low-risk genotype was HPV 42 (2.2%), followed by HPV 43 (0.8%), and 40 (0.5%). The HPV 51 was the most common high-risk genotype (1.5%) followed by HPV 66 (1%) and HPV 68 (1%), and no participants were infected with HPV genotypes 18, 33, 45. Females, those who have had one or more occasional sexual partner, those who never/rarely/sometimes used condoms during their sexual activity, those with a previous diagnosis of sexually transmitted infection, and those who were not vaccinated were more likely to be tested positive for HPV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The low prevalence of genital HPV infections has provided evidence of the effectiveness of HPV vaccination both in vaccinated and not yet vaccinated subjects through herd immunity and indicated its decisive role in the changing epidemiology of circulating HPV genotypes in the population.

Clinical Accuracy of Alinity m HR HPV Assay on Self- versus Clinician-Taken Samples Using the VALHUDES Protocol

The VALHUDES protocol was established to evaluate clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays to detect cervical precancer on first-void urine (FVU) and vaginal self-samples versus matched clinician-collected cervical samples (CCSs). Here we evaluated clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV assay in a colposcopy referral population. Home-collected FVU (Colli-Pee FV 5020) 1 day before colposcopy (n = 492), at-clinic collected dry vaginal self-samples [multi-Collect Swab (mC; n = 493), followed by Evalyn Brush (EB; n = 233) or Qvintip (QT; n = 260)] and matched CCSs, were available for the study. Sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) of Alinity testing on FVU (ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03), mC (ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06), and EB/QT (ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-1.00) was not different to CCSs. Specificity on FVU was similar to CCS (ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10), whereas specificity on mC was lower (ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90), but on EB/QT was higher (ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15) than on CCS. Accuracy on EB (sensitivity ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05; specificity ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.31) was slightly better than on QT (sensitivity ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.03; specificity ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92-1.09). In conclusion, clinical sensitivity of Alinity assay on all self-sample types was similar to cervical specimens. Adjustment of signal thresholds improved assay's accuracy to detect CIN2+ in all self-sample types.

Testing for Human Papillomaviruses in Urine, Blood, and Oral Specimens: an Update for the Laboratory

Twelve high-risk alpha human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes cause approximately 690,000 cancer cases annually, with cervical and oropharyngeal cancer being the two most prominent types. HPV testing is performed in laboratory settings for various applications of a clinical, epidemiological, and research nature using a range of clinical specimens collected by clinicians or by individuals (self-collected specimens). Here, we reflect on the importance and justification of using the right test for the right application and provide practical updates for laboratories either participating in or anticipating involvement in HPV testing in three specimen types, namely, urine, blood, and oral specimens, which are considered "alternative" specimens by many. In addition to clinician-collected cervical samples and self-collected cervicovaginal samples, first-void urine is emerging as a credible specimen for HPV-based cervical cancer screening, triage of HPV screen-positive women, monitoring HPV vaccine impact, and HPV testing in groups for which a less invasive sample is preferred. Detection of cell-free DNA (including HPV DNA) in blood has great promise for the early detection of HPV-attributable oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-AOC) and potentially other HPV-driven cancers and as an adjunct prognostic marker in long-term tumor surveillance, including treatment response. The moderate sensitivity of HPV testing in oral rinses or swabs at HPV-AOC diagnosis prevents its use in HPV-AOC secondary prevention but represents a promising prognostic tool in HPV-AOC tertiary prevention, where the HPV persistence in oral rinses throughout treatment may predict early HPV-AOC recurrences and/or the development of secondary HPV-AOC. The increasing sophistication of specific collection devices designed for alternative samples and the enhanced precision of novel molecular technologies are likely to support the evolution of this field and catalyze potential translation into routine practice.

Toward 70% cervical cancer screening coverage: Technical challenges and opportunities to increase access to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for the elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem. Cervical cancer screening through human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a core component of the strategy for elimination, with a set target of screening 70% of women twice in their lifetimes. In this review, we discuss technical barriers and opportunities to increase HPV screening globally.

