Lemborexant, A Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist (DORA) for the Treatment of Insomnia Disorder: Results From a Bayesian, Adaptive, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PARP Inhibitor for Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety

Poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) is approved for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutation. In recent years, many studies have explored the application of PARPi in neoadjuvant therapy, but failed to reach a unified conclusion. PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and key oncological meetings for trials were searched for studies reporting neoadjuvant regimens with PARPi in HER2-negative breast cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR), residual cancer burden (RCB), breast-conservation surgery rate (BCSR), clinical response, and adverse events were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis using the Mantel Haenszel random/fixed effects model. Subgroup analyses of pCR were conducted according to BRCA1/2 status, and hormone receptor (HR) status. Five studies (N = 1223) were included, the addition of PARPi to neoadjuvant regimens significantly increased pCR rates (HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.09-1.92, P = .01, I2 = 86%). In subgroup analysis, the addition of PARPi increased the pCR rate both in HR-positive (n = 383) and HR-negative (n = 431) subgroups, which showed a dominant effect of PARPi regardless of HR status (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.33-3.23, P = .001, I2 = 0%; HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.39-2.26, P < .0001, I2 = 0%, respectively). However, when we performed a subgroup analysis based on the status of BRCA1/2, no further benefit for PARPi was found. Adverse reactions were generally tolerable. Other outcome indexes, including RCB, clinical response, BCSR, and PARPi did not show a clinical benefit. Regardless of BRCA1/2 status, PARPi in neoadjuvant therapy, can improve the pCR rate of HER2-negative breast cancer, especially in HR-positive patients. Thus, we should have performed larger randomized trials and provided a stronger evidence-based basis.

Assessing the Real-World, Long-Term Impact of Lemborexant on Sleep Quality in a Home-Based Clinical Study

Purpose

Both subjective and objective evaluations are essential for the treatment of insomnia. Lemborexant has been shown to be effective in the long-term based solely on a subjective basis, and no long-term objective measures have been evaluated under natural sleep conditions. Small, lightweight sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) monitor was used, instead of polysomnography, to objectively evaluate sleep at home 4 and 12 weeks after lemborexant treatment.

Patients and Methods

Adults and elderly subjects with insomnia disorder, per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm, single-center trial. Objective and subjective measures of sleep were prospectively assessed. Sleep disturbance, excessive sleepiness, and depressive symptoms were assessed using questionnaires.

Results

A total of 45 subjects were screened, of which 33 were enrolled. Paired t-tests were conducted to evaluate changes in sleep variables and compared with the baseline; subjects showed significant improvements in objective sleep efficiency (SE) and subjective sleep parameters at weeks 4 and 12 following treatment with lemborexant. When baseline values were taken into account, a repeated-multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed statistically significant changes in the objective measures. Sleep disturbance, excessive sleepiness, and depressive symptoms improved after three months of lemborexant treatment.

Conclusion

Furthermore, lemborexant therapy improved nocturnal sleep, when measured objectively using sleep EEG monitoring at home, and improved daytime sleepiness and depressive symptoms in older adults with insomnia disorder.

An orexin-receptor-2-mediated heart-brain axis in cardiac pain

Orexin is a neuropeptide released from hypothalamus regulating feeding, sleeping, arousal, and cardiovascular activity. Past research has demonstrated that orexin receptor 2 (OX2R) agonist infusion in the brain results in sympathoexcitatory responses. Here, we found that epicardial administration of OX2R agonism leads to opposite responses. We proved that OX2R is expressed mainly in DRG neurons and transported to sensory nerve endings innervating the heart. In a capsaicin-induced cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex (CSAR) model, we recorded the calcium influx in DRG neurons, measured heart rate variability, and examined the PVN c-Fos activity to prove that epicardial OX2R agonism administration could attenuate capsaicin-induced CSAR. We further showed that OX2R agonism could partially rescue acute myocardial infarction by reducing sympathetic overactivation. Our data indicate that epicardial application of OX2R agonist exerts a cardioprotective effect by attenuating CSAR. This OX2R-mediated heart-brain axis may provide therapeutic targets for acute cardiovascular diseases.

A Comprehensive Review of Lemborexant to Treat Insomnia

Purpose of Review

This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding Lemborexant for the treatment of insomnia. It covers the background and management of insomnia and then reviews the body of existing evidence evaluating the use of Lemborexant for this purpose.

Recent Findings

Insomnia leads to significant decreased in quality of life and economic burden due to decreased workplace performance and increased health care costs. Insomnia manifests as a single common pathway of hyperarousal due to a highly complex network of interactions between activation of the sympathetic system and the endocrine system. Lemborexant is a dual orexin 1/2 antagonist that blocks cortical arousal and promotes sleep state transition. Lemborexant was approved by the FDA in 2019 for use in insomnia. It belongs to a class of orexin neuropeptide inhibitors that is growing in popular clinical application.

Summary

Insomnia is a crippling disorder of the sleep wake cycle that drives significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. It carries a high societal and economic toll due to direct and indirect effects to the healthcare system. Lemborexant is a new addition to the orexin antagonist class of drugs that already includes Almorexant and Suvorexant that has superior pharmacokinetic properties. While Lemborexant does have a mild side effect profile, its clinical safety and efficacy make it a promising insomnia drug of the future.

Clinical safety and narcolepsy-like symptoms of dual orexin receptor antagonists in patients with insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are emerging treatments for insomnia. This meta-analysis study aimed to assess the safety of FDA-approved DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant), focusing on narcolepsy-like symptoms associated with these drugs.

METHODS

Five prominent databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. Primary safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), sleep paralysis, and hallucinations were categorized as adverse events (AEs)-related narcolepsy-like symptoms.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs with 7703 patients were included. DORAs were associated with a higher risk of TEAEs (risk ratio [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.15) and treatment-related TEAEs (RR, 1.69; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.92) when compared to placebo. The DORA group exhibited a significantly higher risk of EDS (RR, 2.15; 95% CI: 1.02 to 4.52) and sleep paralysis (RR, 3.40; 95% CI: 1.18 to 9.80) compared to the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis achieved a comparative evaluation of the clinical safety and tolerability of FDA-approved DORAs for primary insomnia, specifically focusing on AEs-related narcolepsy-like symptoms. This study contributes to understanding the safety profile of FDA-approved DORAs for treating insomnia.

Improvement of sleep and pain with lemborexant administration in patients with chronic pain: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic pain often have sleep disturbances, and many patients receive sleep medications in addition to analgesics. Although there have been scattered reports of negative pain-sleep interactions, only a few reports have investigated the efficacy of sleep medication interventions in patients with chronic pain for improving sleep disturbances and reducing pain. We retrospectively examined whether lemborexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, is effective in improving sleep disturbances and reducing pain in patients with chronic pain. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital.

METHODS

The subjects were 26 patients with chronic pain undergoing treatment at our pain clinic between July 2021 and March 2022, who had been diagnosed with insomnia, with an Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) score of ≥6 and had been started on lemborexant. The AIS score and pain score (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) before and after 2 and 4 weeks of starting lemborexant were investigated.

RESULTS

Patients who were already taking other sleep medications, such as benzodiazepines were switched to 5 mg of lemborexant after all the other sleep medications were discontinued. Those who had not yet used sleeping pills were started on 5 mg of lemborexant. During the study course, the dose of lemborexant was adjusted at the discretion of the attending physician, based on improvement of insomnia symptoms and secondary symptoms, such as daytime sleepiness and lightheadedness. The study finally included 21 patients, excluding 5 who could not continue taking lemborexant due to side effects, such as lightheadedness. The AIS scores significantly improved, decreasing from baseline (mean ± standard deviation: 12.5 ± 4.9) to 2 weeks (7.8 ± 3.1) and 4 weeks (5.3 ± 2.9) after the start of lemborexant. No significant difference was observed in the degree of improvement in sleep disturbance between patients with or without previous sleep medications, and there was also no statistically significant improvement in the NRS score before (6.1 ± 2.7) and after 2 weeks (5.5 ± 2.3) and 4 weeks (5.9 ± 2.2) from treatment initiation.

