Reappraisal of OMERACT 8 Draft Validation Criteria for a Soluble Biomarker Reflecting Structural Damage Endpoints in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Spondyloarthritis: The OMERACT 9 v2 Criteria

Will 14-3-3η Be a New Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Rheumatoid Arthritis? A Prospective Study of Its Utility in Early Diagnosis and Response to Treatment

Results

Serum14-3-3η levels were significantly higher in all RA patients than in controls (P < 0.001), its sensitivity was 86.7% and 88.3% in early and established RA patients with a significant difference with RF and ACCP at early disease, and the specificity was 96.7%. There was a significant reduction of 14-3-3η levels 6 months after treatment in the first group (p=0.004), and there was a significant positive correlation between serum 14-3-3η levels and parameters of disease activity and severity.

Conclusion

14-3-3η could be a novel, potent, and efficacious diagnostic, and prognostic marker for RA with high sensitivity, that may become a new therapeutic target for RA.

Serum urate as a proposed surrogate outcome measure in gout trials: From the OMERACT working group

Serum urate (SU) is the most common primary efficacy outcome in trials of urate-lowering therapies for gout. Despite this, it is not formally considered a validated surrogate outcome. In this paper we will outline the definitions of biomarkers and surrogate outcome measures, respectively as well as the available frameworks and challenges in the assessment of the validity of serum urate as a surrogate in gout (i.e. a reasonable replacement for gout symptoms).

The significance of serum 14-3-3η level in rheumatoid arthritis patients

BACKGROUND

RA is a systemic inflammatory condition characterized by chronic arthritis and often associated with irreversible joint damage.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the significance of serum level of 14-3-3η in RA and its association with clinical and serological features of the disease.

METHODS

This is a case-control study done on 80 participants. They were divided into 2 groups. Group 1: 40 rheumatoid arthritis patients compared to group 2: 40 healthy participants matched for age and sex. Laboratory investigations including complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs), and serum 14-3-3η were done to all participants. Radiological examination in the form of plain X-ray for hands and feet was done to all patients.

RESULTS

Serum levels of 14-3-3η were significantly higher in RA patients compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Serum 14-3-3η was the only predictor of high Larsen's score (p = 0.013) on using linear regression analysis. Serum 14-3-3η can predict RA in healthy controls in univariate (p = 0.001) and multivariate (p = 0.004) analyses. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 14-3-3η was constructed for discrimination between RA and control subjects. The best cut-off value was 61.9 ng/mL, with fair AUC (0.773, p < 0.001), 95% CI (0.656-0.889), and the sensitivity and specificity of 14-3-3η for RA diagnosis as 65% and 95% respectively. Also, we constructed ROC curves for RF, ACPA, 14-3-3η, and their combinations; we found that the highest test sensitivity of 95.7% appeared on adding the 3 markers together, and the highest test specificity of 100% was detected on adding RF to ACPA, 14-3-3η to ACPA or the 3 molecules together.

CONCLUSION

14-3-3η could be a valuable marker for the diagnosis of RA patients and it may have prognostic value. Key Points • 14-3-3η is a valuable marker for the diagnosis of RA patients. • 14-3-3η reflects disease severity and joint damage in RA patients.

Outcomes and Findings of the International Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) BIODAM Cohort for Validation of Soluble Biomarkers in RA

OBJECTIVE

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Soluble Biomarker Working Group initiated an international, multicenter, prospective study, the Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) BIODAM cohort, to generate resources for the clinical validation of candidate biomarkers predictive of radiographic progression. This first report describes the cohort, clinical outcomes, and radiographic findings.

METHODS

Patients with RA from 38 sites in 10 countries starting or changing conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or starting tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were followed for 2 years. Participating physicians were required to adhere to a treat-to-target strategy. Biosamples (serum, urine) were acquired every 3 months, radiography of hands and feet every 6 months, and ultrasound of hands and feet every 3 months in a subset. Primary endpoint was radiographic progression by the Sharp/van der Heijde score.

