Which is the best antiaggregant or anticoagulant therapy after TAVI? A propensity-matched analysis from the ITER registry. The management of DAPT after TAVI

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Surgical Risk Patients: An Updated Metanalysis of Extended Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Trials

The long-term safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in low surgical risk has not been evaluated in a pooled analysis. An electronic database search was conducted for randomized controlled trials with a maximal 5 years clinical and echocardiographic follow-up including low surgical risk patients who underwent TAVR or SAVR. We calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Subgroups analysis was performed for permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leaks. Three randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 2,611 low surgical risk patients (Society of Thoracic Surgeons score <4%). Compared with SAVR, the TAVR group had similar rates of all-cause mortality (OR 0.94,95% CI 0.65 to 1.37, p = 0.75) and disabling stroke (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.36, p = 0.48). No significant differences were registered in the TAVR group in terms of major cardiovascular events (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.38, p = 0.83), myocardial infarction (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.40, p = 0.31), valve thrombosis (OR 3.11, 95% CI 0.29 to 33.47, p = 0.35), endocarditis (OR 0.71,95% CI 0.35 to 1.48, p = 0.36), aortic valve reintervention (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.66, p = 0.80), and rehospitalization (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.02, p = 0.07) compared with SAVR. However, TAVR patients had a higher risk of paravalvular leaks (OR 8.21, 95% CI 4.18 to 16.14, p <0.00001), but lower rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (OR 0.27,95% CI 0.17 to 0.30, p <0.0001). The rates of permanent pacemaker implantation were comparable from 1 year up to a maximum of 5 years (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.97, p = 0.18). Lastly, TAVR had a greater effective orifice area (0.10 cm2/m2, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.15, p = 0.0001), but similar transvalvular mean gradients (0.60, 95% CI 3.94 to 2.73, p = 0.72). In conclusion, TAVR patients had similar long-term outcomes compared with SAVR, except for an elevated risk of paravalvular leaks in the TAVR group and increased rates of atrial fibrillation in the SAVR cohort.

Bleeding and thrombotic risk of different antiplatelet regimens posttranscatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation: Results from an all-comers national registry

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based recommendations for antithrombotic treatment in patients who have an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER) are lacking.

AIMS

To compare bleeding and thrombotic risk for different antithrombotic regimens post-TEER with MitraClip in an unselected population with the need for OACs.

METHODS

Bleeding and thrombotic complications (stroke and myocardial infarction) up to 3 months after TEER with mitraclip were evaluated in 322 consecutive pts with an indication for OACs. These endpoints were defined by the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria and were compared between two antithrombotic regimens: single antithrombotic therapy with OAC (single ATT) and double/triple ATT with a combination of OAC and aspirin and/or clopidogrel (combined ATT).

RESULTS

Collectively, 108 (34%) patients received single ATT, 203 (63%) received double ATT and 11 (3%) received triple ATT. Bleeding events occurred in 67 patients (20.9%), with access site related events being the most frequent cause (37%). Bleeding complications were observed more frequently in the combined ATT group than in the single ATT group: 24% versus 14% [p = 0.03, adjusted RR: 0.55 (0.3-0.98)]. Within the combined group, the bleeding risk was 23% in the double ATT and 45% in the triple ATT group. Thrombotic complications occurred in only three patients (0.9%), and all belonged to the combined ATT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an indication for OACs, withholding of antiplatelet therapy post-TEER with Mitraclip was associated with a 45% reduction in bleeding and without a signal of increased thrombotic risk.

Optimal antiplatelet and antithrombotic regimen post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding optimal antiplatelet/antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

In this single-centre retrospective study including TAVR patients from 2012 to 2020, ischemic and bleeding outcomes were compared between antiplatelet (dual antiplatelet [DAPT] vs. single antiplatelet [SAPT]) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) groups using incidence rate, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Total 492 patients (mean age 79.7 ± 7.7 years, 53.7% males, 83.5% Caucasian) were included. There was higher incidence of 1-year death or ischemia with DAPT vs. SAPT (23.6 vs. 14.8 per 100 patient-years [PY], incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-2.68, p = .05), especially in those without coronary artery disease (23.9 vs. 10.7 per 100 PY, IRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.10-4.47, p = .017). There was significantly higher major bleeding in those on OAC vs. no OAC (15 vs. 8 per 100 PY, IRR 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.11, p = .016), especially late (>1-year) bleeding (10.2 vs. 3.6 per 100 PY, IRR 2.81, 95% CI 1.33-5.92, p = .004). In multivariate analysis, DAPT was an independent predictor of death or ischemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.01-1.96, p = .041). OAC was an independent predictor of major bleeding (aHR 2.32, 95% CI 1.31-4.13, p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

There is signal to harm with routine use of DAPT post-TAVR. There is higher incidence of late bleeding post-TAVR with OAC, suggesting potential role for alternate antithrombotic strategies.

Early 6 months usage of single anTiplAtelet OR anTicoAgulant followed by single antiplatelet after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The strategy for initiating antithrombotic therapy to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain. There is still lacking evidence on the efficacy and safety of early 6 months usage of single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulant (OAC) after TAVR in patients without anticoagulant indications.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label trial, and 650 patients undergoing TAVR from 13 top TAVR centres in China will be recruited. Each eligible participant will be randomly assigned to two groups (1:1 ratio) as (1) SAPT (aspirin 75-100 mg for 6 months) group or (2) OAC group (warfarin, therapeutic international normalised ratio at 1.8-2.5 for 6 months), both followed by sequential aspirin 75-100 mg for 6 months. Participants in both groups will be invited for three follow-up visits of 1, 6 and 12 months after discharge. We will use both the net clinical benefit endpoint (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attacks, peripheral artery thrombosis, intracardiac thrombosis and major bleeding and disabling or life-threatening bleeding) and the BPVT endpoint evaluated by four-dimensional CT as our primary endpoints. P value of <0.05 of two-sided test will be considered statistically significant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases of China (Approval No. 2023-1947). All patients will be informed of the details of the study and will sign an informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05375474.

