Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriatic Disease, or Psoriatic Syndrome?

Psoriatic Arthritis Acceptable Symptoms State: Does Sex Make a Difference?

INTRODUCTION

The Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) is a validated instrument that is used to assess whether a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) accepts her/his disease status by asking them a simple question: "Think about all the ways your PsA has affected you during the last 48 h. If you were to remain in the next few months as you were during the last 48 h, would this be acceptable to you?" The aim of the present study was to explore any PASS differences in patients with PsA based on sex by looking at the corresponding thresholds of Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of the Disease-12 (PsAID-12) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) in female and male patients.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study that included two PsA cohorts. To identify the DAPSA, PsAID and HAQ-DI thresholds that differentiated patients who reported "yes" in response to the PASS question from those who reported "no," we used the receiver operating characteristic curves both for the female and male sexes. Moreover, Cohen's kappa test was used to determine the agreement of a PASS "yes" with DAPSA ≤ 14, PsAID ≤ 4 and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5.

RESULTS

Three-hundred ten patients were considered for the study. The DAPSA, PsAID-12 and HAQ-DI thresholds that differentiated PASS "yes" patients from PASS "no" patients were 11.7, 1.85 and 0.625 in male patients and 13.3, 3.85 and 0.750 in female patients, respectively. A PASS "yes" and DAPSA ≤ 14 showed moderate agreement in males (kappa = 0.56) and good agreement in females (kappa = 0.80); the agreement between a PASS "yes" and PsAID ≤ 4 and between a PASS "yes" and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 was higher in female patients (moderate).

CONCLUSION

Female patients accept their disease at higher DAPSA, PsAID and HAQ-DI values than male patients do. The clinical meaning of this could be that a female patient generally has a greater global disease acceptance inclination. Therefore, this study further supports the concept that sex differences are present in patients with PsA.

Clinical Characteristics of "Severe" Peripheral Psoriatic Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of a Longitudinal Cohort

INTRODUCTION

The concept of severity in a multidomain disease such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still not well defined. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with severe peripheral PsA.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PsA were collected at baseline and at last follow-up. We defined the severe population using the modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI); which excludes ankylosing spondylitis quality of life scale). Hence, patients with a score of 3 in at least one domain were defined as having severe PsA. Clinical characteristics of patients fulfilling the definition of severe PsA were compared to those non-severe.

RESULTS

We evaluated 177 patients with peripheral PsA (M/F: 98/76). Of these, 64 (36.1%) were identified as severe according to the mCPDAI criteria, at baseline. Eighteen patients (10.1%) at last follow-up still met the definition of severe PsA. At last follow-up visit, severe patients with PsA were only males (18/18, P < 0.01) and have worse outcomes in terms of disease activity, pain, function, and impact of disease. Male sex and the severity of skin involvement at baseline were factors associated with the presence of severe PsA. The agreement between the presence of severe PsA and the absence of minimal disease activity was slight [Cohen's k: 0.174 (0.084-0.264)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that severe patients with PsA had more disease activity, pain, and impact of disease than non-severe patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that severity and disease activity are not interchangeable concepts.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Composite Indices of Remission in Male and Female Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Longitudinal Cohorts

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the sex differences in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio of the outcome indices minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) with respect to clinical remission, evaluated from both the physician and patient perspective, in a multicenter cohort of patients with PsA.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts, all patients with PsA consecutively attending our rheumatology units were considered potentially eligible for the study. In all patients, a complete clinical examination was carried out. The DAPSA was calculated for each patient (DAPSA values ≤ 4 were considered as remission) and MDA was also evaluated. Patient and physician global assessment values ≤ 1 were considered as a surrogate of remission from the patient and physician perspective, respectively.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two patients with PsA were enrolled (mean age 55.7 [SD 12.4]; 141 male, 131 female). In both sexes, MDA had good sensitivity and specificity toward remission as assessed by the rheumatologist. Remission according to DAPSA had excellent values of specificity but lacks sensitivity in both sexes. PsAID ≤ 4 had excellent values of sensitivity but lacked specificity in both sexes. Remission defined by DAPSA values was found to be more sensitive and specific in female patients (45.4% and 100%, respectively) than in male patients (33.3% and 84.2%, respectively) with respect to physician-judged remission.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that some differences between the 2 sexes on the different outcome indices are possible. This could be important in the clinical management of patients with PsA.

