Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Nonradiotherapeutic Ablative Procedures (Laser/Cryoablation and Electrocautery) for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment strategies for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A SEER-based population study

BACKGROUND

There are various therapeutic methods for treating stage IA (T1N0M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but no studies have systematically assessed multiple treatments to determine the most effective therapy.

METHODS

Stage IA NSCLC patient data collected between 2004 and 2018 were gathered from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Treatment modalities included observation, chemotherapy alone (CA), radiation alone (RA), radiation+chemotherapy (RC), surgery alone (SA), surgery+chemotherapy (SC), surgery+radiation (SR) and surgery+radiation+chemotherapy (SRC). Comparisons were made of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) among patients based on different therapeutic methods by survival analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 89147 patients with stage IA NSCLC between 2004 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. The order of multiple treatment modalities based on the hazard ratio (HR) for OS for the entire cohort revealed the following results: SA (HR: 0.20), SC (HR: 0.25), SR (HR: 0.42), SRC (HR: 0.46), RA (HR: 0.56), RC (HR: 0.72), CA (HR: 0.91) (P<0.001), and observation (HR: Ref). The SA group had the best OS and LCSS, and similar results were found in most subgroup analyses (all P<0.001). The order of surgical modalities based on the HR for OS for the entire cohort revealed the following results: lobectomy (HR: 0.32), segmentectomy (HR: 0.41), wedge resection (HR: 0.52) and local tumor destruction (HR: Ref). Lobectomy had the best effects on OS and LCSS, and similar results were found in all subgroup analyses (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

SA appeared to be the optimal treatment modality for patients with stage IA NSCLC, and lobectomy was associated with the best prognosis. There may be some indication and selection bias in our study, and the results of this study should be confirmed in a prospective study.

Safety and Effectiveness of Track Cauterization for Lung Cryoablation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of track cauterization for lung cryoablation through comparison of postprocedural adverse event (AE) rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients who underwent 164 percutaneous lung cryoablation procedures between 2013 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. The study cohort was subdivided by whether track cauterization was conducted or not at the end of the procedure. The study cohort was also subdivided by the number of probes (1-2 probes vs 3-4 probes). Postablation AE rates were assessed by immediate and delayed (at 1 month or later) AEs, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pleural effusion, and whether intervention was required. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare differences in AE rates.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent procedures with track cautery were 2.6 times less likely to exhibit pleural effusion (P = .017). Patients who underwent procedures conducted with a higher number of probes were 3.8 times more likely to receive interventions (P < .001), 1.6 times more likely to experience pneumothorax (P = .037), and 2.1 times more likely to experience pleural effusion (P = .003). History of lung surgery, increased number of probes, size of the probe, and absence of track cautery were noted to be significant predictors of AEs and need for interventions (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Track cauterization in lung cryoablation was proven to reduce pleural effusion, but no difference in pneumothorax or delayed AEs was noted. The use of fewer probes was associated with a lower rate of AEs.

PET/CT-Based Radiogenomics Supports KEAP1/NFE2L2 Pathway Targeting for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Curative Radiotherapy

In lung cancer patients, radiotherapy is associated with a increased risk of local relapse (LR) when compared with surgery but with a preferable toxicity profile. The KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutational status (MutKEAP1/NFE2L2) is significantly correlated with LR in patients treated with radiotherapy but is rarely available. Prediction of MutKEAP1/NFE2L2 with noninvasive modalities could help to further personalize each therapeutic strategy. Methods: Based on a public cohort of 770 patients, model RNA (M-RNA) was first developed using continuous gene expression levels to predict MutKEAP1/NFE2L2, resulting in a binary output. The model PET/CT (M-PET/CT) was then built to predict M-RNA binary output using PET/CT-extracted radiomics features. M-PET/CT was validated on an external cohort of 151 patients treated with curative volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy. Each model was built, internally validated, and evaluated on a separate cohort using a multilayer perceptron network approach. Results: The M-RNA resulted in a C statistic of 0.82 in the testing cohort. With a training cohort of 101 patients, the retained M-PET/CT resulted in an area under the curve of 0.90 (P < 0.001). With a probability threshold of 20% applied to the testing cohort, M-PET/CT achieved a C statistic of 0.7. The same radiomics model was validated on the volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy cohort as patients were significantly stratified on the basis of their risk of LR with a hazard ratio of 2.61 (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Our approach enables the prediction of MutKEAP1/NFE2L2 using PET/CT-extracted radiomics features and efficiently classifies patients at risk of LR in an external cohort treated with radiotherapy.

