1
|
Müller-Graff FT, Spahn B, Herrmann DP, Kurz A, Völker J, Hagen R, Rak K. Comprehensive literature review on the application of the otological surgical planning software OTOPLAN® for cochlear implantation. HNO 2024:10.1007/s00106-023-01417-4. [PMID: 38861031 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-023-01417-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The size of the human cochlear, measured by the diameter of the basal turn, varies between 7 and 11 mm. For hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), the size of the cochlear influences the individual frequency map and the choice of electrode length. OTOPLAN® (CAScination AG [Bern, Switzerland] in cooperation with MED-EL [Innsbruck, Austria]) is a software tool with CE marking for clinical applications in CI treatment which allows for precise pre-planning based on cochlear size. This literature review aims to analyze all published data on the application of OTOPLAN®. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied to identify relevant studies published in the PubMed search engine between January 2015 and February 2023 using the search terms "otoplan" [title/abstract] OR "anatomy-based fitting" [title/abstract] OR "otological software tool" [title/abstract] OR "computed tomography-based software AND cochlear" [title/abstract]. RESULTS The systematic review of the literature identified 32 studies on clinical use of OTOPLAN® in CI treatment. Most studies were reported from Germany (7 out of 32), followed by Italy (5), Saudi Arabia (4), the USA (4), and Belgium (3); 2 studies each were from Austria and China, and 1 study from France, India, Norway, South Korea, and Switzerland. In the majority of studies (22), OTOPLAN® was used to assess cochlear size, followed by visualizing the electrode position using postoperative images (5), three-dimensional segmentation of temporal bone structures (4), planning the electrode insertion trajectory (3), creating a patient-specific frequency map (3), planning of a safe drilling path through the facial recess (3), and measuring of temporal bone structures (1). CONCLUSION To date, OTOPLAN® is the only DICOM viewer with CE marking in the CI field that can process pre-, intra-, and postoperative images in the abovementioned applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Björn Spahn
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - David P Herrmann
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Völker
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Kristen Rak
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery and the Comprehensive Hearing Center, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller-Graff FT, Spahn B, Herrmann DP, Kurz A, Voelker J, Hagen R, Rak K. [Comprehensive literature review on the application of the otological-surgical planning software OTOPLAN® for cochlear implantation. German version]. HNO 2024:10.1007/s00106-024-01461-8. [PMID: 38587661 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-024-01461-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The size of the human cochlear, measured by the diameter of the basal turn, varies between 7 and 11 mm. For hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), the size of the cochlear influences the individual frequency map and the choice of electrode length. OTOPLAN® (CAScination AG [Bern, Switzerland] in cooperation with MED-EL [Innsbruck, Austria]) is a software tool with CE marking for clinical applications in CI treatment which allows for precise pre-planning based on cochlear size. This literature review aims to analyze all published data on the application of OTOPLAN®. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied to identify relevant studies published in the PubMed search engine between January 2015 and February 2023 using the search terms "otoplan" [title/abstract] OR "anatomy-based fitting" [title/abstract] OR "otological software tool" [title/abstract] OR "computed tomography-based software AND cochlear" [title/abstract]. RESULTS The systematic review of the literature identified 32 studies on clinical use of OTOPLAN® in CI treatment. Most studies were reported from Germany (7 out of 32), followed by Italy (5), Saudi Arabia (4), the USA (4), and Belgium (3); 2 studies each were from Austria and China, and 1 study from France, India, Norway, South Korea, and Switzerland. In the majority of studies (22), OTOPLAN® was used to assess cochlear size, followed by visualizing the electrode position using postoperative images (5), three-dimensional segmentation of temporal bone structures (4), planning the electrode insertion trajectory (3), creating a patient-specific frequency map (3), planning of a safe drilling path through the facial recess (3), and measuring of temporal bone structures (1). CONCLUSION To date, OTOPLAN® is the only DICOM viewer with CE marking in the CI field that can process pre-, intra-, and postoperative images in the abovementioned applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
| | - Björn Spahn
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - David P Herrmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Anja Kurz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Johannes Voelker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Kristen Rak
