Do initial hematologic indices predict the severity of COVID-19 patients?

Complete Blood Count in Children With COVID-19: A Predictor of Disease Severity

Blood count abnormalities are frequent in patients with severe COVID-19 disease and there is still a lack of information in pediatric complete blood count (CBC) results. Thus, this study aims to correlate the CBC in the emergency room of children with COVID-19 between 0 and 10 years old and the clinical severity of the disease. A retrospective cohort study was performed in children with COVID-19 who collected at the emergency room CBC, C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil to monocyte ratio (NMR), lymphocyte to neutrophil ratio (LNR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), monocyte to neutrophil ratio (MNR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR). In total, demographic data from 93 children with median age of 19 months (0.3-126), 60.2% males, were included. The main changes in the CBC were atypical lymphocytes (51.6%) and eosinopenia (49.5%). From 69 hospitalized children, 21 were considered severe. There was no association between age, gender, and CRP value with clinical severity. The presence of underlying disease was five times higher (odds ratio [OR] = 5.08) in patients who required hospitalization and a higher NLR value was 54% (OR = 1.54) more likely to occur. Eosinopenia was three times more frequent in inpatients with disease severity criteria (OR = 3.05). In conclusion, children younger than 10 years of age with COVID-19 have changes in the CBC collected in the emergency room, mainly atypical lymphocytes and eosinopenia. The presence of a comorbidity or a higher NLR increases the chance of hospitalization. In addition, eosinopenia was a predictor of severity in inpatient children due to COVID-19.

Diagnostic value of routine blood tests in differentiating between SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and RSV infections in hospitalized children: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections have similar modes of transmission and clinical symptoms. There is a need to identify simple diagnostic indicators to distinguish these three infections, particularly for community hospitals and low- and middle-income countries that lack nucleic acid detection kits. This study used clinical data to assess the diagnostic value of routine blood tests in differentiating between SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and RSV infections in children.

METHODS

A total of 1420 children treated at the Hangzhou Children's Hospital between December 2022 and June 2023 were enrolled in this study, of whom 351 had SARS-CoV-2, 671 had influenza, and 398 had RSV. In addition, 243 healthy children were also collected. The blood test results of SARS-CoV-2 patients were compared to those of patients with influenza A and RSV and the healthy controls. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) was employed to evaluate each blood parameter's diagnostic value.

RESULTS

Children with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited notably elevated levels of white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, neutrophil count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) compared to influenza A patients (P < 0.05). In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 patients exhibited a decrease in the mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio (MPV/PLT) and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) when compared to other individuals (P < 0.05). These parameters had an AUC between 0.5 and 0.7. Compared to patients with RSV, SARS-CoV-2 patients had significantly higher MPV/PLT and significantly lower WBC, lymphocyte, PLT, LMR, and lymphocyte multiplied by platelet (LYM*PLT) values (P < 0.05). However, only LYM*PLT had an acceptable diagnostic value above 0.7 for all age groups. Compared to healthy children, children with COVID-19 exhibited elevated NLR and MPV/PLT levels, alongside decreased lymphocyte, PLT, LMR, and LYM*PLT values. (P < 0.05). The AUC of the LMR, LYM*PLT, and PLT were above 0.7 in all age groups, indicating promising diagnostic values.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine blood parameters among patients with COVID-19, influenza A, and RSV differ significantly early in the disease and could be used by clinicians to discriminate between the 3 types of infection.

Predictive ability of complete blood count, mean platelet ratio, mean platelet volume, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for severe pneumonia among RT-PCR or radiologically proven COVID-19 patients

Background

Immuno-inflammatory markers related to white blood cells, and platelets are shown to be associated with COVID-19 infection, and considered to be independent markers for clinical outcomes and mortality. The present study aimed to study the predictive value of these hematologic parameters in progression of COVID-19 to severe pneumonia.

Methods

This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted among RT-PCR or radiologically proven COVID-19 patients in a tertiary care hospital in Rajasthan. Semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the epidemiological information of the patients with COVID-19. Complete blood count and other laboratory parameters were also studied among the patients.