Impact of periprocedural bleeding on mid-term outcome in nonagenarians who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from LAPLACE registry

Data from several recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) even in nonagenarians. However, the impact of periprocedural bleeding following TAVI on their outcome remains unclear. In the aLliAnce for exPloring cLinical prospects of AortiC valvE disease (LAPLACE) registry, we compared outcomes between the bleeding and no-bleeding groups among 1953 patients < 90 years old (mean age, 83.0 ± 4.6 years old) and 316 nonagenarians (mean age, 91.7 ± 1.9 years old) who underwent TAVI with a median follow-up period of 628 days. The group with any periprocedural bleeding showed a higher 30-day mortality than the no-bleeding group in patients < 90 years old (3.3% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.001) and nonagenarians (7.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.001). In patients < 90 years old, severe periprocedural bleeding (n = 85) was associated with a higher mid-term all-cause mortality rate than no severe bleeding (n = 1,868), even after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio [HR], 1.994; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.287-2.937; p = 0.002). On the other hand, in nonagenarians, any periprocedural bleeding (n = 38) was associated with a higher mid-term cardiovascular (CV) mortality rate (21.1% vs. 4.3%, log-rank p = 0.014) than no bleeding (n = 278), even after adjusting for covariates (HR, 3.104; 95% CI 1.140-8.449; p = 0.027). In conclusion, any periprocedural bleeding after TAVI was associated with mid-term CV mortality in nonagenarians, whereas severe bleeding was associated with mid-term all-cause mortality in patients < 90 years old.

The search for optimal antithrombotic therapy in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: facts and uncertainties

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a minimally invasive procedure, which is used frequently in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis. Most patients undergoing TAVI are over 80 years of age with a high bleeding as well as thrombotic risk. Despite the increasing safety of the procedure, thromboembolic events [stroke, (subclinical) valve thrombosis] remain prevalent. As a consequence, antithrombotic prophylaxis is routinely used and only recently new data on the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic drugs has become available. On the other hand, these antithrombotic drugs increase bleeding in a population with unique aortic stenosis-related bleeding characteristics (such as acquired von Willebrand factor defect and angiodysplasia). In this review, we discuss the impact of thromboembolic and bleeding events, the current optimal antithrombotic therapy based on registries and recent randomized controlled trials, as well as try to give a practical guide how to treat these high-risk patients. Finally, we discuss knowledge gaps and future research needed to fill these gaps.

Bayesian Meta-analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Vitamin K Antagonists With or Without Concomitant Antiplatelet After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Anticoagulation Indication

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) commonly have co-morbidities requiring anticoagulation. However, the optimal post-procedural anticoagulation regimen is not well-established. This meta-analysis investigates safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA), with or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy. We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for appropriate studies. Subgroup analyses were performed for anticoagulant monotherapy and combined therapy with antiplatelet agents. Eleven studies (6359 patients) were included. Overall, there were no differences between DOACs and VKA for all-cause mortality (Odds Ratio [OR]: .69; Credible Interval [CrI]: .40–1.06), cardiovascular-related mortality (OR: .76; Crl: .13–3.47), bleeding (OR: .95; CrI: .75–1.17), stroke (OR: 1.04; CrI: .65–1.63), myocardial infarction (OR: 1.51; CrI: .55–3.84), and valve thrombosis (OR: .29; CrI: .01–3.54). For DOACs vs VKA monotherapy subgroup, there were no differences in outcomes. For the combined therapy subgroup, there was decreased odds of all-cause mortality in the DOACs group compared with the VKA group (OR: .13; CrI: .02–.65), but no differences for bleeding and stroke. DOACs and VKA have similar safety and efficacy profiles for post-TAVI patients with anticoagulation indication. However, if concomitant antiplatelet therapy is required, DOACs were more favorable than VKA for all-cause mortality.

Evolving concepts in the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Thromboembolic and bleeding complications negatively impact recovery and survival after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Particularly, there is a considerable risk of ischaemic stroke and vascular access related bleeding, as well as spontaneous gastro-intestinal bleeding. Therefore, benefit and harm of antithrombotic therapy should be carefully balanced. This review summarizes current evidence on peri- and post-procedural antithrombotic treatment. Indeed, in recent years, the management of antithrombotic therapy after TAVI has evolved from intensive, expert opinion-based strategies, towards a deescalated, evidence-based approach. Besides per procedural administration of unfractionated heparin, this encompasses single antiplatelet therapy in patients without a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC); and OAC monotherapy in patients with such indication, mainly being atrial fibrillation. Combination therapy should generally be avoided to reduce bleeding risk, except after recent coronary stenting where a period of dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus P2Y12-inhibitor) or P2Y12-inhibitor plus OAC (in patients with an independent indication for OAC) is recommended to prevent stent thrombosis. This new paradigm in which reduced antithrombotic intensity leads to improved patient safety, without a loss of efficacy, may be particularly suitable for elderly and fragile patients. Whether this holds in upcoming populations of younger and lower-risk patients and in specific populations as patients with subclinical valve thrombosis, is yet to be proven. Finally, whether less intensive or alternative approaches should be also applied for the periprocedural management of the antithrombotic therapy, has to be determined by ongoing and future studies.

Prognosis of patients with active cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An insight from Japanese multicenter registry

Background

Malignancy is common in older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and may affect prognosis. The present study aimed to examine whether active cancer affects all-cause mortality rates among patients undergoing TAVI.

Methods

This retrospective study examined data from 1,114 consecutive patients treated between April 2010 and June 2019. Patients with life expectancy of <1 year due to non-cardiac causes were excluded.

