Correlation between hepatitis B surface antigen titers and HBV DNA levels

Pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B virus infection at the assessment of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate prescription: Baseline characteristics of a prospective cohort study in Vietnam

Objectives

We aimed to determine epidemiological characteristics and serologic markers among chronically hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected pregnant women during the assessment of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) prescription in Vietnam.

Methods

We consecutively recruited 375 pregnant women with chronic HBV (cHBV) infection at week 25±2 of pregnancy, at which time they were assessed for TDF use as pre-prophylaxis and/or pre-treatment at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in southern Vietnam during December 2019-April 2021. Demographic characteristics, serological biomarkers, and prenatal liver ultrasounds were obtained through interviews and reviews of medical records.

Results

The median age of pregnant women was 29 years (interquartile range: 26-32). More than half of pregnant women (208/375; 55.5%) started TDF for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HBV and/or treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Among the pregnant women initiating TDF, 96.1% (198/206) tested positive for hepatitis B e antigen, and 21.6% (45/208) had quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) ≤104 IU/mL. A relatively strong correlation between qHBsAg and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (r = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.85) was observed in pregnant women starting TDF.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the high need for TDF prescription for prevention and/or treatment purposes in pregnant women with cHBV infection. Pregnant women with qHBsAg levels ≤104 IU/mL may prioritize HBV DNA testing over qHBsAg to decide on TDF prescription.

The performance of hepatitis B surface antigen quantification as a noninvasive biomarker predicting liver injury and serum hepatitis B virus DNA level

OBJECTIVES

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is still a major public health problem worldwide. Recently, evidence indicating that serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification can be used for monitorization of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been increased. In this study, we evaluated HBsAg levels during the natural course of CHB and identified correlations between HBsAg, HBV DNA levels and liver histopathology.

METHODS

From 6 August 2016 to 7 June 2017, naive patients, who are ≥18 years old, fulfilled the criteria for the diagnosis of CHB and had a liver biopsy within a year before or after admission, were included. HBsAg levels in serum samples were investigated by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Results were correlated with serum HBV DNA levels, histologic activity index (HAI) and fibrosis scores.

RESULTS

In this study 66 patients were included. There was a moderate and significant correlation between HBsAg levels and fibrosis scores (r = 0.386, P = 0.001), but no correlation with HAI. Serum HBsAg levels showed a positive, strong and significant (r = 0.740, P < 0.001) correlation with HBV DNA levels. In hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients, serum HBsAg levels were perfectly correlated with HBV DNA levels (r = 0.992, P < 0.001) and moderately correlated with fibrosis scores (r = 0.360, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

We found a positive correlation between serum HBsAg levels and the severity of fibrosis scores and serum HBV DNA levels. These findings suggest that serum HBsAg quantification might be a useful noninvasive diagnostic test for the prediction of fibrosis severity and HBV DNA level.

Evaluation and Determination of Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Diagnostic Performance in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus-Infected Patients

Background Hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA) assessment is recommended for diagnosing and monitoring chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) estimation adjunct to HBV-DNA is vital for assessing HBV chronicity and therapeutic prognosis. This study aimed to estimate the qHBsAg and compare its diagnostic performance with that of the HBV-DNA levels in CHB patients from Bangladesh. Methodology A total of 148 CHB patients were enrolled in this study. qHBsAg and hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) were estimated using chemiluminescent and enzyme immunoassays, respectively, and HBV-DNA was quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The parameters and diagnostic performances were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The overall levels (mean ± SD) of qHBsAg, HBV-DNA, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) among the total population (n = 148) were 3.45 ± 0.80 log₁₀ IU/mL, 4.40 ± 2.44 log₁₀ IU/mL, and 86.17 ± 39.06 IU/L, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the levels of both qHBsAg (p = 0.004) and HBV-DNA (p < 0.0001) in cases with HBeAg positivity. qHBsAg levels showed a weak positive correlation with the levels of HBV-DNA and ALT in HBeAg-positive CHB patients, but no such relationship was observed in HBeAg-negative CHB patients. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve for the qHBsAg level to distinguish high HBV-DNA levels (>5 log₁₀ IU/mL) was 0.653 (p = 0.002), which indicated an acceptable diagnostic performance. The best cut-off of qHBsAg for predicting high HBV-DNA levels was 3.469 log₁₀ IU/mL. Conclusions Our results indicated that qHBsAg might be a useful marker for monitoring HBV-DNA in CHB patients throughout treatment and follow-up.

