Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Public Health Implications and a Novel Model Treatment Guideline

From Chronic Cannabis to Cyclic Chaos: A Glimpse Into Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) pathophysiology remains largely unknown, and it is often misdiagnosed. This paper identifies the clinical causes of CHS, outlines diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and emphasizes early detection, comprehensive treatment, and timely intervention for improved patient outcomes. This case describes a 38-year-old male with a known history of cannabis use who experienced repeated episodes of intense vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain consistent with symptoms of CHS. He was initially misdiagnosed with other gastrointestinal conditions despite the knowledge of marijuana ingestion. The diagnosis of CHS was initially missed; however, after further examination and consideration of his marijuana use, CHS was correctly identified. The patient's symptoms improved after the cessation of marijuana use. This case illustrates the diagnostic difficulties of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) in cannabis users with significant gastrointestinal symptoms. The early detection and cessation of marijuana use are crucial for symptom management and resolution, emphasizing clinical awareness and personalized treatment.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome

SummaryCannabis use is legalised in many countries. We present a patient in their 40s who complained of recurrent abdominal pain and associated nausea and vomiting. The patient was previously seen in various hospitals, treated symptomatically, and discharged with a diagnosis of non-specific abdominal pain. The patient had a chronic history of smoking cannabis and nicotine and drinking alcohol. Abdominal examination revealed no masses, and abdominal X-ray was normal. Blood tests and gastroduodenoscopy revealed no obvious aetiology. Intravenous fluids, together with antiemetics and proton pump inhibitors, were administered. The patient also received counselling and was advised to stop cannabis use. At discharge, the patient was well and asked to come back for review in 2 weeks, and, thereafter monthly for a period of 6 months after stopping cannabis use. The patient reported no recurrent symptoms despite continued cigarette and alcohol use. A suspected cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) became a consideration. Awareness of cannabis-related disorders such as CHS may assist in avoiding costly hospital workups.

Rising Inpatient Utilization and Costs of Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome Hospitalizations in Massachusetts After Cannabis Legalization

GOALS

We described the demographics, inpatient utilization, and cost of services among patients hospitalized for putative cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) predating and postdating cannabis legalization in Massachusetts.

BACKGROUND

As the recreational use of cannabis has been widely legalized nationally, the resulting shifts in clinical presentation, health care utilization, and estimated costs of CHS hospitalizations remain unclear in the postlegalization era.

STUDY

We performed a retrospective cohort study among patients admitted to a large urban hospital between 2012 and 2021, before and after the date of cannabis legalization in Massachusetts (Dec 15, 2016). We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients admitted for putative CHS, the utilization of hospital services, and estimated inpatient costs pre and postlegalization.

RESULTS

We identified a significant increase in putative CHS hospitalizations pre and post-cannabis legalization in Massachusetts (0.1% vs 0.02% of total admissions per time period, P < 0.05). Across 72 CHS hospitalizations, patient demographics were similar pre and postlegalization. Hospital resource utilization increased postlegalization, with increased length of stay (3 d vs 1 d, P < 0.005), and need for antiemetics ( P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression confirmed that postlegalization admissions were independently associated with increased length of stay ( Β = 5.35, P < 0.05). The mean cost of hospitalization was significantly higher postlegalization ($18,714 vs $7460, P < 0.0005), even after adjusting for medical inflation ($18,714 vs $8520, P < 0.001) with intravenous fluid administration and endoscopy costs increased ( P < 0.05). On multivariate linear regression, hospitalization for putative CHS during postlegalization predicted increased costs ( Β = 10,131.25, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the postlegalization era of cannabis in Massachusetts, we found increased putative CHS hospitalizations, with a concomitant increased length of hospital stay and total cost per hospitalization. As cannabis use increases, the recognition and costs of its deleterious effects are necessary to incorporate into future clinical practice strategies and health policy.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome presenting with ventricular bigeminy

The is a case of a 28-year-old male presenting to an emergency department (ED) via emergency medical services (EMS) with a chief complaint of "gastritis." He was noted to have bigeminy on the pre-arrival EMS electrocardiogram. He was ultimately diagnosed with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). CHS is becoming an exceedingly common emergency department presentation due to the poorly regulated but widespread availability of cannabis products. The authors discuss a case of CHS and ventricular bigeminy.

[Does medicinal cannabis or cannabis consumption have an influence on the perioperative anesthesiological management?]