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zagabathuni A, Padi KK, Kameswaran M, Subramani K. Development of Automated Tool for Electrode Array Insertion and its Study on Intracochlear Pressure. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:1388-1395. [PMID: 37584398 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implantation is the most successful approach for people with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Manual insertion of the electrode array may result in damaging the soft tissue structures and basilar membrane. An automated electrode array insertion device is reported to be less traumatic in cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES The present work develops a simple, reliable, and compact device for automatically inserting the electrode array during cochlear implantation and test the device to observe intracochlear pressure during simulated electrode insertion. METHODS The device actuates the electrode array by a roller mechanism. For testing the automated device, a straight cochlea having the dimension of the scala tympani and a model electrode is developed using a 3D printer. A pressure sensor is utilized to observe the pressure change at different insertional conditions. RESULTS The electrode is inserted into a prototype cochlea at different speeds without any pause, and it is noticed that the pressure is increased with the depth of insertion of the electrode irrespective of the speed of electrode insertion. The rate of pressure change is observed to be increased exponentially with the speed of insertion. CONCLUSION At an insertion speed of 0.15 mm/s, the peak pressure is observed to be 133 Pa, which can be further evaluated in anatomical models for clinical scenarios. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A Laryngoscope, 134:1388-1395, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Zagabathuni
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Calicut, India
| | - Kishore Kumar Padi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India
| | | | - Kanagaraj Subramani
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heuninck E, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Mertens G, Topsakal V. Audiological outcomes of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:4433-4444. [PMID: 37043021 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07961-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term and long-term audiological outcomes in patients who underwent cochlear implantation with a robot-assisted system to enable access to the cochlea, and to compare outcomes with a matched control group of patients who underwent cochlear implantation with conventional access to the cochlea. METHODS In total, 23 patients were implanted by robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS). To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic surgery in terms of audiological outcomes, a statistically balanced control group of conventionally implanted patients was created. Minimal outcome measures (MOM), consisting of pure-tone audiometry, speech understanding in quiet and speech understanding in noise were performed pre-operatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years post-activation of the audioprocessor. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in pure-tone audiometry, speech perception in quiet and speech perception in noise between robotically implanted and conventionally implanted patients pre-operatively, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years post-activation. A significant improvement in pure-tone hearing thresholds, speech understanding in quiet and speech understanding in noise with the cochlear implant has been quantified as of the first measurements at 3 months and this significant improvement remained stable over a time period of 2 years for HEARO implanted patients. CONCLUSION Clinical outcomes in robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery are comparable to conventional cochlear implantation. CLINICALTRAILS. GOV TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT03746613 (date of registration: 19/11/2018), NCT04102215 (date of registration: 25/09/2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Heuninck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abari J, Heuninck E, Al Saadi M, Topsakal V. True keyhole cochlear implant surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103926. [PMID: 37229977 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimal invasive Robotic Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery (RACIS) is a keyhole surgery by definition. It is therefore not possible to visualize the electrode array during insertion in the scala tympani. Hitherto, surgeons visualised the round window via the external auditory canal by folding over the tympanic membrane. However, the opening of a tympanomeatal flap is not minimal invasive and is especially in conventional cochlear implantation surgery not even necessary. Here we prove that image guided and robot assisted surgery can also allow correct electrode array insertion without opening the tympanomeatal flap. AIM The aim is to report the first experience of robotic cochlear implantation surgery fully based on image guided surgery and without the opening of a tympanomeatal flap for electrode array insertion. INTERVENTION RACIS with a straight flexible lateral wall electrode. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Electrode cochlear insertion depth with RACIS and autonomous inner ear access with full electrode insertion of a flexible lateral wall electrode array. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS The audiological outcome in terms of mean hearing thresholds. CONCLUSION After a series of 33 cases and after fine-tuning the insertion angles and yet another new version of planning software to depict the round window approach, a new clinical routine for inserting electrodes fully based on image guided surgery without opening a tympanomeatal flap was developed in robotic-assisted cochlear implant surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaouad Abari