Results

Mean age of participants in the study was 52 years, with about 70% being males. Cough and breathlessness were the most common symptoms among the patients. It was found that the parameters related to white blood cells were significantly different between patients with COVID-19 infection and severe pneumonia (except absolute monocyte count). NLR was significantly higher among those with severe pneumonia. In the univariate analysis, age (OR - 1.02), NLR (OR - 1.16), and albumin (OR - 0.45) were found to be significant predictors of progression to severe pneumonia. In the final model, adjusted for confounders, only NLR and albumin levels significantly predicted progression to severe pneumonia among COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

The study consolidates the predictive ability of NLR for severe pneumonia. It is an important finding, as health facilities with limited access to laboratory investigations can rely on simple markers in routine practice to predict the progression of COVID-19 infection to severe pneumonia.

The association between mean platelet volume and poor outcome in patients with COVID-19: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

Introduction

This study aims to assess the association between mean platelet volume (MPV) and poor outcome in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search using the PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases with keywords "2019-nCoV" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "COVID-19" AND "mean platelet volume" OR "MPV" on 8 July 2021. The primary outcome was composite poor outcome, defined as severe COVID-19 or mortality. The pooled effect estimate was reported as mean differences in terms of MPV between the group with and without outcome.

Results

There were 17 studies which consist of 4549 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. The incidence of poor outcome was 25% (20%-30%). Mean MPV was found to be higher in the poor outcome group in compare to no poor outcome group (10.3 ± 1.9 fL vs 9.9 ± 1.7 fL). The mean MPV difference between both group was 0.47 fL [95% CI 0.27, 0.67], p < 0.001; I2: 62.91%, p < 0.001). In the sub-group analysis, patients with severe COVID-19 had higher MPV (mean difference 0.54 fL [95% CI 0.28, 0.80], p < 0.001; I2: 54.84%, p = 0.014). Furthermore, MPV was also higher in the mortality group (mean difference 0.54 fL [95% CI 0.29, 0.80], p = 0.020; I2: 71.11%, p = 0.004). Meta-regression analysis showed that the association between MPV and poor outcome was not affected by age (p = 0.789), gender (p = 0.167), platelets (p = 0.056), white blood cells (p = 0.639), and lymphocytes (p = 0.733).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicated that increased MPV was associated with severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Further research is needed to determine the optimum cut-off point.

How to diagnose COVID-19 in family practice? Usability of complete blood count as a COVID-19 diagnostic tool: a cross-sectional study in Turkey

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 is currently diagnosed in hospital settings. An easy and practical diagnosis of COVID-19 is needed in primary care. For this purpose, the usability of complete blood count in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was investigated.

DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single-centre study in a tertiary university hospital in Erzurum, Turkey.

PARTICIPANTS

Between March 2020 and February 2021, patients aged 18-70 years who applied to the hospital and underwent both complete blood count and reverse-transcription-PCR tests for COVID-19 were included and compared. Conditions affecting the test parameters (oncological-haematological conditions, chronic diseases, drug usage) were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURE

The complete blood count and COVID-19 results of eligible patients identified using diagnostic codes [U07.3 (COVID-19) or Z03.8 (observation for other suspected diseases and conditions)] were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 978 patients included, 39.4% (n=385) were positive for COVID-19 and 60.6% (n=593) were negative. The mean age was 41.5±14.5 years, and 53.9% (n=527) were male. COVID-19-positive patients were found to have significantly lower leucocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, basophil, platelet and immature granulocyte (IG) values (p<0.001). Neutrophil/lymphocyte, neutrophil/monocyte and IG/lymphocyte ratios were also found to be significantly decreased (p<0.001). With logistic regression analysis, low lymphocyte count (OR 0.695; 95% CI 0.597 to 0.809) and low red cell distribution width-coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) (OR 0.887; 95% CI 0.818 to 0.962) were significantly associated with COVID-19 positivity. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cut-off values of lymphocyte and RDW-CV were 0.745 and 12.35, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although our study was designed retrospectively and reflects regional data, it is important to determine that low lymphocyte count and RDW-CV can be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in primary care.