Pyrazole derivatives as selective orexin-2 receptor antagonists (2-SORA): synthesis, structure-activity-relationship, and sleep-promoting properties in rats

Selective orexin 2 receptor antagonists (2-SORA) such as seltorexant (15) are in clinical development for the treatment of insomnia and other conditions such as depression. Herein, we report our structure-activity-relationship (SAR) optimization efforts starting from an HTS hit (1) (N-(1-((5-acetylfuran-2-yl)methyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-5-(m-tolyl)oxazole-4-carboxamide) that was derived from an unrelated in-house GPCR-agonist program. Medicinal chemistry efforts focused on the optimization of orexin 2 receptor (OX2R) antagonistic activity, stability in liver microsomes, time dependent CYP3A4 inhibition, and aqueous solubility. Compounds were assessed for their brain-penetrating potential in in vivo experiments to select the most promising compounds for our in vivo sleep model. Our lead optimization efforts led to the discovery of the potent, brain penetrating and orally active, 2-SORA (N-(1-(2-(5-methoxy-1H-pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridin-3-yl)ethyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-5-(m-tolyl)oxazole-4-carboxamide) 43 with efficacy in a sleep model in rats comparable to 15.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of respiratory safety of lemborexant in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the respiratory safety of lemborexant among adults and older adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

E2006-A001-113 (Study 113; NCT04647383) was a double-blind, two-period crossover, placebo-controlled study in adults (ages ≥ 45 to ≤ 90 years, n = 33) with moderate (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] score ≥ 15 to < 30 events/h, n = 13) or severe (AHI ≥ 30 events/h, n = 20) OSA. Participants were randomized to lemborexant 10 mg (LEM10) or placebo (PBO) for two treatment periods of 8 nights with a ≥ 14-day washout period. AHI and peripheral oxygen saturation were evaluated after treatment on Day 1 (after a single dose) and Day 8 (after multiple doses).

RESULTS

No significant differences in AHI were observed after single and multiple doses of LEM10 compared with PBO in participants with moderate to severe OSA (least-squares mean: single-dose LEM10, 41.7; PBO, 44.8; multiple-dose LEM10, 44.9; PBO, 45.7). In addition, there were no significant differences between treatments in peripheral oxygen saturation (least-squares mean: single-dose LEM10, 93.0; PBO, 93.1; multiple-dose LEM10, 93.1; PBO, 93.4). Further, there were no significant differences between treatments in percentage of total sleep time with peripheral oxygen saturation < 90%, < 85%, or < 80%. No significant differences were observed between treatments when AHI and peripheral oxygen saturation outcomes were analyzed by OSA severity. Altogether, 6/33 (18.2%) participants receiving LEM10, vs 3/33 (9.1%) PBO, reported treatment-emergent adverse events, mostly mild in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

LEM10 demonstrated respiratory safety and was well tolerated with single-dose and multiple-dose administration in participants with moderate to severe OSA. This suggests that LEM may be a treatment option for patients with OSA and comorbid insomnia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A Study to Evaluate the Respiratory Safety of Lemborexant in Adult and Elderly Participants With Moderate to Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea and in Adult and Elderly Participants With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04647383; Identifier: NCT04647383.

CITATION

Cheng JY, Lorch D, Lowe AD, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of respiratory safety of lemborexant in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(1):57-65.

Effects of new hypnotic drugs on cognition: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Insomnia is a common disease, and the application of various types of sleeping pills for cognitive impairment is controversial, especially as different doses can lead to different effects. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the cognitive impairment caused by different sleeping pills to provide a theoretical basis for guiding clinicians in the selection of medication regimens.

Objective

To evaluate whether various different doses (low, medium and high) of anti-insomnia drugs, such as the dual-orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), zopiclone, eszopiclone and zolpidem, induce cognitive impairment.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to September 20th, 2022 for keywords in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, zopiclone and zolpidem on sleep and cognitive function. The primary outcomes were indicators related to cognitive characteristics, including scores on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and daytime alertness. The secondary outcomes were the indicators associated with sleep and adverse events. Continuous variables were expressed as the standard mean difference (SMD). Data were obtained through GetData 2.26 and analyzed by Stata v.15.0.

Results

A total of 8702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Eszopiclonehigh significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 3.00, 95 % CI: 1.86 to 4.13) compared with the placebo, and eszopiclonehigh significantly increased the daytime alertness score (SMD = 4.21, 95 % CI: 1.65 to 6.77; SMD = 3.95, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 6.51; SMD = 3.26, 95 % CI: 0.38 to 6.15; and SMD = 3.23, 95 % CI: 0.34 to 6.11) compared with zolpidemlow, zolpidemhigh, DORAlow, and eszopiclonemid, respectively. Compared with the placebo, zopiclone, zolpidemmid, and eszopiclonehigh, DORA significantly increased the TST (SMD = 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.11 to 3.67; SMD = 6.00, 95 % CI: 2.73 to 9.27; SMD = 1.89, 95 % CI: 0.90 to 2.88; and SMD = 1.70, 95 % CI: 0.42 to 2.99, respectively).

Conclusion

We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it was highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem had a more pronounced effect on sleep maintenance, this drug is better for short-term use. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep, but their cognitive effects have yet to be verified.

The orexin story and orexin receptor antagonists for the treatment of insomnia

Insomnia is present in up to one third of the adult population worldwide, and it can present independently or with other medical conditions such as mental, metabolic, or cardiovascular diseases, which highlights the importance of treating this multifaceted disorder. Insomnia is associated with an abnormal state of hyperarousal (increased somatic, cognitive, and cortical activation) and orexin has been identified as a key promotor of arousal and vigilance. The current standards of care for the treatment of insomnia recommend non-pharmacological interventions (cognitive behavioural therapy) as first-line treatment and, if behavioural interventions are not effective or available, pharmacotherapy. In contrast to most sleep medications used for decades (benzodiazepines and 'Z-drugs'), the new orexin receptor antagonists do not modulate the activity of γ-aminobutyric acid receptors, the main inhibitory mechanism of the central nervous system. Instead, they temporarily block the orexin pathway, causing a different pattern of effects, e.g., less morning or next-day effects, motor dyscoordination, and cognitive impairment. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs are the basis of the different characteristics explained in the package inserts, including the recommended starting dose. Orexin receptor antagonists seem to be devoid of any dependence and tolerance-inducing effects, rendering them a viable option for longer-term treatment. Safety studies did not show exacerbation of existing respiratory problems, but more real-world safety and pharmacovigilance experience is needed. This review provides an overview of the orexin history, the mechanism of action, the relation to insomnia, and key features of available drugs mediating orexin signalling.

Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in midlife women with insomnia disorder

OBJECTIVE

Insomnia is common in midlife women. The efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a competitive dual orexin receptor antagonist, was assessed for 12 months in a subgroup of midlife women (age, 40-58 y) from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; SUNRISE-2).

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled (first 6 mo) study of adults with insomnia disorder ( N = 949). During treatment period 1 (TP1), participants received PBO or LEM 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10). During TP2 (second 6 mo), LEM participants continued their assigned dose; PBO participants were rerandomized to LEM5 or LEM10. Assessments included patient-reported sleep- and fatigue-related measures and treatment-emergent adverse events.

RESULTS

The midlife female subgroup comprised 280 of 949 participants (TP1: PBO, n = 90 of 318 [28.3%]; LEM5, n = 82 of 316 [25.9%]; LEM10, n = 108 of 315 [34.3%]). At 6 months, median changes from baseline in subjective sleep-onset latency (in minutes) were -17.9, -20.7, and - 30.4 for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5, P = not significant; LEM10, P = 0.0310). At 6 months, mean changes from baseline in subjective wake after sleep onset (in minutes) were -37.0 (59.6), -50.1 (74.5), and -54.5 (65.4) for PBO, LEM5, and LEM10 (vs PBO: LEM5 and LEM10, P = not significant), with benefits sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases from baseline (improvement) in Insomnia Severity Index total score and Fatigue Severity Scale total score were seen with LEM versus PBO at 6 months; benefits continued through 12 months. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the total population, subjective sleep parameters improved, and improvement was sustained over time in midlife women. LEM was well tolerated, suggesting that LEM may be a potential treatment option for midlife women with insomnia.