Results

Active cancer was defined as cancer under treatment or cured within 1 year, and was recognized in 62 patients (5.6%) with (n = 17) and without (n = 45) metastases. In multivariate analysis, being female (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–0.77, p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (HR = 0.92 per 1 kg/m² increase, 95% CI 0.87–0.97, p = 0.001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV (HR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.06–2.20, p = 0.022), atrial fibrillation (HR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.70–3.38, p < 0.001), albumin levels (HR = 0.41 per 1-g/dl, 95% CI 0.30–0.57, p < 0.001), and cancer metastasis (HR = 5.28, 95% CI 1.86–14.9, p = 0.001) were associated with all-cause mortality after TAVI.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing TAVI, being female, high BMI, NYHA class III/IV, atrial fibrillation, albumin levels, and cancer metastasis were factors associated with mortality. Meanwhile, active cancer without metastasis was not associated with increased mortality rates. These findings would help clinical decision-making by patients and physicians.

Clinical trial registration: UMIN000031133.

Comparing Single- and Dual Antiplatelet Therapies Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been an established treatment in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. However, the postoperative antiplatelet regimen after transcatheter aortic valve implantation was not established certainly. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of single- (SAPT) and dual-antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

Eligible randomized controlled trials and cohort studies published before February 2021 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Nine articles, involving 19,277 patients, met the selection criteria. In the short-term outcome, compared with SAPT, DAPT was associated with a significantly higher rate of bleeding (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 3.00, 1.67-5.38) and showed no significant differences in thrombotic events (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 1.25, 0.74-2.11) and all-cause mortality (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 0.84; 0.42-1.69). In the long-term outcome, DAPT was associated with a significantly higher bleeding rate (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 1.85, 1.24-2.78) and showed no differences in thrombotic events (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 1.13, 0.86-1.48) and all-cause mortality (odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 1.12, 0.95-1.32). Our trial sequential analysis confirmed DAPT didn't confer any benefit for reducing all-cause mortality and thrombotic events, and carried a higher risk of bleeding than SAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

SAPT should be a sufficient antiplatelet strategy in post- transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients without indications for oral anticoagulation medication, especially in the long-term follow-up period.

Effects of single versus dual antiplatelet therapy on the adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was currently recommended for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) postoperative management in clinical application. However, POPular-TAVI trial showed DAPT increased the incidence of adverse events compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of SAPT versus DAPT on the adverse events after TAVI. Eleven studies were available from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to April 1, 2021. The pooled effect size was presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The sensitivity analysis was used to assess the stability of analysis results, and Begg's test was applied to evaluate the publication bias. The Cochran Q test and the I² statistic were used to evaluate the heterogeneity, and the source of heterogeneity was explored by meta-regression. A total of 4804 patients were obtained, with 2257 in SAPT group and 2547 in DAPT group. Compared to the DAPT, SAPT was associated with the decreased risk of all-cause bleeding (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.44-0.61), major bleeding (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.86), and minor bleeding (RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.98). There were no significant differences in mortality and myocardial infarction events, stroke events, and acute kidney injury between the two groups. SAPT was superior to DAPT in decreasing all-cause bleeding, major bleeding, and minor bleeding, suggesting that SAPT could be preferentially recommended for TAVI postoperative management in most patients without another indication for DAPT and oral anticoagulation.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Single Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Although mainstream guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is not evidence-based. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of DAPT vs. single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after TAVR, and review updated evidence. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing DAPT to SAPT after TAVR from inception to November 30, 2020. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major or life-threatening bleeding (LTB). Subgroup analysis was performed according to study type (randomized control trials vs. observational studies) using a fixed-effects model. The quality of evidence was assessed by two scoring systems and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Results: Twelve studies of 20,766 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with SAPT, DAPT was associated with an increased risk for combined life threatening and major bleeding [OR 1.73 (1.19-2.51), p = 0.004] after TAVR. Such a difference was largely driven by major bleeding [OR 2.29 (1.68-3.11), p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [OR 1.19 (0.99-1.44), p = 0.07], cardiovascular mortality [OR 1.46 (0.93-2.30), p = 0.10], and stroke [OR 0.97 (0.80-1.16), p = 0.71]. Conclusions: Compared with SAPT, post-TAVR DAPT was associated with increased risks of major or life-threatening bleeding without additional benefits of reducing thrombotic events. Future guidelines for post-TAVR antiplatelet strategy are expected to be updated as new high-quality evidence emerges. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, Identifier: CRD42021230075.

Antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare antithrombotic regimens after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients without an indication for long-term anticoagulation. TAVI is a safe and effective approach for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and an intermediate-to-high surgical risk. Nevertheless, the antithrombotic regimen after procedure remains controversial.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for interventional studies comparing single antiplatelet therapy with double antiplatelet therapy after TAVI. A meta-analysis was carried out to compare thrombotic and bleeding events between both strategies.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials were included comprising a total of 1085 patients. Our meta-analysis revealed a higher odds ratio (OR) of major bleeding events (pooled OR 2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-4.67; P < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and minor bleeding (pooled OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.12-2.66; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%) for the double antiplatelet therapy group compared with the single antiplatelet therapy group. There was no difference between groups in the risk of stroke (pooled OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.58-1.86; P = 0.91; I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (pooled OR 2.10, 95% CI 0.75-5.84; P = 0.16, I2 = 0%) and all-cause mortality (pooled OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.63-1.86; P = 0.08; I2 = 0%) after TAVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pooled analysis suggests that for patients who underwent TAVI, double antiplatelet therapy compared with single antiplatelet therapy alone increased the risk of bleeding without reducing mortality and ischaemic events.

Usefulness of Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

The rationale for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is to facilitate endothelialization of metallic struts of the transcatheter heart valve and to prevent thrombosis that could lead to thromboembolic events. Based on expert consensus, current societal guidelines recommend DAPT for 1 to 6 months after TAVI with weak evidence. Although the pivotal TAVI trials mandated this regimen, the evidence for the efficacy of DAPT to prevent transcatheter heart valve thrombosis is limited to 3 small trials and a handful of observational studies. Multiple coronary trials have demonstrated that DAPT is associated with increased bleeding in comparison with single antiplatelet therapy, especially in elderly patients. TAVI patients are predominantly elderly and frequently have risk factors that predispose them to bleeding. Herein, we summarize the evidence for antiplatelet therapy after TAVI and explore the theoretical benefit of DAPT to prevent thromboembolic events versus the risk of increased bleeding.