Comparison of the Predictive Ability of the Blood Urea Nitrogen/Albumin, C-Reactive Protein/Albumin, and Lactate/Albumin Ratios for Short-Term Mortality in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients

Background  Hematological parameters and their ratios are the most studied biomarkers for prediction of mortality or severe illness in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This study aims to compare the power of the blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/albumin ratio, lactate/albumin ratio, and C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio, measured at the time of admission, in predicting 30-day mortality in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods  This retrospectively designed, single-center, observational study was performed in the ED of a tertiary education health care center. We documented the data of patients admitted with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. Results  Of the 470 patients included in the study, 232 (49.4%) were female. The all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 23.8%. The area under the curve values for the BUN/albumin ratio, lactate/albumin ratio, and CRP/albumin ratio in the prediction of 30-day mortality were 0.725, 0.641, and 0.749, respectively. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for CRP/albumin ratio (≥0.049) and specificity for BUN/albumin ratio (≥1.17) were 92.86, 94.9, and 71.23, respectively. The odds ratio values of the BUN/albumin ratio (≥1.17), CRP/albumin ratio (≥0.049), and lactate/albumin ratio (≥0.046) for 30-day mortality were determined as 4.886, 9.268, and 2.518, respectively. Conclusion  The BUN/albumin ratio and CRP/albumin ratio can be used to predict 30-day mortality in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients admitted to ED. Furthermore, CRP/albumin ratio had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value, while BUN/albumin ratio had the highest specificity.

THE IMPORTANCE OF INFLAMMATORY MARKERS IN PREDICTION OF MORTALITY IN COVID-19 PATIENTS

ÖZET GİRİŞ: Çin’de 2019 Aralık ayı sonunda ortaya çıkan COVID-19 kısa sürede tüm dünyaya yayılarak Dünya Sağlık Örgütü tarafından 11 Mart 2020’de pandemi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Pandemi hala değişen varyantlarıyla ve vaka sayılarıyla güncelliğini korumaktadır. Bu çalışmada COVID-19 tanılı yatan hastalarda 1. ve 5. gün bakılan hematolojik, inflamatuvar ve biyokimyasal belirteçlerin mortaliteyi öngörmede önemini belirlemeyi amaçladık. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM: Araştırma retrospektif ve kesitsel çalışma olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmaya 1 Kasım 2020-30 Nisan 2021 tarihleri arasında Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Hastanesi’ne COVID-19 şüpheli semptomları ile başvuran COVID-19 RT-PCR testi ile tanısı doğrulanarak yatışı yapılan 18 yaş üstü 200 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, eşlik eden komorbid hastalıkları, 1. ve 5. gün laboratuvar parametreleri ve sonlanım durumları kaydedildi. Hastalar taburcu ve ölen şeklinde iki gruba ayrıldı. BULGULAR: Çalışmaya alınan 200 hastanın %75’i (n=150) taburcu olan, %25’i ise (n=50) 28 gün içinde ölen hastalardan oluşmaktaydı. Hastaların %63.5 (n=127) erkek, %36.5’i (n=73) kadındı. Hastaların yaş ortalaması 63±17.2 yıldı. Hastaların %50.5’i hafif, %31’i orta, %18.5’i ise ağır klinik tabloya sahipti. COVID-19 hastalarının prognozunu etkileyen faktörleri belirlemek amacıyla lojistik regresyon analizi yapıldı. Prognoz ile ilişkili faktörler erkek cinsiyet, diyabetes mellitus, KOAH, hipertansiyon varlığı, ateş, nefes darlığı ve öksürük olarak bulundu. Hastaların 1. ve 5.gün bakılan lenfosit (lenfopeni), C-Reaktif Protein (CRP), Prokalsitonin (PCT),nötrofil7lenfosit oranı (NLO), platelet /lenfosit oranı (PLO), D-Dimer değerleri tanı anında ve takiplerde mortalite öngörücüsü olarak tespit edildi (p

COVID-19 Severity and Mortality in Two Pandemic Waves in Poland and Predictors of Poor Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hospitalized Young Adults

SARS-CoV-2 variants pose a significant threat to global public health. However, their influence on disease severity, especially among young adults who may exhibit different clinical characteristics, is debatable. In this retrospective study of 229 young adults hospitalized with COVID-19, we investigated the differences between Poland's second and third waves of the pandemic. To identify potential predictors of severe COVID-19 in young adults, we analyzed patient characteristics and laboratory findings between survivors and non-survivors and we performed logistic regression to assess the risk of death, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit treatment. We found no increase in COVID-19 severity comparing the third and second waves of the pandemic, indicating that the alpha variant had no influence on disease severity. In addition, we found that factors, such as obesity, comorbidities, lung involvement, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, higher IG count, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, interleukin-6, D-Dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, high-sensitive troponin I, creatine kinase-myocardial band, myoglobin, N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, creatinine, urea and gamma-glutamyl transferase, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, albumin, calcium and vitamin D3, possibly a decrease in red blood cell counts, hemoglobin and hematocrit, and an increase in creatine kinase during hospitalization may be associated with poor outcomes of COVID-19.