The Underlying Mechanisms of Sleep Deprivation Exacerbating Neuropathic Pain

Pain disrupts sleep, and sleep deprivation or interference can alter pain perception in animals and humans, for example by increasing sensitivity to pain. However, the mechanism by which sleep affects neuropathic pain remains unclear. In this review, we discuss the available evidence from the epidemiologic, clinical, and human, as well as laboratory studies. In previous studies, we have found that sleep deprivation affects various injurious systems, including opioids, dopaminergic, immune, orexins, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and adenosine. At the same time, these systems play a crucial role in neuropathic pain regulation. In the complex interactions between these neurobiological systems, there may be potential regulatory pathways through which sleep deprivation amplifies neuropathic pain. Because of the impact sleep problems and neuropathic pain can have on the patients' quality of life, studying the link between sleep and neuropathic pain is important for neuropathic pain prevention and public health.

Different doses of dual orexin receptor antagonists in primary insomnia: a Bayesian network analysis

Background: Systematic comparisons of the doses of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) for people with insomnia are limited. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials. gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before 31 October 2022. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. Results: We pooled 7257 participants from 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Moderate to high certainty evidence demonstrated suvorexant (20 and 40 mg) and daridorexant (10 and 50 mg) as the most effective in latency to persistent sleep (LPS) reduction. Lemborexant at 5 and 10 mg was the most effective in subjective sleep onset time (sTSO) reduction. For wake time after sleep onset (WASO), all drugs except daridorexant 5 mg were more effective than placebo. Lemborexant 5 mg was among the best in subjective WASO (sWASO) (moderate to high certainty) and had the highest surface under the curve ranking area (SUCRA) values for sWASO (100%). For total sleep time (TST), suvorexant and daridorexant, except the respective minimum doses, were more effective than placebo, while suvorexant 40 mg and lemborexant 10 mg may have been the most effective for subjective TST (sTST) (low to very low certainty). Suvorexant 40 mg (RR 1.09), suvorexant 80 mg (RR 1.65), and daridorexant 25 mg (RR 1.16) showed a higher safety risk than placebo. Conclusion: Suvorexant 20 mg, lemborexant 5 mg, lemborexant 10 mg, and daridorexant 50 mg represent suitable approaches for insomnia. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, PROSPERO (CRD42022362655).

Exposure-Response Analyses of Polysomnography and Subjective Sleep Efficacy End Points From the Phase 3 Trials of Lemborexant, a Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Insomnia

This report describes polysomnography and sleep diary exposure-response analyses from Study E2006-G000-304 (Study 304), a 1-month trial of 5- or 10-mg lemborexant, zolpidem, or placebo; and Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303), a 6-month trial of 5- or 10-mg lemborexant or placebo. Studies 304 and 303 included 1006 (86%) and 956 (68%) (female) participants, respectively; >40% were ≥65 years, with individual lemborexant exposures derived from a previously described pharmacokinetic model. Linear mixed-effects analyses of polysomnography: latency to persistent sleep (LPS), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) quantified the change from baseline given lemborexant exposure, time, and covariates, guided by consensus recommendations regarding clinical significance. A small impact of sex, body weight, and race was predicted for LPS and SE, irrespective of treatment. Effect of age on LPS was small; baseline SE was estimated to be 8% higher for a 50-year-old versus an 80-year-old, decreasing to 6% by 1 month. Baseline WASO was 13 minutes longer for Black versus White subjects, corresponding to a 5-minute lower change from baseline at the end of the study. For subjective end points, the statistically significant covariate effects for age, sex, and race were not deemed therapeutically relevant, likely reflecting physiologic sleep pattern changes across age and study subgroups. Both polysomnography and subjective analyses indicated clinically meaningful differences from baseline for both lemborexant treatments, with effects being greater for 10-mg versus 5-mg lemborexant, while indicating that covariate-specific lemborexant dose adjustments are not warranted.

The abuse potential of lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act

RATIONALE

Lemborexant (LEM) is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) approved in multiple countries including the USA, Japan, Canada, Australia, and several Asian countries for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As a compound with central nervous system activity, it is important to understand the abuse potential of LEM with respect to public health.

OBJECTIVES

This review discusses data for LEM relevant to each of the 8 factors of the United States Controlled Substances Act.

RESULTS

LEM did not demonstrate abuse potential in nonclinical testing and was associated with a low incidence of abuse-related adverse events in clinical study participants with insomnia disorder. Similar to other DORAs that have been evaluated (eg., almorexant, suvorexant (SUV), and daridorexant), LEM and the positive controls (zolpidem and SUV) also showed drug liking in a phase 1 abuse potential study that enrolled subjects who used sedatives recreationally. However, internet surveillance of SUV and the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System suggests that drugs in the DORA class display very low abuse-related risks in the community. Additionally, as described in FDA-approved labeling, it does not carry physical dependence and withdrawal risks.

CONCLUSIONS

LEM, similar to most other prescription insomnia medications, was placed into Schedule IV. However, LEM and other drugs in the DORA class may have a lower potential for abuse as suggested by real-world postmarketing data from federal surveys and internet surveillance, and thus may have lower risks to public health than Schedule IV benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics that potentiate GABA signaling.

Evaluation of the delirium preventive effect of dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) in critically ill adult patients requiring ventilation with tracheal intubation at an advanced emergency center: A single-center, retrospective, observational study

OBJECTIVE

ICU delirium reportedly contributes to increased mortality attributed to underlying diseases, long-term cognitive decline, and increased healthcare costs. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), suvorexant and lemborexant, have been suggested for preventing ICU delirium. Although ventilator management is a risk factor for delirium, no study has examined the efficacy of suvorexant and lemborexant in preventing delirium in critically ill patients requiring ventilation. Thus, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of DORA in preventing delirium in critically ill adult patients requiring ventilatory management in the emergency room.

METHOD

This retrospective study included patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the emergency room and received ventilator support between January 2015 and April 2022. The HR (95% CI) for delirium development in patients taking DORA was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, which was adjusted for the patient background and concomitant medications. HRs were calculated for patients taking suvorexant and those taking lemborexant using a stratified analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 297 patients included in the study, 67 were in the DORA group; 50 were on suvorexant and 17 were on lemborexant. The DORA group had a lower incidence of delirium than the control group (p < 0.0001). The risk of delirium was lower in the DORA group compared the control group (HR, 0.22; 95% CI 0.12-0.40).The risk of developing delirium was lower with suvorexant (HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.41) and lemborexant (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.81).

CONCLUSION

DORA is a promising drug that could have the potential to prevent delirium, and its efficacy in preventing delirium should be tested in randomized controlled trials in the future.

Wake Up America: National Survey of Patients’ and Physicians’ Views and Attitudes on Insomnia Care

While both patients and physicians consider sleep to be important, sleep health may not receive appropriate consideration during patient visits with health care professionals (HCPs). We completed the first large-scale survey of people with trouble sleeping (PWTS) and physicians who treat insomnia to understand their perspectives and potential discrepancies between them. The Harris Poll conducted online surveys of adult PWTS and HCPs (primary care physicians [PCPs] and psychiatrists) in the United States from September to October 2021. Respondents included 1001 PWTS, 300 PCPs, and 152 psychiatrists. Most HCPs agreed that sleep is critical to good health, yet very few reported routinely conducting full sleep histories on their patients. Approximately 30% of PWTS reported that their PCP never asks about sleep; zero HCPs in this survey reported “never” inquiring. Few HCPs reported being “very satisfied” with current treatment options; 50% of PCPs reported their patients being satisfied. Two-thirds of PWTS did not believe current treatment options adequately improved their sleep. This survey provides evidence that both PWTS and physicians agreed on the importance of sleep, but that treatment is often perceived as ineffective. This survey identifies a need for HCPs to address insomnia management and treatment gaps.

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Insomnia Drugs: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of 153 Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological treatment is common in practice and widely used for the management of insomnia. However, evidence comparing the relative effectiveness, safety, and certainty of evidence among drug classes and individual drugs for insomnia are still lacking. This study aimed to determine the relative effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of drugs for insomnia.