Safety and Efficacy of Different Antithrombotic Strategies after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

 The optimal pharmacological therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain. We compared efficacy and safety of various antiplatelet and anticoagulant approaches after TAVI by a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

 A total of 14 studies (both observational and randomized) were considered, with 24,119 patients included. Primary safety endpoint was the incidence of any bleeding complications during follow-up. Secondary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Efficacy endpoints were stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effects model. The following strategies were compared: dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), oral anticoagulation (OAC), and OAC + SAPT. The mean follow-up was 15 months.

RESULTS

 In comparison to DAPT, SAPT was associated with a 44% risk reduction of any bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.39-0.80]). SAPT was ranked as the safest strategy for the prevention of any bleeding (p-score: 0.704), followed by OAC alone (p-score: 0.476) and DAPT (p-score: 0.437). Consistent results were observed for major bleeding. The incidence of cardiovascular death and secondary ischemic endpoints did not differ among the tested antithrombotic approaches. In patients with indication for long-term anticoagulation, OAC alone showed similar rates of stroke (OR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.41-2.05], p = 0.83) and reduced occurrence of any bleeding (OR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.37-0.66], p < 0.01) versus OAC + SAPT.

CONCLUSION

 The present network meta-analysis supports after TAVI the use of SAPT in patients without indication for OAC and OAC alone in those needing long-term anticoagulation.

Aspirin Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

Background In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation without an indication for oral anticoagulation, it is unclear whether single or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize both the bleeding and thromboembolic risk. In this patient-level meta-analysis, we further investigate the effect of aspirin alone compared with DAPT for preventing both thromboembolic and bleeding events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic review of all available randomized controlled trials comparing aspirin with DAPT. In total, 1086 patients were included across 4 eligible trials. The primary outcomes were the composite of all-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, stroke or myocardial infarction (first composite outcome), and the same composite excluding bleeding (second composite outcome), both tested at 30 days and 3 months. The first composite outcome occurred significantly less in the aspirin-alone group at 30 days (10.3% versus 14.7%, odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.97, P=0.034) and 3 months (11.0% versus 16.5%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94, P=0.02), compared with the DAPT group. The second composite outcome occurred in 5.5% and 6.6% at 30 days (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.50-1.38, P=0.47) and in 6.9% and 8.5% at 3 months in the aspirin-alone group compared with the DAPT group (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52-1.29, P=0.39), respectively. Conclusions In patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, aspirin alone significantly reduced the composite of thromboembolic and bleeding events, and does not increase the composite of thromboembolic events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, compared with DAPT.

Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Although current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 to 6 months following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there are no studies directly comparing outcomes of different durations of DAPT following TAVR.

Methods and Results

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database were searched through November 2020 to identify clinical studies that investigated single antiplatelet therapy versus DAPT use following TAVR. Studies using oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy concomitantly were excluded. The DAPT group was subdivided by the duration of DAPT. We extracted the risk ratios (RRs) of major or life‐threatening bleeding, stroke, and all‐cause mortality. Four randomized controlled trials, 2 propensity‐score matched studies, and 1 observational study were identified, yielding a total of 2498 patients who underwent TAVR assigned to the single antiplatelet therapy group (n=1249), 3‐month DAPT group (n=485), or 6‐month DAPT group (n=764). Pooled analyses demonstrated that when compared with the single antiplatelet therapy group, the rates of major or life‐threatening bleeding were significantly higher in the 3‐ and 6‐month DAPT groups (RR [95% CI]=2.13 [1.33–3.40], P=0.016; RR [95% CI]=2.54 [1.49–4.33], P=0.007, respectively) with no difference between the 3‐month DAPT versus 6‐month DAPT groups. The rates of stroke and all‐cause mortality were similar among the 3 groups.

Conclusions

In this network meta‐analysis of antiplatelet therapy following TAVR, single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin had lower bleeding without increasing stroke or death when compared with either 3‐ or 6‐month DAPT.

Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Single vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Patients

The relative safety and efficacy of aspirin versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin+clopidogrel) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and did not have a long-term indication for oral anticoagulation remains controversial. Digital databases were searched to identify relevant articles. The major safety end point was bleeding, while the efficacy end points included after-TAVI ischemic and thrombotic events. Data were analyzed using a random effect model to calculate the pooled unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes. Eleven studies comprising 4805 patients (aspirin 2258, DAPT 2547) were included in the quantitative analysis. Patients receiving aspirin-alone had significantly lower odds of all cause bleeding (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29 to .057, p <0.00001), major vascular bleeding (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.77, p = 0.001), Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) major bleeding (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.83 p = 0.008), VARC-2 minor bleeding (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97, p = 0.04), transfusion requirement (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.0.98, p = 0.05) and major vascular complications (OR0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.66, p = 0.0002) compared with after-TAVI patients receiving both aspirin and clopidogrel. These was no significant difference in the odds of VARC-2 life threatening bleeding (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.07, p = 0.08), prosthetic valve thrombosis (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.22 to 6.30, p = 0.85), cardiac tamponade (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.98, p = 0.70), conversion to open procedure (OR 1.99, 95 % CI 0.42 to 9.44, p = 0.39), MI (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.38 to 1.64, p = 0.52), transient ischemic attack (TIA) (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.12 to 6.44, p = 0.91), major stroke (OR 0.68 95 % CI 0.43 to 1.08, p = 0.10), disabling stroke (0R 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.48, p = 0.99), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.81 95% CI 0.38 to 1.74, p = 0.59) and all-cause mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.16, p = 0.31) between the 2 groups. In conclusion, after-TAVI patients who received aspirin alone had lower bleeding events with no significant differences in mortality and stroke rate compared with those who received DAPT.