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Emilie Heuninck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mohammad Al Saadi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evaluation of a Less Invasive Cochlear Implant Surgery in OPA1 Mutations Provoking Deafblindness. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:genes14030627. [PMID: 36980899 PMCID: PMC10048538 DOI: 10.3390/genes14030627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation (CI) for deafblindness may have more impact than for non-syndromic hearing loss. Deafblind patients have a double handicap in a society that is more and more empowered by fast communication. CI is a remedy for deafness, but requires revision surgery every 20 to 25 years, and thus placement should be minimally invasive. Furthermore, failed reimplantation surgery will have more impact on a deafblind person. In this context, we assessed the safety of minimally invasive robotically assisted cochlear implant surgery (RACIS) for the first time in a deafblind patient. Standard pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry were performed in a patient with deafblindness as part of this robotic-assisted CI study before and after surgery. This patient, with an optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) (OMIM#165500) mutation consented to RACIS for the second (contralateral) CI. The applicability and safety of RACIS were evaluated as well as her subjective opinion on her disability. RACIS was uneventful with successful surgical and auditory outcomes in this case of deafblindness due to the OPA1 mutation. RACIS appears to be a safe and beneficial intervention to increase communication skills in the cases of deafblindness due to an OPA1 mutation. The use of RACIS use should be widespread in deafblindness as it minimizes surgical trauma and possible failures.
Collapse
|
7
|
Robotic cochlear implantation in post-meningitis ossified cochlea. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103668. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
8
|
Sefein IK, Gaballah MM. Bilateral Anterior Displaced Sigmoid Sinus in Cochlear Implantation: A Proposed Solution. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74:3977-3981. [PMID: 36742471 PMCID: PMC9895743 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02768-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess the safety, time consumption and presumed postoperative complications of posterior repositioning in cases with bilateral anterior displaced sigmoid sinus (ADSS) having cochlear implant surgery. Cases with bilateral ADSS were included. A cortical bone chip was harvested. Sinus plate was drilled thin and removed, ADSS was repositioned posteriorly and secured by the bone chips. The procedure was completed using the standard posterior tympanotomy (PT) technique. Follow up was done both clinically and by computed tomography (CT). Out of 632 cases operated upon in more than 7 years, only 7 cases had Bilateral ADSS (1.1%) of which 5 were females (71.45%). The average age was 8.2 ± 12 (6 children and an adult). No intraoperative bleeding was encountered in any of the 7 cases. The average operative time was 103.6 ± 9.7 min. No minor nor major complications were detected in all 7 cases. To keep the advantages of PT, repositioning of ADSS in bilateral cases can be done safely with a reasonable increase in the average operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihab K. Sefein
- Associate consultant of Otorhinolaryngology At National Hearing and Speech Institute (HSI), General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes (GOTHI), Giza, Egypt
| | - Mohammad M. Gaballah
- Associate consultant of Otorhinolaryngology At National Hearing and Speech Institute (HSI), General Organization for Teaching Hospitals and Institutes (GOTHI), Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sprinzl GM, Magele A. Personalized Medicine in Otolaryngology: Special Topic Otology. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12111820. [PMID: 36579531 PMCID: PMC9697707 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12111820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, more than 1.5 billion people experience some degree of hearing loss [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Mathias Sprinzl
- University Clinic St. Poelten, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Implantable Hearing Devices, Henri Dunant Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-2742-9004-11500
| | - Astrid Magele
- University Clinic St. Poelten, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Dunant-Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Implantable Hearing Devices, Henri Dunant Platz 1, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alhabib SF, Almuhawas F, Hagr A, Alzhrani F, Hamed N, Alenzi S, Abdelsamad Y, Dhanasingh A. Mastoid Growth and the Configuration of Cochlear Implant Electrode Lead. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2022:1455613221106221. [PMID: 35861389 DOI: 10.1177/01455613221106221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study the changes in the coiled configuration of electrode excess lead in the mastoid cavity in the cochlear implant recipients over time. METHODS Post-operative CT scans at two different appointments of fourteen patients with cochlear implants (CI) were retrospectively analyzed using a DICOM viewer software (3D-slicer). Mastoid thickness (MT) was measured in the oblique coronal plane from the round window (RW) entrance to the mastoid edge and inter-cochlear distance (ICD) was measured in the axial plane at the fundus level between two ears. 3D segmentation of the entire inner ear of both sides and coiled electrode excess lead was performed to visually compare the changes in coiled configuration between the two CT scan time points. RESULT MT and ICD increased logarithmically with the patient's age, as has been measured from both the 1st and the 2nd CT scans and a weak linear correlation between MT and ICD was observed. Growth in MT and ICT measured between the time of 1st and 2nd CT scans showed a strong linear correlation. In eight cases, changes in the electrode excess lead have been observed in the 2nd CT scan, either a change in the coiling configuration of electrode excess lead or shifted laterally toward the mastoid edge. The ICD growth between the 1st and the 2nd CT scans was >2 mm in only seven cases and all of them were children. All other six cases had no observed changes in the coiled electrode lead. In addition, the mastoid growth between the 1st and the 2nd CT scan was >2.5 mm in only 4 cases. CONCLUSION Coiled configuration of electrode excess lead could change when the MT and ICD increased over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman F Alhabib
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, ORL Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fida Almuhawas
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, ORL Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, ORL Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Farid Alzhrani
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, ORL Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nezar Hamed
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, ORL Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad Alenzi
- King Fahad specialized Hospital-Tabuk, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Anandhan Dhanasingh
- MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Caversaccio M, Dazert S, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Jablonski GE, Kameswaran M, Kuzovkov V, Leinung M, Li Y, Loth A, Magele A, Mlynski R, Mueller J, Parnes L, Radeloff A, Raine C, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stöver T, Tavora-Viera D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Gavilan J. Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events. Front Surg 2022; 9:823219. [PMID: 35402479 PMCID: PMC8987358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types. Results A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4–6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6–30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2–1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1–1.3%), 11% (9.2–13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5–3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed. Conclusion Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Paul Van de Heyning
| | - Peter Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Institute Australia, Lions Hearing Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Loth
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Magele
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Division of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Research Center of Neurosensory Sciences, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Chris Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Medical Sciences Department of Health Sciences and Medicine. University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland. Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of ENT HNS, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Topsakal V, Heuninck E, Matulic M, Tekin AM, Mertens G, Van Rompaey V, Galeazzi P, Zoka-Assadi M, van de Heyning P. First Study in Men Evaluating a Surgical Robotic Tool Providing Autonomous Inner Ear Access for Cochlear Implantation. Front Neurol 2022; 13:804507. [PMID: 35386404 PMCID: PMC8979022 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.804507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Image-guided and robot-assisted surgeries have found their applications in skullbase surgery. Technological improvements in terms of accuracy also opened new opportunities for robotically-assisted cochlear implantation surgery (RACIS). The HEARO® robotic system is an otological next-generation surgical robot to assist the surgeon. It first provides software-defined spatial boundaries for orientation and reference information to anatomical structures during otological and neurosurgical procedures. Second, it executes a preplanned drill trajectory through the temporal bone. Here, we report how safe the HEARO procedure can provide an autonomous minimally invasive inner ear access and the efficiency of this access to subsequently insert the electrode array during cochlear implantation. In 22 out of 25 included patients, the surgeon was able to complete the HEARO® procedure. The dedicated planning software (OTOPLAN®) allowed the surgeon to reconstruct a three-dimensional representation of all the relevant anatomical structures, designate the target on the cochlea, i.e., the round window, and plan the safest trajectory to reach it. This trajectory accommodated the safety distance to the critical structures while minimizing the insertion angles. A minimal distance of 0.4 and 0.3 mm was planned to facial nerve and chorda tympani, respectively. Intraoperative cone-beam CT supported safe passage for the 22 HEARO® procedures. The intraoperative accuracy analysis reported the following mean errors: 0.182 mm to target, 0.117 mm to facial nerve, and 0.107 mm to chorda tympani. This study demonstrates that microsurgical robotic technology can be used in different anatomical variations, even including a case of inner ear anomalies, with the geometrically correct keyhole to access to the inner ear. Future perspectives in RACIS may focus on improving intraoperative imaging, automated segmentation and trajectory, robotic insertion with controlled speed, and haptic feedback. This study [Experimental Antwerp robotic research otological surgery (EAR2OS) and Antwerp Robotic cochlear implantation (25 refers to 25 cases) (ARCI25)] was registered at clinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03746613 and NCT04102215.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Vedat Topsakal