A Predictive Model to Evaluate the HbeAg Positivity of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Patients in Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Objective: The study aims to investigate the correlation between Hepatitis B ‘e’ antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA levels, and to find a convenient tool to estimate the HBV DNA level for clinicians. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 1020 patients in this cross-sectional study and divided them into four groups: an HbeAg-positive and -negative group, and high and low HBV DNA levels groups. Results: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Albumin (ALB) and HBeAg are independent risk factors for CHB patients. When the level of HBeAg is higher than 16.15 S/CO, it is four times more likely that the patients will have high levels of HBV DNA than those who do not. The ALT and TB are independent risk factors in HBeAg-negative patients with a high HBV DNA level. We have drawn three predictive models to estimate the HBV DNA levels for those with the chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB), and those that are HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative (Y1 = 0.004 × ALT(IU/L) + 1.412 × HBeAg (S/CO) − 0.029 × ALB (g/L) + 0.779, the AUC is 0.672, and the cutoff value is −0.072, there the sensitivity is 0.615, the specificity is 0.648, PPV is 65.182% and NPV is 60.837%; Y2 = 0.007 × HBeAg (S/CO) − 0.016 × HGB (g/L) + 3.070, the AUC is 0.724, and the cutoff value is 1.216, where the sensitivity is 0.626, the specificity is 0.897, PPV is 94.118% and NPV is 34.437%; Y3 = −0.005 × ALT(IU/L) + 0.006 × TB (umol/L) + 0.385, the AUC is 0.661, and the cutoff value is 0.263, where the sensitivity is 0.677, the specificity is 0.587, PPV is 66.820% and NPV is 40.774%, respectively). We propose that HBeAg is the most important risk factor for the patient with a high HBV DNA level, however, it is not as important in the HBeAg-positive group. Conclusions: HBeAg is an independent risk factor that reflects the level of HBV DNA with a strong correlation. Patient with HBeAg (−) should combine TB and ALT to estimate the level of HBV DNA.

Use of a Deep Learning Approach for the Sensitive Prediction of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Levels in Inactive Carrier Patients

Deep learning is a subset of machine learning that can be employed to accurately predict biological transitions. Eliminating hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAgs) is the final therapeutic endpoint for chronic hepatitis B. Reliable predictors of the disappearance or reduction in HBsAg levels have not been established. Accurate predictions are vital to successful treatment, and corresponding efforts are ongoing worldwide. Therefore, this study aimed to identify an optimal deep learning model to predict the changes in HBsAg levels in daily clinical practice for inactive carrier patients. We identified patients whose HBsAg levels were evaluated over 10 years. The results of routine liver biochemical function tests, including serum HBsAg levels for 1, 2, 5, and 10 years, and biometric information were obtained. Data of 90 patients were included for adaptive training. The predictive models were built based on algorithms set up by SONY Neural Network Console, and their accuracy was compared using statistical analysis. Multiple regression analysis revealed a mean absolute percentage error of 58%, and deep learning revealed a mean absolute percentage error of 15%; thus, deep learning is an accurate predictive discriminant tool. This study demonstrated the potential of deep learning algorithms to predict clinical outcomes.

SASLT practice guidelines for the management of Hepatitis B virus - An update

Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains an important public health problem with a high burden worldwide. The Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation formed a working group to develop HBV practice guidelines in Saudi Arabia. The methodology used to develop these guidelines was based on reviewing the available evidence, local data, and major international practice guidelines on the management of HBV. The aim of these guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in the management of HBV in Saudi Arabia. These updated guidelines summarize the latest local studies performed on HBV epidemiology, major changes in the prevalence of this virus, and advances in disease management.