Aspirin Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The current American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel for 6 months followed by lifelong aspirin after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, studies that have DAPT with aspirin following TAVR have questioned this recommendation as DAPT has been associated with more bleeding events compared to aspirin. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all the RCTs comparing DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) with aspirin alone as antithrombotic treatment following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

The databases of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane library were searched from inception to Oct 1, 2020, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting aspirin plus clopidogrel with aspirin alone as antithrombotic treatment after TAVI were included. Revman 5.3 was used to conduct the analysis.

RESULTS

After screening 152 articles, four studies involving 1086 patients (541 patients in the aspirin group and 545 patients in the DAPT group) were included. The results demonstrated that, at 30 days follow-up, compared with DAPT, aspirin was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the rate of bleeding events (RR = 1.22, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.39, P = 0.57), all-cause mortality (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.84, P = 0.66), stroke (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.79, P = 0.74), and MI (RR = 4.00, 95% CI 0.45 to 35.22, P = 0.21). However, at the 6 to 12 months follow-up, DAPT appeared to increase the risk of bleeding events compared with aspirin alone (RR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.24, P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in the rate of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.48, P = 0.65), stroke (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.92, P = 0.90), and MI (RR = 1.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 5.26, P = 0.40) among the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that aspirin alone could decrease the risk of bleeding and was not associated with higher risk of mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction compared with DAPT.

Adjunctive Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Importance

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established alternative to surgery for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Adjunctive antithrombotic therapy used to mitigate thrombotic risks in patients undergoing TAVR must be balanced against bleeding complications, since both are associated with increased mortality.

Observation

Stroke risk associated with TAVR is lower than that associated with surgical aortic valve replacement in recent trials including patients at intermediate or low risk, but it is constant beginning at the time of implant and accrues over time based on patient risk factors. Patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR also have a sizable risk of life-threatening or major bleeding. Although dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 to 6 months after TAVR is the guideline-recommended regimen, this practice is not well supported by current evidence. In patients with no indication for oral anticoagulation, current registry-based evidence suggests that single antiplatelet therapy may be safer than dual antiplatelet therapy. Similarly, oral anticoagulation monotherapy appears superior to anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy in those where oral anticoagulant use is indicated. To date, no risk prediction models have been established to guide antithrombotic therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

Despite the growing volume of TAVR procedures to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis, evidence for adjunctive antithrombotic therapy remains rather scarce. Ongoing clinical trials will provide better understanding to guide antithrombotic therapy.

Antithrombotic selection in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

PURPOSE

Clinical controversy regarding the most appropriate antithrombotic regimen after transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains. Current evidence, guidelines, and recommendations are discussed.

SUMMARY

Antithrombotic selection following transcatheter aortic valve replacement depends on a variety of patient-specific factors. For patients without a preexisting indication for anticoagulation, initial trials employed dual antiplatelet therapy as the postprocedural therapy of choice. Newer studies in this patient population, however, suggest single antiplatelet therapy reduces bleeding events without sacrificing ischemic protection. In patients with a preexisting indication for anticoagulation, warfarin plus single antiplatelet therapy, as opposed to triple antithrombotic therapy, offered similar ischemic protection while reducing clinically significant bleeding. Warfarin monotherapy was associated with a further reduction in bleeding events. One trial demonstrated the safety and efficacy of using apixaban in patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation; however, routine use of rivaroxaban increased adverse cardiac and bleeding events, leaving the utility of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in question.

CONCLUSION

Available evidence and current guidelines point to a lack of consensus regarding antithrombotic selection after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Patient-specific factors and comorbidities must be considered when tailoring therapy, with an emphasis on balancing thrombotic and bleeding risks.

Optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Depending on the timing of AF detection, it is usually categorized as pre-existing AF or new-onset AF. Antiplatelet therapy, rather than a vitamin K antagonist, may be considered as the primary treatment for patients without an indication for oral anticoagulants who undergo TAVR. However, the optimal postprocedural antithrombotic regimen for patients with AF undergoing TAVR remains unknown. In this review, we briefly introduce the management strategies of antithrombotic therapy and list the evidence from related studies to elucidate the optimal antithrombotic management for patients with AF undergoing TAVR.

Comparing anticoagulation therapy alone versus anticoagulation plus single antiplatelet drug therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with an indication for anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy alone versus OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients with an indication for chronic OAC (mostly due to atrial fibrillation) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies. Data was extracted from the eligible studies and outcomes expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 1344 patients with an indication for chronic OAC and undergoing TAVI were included. Of the 1344 patients, 480 patients received OAC therapy alone and 864 patients received OAC plus SAPT. There were no significant differences between OAC alone versus OAC plus SAPT in all-cause mortality (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.84-1.30, p = 0.69) and ischemic stroke (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.95-1.61, p = 0.86). However, OAC alone was associated with significantly lower risks of all bleeding events (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.49-0.69, p < 0.0001) and major and/ life-threatening bleeding events (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.76, p = 0.0002) compared to OAC plus SAPT.

CONCLUSION

In patients with an indication for chronic anticoagulation, post-TAVI antithrombotic therapy with OAC alone compared to OAC plus SAPT may be not significantly different in reducing all-cause mortality and ischemic stroke, but has an important benefit in a significantly lower risk of all bleeding and major and/life-threatening bleeding events.

Anticoagulation with or without Clopidogrel after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

The roles of anticoagulation alone or with an antiplatelet agent after transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) have not been well studied.

