Incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate periprocedural and perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is little evidence on the impact of current recommendations on the use of antiplatelet therapy during the perioperative and periprocedural period in our setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate use of antiplatelet therapy in a population of patients undergoing surgery or a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure in "real life" in Spain.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter observational study of patients treated with antiplatelet agents requiring intervention was conducted. The incidence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events at 30 days was analyzed according to peri-intervention management of antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

We included 643 patients (31.9% women, 39.0% over 75 years of age), most of them (87.7%) receiving aspirin as antiplatelet therapy at a dose of 100mg/day. Indications for antiplatelet therapy were ischemic heart disease (44.9%), cerebrovascular disease (21.7%), and peripheral vascular disease (23.0%). Ischemic risk was low in 74.3%, while 51.6% had a low bleeding risk of the intervention. Periprocedural management was considered appropriate in 61.7% of cases. 30-day incidence of the combined primary endpoint of thrombotic events and major bleeding (12.1% versus 5.0%; p=0.002) and 30-day mortality (5.2% versus 1.5%; p=0.008) were significantly higher in patients with inappropriate periprocedural management of antiplatelet agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite current recommendations for the use of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative/periprocedural period, their implementation in the "real world" remains low. Inappropriate use is associated with an increased incidence of adverse events, both thrombotic and hemorrhagic.

Exploring the Perioperative Use of DOACs, off the Beaten Track

A notable increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has been observed in the last decade. This trend has surpassed the prescription of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to the absence of the need for regular laboratory monitoring and the more favorable characteristics in terms of efficacy and safety. However, it is very common that patients on DOACs need an interventional or surgical procedure, requiring a careful evaluation and a challenging approach. Therefore, perioperative anticoagulation management of patients on DOACs represents a growing concern for clinicians. Indeed, while several surgical interventions require temporary discontinuation of DOACs, other procedures that involve a lower risk of bleeding can be conducted, maintaining a minimal or uninterrupted DOAC strategy. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of patient characteristics, including age, susceptibility to stroke, previous bleeding complications, concurrent medications, renal and hepatic function, and other factors, in addition to surgical considerations, is mandatory to establish the optimal discontinuation and resumption timing of DOACs. A multidisciplinary approach is required for managing perioperative anticoagulation in order to establish how to face these circumstances. This narrative review aims to provide physicians with a practical guide for DOAC perioperative management, addressing the most controversial issues.

Feasibility and Safety of Bridging Antiplatelet Therapy with Cangrelor in Neuro-Oncology: A Preliminary Experience

Antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for prevention of thrombotic events in patients with a recent history of acute coronary syndromes and/or percutaneous coronary interventions. However, if an urgent surgery is required during antiplatelet therapy, a compromise between the ischemic/thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk has to be reached. Different bridging schemes are reported in the literature, but there is no clear consensus on the optimal treatment strategy in terms of efficacy and safety. Although some indications about the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy regarding specific surgical specializations are available, balancing the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk on an individual basis, no evidence referring to neurosurgical or neuro-oncologic procedures is reported. Herein, we present our preliminary experience in the perioperative management of a patient who underwent a neurosurgical procedure for the resection of a primary malignant brain tumor using an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (cangrelor) as bridging therapy after a recent acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting. The oral P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel) was withdrawn 5 days prior to the surgical procedure and continuous infusion of cangrelor was started 3 days before the surgery at a dose of 0.75 μg/kg/min. Cangrelor was discontinued 2 hours before surgery and resumed 72 hours after tumor resection for further 60 hours. Neither cangrelor-related bleeding nor cardiac ischemic events were observed in the perioperative period and the following 90 days, supporting data regarding the feasibility and safety of this bridging scheme. Further studies are needed to confirm our promising results.

Management of Antithrombotic Drugs in Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: An Intersociety Consensus Document

BACKGROUND

All available recommendations about the management of antithrombotic therapies (ATs) in patients who experienced traumatic brain injury (TBI) are mainly based on expert opinion because of the lack of strength in the available evidence-based medicine. Currently, the withdrawal and the resumption of AT in these patients is empirical, widely variable, and based on the individual assessment of the attending physician. The main difficulty is to balance the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks to improve patient outcome.

METHODS

Under the endorsement of the Neurotraumatology Section of Italian Society of Neurosurgery, the Italian Society for the Study about Haemostasis and Thrombosis, the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care, and the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies, a working group (WG) of clinicians completed two rounds of questionnaires, using the Delphi method, in a multidisciplinary setting. A table for thrombotic and bleeding risk, with a dichotomization in high risk and low risk, was established before questionnaire administration. In this table, the risk is calculated by matching different isolated TBI (iTBI) scenarios such as acute and chronic subdural hematomas, extradural hematoma, brain contusion (intracerebral hemorrhage), and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with patients under active AT treatment. The registered indication could include AT primary prevention, cardiac valve prosthesis, vascular stents, venous thromboembolism, and atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

The WG proposed a total of 28 statements encompassing the most common clinical scenarios about the withdrawal of antiplatelets, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants in patients who experienced blunt iTBI. The WG voted on the grade of appropriateness of seven recommended interventions. Overall, the panel reached an agreement for 20 of 28 (71%) questions, deeming 11 of 28 (39%) as appropriate and 9 of 28 (32%) as inappropriate interventions. The appropriateness of intervention was rated as uncertain for 8 of 28 (28%) questions.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial establishment of a thrombotic and/or bleeding risk scoring system can provide a vital theoretical basis for the evaluation of effective management in individuals under AT who sustained an iTBI. The listed recommendations can be implemented into local protocols for a more homogeneous strategy. Validation using large cohorts of patients needs to be developed. This is the first part of a project to update the management of AT in patients with iTBI.