METHODS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to January 10, 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared insomnia drugs with placebo or an active comparator in adults with insomnia. We conducted random-effects frequentist network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty, categorize interventionsand present the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 148 articles met our eligibility criteria; these included 153 trials which enrolled 46,412 participants and assessed 36 individual drugs from eight drug classes. Compared with placebo, both subjectively and objectively measured total sleep time were significantly improved with non-benzodiazepine (subjective: mean difference [MD] 25.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.49-34.64, low certainty; objective: MD 22.34, 95% CI 7.64-37.05, high certainty), antidepressants (subjective: MD 54.40, 95% CI 34.96-75.83, low certainty; objective: MD 35.64, 95% CI 13.05-58.24, high certainty), and orexin receptor antagonists (subjective: MD 21.62, 95% CI 0.84-42.40, high certainty; objective: MD 31.81, 95% CI 2.66-60.95, high certainty); of which doxepin, almorexant, suvorexant, and lemborexant were among the relatively effective drugs with relatively good tolerability and lower risks of any adverse events (AEs). Both subjectively and objectively measured sleep onset latency were significantly shortened with non-benzodiazepines (subjective: MD - 10.12, 95% CI - 13.84 to - 6.40, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 12.11, 95% CI - 19.31 to - 4.90, moderate certainty) and melatonin receptor agonists (subjective: MD - 7.73, 95% CI - 15.21 to - 0.26, high certainty; objective: MD - 7.04, 95% CI - 12.12 to - 1.95, moderate certainty); in particular, zopiclone was among the most effective drugs with a lower risk of any AEs but worse tolerability. Non-benzodiazepines could significantly decrease both subjective and objective measured wake time after sleep onset (subjective: MD - 16.67, 95% CI - 21.79 to - 11.56, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 13.92, 95% CI - 22.71 to - 5.14, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-benzodiazepines probably improve total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and wake time after sleep onset. Other insomnia drug classes and individual drugs also showed potential benefits in improving insomnia symptoms. However, the choice of insomnia drugs should be based on the phenotype of insomnia presented, as well as each drug's safety and tolerability. Protocol registration PROSPERO (CRD42019138790).

Common Sleep Disorders Affecting Older Adults

Sleep disorders in older adults increase with aging, likely due to increased sleep latency, decreased sleep efficiency, and total sleep time. Common sleep issues include chronic insomnia, circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders, sleep-related movement disorders, and sleep-disordered breathing. Diagnostic tools, such as a comprehensive sleep history and questionnaires, or a sleep log for more specific complaints, are commonly used. Polysomnography is not recommended as a routine test; however, it can be used for abnormal behaviors during sleep or if treatment fails. Sleep disorder management is based on the etiology and may include nonpharmacological and pharmacological alternative treatments. For example, nonpharmacological management for chronic insomnia and some sleep disorders may consist of cognitive behavioral therapy, sleep hygiene education, relaxation therapy, sleep restriction, light therapy, and stimulus control therapy. Because the quality of evidence for pharmacological treatment is poor, the medication choice should be based on shared decision-making between the practitioner and the patient, with limited prescription.

Daridorexant for the treatment of insomnia disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Daridorexant is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist that has shown efficacy as a treatment for insomnia in multiple randomized clinical trials. However, the efficacy and safety of daridorexant for treatment of insomnia disorder has not been characterized comprehensively in the literature. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of available studies. We performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of daridorexant for treatment of insomnia disorder.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials were systematically searched up to February 2022. Relative risk and standard mean difference were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We pooled 2271 patients from 4 randomized clinical trials, and evaluated efficacy endpoints. We found that 50 mg of daridorexant was superior to placebo for 4 efficacy outcomes including wake time after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, subjective total sleep time, and Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire domain score (P < .05). In addition, there were no significant differences (P > .05) in adverse events between daridorexant and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Different dosages of daridorexant were tested for treatment of insomnia; however, 5 and 10 mg are not available because of issues of suboptimal effectiveness. Daridorexant showed better efficacy and safety for treatment of insomnia disorder at doses of 25 and 50 mg.

UPLC-MS/MS Based Identification and Quantification of a Novel Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonist in Plasma Samples by Validated SWGTOX Guidelines

Lemborexant (LEM) is a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), recently approved for the treatment of insomnia. As with other DORAs, LEM has potential of abuse and therefore placed in Schedule IV class by the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (USDEA). In this study, a sensitive and accurate UPLC-MS/MS assay was developed for the quantification of LEM in human plasma sample using losartan as an internal standard (IS). The chromatographic separation was performed by using gradient elution of mobile phase, comprising of 10 mM ammonium acetate and acetonitrile with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. An Acquity UPLC BEH C₁₈ (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) column was used for separation of LEM and IS by maintaining the oven temperature of 40 °C. The electrospray ionization in positive mode was used for sample ionization. The precursor to product ion transition of 411.12 > 175.09 (qualifier) and 411.1 > 287.14 (quantifier) was used for detection and quantification of LEM, respectively, in multiple reaction monitoring mode. Being a drug of abuse, the assay was validated according to "Scientific Working Group for Toxicology" (SWGTOX) guidelines, including limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision and bias, calibration model, interferences, carry-over effects, matrix effects, and stability parameters. The LOD and LOQ of the assay were 0.35 and 1.0 ng/mL, respectively. The linear range was between 1-300 ng/mL with correlation coefficient of ≥0.995. The method was also cross validated in rat plasma samples with acceptable ranges of precision and accuracy before its application for pharmacokinetic study in rats.

Comparative efficacy and safety of lemborexant 5 mg versus 10 mg for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Insomnia is a common condition that may be caused by or coexist with other medical or psychological illnesses. Nearly a quarter of a billion people across the globe suffer from insomnia frequently. Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is a recently authorized hypnotic-based medication for insomnia. The purpose of this systematic review is to further investigate its efficacy and safety profile, with the primary goal of comparing the effects of two FDA-approved doses of lemborexant, 5 mg and 10 mg (LEM5 and LEM10, respectively).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central were searched for relevant literature, and studies were considered if they compared the efficacy and safety of lemborexant 5 mg to lemborexant 10 mg. This study comprised clinical trials.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies were evaluated for efficacy and safety of lemborexant therapy. They reported a significant betterment in values pertaining to sleep efficacy, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, sleep quality, ISI score, and morning alertness. The results presented a dose-dependent pattern and showed slight variation with the different dosages. The most prevalent side effects noted were somnolence, headaches, and dizziness, with infections like UTIs and upper respiratory tract infections also being commonly reported. The incidence is rather ambiguous and not sincerely dose-dependent. The differences between results for LEM5 and LEM10 do not exhibit a wide variation, although slight dose-dependent alterations are noted.

CONCLUSION

Lemborexant is well integrated with the amelioration of sleep disturbances in insomniac patients, as shown by a decrease in eSOL and sWASO and a rise in sSE, sTST, quality of sleep, and morning alertness. Effects last 12 months after therapy.

Targeting Orexin Receptors for the Treatment of Insomnia: From Physiological Mechanisms to Current Clinical Evidence and Recommendations

After a detailed description of orexins and their roles in sleep and other medical disorders, we discuss here the current clinical evidence on the effects of dual (DORAs) or selective (SORAs) orexin receptor antagonists on insomnia with the aim to provide recommendations for their further assessment in a context of personalized and precision medicine. In the last decade, many trials have been conducted with orexin receptor antagonists, which represent an innovative and valid therapeutic option based on the multiple mechanisms of action of orexins on different biological circuits, both centrally and peripherally, and their role in a wide range of medical conditions which are often associated with insomnia. A very interesting aspect of this new category of drugs is that they have limited abuse liability and their discontinuation does not seem associated with significant rebound effects. Further studies on the efficacy of DORAs are required, especially on children and adolescents and in particular conditions, such as menopause. Which DORA is most suitable for each patient, based on comorbidities and/or concomitant treatments, should be the focus of further careful research. On the contrary, studies on SORAs, some of which seem to be appropriate also in insomnia in patients with psychiatric diseases, are still at an early stage and, therefore, do not allow to draw definite conclusions.