The greatly increasing use of medicinal cannabis products as well as the upcoming legalization of cannabis not only require a general re-evaluation of how these substances might be classified as illegal drugs, but also enforce a critical view on the possible consequences that cannabis consumption might have on the anesthesiological strategies applied for surgical procedures. Although high-quality clinical studies are still lacking, several clinical studies meanwhile indicate that an active preoperative cannabis consumption seems to be associated with relevant pathophysiological aspects. Patients who regularly consume high doses of cannabis show an increased risk of cardiovascular and respiratory complications as well as the postoperative nausea and vomitting (PONV) associated with anesthesia. This also applies to relatively young patients. Moreover, the requirements for general anesthetics and analgesics seem to be increased in the context of cannabis consumption, e.g., these patients may require additional efforts when it comes to monitoring the depth of anesthesia and providing a personalized multimodal postoperative pain therapy. It therefore appears to be meaningful to carefully assess and document the extent and duration of the preoperative cannabis consumption during the preoperative assessment. Furthermore, the possibility to perform a preoperative dose reduction of cannabis products in cases with high doses should at least be considered. As the consumption of cannabis is not only increasing in Germany but also worldwide, important future insights will offer a guide towards a safe handling of cannabis in perioperative medicine in the coming years.

Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome and Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome: The State of the Science

This article provides a narrative review of the state of the science for both cyclic vomiting syndrome and cannabis hyperemesis syndrome along with a discussion of the relationship between these 2 conditions. The scope of this review includes the historical context of these conditions as well as the prevalence, diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis, and treatment strategies for both conditions. A synopsis of the endocannabinoid system provides a basis for the hypothesis that a lack of cannabidiol in modern high-potency Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol cannabis may be contributory to cannabis hyperemesis syndrome and possibly other cannabis use disorders. In concluding assessment, though the publications addressing both adult cyclic vomiting syndrome and cannabis hyperemesis syndrome are steadily increasing overall, the state of the science supporting the treatments, prognosis, etiology, and confounding factors (including cannabis use) is of moderate quality. Much of the literature portrays these conditions separately and as such sometimes fails to account for the confounding of adult cyclic vomiting syndrome with cannabis hyperemesis syndrome. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are, at present, based generally on case series publications and expert opinion, with a very limited number of randomized controlled trials and a complete absence of Level 1 evidence within the cyclic vomiting literature overall as well as for cannabis hyperemesis syndrome specifically.

Addressing cannabis consumption among patients with hyperemesis gravidarum

Severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum affect up to 3% of all pregnant people, causing substantial maternal and neonatal morbidity, suffering, and financial cost. Evidence supports the association of cannabis consumption with symptoms of severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy or hyperemesis gravidarum as the general public has come to believe that cannabis is a natural, safe antiemetic. Cannabis consumption in pregnancy is discouraged strongly by the Surgeon General of the United States and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists because of evidence of potential harms. Symptoms of intractable, severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy or hyperemesis gravidarum associated with cannabis consumption may be unrecognized cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, and this syndrome may be more common than previously thought. Cannabis consumption is especially detrimental when causing or exacerbating debilitating symptoms such as the intense, persistent, recurrent, or cyclic vomiting and associated dehydration and other sequelae of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. Open discussion of cannabis consumption during pregnancy is very challenging for patients and maternity care providers in our current environment of variable legal status across states and variable degrees of personal and societal acceptance. Evidence-based medical knowledge, guidance, tools, and skills are needed to differentially diagnose and treat cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in pregnancy. Researchers, clinicians, and medical specialty organizations must work together to strengthen the evidence base and develop or refine the necessary guidelines and tools for maternity care provider skill development, and to increase public and patient awareness of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, specifically during pregnancy.

Case report: A case of undiagnosed cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in rural part of Nepal

Introduction

and importance: Cannabinoid, a widely used recreational drug worldwide. In Nepal, it is found easily and has multiple used as well as misused as a psychoactive substance. Despite having anti emetic property of Marijuana, chronic use of the substance can lead to cyclic vomiting syndrome due to effect in central nervous system and gastrointestinal system.

Case

we present a case of 28 year old man presented frequently with severe vomiting and abdominal pain which improved with hot showers and stopping use of cannabinoid.

Clinical findings and investigation

Patient abdomen was tender but all other physical examinations were within normal limits. His lab investigations were within normal limit except of Total leukocyte count and urine analysis.

Intervention and outcome

The patient was hospitalized and treated for dehydration, nausea and vomiting, and abdominal pain. The patient was diagnosed with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and was discharged from the hospital two days later with the advice to stop using cannabis completely.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and cannabis withdrawal syndrome: a review of the management of cannabis-related syndrome in the emergency department

Background

Cannabis-related medical consultations are increasing worldwide, a non-negligible public health issue; patients presenting to acute care traditionally complain of abdominal pain and vomiting. Often recurrent, these frequent consultations add to the congestion of already chronically saturated emergency department(s) (ED). In order to curb this phenomenon, a specific approach for these patients is key, to enable appropriate treatment and long-term follow-up.