| | - Emilie Heuninck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Ahmet M. Tekin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Klinikum Bad Salzungen, Bad Salzungen, Germany
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Paul van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mueller F, Hermann J, Weber S, O'Toole Bom Braga G, Topsakal V. Image-Based Planning of Minimally Traumatic Inner Ear Access for Robotic Cochlear Implantation. Front Surg 2021; 8:761217. [PMID: 34901143 PMCID: PMC8655094 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.761217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: During robotic cochlear implantation, an image-guided robotic system provides keyhole access to the scala tympani of the cochlea to allow insertion of the cochlear implant array. To standardize minimally traumatic robotic access to the cochlea, additional hard and soft constraints for inner ear access were proposed during trajectory planning. This extension of the planning strategy aims to provide a trajectory that preserves the anatomical and functional integrity of critical intra-cochlear structures during robotic execution and allows implantation with minimal insertion angles and risk of scala deviation. Methods: The OpenEar dataset consists of a library with eight three-dimensional models of the human temporal bone based on computed tomography and micro-slicing. Soft constraints for inner ear access planning were introduced that aim to minimize the angle of cochlear approach, minimize the risk of scala deviation and maximize the distance to critical intra-cochlear structures such as the osseous spiral lamina. For all cases, a solution space of Pareto-optimal trajectories to the round window was generated. The trajectories satisfy the hard constraints, specifically the anatomical safety margins, and optimize the aforementioned soft constraints. With user-defined priorities, a trajectory was parameterized and analyzed in a virtual surgical procedure. Results: In seven out of eight cases, a solution space was found with the trajectories safely passing through the facial recess. The solution space was Pareto-optimal with respect to the soft constraints of the inner ear access. In one case, the facial recess was too narrow to plan a trajectory that would pass the nerves at a sufficient distance with the intended drill diameter. With the soft constraints introduced, the optimal target region was determined to be in the antero-inferior region of the round window membrane. Conclusion: A trend could be identified that a position between the antero-inferior border and the center of the round window membrane appears to be a favorable target position for cochlear tunnel-based access through the facial recess. The planning concept presented and the results obtained therewith have implications for planning strategies for robotic surgical procedures to the inner ear that aim for minimally traumatic cochlear access and electrode array implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Mueller
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Hermann
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Weber
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jablonski GE, Falkenberg-Jensen B, Bunne M, Iftikhar M, Greisiger R, Opheim LR, Korslund H, Myhrum M, Sørensen TM. Fusion of Technology in Cochlear Implantation Surgery: Investigation of Fluoroscopically Assisted Robotic Electrode Insertion. Front Surg 2021; 8:741401. [PMID: 34820415 PMCID: PMC8606737 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.741401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The HEARO cochlear implantation surgery aims to replace the conventional wide mastoidectomy approach with a minimally invasive direct cochlear access. The main advantage of the HEARO access would be that the trajectory accommodates the optimal and individualized insertion parameters such as type of cochlear access and trajectory angles into the cochlea. To investigate the quality of electrode insertion with the HEARO procedure, the insertion process was inspected under fluoroscopy in 16 human cadaver temporal bones. Prior to the insertion, the robotic middle and inner ear access were performed through the HEARO procedures. The status of the insertion was analyzed on the post-operative image with Siemens Artis Pheno (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). The completion of the full HEARO procedure, including the robotic inner ear access and fluoroscopy electrode insertion, was possible in all 16 cases. It was possible to insert the electrode in all 16 cases through the drilled tunnel. However, one case in which the full cochlea was not visible on the post-operative image for analysis was excluded. The post-operative analysis of the electrode insertion showed an average insertion angle of 507°, which is equivalent to 1.4 turns of the cochlea, and minimal and maximal insertion angles were recorded as 373° (1 cochlear turn) and 645° (1.8 cochlear turn), respectively. The fluoroscopy inspection indicated no sign of complications during the insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marie Bunne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Muneera Iftikhar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ralf Greisiger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leif Runar Opheim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Korslund