Orexin Receptor Antagonists in the Treatment of Depression: A Leading Article Summarising Pre-clinical and Clinical Studies

The orexin (hypocretin) system comprises two neuropeptides (orexin-A and orexin-B) and two G-protein coupled receptors (the orexin type 1 and the orexin type 2 receptor). The system regulates several biological functions including appetite, the sleep-wake cycle, the stress response, and motivation and reward processing. Dysfunction of the orexin system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression in human and animal studies, although the exact nature of this dysfunction remains unclear. Orexin receptor antagonists (ORAs) are a class of compounds developed for the treatment of insomnia and have demonstrated efficacy in this area. Three dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) have received licences for treatment of primary insomnia and some ORAs have since been investigated as potential treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). In this leading article, we summarise the existing literature on use of ORAs in depression, in pre-clinical and clinical studies. In rodent models of depression, investigated ORAs have included the DORA almorexant and TCS1102, the selective orexin 1 receptor antagonists SB334867 and SB674042 and the selective orexin 2 receptor antagonists LSN2424100, MK-1064 and TCS-OX2-29. These pre-clinical studies suggest a possible antidepressant effect of systemic DORA treatment, however the evidence from selective ORAs is conflicting. To date, four published RCTs (one with the DORA filorexant and three with the selective orexin 2 receptor antagonist seltorexant), have compared an ORA with placebo in the treatment of MDD. Only one of these demonstrated a statistically significant difference relative to placebo.

Effect of discontinuation of lemborexant following long-term treatment of insomnia disorder: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Discontinuing long-term pharmacotherapy for insomnia can result in rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms and suboptimal treatment. Post hoc analyses evaluated rebound insomnia and withdrawal symptoms among the subset of subjects from a phase III, 12-month, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study who completed 12 or 6 months of active treatment and follow-up period. Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303) included adults (N = 655) with subjective sleep-onset latency ≥30 min and/or subjective wake-after-sleep onset ≥60 min at least three times weekly during the 4 weeks before enrollment. Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to lemborexant 5 mg (LEM5) or 10 mg (LEM10) or placebo for 6 months. Thereafter, for an additional 6 months, LEM5- and LEM10-treated subjects continued lemborexant and the placebo group was rerandomized 1:1 to LEM5 or LEM10. Month 12 was followed by abrupt discontinuation and a 2-week end-of-study follow-up. Using daily electronic sleep diaries, patients reported (subjective) sleep end points (sleep-onset latency, wake-after-sleep onset, sleep efficiency, and total sleep time). Withdrawal symptoms were assessed using the Tyrer Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Symptoms Questionnaire (T-BWSQ). Sleep outcome improvements with lemborexant at month 12 were generally maintained throughout the 2-week off-treatment period wherein <20% of subjects experienced significant worsening of insomnia symptoms versus screening. There was no evidence of withdrawal symptoms by T-BWSQ following lemborexant discontinuation. This analysis demonstrates rebound insomnia is unlikely to occur with lemborexant, and its effectiveness is maintained after abrupt discontinuation without placebo replacement following 6-12 months of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of lemborexant over 12 months in Asian adults with insomnia disorder

Study objectives

Lemborexant (LEM) is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved for treating adults with insomnia. We analyzed the efficacy (subjective sleep outcomes) and safety of LEM over 12 months in the subgroup of Asian subjects from Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303).

Methods

Study 303 was a 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled (first 6 months), double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study of adults with insomnia disorder. During the 6-month Period 1, subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, LEM 5 mg (LEM5), or LEM 10 mg (LEM10); LEM subjects continued treatment in the following 6-month Period 2. Outcome measures included subject-reported (subjective) sleep onset latency (sSOL), sleep efficiency (sSE), wake after sleep onset (sWASO), total sleep time (sTST), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Patient Global Impression–Insomnia version (PGI-I). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.

Results

Overall, 178 Asian subjects (Japanese, n = 161; Chinese, n = 4; other Asian, n = 13) were included. Greater decreases in sSOL and sWASO and increases in sSE and sTST from baseline were observed with LEM vs placebo at 6 months; LEM benefits were sustained through 12 months. Greater decreases in ISI total score were seen with LEM vs placebo at 6 months; improvements from baseline with LEM continued through 12 months. For each PGI-I item, LEM-treated subjects had more positive medication effects than placebo-treated subjects at 6 months; these effects were maintained with LEM in Period 2. TEAEs were generally mild to moderate.

Conclusions

LEM improved subjective sleep parameters and was well-tolerated in Asian subjects with insomnia disorder over 12 months.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952820; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu, EudraCT Number 2015-001463-39.

•

Lemborexant improved subjective sleep measures and provided positive medication effects over 6 months versus placebo.

•

Benefits of lemborexant were sustained over 12 months.

•

Few (∼3%) lemborexant-treated Asian subjects discontinued treatment because of adverse events.

•

Lemborexant can potentially treat Asian persons with insomnia effectively, with fewer side effects than other medications.

Sleep disturbance as a therapeutic target to improve opioid use disorder treatment

Sleep health is an important factor across several physical and mental health disorders, and a growing scientific consensus has identified sleep as a critical component of opioid use disorder (OUD), both in the active disease state and during OUD recovery. The goal of this narrative review is to collate the literature on sleep, opioid use, and OUD as a means of identifying therapeutic targets to improve OUD treatment outcomes. Sleep disturbance is common and often severe in persons with OUD, especially during opioid withdrawal, but also in persons on opioid maintenance therapies. There is ample evidence that sleep disturbances including reduced total sleep time, disrupted sleep continuity, and poor sleep quality often accompany negative OUD treatment outcomes. Sleep disturbances are bidirectionally associated with several other factors related to negative treatment outcomes, including chronic stress, stress reactivity, low positive affect, high negative affect, chronic pain, and drug craving. This constellation of outcome variables represents a more comprehensive appraisal of the quality of life and quality of recovery than is typically assessed in OUD clinical trials. To date, there are very few clinical trials or experimental studies aimed at improving sleep health in OUD patients, either as a means of improving stress, affect, and craving outcomes, or as a potential mechanistic target to reduce opioid withdrawal and drug use behaviors. As such, the direct impact of sleep improvement in OUD patients is largely unknown, yet mechanistic and clinical research suggests that therapeutic interventions that target sleep are a promising avenue to improve OUD treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Orexin Receptor Antagonists and Insomnia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review recent evidence on the use of orexin receptor antagonists (ORAs) for treating insomnia. We evaluate studies on five dual ORAs and one selective ORA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research on suvorexant in recent years gradually focus on comorbid insomnia, while lemborexant and daridorexant were still being validated in primary insomnia. Almorexant is now mainly used as a commercial specific inhibitor of the orexin system in animal studies due to safety issues. Although filorexant has also shown a certain sleep-promoting effect, there are few clinical or experimental studies on sleep-related aspects of filorexant in recent years. As for selective ORAs, orexin receptor 2 antagonist seltorexant still has not yet reached phase 3. High-quality clinical trials in insomnia populations are needed which directly compare authorized ORAs and investigate non-approved ORAs, the use of ORAs in comorbid insomnia, and the orexin signaling system pathophysiology in insomnia.

Lemborexant, an orexin receptor antagonist sedative-hypnotic: Is it useful for insomnia in psychiatric disorders?

OBJECTIVE

Lemborexant, an orexin receptor antagonist similar to suvorexant, has been approved for the treatment of sleep onset and/or maintenance insomnia. Lemborexant is reviewed and compare to suvorexant from a psychiatric perspective.

CONCLUSION

Rapidly absorbed (peak 1-3 h), lemborexant has a half-life of 17-19 h (suvorexant half-life 12 h). It is metabolized by CYP3A4/5, with no significant effects of age, sex or weight. Trials for insomnia indicate sustained efficacy beyond 6 months. Lemborexant has not been trialled in major psychiatric disorders. Commenced at 5 mg, lemborexant can then be increased to 10 mg, taken at least 7 h before planned awakening. Adverse effects are higher at 10 mg: somnolence occurs in about 10% while headache and nightmares affect 2-5%, approximately similar to 40 mg suvorexant (recommended suvorexant dose 20 mg). Sleep paralysis, hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations, and cataplexy-like symptoms, complex sleep behaviours and emergence of depression/suicidal ideation can occur. Neither tolerance to sedation nor withdrawal effects on discontinuation have been observed. Whether the differences between lemborexant and suvorexant are clinically relevant is unclear. Like suvorexant, lemborexant appears to be effective in longer-term use for insomnia, but until efficacy and safety are adequately investigated in major mental disorders, clinicians need to monitor patient experience closely.