Objectives

This study reviews cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) and cannabis withdrawal syndrome (CWS), in a bid to help promote better understanding and handling of pathologies associated with chronic cannabis use. Following a literature review, we present a novel therapeutic algorithm aimed at guiding clinicians, in a bid to improve long-term outcomes and prevent recurrences.

Methods

Using the keywords “Cannabis,” “Hyperemesis,” “Syndrome,” “Withdrawal,” and “Emergency Medicine,” we completed a literature review of three different electronic databases (PubMed®, Google scholar®, and Cochrane®), up to November 2021.

Results

Although often presenting with similar symptoms such as abdominal pain and vomiting, cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) and cannabis withdrawal syndrome (CWS) are the result of two differing pathophysiological processes. Distinguishing between these two syndromes is essential to provide appropriate symptomatic options.

Conclusion

The correct identification of the underlying cannabis-related syndrome, and subsequent therapeutic choice, may help decrease ED presentations. Our study emphasizes the importance of both acute care and long-term outpatient follow-up, as key processes in cannabis-related disorder treatment.

Marijuana use in children: An update focusing on pediatric tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol use

Cannabis is the most used recreational drug in the United States, and its use is increasing among children and adolescents.  With the increase in legalized use, there have been increases in intentional and accidental cannabis exposure in the pediatric population. There is also minimized perceived risk.  We review the current use of cannabis and its derivatives, the drug effects and clinical presentation, common misconceptions, pharmacology, and epidemiology. Finally, we review some long-term consequences of cannabis use.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome Complicated by Pneumomediastinum: Implications for Pediatric Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) is a form of cyclic vomiting syndrome characterized by episodic vomiting occurring every few weeks or months and is associated with prolonged and frequent use of high-dose cannabis. CHS in the pediatric population has been increasingly reported over the last decade and can lead to life-threatening complications such as pneumomediastinum, which warrant careful consideration for surgical intervention.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 17-year-old female with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting for 24 hours. She had four episodes of green-yellow emesis followed by dry heaves. She also complained of chest and back pain, worse with deep inspiration. Upon further history, the patient reported a similar episode of abdominal pain and repetitive vomiting six months prior to the current episode. She smoked cannabis at least once daily and has done so for the past two years. Chest X-ray revealed a subtle abnormal lucency along the anteroposterior window and anterior mediastinum, consistent with a small amount of pneumomediastinum without any other acute intrathoracic abnormalities. Follow-up chest computed tomography with contrast showed multiple foci of air within the anterior and posterior mediastinum tracking up to the thoracic inlet. There was no evidence of contrast extravasation; however, small esophageal perforation could not be excluded. Given uncomplicated pneumomediastinum without frank contrast extravasation, the patient was treated medically with piperacillin-tazobactam, metronidazole, and micafungin for microbial prophylaxis; hydromorphone for pain control; as well as with pantoprazole, ondansetron, and promethazine. Nutrition was provided via total parenteral nutrition. The patient was intensely monitored for signs of occult esophageal perforation, but none were detected. She was advanced to a soft diet on hospital day eight, solid food diet on day nine, at which point antibiotics were discontinued, and the patient was subsequently discharged.

CONCLUSION

CHS in an increasingly common disorder encountered in the pediatric setting due to rising prevalence of cannabis use. The management of CHS and potentially life-threatening complications such as pneumomediastinum should be given careful consideration. Pneumomediastinum can be a harbinger of more sinister pathology such as esophageal perforation, which may warrant urgent surgical intervention.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: A Case Report of an Underdiagnosed Condition

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is characterized by episodic bursts of nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, affecting chronic cannabis users. The clinical picture mimics an acute abdomen, usually leading to multiple assessments in the emergency department. Several complementary diagnostic examinations are performed with non-specific results, making differential diagnosis puzzling. We present a case of a 42-year-old man, who has been admitted multiple times to the emergency department in the last 3 months for abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, without triggering factors and improving only with hot water baths. He was evaluated by different specialties, the various complementary diagnostic tests performed showed no significant results, and no definitive diagnosis was obtained. Treatment resulted only in a partial and transient resolution of symptoms. A more detailed medical history revealed cannabis use for more than 5 years, with a recent increase in the amount consumed. After psychoeducation, explaining the risks associated with consumption and its relationship with the clinical symptoms, which resulted in complete suspension of cannabis, there have been no new symptomatic episodes since then. We present an illustrative case of a poorly reported clinical entity despite having a probable significant prevalence, raising awareness in order that clinicians identify and properly manage these cases.