Identification of the Minimal Disease Activity Domains Achieved Based on Different Treatments in Psoriatic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work is to characterize which Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) domains are mainly achieved, based on different treatments, in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Moreover, the association between MDA achievement and the different treatment groups was assessed.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of two longitudinal PsA groups. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, PsA diagnosis, stable treatment for at least 6 months. Patients were grouped depending on the therapy: group 1: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)/cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (COX2i)/steroids, group 2: conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs), group 3: Tumor Necrosis Factor α  inhibitors (TNFi), group 4: interleukin inhibitors (IL)12-23i or IL-23i, group 5: IL-17i, group 6: phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PD4i). For each group, the achieved domains based on therapy were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the treatment groups and the MDA achievement.

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were enrolled, and MDA was achieved in 45.8% of them. In all treatment groups, the first MDA domains achieved were: body surface area ≤ 3, swollen joint count ≤ 1 and Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1, while MDA domains less frequently achieved were Patient Global Assessment (PtgA) ≤ 2 cm and pain on visual analogue scale ≤ 1.5 cm. The logistic regression analysis showed higher odds ratios for the achievement of the MDA in those patients in groups 3 and 4.

CONCLUSIONS

In each treatment group, MDA domains less frequently achieved were PtGA and pain, suggesting that "patient-driven domains" are still an unmet need. Due to the study design and the low number of patients in some groups, it is not possible to clearly define which MDA domain was achieved or not based on treatment; however, it seems that some differences could be present. If larger and prospective studies confirm our preliminary results, we could move toward a personalized/domain treatment approach in PsA.

Difficult to Treat and Refractory to Treatment in Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex and chronic inflammatory condition in which the achievement of the best possible disease control has been proposed as the treatment target, which includes the possibility of reaching remission in all disease domains. However, due to the complexity of this multidomain disease, some patients may still have high disease activity in one or more domain and a high burden of disease, potentially leading to various treatment changes and to difficulty with the overall management. In this paper, we overview the concept of patients with difficult-to-treat PsA and the concept of patients with refractory-to-treatment PsA by providing a distinction between these two concepts and the possible implication for the management of patients with PsA.

The Conundrum of Psoriatic Arthritis: a Pathogenetic and Clinical Pattern at the Midpoint of Autoinflammation and Autoimmunity

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by psoriasis, synovitis, enthesitis, spondylitis, and the possible association with other extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities. It is a multifaceted and systemic disorder sustained by complex pathogenesis, combining aspects of autoinflammation and autoimmunity. Features of PsA autoinflammation include the role of biomechanical stress in the onset and/or exacerbation of the disease; the evidence of involvement of the innate immune response mediators in the skin, peripheral blood and synovial tissue; an equal gender distribution; the clinical course which may encounter periods of prolonged remission and overlapping features with autoinflammatory syndromes. Conversely, the role of autoimmunity is evoked by the association with class I major histocompatibility complex alleles, the polyarticular pattern of the disease which sometimes resembles rheumatoid arthritis and the presence of serum autoantibodies. Genetics also provide important insights into the pathogenesis of PsA, particularly related to class I HLA being associated with psoriasis and PsA. In this review, we provide a comprehensive review of the pathogenesis, genetics and clinical features of PsA that endorse the mixed nature of a disorder at the crossroads of autoinflammation and autoimmunity.

Triple jump for the optimal management of psoriatic arthritis: diet, sleep and exercise - a review

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex, multiform and chronic inflammatory disease characterised by the association of arthritis and psoriasis combined with other related conditions and comorbidities. Treatment of PsA has rapidly evolved by the introduction of new biological drugs and small molecules which allow to achieve disease remission or low disease activity in most of the patients. However, unmet treatment needs still persist for those patients with persistent disease activity or symptoms, impaired function, reduced quality of life or comorbidities. In this context, non-pharmacological approaches, including diet modifications, an adequate sleep quality and physical activity could provide additional benefits. In recent years, diet modifications, improvement of sleep quality and physical activity became an area of interest for researchers and some studies showed how a holistic non-pharmacological approach may ameliorate the quality of life of patients with PsA.The aim of this manuscript was to review the current evidence on the intriguing link and potential effects of diet, sleep and exercise in PsA patients. In particular, we reviewed the literature focusing on the possible benefits of a holistic approach to PsA patients considering lifestyle modifications.

Cytokine profile characterization of naïve patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: implications for a pathogenic disease continuum

Background

The idea of psoriatic disease continuum has been progressively prompted based on the advances of the knowledge about the pathogenic steps underpinning the occurrence of psoriasis (PSO) and psoriatic arthritis (PSA). To evaluate biomolecules (inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory chemokines, cell adhesion and cellular mediators) in naïve patients with PSO, PSA with PSO, and PSA sine PSO. To stratify the results considering the presence of psoriatic nail involvement, extensive skin disease and obesity evaluating all involved patients.