Prevalence of HPV infection among Thai schoolgirls in the north-eastern provinces in 2018: implications for HPV immunization policy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of high-risk (HR) and vaccine-type human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among Thai schoolgirls who were not included in the national HPV immunization program.

METHODS

Cross-sectional surveys were conducted among grade 10 (15-16 years old) and grade 12 (17-18 years old) schoolgirls in two provinces of Thailand. Urine samples were collected using the Colli-Pee^Ⓡ device from November 2018 to February 2019. The samples were initially tested using Cobas^Ⓡ 4800. Subsequently, all Cobas-positive samples and 1:1 matched Cobas-negative samples were tested by Anyplex^Ⓡ assay. Prevalences of any HPV, any HR HPV, vaccine-type HPV, and individual HR HPV types were estimated by school grade.

RESULTS

Prevalences of any HPV and any HR HPV were 11.6% and 8.6% for grade 10, and 18.5% and 12.4% for grade 12 schoolgirls, respectively. Prevalences of bivalent vaccine-type HPV infection in grades 10 and 12 were 3.4% and 4.5%, respectively. Prevalences of quadrivalent and nonavalent vaccine-type HPV infections were 4.0%/6.6% and 6.4%/10.4% in grades 10 and 12, respectively. HPV16 was the most common type detected, followed by HPV58, 51, and 52. Circulating HR HPV types were similar between the school grades.

CONCLUSION

A substantial burden of HR HPV infections was found among unvaccinated high school girls in Thailand.

[Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

METHODS

The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.

Comparison of Urine and Genital Samples for Detecting Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Clinical Patients

Background. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate HPV DNA detection and genotyping on paired genital and urine samples and to evaluate if urine samples could be used to monitor HPV infection. Methods. Study subjects were recruited from one local hospital in Guangdong of China from September 1, 2011, to June 30, 2012. They were invited to participate if they have taken an HPV genotyping assay for clinical diagnosis of the genital-urinary disease or for a health check-up 3–5 days ago. DNA was extracted from paired genital and urine samples; genotyping was performed with the GenoArray assay. Results. A total of 250 patients were recruited, which included 203 females and 47 males. Our results showed that the overall agreement on HPV status between the paired samples was 77.1% (155/201, 95% CI: 0.713–0.829) for females, with a kappa value of 0.523 (95% CI: 0.469–0.632), while the agreement was extremely low in the paired male samples. As to individual genotyping, the greatest agreement was found for HPV16 type-specific identification in females (96.02%, 0.933–0.987), followed by the other 12 high oncogenic risk (HR-HPV) types, while the agreement for low-risk HPV detection is poor (κ < 0.6). Agreement between paired samples showed that HPV detection had a significantly greater concordance in the samples obtained in females than males ( $p$  = 0.002). Moreover, the agreement for low-risk HPV detection was significantly lower as compared to HR-HPV detection (48.1% vs. 62.3%, $p$  = 0.044). Conclusion. Despite reduced sensitivity, HPV detection in urine closely represents the same trend that is seen with genital sampling. Urine appears to be an appropriate surrogate sample for HPV DNA detection in women with very limited access to healthcare, while the utility of urine for HPV DNA detection in males is less certain.

Utilizing first void urine for high-risk HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in HIV-positive women in Katete, Zambia

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization targets to screen 70% of women worldwide twice for cervical cancer by the year 2030, first by age of 35, and again by the age of 45. However, with the current low screening coverage in many developing countries, this may not be achieved because the invasive sampling method is unacceptable to some. In Zambia, for instance, despite the availability of free cervical cancer screening through the establishment of the Cervical Cancer Prevention Programme, some women are still reluctant to go for screening. First void urine sampling is non-invasive and thus has the potential to increase screening coverage. We aimed to determine the performance of first void urine for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection, the prevalence of high-risk HPV, and the acceptability of first void urine sampling.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 HIV- infected women at St Francis' Hospital in Zambia, attending the routine HIV/AIDS services and cervical cancer screening. 17 mL of first void urine sample collected by each participant was immediately mixed with 3 mL of 0.5 M EDTA preservative solution before cervical sample collection by the clinician. For testing, 2 mL of first void urine and 1 mL of the cervical sample were tested using the GeneXpert platform. An interview-based questionnaire was used to gather data on the acceptability of first void urine sampling. Data was analyzed using Stata version 17.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 42.58 years (95% CI 40.98-44.19; SD 8.01). High-risk HPV prevalence was 34% (95% CI 24%-43.9%) in both cervical and first void urine samples. Sensitivity and specificity were 84.8% (95% CI 68.1%-94.9%) and 92.3% (83%-97.5%), respectively. There was 89.80% agreement between the samples (κ = 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.91). First void urine sampling was highly accepted.