Prevalence of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and its financial burden on the health care industry

Cannabis is the most commonly consumed recreational drug in the world. As more states legalize cannabis use in some form, the incidence of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is expected to rise. CHS is a constellation of symptoms including severe cyclical nausea and vomiting and epigastric or periumbilical abdominal pain as a result of long-term cannabis use. Recognizing the diagnosis and educating patients on the benefits of cessation is essential, as these patients often undergo extensive and repeated evaluations in the clinic, emergency department, and inpatient setting that could be avoided with extensive history taking and early recognition of the syndrome. In this study, we compared costs incurred by patients in various settings to determine if there is a difference between patients with and without CHS. Although there were not statistically significant cost differences between groups for all cost categories, it is clear that patients with CHS consume considerably more health care dollars than patients who deny cannabis use, and obtaining a detailed social history is imperative to prevent unnecessary workups and increased financial burden on the health care industry.

Death of a young woman with cyclic vomiting: a case report

We report the death of a 22-year-old woman, with a 3½ year history of cyclic vomiting and cannabis use since age 14, who developed torsades de pointes cardiac arrythmia while being treated in the emergency room for nausea and vomiting. Resuscitation restored spontaneous cardiac circulation, however, due to post-cardiac arrest anoxic brain injury, she never regained consciousness and was declared brain dead 4 days later. Postmortem examination confirmed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, in keeping with the in-hospital diagnosis of brain death. The heart was anatomically normal but showed signs of acute post-cardiopulmonary arrest reperfusion injury. As a consequence of limited survival in hospital in a neuro-vegetative state, early bronchopneumonia and isolated pulmonary thromboemboli were seen. Toxicological studies confirmed cannabis use, in addition to the presence of haloperidol and ondansetron. Genetic studies were performed to rule out a possible channelopathy and revealed a mutation in the MYBPC3 and RYR2 genes. Death in this woman with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome was attributed to a fatal cardiac arrhythmia complicating vomiting-induced hypokalemia and treatment with QT interval prolonging and potentially arrhythmogenic medications, with the identified cardiac genetic mutations listed as contributing factors. The emphasis of this report is a) to raise awareness that death can occur due to cyclic vomiting, b) provide a brief but practical overview of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, c) describe the findings from our postmortem examination and come to the most reasonable cause and mechanism of death, d) comment on the risk factors associated with torsades de pointes cardiac arrythmia, and e) conclude that a complete postmortem examination is needed to exclude an anatomical or toxicological cause of death in cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, a disabling but preventable disorder.

Efficacy of topical capsaicin for cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in a pediatric and adult emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a clinical diagnosis characterized by symptoms of recurrent nausea, vomiting, and severe abdominal pain in the setting of chronic cannabis use. Symptoms of CHS are frequently unresponsive to standard antiemetic therapy. Topical capsaicin applied to the abdomen has been cited as a potential effective agent for CHS however robust evidence is lacking.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy of topical capsaicin in pediatric and adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected or confirmed CHS. The primary outcome assessed was if utilization of capsaicin for CHS resulted in more patients achieving an "efficacious" result, defined as only requiring ≤1 rescue medication for symptom relief after receiving capsaicin or after administration of the first agent in patients who did not receive capsaicin during their ED course. Secondary outcomes included total ED length of stay, time to discharge after administration of the reference agent (RA), proportion of patients requiring admission, total number of medication doses given for symptom relief, change in pain score and episodes of emesis, and proportion of patients returning to the ED within 24 h for the same complaint. Additional analyses were also performed to explore patient characteristics that may be predictive of capsaicin efficacy.

RESULTS

201 patients were included in the final analysis of which 25 were <21 years old and seen in the pediatric ED. A greater proportion of patients in the capsaicin group achieved the primary outcome of efficacy as compared to patients who did not receive capsaicin (55% vs 21%, p < 0.001, unadjusted OR 1.44 [95% CI 0.586-0.820]). There were no differences in secondary outcomes except for time to discharge after administration of the RA which was shorter in the capsaicin group (3.72 vs 6.11 h, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Significantly more patients in the capsaicin group experienced efficacy compared to patients who did not. Time to discharge after administration of the reference agent was shorter for those who received capsaicin compared to patients who did not. Administration of capsaicin did not influence patients' total number of medications received or total ED length of stay. Future research is needed to determine capsaicin's efficacy when utilized earlier in therapy, ideally upon initial diagnosis of CHS, and before additional adjunct medications are administered.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome in Pediatrics: An Emerging Problem

Cannabis use has been evolving in both recreational drug use and medicinal uses, in part due to the recent introduction of various strains and components. With increasing use, we have seen emergence of a hyperemesis syndrome called cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome characterized as intractable vomiting, nausea, and abdominal pain in the context of prolonged cannabinoid use. Although the antiemetic properties of cannabis have been known for years, the paradoxical effect of hyperemesis has yet to be elucidated. Herein we discuss the current research, epidemiology, and diagnosis and treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. Without timely diagnosis and treatment, patients may experience significant physical and emotional distress, as well as place unnecessary financial burden on the medical system.

