Using the Lymph Node Ratio to Evaluate the Prognosis of Stage II/III Breast Cancer Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Mastectomy

Prognosis and influencing factors of ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study

Previously, we found that patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-low breast cancer are resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and have worse outcomes than those who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis and influencing factors in these patients. A total of 618 patients with ER-positive breast cancer who received standard thrice-weekly NACT were enrolled, including 411 patients with ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer. Data on the clinicopathological features of these patients before and after NACT were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the independent factors affecting 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Among the ER-positive, HER2-low patients, 49 (11.9%) achieved a pCR after NACT. A significant difference in survival was observed between patients with and without residual disease after NACT. Additionally, changes in immunohistochemical markers and tumor stages before and after NACT were found to be significant. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, cN_stage (P = 0.002), ER (P = 0.002) and Ki67 (P = 0.023) expression before NACT were significantly associated with 5-year DFS, while pT_stage (P = 0.015), pN_stage (P = 0.029), ER (P = 0.020) and Ki67 (P < 0.001) levels after NACT were related to 5-year DFS in ER-positive, HER2-low patients with residual disease. Our study suggested that high proliferation, low ER expression and advanced stage before and after NACT are associated with a poor prognosis, providing useful information for developing long-term treatment strategies for ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer in patients with residual disease in the future.

Prognostic disparities in young patients based on breast cancer subtype: A population-based study from the SEER database

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with younger age and worse long-term survival. However, the characteristics and prognosis of different subtypes of breast cancer (BC) in young (<40 years) patients have not yet been elucidated. The present population-based study explored the clinical and pathological characteristics of young TNBC patients and investigated their long-term survival. We enrolled patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database younger than 40 years of age with primary BC. Cases were defined as patients with TNBC (hormone receptor [HR]-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), and controls were patients with other subtypes of BC (HR-/HER2+, HR+/HER2-, and HR+/HER2+). Demographic, pathological, and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery data were extracted and the overall survival was the primary endpoint. We enrolled 14,234 young patients with BC in the present study, of whom 2798 (19.7%) had TNBC and 11,436 (80.3%) had another BC subtype. A higher proportion of TNBC patients than non-TNBC patients had a more advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (II-IV 80.5% vs 73.1%, P < .001), and smaller proportions underwent radiotherapy (50.0% vs 53.3%, P = .002) and surgery (91.8% vs 92.9%, P < .001). TNBC was associated with significantly lower 5-year survival rates than other subtypes among patients with regional node positivity (0, 1-3, 4-9, ≥10: 54.2% vs 57.7%, 44.2% vs 55.9%, 31.0% vs 52.0%, and 27.7% vs 38.8%, P < .001) and those with different lymph node ratios (low, intermediate, high: 50.9% vs 56.0%, 34.6% vs 53.6%, and 24.8% vs 44.8%, P < .001). Our research is the first to investigate the relevant characteristics of young TNBC patients in comparison with those of young non-TNBC patients based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. We found that young TNBC patients have a higher pathological stage and worse long-term survival than young patients with other BC subtypes. These findings have implications in identifying young patients with TNBC for aggressive therapy and further investigations should be performed to explore new multimodal treatments for such patients.

Is Pathologic Axillary Staging Valid If Lymph Nodes Are Less than 10 with Axillary Lymph Node Dissection after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes removed in breast cancer patients who undergo axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: We included patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and cytology with proven involved axillary node metastasis at diagnosis and treated with NAC followed by curative surgery at Samsung Medical Center between January 2007 and December 2015. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 772 patients with NAC and ALND, there were 285 ypN0, 258 ypN1, 135 ypN2, and 94 ypN3 cases. The median follow-up duration was 69.0 months. The group with less than 10 lymph nodes number (<10 nodes group) included 123 patients and the group with 10 or more lymph nodes number (≥10 nodes group) included 649 patients. There were no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.501) or OS (p = 0.883) between the two groups. In the ypN0 subgroup, the <10 nodes group had worse DFS than ≥10 nodes group (p = 0.024). In the ypN1 subgroup, there were no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.846) or OS (p = 0.774) between the two groups. In the ypN2 subgroup, the <10 nodes group had worse DFS (p = 0.025) and OS (p = 0.031) than ≥10 nodes group Conclusion: In ypN0 and ypN2 subgroups, breast cancer patients with less than 10 lymph nodes number in ALND after NAC might be considered for additional staging or closer surveillance when compared to patients with 10 or more than lymph node.

Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Apical or Infraclavicular/Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes Should Be Excluded in the Application of the Lymph Node Ratio System

Aim: Increasing studies have demonstrated lymph node ratio (LNR) to be an accurate prognostic indicator in breast cancer and an alternative to pN staging; however, the AJCC-TNM staging system classified apical or infraclavicular/ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node-positive (APN(+)) patients with a worse prognosis as the pN3 stage. Until now, different reports on LNR in breast cancer have ignored this possibility. Consequently, it is necessary to discuss the role of APN(+) patients in the LNR system to obtain a precise LNR that predicts the prognosis accurately.

Materials and Methods: We collected data on 10,120 breast cancer patients, including 3,936 lymph node-positive patients (3,283 APN(−) and 653 APN(+) patients), who visited our hospital from 2007 to 2012. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate cut-off values and conduct survival analysis and multivariate analysis to evaluate patients’ prognosis.

Results: We confirmed that some APN(+) patients were mis-subgrouped according to previously reported LNR, indicating that APN(+) patients should be excluded in the application of LNR to predict prognosis. Then we applied X-tile analysis to calculate two cut-off values (0.15 and 0.34) for LNR-APN(−) patients and conducted survival analysis and found that LNR-APN(−) staging was superior to pN staging in predicting the prognosis of APN(−) breast cancer patients.

Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that excluding APN(+) patients is the most necessary condition for effective implementation of the LNR system. LNR-APN(−) staging could be a more comprehensive approach in predicting prognosis and guiding clinicians to provide accurate and appropriate treatment.

The Effect of Lymph Node Harvest on Prognosis in Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between lymph node harvest and the prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with clinical LARC and treated with nCRT and radical surgery between June 2008 and July 2017 were included in this study. The relationship between lymph node retrieval and prognosis was analyzed. Other lymph node-related indicators were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 837 patients with a median follow-up of 61 (7-139) months were included in the study. The five-year DFS and OS rates of all patients were 74.9% and 82.3%, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis suggested that dissection of ≥ 12 lymph nodes did not improve OS or DFS. 7 was selected as the best cutoff value for the total number of lymph nodes retrieved by Cox multivariate analysis (χ2 = 10.072, HR: 0.503, P=0.002). Dissection of ≥ 5 positive lymph nodes (PLNs) was an independent prognostic factor for poorer DFS (HR: 2.104, P=0.004) and OS (HR: 3.471, p<0.001). A positive lymph node ratio (LNR) of more than 0.29 was also an independent prognostic factor for poorer DFS (HR: 1.951, P=0.002) and OS (HR: 2.434, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The recommends that at least 7 harvested lymph nodes may be more appropriate for LARC patients with nCRT. PLN and LNR may be prognostic factors for LARC patients with ypN+ after nCRT.

A novel nomogram for predicting locoregional recurrence risk in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting locoregional recurrence (LRR) in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and mastectomy.

METHODS

A total of 2368 patients who received NAC and mastectomy between 2000 and 2014 from 12 grade A tertiary hospitals in China were analyzed retrospectively. The nomogram was developed based on the patients treated in three cancer hospitals (training set, n = 1629) and validated based on patients from the other nine general hospitals (validation set, n = 739). Factors identified from Fine and Gray's competing risk analysis were used to establish the nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram model was compared with the cTNM stage, ypTNM stage, and the Neo-Bioscore model by using the area under the time dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (tAUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The nomogram incorporated six risk factors derived from multivariable analysis of the training set including age, ypT stage, ypN stage, lymph node ratio, postmastectomy radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy. In the training set, the AUC of the nomogram was 0.792, which was higher than the values of the cTNM stage (0.582), ypTNM stage (0.737), and the Neo-Bioscore prognosis model (0.658). In the validation set, the AUC of the cTNM (0.619); ypTNM (0.636); and Neo-Bioscore staging system (0.584) were also significantly lower than the AUC of the nomogram (0.705). Both in the training and validation sets, the calibration curve showed good agreement between the nomogram-based predictions and the actual observations.