- Interventional Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marte Myhrum
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torquil Mcdonald Sørensen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Auinger AB, Dahm V, Liepins R, Riss D, Baumgartner WD, Arnoldner C. Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine. Front Surg 2021; 8:742219. [PMID: 34660683 PMCID: PMC8511493 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.742219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery has been proposed in various surgical fields to reduce recovery time, scarring, and to improve patients' outcomes. Such innovations are ever-growing and have now reached the field of cochlear implantation. To implement robotic ear surgery in routine, it is of interest if preoperative planning of a safe trajectory to the middle ear is possible with clinically available image data. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of robotic cochlear implant surgery in 50 patients (100 ears) scheduled for routine cochlear implant procedures based on clinically available imaging. The primary objective was to assess if available high-resolution computed tomography or cone beam tomography imaging is sufficient for planning a trajectory by an otological software. Secondary objectives were to assess the feasibility of cochlear implant surgery with a drill bit diameter of 1.8 mm, which is the currently used as a standard drill bit. Furthermore, it was evaluated if feasibility of robotic surgery could be increased when using smaller drill bit sizes. Cochlear and trajectory parameters of successfully planned ears were collected. Measurements were carried out by two observers and the interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Under the prerequisite of the available image data being sufficient for the planning of the procedure, up to two thirds of ears were eligible for robotic cochlear implant surgery with the standard drill bit size of 1.8 mm. The main reason for inability to plan the keyhole access was insufficient image resolution causing anatomical landmarks not being accurately identified. Although currently not applicable in robotic cochlear implantation, narrower drill bit sizes ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 mm in diameter could increase feasibility up to 100%. The interrater agreement between the two observers was good for this data set. Discussion: For robotic cochlear implant surgery, imaging with sufficient resolution is essential for preoperative assessment. A slice thickness of <0.3 mm is necessary for trajectory planning. This can be achieved by using digital volume tomography while radiation exposure can be kept to a minimum. Furthermore, surgeons who use the software tool, should be trained on a regular basis in order to achieve planning consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Barbara Auinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Valerie Dahm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rudolfs Liepins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominik Riss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Arnoldner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hafeez N, Du X, Boulgouris N, Begg P, Irving R, Coulson C, Tourrel G. Electrical impedance guides electrode array in cochlear implantation using machine learning and robotic feeder. Hear Res 2021; 412:108371. [PMID: 34689069 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear Implant provides an electronic substitute for hearing to severely or profoundly deaf patients. However, postoperative hearing outcomes significantly depend on the proper placement of electrode array (EA) into scala tympani (ST) during cochlear implant surgery. Due to limited intra-operative methods to access array placement, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between EA complex impedance and different insertion trajectories in a plastic ST model. A prototype system was designed to measure bipolar complex impedance (magnitude and phase) and its resistive and reactive components of electrodes. A 3-DoF actuation system was used as an insertion feeder. 137 insertions were performed from 3 different directions at a speed of 0.08 mm/s. Complex impedance data of 8 electrode pairs were sequentially recorded in each experiment. Machine learning algorithms were employed to classify both the full and partial insertion lengths. Support Vector Machine (SVM) gave the highest 97.1% accuracy for full insertion. When a real-time prediction was tested, Shallow Neural Network (SNN) model performed better than other algorithms using partial insertion data. The highest accuracy was found at 86.1% when 4 time samples and 2 apical electrode pairs were used. Direction prediction using partial data has the potential of online control of the insertion feeder for better EA placement. Accessing the position of the electrode array during the insertion has the potential to optimize its intraoperative placement that will result in improved hearing outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauman Hafeez
- Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK.