Treatment of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis With Olanzapine: A Case Series

The use and availability of cannabis for recreational and medical purposes has become more widespread with increased legalization. Adverse health outcomes of this increased use include cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS), which is underrecognized in medical settings. Cessation of substance use is the recommendation of choice for the complete resolution of CHS. However, interventions that provide rapid relief may be necessary in treatment-refractory cases. Little evidence is available to guide care in these cases. Here we report 4 cases of treatment-refractory CHS, all of which remitted after treatment with olanzapine. Olanzapine is known to block multiple neurotransmitter receptors involved in nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Outcomes of the cases reported here suggest that off-label use of olanzapine may be effective in the symptomatic treatment of refractory CHS and may be the preferred treatment in cases in which comorbid psychotic symptoms or agitation are present.

Use of Capsaicin Cream in Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is characterized by cyclical nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain often relieved with hot showers. Patients with CHS are usually long-term cannabis smokers whose symptoms are not relieved by antiemetics. The use of topical capsaicin has been recently reported as an adjunctive therapy in the emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of capsaicin cream in patients presenting to the ED with suspected CHS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with suspected CHS receiving capsaicin in an ED from July 2014 to October 2018. We report data on demographics, cannabis consumption, hot showers use, length of stay, concurrent treatments, pain scores, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 57 patients who received capsaicin cream for suspected CHS. Nearly all patients received antiemetics (98%), whereas 47% of patients received an opioid. Antiemetics were typically administered first (median, 1.6 hours; interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-2.4]), followed by an opioid (median, 1.8 hours [IQR, 1-3.75]), followed by capsaicin cream (median 4 hours [IQR, 2.7-5.2]). The overall precapsaicin pain score was 8 (IQR, 2-9), decreasing to 5.5 (IQR, 0-8). Around 42% of patients received no further symptomatic therapy after capsaicin. No adverse drug events to capsaicin were reported.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This is the largest retrospective study describing capsaicin cream use in suspected CHS patients with a focus on abdominal pain relief. Capsaicin treatment was associated with a modest pain score reduction. Application of these findings may help providers in identifying more effective therapies to provide symptomatic relief for CHS patients.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: A Review of the Presentation and Treatment

After the increasing legalization of cannabis, there has been a rising trend in cannabis consumption, especially among heavy users. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is a syndrome of cyclic vomiting related to chronic cannabis use. The difficulty of diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome has led to a disproportionately high use of health care resources. Although the exact mechanism of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is still unknown, patients typically progress through prodromal, hyperemetic, and recovery phases. Persistent vomiting in a patient who reports relief with hot showers should trigger the consideration of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome as a possible diagnosis. For treatment, antipsychotics such as haloperidol or droperidol have been shown to be more effective than conventional antiemetics for symptom control. Capsaicin should also be considered, given its positive efficacy and low adverse-effect profile. Providers must be aware of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, its diagnosis, and treatment, given the increasing prevalence. Further research is required to elicit the exact mechanism and additional therapies for this syndrome.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: A Case Study in a Tunisian Young Man

The increasing prevalence of cannabis use in the world requires awareness of cannabis-related disorders such as cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. This syndrome includes cyclic episodes of nausea, vomiting, and the learned behavior of hot bathing in individuals with chronic cannabis use. We present the case of a suspected cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome that required a review of the literature to retain the diagnosis. The following case illustrates how cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome awareness may lead to the diagnosis.

Efficacy of topical capsaicin for the treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) is a clinical disorder characterized by abdominal pain and intractable vomiting among patients with chronic marijuana use. We sought to assess the efficacy of capsaicin to determine whether it could reduce ED length of stay in patients with CHS.

METHODS

his retrospective observational study was conducted among patients with CHS. Patients were classified based on whether they received capsaicin, which was pseudorandomized and dependent on the pharmacist available. Outcomes included time to discharge, number of medications given, bounceback rate, and admission rate. Statistical analyses included t-tests, survival analyses, and cox regressions.

RESULTS

55 patients (35 capsaicin, 20 no capsaicin) met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in time to discharge between the experimental and control groups (4.46 h vs 3.52 h, p = 0.10), rounds of medications given (2.60 vs 3.54, p = 0.09), bounceback rate within 24 h (0.11 vs 0.10, p = 0.43), or admission rate to the hospital (0.19 vs 0.05, p = 0.07). A survival analysis and cox regression showed no difference in time to discharge. A subgroup analysis between patients who received capsaicin within their first two rounds of treatment had statistically significantly shorter length of stays than patients who received capsaicin afterwards, (4.83 h vs 7.09 h, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Topical capsaicin was not associated with shorter length of stays than no capsaicin. When given earlier during an ED visit, it is associated with a shorter length of stay than when given later.