CONCLUSION

The novel nomogram provides a more accurate evaluation of LRR for breast cancer patients treated with NAC and mastectomy.

Lymph node ratio as best prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Although lymph node status (ypN) is one of the most important prognostic factors of survival, the lymph node ratio (LNR) has emerged as an equitable factor. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of both ypN and LNR in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in a tertiary care center during the period 2000-2014. We stratified the population based on LNR (≤0.20, 0.20-0.65, and >0.65) and ypN (N1, N2, and N3) status. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank + test. We further compared patient mortality and disease recurrence using multivariate Cox regression analysis. We evaluated 169 patients with a median follow-up of 87 months. At 2 years of follow-up, patients with low-risk LNR compared to those with moderate and high risk had a higher PFS (54% vs 31% vs 18%, respectively; P < .001) and OS (74% vs 64% vs 45%, respectively; P < .001). Moreover, ypN1 patients compared to ypN2 and ypN3 showed similar results in PFS (53% vs 35% vs 19%, respectively; P = .001) and OS (73% vs 69% vs 43%, respectively; P < .001). Compared to the low-risk population, patients with moderate (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-8.71) and high risk (HR: 6.90; 95% CI: 2.29-20.77) had a worse PFS. Regarding OS, moderate-risk (HR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.10-7.38) and high-risk patients (HR: 6.48; 95% CI: 2.13-19.76) showed considerably worse outcomes. On the other hand, ypN staging was not associated with PFS or OS in the multivariate analysis. The LNR is a better prognostic factor of survival than ypN. The LNR should be considered in the stratification of risk after NAC in patients with TNBC.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients with Adequate Pathologic Evidence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND The prognostic role of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer has not been illuminated. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic role of LNR in breast cancer compared with traditional ypN stage. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 306 breast cancer patients diagnosed with positive axillary lymph nodes from January 2007 to December 2014 were eligible for this retrospective analysis. All enrolled patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles of NAC followed by mastectomy and level I, II, and III axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 78 months (range, 7-147 months). Univariate analysis indicated that both the LNR category (P<0.001) and ypN stage (P<0.001) were significant associated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). However, multivariate analysis indicated that the LNR category was independently associated with EFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001), while the ypN stage showed no statistical effect on EFS (P=0.391) or OS (P=0.081). On additional analyses stratified by molecular subtypes, we found that the prognosis of triple negative breast cancer could be better discriminated when the cutoff value of LNR was set at 0.15. CONCLUSIONS LNR showed a superior predictive value in evaluating prognosis of breast cancer patients after NAC. In addition, the LNR cutoff point 0.15 can accurately discriminate survival outcomes for different triple negative breast cancer subtypes.

Lymph Node Ratio (LNR): Predicting Prognosis after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in Breast Cancer Patients

Objective

Axillary lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC). Residual nodal disease burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is one of the important prognostic factors to determine the prognosis and in the treatment of BC. Lymph node ratio (LNR) defined as the ratio of the number of positive lymph nodes to total excised axillary lymph nodes, may be a stronger determinant of prognosis than pN in axillary nodal staging, although there is very limited data evaluating its prognostic value in the setting of NAC. In this cohort of patients, we studied the utility of LNR in predicting recurrence and overall survival (OS) after NAC.

Materials and Methods

An Institutional cancer registry was queried from 2009 to 2014 for women with axillary node-positive BC with no evidence of distant metastasis, and who received NAC followed by surgery for loco-regional treatment (axillary dissection with breast conserving surgery or total mastectomy). Patients with axillary complete response were excluded. Locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence (DR) and overall survival (OS) rates were reviewed regarding pN and LNR.