METHODS

We performed a randomized trial of clopidogrel in patients undergoing TAVI who were receiving oral anticoagulation for appropriate indications. Patients were assigned before TAVI in a 1:1 ratio not to receive clopidogrel or to receive clopidogrel for 3 months. The two primary outcomes were all bleeding and non-procedure-related bleeding over a period of 12 months. Procedure-related bleeding was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 4 severe bleeding, and therefore most bleeding at the puncture site was counted as non-procedure-related. The two secondary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, non-procedure-related bleeding, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 12 months (secondary composite 1) and a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, ischemic stroke, or myocardial infarction (secondary composite 2), both tested for noninferiority (noninferiority margin, 7.5 percentage points) and superiority.

RESULTS

Bleeding occurred in 34 of the 157 patients (21.7%) receiving oral anticoagulation alone and in 54 of the 156 (34.6%) receiving oral anticoagulation plus clopidogrel (risk ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.90; P = 0.01); most bleeding events were at the TAVI access site. Non-procedure-related bleeding occurred in 34 patients (21.7%) and in 53 (34.0%), respectively (risk ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.92; P = 0.02). Most bleeding occurred in the first month and was minor. A secondary composite 1 event occurred in 49 patients (31.2%) receiving oral anticoagulation alone and in 71 (45.5%) receiving oral anticoagulation plus clopidogrel (difference, -14.3 percentage points; 95% CI for noninferiority, -25.0 to -3.6; risk ratio, 0.69; 95% CI for superiority, 0.51 to 0.92). A secondary composite 2 event occurred in 21 patients (13.4%) and in 27 (17.3%), respectively (difference, -3.9 percentage points; 95% CI for noninferiority, -11.9 to 4.0; risk ratio, 0.77; 95% CI for superiority, 0.46 to 1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing TAVI who were receiving oral anticoagulation, the incidence of serious bleeding over a period of 1 month or 1 year was lower with oral anticoagulation alone than with oral anticoagulation plus clopidogrel. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; POPular TAVI EU Clinical Trials Register number, 2013-003125-28; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02247128.).

Anticoagulation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard of care for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Antithrombotic therapy is required after TAVI to prevent thrombotic complications but it increases the risk of bleeding events. Current clinical guidelines are mostly driven by expert opinion and therefore yield low-grade recommendations. The optimal antithrombotic regimen following TAVI has yet to be determined and several randomised controlled trials assessing this issue are ongoing. The purpose of this article is to critically explore the impact of antithrombotic drugs, especially anticoagulants, on long-term clinical outcomes following successful TAVI.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The performance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement has expanded considerably during the past decade. Technological advances and refinement in implantation techniques have resulted in improved procedural outcomes, whereas indications are progressively extending toward lower-risk patients. Ischemic/embolic complications and major bleeding remain important and strongly correlate to mortality. In this regard, the optimal antithrombotic regimen after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement remains unclear, in the absence of randomized trials. For patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation, empirical treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) for 3 to 6 months is currently recommended. However, dual antiplatelet therapy has been preliminarily associated with increased risk of bleeding compared with single antiplatelet therapy without significant ischemic benefit. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin have also entered clinical investigation, to address the issue of preexisting or new-onset of atrial fibrillation and potentially attenuate subclinical leaflet thrombosis. Clinical trials are necessary to systematically address the risks and benefits of these approaches. In this review, we present the pathophysiological mechanisms of post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement complications and provide updated insights on the rationale behind the various antithrombotic regimens being currently evaluated in large randomized trials.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Aortic Valvular Disease

Over the last few decades, outcomes with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have improved significantly. This has resulted in patients who were denied liver transplantation previously, due to various comorbidities and high risk, now being considered for LDLT. This includes patients with severe valvular heart disease such as aortic stenosis. These patients require aortic valve replacement to help cope with significant perioperative hemodynamic changes. High-risk cardiac procedures like aortic valve replacement are associated with serious perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. Since the advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in 2002, there have been a few case reports of its successful use prior to deceased donor liver transplantation, but there is no literature on this procedure before LDLT. In this article, we report our experience with 2 patients, the first patient with infective endocarditis-induced acute aortic regurgitation and the second patient with bicuspid aortic stenosis who underwent uneventful TAVI followed by successful LDLT. In conclusion, with the increasing expertise and experience in this procedure, an increasing number of potential recipients, previously considered as high-risk transplant candidates, can now be offered liver transplantation by performing pretransplant TAVI.

Antithrombotic strategies after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic strategies in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using network meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses comparing single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), ± oral anticoagulant (OAC) was conducted to determine the appropriate post TAVI antithrombotic regimen. However, there was limited direct comparisons across the different therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through December 2018 to investigate the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic strategies (SAPT, DAPT, OAC, OAC + SAPT, and OAC + DAPT) in patients undergoing TAVI. The main outcome were all-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding events, and stroke.

RESULTS

Our search identified 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 nonrandomized studies, a total of 20,548 patients who underwent TAVI. All OACs were vitamin K antagonists. There was no significant difference on mortality except that OAC + DAPT had significantly higher rates of mortality compared with others (p < .05, I² = 0%). SAPT had significantly lower rates of bleeding compared with DAPT, OAC+SAPT, and OAC+DAPT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59 [0.46-0.77], p < .001, HR: 0.58 [0.34-0.99], p = .045, HR: 0.41 [0.18-0.93], p = .033, respectively, I² = 0%). There was no significant difference on stroke among all antithrombotic strategies.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent TAVI had similar all-cause mortality rates among different antithrombotic strategies except OAC+DAPT. Patients on SAPT had significantly lower bleeding risk than those on DAPT, OAC + SAPT, and OAC + DAPT. Our results suggest SAPT is the preferred regimen when there is no indication for DAPT or OAC. When DAPT or OAC is indicated, DAPT + OAC should be avoided.