The Impact of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLR) has emerged as a potential prognostic tool for different diseases. In the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the NLR may be a useful tool for risk scarification and the optimal utilization of limited healthcare resources. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal value of NLR, and the association with disease severity and mortality. Thus, this study aims to systematically analyze the current evidence of the utility of baseline NLR as a predictive tool for mortality, disease severity in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A compendious screening of electronic databases up to June 15, 2021, was done after enlisting the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020202659). Studies evaluating the utility of baseline NLR in COVID-19 are included for this review as per the PRISMA statement. Results: We retrieved a total of 13112 and 12986 COVID-19 patients for survivability and severity over 90 studies. The expired and critically sick patients had elevated baseline NLR on admission, in comparison to survivors and noncritical patients. (SMD = 3.82; 95% CI: 2.79-4.85; I2 = 100% and SMD = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.22-1.63; I2 = 95%, respectively). The summary receiver operating curve analysis for mortality (AUC = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.86-0.87; I2 = 94.7%), and severity (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.80-0.84; I2 = 79.7%) were also suggestive of its significant predictive value. Conclusions: The elevated NLR on admission in COVID-19 patients is associated with poor outcomes.

A composite ranking of risk factors for COVID-19 time-to-event data from a Turkish cohort

Having a complete and reliable list of risk factors from routine laboratory blood test for COVID-19 disease severity and mortality is important for patient care and hospital management. It is common to use meta-analysis to combine analysis results from different studies to make it more reproducible. In this paper, we propose to run multiple analyses on the same set of data to produce a more robust list of risk factors. With our time-to-event survival data, the standard survival analysis were extended in three directions. The first is to extend from tests and corresponding p-values to machine learning and their prediction performance. The second is to extend from single-variable to multiple-variable analysis. The third is to expand from analyzing time-to-decease data with death as the event of interest to analyzing time-to-hospital-release data to treat early recovery as a meaningful event as well. Our extension of the type of analyses leads to ten ranking lists. We conclude that 20 out of 30 factors are deemed to be reliably associated to faster-death or faster-recovery. Considering correlation among factors and evidenced by stepwise variable selection in random survival forest, 10 ~ 15 factors seem to be able to achieve the optimal prognosis performance. Our final list of risk factors contain calcium, white blood cell and neutrophils count, urea and creatine, d-dimer, red cell distribution widths, age, ferritin, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase, lymphocyte, basophils, anemia related factors (hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration), sodium, potassium, eosinophils, and aspartate aminotransferase.

Multi-inflammatory Index as a Novel Mortality Predictor in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

Aim

Systemic inflammation has a crucial role in the pathogenesis and mortality of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Multi-inflammatory index (MII) is a novel index related with systemic inflammation. In this study, we investigated the relationship between MII and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of COVID-19 patients followed-up in the ICU of our institution between 01.04.2020 and 01.10.2021. Patients were classified into two groups according to mortality status as survivors and non-survivors. Various inflammatory parameters of the groups were compared and their efficacy in predicting mortality was investigated.

Results

Out of 348 study patients, 86 cases (24.7%) were in the survived group and 262 cases (75.3%) were in the dead group. The median age of the mortal group was significantly higher than that of the survived group (65.5 vs 76, P < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that among all the included inflammatory parameters, MII showed the best efficacy for predicting mortality (OR: 0.999; 95% CI: 0.9991-0.9998; P = .003).

Conclusion

MII, a new combination of Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), is a simple and practical biomarker that can help us in the prediction of mortality in COVID-19 patients followed-up in the ICU.

A retrospective study of age-defined hematologic inflammatory markers related to pediatric COVID-19 diagnosis

Background

The aim of this study was to examine age‐related differences in hemogram parameters and hematologic inflammatory markers in pediatric patients with COVID‐19.