RESULTS

A total of 571 patients were recruited and 439 (76.9%) completed 2-year followup. At baseline, the majority was female (76%), mean age 55.7 years, and mean disease duration 6.5 years. Patients had a mean of 8.4 swollen and 13.6 tender joints, 44-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS44) 3.8, 77.7% rheumatoid factor-positive or anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive. Percentage of patients in DAS and American College of Rheumatology remission at 2 years was 52.2% and 27.1%, respectively. Percentage of patients with radiographic progression (> 0.5) at 1 and 2 years was 38.2% and 59.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The RA BIODAM prospective study succeeded in generating an extensive list of clinical, imaging (2343 radiographs), and biosample (4638 sera) resources that will be made available to expedite the identification and validation of biomarkers for radiographic damage endpoints. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01476956, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01476956).

Adherence to Treat-to-target Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Associated Factors: Data from the International RA BIODAM Cohort

Objective.

Compelling evidence supports a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy for optimal outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is limited knowledge regarding the factors that impede implementation of T2T, particularly in a setting where adherence to T2T is protocol-specified. We aimed to assess clinical factors that associate with failure to adhere to T2T.

Methods.

Patients with RA from 10 countries who were starting or changing conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or starting tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were followed for 2 years. Participating physicians were required per protocol to adhere to the T2T strategy. Factors influencing adherence to T2T low disease activity (T2T-LDA; 44-joint count Disease Activity Score ≤ 2.4) were analyzed in 2 types of binomial generalized estimating equations models: (1) including only baseline features (baseline model); and (2) modeling variables that inherently vary over time as such (longitudinal model).

Results.

A total of 571 patients were recruited and 439 (76.9%) completed 2-year followup. Failure of adherence to T2T-LDA was noted in 1765 visits (40.5%). In the baseline multivariable model, a high number of comorbidities (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.19), smoking (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08–1.63) and high number of tender joints (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02–1.04) were independently associated with failure to implement T2T, while anticitrullinated protein antibody/rheumatoid factor positivity (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50–0.80) was a significant facilitator of T2T. Results were similar in the longitudinal model.

Conclusion.

Lack of adherence to T2T in the RA BIODAM cohort was evident in a substantial proportion despite being a protocol requirement, and this could be predicted by clinical features. [Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) BIODAM cohort; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01476956].

Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis, Disease Activity, Prognosis, and Prediction of Response to Therapy

There exists a major unmet need for biomarkers that can identify axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) early after disease onset because of the availability of highly effective therapies. Several recent reports have examined the autoantibody response in patients with axSpA through the use of protein microarrays and protein-protein interactions although diagnostic performance of biomarkers identified to date has been inadequate. An example of such a biomarker is protein phosphatase magnesium-dependent 1A. Antibodies to the human leukocyte antigen class II-associated invariant chain peptide (anti-CD74) are candidate diagnostic biomarkers but sensitivity declines with increasing duration of disease. Metabolomic studies have employed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometry to identify disease-specific metabolites related to fat metabolism and intestinal microbial metabolism. A second major unmet need exists for biomarkers of disease activity that have superiority over standard C-reactive protein assessment and reflect MRI inflammation in the axial spine. Several biomarkers reflecting inflammation (calprotectin), angiogenesis (vasoactive endothelial growth factor), and connective tissue turnover (C2M, C3M, and citrullinated metalloproteinase degraded fragment of vimentin) have recently been shown to reflect disease activity when compared with clinical outcomes but comparisons with MRI inflammation are very limited. With increasing availability of highly effective but costly therapies, a third unmet need is biomarkers that can predict response to therapies with different mechanisms of action and are superior to C-reactive protein. Calprotectin is currently the only candidate. Although there are as yet no proven therapies for preventing progression of disease there is an unmet need for biomarkers of prognosis that are more responsive than radiography. Aside from CRP no consistent candidates have emerged. Future studies will need to be prospective, include consecutive patients presenting with undiagnosed back pain, and use more reliable and objective endpoints such as MRI inflammation. Moreover, it has become evident that targeted biomarker studies have not been successful in identifying clinically useful biomarkers and technologies that can simultaneously assess “multiomic” markers will need to be analyzed for future advances. These include more sophisticated metabolomic profiling and universal metabolome-standard (UMS) methodology, next generation RNA sequencing, and affinity-based quantitative proteomics based on the use of nucleic acid binders such as the aptamer-based SOMAscan assay.

