Association between Frontal-Executive Dysfunction and Speech-in-Noise Perception Deficits in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Cross-Sectional Associations of Peripheral Hearing, Brain Imaging, and Cognitive Performance With Speech-in-Noise Performance: The Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ancillary Study

PURPOSE

Population-based evidence in the interrelationships among hearing, brain structure, and cognition is limited. This study aims to investigate the cross-sectional associations of peripheral hearing, brain imaging measures, and cognitive function with speech-in-noise performance among older adults.

METHOD

We studied 602 participants in the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ancillary study, including 427 ACHIEVE baseline (2018-2020) participants with hearing loss and 175 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study Visit 6/7 (2016-2017/2018-2019) participants with normal hearing. Speech-in-noise performance, as outcome of interest, was assessed by the Quick Speech-in-Noise (QuickSIN) test (range: 0-30; higher = better). Predictors of interest included (a) peripheral hearing assessed by pure-tone audiometry; (b) brain imaging measures: structural MRI measures, white matter hyperintensities, and diffusion tensor imaging measures; and (c) cognitive performance assessed by a battery of 10 cognitive tests. All predictors were standardized to z scores. We estimated the differences in QuickSIN associated with every standard deviation (SD) worse in each predictor (peripheral hearing, brain imaging, and cognition) using multivariable-adjusted linear regression, adjusting for demographic variables, lifestyle, and disease factors (Model 1), and, additionally, for other predictors to assess independent associations (Model 2).

RESULTS

Participants were aged 70-84 years, 56% female, and 17% Black. Every SD worse in better-ear 4-frequency pure-tone average was associated with worse QuickSIN (-4.89, 95% confidence interval, CI [-5.57, -4.21]) when participants had peripheral hearing loss, independent of other predictors. Smaller temporal lobe volume was associated with worse QuickSIN, but the association was not independent of other predictors (-0.30, 95% CI [-0.86, 0.26]). Every SD worse in global cognitive performance was independently associated with worse QuickSIN (-0.90, 95% CI [-1.30, -0.50]).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral hearing and cognitive performance are independently associated with speech-in-noise performance among dementia-free older adults. The ongoing ACHIEVE trial will elucidate the effect of a hearing intervention that includes amplification and auditory rehabilitation on speech-in-noise understanding in older adults.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25733679.

The impact of age-related hearing loss on cognitive decline: The mediating role of brain age gap

In recent years, the relationship between age-related hearing loss, cognitive decline, and the risk of dementia has garnered significant attention. The significant variability in brain health and aging among individuals of the same chronological age suggests that a measure assessing how one's brain ages may better explain hearing-cognition links. The main aim of this study was to investigate the mediating role of Brain Age Gap (BAG) in the association between hearing impairment and cognitive function. This research included 185 participants aged 20-79 years. BAG was estimated based on the difference between participant's brain age (estimated based on their structural T1-weighted MRI scans) and chronological age. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test while hearing ability was measured using pure-tone thresholds (PTT) and words-in-noise (WIN) perception. Mediation analyses were used to examine the mediating role of BAG in the relationship between age-related hearing loss as well as difficulties in WIN perception and cognition. Participants with poorer hearing sensitivity and WIN perception showed lower MoCA scores, but this was an indirect effect. Participants with poorer performance on PTT and WIN tests had larger BAG (accelerated brain aging), and this was associated with poorer performance on the MoCA test. Mediation analyses showed that BAG partially mediated the relationship between age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline. This study enhances our understanding of the interplay among hearing loss, cognition, and BAG, emphasizing the potential value of incorporating brain age assessments in clinical evaluations to gain insights beyond chronological age, thus advancing strategies for preserving cognitive health in aging populations.

A genome-wide association study reveals a polygenic architecture of speech-in-noise deficits in individuals with self-reported normal hearing

Speech-in-noise (SIN) perception is a primary complaint of individuals with audiometric hearing loss. SIN performance varies drastically, even among individuals with normal hearing. The present genome-wide association study (GWAS) investigated the genetic basis of SIN deficits in individuals with self-reported normal hearing in quiet situations. GWAS was performed on 279,911 individuals from the UB Biobank cohort, with 58,847 reporting SIN deficits despite reporting normal hearing in quiet. GWAS identified 996 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), achieving significance (p < 5*10-8) across four genomic loci. 720 SNPs across 21 loci achieved suggestive significance (p < 10-6). GWAS signals were enriched in brain tissues, such as the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, entorhinal cortex, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and inferior temporal cortex. Cochlear cell types revealed no significant association with SIN deficits. SIN deficits were associated with various health traits, including neuropsychiatric, sensory, cognitive, metabolic, cardiovascular, and inflammatory conditions. A replication analysis was conducted on 242 healthy young adults. Self-reported speech perception, hearing thresholds (0.25-16 kHz), and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (1-16 kHz) were utilized for the replication analysis. 73 SNPs were replicated with a self-reported speech perception measure. 211 SNPs were replicated with at least one and 66 with at least two audiological measures. 12 SNPs near or within MAPT, GRM3, and HLA-DQA1 were replicated for all audiological measures. The present study highlighted a polygenic architecture underlying SIN deficits in individuals with self-reported normal hearing.