The effect of antiplatelet therapy on outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: A Japanese single-center study

OBJECTIVES

The number of patients receiving antiplatelet therapy (APT) who have undergone laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is increasing. However, it is unclear whether APT affects the outcomes of patients undergoing radical nephrectomy. We investigated the perioperative outcomes of radical nephrectomy in patients with and without APT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 89 Japanese patients who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinically diagnosed renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at Kokura Memorial Hospital between March 2013 and March 2022. We analyzed information related to APT. We divided the patients into two groups: the APT group (patients receiving APT) and the N-APT group (patients not receiving APT). Moreover, the APT group was further divided into the C-APT group (patients with continuous APT) and the I-APT group (patients with interrupted APT). We compared the surgical outcomes of these groups.

RESULTS

Among 89 patients eligible for the study, 25 received APT and 10 continued APT. Even though the patients who received APT had a high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and many complications, including smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic heart failure, no significant difference in the intra- or postoperative outcomes, including bleeding complications, was observed regardless of whether the patients received APT or continued APT.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, continuation of APT is an acceptable strategy for patients with thromboembolic risk caused by interruption of APT.

Prospective observational registry of perioperative and periprocedural management of antithrombotic therapy in "real world": the REQXAA study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is scarce real-world evidence on the management of perioperative antithrombotic treatment according to current recommendations. The aim of this study was to analyze the management of antithrombotic treatment in patients undergoing surgery or another invasive intervention and to assess the consequences of this management on the occurrence thrombotic or bleeding events.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, multicenter and multispecialty study analyzed patients receiving antithrombotic therapy who underwent surgery or another invasive intervention. The primary endpoint was defined as the incidence of adverse (thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic) events after 30 days of follow-up with respect to management of perioperative antithrombotic drugs.

RESULTS

We included 1266 patients (male: 63.5%; mean age 72.6 years). Nearly half of the patients (48.6%) were under chronic anticoagulation therapy (mainly for atrial fibrillation; CHA2DS2-VASC: 3.7), while 53.3% of the patients were under chronic antiplatelet therapy (mainly for coronary artery disease). Low ischemic and hemorrhagic risk was found in 66.7% and 51.9%, respectively. Antithrombotic therapy management was in line with current recommendations in only 57.3% of the patients. Inappropriate management of antithrombotic therapy was an independent risk factor for both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of recommendations on the perioperative/periprocedural management of antithrombotic therapy in real-world patients is poor. Inappropriate management of antithrombotic treatment is associated with an increase in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events.

Successful Caesarean Section on Ticagrelor Treatment One Day after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Caesarean section is a challenging intervention in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. We present a case of a 32-year-old pregnant woman experiencing large acute myocardial infarction (MI) of the anterolateral wall, complicated by cardiogenic shock in the 38th week of pregnancy, and treated with drug-eluting stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and ticagrelor. Less than 24 h after the MI delivery started, an urgent Caesarean section was indicated. As multiplate aggregometry testing showed a relatively insufficient level of ticagrelor platelet inhibition and a moderate level of aspirin platelet inhibition, a Caesarean section was performed without discontinuation of ticagrelor, which was decided due to the need for emergency surgery. Local hemostatic measures including administration of tranexamic acid were applied. The patient did not experience excessive bleeding. A healthy male baby was born. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of surgery in pregnant women treated with DAPT without ticagrelor discontinuation.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave Lithotripsy

Different international associations have proposed their own guidelines on urolithiasis. However, the focus is primarily on an overview of the principles of urolithiasis management rather than step-by-step technical details for the procedure. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) is releasing a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis. The current guideline on shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the third in the IAU guidelines series and provides a clinical framework for urologists and technicians performing SWL. A total of 49 recommendations are summarized and graded, covering the following aspects: indications and contraindications; preoperative patient evaluation; preoperative medication; prestenting; intraoperative analgesia or anesthesia; intraoperative position; stone localization and monitoring; machine and energy settings; intraoperative lithotripsy strategies; auxiliary therapy following SWL; evaluation of stone clearance; complications; and quality of life. The recommendations, tips, and tricks regarding SWL procedures summarized here provide important and necessary guidance for urologists along with technicians performing SWL. PATIENT SUMMARY: For kidney and urinary stones of less than 20 mm in size, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is an approach in which the stone is treated with shockwaves applied to the skin, without the need for surgery. Our recommendations on technical aspects of the procedure provide guidance for urologists and technicians performing SWL.

Analysing and improving preoperative medication management in cardiac surgery

AIMS

The objective of this study was to analyse the preoperative medication management within the cardiac surgery patient population and measure the effectiveness of an interprofessional intervention in routine care.