Elevated serum 14-3-3η protein may be helpful for diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis associated with secondary osteoporosis in Chinese population

Osteoporosis (OP) is one of the signs of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The 14-3-3η protein is an inflammatory protein, which has been reported to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This is to determine the serum levels of 14-3-3η protein, evaluate its diagnostic value in early RA, and clear out its significance in RA with secondary osteoporosis. Two hundred fifty-nine RA patients and 80 age and sex-matched healthy controls were included. Assays of serum 14-3-3η protein were done for all participants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to measure bone mineral density (BMD). Serum 14-3-3η protein level was significantly high in RA (2.49/4.72), compared with controls (P < 0.0001). Positive rate of 14-3-3η protein in RA was 97.3%, which was higher than that in controls (χ ² = 276.641, P < 0.0001). Serum 14-3-3η protein level in early RA was significantly higher than that in established RA (3.91/4.82 vs 2.01/3.29, Z = 2.624, P < 0.05). The positive rate among three groups (normal control, early RA group, established RA group) differed from each other (χ ² = 131.396, P < 0.0001). Results of ROC curve indicated the cutoff point of 14-3-3η protein for diagnosis of early RA was 0.879 ng/ml (P < 0.0001). Linear correlation analysis found that serum 14-3-3η protein positively correlated with VAS and HAQ (P < 0.0001), negatively correlated with BMD at lumbar spine and femur in RA (P < 0.0001). Serum 14-3-3η protein among groups of bone mass normal (2.73/3.79), osteopenia (3.15/4.86), and osteoporosis (6.34/6.42) was different in early RA patients (χ ² = 7.974, P < 0.05). Serum 14-3-3η protein levels increase significantly in patients with RA (especially in early RA). There are close relationships between serum 14-3-3η protein and clinical symptoms and osteoporosis in patients with RA.

Using serum urate as a validated surrogate end point for flares in patients with gout: protocol for a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

INTRODUCTION

Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in men over 40 years of age. Long-term urate-lowering therapy is considered a key strategy for effective gout management. The primary outcome measure for efficacy in clinical trials of urate-lowering therapy is serum urate levels, effectively acting as a surrogate for patient-centred outcomes such as frequency of gout attacks or pain. Yet it is not clearly demonstrated that the strength of the relationship between serum urate and clinically relevant outcomes is sufficiently strong for serum urate to be considered an adequate surrogate. Our objective is to investigate the strength of the relationship between changes in serum urate in randomised controlled trials and changes in clinically relevant outcomes according to the 'Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema version 3' (BSES3), documenting the validity of selected instruments by applying the 'OMERACT Filter 2.0'.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review described in terms of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines will identify all relevant studies. Standardised data elements will be extracted from each study by 2 independent reviewers and disagreements are resolved by discussion. The data will be analysed by meta-regression of the between-arm differences in the change in serum urate level (independent variable) from baseline to 3 months (or 6 and 12 months if 3-month values are not available) against flare rate, tophus size and number and pain at the final study visit (dependent variables).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will not require specific ethics approval since it is based on analysis of published (aggregated) data. The intended audience will include healthcare researchers, policymakers and clinicians. Results of the study will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016026991.

A prospective cohort study of 14-3-3η in ACPA and/or RF-positive patients with arthralgia

Background

14-3-3η (eta) is a novel serum/plasma protein biomarker involved in the upregulation of inflammatory and joint damage factors. We analysed the association of 14-3-3η with the development of clinically apparent arthritis in a cohort of subjects with arthralgia and positivity for at least one serologic marker: rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA).

Methods

Measurement of 14-3-3η in plasma collected on entry into the cohort. For this study, 144 subjects with a minimum of 2.5 (median and maximum 5) years of follow-up were available. The relationship between presence and levels of 14-3-3η and development of arthritis was investigated.