The role of quantitative HBsAg in patients with HBV DNA between 2000-20,000 IU/ml

AIMS

We aimed to determine the contribution of quantitative HBsAg in differentiating chronic infections from chronic hepatitis in HBeAg negative patients with HBV DNA 2000-20,000 IU/ml.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 79 untreated HBeAg negative patients were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on HBV DNA levels: group 1 (HBV DNA ≤ 2000 IU/ml), group 2 (HBV DNA: 2000-20,000 IU/ml) and group 3 (HBV DNA > 20,000 IU/ml). We collected serum from all patients for quantitative HBsAg analysis. We compared serum quantitative HBsAg levels with biochemical parameters, HBV DNA and liver biopsy results.

RESULTS

In this study 46 patients were female and the mean age was 42 years. Serum quantitative HBsAg levels were found to be significantly lower in chronic infections compared with chronic hepatitis. There was a positive correlation between quantitative HBsAg and HBV DNA, ALT (alanine aminotransferase), HAI score (histological activity index), fibrosis score and disease stage. The cut-off level of quantitative HBsAg was determined as 4425 IU/ml to differentiate chronic infection from chronic hepatitis. With the test specificity of 95%, we found quantitative HBsAg cut-off values 1026 IU/ml and 20,346 IU/ml for the diagnosis of chronic infection and chronic hepatitis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the quantitative HBsAg ≤ 1000 IU/ml limit value might be used for the diagnosis of chronic infection not only in HBV DNA ≤ 2000 IU/ml but also in patients with HBV DNA between 2000-20,000 IU/ml. In addition, antiviral treatment could be considered in patients with quantitative HBsAg > 20,000 IU/ml and HBV DNA > 2000 IU/ml without further examinations such as liver biopsy.

The role of quantitative HBsAg in the natural history of e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: A Tunisian prospective study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

During the natural course of Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) infection, differentiation between inactive carrier (IC) and HBeAg negative CHB is a subject of ongoing debate. We studied the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level as a means of differentiating between CHB and IC in a group of untreated chronic HBeAg-negative HBV-infected patients.

STUDY

A total of 115 HBeAg negative carriers were enrolled and followed up for>12 months; 78 as inactive carriers (IC), and 37 as active carriers (AC). Among ACs, patients were categorized according to the highest rate of viral load: AC1 (n=23), active carriers with persistent HBV-DNA<20,000 IU/mL; AC2 (n=14), active carriers with HBV-DNA>20,000 IU/mL.

RESULTS

HBsAg levels were higher in AC compared to IC patients (1607 IU/ml vs. 225 IU/ml respectively, P=0.001). Among the AC group, the 23 AC1 cases had HBsAg levels significantly lower than the 14 AC2 patients (1756 IU/mL vs. 3327 IU/mL respectively; P<10^-3). HBsAg showed weak correlation with HBV-DNA in the whole cohort (r=0.44, P<0.01). The suggested cutoff value of HBsAg titer to differentiate between the two groups was 938 IU/mL. Combined single-point quantification of HBsAg (938 IU/mL) and HBV DNA (2000 IU/mL) identified IC with 87.2% specificity and 91.7% positive predictive value.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the predictability of a one-time combined HBsAg and HBV DNA measurement for true inactive carriers requiring neither strict follow-up nor antiviral treatment.

Quantitative HBsAg and Qualitative HBeAg Predicts Intrauterine Placental Infection and Umbilical Blood Cord in Pregnant Women

Objective: To know the correlation between quantitative Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HbsAg) and maternal Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen (HbeAg) with hepatitis B intrauterine transmission via placental infection. Hepatitis B in pregnancy causes a mother to child transmission (MTCT) via transplacental route started with placental infection. HBV DNA viral load and HBeAg are the independent risk factors for MTCT, but it rarely available in developing country.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study in 33 pregnant women with HbsAg positive in 4 referral hospital in East Java, Indonesia. Quantitative HBS Ag and HBeAg) status were determined serologically from a peripheral venous blood sample. Placental Hepatitis B infection was detected by immunohistochemistry of HBsAg from placental tissues. The intrauterine transmission was diagnosed by positive HBsAg in cord blood sampling after deliveries.