CONCLUSION

High-risk HPV DNA can be detected in first void urine samples using the GeneXpert, with a substantial agreement with cervical samples. An affordable preservative such as Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid can prevent DNA degradation. With optimization, first void urine sampling has the potential to increase screening coverage.

HPV screening in the urine of transpeople - A prevalence study

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on human papillomaviruses (HPV) prevalence in transpeople due to low acceptance rate of screening methods. HPV tests from self-collected urine are gender-neutral, have a high acceptance, and have a comparable accuracy in females to clinician-collected samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the HPV prevalence in the urine in a large cohort of 200 transpeople with common risk profiles and the acceptability of such screening method.

METHODS

The study was conducted at the outpatient clinic for transpeople at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. 200 transpeople have been enrolled between May and October 2021. Inclusion criteria were gender identity dysphoria, age over 18 years, and adequate language skills.Subjects were asked to answer a survey concerning gender identity, established risk factors for HPV infections as well as their preference regarding urine or provider-collected cytology-/HPV-based screening, and to provide a urine sample. Five patients not able to provide urine were excluded. HPV genotyping was performed using a validated multiplex real-time PCR assay, which simultaneously detects 28 HPV genotypes. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04864951.

FINDINGS

Overall HPV positivity was 19·0% (37/195), 24·2% in female to male, 11·8% in male to female, 26·3% in genderqueer/non binary/other subjects, 27·9% in subjects currently having a cervix, and 26·0% in subjects born with cervix. Independent of gender reassignment surgery, being born with a cervix was associated with a higher risk of HPV infections (p = 0·008), yet 42·3% (44/104) have never attended cervical cancer screening. Overall, 79·0% (154/195) of transpeople would prefer urine HPV tests to provider-collected HPV screening.

INTERPRETATION

HPV testing in self-collected urine samples provides a unique opportunity for screening of this hard-to-reach population and should be evaluated in further studies.

FUNDING

None.

Clinical Performance of the RealTime High Risk HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples within the VALHUDES Framework

The VALHUDES framework (NCT03064087) was established to evaluate the clinical accuracy of HPV testing on self-samples compared with HPV testing on matched clinician-taken cervical samples. Women referred to colposcopy due to previous cervical abnormalities were recruited at five Belgian colposcopy centers. A total of 486 pairs of matched cervical samples and vaginal self-samples were included in the analysis (228 collected with Evalyn Brush and 258 with Qvintip). The dry vaginal brushes were transferred into 20 mL ThinPrep PreservCyt solution. All specimens were tested with the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT). Testing on vaginal and cervical specimens was considered the index and comparator tests, respectively, and colposcopy and histology as the reference standard. The clinical sensitivity for CIN2+ of Abbott RT (cutoff ≤32 cycle number [CN]) on vaginal self-samples (Evalyn Brush and Qvintip combined) was 8% lower than on the cervical clinician-collected samples (ratio = 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98]), while the specificity was similar (ratio = 1.04 [95% CI, 0.97 to 1.12]). Sensitivity (ratio = 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.02]) and specificity (ratio = 1.11 [95% CI, 0.995 to 1.23]) on Evalyn Brush samples was similar to cervical, while on Qvintip samples, the sensitivity was 12% lower than cervical samples (ratio = 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.998]) with similar specificity (0.99 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.10]). Exploratory cutoff optimization (cutoff ≤35 CN) resulted in an improvement of the relative sensitivity (self-sampling versus clinician sampling: ratio = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.02]) but yielded a loss in relative specificity (ratio = 0.92 [0.85 to 1.00]). The clinical accuracy of Abbott RT differed from the self-sampling device. However, after cutoff optimization, the sensitivity on self-samples taken with either of two vaginal brushes became similar to clinician-collected samples. IMPORTANCE Self-samples are becoming a crucial part of HPV-based cervical cancer screening programs to reach nonattendee women and increase screening coverage. Therefore, the VALHUDES framework was established to validate and evaluate HPV tests and devices on self-samples. Here, in the present manuscript, we evaluated the accuracy of the RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott RT) on two different vaginal devices to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or higher (CIN2+). The study results demonstrated that the Abbott RT assay is similarly accurate on vaginal self-samples as on matched clinician-taken cervical samples after adjusting cutoff values. Moreover, we observed that some vaginal devices perform better than others in CIN2+ detection. We also underline the necessity of standardization and validation of general workflow and sample handling procedures for vaginal self-samples.