Results

Arthritis occurred in 43 (30 %) of the 144 subjects after a median of 15 months. 14-3-3η was detectable up to 5 years before onset of clinical arthritis and was present significantly more often (36 % versus 14 %; relative risk 2.5, 95 % confidence interval 1.2–5.6; p = 0.02) and at significantly higher levels (median 0.95 versus 0.28 ng/ml; p = 0.02) in subjects developing arthritis compared with those who did not. 14-3-3η levels/positivity and ACPA, but not RF, were univariately associated with the development of arthritis while generalized linear model analysis with RF and ACPA as obligatory factors could not return an incremental benefit with 14-3-3η.

Conclusions

14-3-3η was detectable prior to the onset of arthritis and was associated with arthritis development in arthralgia subjects pre-selected for positivity of RF or ACPA. Its power to predict onset of arthritis independent of ACPA and RF requires a new study in which patients are not pre-selected based on ACPA and/or RF seropositivity.

Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the literature for biomarker validation studies that address key unmet needs related to the evaluation and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). This review focused on biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis and reflecting disease activity, structural damage on radiography, and clinical response to major therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early diagnosis may be facilitated by measurement of antibodies to the human leukocyte antigen class II-associated invariant chain peptide (anti-CD74) but sensitivity declines with increasing duration of disease. No disease activity biomarkers have demonstrated consistent superiority over standard C-reactive protein (CRP), and future validation should employ multivariate analysis aimed at demonstrating the added value of any associated biomarkers beyond available clinical parameters of disease activity and the use of magnetic resonance imaging inflammation as the primary endpoint. Several biomarkers reflecting inflammation (CRP and calprotectin), angiogenesis (vasoactive endothelial growth factor), and connective tissue turnover (C2 M, C3 M, and citrullinated metalloproteinase degraded fragment of vimentin ) have recently been shown to reflect radiographic progression in multivariate studies adjusted for baseline severity. Future studies should be prospective and demonstrate that predictive capacity adds to the information provided by known predictors such as CRP and baseline modified Stoke AS Spine Score. Calprotectin is a promising predictor of response to major therapies for axial SpA.

SUMMARY

Several promising biomarkers addressing major unmet clinical needs require further validation in prospective studies.

Serum 14-3-3η is a Novel Marker that Complements Current Serological Measurements to Enhance Detection of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective.

Serum 14-3-3η is a novel joint-derived proinflammatory mediator implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In our study, we assessed the diagnostic utility of 14-3-3η and its association with standard clinical and serological measures.

Methods.

A quantitative ELISA was used to assess 14-3-3η levels. Early (n = 99) and established patients with RA (n = 135) were compared to all controls (n = 385), including healthy subjects (n = 189). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 14-3-3η, and the likelihood ratios (LR) for RA were determined through receiver-operator curve analysis. The incremental value of adding 14-3-3η to anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) in diagnosing early and established RA was assessed.

Results.

Serum 14-3-3η differentiated established patients with RA from healthy individuals and all controls (p < 0.0001). A serum 14-3-3η cutoff of ≥ 0.19 ng/ml delivered a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 93%, respectively, with corresponding LR positivity of 10.4. At this cutoff in early RA, 64% of patients with early RA were positive for 14-3-3η, with a corresponding specificity of 93% (LR+ of 8.6), while 59% and 57% were positive for ACPA or RF, respectively. When ACPA, RF, and 14-3-3η positivity were used in combination, 77 of the 99 patients (78%) with early RA were positive for any 1 of the 3 markers. Serum 14-3-3η did not correlate with C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or Disease Activity Score, but patients who were 14-3-3η-positive had significantly worse disease.

Conclusion.

Serum 14-3-3η is a novel RA mechanistic marker that is highly specific, associated with worse disease, and complements current markers, enabling a more accurate diagnosis of RA.

Higher bone turnover is related to spinal radiographic damage and low bone mineral density in ankylosing spondylitis patients with active disease: a cross-sectional analysis

Introduction

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is characterized by excessive bone formation and bone loss. Our aim was to investigate the association of bone turnover markers (BTM) with spinal radiographic damage and bone mineral density (BMD) in AS patients with active disease.