Pediatric Cannabinoid Hyperemesis: A Single Institution 10-Year Case Series

PURPOSE

Cannabis hyperemesis (CH) is an under-recognized condition in patients with chronic or cyclic vomiting and who regularly use cannabis. Once thought to be rare, it is now increasingly recognized in both adults and children. We report a case series of adolescent patients with CH who presented at a single institution over 10 years.

METHODS

Patients were included if they had a diagnosis code of cannabis-related or cyclic vomiting, experienced the onset of regular vomiting after starting to regularly use cannabis, and if no other diagnosis was found to better explain the presentation. Thirty-four patients aged 13-20 years (median 17 years) met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The presenting clinical features were broadly similar to adult CH: cyclic nausea and emesis after at least 3 months of regular cannabis use, abdominal pain, change in bowel habit, and symptomatic relief from hot showers or baths. No antiemetic was found to be of particular benefit. Follow-up was recorded in under half of the patients; documentation of drug history was also frequently incomplete. Clinicians should consider CH when assessing any adolescent with cyclic or chronic vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

A detailed drug history, preferably taken in the absence of parents or other involved adults and corroborated by urine drug screening, is helpful in substantiating the diagnosis. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the incidence, prevalence, presenting features, and the effectiveness of treatments, including drug counseling and cessation. Based on our findings, we propose pragmatic criteria to aid in the diagnosis of pediatric CH.

Antinociception mechanisms of action of cannabinoid-based medicine: an overview for anesthesiologists and pain physicians

Cannabinoid-based medications possess unique multimodal analgesic mechanisms of action, modulating diverse pain targets. Cannabinoids are classified based on their origin into three categories: endocannabinoids (present endogenously in human tissues), phytocannabinoids (plant derived) and synthetic cannabinoids (pharmaceutical). Cannabinoids exert an analgesic effect, peculiarly in hyperalgesia, neuropathic pain and inflammatory states. Endocannabinoids are released on demand from postsynaptic terminals and travels retrograde to stimulate cannabinoids receptors on presynaptic terminals, inhibiting the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Cannabinoids (endogenous and phytocannabinoids) produce analgesia by interacting with cannabinoids receptors type 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2), as well as putative non-CB1/CB2 receptors; G protein-coupled receptor 55, and transient receptor potential vanilloid type-1. Moreover, they modulate multiple peripheral, spinal and supraspinal nociception pathways. Cannabinoids-opioids cross-modulation and synergy contribute significantly to tolerance and antinociceptive effects of cannabinoids. This narrative review evaluates cannabinoids' diverse mechanisms of action as it pertains to nociception modulation relevant to the practice of anesthesiologists and pain medicine physicians.

Cannabis in Gastroenterology: Watch Your Head! A Review of Use in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Functional Gut Disorders, and Gut-Related Adverse Effects

Purpose of review

To review recent clinical evidence surrounding the use of cannabinoids and cannabis in gastrointestinal diseases, particularly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and functional gut disorders. A second aim is to evaluate the current status of gastrointestinal related adverse effects which have been linked to cannabis use, specifically cannabis hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) and acute pancreatitis.

Recent findings

Observational and prospective studies suggest that cannabinoids improve IBD symptoms. Small prospective clinical trials have not shown any effects on objective inflammatory findings, other than one recent paper in ulcerative colitis, in abstract form only, which suggests endoscopic improvement. Short duration mechanistic studies in functional gut disorders suggest cannabinoids may attenuate gastric emptying and slow colonic motility but appear to have less effect on sensory thresholds in the gut.

Summary

In general, while mostly uncontrolled data suggests cannabis may improve symptoms in IBD (and to a lesser degree functional gut disorders), this is not likely due to any substantial anti-inflammatory effect. Much remains unknown about CHS etiology and complete abstinence from cannabinoids remains the generally accepted treatment strategy. Population-based studies do not suggest that cannabis use is related to acute pancreatitis. Further research is certainly warranted.

[Cannabinoid hyperemesis as a differential diagnosis of nausea and vomiting in the emergency department]

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is caused by regular cannabis consumption and marked by cyclic episodes of severe emesis, often years after the beginning of cannabis consumption. Classical antiemetic treatment often shows no effect and fatal outcomes have sometimes also been reported. This article describe the case of a young man in whom the diagnosis was made after four presentations due to the typical anamnesis. At this point in time he had already undergone an abdominal computed tomography (CT) and gastroscopy, both with no pathological findings. The symptoms completely receded 6 months after presentation by maintaining cannabis abstinence.