Measure of Auditory Working Memory Span Using Monosyllabic Word Recognition Test in Young Adults With Normal Hearing: A Preliminary Study

PURPOSE

Measuring working memory at hearing clinics is important. This study attempted to develop a test protocol that measures auditory working memory using a standardized monosyllabic word list in Korean Speech Audiometry (KSA).

METHOD

We included 25 young adults with normal hearing in this study. Participants conducted word recognition and word span tests concurrently using the KSA monosyllabic word lists. We designed four test conditions according to the presence or absence of background noise and word recall order: quiet-forward (QF), quiet-backward (QB), noise-forward, (NF), and noise-backward (NB). We implemented digit span tests in the Korean Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV (K-WAIS-IV) to determine the validity of the working memory outcomes.

RESULTS

Word recognition scores of QF and QB were significantly higher than those of NF and NB. The percentages of correctly recalled words and word recall span scores were highest in QF and lowest in NB. Overall, the Pearson correlation and multiple regression statistics showed that our word span test outcomes for QB and NF were highly associated with digit span scores on the K-WAIS-IV.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed test protocol showed the possibility of measuring auditory working memory and monosyllabic word recognition simultaneously by validating the results with K-WAIS-IV outcomes.

Relationships Between Auditory Processing and Cognitive Abilities in Adults: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The contributions from the central auditory and cognitive systems play a major role in communication. Understanding the relationship between auditory and cognitive abilities has implications for auditory rehabilitation for clinical patients. The purpose of this systematic review is to address the question, "In adults, what is the relationship between central auditory processing abilities and cognitive abilities?"

METHOD

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed to identify, screen, and determine eligibility for articles that addressed the research question of interest. Medical librarians and subject matter experts assisted in search strategy, keyword review, and structuring the systematic review process. To be included, articles needed to have an auditory measure (either behavioral or electrophysiologic), a cognitive measure that assessed individual ability, and the measures needed to be compared to one another.

RESULTS

Following two rounds of identification and screening, 126 articles were included for full analysis. Central auditory processing (CAP) measures were grouped into categories (behavioral: speech in noise, altered speech, temporal processing, binaural processing; electrophysiologic: mismatch negativity, P50, N200, P200, and P300). The most common CAP measures were sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and the P300. Cognitive abilities were grouped into constructs, and the most common construct was working memory. The findings were mixed, encompassing both significant and nonsignificant relationships; therefore, the results do not conclusively establish a direct link between CAP and cognitive abilities. Nonetheless, several consistent relationships emerged across different domains. Distorted or noisy speech was related to working memory or processing speed. Auditory temporal order tasks showed significant relationships with working memory, fluid intelligence, or multidomain cognitive measures. For electrophysiology, relationships were observed between some cortical evoked potentials and working memory or executive/inhibitory processes. Significant results were consistent with the hypothesis that assessments of CAP and cognitive processing would be positively correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this systematic review summarize relationships between CAP and cognitive processing, but also underscore the complexity of these constructs, the importance of study design, and the need to select an appropriate measure. The relationship between auditory and cognitive abilities is complex but can provide informative context when creating clinical management plans. This review supports a need to develop guidelines and training for audiologists who wish to consider individual central auditory and cognitive abilities in patient care.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24855174.

Speech-in-noise performance in objectively determined cochlear implant maps, including the effect of cognitive state

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear Implant (CI) programming based on subjective psychophysical fine-tuning of loudness scaling involves active participation and cognitive skills and thus may not be appropriate for difficult-to-condition populations. The electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) is an objective measure that is suggested to provide clinical benefit to CI programming. This study aimed to compare speech reception outcomes between subjective and eSRT objectively determined CI maps for adult MED-EL recipients. The effect of cognitive skills on these skills was further assessed.

METHODS

Twenty-seven post lingually hearing-impaired MED-EL CI recipients were recruited, 6 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI- 4 male, 79 years ± 5), 21 with normal cognitive function (5 male, 63 years ± 12). Two MAPs were generated: a subjective MAP and an objective MAP in which eSRTs determined maximum comfortable levels (M-Levels). Participants were randomly divided into two groups. Group A trialled the objective MAP for two weeks before returning for outcome assessment. During the following two weeks, Group A trialled the subjective MAP before returning for outcome assessment. Group B trialled MAPs in reverse. Outcome measures included the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI), Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word test, and Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise (BKB-SIN) test.