Methods

201 consecutive AS outpatients of the Groningen Leeuwarden AS (GLAS) cohort were included. Serum markers of bone resorption (C-telopeptides of type-I collagen, sCTX) and bone formation (procollagen type-I N-terminal peptide, PINP; bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, BALP) were measured. Z-scores were used to correct for the normal influence that age and gender have on bone turnover. Radiographs were scored by two independent readers according to modified Stoke AS Spinal Score (mSASSS). The presence of complete bridging (ankylosis of at least two vertebrae) was considered as measure of more advanced radiographic damage. Low BMD was defined as lumbar spine and/or hip BMD Z-score ≤ −1.

Results

Of the 151 patients with complete data, 52 (34%) had ≥1 complete bridge, 49 (33%) had ≥1 syndesmophyte (non-bridging), and 50 (33%) had no syndesmophytes. 66 (44%) had low BMD. Patients with bridging had significantly higher sCTX and PINP Z-scores than patients without bridging (0.43 vs. −0.55 and 0.55 vs. 0.04, respectively). Patients with low BMD had significantly higher sCTX Z-score than patients with normal BMD (−0.08 vs. −0.61). After correcting for gender, symptom duration, and CRP, sCTX Z-score remained significantly related to the presence of low BMD alone (OR: 1.60), bridging alone (OR: 1.82), and bridging in combination with low BMD (OR: 2.26).

Conclusions

This cross-sectional study in AS patients with active and relatively long-standing disease demonstrated that higher serum levels of sCTX, and to a lesser extent PINP, are associated with the presence of complete bridging. sCTX was also associated with low BMD. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm that serum levels of sCTX can serve as objective marker for bone-related outcome in AS.

14-3-3η is a novel mediator associated with the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis and joint damage

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate whether 14-3-3η, a specific isoform of a family of proteins regulating processes such as cellular signalling, activates cell-signalling pathways and induces factors known to contribute to the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We also investigated whether 14-3-3η is associated with more severe disease in both early and established RA.

Methods

We investigated the effect of 14-3-3η on the activation of RA-relevant signalling cascades and induction of proinflammatory mediators that contribute to the joint damage process. 14-3-3η titres from 33 patients with early RA (mean RA duration = 1.8 months) and from 40 patients with established RA were measured in serum drawn at the 3-year time point of the Behandel Strategieën study. The relationship between 14-3-3η titres and standard clinical variables was investigated by correlation analysis. The association with radiographic damage and radiographic progression over at least a 2-year period was investigated using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results

14-3-3η activated selected members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, mainly extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 and c-Jun kinase, but not p38MAPK. Activation by 14-3-3η, using levels spanning the concentration range found in RA patient serum, resulted in the induction of inflammatory transcripts such as interleukin 1 (IL-1) and IL-6 and factors linked to the joint damage process, such as receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and matrix metalloproteinase 1. Serum 14-3-3η correlated significantly with rheumatoid factor (RF) (r = 0.43) and anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) (r = 0.31) in the early RA cohort, but not with C-reactive protein (CRP) or the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints in either cohort. Serum 14-3-3η concentrations were significantly higher in patients with radiographically assessed joint damage and in those who had radiographic progression. By multivariate analysis, we show that 14-3-3η complemented markers such as CRP, RF and ACPA in informing RA radiographic status and/or progression.

Conclusions

Extracellular 14-3-3η activates key signalling cascades and induces factors associated with the pathogenesis of RA at concentrations found in patients with RA, and its expression is higher in patients with radiographic damage and RA progression.

Updating the OMERACT filter: implications for imaging and soluble biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides a framework for the validation of outcome measures for use in rheumatology clinical research. However, imaging and biochemical measures may face additional validation challenges because of their technical nature. The Imaging and Soluble Biomarker Session at OMERACT 11 aimed to provide a guide for the iterative development of an imaging or biochemical measurement instrument so it can be used in therapeutic assessment.