Adjunct Pharmacotherapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Status and Future Directions

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a validated treatment option for severe aortic stenosis. Ischemic and thrombotic complications remain important and strongly correlate with mortality. The optimal postprocedural antithrombotic strategy for prevention of thrombotic events remains unclear. The international guidelines for medical management following TAVR are discordant, allowing for significant variance in prescribing habits. The optimal treatment strategy has yet to be delineated. Clinical trials are ongoing to assess the risks and benefits of various strategies. We discuss the pathobiology and rationale for antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, review current evidence and guidelines, and offer a concise evidence-based approach to this subject.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has recently emerged as an effective alternative to medical treatment or surgical aortic valve replacement in all symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and high or prohibitive risk and in intermediate risk when transfemoral access is feasible. Patients undergoing TAVR are often at high risk for either bleeding or cerebrovascular complications, or both, so adjuvant antithrombotic therapies are commonly used before, during and after the procedure. Today, there is no clear evidence on the best antithrombotic regimen in this context. In this review, we will try to go through the mechanisms involved in bleeding and embolic complications and we will discuss the current points of antithrombotic treatment in patients during and after TAVR, with or without oral anticoagulation (OAC) indication.

CT determined psoas muscle area predicts mortality in women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of PMA measurement for mortality.

BACKGROUND

Current surgical risk stratification have limited predictive value in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) population. In TAVI workup, a CT scan is routinely performed but body composition is not analyzed. Psoas muscle area (PMA) reflects a patient's global muscle mass and accordingly PMA might serve as a quantifiable frailty measure.

METHODS

Multi-slice computed tomography scans (between 2010 and 2016) of 583 consecutive TAVI patients were reviewed. Patients were divided into equal sex-specific tertiles (low, mid, and high) according to an indexed PMA. Hazard ratios (HR) and their confidence intervals (CI) were determined for cardiac and all-cause mortality after TAVI.

RESULTS

Low iPMA was associated with cardiac and all-cause mortality in females. One-year adjusted cardiac mortality HR in females for mid-iPMA and high-iPMA were 0.14 [95%CI, 0.05-0.45] and 0.40 [95%CI, 0.15-0.97], respectively. Similar effects were observed for 30-day and 2-years cardiac and all-cause mortality. In females, adding iPMA to surgical risk scores improved the predictive value for 1-year mortality. C-statistics changed from 0.63 [CI = 0.54-0.73] to 0.67 [CI: 0.58-0.75] for EuroSCORE II and from 0.67 [CI: 0.59-0.77] to 0.72 [CI: 0.63-0.80] for STS-PROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Particularly in females, low iPMA is independently associated with an higher all-cause and cardiac mortality. Prospective studies should confirm whether PMA or other body composition parameters should be extracted automatically from CT-scans to include in clinical decision making and outcome prediction for TAVI.

Single or dual antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel as an antiplatelet strategy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is not based on clinical evidence. Here we aim to review updated evidence systemically and assess safety and efficacy of the two antiplatelet regimens.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to retrieve studies involving single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) versus DAPT after TAVR. We screened the records and extracted the data from publications independently. Relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the efficacy and safety of SAPT with that of DAPT in fixed-effects model with Mantel-Haenszel method. The quality of evidence was assessed by the scoring system, GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).

Results

A total of 2,489 patients from 8 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Compared with DAPT, SAPT was associated with a lower all-cause mortality (RR =0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89; P=0.014) and major/life-threatening bleeding (RR =0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.76; P=0.000) in 30 days. Furthermore, there was no significant difference found between SAPT and DAPT group in terms of 30-day stroke (RR =0.85; 95% CI, 0.45-1.63; P=0.631) and death beyond 3 months (RR =0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15; P=0.664).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that compared with DAPT, SAPT after TAVR is more likely to lead to a decline of 30-day mortality along with the reduced risk of bleeding and no increased risk of stroke. However, more clinical data and evidence from randomized controlled trials are warranted to clarify the optimal post-TAVR antiplatelet strategy.

Clinical effects of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Several observational studies have shown that postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) may significantly worsen the prognosis of a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the recent evidence on the impact of AKI on clinical outcomes following TAVI. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed for relevant studies by two independent investigators. We pooled the odds ratio (OR) from individual studies, and performed heterogeneity, quality assessment and publication bias analysis. Forty-three eligible studies comprising 544,112 patients were included. Postoperative AKI not only significantly increased the risk for short-term and long-term all-cause mortality (OR 6.25, 95% CI 5.72-6.83, P < 0.00001; OR 3.49, 95% CI 2.78-4.40, P < 0.00001, respectively), but also increased the risk for early myocardial infarction (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.90-8.31, P = 0.0002), major and life-threatening bleeding (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.12-2.03, P = 0.007; OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.80-3.06, P < 0.00001, respectively), major vascular complications (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.30-2.18, P < 0.0001), need for blood transfusion (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.89-2.46, P < 0.00001) renal replacement therapy (OR 22.36, 95% CI 11.88-42.12, P = 0.0002) and cerebrovascular accidents (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-2.98, P = 0.004). Acute kidney injury following TAVI is associated with increased postoperative mortality and morbidity. Future efforts are required to determine whether early prevention of post-procedural AKI after TAVI impacts upon clinical outcomes.

Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE

: The introduction of percutaneous treatment of severe aortic stenosis with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains one of the greatest achievements of interventional cardiology. In fact, TAVI emerged as a better option than either medical therapy or balloon aortic valvuloplasty for patients who cannot undergo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or are at high surgical risk. Recently, increased operator experience and improved device systems have led to a worldwide trend toward the extension of TAVI to low-risk or intermediate-risk patients. In this expert opinion paper, we first discuss the basic pathophysiology of aortic stenosis in different settings then the key results of recent clinical investigations on TAVI in intermediate-risk aortic stenosis patients are summarized. Particular emphasis is placed on the results of the nordic aortic valve intervention, placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) 2 and Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Randomized trials. The PARTNER 2 was the first large randomized trial that evaluated the outcome of TAVI in patients at intermediate risk. The PARTNER 2 data demonstrated that TAVI is a feasible and reasonable alternative to surgery in intermediate-risk patients (Society of Thoracic Surgeons 4-8%), especially if they are elderly or frail. There was a significant interaction between TAVI approach and mortality, with transfemoral TAVI showing superiority over SAVR. Moreover, we examine the complementary results of the recently concluded Surgical Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation trial. This prospective randomized trial demonstrated that TAVI is comparable with surgery (primary end point 12.6% in the TAVI group vs. 14.0% in the SAVR group) in severe aortic stenosis patients deemed to be at intermediate risk. We review the most relevant clinical evidence deriving from nonrandomized studies and meta-analyses. Altogether, clinical outcome available data suggest that TAVI with a newer generation device might be the preferred treatment option in this patient subgroup. Finally, the differences between the latest European and American Guidelines on TAVI were reported and discussed. The conclusion of this expert opinion article is that TAVI, if feasible, is the treatment of choice in patients with prohibitive or high surgical risk and may lead to similar or lower early and midterm mortality rates compared with SAVR in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Single versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Although dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is currently recommended in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), this practice is not supported by sufficient evidence. This study was performed to compare DAPT to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT).

METHODS

An electronic search was completed of PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies comparing DAPT versus SAPT in patients undergoing TAVI were included.

RESULTS

Seven studies incorporating 1,445 patients were eligible for the present meta-analysis. There were no significant differences on 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63-2.25, p = 0.593), 6-month all-cause mortality (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.49-2.53, p = 0.796), or 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63- 2.25, p = 0.593). DAPT was associated with an increased risk for 30-day (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.85-4.58, p < 0.01), 6-month (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.26-5.10, p < 0.001), and 1-year major and lethal bleeding (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.04-6.77, p = 0.041) based on 896, 337, and 583 patients, respectively, compared to SAPT.

CONCLUSION

Compared to SAPT, DAPT was not shown to be superior in reducing thrombotic events, but presented an increased risk of major/life-threatening bleeding. More randomized controlled trials are needed to provide further evidence.

Antiplatelet therapy in valvular and structural heart disease interventions

Transcatheter interventions for valvular and structural heart diseases are rapidly expanding due to greater operators' experience and development of new generation devices associated with increased procedural safety. They represent the standard strategy for patients with prohibitive risk for open surgery. These procedures are associated with a significant occurrence of both thrombotic and bleeding complications, thus in this setting, even more than in other percutaneous procedures, the balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk is critical. This review describes the current data available on the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system, percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO)/atrial septal defects (ASD) closure.

Cerebrovascular Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative less invasive treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Despite the technological development and knowledge improvement in recent years, neurological complications remain a concern, especially with the expansion of the technique toward younger and lower risk patients. Clinical cerebrovascular events have an important impact on patients' morbidity and mortality with a multifactorial origin. While cerebral microembolizations during TAVI is a universal phenomenon and embolic protection devices have been developed in an attempt to reduce them, their clinical utility remains unclear. We review the current evidence on cerebrovascular events associated with TAVI and potential preventive strategies.

Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Dual- Versus Mono-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Current guidelines recommend dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although some studies suggest mono-antiplatelet therapy is equally efficacious with an improved safety profile. We performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing DAPT with mono-antiplatelet therapy after TAVI. Study quality and heterogeneity were assessed using Jadad score, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Cochran's Q statistics. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed effect models as the primary analysis. Eight studies including 2,439 patients met the inclusion criteria. At 30 days, DAPT was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (OR 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34 to 3.18, p = 0.001), major or life-threatening bleeding (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.60 to 2.59, p <0.001), and major vascular complications (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.51 to 3.06, p <0.001). There was no difference in the rate of the combined end point of stroke or transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction. Outcome data up to 6 months were available in 5 studies; all-cause mortality and stroke were similar between groups, although major or life-threatening bleeding was more frequent with DAPT. In conclusion, in patients undergoing TAVI, DAPT is associated with increased risk at 30 days of all-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, and major vascular complications without a decrease in ischemic complications; at 6 months, the excess bleeding risk persisted. These data suggest a safety concern with DAPT and justify further investigation of the optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen after TAVI.

Analysis of cardiovascular mortality, bleeding, vascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation vs. sinus rhythm undergoing transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVR)

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been demonstrated to be an established therapy for high-risk, inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. For patients with moderate surgical risk, TAVR is equivalent to conventional aortic valve surgery. However, atrial fibrillation (AF) is also present in many of these patients, thus requiring post-implantation oral anticoagulation therapy in addition to the inhibition of thrombocyte aggregation, which poses the risk of bleeding complications. The aim of our work was to investigate the influence of AF on mortality and the occurrence of bleeding, vascular and cerebrovascular complications related to TAVR according to the VARC-2 criteria.

Methods

Two hundred eighty-three patients who underwent TAVR between March 2010 and April 2016 were retrospectively examined. In total, 257 patients who underwent transfemoral access were included in this study. The mean patient age was 81 ± 6 years, 54.1% of the patients were women, and 42.4% had pre-interventional AF.

Results

Compared to patients with sinus rhythm (SR, n = 148), patients with AF (n = 109) had an almost three-fold higher incidence of major vascular complications (AF 14.7% vs. SR 5.4%, p = 0.016) and life-threatening bleeding (AF 11.9% vs. SR 4.1%, p = 0.028) during the first 30 post-procedural days. However, the rate of cerebrovascular complications (AF 3.7% vs. SR 2.7%, p = 0.726) did not significantly differ between the two groups. Overall mortality was significantly higher in patients with AF during the first month (AF 8.3% vs. SR 2.0%, p = 0.032) and the first year (AF 28.4% vs. SR 15.3%; p = 0.020) following TAVR.

Conclusion

Patients with AF had significantly more severe bleeding complications after TAVR, which were significantly related to mortality. Future prospective randomized studies must clarify the optimal anticoagulation therapy for patients with AF after TAVR.

Trial registration

DRKS00011798 on DRKS (Date 17.03.2017).