METHODS

A jointly developed preoperative medication management was implemented in routine care on multiple levels (inclusion in admission letter to primary care, hotline for inquiries, pocket cards for physicians and correspondence with referring centres). The effectiveness was evaluated by analysing preoperative management before and after implementation. The primary endpoint was the number of drugs managed correctly according to the guidelines after implementation. Secondary endpoints consisted amongst others of bleeding on the intensive care unit, re-thoracotomy, postoperative infarction and cerebrovascular complications. Additionally, possible associations between the correct management and different variables were investigated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

After the implementation, the number of drugs managed correctly according to guidelines increased from 54.0 to 73.5% (P < .001). The effect was more prominent for direct oral anticoagulants and prophylactic aspirin where the guideline adherence increased from 29.2 to 74.5% and from 78.6 to 95.1%, respectively. No difference was seen for sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, metformin, vitamin-K antagonists and dual-antiplatelet therapy. Secondary endpoints showed no safety signals with regard to bleeding or thrombotic events. In multivariate analysis, the intervention was effective (odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval [1.32-3.62]) after adjusting for possible confounders.

CONCLUSION

An interprofessional programme was effective to improve preoperative medication management in cardiac surgery patients. Sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors, metformin and direct oral anticoagulants appear to be especially at risk for incorrect management before cardiac surgery with possible adverse events.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) Guideline on percutaneous nephrolithotomy

The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) would like to release the latest guideline on percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and to provide a clinical framework for surgeons performing PCNLs. These recommendations were collected and appraised from a systematic review and assessment of the literature covering all aspects of PCNLs from the PubMed database between January 1, 1976, and July 31, 2021. Each generated recommendation was graded using a modified GRADE methodology. The quality of the evidence was graded using a classification system modified from the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Forty-seven recommendations were summarized and graded, which covered the following issues, indications and contraindications, stone complexity evaluation, preoperative imaging, antibiotic strategy, management of antithrombotic therapy, anesthesia, position, puncture, tracts, dilation, lithotripsy, intraoperative evaluation of residual stones, exit strategy, postoperative imaging and stone-free status evaluation, complications. The present guideline on PCNL was the first in the IAU series of urolithiasis management guidelines. The recommendations, tips and tricks across the PCNL procedures would provide adequate guidance for urologists performing PCNLs to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNLs.

Does the continuation of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid during the perioperative period of thyroidectomy increase the risk of cervical haematoma? A 1-year experience of two Italian centers

Background

A growing number of patients taking antiplatelet drugs, mainly low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (75–150 mg/day), for primary or secondary prevention of thrombotic events, are encountered in every field of surgery. While the bleeding risk due to the continuation of these medications during the perioperative period has been adequately investigated in several surgical specialties, in thyroid surgery it still needs to be clarified. The main aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of cervical haematoma in patients receiving low-dose acetylsalicylic acid, specifically ASA 100 mg/day, during the perioperative period of thyroidectomy.

Methods

Patients undergoing thyroidectomy in two high-volume thyroid surgery centers in Italy, between January 2021 and December 2021, were retrospectively analysed. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups: those not taking ASA were included in Group A, while those receiving this drug in Group B. Univariate analysis was performed to compare these two groups. Moreover, multivariate analysis was employed to evaluate the use of low-dose ASA as independent risk factor for cervical haematoma.

Results

A total of 412 patients underwent thyroidectomy during the study period. Among them, 29 (7.04%) were taking ASA. Based on the inclusion criteria, 351 patients were enrolled: 322 were included in Group A and 29 in Group B. In Group A, there were 4 (1.24%) cervical haematomas not requiring surgical revision of haemostasis and 4 (1.24%) cervical haematomas requiring surgical revision of haemostasis. In Group B, there was 1 (3.45%) cervical haematoma requiring surgical revision of haemostasis. At univariate analysis, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of occurrence of cervical haematoma, nor of the other early complications of thyroidectomy. At multivariate analysis, the use of low-dose ASA did not prove to be an independent risk factor for cervical haematoma.

Conclusions

Based on our findings, we believe that in patients receiving this drug, either for primary or secondary prevention of thrombotic events, its discontinuation during the perioperative period of thyroidectomy is not necessary.

The safety of pericardiocentesis in patients under antithrombotic therapy: A single-center experience

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the characteristics of patients with pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis and to evaluate the safety of pericardiocentesis without discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing pericardiocentesis in our hospital between 2012 and 2022. Patients were categorized into the Antithrombotic Group if they had used any antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs on the day of pericardiocentesis; otherwise they were categorized into the Non-antithrombotic Group. All procedures were performed by experienced cardiologists with echocardiographic guidance. Bleeding events were defined using the National Institutes of Health scale of adverse events.

Results

A total of 501 consecutive patients were identified and 70 cases were under antithrombotic drugs (Antithrombotic Group). Patients in Antithrombotic Group were older, had more comorbidities, presented with lower platelet counts and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (all p < 0.05). Malignancy was the most common etiology for pericardial effusion in both groups (28.6% in Antithrombotic Group and 54.7% in Non-antithrombotic Group) and tuberculosis was the second etiology in the Non-antithrombotic Group (21.9%), while procedure-related effusion (17.1%) accounted for the second cause in the Antithrombotic Group. Two patients in the Antithrombotic Group had mild oozing at the puncture site that resolved without interventions (2.9 vs. 0%, p = 0.019), and no bleeding events higher than Grade 1 occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Although antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs may put patients undergoing pericardiocentesis at theoretically higher risk of bleeding, our study demonstrated that they are not associated with increased major bleeding complications.

[Peri-interventional management of platelet aggregation inhibition and anticoagulation in urology]

Perioperative management of anticoagulation in patients receiving long-term anticoagulation or platelet aggregation inhibitors requires an individual consideration of competing risks. If the risk for bleeding is low, anticoagulation can often be continued. If it is necessary to pause anticoagulation, the necessity and dosage of bridging must be determined based on the individual risk of thromboembolism. Only patients with a high risk of thromboembolism should receive bridging in the full therapeutic dosage. The timing of pausing anticoagulation depends on the risk of bleeding from the urological intervention and the renal function of the patient. Platelet aggregation inhibitors should not be discontinued in the first month after coronary stent implantation, especially after acute coronary syndrome.