METHODS

A hierarchical structure was proposed, reflecting 3 dimensions needed for validating an imaging or biochemical measurement instrument: outcome domain(s), study setting, and performance of the instrument. Movement along the axes in any dimension reflects increasing validation. For a given test instrument, the 3-axis structure assesses the extent to which the instrument is a validated measure for the chosen domain, whether it assesses a patient-centered or disease-centered variable, and whether its technical performance is adequate in the context of its application. Some currently used imaging and soluble biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and knee osteoarthritis were then evaluated using the original OMERACT Filter and the newly proposed structure. Breakout groups critically reviewed the extent to which the candidate biomarkers complied with the proposed stepwise approach, as a way of examining the utility of the proposed 3-dimensional structure.

RESULTS

Although there was a broad acceptance of the value of the proposed structure in general, some areas for improvement were suggested including clarification of criteria for achieving a certain level of validation and how to deal with extension of the structure to areas beyond clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

General support was obtained for a proposed tri-axis structure to assess validation of imaging and soluble biomarkers; nevertheless, additional work is required to better evaluate its place within the OMERACT Filter 2.0.

Repeating tests: different roles in research studies and clinical medicine

Researchers often decide whether to average multiple results in order to produce more precise data, and clinicians often decide whether to repeat a laboratory test in order to confirm its validity or to follow a trend. Some of the major sources of variation in laboratory tests (analytical imprecision, within-subject biological variation and between-subject variation) and the effects of averaging multiple results from the same sample or from the same person over time are discussed quantitatively in this article. This analysis leads to the surprising conclusion that the strategy of averaging multiple results is only necessary and effective in a limited range of research studies. In clinical practice, it may be important to repeat a test in order to eliminate the possibility of a rare type of error that has nothing to do analytical imprecision or within-subject variation, and for this reason, paradoxically, it may be most important to repeat tests with the highest sensitivity and/or specificity (i.e., ones that are critical for clinical decision-making).

Circulating protein fragments of cartilage and connective tissue degradation are diagnostic and prognostic markers of rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis

Inflammation driven connective tissue turnover is key in rheumatic diseases, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Few biomarkers are available for measuring disease prognosis or the efficacy of interventions applied in these tissue-related conditions. Type II collagen is the primary structural protein of cartilage and type III collagen of connective tissues, and obvious targets for the collagenalytic, which increase during tissue inflammation. The objective of the study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic utility of cartilage, C2M, and synovial, C3M, turnover biomarkers in AS. Serum samples were retrieved from patients suffering from AS (n = 103), RA (n = 47) and healthy controls (n = 56). AS progressors were defined as having new vertebral syndesmophytes or more that 3 unit change in mSASSS over a two-year period. Type II collagen degradation markers in serum were measured by the C2M ELISA, and type III collagen degradation by the C3M ELISA. Logistic regression and dichotomized decision tree were used to analyze the prognostic value of the markers individually or in combination. Both C2M and C3M levels were significantly higher in RA patients than in healthy controls (p<0.0001). Diagnostic utility was analyzed by ROC and areas under the curve (AUCs) were 72% and 89% for C2M and C3M, respectively. Both C2M and C3M, were significantly higher in serum samples from AS patient than from healthy controls (p<0.0001). The AUCs of C2M and C3M, respectively, were 70% and 81% for AS. A combination of C2M and C3M, dichotomized according to best cut-offs for individual markers, could correctly identify 80% of the progressors and 61% of the non-progressors. The present study is the first to show that specific biomarkers of cartilage and connective tissue degradation facilitate both diagnosis and prediction of progression of RA and AS.

Serum urate in chronic gout--will it be the first validated soluble biomarker in rheumatology?

OBJECTIVE

To summarize evidence for and endorsement of serum urate (SU) as having fulfilled the OMERACT filter as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout at the 2010 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Meeting (OMERACT 10).