The orexin story, sleep and sleep disturbances

The orexins, also known as hypocretins, are two neuropeptides (orexin A and B or hypocretin 1 and 2) produced by a few thousand neurons located in the lateral hypothalamus that were independently discovered by two research groups in 1998. Those two peptides bind two receptors (orexin/hypocretin receptor 1 and receptor 2) that are widely distributed in the brain and involved in the central physiological regulation of sleep and wakefulness, orexin receptor 2 having the major role in the maintenance of arousal. They are also implicated in a multiplicity of other functions, such as reward seeking, energy balance, autonomic regulation and emotional behaviours. The destruction of orexin neurons is responsible for the sleep disorder narcolepsy with cataplexy (type 1) in humans, and a defect of orexin signalling also causes a narcoleptic phenotype in several animal species. Orexin discovery is unprecedented in the history of sleep research, and pharmacological manipulations of orexin may have multiple therapeutic applications. Several orexin receptor antagonists were recently developed as new drugs for insomnia, and orexin agonists may be the next-generation drugs for narcolepsy. Given the broad range of functions of the orexin system, these drugs might also be beneficial for treating various conditions other than sleep disorders in the near future.

Effect of alcohol coadministration on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of lemborexant: A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study

BACKGROUND

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved to treat insomnia in adults in several countries including the USA, Canada, and Japan.

AIMS

This study was conducted to investigate effects of lemborexant and alcohol coadministration on postural stability, cognitive performance, and the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of lemborexant.

METHODS

This was a Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study in 32 healthy adults. Individuals were randomized into one of four treatment sequences to receive single doses of placebo, lemborexant 10 mg (LEM10), alcohol (males, 0.7 g/kg; females, 0.6 g/kg), and LEM10 plus alcohol, each separated by a 14-day washout. Postural stability (body sway) was measured by ataxiameter and a cognitive performance assessment battery evaluated four domains of attention and memory.

RESULTS

Pharmacodynamic outcomes were analyzed for the 18 participants who completed all four treatments. Change from baseline in body sway showed no significant differences between lemborexant plus alcohol versus alcohol alone. Compared with alcohol alone, coadministration of lemborexant with alcohol showed additive negative effects on cognitive performance domains, corresponding approximately with peak plasma lemborexant concentrations (median = 1.5 h). Cognitive performance was also impaired with lemborexant alone at 0.5 and 2 h in this experimental paradigm with morning dosing. Alcohol increased plasma lemborexant exposure by 70% based on area under the curve to 72 h, and increased peak plasma lemborexant concentrations by 35%. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was somnolence.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of lemborexant with alcohol showed additive negative effects on cognitive measures, but not on postural stability, compared with alcohol alone. Lemborexant exposure was increased with alcohol. Lemborexant alone or with alcohol was well tolerated. Patients are advised not to consume alcohol with lemborexant.

Hypocretins (orexins): The ultimate translational neuropeptides

The hypocretins (Hcrts), also known as orexins, are two neuropeptides produced exclusively in the lateral hypothalamus. They act on two specific receptors that are widely distributed across the brain and involved in a myriad of neurophysiological functions that include sleep, arousal, feeding, reward, fear, anxiety and cognition. Hcrt cell loss in humans leads to narcolepsy with cataplexy (narcolepsy type 1), a disorder characterized by intrusions of sleep into wakefulness, demonstrating that the Hcrt system is nonredundant and essential for sleep/wake stability. The causal link between Hcrts and arousal/wakefulness stabilisation has led to the development of a new class of drugs, Hcrt receptor antagonists to treat insomnia, based on the assumption that blocking orexin-induced arousal will facilitate sleep. This has been clinically validated: currently, two Hcrt receptor antagonists are approved to treat insomnia (suvorexant and lemborexant), with a New Drug Application recently submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for a third drug (daridorexant). Other therapeutic applications under investigation include reduction of cravings in substance-use disorders and prevention of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, given the apparent bidirectional relationship between poor sleep and worsening of the disease. Circuit neuroscience findings suggest that the Hcrt system is a hub that integrates diverse inputs modulating arousal (e.g., circadian rhythms, metabolic status, positive and negative emotions) and conveys this information to multiple output regions. This neuronal architecture explains the wealth of physiological functions associated with Hcrts and highlights the potential of the Hcrt system as a therapeutic target for a number of disorders. We discuss present and future possible applications of drugs targeting the Hcrt system for the treatment of circuit-related neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions.

Narcolepsy-like symptoms triggered by lemborexant in the context of hyperactive delirium in a patient with bipolar depression: a case report

Lemborexant is a dual orexin antagonist (DORA) and is considered a safe and effective hypnotic. DORAs induce physiological sleep by blocking orexin receptors. Although the blockade of orexin signaling has triggered narcolepsy-like symptoms in rodents, there is currently no evidence of lemborexant inducing narcolepsy-like symptoms in humans. We describe the case of a 79-year-old Japanese woman with bipolar depression who experienced lemborexant-induced cataplexy and sleep attack. Her previous results on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test excluded the diagnosis of narcolepsy. She experienced narcolepsy-like symptoms on two occasions after she was administered lemborexant, in the context of hyperactive delirium, but not in a relaxed state. Her case suggests that lemborexant could trigger narcolepsy-like symptoms in patients with hyperactive delirium, even those with no history of narcolepsy. This case also emphasizes that clinicians must be very careful when they prescribe lemborexant to patients who experience hyperactive delirium.

Effects of TS-142, a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist, on sleep in patients with insomnia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study

RATIONALE

Novel compound with potent antagonistic activity against orexin receptors may be new treatment option for patients with insomnia.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of single oral doses of the dual orexin receptor antagonist TS-142 in patients with insomnia.

METHODS

This multicenter, double-blind, crossover randomized clinical trial included non-elderly patients with insomnia. Patients were randomized to receive single doses of placebo and TS-142 at doses of 5, 10, and 30 mg in one of four different sequences, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Primary efficacy endpoints were latency to persistent sleep (LPS) and wake time after sleep onset (WASO) measured by polysomnography.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included (mean age 50.3 ± 10.5 years; mean duration of insomnia 5.71 ± 8.68 years). Least-squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) from placebo in LPS with 5, 10, and 30 mg TS-142 were - 42.38 (- 60.13, - 24.63), - 42.10 (- 60.02, - 24.17), and - 44.68 (- 62.41, - 26.95) minutes, respectively (all p < 0.001). Least-squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) from placebo in WASO with 5, 10, and 30 mg TS-142 were - 27.52 (- 46.90, - 8.14), - 35.44 (- 55.02, - 15.87), and - 54.69 (- 74.16, - 35.23) minutes, respectively (all p < 0.01). Self-reported aspects of sleep initiation and sleep quality, determined using the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ), were also improved with TS-142 administration versus placebo. TS-142 was well tolerated; all adverse events were mild or moderate and none were serious.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose TS-142 was well tolerated and had clinically relevant effects on objective and subjective sleep parameters in patients with insomnia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI173570 (www.

CLINICALTRIALS

jp); NCT04573725 (www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov).

Efficacy, Safety, and Drug–Drug Interactions for Insomnia Therapy in COVID-19 Patients

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a systemic viral infection. COVID-19 patients show diverse clinical presentations ranging from asymptomatic, mild symptoms to severe symptoms characterized by severe respiratory distress. Sleep disorders or insomnia is one of the psychiatric problems that arise during the COVID-19 pandemic. The term used to define this particular insomnia is coronasomnia or COVID-19 insomnia. Data show that the prevalence of this problem is increasing, especially in the confirmed COVID-19 patient group. Anti-insomnia drugs such as hypnotics, sedatives, and anxiolytics are the easiest option. As with drugs generally, anti-insomnia drugs are associated with various safety issues, especially in people with COVID-19. Therefore, their use may be hazardous. The literature review aims to make health practitioners aware of the anti-insomnia drugs that have the best efficacy and safety issues that are clinically relevant from the use of anti-insomnia drugs and the interactions of anti-insomnia drugs with various drugs used in the treatment of COVID-19. The articles were explored on PubMed and Cochrane Library, whereas the drug–drug interactions between the anti-insomnia and COVID-19 drugs were searched on Drugs.com Interaction Checker and Lexiomp-interact. Overall anti-insomnia drugs have efficacy in improving sleep parameters. Orexin receptor antagonist drugs have good efficacy in increasing WASO, LPS, and SE with an acceptable safety profile. Meanwhile, the combination of zolpidem, lorazepam, and diphenhydramine improved TST parameters better than other drugs. Side effects such as drowsiness and dizziness were among the most commonly reported effects. Therefore, attention and monitoring of the use of anti-insomnia drugs in COVID-19 patients need to be carried out by considering the side effects and interactions that are very risky.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists for treatment of insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of suvorexant and lemborexant

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent treatment guidelines for chronic insomnia recommend pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. One of the contemporary drug options for insomnia includes dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), such as suvorexant and lemborexant. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for the treatment of insomnia with suvorexant and lemborexant based on randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trials.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search on three databases (PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) till August 14, 2021, without any restrictions to retrieve the relevant articles. The effect sizes were computed presenting the pooled mean difference or risk ratio along with 95% confidence interval of each outcome.