The Risk of Bleeding and Adverse Events with Clopidogrel in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients

Orthopedic surgeons often face a clinical dilemma on how to manage antiplatelet therapies during the time of surgery. This retrospective study is aimed to investigate the bleeding risk and adverse events in patients who hold or keep clopidogrel during elective major joints arthroplasty. Two hundred and ninety-six patients that were treated with clopidogrel while undergoing total hip or knee joint replacement between January 2009 and December 2018 were studied. Group 1 included 56 patients (18.9%) who kept using clopidogrel preoperatively. Group 2 included 240 patients who hold clopidogrel use ≥5 days preoperatively. Blood transfusion rates, estimated blood loss, complication rates, and adverse cardiocerebral events were collected and analyzed. The mean total blood loss was more in the group 1 patients as compared with that in the group 2 patients (1212.3 mL (685.8 to 2811.8) vs. 1068.9 mL (495.6 to 3294.3), p = 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups of patients regarding transfusion rates, bleeding-related complications, and infection rates. There was a trend toward a higher incidence of adverse cardiocerebral events in patients withholding clopidogrel for more than 5 days before surgery. The results of this study suggest that clopidogrel continuation could be safe and advisable for patients at thrombotic risk undergoing primary major joint replacement. Acute antiplatelet withdrawal for an extended period of time might be associated with an increased risk of postoperative thromboembolic events. More studies are required in the future to further prove this suggestion.

Bridging unter Antikoagulation und Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung

When bridging anticoagulation, the risk of bleeding - compared to the thromboembolic risk - is often underestimated. Bridging is only indicated in case of high (and possibly moderate) thromboembolic risk. When bridging patients with indication for dual antiplatelet therapy, an interdisciplinary case discussion should take place to assess the risk.

Impact of aspirin discontinuation on thrombotic complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

The number of patients taking antiplatelet therapy is increasing. However, there is no definitive guideline for the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy. Conventionally, the discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs has been the basic treatment as perioperative management. Therefore, we investigated the risk of discontinuing aspirin concerning thrombotic complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 729 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Toyonaka Municipal Hospital. Sixty-four patients taking antithrombotic drugs aside from aspirin were excluded from this study; the remaining 665 patients were considered eligible and divided into three groups. The patients not taking aspirin were classified as the "Control group" (n = 588). Among the patients taking aspirin, those who continued preoperative aspirin were classified as the "Aspirin group" (n = 30), and those who discontinued preoperative aspirin were classified as the "No-aspirin group" (n = 47). The Aspirin, No-aspirin, and Control groups were compared retrospectively.

RESULT

Among the 3 groups, there were no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.14), bleeding volume (p = 0.63), or postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.06). Assessing the postoperative complication, bleeding complications were significantly more frequent in the Aspirin group (p < 0.01), although those complications were all Clavien-Dindo grade II. In contrast, thrombotic complications were significantly more frequent in the No-aspirin group (p < 0.01). Note that those complications were all Clavien-Dindo Grade III/IV. This result suggested that discontinuing aspirin increased the risk of severe thrombotic complication.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of aspirin as perioperative management in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery increased the risk of severe thrombotic complications.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease in 2022—From Population to Patient-Centered Approaches

Antiplatelet agents, with aspirin and P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists as major key molecules, are currently the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of atherothrombotic events including a variety of cardio- and cerebro-vascular as well as peripheral artery diseases. Over the last decades, significant changes have been made to antiplatelet therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. The shift from a population-based approach to patient-centered precision medicine requires greater awareness of individual risks and benefits associated with the different antiplatelet strategies, so that the right patient gets the right therapy at the right time. In this review, we present the currently available antiplatelet agents, outline different management strategies, particularly in case of bleeding or in perioperative setting, and develop the concept of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and the steps toward person-centered precision medicine aiming to optimize patient care.

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban bridge as an alternative to suspension of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review

Use of a tirofiban bridge is an alternative to simply withdrawing dual antiplatelet therapy prior to operating on patients at high risk of stent thrombosis and bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol in patients undergoing surgery within 12 months of a percutaneous coronary intervention involving stenting. We performed a systematic review based on searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Lilacs, and Scielo databases and of the references of relevant articles on the topic. Five of the 107 studies identified were included after application of eligibility criteria and analysis of methodological quality, totaling 422 patients, 227 in control groups. Notwithstanding the limitations reported, four of the five studies included indicate that the tirofiban bridge technique is effective for reducing adverse cardiac events and is safe in terms of not interfering with the risk of hemorrhagic events or bleeding. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to provide robust evidence.

Preoperative Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: Implementing a Systematic Stepwise Approach during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

Major adverse cardiac events, defined as death or myocardial infarction, are common causes of perioperative mortality and major morbidity in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Reduction of perioperative cardiovascular risk in relation to non-cardiac surgery requires a stepwise patient evaluation that integrates clinical risk factors, functional status and the estimated stress of the planned surgical procedure. Major guidelines on preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment recommend to establish, firstly, the risk of surgery per se (low, moderate, high) and the related timing (elective vs. urgent/emergent), evaluate the presence of unstable cardiac conditions or a recent coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting), assess the functional capacity of the patient (usually expressed in metabolic equivalents), determine the value of non-invasive and/or invasive cardiovascular testing and then combine these data in estimating perioperative risk for major cardiac adverse events using validated scores (Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) or National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)). This stepwise approach has the potential to guide clinicians in determining which patients could benefit from cardiovascular therapy and/or coronary artery revascularization before non-cardiac surgery towards decreasing the incidence of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Finally, it should be highlighted that there is a need to implement specific strategies in the 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19 infection during the preoperative risk assessment process.