METHODS

Data were presented to support the use of SU as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout and specifically the ability to utilize it to predict future patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

SU was accepted as having fulfilled the OMERACT filter by 78% of voters. However, consensus was not obtained regarding its use as a soluble biomarker in chronic gout. Although the majority of the criteria for a soluble biomarker were fulfilled, the key criterion of association of the biomarker with outcomes was not agreed upon. It was agreed that the appropriate choice of endpoint must be linked to its clinical importance to the individual with the disorder and its temporal relationship to the intervention. Appropriate outcomes in chronic gout may therefore include gout flares, reduction in tophi, and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

SU is a critical outcome measure. It has the potential to fulfil criteria for a soluble biomarker. Further analyses of existing data from randomized controlled trials will be required to determine whether SU can predict future important outcomes, in particular disability.

Validation of new biomarkers in systemic autoimmune diseases

Biomarkers have an important influence on the clinical decision-making processes involved in diagnosis, assessment of disease activity, allocation of treatment, and determining prognosis. The clinical usefulness of a biomarker is dependant on demonstration of its validity. Ideally, biomarkers should provide information not available from currently available tests and should be tested as they would be used in clinical practice; however, potential biomarkers could be affected by many different clinical or patient variables-such as disease activity, therapeutic intervention, or the presence of comorbidities--and validation studies might not include all the design features that are required to ensure that the biomarker is a true measure of the clinical process it is intended to reflect. In this Review, we appraise studies that have been conducted to validate six promising new biomarkers for diagnosis, disease activity assessment, or prognosis in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. We discuss the validity of these six biomarkers with particular reference to the features of the studies that lend weight to or distract from their findings. The intent of this discussion is to draw attention to elements of validation study design that should be considered when evaluating the robustness of a biomarker, which differ according to the marker's intended use.

Identification of CXCL13 as a marker for rheumatoid arthritis outcome using an in silico model of the rheumatic joint

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by inflammation and joint destruction, with the degree of damage varying greatly among patients. Prediction of disease severity using known clinical and serologic risk factors is inaccurate. This study was undertaken to identify new serologic markers for RA severity using an in silico model of the rheumatic joint.

METHODS

An in silico model of a prototypical rheumatic joint was used to predict candidate markers associated with erosiveness. The following 4 markers were chosen for validation: tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP-5b), N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), angiopoietin 2 (Ang-2), and CXCL13. Serum from 74 RA patients was used to study whether radiologic joint destruction (total erosion score and total Sharp/van der Heijde score [SHS]) after 4 years of disease was associated with serum levels at the time of diagnosis. Serum marker levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. For confirmation, baseline serum levels were analyzed for an association with progression of joint damage over 7 years of followup in a cohort of 155 patients with early RA.

RESULTS

Comparison of high and low quartiles of erosion score and SHS at 4 years showed a difference in baseline serum CXCL13 level (P = 0.011 and P = 0.018, respectively). In the confirmation cohort, elevated baseline CXCL13 levels were associated with increased rates of joint destruction during 7 years of followup (P < 0.001 unadjusted and P ≤ 0.004 with adjustment for C-reactive protein level). Analyzing anti-CCP-2-positive and anti-CCP-2–negative RA separately yielded a significant result only in the anti-CCP-2-negative group (P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that CXCL13 is a novel serologic marker predictive of RA severity.This marker was identified with the help of an in silicomodel of the RA joint.

Soluble and tissue biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis

The study of biomarkers has become a very important field of research in spondyloarthropathy. Biomarkers are useful for different aspects of the disease such as diagnosis, assessment of disease activity and outcome, including damage. The most commonly used biomarkers in spondyloarthropathies are HLA-B27 for diagnosis and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) for disease activity. HLA-B27 is very sensitive but has a low specificity. ESR and CRP have both low sensitivity and specificity. The introduction of new and very expensive therapies is another reason for analysis of biomarkers. Clinicians need tools to predict more accurately disease activity, disease progression and response to therapy. This article focusses on the several known and new biomarkers of promise, including markers for cartilage and bone damage, and discusses some of the problems encountered during the search and development of new biomarkers. Biomarkers, soluble and tissue-related, reflecting structural damage and disease activity, constitute a high priority for the drug discovery process and the understanding of the pathogenesis of a particular disease. The identification of relevant tools to evaluate the natural course, disease activity, treatment response and outcome of ankylosing spondylitis is of increasing relevance since the raised awareness and development of new therapeutic options. Until now these different aspects are monitored by artificial patient-centred or physician-centred constructs. Very often, their approach is indirect and is not free from disease-unrelated influences. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Soluble Biomarker Working Group has taken several major steps towards the development and implementation of such assessment methods. The major drawback is that these tools do not directly reflect biological and pathological processes. Serological biomarkers objectively measure different aspects of the biological and pathological process and may contribute to a major advance in the assessments of patients. The ultimate goal is the use of biomarkers in a personalised approach for disease management in clinical practice.