Methods

By multiplex technology, 20 serum biomolecules were assessed with the inclusion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-23, TNF), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-α, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13), inflammatory chemokines (IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β), cell adhesion and cellular mediators (ICAM-1, E-selectin, P-selectin). The assessment of possible statistical differences between the means of the three groups was performed by One-Way ANOVA. In addition, by non-parametric T-tests, we stratified the results according to selected clinical characteristics (psoriatic nail involvement, PASI ≥ 10, BMI ≥ 30).

Results

In 80 assessed naïve patients, patients with PSO showed significant increases of E-selectin (p=0.021) and IL-8 (0.041) than other groups. In patients with PSA with PSO, significant higher levels of ICAM-1 were observed (p=0.009) than other groups. We did not observe further differences comparing pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory chemokines, and cell adhesion and cellular mediators in patients with PSO, PSA with PSO, and PSA sine PSO. Patients with psoriatic onychopathy showed significant increased levels of ICAM-1 (p=0.010) and IP-10 (0.030) than others. In patients with PASI ≥ 10, significantly enhanced values of IL-8 (p=0.004), TNF (p=0.013), E-selectin (p=0.004), MIP-1α (p=0.003), and MIP-1β (p=0.039). In patients with BMI ≥ 30, significantly higher levels of E-selectin were pointed out (p=0.035) than others.

Conclusion

Our findings may suggest that a similar cytokine profile may characterize naïve patients with PSO, PSA with PSO, and PSA sine PSO, reinforcing the concept of psoriatic disease continuum. However, some differences may be also shown, underlying possible pathogenic differences and leading to the clinical heterogeneity of these patients.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Entheseal Fibrocartilage in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis, Athletes and Healthy Controls: A Comparison Study

The aims of this study were as follows: (1) To evaluate the entheseal fibrocartilage (EF) during Achilles tendon insertion in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) by using power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS), (2) to assess the intra and inter-reader reliability of the evaluation of EF thickness, (3) to compare the EF thickness of PsA patients, athletes and healthy controls (HCs), and (4) to evaluate the correlations between EF abnormalities, disease activity and functional indices in PsA.

METHODS

Consecutive PsA patients attending our unit were asked to participate. HCs and agonist athletes were enrolled as a control group. A bilateral PDUS evaluation of Achilles tendons was performed in order to evaluate the EF in all patients and controls.

RESULTS

In total, 30 PsA patients, 40 athletes and 20 HCs were enrolled. The median (IQR) EF thickness among the PsA patients, athletes and HCs was 0.035 cm (0.028-0.04) cm, 0.036 (0.025-0.043) cm and 0.030 (0.020-0.038) cm, respectively (p = 0.05 between PsA patients and HCs). The intra-reader reliability was excellent [ICC (95% CI) of 0.91 (0.88-0.95)] and the inter-reader reliability was good (0.80 (0.71-0.86). The assessment of EF was feasible, with a mean time of 2 min. No correlations were found with disease activity indices in PsA patients.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of EF is a feasible and reproducible test and may be explored as a potential imaging biomarker.

Psoriatic Arthritis in Males and Females: Differences and Similarities

OBJECTIVE

To assess any differences and similarities in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) between sexes. Any possible differences of psoriasis and its potential impact on disease burden between sexes with PsA were also evaluated.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of two longitudinal PsA cohorts. The impact of psoriasis on the PtGA was evaluated. Patients were stratified in four groups based on BSA. The median PtGA was then compared between the four groups. Moreover, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed in order to evaluate associations between PtGA and skin involvement, split by sexes.

RESULTS

We enrolled 141 males and 131 females: PtGA, PtPnV, tender, swollen joint count, DAPSA, HAQ-DI, PsAID-12 were statistically significant higher in females (p ≤ 0.05). PASS "yes" was deemed more in males than in females and BSA was higher in males. MDA was present more in males than females. When the patients were stratified on BSA, median PtGA was not different between males and females with BSA = 0. Instead, in females with BSA > 0, a higher PtGA was observed compared to males with BSA > 0. There was not a statistically significant association between skin involvement and PtGA at linear regression analysis, even if a trend seems to be present in female.

CONCLUSIONS

Psoriasis is more present in males, but it seems to be related to a worse impact in females. In particular, a possible role of psoriasis as an influencing factor the PtGA was found. Moreover, female PsA patients tended to have more disease activity, worse function, and higher disease burden.

What's new and what's next for biological and targeted synthetic treatments in psoriatic arthritis?