Perioperative Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Management with Endodontic Microsurgical Techniques

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to review evidence-based recommendations for the safe perioperative management of patients undergoing endodontic microsurgery who are currently taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications. Using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format, the following scientific question was asked: In patients taking anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, what is the available evidence in the management of endodontic microsurgery?

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to identify current recommendations regarding the management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications in the context of outpatient dental surgical procedures. Additionally, the authors hand searched the bibliographies of all relevant articles, the gray literature, and textbooks. Because of the lack of clinical studies and evidence on this subject, articles and guidelines from other organizations and association position statements were included.

RESULTS

Because any minor surgery can become a major surgery, the treating doctor needs to best assess the risk of bleeding, especially if the surgery is anticipated to take longer than 45 minutes. Every patient should be stratified on a case-by-case basis. Consultation with the patient's physician is highly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to maximize the effects of these medications (to prevent thrombosis) while minimizing the potential risks (procedural hemorrhage), clinicians should be aware of the best available evidence when considering continuation or discontinuation of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents perioperatively for endodontic microsurgery. Ideally, a joint effort from an expert panel for microsurgery would be warranted.

Perioperative implications of newer generation drug-eluting coronary stents: A narrative review

Newer generation drug-eluting stents are the most commonly inserted stent in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention. This narrative review focuses on the evidence underpinning the perioperative management of patients with newer generation drug-eluting stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Six studies reported the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events according to the time interval from percutaneous coronary intervention to non-cardiac surgery, and the comparative risks of newer and first generation drug-eluting stents. No study demonstrated an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events once three months had elapsed between stent implantation and non-cardiac surgery. Only one study included patients with third and fourth generation drug-eluting stents. Seven studies analysed the relationship between antiplatelet therapy, major adverse cardiovascular events and perioperative bleeding. The risks of major adverse cardiovascular events do not appear to be increased if antiplatelet therapy is ceased for less than seven days but are increased if it is discontinued for more than seven days. Most studies reported no differences in the incidence of major bleeding associated with antiplatelet therapy. The risk of perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events in non-cardiac surgery does not appear to be increased after three months following implantation with newer generation drug-eluting stents. However, the possibility of increased risk cannot be excluded as most studies were inadequately powered. The thrombotic risk is substantially reduced in patients with fourth (polymer free) generation drug-eluting stents, and urgent non-cardiac surgery can be considered one month after percutaneous coronary intervention. Larger multicentre studies are needed to define the optimal window for non-cardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention and provide definitive perioperative strategies for patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery after the implantation of newer generation drug-eluting stents.

Use of Vivostat® Autologous Fibrin Sealant in Thyroid Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Post-thyroidectomy hemorrhage is a rare but potentially life-threatening and unpredictable complication of thyroid surgery. Therefore, intraoperative bleeding control and hemostasis are crucial. However, the most efficient, cost-effective, and standardized way to achieve this is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of total thyroidectomy (TT) and partial thyroidectomy (PT) performed using the Vivostat® hemostatic system (Vivostat A/S, Lillerød, Denmark).

METHODS

Patients underwent TT and PT for benign and malignant diseases (multinodular goiter, Graves' disease, differentiated thyroid carcinoma). The primary endpoint was 1st-day postoperative drain output and bleeding that required reintervention. Secondary endpoints included surgery duration and postsurgical complications (vocal fold palsy, hypocalcemia, seroma, wound infection).

RESULTS

Between October 2020 and December 2020, 56 patients were enrolled; 69.6% female; mean age 49.5 years. The mean 24-h drain output was 40 ml. No redo surgery was needed. Seroma was present in 5.3% of cases; no permanent vocal palsy or hypocalcemia was observed.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the Vivostat® system is both safe and effective for hemostasis during thyroid surgery.

Trigger and Target for Fibrinogen Supplementation Using Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in Patients Undergoing Open Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between the value of fibrinogen assessed by the FIBTEM clot amplitude at 10 minutes (A10 FIBTEM) measured on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the amount of drainage output at 24 hours, to investigate whether the A10 FIBTEM predicts severe bleeding (SB), and to define A10 FIBTEM thresholds to prevent (trigger) and treat (target) severe bleeding by fibrinogen supplementation.

METHODS

In a single centre, retrospective observational study, 166 patients underwent elective open thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair between March 2016 and January 2019. Exclusion criteria were emergency, congenital, or acquired coagulopathy, or administration of P₂Y₁₂ inhibitor antiplatelet agents in the five days before surgery. All patients were managed intra-operatively and post-operatively according to a rotational thromboelastometry driven transfusion protocol. The principal endpoint was a composite outcome, which included bleeding, large volume transfusion, and re-operation.