Psoriatic arthritis: pharmacotherapy update

Psoriatic arthritis is a systemic disorder that causes chronic pain, altered physical appearance, and loss of function. The clinical features are diverse, but the core manifestations are psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, and dactylitis. Our understanding about the psoriatic arthritis disease state, assessment, and treatment has advanced thanks to significant collaborative efforts by rheumatologists and dermatologists in the development of classification criteria, outcome measures to assess the various clinical domains, and treatment trials with agents also used for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. In particular, biologic agents, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, have demonstrated significant efficacy and reasonable safety in all clinical domains of the disease, resulting in amelioration of clinical symptoms, inhibition of structural damage, and improvement in function and quality of life.

Circulating mediators of bone remodeling in psoriatic arthritis: implications for disordered osteoclastogenesis and bone erosion

Introduction

Diverse bone pathologies are observed in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Uncoupling of bone remodeling with disordered osteoclastogenesis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of PsA. The aim of this study was to examine the role of soluble mediators of bone remodeling within the circulation of patients with PsA.

Methods

Patients with PsA (n = 38), with psoriasis (n = 10), and healthy controls (n = 12) were studied. Serum was obtained for testing of Dikkopf-1 (Dkk-1), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) with ELISA. Patients with PsA also had bone densitometry, plain radiographs of the hands and feet, and assessment of peripheral blood osteoclast precursors. Radiographs were scored for erosion, joint-space narrowing, osteolysis, and new bone formation.

Results

Compared with those with psoriasis and healthy controls, patients with PsA had higher circulating concentrations of Dkk-1 and M-CSF. In patients with PsA, M-CSF and RANKL, but not Dkk-1, concentrations positively correlated with radiographic erosion, joint-space narrowing, and osteolysis scores. Mediators of bone remodeling did not correlate with the number of joints with new bone formation or with total hip-bone mineral density. Peripheral blood CD14⁺/CD11b⁺ cells, and the number of osteoclast-like cells and resorptive pits after culture with RANKL and M-CSF also correlated with radiographic damage scores. Circulating M-CSF concentrations correlated with the percentage of peripheral blood CD14⁺/CD11b⁺ cells.

Conclusions

Systemic expression of soluble factors that promote osteoclastogenesis is disordered in patients with PsA and may contribute to periarticular bone loss in this disease.

Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) in systemic necrotizing vasculitis

The continuing morbidity of patients with vasculitis, despite the improved prognosis with aggressive therapy, underlines the need for accurate disease assessment. We have devised a clinical index of disease activity, and evaluated its use in several forms of necrotizing vasculitis. The weighted score is based on symptoms and signs in nine separate organ systems. Disease features are only scored if they are attributable to active vasculitis. The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was compared with two other published vasculitis activity scores, with the physician's global assessment (PGA), with outcome, and with serological markers of disease activity. In a cross-sectional study of 213 consecutive patients with different forms of vasculitis, all 107 vasculitis patients who were judged completely well on clinical assessment had a BVAS score of 0. Twenty-two patients with active vasculitis prior to treatment had a median score of 7.5 (range 4-30) and 69 with active disease on treatment had a median score of 10 (1-29). Of the 12 who died, median score immediately prior to death was 20.5 (9-30). In a serial prospective study, 30 cases had documented episodes of active disease. During periods of disease activity, the median BVAS values were significantly higher than in remission (15 [range 3-32] vs. 0 [0-2], p < 0.001); the same was true for CRP values (80 [9-361] vs. 13.5 [5-68], p < 0.001). This was not true for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), haemoglobin (Hb) or von Willebrand factor (VWF).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)