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic arthritis typically associated with cutaneous psoriasis (PsO). Its pathogenesis is connected to an innate and acquired immune response, as well as genetic risk alleles. The extent of immunopathogenic mechanisms and the heterogenicity of clinical manifestation make the identification of patient-targeted therapies a critical issue, and the treatment decision challenging in patients' management.

AREAS COVERED

This review includes a brief overview of biological and small-molecule therapies, focusing on evidence from clinical trials and real-world data that support their use in PsA. We summarize novel and future possible therapeutic strategies, the importance that comorbidities have on selection of therapy and discuss the adverse event of each drug. Relevant papers for up to 1 August 2022 (trials, real-life studies, and reviews) regarding biologics and/or small molecules were summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, the treatment of PsA has been revolutionized by new targeted therapies, which offer the opportunity to perform a tailored-tail management, considering risk factors, comorbidities, and the different PsA phenotypes. Growing experience with these new agents allows novel treatment approaches that may improve clinical outcomes for PsA patients, in terms of remission/low disease activity and quality of life.

Ex vivo cytokine production in psoriatic disease: Towards specific signatures in cutaneous psoriasis and peripheral psoriatic arthritis

Objectives

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and cutaneous psoriasis (PsO) are different phenotypes of psoriatic disease (PsD), whose underlying specific mechanisms remain incompletely understood. As cytokines are key elements to induce and tune up immune responses to drive inflammatory diseases, our objective was to assess whether clinical features, disease phenotype and PsA and PsO activity were associated with a particular ex vivo cytokine production profile.

Methods

Forty-eight patients (37 PsA and 11 PsO) and 11 healthy subjects (HS) were studied. Cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) that were either unstimulated, or stimulated with LPS or anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies, were analysed by multiplex assay in the culture supernatants.

Results

Cytokine signature of PsD includes a high level of TNFα in supernatants of LPS-stimulated PBMC, higher levels of IL-6 and lower levels of IFN-γ and IL-17A after CD3-CD28 stimulation, as well as higher spontaneous IL-1RA and TNFα production compared to HS. High body mass index (BMI) was associated with lower levels of IL-1β, and metabolic syndrome with lower levels of IFN-γ after LPS stimulation. In PsD, dermatological activity was related with higher IL-17A level, while rheumatic activity was linked with lower levels of IFN-γ and TNFα. Comparing each PsD subtype to HS, IL-1β and IL-6 productions are higher when using LPS stimulation in PsO patients with higher levels of IL-1β and IL-1α in peripheral PsA patients after CD3/CD28 stimulation. LPS stimulation induced high levels of IL-17A in peripheral PsA compared to axial PsA. PsA patients with axial PsA share some features with PsO but shows a distinct cytokine pattern compared to peripheral PsA.

Conclusion

PsO and the different PsA subtypes exhibit distinct ex vivo cytokine production profiles and common features of the so-called PsD. Analysis of IL-1 cytokine family and IL-6 seems to be of particular interest to distinguish PsO and peripheral PsA since it depends on monocytes in PsO and T-lymphocytes in peripheral PsA. Peripheral cytokine profiles are influenced by rheumatic and dermatological activity of the disease, and also by metabolic syndrome features. Our results highlight the crucial role of immune cell interactions with different patterns of interaction depending on clinical phenotype.

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Remission in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis on Treatment With Secukinumab

Background

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a multifactorial disease, and predicting remission is challenging. Machine learning (ML) is a promising tool for building multi-parametric models to predict clinical outcomes. We aimed at developing a ML algorithm to predict the probability of remission in PsA patients on treatment with Secukinumab (SEC).

Methods

PsA patients undergoing SEC treatment between September 2017 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. At baseline and 12-month follow-up, we retrieved demographic and clinical characteristics, including Body Mass Index (BMI), disease phenotypes, Disease Activity in PsA (DAPSA), Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and presence/absence of comorbidities, including fibromyalgia and metabolic syndrome. Two random feature elimination wrappers, based on an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Logistic Regression (LR), were trained and validated with 10-fold cross-validation for predicting 12-month DAPSA remission with an attribute core set with the least number of predictors. The performance of each algorithm was assessed in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results

One-hundred-nineteen patients were selected. At 12 months, 20 out of 119 patients (25.21%) achieved DAPSA remission. Accuracy and AUROC of XGBoost was of 0.97 ± 0.06 and 0.97 ± 0.07, overtaking LR (accuracy 0.73 ± 0.09, AUROC 0.78 ± 0.14). Baseline DAPSA, fibromyalgia and axial disease were the most important attributes for the algorithm and were negatively associated with 12-month DAPSA remission.