Results: Serum quantitative HBsAg level has a good sensitivity and spesificity to predict placental infection (90% and 83%), with a cut off value of 3.14 Log10 IU/mL (AUC 0.87; 95% CI: 0.74-0.99). Quantitative HBsAg level also has a good sensitivity and spesificity to predict HBV transmission in umbilical blood cord (81.8% and 95.5%) with a cut off value of 3.62 log₁₀ IU/ml (AUC: 0.925, 95% CI: 0.813-1; p = 0.000). Placental infection is significantly related with intrauterine transmission with OR 4.6 (95% CI 2.29-9.4; p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The study reveals that maternal serum quantitative HBsAg level can be used as an alternative test to substitute HBeAg or HBV DNA as a marker to predict the placental infection and intrauterine transmission, especially in low-middle income countries.

Consolidation period of 18 months no better at promoting off-treatment durability in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment than a 12-month period: A prospective randomized cohort study

There has been no clear consensus on the optimal consolidation periods following HBeAg seroconversion (SC) in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Our study aimed to prospectively compare relapse rates between 12 months' and 18 months' consolidation periods to see whether or not there is beneficial durability of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy with longer consolidation periods.We enrolled a total of 137 HBeAg-positive Asian CHB patients treated with TDF monotherapy. Forty-six patients achieved HBeAg SC. Then, they were randomly assigned to consolidation period of either 12 months (group A) or 18 months (group B). After stopping TDF therapy, all patients were followed up for 12 months.Thirteen patients (56.5%) relapsed in group A and 12 patients (52.2%) relapsed in group B after 12 months' follow-up (P = .958). Pretreatment HBsAg level is the only significant predictor for off-therapy recurrence by univariate analysis (P = .024). Baseline HBeAg >1000 S/CO in group B patients were significantly less likely to relapse than those of group A (P = .046). Baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >133 U/L could significantly predict occurrence of HBeAg SC (P = .008; 95% CI: 0.545-0.763; AUC: 0.654).Overall, a prolonged consolidation period has no positive effect on TDF therapy on sustained viral suppression in HBeAg-positive Asian CHB patients. However, a prolonged consolidation period was beneficial to patients with high baseline semi-quantitative HBeAg levels in terms of off-treatment durability. Baseline ALT > 133 U/L could significantly predict the occurrence of HBeAg SC.

Quantitative HBsAg levels do not identify hepatic fibrosis in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) has been evaluated in limited patient groups as a marker of histological fibrosis. The accurate identification of inactive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers from those with active carriers is difficult because of wide and frequent HBV DNA fluctuations. We aimed to assess the utility of qHBsAg in distinguishing histologically significant fibrosis in untreated HBeAg-negative chronic HBV patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

qHBsAg levels were measured at baseline as single-point quantification and correlated with virologic and biochemical profiles of consecutive carriers (median, 29; range, 12-110 months). HBeAg-negative patients (n = 75) with HBV DNA <2000 (n = 5), 2000-20,000 (n = 16) and >20,000 IU/mL (n = 54) were included and all had liver biopsy. A qHBsAg cutoff point of 1000 IU/mL was assessed to demonstrate whether it better delineated patients with non-significant histology (F0-1, inflammatory grade A0-1).

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 39.4 ± 11.4 years and 58 (77.3%) were male. Patients with qHBsAg levels >1000 IU/mL were more likely to be males (84.5%, P = 0.006) or with elevated AST (68.4%, P = 0.0002) and ALT levels (72.4%, P < 0.0001), higher HBV DNA (log₁₀ 6.4 ± 1.4, P < 0.0001) and those with F2-4 fibrosis (48.3%, P = 0.028). Serum log₁₀ qHBsAg were significantly lower in patients with HBV DNA <2000 (2.80 ± 1.47) and HBV DNA 2000-20,000 (2.71 ± 0.83) vs. >20,000 IU/mL (3.89 ± 0.61, P < 0.0001). Overall, qHBsAg were not different in patients with F0-1 (3.44 ± 0.91) and F2-4 fibrosis (3.74 ± 0.85, P = 0.161). Serum qHBsAg were higher in patients with significant (A2-3) inflammation (3.85 ± 0.72) compared to A0-1 (3.38 ± 0.95; P = 0.018). Serum qHBsAg demonstrated poor accuracy (AUROC, 0.61, P = 0.111) in identification of F2-4 fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Serum qHBsAg levels do not help differentiate between those with HBV DNA <2000 or 2000 - 20,000 IU/mL or distinguish patients with significant fibrosis. Moreover, more than half of the patients with non-significant fibrosis have a qHBsAg level greater than 1000 IU/mL.