Management of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Focus on Capsaicin

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is a condition characterized by cyclic severe nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain associated with frequent, long-term marijuana use. The condition resolves with cessation of cannabis but may be temporarily relieved by bathing in hot water. Topical capsaicin cream may also alleviate symptoms, perhaps through antiemetic effects produced by activation of TRPV1 receptors, similar to that of hot water bathing. This review summarizes the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, focusing on treatment with topical capsaicin.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in two French emergency departments: a prospective cohort

Chronic cannabis use can be associated with uncontrollable vomiting and abdominal pain. Diagnostic criteria for cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) were defined in 2012 by Simonetto et al. The objectives of this study were to describe the prevalence of CHS, the patients' epidemiological characteristics, and to show the difficulties encountered in caring for these patients in emergency departments, the extent of health care and an unsuitable follow-up in general practices. A prospective cohort of patients with CHS was recruited among a target population of patients leaving the adult emergency services of the Marseille hospitals Nord and La Timone between October 2017 and July 2018, with abdominal pain syndrome of unidentified etiology. Inclusion criteria for the CHS cohort were chronic cannabis use associated with nausea and vomiting. There were 48 patients included in the CHS cohort who took cannabis daily, in a target population of 2 848 patients (i.e. 1.6%). A hot shower was the most effective symptomatic treatment in 54.2% of cases. Patients suffering from CHS spent significantly more hours in emergency departments (11 vs. 6.5), and, on average, visits were more frequent (4.9 vs. 3). 20.3% of them were hospitalized to continue pain medication. Once out of hospital, follow-up was limited, and weaning off cannabis, the only etiological treatment, was difficult to set up. Informing patients about CHS is essential, and a hot shower could be systematically proposed, thus limiting an unnecessary extent of health care. CHS is genuine, medical staff should be made aware of it in occupational training, and it should be seriously considered in health policies.

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is characterized by severe cyclical nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain relieved by compulsive hot water bathing in the setting of chronic cannabinoid use. This article reviews the characteristics, proposed pathophysiology, treatment modalities, and role of nurses caring for patients with CHS.

Efficacy and safety of topical capsaicin for cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in the emergency department

Introduction: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a disorder of cyclic and recurrent nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain associated with high-frequency and extended-duration marijuana use. Standard antiemetic therapy is often ineffective; however, capsaicin, an agonist of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), has shown promise in treating CHS.Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of topical capsaicin for patients presenting with CHS. The primary outcome was to assess if utilization of capsaicin for ED management of CHS decreased ED length of stay (LOS) as compared to a visit without capsaicin. Secondary outcomes included a cost analysis, use of rescue therapies, and adverse events.Results: Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria within the study period. ED LOS was reduced with capsaicin by a median of 22 minutes (201 vs. 179 min, p = 0.33). Patients received fewer additional medications if capsaicin was utilized (4 vs. 3 doses, p = 0.015), and 67% of visits where capsaicin was utilized required no further treatment prior to discharge. Additionally, opioid usage was less when utilizing capsaicin (166.5 vs. 69 mg OME). Forty-two percent of patients did not have a repeat CHS presentation to the ED after receiving capsaicin for an additional three months after the study period ended. Total medication cost was minimally more expensive (median difference of $3.26) in the capsaicin group. There were no significant adverse events reported with capsaicin.Conclusion: There was no significant difference in ED LOS when capsaicin was utilized for CHS. However, there was a decrease in total medications administered and a reduction in opioid requirements. While medication costs for capsaicin visits were minimally more expensive, the utility of capsaicin as an over-the-counter (OTC) product may empower at home therapy with OTC products, decreasing potentially unnecessary healthcare encounters and costs.

What Every Pediatric Gynecologist Should Know About Marijuana Use in Adolescents

Use of marijuana in adolescent girls is common and shows no sign of decreasing. With recent trends toward legalization of "recreational" and "medical" marijuana products, adolescents are increasingly faced with information and misinformation about the health effects of marijuana use. We review the current literature on the risks and potential benefits of marijuana use during adolescence with a specific focus on pediatric and adolescent gynecological conditions. Despite limited research on this topic, the many risks associated with marijuana use in adolescents, including negative effects on the developing brain and adverse reproductive, sexual health, and mental health outcomes, likely outweigh potential benefits in this population.

Legalized Cannabis in Colorado Emergency Departments: A Cautionary Review of Negative Health and Safety Effects

Cannabis legalization has led to significant health consequences, particularly to patients in emergency departments and hospitals in Colorado. The most concerning include psychosis, suicide, and other substance abuse. Deleterious effects on the brain include decrements in complex decision-making, which may not be reversible with abstinence. Increases in fatal motor vehicle collisions, adverse effects on cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, inadvertent pediatric exposures, cannabis contaminants exposing users to infectious agents, heavy metals, and pesticides, and hash-oil burn injuries in preparation of drug concentrates have been documented. Cannabis dispensary workers (“budtenders”) without medical training are giving medical advice that may be harmful to patients. Cannabis research may offer novel treatment of seizures, spasticity from multiple sclerosis, nausea and vomiting from chemotherapy, chronic pain, improvements in cardiovascular outcomes, and sleep disorders. Progress has been slow due to absent standards for chemical composition of cannabis products and limitations on research imposed by federal classification of cannabis as illegal. Given these factors and the Colorado experience, other states should carefully evaluate whether and how to decriminalize or legalize non-medical cannabis use.