RESULTS

FIBTEM clot amplitude after 10 minutes measured on ICU admission and post-operative bleeding at 24 hours showed an inverse linear relationship (R² = .03; p = .026). Performance of A10 FIBTEM in predicting SB evaluated by Receiving Operating Curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% CI 0.56 - 0.70; p = .026) with a best cutoff of 9 mm. An A10 FIBTEM of 3 mm was the cutoff associated with a positive predictive value of 50%, while an A10 FIBTEM of 9 mm showed a negative predictive value of 92%. On multivariable analysis, an A10 FIBTEM ≤ 3 mm remained independently associated with SB.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation shows for the first time in a population undergoing open TAAA repair that an A10 FIBTEM ≤ 3mm on ICU admission is associated with post-operative severe bleeding. Trigger and target values for fibrinogen supplementation, based on A10 FIBTEM, have been provided. The transferability and reliability of these cutoff values require further study.

Antiplatelet Therapy with Cangrelor in Patients Undergoing Surgery after Coronary Stent Implantation: A Real-World Bridging Protocol Experience

Objective  The aim of the study is to describe the real-world use of the P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor cangrelor as a bridging strategy in patients at high thrombotic risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and referred to surgery requiring perioperative withdrawal of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Materials and Methods  We collected data from nine Italian centers on patients with previous PCI who were still on DAPT and undergoing nondeferrable surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation. A perioperative standardized bridging protocol with cangrelor was used.

Results  Between December 2017 and April 2019, 24 patients (mean age 72 years; male 79%) were enrolled. All patients were at high thrombotic risk after PCI and required nondeferrable intermediate to high bleeding risk surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation (4.6 ± 1.7 days). Cangrelor infusion was started at a bridging dose (0.75 µg/kg/min) 3 days before planned surgery and was discontinued 6.6 ± 1.5 hours prior to surgical incision. In 55% of patients, cangrelor was resumed at 9 ± 6 hours following surgery for a mean of 39 ± 38 hours. One cardiac death was reported after 3 hours of cangrelor discontinuation prior to surgery. No ischemic outcomes occurred after surgery and up to 30-days follow-up. The mean hemoglobin drop was <2 g/dL; nine patients received blood transfusions consistent with the type of surgery, but no life-threatening or fatal bleeding occurred.

Conclusion  Perioperative bridging therapy with cangrelor is a feasible approach for stented patients at high thrombotic risk and referred to surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation. Larger studies are warranted to support the safety of this strategy.

Perioperative Blood Management Strategies for Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: Where Do We Currently Stand on This Matter?

Total hip replacement (THR) has proved to be a reliable treatment for the end stage of hip osteoarthritis. It is a common orthopaedic procedure with excellent results, but is associated with significant blood loss and high rates of allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The potential complications and adverse events after ABT, combined with the ongoing research, have resulted in multimodel, multidisciplinary blood management strategies adoption, aiming to reduce the blood loss and transfusion rates. Many reviews and meta-analyses have tried to demonstrate the best blood management strategies. The purpose of this study is to review any evidence-based blood conserving technique, dividing them in three stages: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative.

The Pharmacological Approach to Oncologic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, 15% have concomitant cancer, especially in the first 6 months after their diagnosis, as well as in advanced metastatic stages. Lung, gastric, and pancreatic cancers are the most frequent malignancies associated with ACS. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy exert prothrombotic, vasospastic, and proinflammatory actions. The management of cancer patients with ACS is quite challenging: percutaneous revascularization is often underused, and antiplatelet and anticoagulant pharmacological therapy should be individually tailored to the thrombotic risk and to the bleeding complications. Sometimes oncological patients also show different degrees of thrombocytopenia, which further complicates the pharmacological strategies. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding the treatment of ACS in cancer patients and to suggest the optimal management and therapy to reduce the risk of adverse coronary events after ACS in this high-risk population.

[SBA 2020: Regional anesthesia guideline for using anticoagulants update]

The development of protocols to prevent perioperative Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and the introduction of increasingly potent antithrombotic drugs have resulted in concerns of increased risk of neuraxial bleeding. Since the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) 2014 guideline, new oral anticoagulant drugs were approved by international regulating agencies, and by ANVISA. Societies and organizations that try to approach concerns through guidelines have presented conflicting perioperative management recommendations. As a response to these issues and to the need for a more rational approach, managements were updated in the present narrative revision, and guideline statements made. They were projected to encourage safe and quality patient care, but cannot assure specific results. Like any clinical guide recommendation, they are subject to review as knowledge grows, on specific complications, for example. The objective was to assess safety aspects of regional analgesia and anesthesia in patients using antithrombotic drugs, such as: possible technique-associated complications; spinal hematoma-associated risk factors, prevention strategies, diagnosis and treatment; safe interval for discontinuing and reinitiating medication after regional blockade.

Risk of perioperative coronary stent stenosis or occlusion in patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

OBJECTIVES

There is an ongoing discussion about how to treat coronary stents during bypass surgery: Should patent stents be left alone and the stented vessels be ungrafted, or should every stented coronary artery receive a bypass graft? This study aims to determine the relevance of perioperative stent stenosis or occlusion on postoperative outcomes up to 3 years postoperatively.