Methods

This retrospective study included children aged 2 months to 18 years (n = 208) who have a confirmed diagnosis of COVID‐19 and a control group comprising 117 healthy children between February 2021 and July 2021. The analysis of subgroup hematological values were performed according to the children's age cutoffs.

Results

The most significant difference between pediatric patients with COVID‐19 and controls were peripheral blood eosinophil counts and eosinophil‐to‐monocyte ratio (EMR) levels on admission. The levels of monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, aggeregate index of systemic inflammation (neutrophil × platelet × monocyte/lymphocyte), neutrophil‐to‐ lymphocyte × platelet ratio, and systemic inflammation response index (neutrophil × monocyte/ lymphocyte) were higher in patients than in controls. EMR had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.777, with a cutoff value of 0.26. The sensitivity for EMR was 75% under 2 years of age, and between 78.6–87.5% in the other age groups.

Conclusion

In children younger than 6 months, the discriminative power of hematological indices is low, while the discriminative power of EMR is high at all ages when age appropriate cutoffs are used. Hematological inflammatory parameters may be particularly practical in pediatric clinics to help identify COVID‐19 infection.

Sex-Dependent Performance of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte, Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte and Mean Platelet Volume-to-Platelet Ratios in Discriminating COVID-19 Severity

Background

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and mean platelet volume-to-platelet ratio (MPR) are combined hematology tests that predict COVID-19 severity, although with different cut-off values. Because sex significantly impacts immune responses and the course of COVID-19, the ratios could be biased by sex.

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate sex-dependent differences in the contribution of NLR, PLR, MLR, and MPR to COVID-19 severity and mortality upon hospital admission using a sample of pneumonia patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

This single-center observational cross-sectional study included 3,280 confirmed COVID-19 cases (CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic) from Quito (Ecuador). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to identify optimal cut-offs of the above parameters when discriminating severe COVID-19 pneumonia and mortality risks after segregation by sex. Severe COVID-19 pneumonia was defined as having PaO₂ < 60 mmHg and SpO₂ < 94%, whereas non-severe COVID-19 pneumonia was defined as having PaO₂ ≥ 60 mmHg and SpO₂ ≥ 94%.

Results

The mortality rate of COVID-19 among men was double that in women. Severe COVID-19 pneumonia and non-surviving patients had a higher level of NLR, MLR, PLR, and MPR. The medians of NLR, MLR, and MPR in men were significantly higher, but PLR was not different between men and women. In men, these ratios had lower cut-offs than in women (NLR: 2.42 vs. 3.31, MLR: 0.24 vs. 0.35, and PLR: 83.9 vs. 151.9). The sensitivity of NLR, MLR, and PLR to predict pneumonia severity was better in men (69–77%), whereas their specificity was enhanced in women compared to men (70–76% vs. 23–48%).

Conclusion

These ratios may represent widely available biomarkers in COVID-19 since they were significant predictors for disease severity and mortality although with different performances in men and women.