Quantification of large and middle proteins of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) as a novel tool for the identification of inactive HBV carriers

OBJECTIVE

Among individuals with chronic hepatitis B, those with hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis (CHB) can be difficult to distinguish from those with HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection, also referred to as inactive HBV carriers (ICs), but both require different medical management. The level of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) has been proposed as a marker to discriminate between chronic infection and hepatitis stages. HBsAg consists of large, middle and small HBs. The aim of this study was to determine whether the composition of HBsAg improved the identification of ICs among HBsAg-positive subjects with different phases of HBV infections.

DESIGN

HBV large surface proteins (LHBs) and HBV middle surface proteins (MHBs) were quantified in serum samples from 183 clinically well-characterised untreated patients with acute (n=14) HBV infection, ICs (n=44), CHBs (n=46), chronic HBeAg-positive phase (n=68) and hepatitis delta coinfection (n=11) using an ELISA, with well-defined monoclonal antibodies against the preS1 domain (LHBs) and the preS2-domain (MHBs). A Western blot analysis was used to verify the quantitation of the components of HBsAg. Total HBsAg was quantified using a modified commercially available assay (HBsAg V.6.0, Enzygnost, Siemens, Erlangen).

RESULTS

The composition of HBsAg showed specific patterns across different phases of hepatitis B. Individuals in the IC phase had significantly lower proportions of LHBs and MHBs than patients in acute or chronic phases irrespective of their HBV e-antigen status (p<0.0001) or HBsAg level. Both LHBs and MHBs ratios better predicted the IC phase than total HBsAg levels.

CONCLUSION

Quantification of MHBs, particularly LHBs represents a novel tool for the identification of the IC stage.

Serum HBeAg and HBV DNA levels are not always proportional and only high levels of HBeAg most likely correlate with high levels of HBV DNA: A community-based study

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between quantitative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, and to determine whether semiquantitative measurement of HBeAg can indicate the extent of HBV replication in HBeAg-positive subjects in the immune tolerant phase.A cross-sectional, community-based survey was carried out in 12 communities of 2 counties in Zhejiang Province, China. A panel of 788 HBeAg-positive subjects was divided into 4 groups according to HBV DNA level.Groups I (n = 111), II (n = 91), III (n = 124), and IV (n = 462) had HBV DNA levels below 10 copies/mL (PCR undetectable), between 10 and 10 copies/mL (PCR detectable), between 10 and 2 × 10 copies/mL (hybridization detectable), and >2 × 10 copies/mL, respectively. The HBeAg level correlated well with the HBV DNA level (R = 0.658; P < .01) on a log scale. The average HBeAg level in group IV was significantly higher than those in the other 3 groups, and the best HBeAg cut-off value for differentiating group IV from the other 3 groups was 768 S/CO, with a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 91.1%.Semiquantification of HBeAg could indicate a relative HBV DNA level in HBeAg-positive subjects in the immune tolerant phase.

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and CD4 epitope mutations in the pre-core/core region of hepatitis B virus in chronic hepatitis B carriers in Northeast Iran

BACKGROUNDS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is vulnerable to many various mutations. Those within epitopes recognized by sensitized T cells may influence the re-emergence of the virus. This study was designed to investigate the mutation in immune epitope regions of HBV pre-core/core among chronic HBV patients of Golestan province, Northeast Iran.

METHODS

In 120 chronic HBV carriers, HBV DNA was extracted from blood plasma samples and PCR was done using specific primers. Direct sequencing and alignment of the pre-core/core region were applied using reference sequence from Gene Bank database (Accession Number AB033559).

RESULTS

The study showed 27 inferred amino acid substitutions, 9 of which (33.3%) were in CD4 and 2 (7.4%) in cytotoxic T lymphocytes' (CTL) epitopes and 16 other mutations (59.2%) were observed in other regions.