Results

A total of 179 patients were analyzed. Median follow up time was 24 [25%, 75%: 13-42] months. Patients with pN1 in comparison to pN2 and pN3 had lower rate of LRR (9% vs. 15% and 14%, respectively; p=0.41), lower rate of DR (14% vs. 25% and 27%, respectively, p=0.16) and increased rate of OS (89% vs. 79% and 78%, respectively, p=0.04). In comparison to patients with LNR >20%, patients with LNR ≤20% had lower LRR (9% vs. 14%, p=0.25), lower DR (13% vs. 27%, p=0.01) and improved OS (89% vs. 79%, p=0.02) rates. In the pN1 group, patients who had a LNR >20% had higher DR (22% vs. 14%, p=0.48) rates in comparison to patients with LNR ≤20%. In ER/PR (+) patients who had LNR ≤20% DR was 6% compared with 23% in patient who had LNR >20% (p=0.02), and in triple negative patients' OS rate was significantly better compared the LNR less/equal or more than 20% (71% vs 33%, p=0.001).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that LNR adds valuable information for the prognosis after NAC and this additional information should be considered when deciding further treatment and follow-up for patients who had residual tumor burden on the axilla. This observation should be tested in a larger study.

Impact of Number of Positive Lymph Nodes and Lymph Node Ratio on Survival of Women with Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the association of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) and number of positive lymph nodes (pN) with the risk of breast cancer recurrence and death.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of node-positive stage II and III breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated between 2008 and 2009 at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Brazil. Overall and disease-free survival curves for number of positive lymph nodes (pN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) risk groups were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise forward Cox regression models.

Results

In total, 628 women with node-positive breast cancer were included. Most patients (69.5%) had advanced clinical stage tumors (≥IIB). The median follow-up was 58 months (range: 3-92 months). The adjusted recurrence hazard of pN2 and pN3 patients was 2.47 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.72-3.56) and 2.42 (1.62-3.60), respectively, compared to pN1 patients (p<0.001), while the hazard of intermediate (0.21-0.65) and high-risk (>0.65) LNR was 2.11 (1.49-3.00) and 3.19 (2.12-4.80), respectively, compared to low-risk LNR (≤0.20) patients (p<0.001). On the other hand, the hazard of death of pN2 and pN3 patients was 2.17 (1.42-3.30) and 2.41 (1.53-3.78), respectively (p<0.001), and the hazard of intermediate (0.21-0.65) and high-risk (>0.65) LNR patients was 1.70 (1.13-2.56) and 2.74 (1.75-4.28), respectively (p≤0.001).

Conclusion

Higher pN and LNR were associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival times.

Development and validation of a nomogram incorporating axillary lymph node ratio to predict survival in node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Objective

Over the past decade, several studies have highlighted that axillary lymph node ratio (ratio of involved over excised axillary lymph nodes) was a superior predictor for survival outcomes compared with ypN staging. Thus, this study aimed to integrate the prognostic value of axillary lymph node ratio to improve individualized prediction of survival in node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A clinical data of 339 node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from two independent centers were retrospectively reviewed. A nomogram incorporating axillary lymph node ratio was constructed to predict disease-free survival based on Cox proportional hazards model. The discrimination, calibration ability, and clinical usefulness of the axillary lymph node ratio-based model were evaluated using C-index, calibration curve, risk group stratification and decision curve analysis and were compared with the TNM staging system.

Results

Independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival were age, pathological T stage, axillary lymph node ratio, histological grade, estrogen receptor status, Ki67 and lymphovascular invasion, which were entered into the nomogram. The C-index of the axillary lymph node ratio-based nomogram was higher than that of the TNM staging system (0.773 vs 0.610). The calibration plot indicated close agreement between model predictions and actual observations. Based on the risk group stratification of the nomogram, Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant differences between the low-risk and high-risk groups (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The axillary lymph node ratio-based nomogram provided more accurate individualized risk prediction of disease-free survival in node-positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This practical tool may assist oncologists in selecting the high-risk patients who are in need of a specific treatment strategy.