| | - Xinli Du
- Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Nikolaos Boulgouris
- Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Philip Begg
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Richard Irving
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Chris Coulson
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shim T, Zalzal H, Kumar N, Tercyak S, Whitehead MT, Reilly B, Preciado D. Round window anatomy predicts ease of cochlear implantation in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 149:110852. [PMID: 34311167 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aim to evaluate the utility of the Round Window Angle (RWA) as a predictor of difficulty and operative time in cochlear implantation. METHODS A retrospective study of pediatric patients that underwent cochlear implantation and CT temporal bone imaging from January 2008 to November 2019. Correlation, univariate, and multivariate analysis were conducted. RESULTS 347 implantations met inclusion criteria. We found a difference in RWA for difficult (median: 101°, n = 5) and non-difficult (median: 74, n = 317) implantations (p < 0.0001). There was also a difference in RWA in patients with round windows visualized intra-operatively (p < 0.0197). When controlling for age and intraoperative round window visualization, logistic regression showed RWA was significantly associated with difficult insertion (OR: 1.687; p = 0.0246). Further, there was positive correlation between RWA and operative time (r = 0.1779, p = 0.0013) with patients with acute RWAs having shorter operative times (mean 115.7 ± 32.1 min) than those with obtuse RWA (mean 183.5 ± 97.0 min) (p = 0.0035). When accounting for surgeon and patient age, multivariate linear regression showed round window visualization (β = 3.456, p = 0.0006) and obtuse RWA (β = 6.172, p < 0.0001) was associated with an increase in operative time. CONCLUSION Further research is needed to identify difficult cochlear implantations to increase the success and reduce risks associated with the surgery. Our study reports the possibility that an obtuse RWA both significantly increases difficulty and time of operation due to decreased round window visualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Shim
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Habib Zalzal
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Nankee Kumar
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Samuel Tercyak
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Matthew T Whitehead
- Division of Pediatric Radiology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brian Reilly
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Diego Preciado
- Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Riojas KE, Tran ET, Freeman MH, Noble JH, Webster RJ, Labadie RF. Clinical Translation of an Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Surgery. J Med Device 2021; 15:031001. [PMID: 33995757 PMCID: PMC8086187 DOI: 10.1115/1.4050203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to describe the development of a minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery (MICIS) electrode array insertion tool concept to enable clinical translation. First, analysis of the geometric parameters of potential MICIS patients (N = 97) was performed to inform tool design, inform MICIS phantom model design, and provide further insight into MICIS candidacy. Design changes were made to the insertion tool based on clinical requirements and parameter analysis results. A MICIS phantom testing model was built to evaluate insertion force profiles in a clinically realistic manner, and the new tool design was evaluated in the model and in cadavers to test clinical viability. Finally, after regulatory approval, the tool was used for the first time in a clinical case. Results of this work included first, in the parameter analysis, approximately 20% of the population was not considered viable MICIS candidates. Additionally, one 3D printed tool could accommodate all viable candidates with polyimide sheath length adjustments accounting for interpatient variation. The insertion tool design was miniaturized out of clinical necessity and a disassembly method, necessary for removal around the cochlear implant, was developed and tested. Phantom model testing revealed that the force profile of the insertion tool was similar to that of traditional forceps insertion. Cadaver testing demonstrated that all clinical requirements (including complete disassembly) were achieved with the tool, and the new tool enabled 15% deeper insertions compared to the forceps approach. Finally, and most importantly, the tool helped achieve a full insertion in its first MICIS clinical case. In conclusion, the new insertion tool provides a clinically viable solution to one of the most difficult aspects of MICIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E. Riojas
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
| | - Emily T. Tran
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104
| | - Michael H. Freeman
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232
| | - Jack H. Noble
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
| | - Robert J. Webster
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
| | - Robert F. Labadie
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Riepl R, Greve J, Schild LR, Böhm F, Goldberg-Bockhorn E, Hoffmann TK, Schuler PJ. Application of a new computer-assisted robotic visualization system in cochlear implantation-Proof of concept. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2301. [PMID: 34111318 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last decades conventional cochlear implant (CI) surgery has remained essentially unchanged. Nevertheless, alternative implantation techniques to further improve patient outcomes such as endaural implantation or robot-assisted surgery have been proposed in recent years. However, none of these have gained acceptance in clinical routine, thus confirming a demand for new developments. METHODS Cochlear implant surgery was performed in two mastoid bones obtained from body donors using a novel hands-free exoscope. Advantages and disadvantages of the system were evaluated. RESULTS In all cases, implantation of the electrode was feasible. The system allowed for hands-free movement and adjustment of the exoscope by the head-mounted display. Network connectivity of the system leaves room for improvement. CONCLUSION The RoboticScope is an innovative tool and can be used supportively in conventional CI surgery in the experimental setting. Although operating the device requires a certain learning curve, the usability is intuitive for every ear surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Riepl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Jens Greve