Conclusions

A ML approach may identify SEC good responders. Patients with a high disease burden and axial disease with comorbid fibromyalgia seem challenging to treat.

Dactylitis and Early Onset Psoriasis in Psoriatic Arthritis: Are they Markers of Disease Severity? A Clinical Study

Objectives

To stratify psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients based on psoriasis (PsO) onset age: early onset psoriasis (EOP) vs. late onset psoriasis (LOP), and to assess if there are differences in disease characteristics, activity/function/impact of the disease, and comorbidity indices.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of a longitudinal PsA cohort. Patients were stratified based on PsO onset age.

Results

One hundred and sixty PsA patients were enrolled (84 in EOP and 76 in LOP group) in the study. EOP PsA patients seem to have an increased probability to have dactylitis rather than LOP ones, OR 9.64 (3.77–24.6). Comorbidity indices (Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index and Charlson Comorbidity Index) were higher in LOP PsA patients, but these data were not confirmed when adjusted by age and sex. There are also differences in the treatment regimen: EOP PsA patients were more frequently treated with anti-interleukin (IL) 17; instead, LOP patients were more frequently treated with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatics drugs. There were no differences in the disease activity, function, or impact of the disease.

Conclusions

There are some clinical and therapeutic differences in PsA patients linked to the PsO onset age, namely dactylitis in EOP. Other characteristics found were: a “comorbidities trend” in LOP patients and a more frequent use of anti-IL17 in EOP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00468-3.

Clinical Characteristics of Potential "Difficult-to-treat" Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Retrospective Analysis of a Longitudinal Cohort

Introduction

The EULAR group recently published the definition of difficult-to-treat (D2T) patients for rheumatoid arthritis. However, a similar definition is lacking for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), in which its multi-domain expression may impact the treatment response. The aim of the study was to characterize the potential D2T PsA patients, to assess the risk factors, and to determine the burden of disease.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort of PsA patients attending a tertiary care center. At each visit, the patients underwent a complete physical examination and the clinical/laboratory data were collected. Data on comorbidities with the assessment of different comorbidity indices were also collected. Disease activity was assessed by using the DAPSA score and the MDA. The PsAID and HAQ-DI were also collected. We use the previous identified definition of D2T patients, applied to our PsA group and modified for this study.

Results

A total of 106 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Of these, 36 (33.9%) patients fulfilled the criteria for the potential D2T patients. D2T patients showed a significantly higher BMI and higher prevalence of fibromyalgia. Furthermore, D2T patients showed a significantly higher median Functional Comorbidity Index and a significantly higher BSA, LEI, pain level, PsAID score, and HAQ-DI than non-D2T patients. Potential D2T patients also showed a significant delay in the time from diagnosis to first b/ts DMARDs treatment.

Conclusions

Our study firstly evaluated the presence of clinical characteristics of potential D2T patients and may contribute to future research on this intriguing aspect.

Psoriatic arthritis from a mechanistic perspective

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is part of a group of closely related clinical phenotypes ('psoriatic disease') that is defined by shared molecular pathogenesis resulting in excessive, prolonged inflammation in the various tissues affected, such as the skin, the entheses or the joints. Psoriatic disease comprises a set of specific drivers that promote an aberrant immune response and the consequent development of chronic disease that necessitates therapeutic intervention. These drivers include genetic, biomechanical, metabolic and microbial factors that facilitate a robust and continuous mobilization, trafficking and homing of immune cells into the target tissues. The role of genetic variants involved in the immune response, the contribution of mechanical factors triggering an exaggerated inflammatory response (mechanoinflammation), the impact of adipose tissue and altered lipid metabolism and the influence of intestinal dysbiosis in the disease process are discussed. Furthermore, the role of key cytokines, such as IL-23, IL-17 and TNF, in orchestrating the various phases of the inflammatory disease process and as therapeutic targets in PsA is reviewed. Finally, the nature and the mechanisms of inflammatory tissue responses inherent to PsA are summarized.

Harnessing Big Data, Smart and Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Preventing, Early Intercepting, Managing, and Treating Psoriatic Arthritis: Insights From a Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Rheumatological and dermatological disorders contribute to a significant portion of the global burden of disease. Big Data are increasingly having a more and more relevant role, being highly ubiquitous and pervasive in contemporary society and paving the way for new, unprecedented perspectives in biomedicine, including dermatology and rheumatology. Rheumatology and dermatology can potentially benefit from Big Data.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) guidelines, mining “Uno per tutti”, a highly integrated and automated tool/meta-database developed at the University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy, and consisting of 20 major scholarly electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE. Big Data- or artificial intelligence-based studies were judged based on the modified Qiao’s critical appraisal tool for critical methodological quality assessment of Big Data/machine learning-based studies. Other studies designed as cross-sectional, longitudinal, or randomized investigations, reviews/overviews or expert opinions/commentaries were evaluated by means of the relevant “Joanna Briggs Institute” (JBI)’s critical appraisal tool for the critical methodological quality assessment.