Cervical Cancer Screening among Female Refugees in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is mainly linked to infection with a high-risk oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV), with 85% of deaths occurring in developing countries. Refugees are less likely to be aware of screening methods and to have routine gynecological examinations. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study involving a total of 359 women aged 19–64 living in the Jerash camp in Jordan. Data were collected using a carefully developed and validated questionnaire. Results: A total of 359 participants were included in the study, with a mean age of 38.99 ± 10.53. Participants demonstrated fair knowledge of CC risk factors (4.77 ± 2.85 out of 11). Among the participants, 73.5% had heard of the cervical smear test; however, only 12.8% had actually undergone the test, with a mean total number of smear tests performed of 1.48 ± 0.79 and the mean age at the time of the first test was 32.5 ± 7.89. Conclusions: Refugee women have a fair level of knowledge of CC risk factors but are unmotivated to have a Pap smear test to screen for CC. Efforts should be made to raise awareness about the issue and promote testing for underrepresented women in refugee camps.

High Expression of Circular RNA-Mitochondrial tRNA Translation Optimization 1 Assists the Diagnosis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Persistence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is a paramount determinant in cervical cancer (CC) development. Circular RNAs have the potential to be promising biomarkers for various cancers. This study explored circular RNA-mitochondrial tRNA translation optimization 1 (circMTO1) expression in the serum of CC patients and its clinical value in diagnosing CC and predicting HR-HPV infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 125 CC patients (including 78 cases with HR-HPV) were enrolled, with another 76 healthy people as controls. Serum circMTO1 and miR-199a expressions were detected by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and the diagnostic efficacy of circMTO1 for CC and HR-HPV infection was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve. According to the median of serum circMTO1 expression, CC patients were assigned into circMTO1 low/high expression groups to analyze the correlation between circMTO1 and clinical parameters using the Fisher and χ 2 tests. Independent association of circMTO1 with HR-HPV infection in CC was evaluated via logistics multivariate regression analysis. Targeted relationship between miR-199a and circMTO1 was predicted by Starbase Web site and validated via dual-luciferase assay, with their correlation further assessed by Pearson analysis.

RESULTS

Serum circMTO1 was increased in CC patients and prominently elevated in HR-HPV-positive CC patients, with a level greater than 1.485 assisting CC diagnosis and a level greater than 2.480 assisting HR-HPV-positive diagnosis. The circMTO1 was interrelated to clinical stage, tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, invasion depth, and independently linked with HR-HPV infection in CC. Serum miR-199a was downregulated in HR-HPV-positive CC patients and inversely correlated with circMTO1.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum circMTO1 is upregulated in HR-HPV-positive CC patients and has a diagnostic value for HR-HPV infection in CC.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, May 2022

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of the roles of researchers and clinicians in fostering evidence-based practice, diagnostic test accuracy in suspected preeclampsia, and the effectiveness of decision-making tools in patients with pre-pregnancy morbidities.