RESULTS

Our search showed eight articles (five for suvorexant and three for lemborexant). Results of diary measures, rating scales, polysomnography results, treatment discontinuation, and adverse events were measured. All efficacy outcome measures favorably and significantly differed in the suvorexant compared to placebo. Safety profile did not differ significantly except for somnolence, excessive daytime sleepiness/sedation, fatigue, back pain, dry mouth, and abnormal dreams. Important adverse events including hallucinations, suicidal ideation/behavior and motor vehicle accidents did not differ between suvorexant and placebo. All the efficacy outcomes significantly differed between lemborexant 5 and lemborexant 10 compared to placebo. Somnolence rate for lemborexant 5 and lemborexant 10 and nightmare for lemborexant 10 were significantly higher than placebo.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis reported that suvorexant and lemborexant are efficacious and safe agents for the patients with insomnia. Further data in patients with insomnia and various comorbid conditions are needed.

FLUID study: study protocol for an open-label, single-centre pilot study to investigate the efFect of Lemborexant on sleep management in Japanese sUbjects aged 50 years and older with Insomnia Disorder

INTRODUCTION

Bidirectional associations have been reported between sleep disturbance and both cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer's disease and amyloid beta-peptide (Aβ) accumulation. These relationships can be explained by the glymphatic system, which acts as a garbage drainage system in the brain. As interstitial fluid dynamics are suggested to increase during sleep, clearance of Aβ can be influenced by sleep disturbance or deprivation. We hypothesised that using lemborexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, to improve sleep quality would also improve the function of the glymphatic system. We plan to examine the effect of lemborexant on sleep quality and the glymphatic system among patients with insomnia disorder.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This pilot study is designed as an open-label, single-arm, single-centre trial. Thirty patients aged 50 years and over with insomnia will be recruited. The participants will take lemborexant (5 mg) at bedtime for 12 weeks and undergo a home-based sleep study at baseline and weeks 4 and 12, as well as MRI examinations to evaluate the glymphatic system at baseline and week 12. The primary outcome will be changes in objective sleep parameters as evaluated using a sleep monitoring system. The secondary outcomes will be changes in subjective sleep parameters. The relationships between changes in sleep parameters and the glymphatic system will be evaluated using diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space, which is called the ALPS-index. Sleep parameters and the ALPS-index will be analysed using a paired t-test or Pearson's correlation coefficient.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by Nagoya University Certified Review Board. The findings from this research will be published in peer-reviewed journals and be presented at local, national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs041210024.

Reversal of Regioselectivity in Nucleophilic Difluoroalkylation of α,β-Enones Employing In Situ-Formed Sterically Encumbered Silylium Catalyst

An efficient approach for the reversal of regioselectivity in the nucleophilic introduction of difluorinated carbanion into α,β-enones has been developed via a silylium catalysis. The strong electron-withdrawing properties and bulky substituents of in situ-generated silyl triflic imide catalyst is the key for the 1,4-addition reaction to proceed smoothly. The synthetic utility is highlighted by the further use of this method for the synthesis of 2,4,6-triarylsubstituted 3-fluoropyridines in a one-pot manner.

Comparative efficacy of lemborexant and other insomnia treatments: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is a common disorder associated with a substantial burden of illness, particularly in older adults. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of lemborexant with specified other insomnia treatments through a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Medline and Embase were systematically searched from inception to February 2019 and updated with a targeted search of PubMed for pivotal trials in March 2021. Randomized controlled trials in adults with primary insomnia were included if they reported results following at least 1 week of treatment. Interventions of interest were specified as lemborexant, suvorexant, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists (also called Z-drugs [zolpidem, eszopiclone, zaleplon, zopiclone]), trazodone, and ramelteon. Efficacy outcomes included wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency (SE), latency to persistent sleep (LPS)/sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Bayesian NMA were performed at predetermined time intervals approximating 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Safety outcomes included serious adverse events (SAEs), withdrawals due to adverse events (AEs), and specified AEs (dizziness, somnolence, and falls). Subgroup analysis was conducted in the older population. RESULTS: 45 studies were included in the NMA. At 4 weeks, lemborexant had the highest probability of being the best treatment for 3 of the 4 outcomes measured objectively by polysomnography-TST, LPS, and SE-and was ranked second to suvorexant on WASO. Eszopiclone was highly ranked for subjectively measured SOL and ISI at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Lemborexant was rated more highly than suvorexant in subjective measures of WASO, TST, and SOL at 4 weeks (the differences were not statistically significant). No statistically significant interactions between treatment effect and older subpopulations were found, indicating that the treatment effect was similar in older and adult populations. The safety profile of lemborexant was broadly similar to the other treatments for SAEs and withdrawals due to AEs. A limitation is the age of some of the included studies (3 were published in 1990 or earlier). A further limitation is the lack of stratification of recommended doses. If the doses used in the study publications do not reflect doses used in clinical practice, this could potentially bias the results. CONCLUSIONS: Lemborexant was ranked highest of the treatments studied on 3 out of the 4 objectively measured insomnia efficacy outcomes, with a safety profile broadly similar to other insomnia treatments. DISCLOSURES: This work was funded by Eisai Inc., which was involved with all stages of the study and analysis. McElroy, O'Leary, and Adena are consultants with Datalytics Pty Ltd., which was paid by Eisai Inc. for conducting the literature review and analysis. They were not financially compensated for collaborative efforts on publication-related activities. Campbell, Tahami Monfared, and Meier are employed by Eisai Inc. This study was presented as a poster at AMCP Nexus Virtual, October 20-23, 2020 and at the AGS Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting 2021, May 13-15, 2021.

Effects of Lemborexant on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Contraceptives: Results From a Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study in Healthy Females

Lemborexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in multiple countries including the United States, Canada, and Japan for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As women of childbearing potential may be prescribed insomnia drugs, a drug‐drug interaction study was conducted. This single‐center, open‐label, fixed‐sequence study examined potential drug‐drug interactions between lemborexant and an oral contraceptive (OC) in healthy females (18–44 years, n = 20). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of lemborexant 10 mg (at steady state) on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of OC (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 1.5 mg norethindrone acetate), assess the effect of a single dose of OC on lemborexant pharmacokinetics, and evaluate safety and tolerability of lemborexant and OC coadministration. Ethinyl estradiol maximum plasma drug concentration was not altered by lemborexant coadministration; area under the curve from zero time to the last quantifiable concentration was slightly increased, by 13%. No clinically relevant effects on norethindrone acetate pharmacokinetics were observed. Coadministration of OC with lemborexant had no clinically relevant effect on the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of lemborexant. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile. These results support the conclusion that lemborexant and OC can be coadministered without dose adjustment.

Insomnia: Pharmacologic Treatment

Insomnia afflicts many geriatric patients worldwide and results in both clinical and economic consequences. Prescribing hypnotics to the elderly is particularly challenging due to multitudes of adverse effects and drug interactions. Although benzodiazepines and "Z" drugs such as zolpidem have been popular in the past, they carry a high risk of adverse effects in the elderly, such as devastating falls and injuries as well as potentially an increase in mortality. Newer classes of hypnotics such as dual orexin receptor antagonists are much better tolerated and can be explored as a potential treatment for insomnia in the elderly.

Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant, a Dual Receptor Orexin Antagonist (DORA), in the Treatment of Adults With Insomnia Disorder

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of lemborexant in the treatment of insomnia disorder by assessing the currently available literature.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed was performed (2010 to March 2021) using the following search terms: lemborexant, sleep, orexin.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant English-language studies were reviewed and considered, with a focus on phase 3 trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The efficacy and safety of lemborexant in the treatment of insomnia disorder in adults was demonstrated in 2 phase 3 trials. Lemborexant significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep compared with placebo. The first study also demonstrated a significant reduction compared with the active control zolpidem ER. Somnolence and headache were relatively common, but the marked adverse effects associated with other medications commonly used to treat insomnia, such as cognitive and psychomotor impairment and complex sleep-related behaviors, were not observed.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Although nonpharmacological therapy is considered first-line treatment for insomnia disorder, pharmacological treatment is most commonly utilized. Lemborexant is a viable pharmacological treatment option for patients who are unable to tolerate the adverse effects associated with the most commonly prescribed medications for insomnia, such as benzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotics (Z drugs). This is especially true for geriatric patients, who may be more sensitive to these adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Lemborexant can be recommended to treat insomnia disorder when pharmacological treatment is warranted. It has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and is likely better tolerated than most currently available treatment options.

Hypocretin/Orexin Receptor Pharmacology and Sleep Phases

The hypocretins/orexins are two excitatory neuropeptides, alternately called HCRT1 or orexin-A and HCRT2 or orexin-B, that are the endogenous ligands for two G-protein-coupled receptors, HCRTR1/OX1R and HCRTR2/OX2R. Shortly after the discovery of this system, degeneration of hypocretin/orexin-producing neurons was implicated in the etiology of the sleep disorder narcolepsy. The involvement of this system in a disorder characterized by the loss of control over arousal state boundaries also suggested its role as a critical component of endogenous sleep-wake regulatory circuitry. The broad projections of the hypocretin/orexin-producing neurons, along with differential expression of the two receptors in the projection fields of these neurons, suggest distinct roles for these receptors. While HCRTR1/OX1R is associated with regulation of motivation, reward, and autonomic functions, HCRTR2/OX2R is strongly linked to sleep-wake control. The association of hypocretin/orexin with these physiological processes has led to intense interest in the therapeutic potential of compounds targeting these receptors. Agonists and antagonists for the hypocretin/orexin receptors have shown potential for the treatment of disorders of excessive daytime somnolence and nocturnal hyperarousal, respectively, with the first antagonists approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014 and 2019 for the treatment of insomnia. These and related compounds have also been useful tools to advance hypocretin/orexin neurobiology.

Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in adults with insomnia: comparing Japanese and non-Japanese subgroups from the global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled SUNRISE 2 study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Whether there are racial differences in the efficacy/safety of hypnotics has not been sufficiently investigated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy/safety of lemborexant 5 mg and lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo once daily in a subset of Japanese patients with insomnia and to compare the results with those of non-Japanese patients.

METHODS

This subanalysis reports the results of the first 6 months (period 1, placebo-controlled) of SUNRISE 2, a 12-month, global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Changes in patient-reported sleep onset latency, patient-reported sleep efficiency, and patient-reported wake after sleep onset with lemborexant 5 mg or lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo were evaluated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated for safety.

RESULTS

In total, 949 patients were randomized (Japanese, n = 161; non-Japanese, n = 788). Groups were balanced at baseline except for the male/female ratio (P = .0002) and body mass index (P < .0001) in the Japanese vs non-Japanese subgroups. Overall, the efficacy and safety of lemborexant were similar between subgroups. In the Japanese subgroup, the subjective sleep onset latency change from baseline was significant after 7 nights and 6 months with lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo, the subjective sleep efficiency change from baseline was significant after 7 nights with lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo, and the subjective wake after sleep onset change from baseline was significant at 6 months with lemborexant 5 mg vs placebo. The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent between both subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg improved sleep onset and sleep maintenance over 6 months and was well-tolerated in both the Japanese and non-Japanese patients. The safety profiles of lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg were consistent between the subgroups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Long-term Study of Lemborexant in Insomnia Disorder (SUNRISE 2); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02952820; Identifier: NCT02952820; and Registry: ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu; Identifier: 2015-001463-39.

Evaluating lemborexant for the treatment of insomnia

INTRODUCTION

Insomnia is a complex sleep disorder that compromises quality of life and affects approximately 10% of the general population. Insomnia, defined as trouble initiating or maintaining sleep associated with impaired daytime function or distress, is treated using a comprehensive approach comprised of cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy. Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is a new pharmacotherapeutic option recently approved for the treatment of insomnia.

AREAS COVERED

Here, the authors describe lemborexant, assess its efficacy and safety profile in clinical trials, and evaluate its role in the current insomnia treatment landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

Lemborexant may offer an improved treatment option compared with other pharmacotherapies for insomnia because it is effective both over the long term and over a wide range of outcome measures. Importantly, lemborexant improves latency to sleep onset and sleep maintenance and is able to help people who experience early morning awakenings. Safety data reveal that lemborexant has minimal residual effects on morning alertness or next day function, and that patients are able to respond to an external auditory stimulus in the middle of the night. In conclusion, lemborexant represents a new, effective, and well-tolerated medication for patients with insomnia.

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of lemborexant compared with placebo in adults with insomnia disorder: results from the phase 3 randomized clinical trial SUNRISE 2

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess long-term efficacy and safety of lemborexant (LEM), a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist, versus placebo in adults with insomnia disorder.

METHODS

This was a 12-month, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 study comprising a 6-month placebo-controlled period (reported here) followed by a 6-month active-treatment-only period (reported separately). A total of 949 participants with insomnia (age ≥18 years) were randomized, received treatment with an oral dose of placebo or LEM (5 mg [LEM5] or 10 mg [LEM10]) and were analyzed. Sleep onset and sleep maintenance endpoints were analyzed from daily electronic sleep diary data. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

Decreases from baseline in patient-reported (subjective) sleep onset latency and subjective wake after sleep onset, and increases from baseline in subjective sleep efficiency, were significantly greater with LEM5 and LEM10 versus placebo. Significant benefits over placebo were observed at the end of month 6, and at most time points assessed over the 6-month period, indicating long-term sustained efficacy of LEM. A significantly greater percentage of sleep onset responders and sleep maintenance responders were observed with LEM treatment versus placebo. Participants treated with LEM reported a significant improvement in quality of sleep after 6 months versus placebo. The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate. There was a low rate of serious TEAEs and no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

LEM5 and LEM10 provided significant benefit on sleep onset and sleep maintenance in individuals with insomnia disorder versus placebo, and was well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02952820; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu, EudraCT Number 2015-001463-39.

Evaluation of SAMP8 Mice as a Model for Sleep-Wake and Rhythm Disturbances Associated with Alzheimer's Disease: Impact of Treatment with the Dual Orexin (Hypocretin) Receptor Antagonist Lemborexant

Background:

Many patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) display circadian rhythm and sleep-wake disturbances. However, few mouse AD models exhibit these disturbances. Lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is under development for treating circadian rhythm disorders in dementia.

Objective:

Evaluation of senescence-accelerated mouse prone-8 (SAMP8) mice as a model for sleep-wake and rhythm disturbances in AD and the effect of lemborexant by assessing sleep-wake/diurnal rhythm behavior.

Methods:

SAMP8 and control senescence-accelerated mouse resistant-1 (SAMR1) mice received vehicle or lemborexant at light onset; plasma lemborexant and diurnal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) orexin concentrations were assessed. Sleep-wake behavior and running wheel activity were evaluated.

Results:

Plasma lemborexant concentrations were similar between strains. The peak/nadir timing of CSF orexin concentrations were approximately opposite between strains. During lights-on, SAMP8 mice showed less non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) and REM sleep than SAMR1 mice. Lemborexant treatment normalized wakefulness/non-REM sleep in SAMP8 mice. During lights-off, lemborexant-treated SAMR1 mice showed increased non-REM sleep; lemborexant-treated SAMP8 mice displayed increased wakefulness. SAMP8 mice showed differences in electroencephalogram architecture versus SAMR1 mice. SAMP8 mice exhibited more running wheel activity during lights-on. Lemborexant treatment reduced activity during lights-on and increased activity in the latter half of lights-off, demonstrating a corrective effect on overall diurnal rhythm. Lemborexant delayed the acrophase of activity in both strains by approximately 1 hour.

Conclusion:

SAMP8 mice display several aspects of sleep-wake and rhythm disturbances in AD, notably mistimed activity. These findings provide some preclinical rationale for evaluating lemborexant in patients with AD who experience sleep-wake and rhythm disturbances.