Risk factors of locoregional relapse in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy following mastectomy and radiotherapy

We seek to investigate the prognostic factors that could possibly increase the locoregional recurrence of breast cancer patients who do not achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and to build a prognostic nomogram to predict patients' outcome. The retrospective analysis included 510 patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and radiotherapy. 62 locoregional events occurred after a median 61 months of follow-up. The five-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence and regional recurrence were 8.63% and 4.31%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that positivity for ≥ 4 lymph nodes and Ki-67 index ≥ 14% were independent factors. According to our prognostic model, the 5-year locoregional free survival rates in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were 95.5%, 89.1%, and 67.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Annual recurrence curves indicated that the relapse peak after mastectomy emerged in the first 1 year. Positivity for ≥ 4 lymph nodes and Ki-67 index ≥ 14% were independent factors for locoregional recurrence. This prognostic model has considerable clinical value in predicting locoregional recurrence, which could help clinicians to design appropriate locoregional treatment specifically and to perform surveillance individually.

Lymph node ratio as an alternative to pN staging for predicting prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Axillary nodal status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer. The lymph node ratio (LNR) has been suggested as an independent prognostic factor because the number of dissected and involved lymph nodes might differ across institutions. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been the preferred treatment method for reducing tumor mass in the breast and axillary area. However, NAC can reduce total number of excised lymph nodes compared with upfront surgery. Therefore, an emerging question is whether axillary nodal status and LNR following NAC can accurately predict prognosis. We evaluated the prognostic value of axillary nodal status and LNR after NAC. A total of 236 patients were enrolled. Patients were divided into four groups according to the following cut-off values for LNR: 0 (n = 107), 0.01-0.20 (n = 68), 0.21-0.65 (n = 50) and >0.65 (n = 11). Pathologic complete responses were observed in 16.9% of the overall cohort. In univariate analysis, pathologic N stage was a significant prognostic factor of disease free survival (DFS, p = 0.013) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.004). However, in multivariate analysis, hormone receptor status (p = 0.043) and LNR (p = 0.028) were significantly associated with DFS and LNR (p = 0.017) showed statistical significance for OS; however, pathologic N stage was no longer significantly associated with DFS or OS. Traditional nodal staging has been accepted as an important prognostic factor; however, our result indicated that the nodal ratio could be an alternative to pN staging as a prognostic factor after NAC in breast cancer.

Secondary node analysis as an indicator for axillary lymphadenectomy in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is no agreement regarding if it would be necessary to perform an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients who have macrometastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). We studied the utility of the secondary node analysis (SN), defined as the following node after the SLN in an anatomical and lymphatic pathway, as a sign of malignant axillary involvement.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective and multicentre study was designed to assess the utility of the SN as a sign of axillary involvement. Among 2273 patients with breast cancer, a valid sample of 283 was obtained representing those who had the SN studied. Main endpoints of our study were: the SLN, the SN and the ALND histological pattern. Sensitivity, specificity and precision of the test were also calculated.

RESULTS

SN test, in cases with positive SLN, has a sensitivity of 61.1%, a specificity of 78.7%, a positive predictive value of 45.8% and a negative predictive value of 87.3% with a precision of 74.7%.

CONCLUSION

The study of the SN together with the technique of the SLN allows a more precise staging of the axillary involvement, in patients with breast cancer, than just the SLN technique.

Less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: an indicator of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