METHODS

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) (±concomitant procedures) with previous percutaneous coronary intervention from 4 centres were prospectively included in this observatory study between April 2015 and June 2017. A coronary angiography was conducted between the fifth and seventh postoperative days. The preoperative and postoperative angiograms were assessed in a core laboratory, assessing the patencies of coronary stents and bypass grafts. The core lab investigators were blinded to the patients' characteristics and perioperative course.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included in the study. In the postoperative coronary angiography, 265 bypass grafts and 189 coronary stents were examined angiographically. Ninety-seven percent of preoperatively patent stents remained patent. New coronary stent stenoses were observed in 5 patients (4.7%). All 5 patients were asymptomatic and managed conservatively. Bypass stenoses were observed in 12 patients (11%), of whom were managed conservatively, 4 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and 1 underwent redo-CABG. Two years postoperatively, 97% of patients were alive. Patients with new stent stenosis tended to have a better survival compared with patients with bypass stenosis (100% vs 73%; P = 0.09) up to 3 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative coronary stent stenosis occurs rarely. It is safe to leave a patently stented coronary vessel without bypass grafting.

Development of an application for management of drug holidays in perioperative periods

Before surgery and other invasive treatments, decisions must be made on whether to discontinue drugs and provide appropriate drug holidays especially for antithrombotic drugs, and this is made difficult by the large number of available drugs and associated guidelines. We have therefore developed an online application for perioperative drug discontinuation and resumption management, named Saga Application for Management of Drug Holidays in PeriOperative Periods (SAMPOP).Multidisciplinary medical staff at Saga University Hospital (SUH) worked together to build an evidence-based Perioperative Drug Discontinuation Management Database (PDDMD) and developed the user-friendly SAMPOP online application via preliminary verification at SUH. From September 2018 to February 2020, 420 medical staff at SUH, including physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, installed and tested SAMPOP.Rate per surgical procedure for forgetting to discontinue antithrombotic drugs preoperatively decreased from 0.18% to 0.09% as of August 2019, 12 months after the introduction of SAMPOP (P = .1359). In addition, six months later, it decreased further to 0.03% as of February 2020 (P = .0436). Forgetting to resume antithrombotic drugs postoperatively decreased from 0.20% to 0.02% as of August 2019, 12 months after the introduction of SAMPOP (P = .0008). There was no case of forgetting to resume the medication in the last 6 months.SAMPOP may be useful for management of drug holidays in the clinic and warrants further evaluation of its safety and efficacy.

Consensus Report on Patient Blood Management in Cardiac Surgery by Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (TSCVS), Turkish Society of Cardiology (TSC), and Society of Cardio-Vascular-Thoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SCTAIC)

Anemia, transfusion and bleeding independently increase the risk of complications and mortality in cardiac surgery. The main goals of patient blood management are to treat anemia, prevent bleeding, and optimize the use of blood products during the perioperative period. The benefit of this program has been confirmed in many studies and its utilization is strongly recommended by professional organizations. This consensus report has been prepared by the authors who are the task members appointed by the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkish Society of Cardiology (TSC), and Society of Cardio-Vascular-Thoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care to raise the awareness of patient blood management. This report aims to summarize recommendations for all perioperative blood- conserving strategies in cardiac surgery.

Perioperative Management of Antiplatelet Therapy in Ophthalmic Surgery

Many patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery are elderly with comorbidities requiring antiplatelet therapy to prevent thromboembolic or atherothrombotic events. The use of antiplatelet therapy has expanded over the years, predisposing these patients to hemorrhagic complications perioperatively. The risk of hemorrhagic complications must be weighed against the risk of thromboembolic events with cessation of antiplatelet therapy. The decision to continue or interrupt antiplatelet therapy in the setting of ophthalmic surgery is based upon various factors, including the type of surgery and each patient’s comorbidities. This review examines the risks of thrombotic complications versus hemorrhagic complications in different types of ophthalmic surgeries with the use of antiplatelet medications and provides evidence-based recommendations regarding perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy

Risks of noncardiac surgery early after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Prior registry data suggest that 4%-20% of patients require noncardiac surgery (NCS) within 2 years of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Contemporary data on NCS after PCI in the United States among women and men are limited. We determined the rate of early hospital readmission for NCS and associated outcomes in a large cohort of patients who underwent PCI in the United States.

METHODS

Adults undergoing PCI between January 1 and June 30, 2014, were identified from the Nationwide Readmission Database. Patients readmitted for NCS within 6 months of PCI were identified. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI), and bleeding defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes.

RESULTS

Among 221,379 patients who underwent PCI and survived to hospital discharge, 3.5% (n = 7,696) were readmitted for NCS within 6 months post-PCI, and 41% of these hospitalizations were elective. Early NCS was complicated by MI in 4.7% of cases, and 21% of perioperative MIs were fatal. Bleeding was recorded in 32.0% of patients. All-cause mortality occurred in 4.4% of patients (n = 339) readmitted for surgery. The risk of death or MI was greatest when NCS was performed within the first month after PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite clear guidelines to avoid surgery early after PCI, NCS was performed in 1 of every 29 patients with recent PCI, corresponding to as many as ~30,000 patients each year nationwide. Surgical mortality and perioperative MI were high in this setting. Strategies to minimize perioperative thrombotic and bleeding risks during readmission for NCS after PCI are necessary.

Surgical thromboprophylaxis in daily urologic surgery: Beyond bridge therapy

INTRODUCTION

With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice.

OBJECTIVES

To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based.

RESULTS

Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the current guidelines, there might be an overuse of heparins in the daily clinical practice. The development of -direct oral- anticoagulants have shown to reduce the time to reintroduction of medication for chronic conditions as well as a more effective bleeding management.

Aortic dissection patients mimic acute coronary syndrome with preoperative antiplatelet therapy

Background

Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is often misdiagnosed as an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and antiplatelet therapy (APT) for ACS will influence the timing and outcome of ATAAD. We reviewed the surgical outcome of these misdiagnosed ATAAD patients.