Prognostic role of simple inflammatory biomarkers in patients with severe COVID-19: an observational study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Simple inflammatory biomarkers, such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), could serve as prognosis indicators in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The utility of on-admission inflammatory biomarkers in predicting outcomes was investigated in patients suffering from severe COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study to assess the role of white blood count (WBC), neutrophils (N), lymphocyte (L), platelets (PLTs), C-reactive protein (CRP), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), NLR (N/L), PLR (P/L), dv (derived variation of)-NLR (N/WBC-L), LNR (L/N), dv (derived variation of)-LNR (L/WBC-N), and CLR (CRP/L), in predicting the need for high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use, admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and death in adult patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the Department of Respiratory Medicine from April to September 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen patients (60 % males) with a mean age of 57.7 ± 16.3 years were included. Thirty-seven patients (32.2 %) required escalation with HFNC, eight patients (7 %) were admitted to the ICU, and nine patients (7.8%) died. Based on univariate analysis, CRP [odds ratio (OR): 1.25, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.1-1.42), LNR (OR: 0.015, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.35), dv-NLR (OR: 5*106, 95 % CI: 26.7-9*109), CLR (OR: 7*1058, 95 % CI: 3*1025-2*1092), length of hospitalization (LOH; OR: 1.44, 95 % CI: 1.22-1.63), dyspnea at presentation (OR: 2.83, 95 % CI: 1.23-6.52), and ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) on admission (OR: 0.967, 95 % CI: 0.952-0.983) were independent predictors for oxygen requirements. However, the multivariate analysis showed that LNR (OR: 1.686e0-4, 95 % CI: 6.441e00-8-0.441), PaO2/FiO2 on admission (OR: 0.965, 95 % CI: 0.941-0.989), and LOH (OR: 1.717, 95 % CI: 1.274-2.314) were the most important predictor for HFNC use. Nasal congestion at presentation (OR: 11.5, 95 % CI: 1.61-82.8) was a unique and independent predictor for ICU admission. As far as death is concerned, the univariate analysis identified elevated CRP (OR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 1.0-1.24), low RT-PCR (OR: 0.829, 95 % CI: 0.688-0.999), high CLR (OR: 3.2*1033, 95 % CI: 5.8-1.8*1066), age (OR: 1.08, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.14), body mass index (BMI) over 30 (OR: 5.25, 95 % CI: 1.26-21.96), the chronic use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (OR: 5.72, 95 % CI: 1.35-24.09), nitrates (OR: 14.85, 95 % CI: 1.81-121.8), diuretics (OR: 8.21, 95 % CI: 1.97-34.32), PaO2/FiO2 on admission (OR: 0.983, 95 % CI: 0.970-0.998), and nasal congestion at presentation (OR: 9.81, 95 % CI: 1.40-68.68) as independent predictors. However, the multivariate analysis pinpointed that obesity (BMI >30) (OR: 10.498, 95 % CI: 1.107-99.572) remained the most important predictor for death.

CONCLUSION

LNR and PaO2/FiO2 on admission could be used to timely identify patients requiring HFNC during hospitalization, while obesity (BMI >30) could be an independent predictor of death. Nasal congestion emerges as a unique predictor for ICU admission. HIPPOKRATIA 2022, 26 (2):70-77.

Role of red blood cell distribution width, as a prognostic indicator in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The red blood cell distribution width (RDW), an indicator of anisocytosis has emerged as a potential tool for risk stratification of critically ill patients with sepsis. Prognostic predictors are of paramount interest for prompt intervention and optimal utilization of the healthcare system in this ongoing context of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the utility of RDW in the prognosis of COVID-19 patients. A comprehensive screening of electronic databases was performed up to 30th April 2021 after enrolling in PROSPERO (CRD42020206685). Observational studies or interventional studies, evaluating the impact of RDW in COVID-19 outcomes (mortality and severity) are included in this meta-analysis.Our search retrieved 25 studies, with a total of 18,392 and 3,446 COVID-19 patients for mortality and disease severity outcomes. Deceased and critically ill patients had higher RDW levels on admission in comparison to survivors and non-severe patients (SMD = 0.46; 95%CI 0.31-0.71; I2  = 88% and SMD = 0.46; 95%CI 0.26-0.67; I2  = 60%, respectively). In a sub-group analysis of 2,980 patients, RDW > 14.5 has been associated with increased risk of mortality (OR = 2.73; 95%CI 1.96-3.82; I2  = 56%). However, the evidences is of low quality. A higher level of RDW on admission in COVID-19 patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, further studies regarding the cut-off value of RDW are the need of the hour.

Evaluation of coagulation with TEG in patients diagnosed COVID-19

BACKGROUND

A high D-dimer level may indicate the risk of coagulopathy and mortality in COVID-19 patients. T hromboelastography (TEG) is a test that evaluates clot formation and fibrinolysis in real-time, unlike routine coagulation tests. The study aimed to investigate the coagulation process with TEG in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

METHODS

The study was performed at our university hospital, chest diseases outpatient clinic as a cross-section study. A total of 51 patients with 23 high D-dimer levels group (HDG) and 28 low D-dimers group (LDG) were included in the study. TEG analysis was performed at the pretreatment evaluation in these two groups.

RESULTS

D-dimer and fibrinogen levels of the HDG were higher than those of the LDG (550 vs. 90 ng/mL, p < 0.001; 521 vs. 269 mg/ dL, p < 0.001, respectively). In TEG analysis, HDG's R and K values were lower than LDG, and HDG's Angle, MA, and CI values were higher than LDG (p = 0.037; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively). ROC curve analysis suggested that the optimum TEG parameters cut-off points for thrombosis risk were as below: for K was ≤2.1 min, for R was ≤6.1 min, for Angle was >62°, MA was 60.4 mm.

Usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the severity of COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Quick and accurate identification of critically ill patients ensures appropriate and correct use of medical resources. In situations that threaten public health, like pandemics, rapid and effective methods are needed for early disease detection among critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients upon admission to the emergency department (ED) and these patients' prognosis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective cohort study among COVID-19 patients in the ED of a tertiary-level hospital.

METHODS

Data on patients' age, gender, vital signs, chronic diseases, laboratory tests and clinical outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of NLR for predicting in-hospital mortality risk and intensive care unit (ICU) requirement. The Youden J index (YJI) was used to determine optimal threshold values.

RESULTS

1,175 patients were included. Their median age was 63 years (IQR, 48-75). With an NLR cutoff value of 5.14, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, AUC and YJI for ICU requirement were calculated as 77.87%, 74.08%, 92.4%, 0.811 and 0.5194, respectively. With the same cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity, AUC and YJI for in-hospital mortality were 77.27%, 75.82%, 0.815 and 0.5309, respectively. In addition, advanced age, leukocytosis, anemia and lymphopenia were found to be associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The NLR, which is a widely available simple parameter, can provide rapid insights regarding early recognition of critical illness and prognosis among COVID-19 patients.

Identification of hematological and inflammatory parameters associated with disease severity in hospitalized patients of COVID-19

Background and Objectives

India has emerged as the second worst hit nation by the Coronavirus pandemic in terms of total number of cases. Our data on hematological and inflammatory markers associated with COVID-19 is very limited. This study was conducted to assess the utility of various biomarkers in identifying severe disease.

Materials and Methods

All confirmed cases of COVID-19 admitted in our tertiary care centre from 1st March 2021 to 31st March 2021 were enrolled in the study. They were categorized into severe and non-severe disease categories based on pre-decided criteria. Their complete blood count parameters, D-dimer levels, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values were retrieved.

Statistical Analysis

All parameters were expressed as Mean ± Standard deviation for the two groups of patients. Student's t-test was used to test significance of the above markers between severe and non- severe disease. (P value < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant).

Results

A total of 150 COVID RT-PCR positive patients were evaluated. The patients with higher Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC), Neutrophil to lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), D-dimer levels and raised serum CRP, LDH, ferritin along with lymphocytopenia were associated with severe disease (P < 0.05). Hemoglobin, total leucocyte count and platelet count showed no correlation with disease severity.

Conclusion

These biomarkers associated with disease severity especially NLR, PLR, D-dimer and serum CRP levels could be used to triage patients at the time of admission thereby identifying those requiring intensive care and enabling optimal resource utilization.

Are platelet volume indices of clinical use in COVID-19? A systematic review

Background

The incidence of thrombotic complications is high in COVID-19 patients with severe disease. As key regulators of thrombus formation, platelets likely play a crucial role as mediators of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 associated pathogenesis. Studies have reported that parameters reflecting platelet size, known as platelet volume indices (PVI), are raised in patients with thrombosis and can predict poor outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the potential for PVI to be used as a predictor of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.

Methods

English and Chinese databases were searched electronically to identify studies reporting data on mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width or platelet-large cell ratio in COVID-19 patients. Included articles underwent a quality rating and descriptive narrative analysis.

Results

Thirty-two studies were included in the systematic review. The results show a general trend for PVI to be raised in severe COVID-19 patients and non-survivors, with 14 studies reporting significant differences of baseline PVI between severe and mild disease. Nonetheless, longitudinal studies showed varying PVI trends over the course of the disease and evidence for PVI to be associated with disease progression was limited. The quality rating of 12 studies was poor, 16 were rated fair and four were good. Most studies were retrospective in design, used small study populations and did not consider confounding factors that influence platelet volume. Studies also contained technical flaws in PVI measurement, limiting the reliability of the results.

Conclusion

The evidence on the clinical usefulness of PVI is greatly limited by the lack of prospective evaluation, together with technical problems in measuring PVI. Carefully designed prospective studies are warranted.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=304305, identifier CRD42022304305.