CONCLUSIONS

CTL escape mutations were not commonly observed in pre-core/core sequences of chronic HBV carriers in the locale of study. It can be concluded that most of the inferred amino acid substitutions occur in different immune epitopes other than CTL and CD4.

Analytical performance of three diagnostic reagents for HBsAg on an automatic ELISA analyzer

PURPOSE

We conducted performance tests of three HBsAg ELISA diagnostic reagents using an Addcare 600 (Yantai Addcare Bio-tech Limited Company) and studied the consistency between the qualitative results and chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) results.

METHODS

Diagnostic kits (ELISA) for HBsAg manufactured by INTEC ("A"), KHB ("B") and Wantai ("C") were tested on an Addcare 600 to evaluate their intermediate precision, repeatability, and C50. Furthermore, three ELISA detection systems and a quantitative test kit for HBsAg (Abbott) were employed to screen 1000 serum samples, while CMIA reactive samples were used to perform the confirmatory tests. The evaluation indexes of the ELISA reagent performances were calculated.

RESULTS

The intermediate precision and repeatability of each system were <14% and <9%, respectively, while C50 was 0.105-0.115 IU/mL. The sensitivities of A, B, and C were 98.70%, 99.28%, and 99.13%, respectively, while their specificities were 98.06%, 99.03%, and 97.42%, respectively. The Youden indexes were 96.76%, 98.31%, and 96.55%, respectively, while the kappa values were 0.965 (P=.000), 0.981 (P=.000), and 0.967 (P=.000), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of Addcare 600 with the three reagents could meet the clinical requirement. Reagent B demonstrated the best performance. Although the results consistency among the three systems and CMIA was good, our findings suggest that ELISA should be combined with a confirmatory test to exclude false-positive and false-negative results caused by low HBsAg levels.

HBV COVALENTLY CLOSED CIRCULAR DNA AS A MARKER OF PREVALENCE OF OCCULT HEPATITIS В IN PATIENTS WITH HBV, HDV AND HCV INFECTION IN UZBEKISTAN

Aim. Evaluate significance of covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis В virus as a marker for detection of occult viral hepatitis В in Uzbekistan population with hepatitis of various genesis. Materials and methods. Blood plasma and liver biopsy from 39 patients with different severity levels of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis served as study material. HBV covalently closed circular DNA detection was carried out according to Pollicino T. et al. (2004). Results. Covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis В virus was detected in 82% of samples, including in 54.5% of patients with chronic viral hepatitis C (CVHC) and in 100% of patients with hepatitis of unknown etiology. Quantitative evaluation of content of covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis В virus in liver tissue in patients with CVHB has shown an average of 2.5 copies of HBV genome as ccc DNA per cell, in patients with CVHB + D an average of 0.7 copies/cell, in patients with co-infection by HCV and HBV - 0.5 copies/cell, in patients with CVHC an average of 0.12 copies/cell, and in patients with cryptogenic hepatitis - 0.2 copies/cell. Conclusion. Detection of HBV DNA is a complex problem for effective laboratory diagnostics of hepatitis. Detection of H BV ccc DNA as a marker of occult hepatitis В in patients with CVHC and patients with hepatitis of unclear etiology is an important factor for diagnostics, selection of adequate therapy, prognosis of disease outcome and prevention of development of severe liver diseases.

The correlation between serum HBsAg levels and viral loads depends upon wild-type and mutated HBV sequences rather than the HBeAg/anti-HBe status