Results

Fourteen papers were included in the present systematic review of the literature. Most of the studies included concerned molecular applications of Big Data, especially in the fields of genomics and post-genomics. Other studies concerned epidemiological applications, with a practical dearth of studies assessing smart and digital applications for psoriatic arthritis patients.

Conclusions

Big Data can be a real paradigm shift that revolutionizes rheumatological and dermatological practice and clinical research, helping to early intercept psoriatic arthritis patients. However, there are some methodological issues that should be properly addressed (like recording and association biases) and some ethical issues that should be considered (such as privacy). Therefore, further research in the field is warranted.

Systematic Review Registration

Registration code 10.17605/OSF.IO/4KCU2.

Prevalence of Type 2 and Type 1 Diabetes in Psoriatic Arthritis: An Italian Study

OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is burdened by an increased susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases. Comorbid diabetes may represent one of the key factors contributing to this risk. The aim of our medical records review study was to investigate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in an Italian PsA cohort.

METHODS

The clinical records of all patients consecutively seen at our clinic with a diagnosis of PsA during a 12-month period were reviewed to identify comorbid T2D or T1D. For comparison, a 1:1 age- and sex-matched group of individuals with noninflammatory diseases was recruited.

RESULTS

The final study cohort comprised 408 patients. The prevalence of T2D was 7.8% (95% confidence interval, 5.6-10.8) in PsA and 4.4% in controls (95% confidence interval, 2.8-6.9; p = 0.04). Two cases (0.49%) of T1D were identified in the PsA cohort, whereas no cases were observed in controls. In a multivariate logistic regression model including age, disease duration, and body mass index (BMI) as covariates, increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.079; p = 0.006) and BMI (OR, 1.188; p = 0.011) but not PsA duration predicted being classified as having T2D. In a similar model accounting for age and BMI, average disease activity score including 28 joints and C-reactive protein showed a trend toward significance (OR, 1.639; p = 0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our data provide further support to the emerging evidence of an increased risk of T2D in PsA patients. Cardiometabolic comorbidity represents a significant aspect of integrated arthritis management to improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and to provide a comprehensive treatment.

Nail and enthesis assessment in patients with psoriatic disease by high frequency ultrasonography: findings from a single-centre cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To characterize nail and enthesis abnormalities using high frequency ultrasound (HFUS) in patients with psoriasis (PSO), psoriatic arthritis (PSA) with PSO, and PSA sine PSO.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with PSO, PSA with PSO, and PSA sine PSO were evaluated and compared in a cross-sectional single centre study. Nail and enthesis abnormalities were evaluated by HFUS using high frequency probes (27 MHz). After a descriptive assessment, Brown University Nail Enthesis Scale (BUNES) and Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index (MASEI) were used to assess nail and enthesis, respectively.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (19 PSO, 22 PSA with PSO, 18 PSA sine PSO). In patients with PSO and in those with PSA and PSO, HFUS evaluation identified the following nail alterations characterised by thickened matrix, inhomogeneous echogenicity of the nail bed, and increased blood flow by power Doppler. In 38.9% patients with PSA sine PSO, a subclinical nail involvement was described. No difference was observed comparing BUNES values in three groups. In PSA patients with PSO and in those with PSA sine PSO, HFUS assessment of entheses mainly showed a hypoechoic aspect and thickness of the tendon, focal cortical erosion, and ossification. A subclinical enthesis involvement in 47.4% patients with PSO was observed. No difference was reported comparing MASEI values in three groups.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative and quantitative abnormalities of nail and enthesis were demonstrated by HFUS in patients with PSO, PSA with PSO, and PSA sine PSO, suggesting a practical additional tool to be used in clinical settings. Furthermore, HFUS highlighted a subclinical nail involvement in patients with PSA sine PSO and enthesis subclinical alterations in patients with PSO.

Inflammatory bowel disease manifestations in spondyloarthritis: considerations for the clinician

INTRODUCTION

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) are a group of inflammatory arthritis that can involve the spine and/or peripheral joints. Extra-articular manifestations, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are frequently observed within the clinical manifestations of SpA and are part of the SpA classification criteria. Evidence of IBD is observed in about 6-7% of SpA patients, and a silent, microscopic gut inflammation, could be present in up to 50% of patients. From a pathogenetic point of view, dysregulated microbiome and migration of T lymphocytes and other cells from gut to the joint ('gut-joint' axis) has been recognized, in the context of a common genetic background.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to narratively review the recent evidences on the epidemiology, classification, clinical findings, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of IBD in patients with SpA and to provide advices for both rheumatologist and gastroenterologist in the management of IBD in SpA.