Methods

From January 2011 to December 2015, 309 ATAAD patients received surgical therapy in our department, among whom 15 patients were misdiagnosed as ACS and took oral APT. We retrospectively reviewed the data of the perioperative and follow-up period.

Results

The average age of these 15 patients was 60.6±8.7 years old (9 males, 6 females). Five patients took aspirin orally, and 10 took aspirin and clopidogrel. Operations were performed 7, 3, and 1 day after stopping the agents in 2, 3, and 1 patient, respectively; the other 5 patients received emergency operation without stopping the agents. The cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 259.7±64.8 minutes, aortic cross-clamp time was 181.0±51.7 minutes, and selective cerebral perfusion and lower body arrest time were 34.9±8.1 minutes. There were two in-hospital deaths due to circulation failure (mortality 13.3%). The average drainage volume in the first 24 h after operation was 800.7±598.8 mL. During a mean follow-up period of 20.6±17.4 months, one patient had a sudden death.

Conclusions

ATAAD misdiagnosed as ACS is not rare, and APT will increase the risk of bleeding in ATAAD patients. The decision of operation time relies on considering the balance between the rupture risk of aortic dissection and the hemorrhage risk of APT. The emergency operation for these patients will increase bleeding and transfusion.

A Multidisciplinary Approach on the Perioperative Antithrombotic Management of Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Surgery: Surgery After Stenting 2

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients treated with coronary stents undergoing surgery remains poorly defined. Importantly, surgery represents a common reason for premature treatment discontinuation, which is associated with an increased risk in mortality and major adverse cardiac events. However, maintaining antithrombotic therapy to minimize the incidence of perioperative ischemic complications may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Although guidelines provide some recommendations with respect to the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy, these have been largely developed according to the thrombotic risk of the patient and a definition of the hemorrhagic risk specific to each surgical procedure, key to defining the trade-off between ischemia and bleeding, is not provided. These observations underscore the need for a multidisciplinary collaboration among cardiologists, anesthesiologists, hematologists and surgeons to reach this goal. The present document is an update on practical recommendations for standardizing management of antithrombotic therapy management in patients treated with coronary stents (Surgery After Stenting 2) in various types of surgery according to the predicted individual risk of thrombotic complications against the anticipated risk of surgical bleeding complications. Cardiologists defined the thrombotic risk using a "combined ischemic risk" approach, while surgeons classified surgeries according to their inherent hemorrhagic risk. Finally, a multidisciplinary agreement on the most appropriate antithrombotic treatment regimen in the perioperative phase was reached for each surgical procedure.

Ileal perforation caused by a fish bone shortly after drug-eluting stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction

During the past century, the incidence of myocardial infarction has markedly increased worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is often considered as the first-choice treatment, especially in emergency cases. Current guidelines recommend delayed elective noncardiac surgery for such vulnerable patients. However, few suggestions are available regarding the exact treatment strategy for patients who have already undergone percutaneous coronary intervention but suddenly need emergent noncardiac surgery for an unrelated reason. We herein present a case involving a patient with acute myocardial infarction who had undergone implantation of a drug-eluting stent and developed an ileal perforation due to fish bone ingestion 3 days postoperatively. After carefully balancing the risks of stent thrombosis and uncontrollable bleeding, dual antiplatelet therapy and low-molecular-weight heparin were given with close monitoring. Emergency laparotomy and partial small bowel resection surgery were then performed, after which the patient eventually recovered. This case indicates a possible management strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by emergency noncardiac surgery.

Bridging with Tirofiban During Temporary Withdrawal of Oral Antiplatelets for Two Major Surgical Procedures in High Ischaemic Risk Patients

Background:

Recent coronary stent implantation requires Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for at least 6 months. Serious issues are raised when non-cardiac surgery is required during this period, because of the balance between ischemic and haemorrhagic complications.

Case Reports:

We report 2 high ischemic risk cases requiring intermediate bleeding risk non-cardiac surgery, during the first month of DAPT initiation. Perioperative management with discontinuation of the P2Y12 inhibitor and bridging with tirofiban, while aspirin was uninterrupted, was uneventful.

Conclusion:

Bridging with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors may be a safe and effective alternative to P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation in non-deferrable non-cardiac surgery.

Clinical standards for patient blood management and perioperative hemostasis and coagulation management. Position Paper of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)

Patient blood management is currently defined as the application of evidence based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain hemoglobin (Hb), optimize hemostasis and minimize blood loss to improve patient outcome. Blood management focus on the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures in which significant blood loss occurs or is expected. Preventive strategies are emphasized to identify and manage anemia, reduce iatrogenic blood losses, optimize hemostasis (e.g. pharmacologic therapy, and point of care testing); establish decision thresholds for the appropriate administration of blood therapy. This goal was motivated historically by known blood risks including transmissible infectious disease, transfusion reactions, and potential effects of immunomodulation. Patient blood management has been recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the new standard of care and has urged all 193-member countries of WHO to implement this concept. There is a pressing need for this new "standard of care" so as to reduce blood transfusion and promote the availability of transfusion alternatives. Patient blood management therefore encompasses an evidence-based medical and surgical approach that is multidisciplinary (transfusion medicine specialists, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists) and multiprofessional (physicians, nurses, pump technologists and pharmacists). The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) organized a consensus project involving a Task Force of expert anesthesiologists that reviewing literature provide appropriate levels of care and good clinical practices. Hence, this article focuses on achieving goals of PBM in the perioperative period.