RESULTS

eSRT based MAPS were obtained in 23 of the participants. A strong relationship was demonstrated between global charge between eSRT-based and psychophysical-based M-Levels (r = 0.89, p < .001). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the Hearing Impaired (MoCA-HI) testing identified 6 CI recipients with MCI (MoCA-HI total score ≤23). The MCI group was older (63, 79 years), but were not otherwise different in sex, duration of hearing loss or duration of CI use. For all patients, no significant differences were found for sound quality or speech in quiet scores between eSRT-based and psychophysical-based MAPs. However, psychophysically determined MAPs showed significantly better speech-in-noise reception (6.74 vs 8.20-dB SNR, p = .34). MoCA-HI scores showed a significant, moderate negative correlation with BKB SIN for both MAP approaches (Kendall's Tau B, p = .015 and p = .008), with no effect on the difference between MAP approaches.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate eSRT-based methods provide poorer outcomes than psychophysical-based method. While speech-in-noise reception is correlated with MoCA-HI score, this affected both behaviourally and objectively determined MAPs. The results suggest fair confidence in the eSRT-based method as a guide for setting M-Level for difficult-to-condition CI populations in simple listening conditions.

Understanding the Relationship Between Age-Related Hearing Loss and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Narrative Review

Evidence suggests that hearing loss (HL), even at mild levels, increases the long-term risk of cognitive decline and incident dementia. Hearing loss is one of the modifiable risk factors for dementia, with approximately 4 million of the 50 million cases of dementia worldwide possibly attributed to untreated HL. This paper describes four possible mechanisms that have been suggested for the relationship between age-related hearing loss (ARHL) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which is the most common form of dementia. The first mechanism suggests mitochondrial dysfunction and altered signal pathways due to aging as a possible link between ARHL and AD. The second mechanism proposes that sensory degradation in hearing impaired people could explain the relationship between ARHL and AD. The occupation of cognitive resource (third) mechanism indicates that the association between ARHL and AD is a result of increased cognitive processing that is required to compensate for the degraded sensory input. The fourth mechanism is an expansion of the third mechanism, i.e., the function and structure interaction involves both cognitive resource occupation (neural activity) and AD pathology as the link between ARHL and AD. Exploring the specific mechanisms that provide the link between ARHL and AD has the potential to lead to innovative ideas for the diagnosis, prevention, and/or treatment of AD. This paper also provides insight into the current evidence for the use of hearing treatments as a possible treatment/prevention for AD, and if auditory assessments could provide an avenue for early detection of cognitive impairment associated with AD.

Spoken Word Recognition in Listeners with Mild Dementia Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Difficulty understanding speech is a common complaint of older adults. In quiet, speech perception is often assumed to be relatively automatic. However, higher-level cognitive processes play a key role in successful communication in noise. Limited cognitive resources in adults with dementia may therefore hamper word recognition.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the impact of mild dementia on spoken word recognition in quiet and noise.

METHODS

Participants were 53-86 years with (n = 16) or without (n = 32) dementia symptoms as classified by the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. Participants performed a word identification task with two levels of word difficulty (few and many similar sounding words) in quiet and in noise at two signal-to-noise ratios, +6 and +3 dB. Our hypothesis was that listeners with mild dementia symptoms would have more difficulty with speech perception in noise under conditions that tax cognitive resources.

RESULTS

Listeners with mild dementia symptoms had poorer task accuracy in both quiet and noise, which held after accounting for differences in age and hearing level. Notably, even in quiet, adults with dementia symptoms correctly identified words only about 80% of the time. However, word difficulty was not a factor in task performance for either group.

CONCLUSION

These results affirm the difficulty that listeners with mild dementia may have with spoken word recognition, both in quiet and in background noise, consistent with a role of cognitive resources in spoken word identification.

Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Benefit From Audiovisual Speech Cues and Supportive Sentence Context

Purpose Speech perception in noise becomes difficult with age but can be facilitated by audiovisual (AV) speech cues and sentence context in healthy older adults. However, individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may present with deficits in AV integration, potentially limiting the extent to which they can benefit from AV cues. This study investigated the benefit of these cues in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), individuals with AD, and healthy older adult controls. Method This study compared auditory-only and AV speech perception of sentences presented in noise. These sentences had one of two levels of context: high (e.g., "Stir your coffee with a spoon") and low (e.g., "Bob didn't think about the spoon"). Fourteen older controls (M _age = 72.71 years, SD = 9.39), 13 individuals with MCI (M _age = 79.92 years, SD = 5.52), and nine individuals with probable Alzheimer's-type dementia (M _age = 79.38 years, SD = 3.40) completed the speech perception task and were asked to repeat the terminal word of each sentence. Results All three groups benefited (i.e., identified more terminal words) from AV and sentence context. Individuals with MCI showed a smaller AV benefit compared to controls in low-context conditions, suggesting difficulties with AV integration. Individuals with AD showed a smaller benefit in high-context conditions compared to controls, indicating difficulties with AV integration and context use in AD. Conclusions Individuals with MCI and individuals with AD do benefit from AV speech and semantic context during speech perception in noise (albeit to a lower extent than healthy older adults). This suggests that engaging in face-to-face communication and providing ample context will likely foster more effective communication between patients and caregivers, professionals, and loved ones.