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Leon R Schild
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Felix Böhm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Eva Goldberg-Bockhorn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thomas K Hoffmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| | - Patrick J Schuler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.,Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tekin AM, Matulic M, Wuyts W, Assadi MZ, Mertens G, van Rompaey V, Li Y, van de Heyning P, Topsakal V. A New Pathogenic Variant in POU3F4 Causing Deafness Due to an Incomplete Partition of the Cochlea Paved the Way for Innovative Surgery. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12050613. [PMID: 33919129 PMCID: PMC8143104 DOI: 10.3390/genes12050613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Incomplete partition type III (IP-III) is a relatively rare inner ear malformation that has been associated with a POU3F4 gene mutation. The IP-III anomaly is mainly characterized by incomplete separation of the modiolus of the cochlea from the internal auditory canal. We describe a 71-year-old woman with profound sensorineural hearing loss diagnosed with an IP-III of the cochlea that underwent cochlear implantation. Via targeted sequencing with a non-syndromic gene panel, we identified a heterozygous c.934G > C p. (Ala31Pro) pathogenic variant in the POU3F4 gene that has not been reported previously. IP-III of the cochlea is challenging for cochlear implant surgery for two main reasons: liquor cerebrospinalis gusher and electrode misplacement. Surgically, it may be better to opt for a shorter array because it is less likely for misplacement with the electrode in a false route. Secondly, the surgeon has to consider the insertion angles of cochlear access very strictly to avoid misplacement along the inner ear canal. Genetic results in well describes genotype-phenotype correlations are a strong clinical tool and as in this case guided surgical planning and robotic execution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet M. Tekin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brussels Health Campus, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (A.M.T.); (M.M.)
| | - Marco Matulic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brussels Health Campus, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (A.M.T.); (M.M.)
| | - Wim Wuyts
- Center of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium;
| | | | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (G.M.); (V.v.R.); (P.v.d.H.)
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (G.M.); (V.v.R.); (P.v.d.H.)
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China;
| | - Paul van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium; (G.M.); (V.v.R.); (P.v.d.H.)
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Brussels Health Campus, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (A.M.T.); (M.M.)
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Brussels Health Campus, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-24776882; Fax: +32-24776880
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abrar R, Mawman D, Martinez de Estibariz U, Datta D, Stapleton E. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia in a visually impaired adult with profound sensorineural deafness: A case report. Cochlear Implants Int 2020; 22:176-181. [PMID: 33272141 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1851498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommends that adult patients with severe to profound deafness are eligible for simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation if they are blind or have other disabilities increasing their reliance on auditory stimuli. Cochlear implant (CI) surgery is routinely performed under general anaesthesia (GA), precluding patients who have higher risk associated with GA. Recent literature describes the safety and efficacy of performing unilateral CI surgery under local anaesthesia (LA). We report the first simultaneous bilateral CI under LA in the UK in an adult patient with profound sensorineural deafness and visual impairment.Case study: A 46-year-old gentleman, registered blind, presented with a 20-year history of bilateral progressive hearing loss. He was assessed as unfit for surgery under GA due to significant cardiac comorbidities. We performed simultaneous bilateral CI surgery under LA on the patient; he was discharged home the following day. Postoperative free field audiometry showed a significant improvement; speech discrimination using Bamford, Kowal and Bench sentences presented in quiet, increased from 0% pre-operatively to 100% four months post-operatively.Conclusion: Simultaneous bilateral CI surgery under LA is a safe and feasible procedure for eligible patients who may otherwise have been denied surgery due to their GA risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohma Abrar
- The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Deborah Mawman
- The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Unai Martinez de Estibariz
- The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Devjay Datta
- Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma Stapleton
- The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|