EXPERT OPINION

IBD manifestations in SpA frequently increase the burden of the disease and represent a clinical challenge, especially for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of patients affected by those conditions. New treatment strategies targeting both articular and intestinal manifestations are now available and may lead to a better outcome.

The "Climb" Towards Minimal Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis

Introduction

Minimal disease activity (MDA) is a validated outcome measure in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) defining a low disease activity state with a cutoff of 5/7. The main aim of the study was to look at the MDA divided into in the seven cutoffs, analyzing the more frequently achieved domains. The relationship between MDA, PASS, PsAID, DAPSA, and the PhGA in all cutoffs was also evaluated.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis on PsA patients satisfying CASPAR criteria. An assessment of disease activity, treatment target, function, and impact of disease was performed. Patients achieving MDA were compared to patients not achieving MDA in order to evaluate the most frequent domain found.

Results

Ninety-three PsA patients were enrolled. MDA was satisfied in 44/93, while in 47 MDA ranged from 1/7 to 4/7. Among the seven domains, Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) was the most frequent domain found in all patients. In those not in MDA, BSA ≤ 3 (70%) and swollen joints count ≤ 1 (68%) were also well represented. The domains with a lower percentage of patients not in MDA were HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5 (38.8%), tender joint count ≤ 1 (23%), PtGA ≤ 20 (4.2%) and VAS pain ≤ 15 mm (2%). There was a growing trend, from MDA 1/7 to MDA 7/7 in the percentage of patients in PASS yes, in PsAID ≤ 4, and in DAPSA ≤ 14.

Conclusions

The present study detailed the domains more achieved also in those patients not in MDA showing that “physician-driven” domains are more frequently achieved in our patients.

Psoriatic disease is associated with systemic inflammation, endothelial activation, and altered haemostatic function

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease, affecting approximately 2% of the general population, which can be accompanied by psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The condition has been associated with an increased cardiovascular burden. Hypercoagulability is a potential underlying mechanism that may contribute to the increased risk of major cardiovascular events in psoriatic individuals. Whole blood samples were collected from 20 PsA patients and 20 healthy individuals. The concentrations of inflammatory molecules (C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and soluble P-selectin) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. In addition, clotting efficiency was evaluated by thromboelastography. The fibrin network architecture was also assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Elevated levels of circulating inflammatory molecules were significantly associated with the presence of psoriatic disease. Furthermore, an increased tendency towards thrombus formation was significantly predictive of disease presence. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that fibrin clots were denser in psoriatic individuals, compared to healthy controls, with an increased fibrin fibre diameter associated with psoriatic disease. Our results add to the accumulating evidence of the systemic nature of psoriasis and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular comorbidities, potentially due to an acquired hypercoagulability. We suggest that haemostatic function should be monitored carefully in psoriatic patients that present with severe disease, due to the pre-eminent risk of developing thrombotic complications.

Assessment of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in psoriatic arthritis: association with disease activity and quality of life indices

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminant capability of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) according to disease activity, remission/low disease activity indices and quality of life indices in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

Consecutive patients with PsA were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. At each visit, the patients underwent a complete physical examination and their clinical/laboratory data were collected. Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and remission/low disease activity using the DAPSA minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA) criteria. The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were also collected. Finally, PASS was assessed by asking all patients to answer yes or no to a single question.

Results

Patients who answered yes to PASS showed a significantly better overall mean DAPSA score than those who were not in PASS. Furthermore, patients in PASS showed a significantly lower level of systemic inflammation, lower Leeds Enthesitis Index score, a significantly lower impact of disease (PsAID), lower pain and better function than patients who answered no to PASS. A moderate to good agreement was found between PASS, MDA, DAPSA low disease activity and PsAID score ≤4. Good sensitivity and specificity were found with PASS with respect to DAPSA low disease activity, and although PASS is sensitive in the identification of patients with MDA, DAPSA remission and VLDA it lacks of specificity.

Discussion

This study showed that PASS might be used as an alternative to determine disease activity in patients with PsA in real clinical practice, mainly in patients with low disease activity according to DAPSA criteria.