Cannabis-related emergencies in children and teens

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the spectrum of emergency department presentations associated with cannabis use or misuse that are currently seen in the pediatric population.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a growing concern that pediatric emergency department visits related to cannabis are on the rise, especially given rapidly changing legislation on cannabis and its broad availability in certain areas. These concerns are substantiated in the current literature, as the evidence mounts for an array of emergency department presentations of intentional or accidental cannabis use. The range of presentations documented in the recent literature spans gastrointestinal, psychiatric and cardiorespiratory effects, in addition to traumatic injuries and accidental ingestions by younger children. Complications of chronic cannabis use, such as 'cannabis hyperemesis syndrome', depression, psychosis or cognitive impairment, are now recognized outcomes and even more are likely to emerge.

SUMMARY

An array of cannabis-related symptoms is possible from acute use or exposure. Common presentations include acute intoxication, hyperemesis, depression and acute physical injuries from impaired psychomotor function. Uncommon presentations include cardiorespiratory effects, and a range of symptoms in young children that include hyperkinesis and coma. Clinical vigilance is needed to suspect and clinically diagnose cannabis exposure in the emergency department.

Emergent Medical Illnesses Related to Cannabis Use

As more states rush to legalize the use of cannabis products, both medically and recreationally, there are more medical harms being seen in emergency departments (ED). The tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration today is much stronger than the concentration from the 90s. In the 1990s most typical "joints" contained 1-3 mg of THC. Today, plants are being raised and modified to produce a higher concentration of THC. In turn, the amount of cannabidiol (CBD) is decreasing. Previously, people would smoke 1-3 mg of THC. The typical joint in Colorado contains 18 mg of THC or more. Currently, in the ED, we see patients who self-report smoking 2,000 mg or more of THC in a day. In 2015, 2.6 million individuals started cannabis use, 45% were 12-17 years of age.3 This brief report includes some of the more common illnesses that have been seen over the last four years of legalization in Colorado, and is by no means inclusive of all the potential problems that can occur. Among the many untoward effects being seen, illnesses that will be discussed are: cannabinoid associated hyperemesis, acute psychosis, cannabinoid catatonia syndrome, acute myo-pericarditis and ingestions.

Emergency Department and Radiological Cost of Delayed Diagnosis of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis

Background. Chronic cannabis use has become prevalent with decriminalization, medical prescription, and recreational legalization in numerous US states. With this increasing incidence of chronic cannabis use a new clinical syndrome has become apparent in emergency departments and hospitals across the country, termed Cannabinoid Hyperemesis (CH). CH has been described as cyclical vomiting and abdominal pain in the setting of chronic cannabis use, which is often temporarily relieved by hot showers. CH presents a diagnostic challenge to clinicians who do not have a high clinical suspicion for the syndrome and can result in high costs and resource utilization for hospitals and patients. This study investigates the expenditures associated with delayed CH evaluation and delayed diagnosis. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study of 17 patients diagnosed with CH at three medical centers in the United States from 2010 to 2015, consisting of two academic centers and a community hospital. Emergency department (ED) costs were calculated and analyzed for patients eventually diagnosed with CH. Results. For the 17 patients treated, the total cost for combined ED visits and radiologic evaluations was an average of $76,920.92 per patient. On average these patients had 17.9 ED visits before the diagnosis of CH was made. Conclusion. CH provides a diagnostic challenge to clinicians without a high suspicion of the syndrome and may become increasingly prevalent with current trends toward cannabis legalization. The diagnosis of CH can be made primarily through a thorough history and physical examination. Awareness of this syndrome can save institutions money, prevent inappropriate utilization of healthcare resources, and save patients from unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a paradoxical condition in which a long-term cannabis user suffers an episode of intractable vomiting that may last days separated by longer asymptomatic periods of weeks or months. Cannabinoids are often utilized for their antiemetic properties, so CHS can be a puzzling condition, and the diagnosis of CHS may be disputed by patients. Unlike other cyclic vomiting syndromes, CHS can be relieved by hot showers or topical capsaicin. Abstinence from cannabinoids causes CHS to resolve, sometimes in a matter of days or hours. Marijuana users as well as many clinicians are not aware of CHS, and patients may undergo unnecessary tests, scans, and other procedures to get an accurate diagnosis. Symptoms may be severe enough to require hospitalization. With liberalization of marijuana laws and favorable public opinion about the healing properties of cannabis, CHS may be more frequently observed in clinical practice.