Despite several studies regarding the correlation between serum HBsAg titers and viral loads, the association remains uncertain. Eighty‐nine individuals were selected randomly from a Chinese cohort of 2,258 subjects infected persistently with hepatitis B virus (HBV) for cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis. Viral loads of mutant HBV are lower than those of wild type HBV. The serum HBsAg titers correlate positively with viral loads in both HBeAg positive and negative subjects (r = 0.449, P = 0.013; r = 0.300, P = 0.018, respectively). No correlation between serum HBsAg titer and viral loads was found in any of the four phases of chronic HBV infection. The serum HBsAg titers correlate positively with viral loads in the group with wild type sequences of the PreS/S, basal core promoter (BCP), and preC regions of HBV(r = 0.502, P = 0.040). However, the correlation was not seen in the group with mutations in these regions (r = 0.165, P = 0.257). The correlation between HBsAg titers and viral loads was seen in individuals with wild type PreS/S sequences but not in the subgroup with BCP double mutations or PreC stop mutation, although their sequences in the preS/S regions were wild type. All these findings were confirmed by the longitudinal analysis. In conclusion, the correlation between serum HBsAg levels and viral loads may not differ between HBeAg positive and negative individuals but may depend on wild‐type or mutated genomic sequences. Therefore, HBsAg quantitation may be used as a surrogate for viral loads in only wild‐type HBV infections. J. Med. Virol. 87:1351–1360, 2015. © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Association of Mutations in the Basal Core Promoter and Pre-core Regions of the Hepatitis B Viral Genome and Longitudinal Changes in HBV Level in HBeAg Negative Individuals: Results From a Cohort Study in Northern Iran

BACKGROUND

Although certain HBV mutations are known to affect the expression of Hepatitis e antigen, their association with HBV viral level or clinical outcomes is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated associations between different mutations in the Basal Core promoter (BCP) and Pre-core (PC) regions of HBV genome and subsequent changes in HBV viral DNA level over seven years in a population of untreated HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) participants in Northeast of Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants in the current study were drawn from the Golestan Hepatitis B Cohort Study (GHBCS), a cohort of approximately 2590 HBsAg positive subjects (living in Gonbad city) embedded in the Golestan Cohort Study (GCS). At baseline, HBsAg was measured in all participants and revealed 2590 HBsAg positive cases. We randomly selected 304 participants who their blood sample were taken at both baseline and seven years later in follow-up and had not been treated for HBV during this time. HBV viral load were assessed at baseline and at year 7. The BCP and PC regions of the HBV DNA, at baseline, were amplified via hemi-nested PCR and sequenced by cycle sequencing. At year 7, liver stiffness was assessed by fibroscan; also, other parameters of liver disease were assessed following standard clinical protocols. Associations were assessed via tabulation, chi-square, t-tests and logistic regression. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant and all tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Among 304 HBsAg positive participants, 99 had detectable HBV DNA at study baseline. Of these, 61.6% had PC mutations (48.5% A1896 and 25.2% G1899). In contrast to other mutations, A1896 was associated with a higher proportion of detectable HBV DNA at year 7 (39.6%) compared to patients with the wild type (13.7%) (OR: 4.36, CI95% = 1.63-11.70; P Value = 0.002). Although participants with the A1896 mutation had higher year-7 HBV viral load than participants with G1896 (2.30 ± 1.66 IU/mL vs. 1.76 ± 1 IU/mL among patients with detectable HBV; P value = 0.052), no association was observed with either serum level ALT or liver stiffness. Interestingly, mutations in the basal core promoter (BCP) region had no significant effect on virus DNA detection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population with chronic HBeAg negative hepatitis B, an association was observed between the G1896A mutation in the Pre-core region of HBV and subsequent level of HBV DNA seven years later, which indicated that mutations in this region of HBV genome may contribute to disease progression in these patients and play an important role in HBV natural course of disease.

Can serum level of HBsAg differentiate HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B from inactive carrier state?

Hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)-negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection exerts both inactive carrier (IC) state and chronic hepatitis B (CHB), which are sometimes difficult to be differentiated. We aimed to assess the role of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level in differentiation of CHB and IC among a group of chronic HBeAg-negative HBV-infected patients. A total of 251 HBeAg-negative HBV-infected patients were enrolled. Serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels were determined for each patient. HBV DNA quantification with cutoff value 2000IU/mL for diagnosis of CHB had 99.0% sensitivity and 74.1% specificity. A cutoff value of HBsAg level at 1000IU/mL was more reliable for diagnosis of CHB with 82.7% sensitivity and 66.2% specificity than other HBsAg cutoff values. There was a positive correlation between HBV DNA and HBsAg levels in both CHB (r=0.42, P<0.001) and IC (r=0.43, P<0.001) groups. Single-point HBsAg quantification did not have enough sensitivity and specificity for differentiation of HBeAg-negative CHB and IC state.