Assessment of Widespread and Extraarticular Pain in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Case-control Study

OBJECTIVE

A remarkable lack of detailed knowledge on pain areas in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is present, and their clinical relevance is quite unknown. The main aim of the study was to explore pain areas in PsA, comparing them with those involved in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In addition, a secondary aim was to investigate any possible association between pain areas and outcome measures in PsA.

METHODS

This was a case-control study on patients with PsA satisfying Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria and patients with FM. In all patients with PsA and FM, a body chart filled in by the patient reporting pain areas in 80 body locations was performed. The Widespread Pain Index (WPI) was performed in all patients with PsA and FM. In all patients with PsA, an assessment of disease activity, treatment target, function, and impact of disease was carried out.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with PsA and 50 FM controls were evaluated. A significantly higher number of pain areas in the body chart and higher WPI scores were found in patients with FM when compared to patients with PsA. In PsA, the number of areas reported in the body chart significantly correlated with the Disease Activity Index for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and PsA Impact of Disease. Patients who showed a significantly high number of extraarticular pain areas involved were those who were not in remission/minimal disease activity, or who did not have a greater impact of disease or reduced function.

CONCLUSION

The main results showed that widespread and extraarticular pain was present in patients with PsA, showing that this nonarticular pain had an impact on important disease domains. The present study could contribute to an important aspect of this challenging and multifaceted disease-namely, the assessment of widespread pain.

Multimorbidity and comorbidity in psoriatic arthritis - a perspective

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a multifaceted disease in which various musculoskeletal and skin manifestations are involved. Beyond these features, PsA is associated with comorbidities that might increase the burden of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

In the last years a growing interest has come out for the concept of multimorbidity in rheumatology. Multimorbidity was defined as the 'co-existence of two or more chronic diseases in the same individual.' In the multimorbidity concept, the patient is of central concern and all coexisting diseases are of equal importance. Comorbidity was defined as the 'occurrence of any distinct additional entity during the clinical course of patient who has the index disease under study.' In PsA, comorbidity and multimorbidity have often been confusingly used interchangeably, showing that there is an unmet need on this topic.

EXPERT OPINION

This perspective article dealt with these different visions of the co-existence of other diseases in PsA, providing a distinction between them, not only for the impact on the treatment decision but also in how this concept might be incorporated into clinical trials design, choosing the right outcome measures for the patient-centric concept of multimorbidity. For this perspective, the authors searched PubMed and the Cochrane library for articles published.

Impact of Comorbidities on Disease Activity, Patient Global Assessment, and Function in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on disease activity, patient's impact of the disease, patient global assessment, and function in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Consecutive PsA patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. During the visit, the patients underwent a complete physical examination and clinical/laboratory data were collected, including type and number of comorbidities, recorded as simple comorbidity count (SCC). Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) was also evaluated. The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID), the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the Patient Global Assessment of disease activity (PtGA) were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled. At least one comorbidity was registered in 104 (72.2%) patients. The SCC was associated with DAPSA (β = 1.48, p = 0.013), PsAID (β = 0.41, p < 0.01), HAQ-DI (β = 0.11, p < 0.01) and PtGA (β = 0.50, p < 0.01). The comorbidities that showed an impact on outcome measures were anxiety and fibromyalgia (FM). Anxiety showed an impact on DAPSA (β = 14.46, p < 0.001), PsAID (β = 1.98, p = 0.039) and HAQ-DI (β = 0.54, p = 0.036). FM showed an impact on DAPSA (β = 6.46, p = 0.025), PsAID (β = 2.88, p < 0.001), HAQ-DI (β = 0.70, p < 0.001), PtGA (β = 2.00, p = 0.014), and MDA (β = - 2.79, p = 0.01). The median PtGA value was different among patients with different numbers of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that comorbidities, either as a simple comorbidity count number or as single comorbidity, might have an impact on the main domains affecting PsA patients in real clinical practice.

Psoriasis and Connective Tissue Diseases

Psoriasis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease with various co-morbidities, having been recently considered as a comprehensive disease named psoriatic disease or psoriatic syndrome. Autoimmune diseases are one form of its co-morbidities. In addition to the genetic background, shared pathogenesis including innate immunity, neutrophil extracellular trap (NETs), and type I interferon, as well as acquitted immunity such as T helper-17 (Th17) related cytokines are speculated to play a significant role in both psoriasis and connective tissue diseases. On the other hand, there are definite differences between psoriasis and connective tissue diseases, such as their pathomechanisms and response to drugs. Therefore, we cannot expect that one stone kills two birds, and thus caution is necessary when considering whether the administered drug for one disease is effective or not for another disease. In this review, several connective tissue diseases and related diseases are discussed from the viewpoint of their coexistence with psoriasis.