The number of lymph node retrieved in the surgical specimen is important for tumor staging and has paramount impact on prognosis in colorectal cancer and imitates the adequacy of lymph node surgical clearance. The paucity of lymph node yields in patients undergoing resection after preoperative chemo radiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer has seen. Lower total number of lymph nodes in the total mesoractal excision (TME) specimen after CRT, could a marker of better tumor response.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively managed data of patients underwent excision for rectal cancer, who treated by neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. From 2010 to 2014, 364 patients underwent rectal cancer surgery, of which ninety-one treated with neoadjuvant treatment. Standard surgical and pathological protocols were followed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the number of total harvested lymph nodes with group 1, having 12 or more nodes harvested, and group 2 including patients who had <12 lymph nodes harvested. The total number of lymph nodes retrieved from the surgical specimen was correlated with grade of tumor regression with neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 91 patients, 38 patients (42%) had less than 12 lymph nodes examined in specimen. The difference in median number of lymph nodes was observed significantly as 9 (range, 2-11) versus 16 (range, 12-32), in group 2 and 1, respectively (P<0.01). Patients with fewer lymph node group were comparable with respect to age, BMI, pre-operative staging, neoadjuvant treatment. Pathological complete response in tumor pCR was seen with significantly higher rate (40% vs. 26%, P<0.05) in group 2. As per Mandard criteria, there was significant difference in tumor regression grade (TRG) between both the groups (P<0.05). Among patients with metastatic lymph nodes, median LNR was lower in <12 lymph nodes group at 0.167 (range, 0.09-0.45) versus 0.187 (range, 0.05-0.54), difference was not statistically significant (P=0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Retrieval of fewer than 12 lymph nodes in surgical specimen of rectal cancer who had received neo-adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy should be considered as a good indicator of tumor response with better local disease control, and a good prognostic factor, rather than as a pointer of poor diligence of the surgical and pathological assessment.

Lymph Node Ratio Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Prognostic in Hormone Receptor-Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratios (LNR), the proportion of positive lymph nodes over the number excised, both defined as ranges and single ratio values are prognostic of outcome. Little is known of the prognostic value of LNR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) according to molecular subtype.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2014, patients who underwent definitive surgery after NAC were identified. LNR was calculated for node-positive patients who received axillary dissection or had at least 6 nodes removed. DFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier log rank test for yp N0-3 status, LNR categories (LNRC) ≤0.20 (low), 0.21-0.65 (intermediate), >0.65 (high), and single LNR values.

RESULTS

Of 428 NAC recipients, 263 were node negative and 165 (38.6 %) node positive: ypN1 = 97 (58.8 %), ypN2 = 43 (26.1 %), and ypN3 = 25 (15.2 %). Among node-positive cancers, the median number of LN removed was 14 (range, 6-51) and the median LNR was 0.22 (range, 0.03-1.0). Nodal stage was inversely associated with 5-year DFS: 91.5 % (ypN0), 74.5 % (ypN1), 49.8 % (ypN2), and 50.7 % (ypN3) (p < 0.001). LNRC was similarly inversely associated with DFS: 69.1 % (low), 71.4 % (intermediate), 49.3 % (high) (p < 0.001). Significant associations between LNRC and DFS were demonstrated in hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes, p = 0.02 and p = 0.003. A single-value LNR ≤ 0.15 in node-positive, HR-positive (94.1 vs 67.7 %; p = 0.04) and TNBC (94.1 vs 47.8 %; p = 0.001) groups was also significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual nodal disease after NAC, analyzed by LNRC or LNR = 0.15 cutoff value, is prognostic and can discriminate between favorable and unfavorable outcomes for HR-positive and TNBC cancers.

Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Oncologic Outcomes in ypStage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy followed by Total Mesorectal Excision, and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in ypStage III rectal cancer patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 638 consecutive patients who underwent NCRT followed by total mesorectal excision, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer from 2004 to 2011. Of these, 125 patients were positive for lymph node (LN) metastasis and were analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

The median numbers of examined and metastatic LNs were 17 and 2, respectively, and the median LNR was 0.143 (range, 0.02-1). Median follow-up time was 55 months. In multivariate analyses, LNR was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, p = 0.041), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.28, p = 0.005), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR 2.30, p = 0.010). When ypN1 patients were divided into low (low LNR ypN1 group) and high LNR (high LNR ypN1 group) according to a cut-off value of 0.152, the high LNR ypN1 group had poorer OS (p = 0.043) and DFS (p = 0.056) compared with the low LNR ypN1 group. And there were no differences between the high LNR ypN1 group and the ypN2 group in terms of the OS (p = 0.703) and DFS (p = 0.831).

CONCLUSIONS

For ypN-positive rectal cancer patients, the LNR was a more effective prognostic marker than the ypN stage, circumferential resection margin, or tumor regression grade after NCRT, and could be used to discern the high-risk group among ypN1 patients.