Red blood cell distribution width as a prognostic biomarker for viral infections: prospects and challenges

Viral diseases remain a significant global health threat, and therefore prioritization of limited healthcare resources is required to effectively manage dangerous viral disease outbreaks. In a pandemic of a newly emerged virus that is yet to be well understood, a noninvasive host-derived prognostic biomarker is invaluable for risk prediction. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW), an index of red blood cell size disorder (anisocytosis), is a potential predictive biomarker for severity of many diseases. In view of the need to prioritize resources during response to outbreaks, this review highlights the prospects and challenges of RDW as a prognostic biomarker for viral infections, with a focus on hepatitis and COVID-19, and provides an outlook to improve the prognostic performance of RDW for risk prediction in viral diseases.

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an accessible and widely used biomarker. NLR may be used as an early marker of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of the NLR in patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Observational studies that reported the association between baseline NLR values (ie, at hospital admission) and severity or all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random effects models and inverse variance method were used for meta-analyses. The effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Small study effects were assessed with the Egger's test.

RESULTS

We analysed 61 studies (n = 15 522 patients), 58 cohorts, and 3 case-control studies. An increase of one unit of NLR was associated with higher odds of severity (OR 6.22; 95%CI 4.93 to 7.84; P < .001) and higher odds of all-cause mortality (OR 12.6; 95%CI 6.88 to 23.06; P < .001). In our sensitivity analysis, we found that 41 studies with low risk of bias and moderate heterogeneity (I2  = 53% and 58%) maintained strong association between NLR values and both outcomes (severity: OR 5.36; 95% CI 4.45 to 6.45; P < .001; mortality: OR 10.42 95% CI 7.73 to 14.06; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher values of NLR were associated with severity and all-cause mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

The effect of high-dose parenteral vitamin D3 on COVID-19-related inhospital mortality in critical COVID-19 patients during intensive care unit admission: an observational cohort study

Background

In many studies, vitamin D has been found to be low in COVID-19 patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical course and inhospital mortality with parenteral administration of high-dose vitamin D₃ within the first 24 h of admission to patients who were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of COVID-19 with vitamin D deficiency.

Methods

This study included 175 COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency [25(OH) D <12 ng/mL] who were hospitalized in the ICU. Vitamin D₃ group (n = 113) included patients who received a single dose of 300,000 IU vitamin D3 intramuscularly. Vitamin D₃ was not administered to the control group (n = 62).

Results

Median C-reactive protein level was 10.8 mg/dL in the vitamin D₃ group and 10.6 mg/dL in the control group (p = 0.465). Thirty-nine percent (n = 44) of the patients in the vitamin D₃ group were intubated endotracheally, and 50% (n = 31) of the patients in the control group were intubated endotracheally (p = 0.157). Parenteral vitamin D₃ administration was not associated with inhospital mortality by multivariate logistic regression analysis. According to Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the median survival time was 16 d in the vitamin D3 group and 17 d in the control group (log-rank test, p = 0.459).

Conclusion

In this study, which was performed for the first time in the literature, it was observed that high-dose parenteral vitamin D₃ administration in critical COVID-19 patients with vitamin D deficiency during admission to the ICU did not reduce the need for intubation, length of hospital stay, and inhospital mortality.

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width, Disease Severity, and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The identification of biomarkers predicting disease severity and outcomes is the focus of intense research in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 infection). Ideally, such biomarkers should be easily derivable from routine tests. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive role of the red blood cell distribution width (RDW), a routine hematological test, in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, from January 2020 to November 2020, for studies reporting data on the RDW and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, defined as severe illness or admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality. Eleven studies in 4901 COVID-19 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that the RDW values were significantly higher in patients with severe disease and non-survivors (standard mean difference, SMD = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.81, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity between studies was extreme (I² = 80.6%; p < 0.001). In sensitivity analysis, the effect size was not modified when each study was in turn removed (effect size range, between 0.47 and 0.63). The Begg’s (p = 0.53) and Egger’s tests (p = 0.52) showed no evidence of publication bias. No significant correlations were observed between SMD and age, gender, whole blood count, end point, study geographic area, or design. Our meta-analysis showed that higher RDW values are significantly associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality. This routine parameter might assist with early risk stratification in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.