Pulmonary Cryoablation Outcomes in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Primary Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To characterize the effectiveness, safety, and length of stay (LOS) associated with pulmonary cryoablation for management of primary lung malignancies in patients aged ≥80 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center database was compiled of all consecutive patients aged ≥80 years who underwent percutaneous computed tomography-guided cryoablation using modified triple-freeze protocol (1-3 ablation probes) for Stage IA-IIB primary lung malignancies between March 2017 and March 2020 (n = 19; 53% women; mean age, 85 years ± 3.5; range, 80-94 years). Follow-up imaging was assessed for local recurrence. Adverse events and LOS were recorded from chart review. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both overall and local recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

Mean patient follow-up period was 21.6 months ± 10.8, and mean imaging follow-up period was 19.2 months ± 9.6. Overall survival at 3 years was 94% (95% CI, 81%-100%). Local recurrence-free survival was 100% throughout the imaging follow-up period. Intraprocedural pneumothorax occurred in 37% (7 of 19) of patients; pneumothorax risk was significantly associated with increased tumor distance from pleura (odds ratio, 1.2; P = .018). Sixty-three percent (12 of 19) of patients were discharged on the day of the procedure, with a mean LOS of 7.7 hours ± 1.6, whereas 37% of patients required overnight observation (2 of 19) or admission (5 of 19), with a mean LOS of 48.1 hours ± 19.4. Overall LOS for all patients was 22.6 hours ± 22.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous cryoablation of primary pulmonary malignancies can be performed in select octogenarians and nonagenarians with high 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival. Despite nonnegligible risk of pneumothorax, most patients are discharged on the day of the procedure.

Image-Guided Percutaneous and Transarterial Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. A significant proportion of patients with lung cancer are not candidates for surgery and must resort to other treatment alternatives. Rapid technological advancements in fields like interventional radiology have paved the way for valid treatment modalities like image-guided percutaneous and transarterial therapies for treatment of both primary and metastatic lung cancer. The rationale of ablative therapies relies on the fact that focused delivery of energy induces tumor destruction and pathological necrosis. Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation therapies are established techniques in the local treatment of hepatic, renal, bone, thyroid, or uterine lesions. In the lung, the 3 main indications for lung ablation include local curative intent, a strategy to achieve a chemoholiday in oligometastatic disease, and recently, oligoprogressive disease. Transarterial therapies include a set of catheter-based treatments that involve delivering embolic and/or chemotherapeutic agents directed into the target tumor via the supplying arteries. This article provides a comprehensive review of the various techniques available and discusses their applications and associated complications in primary and metastatic lung cancer.

Cryoablation and immune synergistic effect for lung cancer: A review

The preferred treatment for lung cancer is surgical resection, but a large number of patients are not suitable for surgical resection in clinic. CT-guided cryoablation and immunotherapy can play an important role in patients with advanced lung cancer who are ineligible for surgery. CT-guided cryoablation has been widely used in the clinical treatment of lung tumors due to its advantages of less trauma, fewer complications, significant efficacy and rapid recovery. Cryoablation can not only cause tumor necrosis and apoptosis, but also promote the release of tumor-derived autoantigens into the blood circulation, and stimulate the host immune system to produce a good anti-tumor immune effect against primary and metastatic tumors. Since the study of immune checkpoint inhibitors has proved that lung cancer can be an immunotherapeutic response disease, the relationship between cryoablation and immunotherapy of lung cancer has been paid more attention. Therefore, we reviewed the literature on cryoablation for lung cancer, as well as the research progress of cryoablation combined with immunotherapy.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after SBRT or thermal ablation vs. resection is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

Short-term outcomes are meaningfully better after SBRT than resection. SBRT doesn't affect quality-of-life (QOL), on average pulmonary function is not altered, but a minority of patients may experience gradual late toxicity. Adjusted non-randomized comparisons demonstrate a clinically relevant detriment in long-term outcomes after SBRT vs. surgery. The short-term benefits of SBRT over surgery are accentuated with increasing age and compromised patients, but the long-term detriment remains. Ablation is associated with a higher rate of complications than SBRT, but there is little intermediate-term impact on quality-of-life or pulmonary function tests. Adjusted comparisons show a meaningful detriment in long-term outcomes after ablation vs. surgery; there is less difference between ablation and SBRT.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or thermal ablation vs. resection with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.

Patterns of Use of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Surgery for Definitive Treatment of Primary Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

As stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) becomes widely available for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there may be concerns in the surgical community that SBRT is being offered for patients with operable tumors, even though surgery is standard of care. We evaluated the trends in SBRT and surgery over time for patients with NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with node-negative NSCLC ≤5 cm from 2004 to 2016. The relationships between definitive local treatment modalities and year were analyzed using a multinomial regression model while controlling for other covariates.

RESULTS

Among the 202,367 patients who met the inclusion criteria, there was a steady decrease in mean tumor size in all treatment modalities, from 2.44 cm (SD=1.08) to 2.25 cm (SD=1.00) over the study period. In the multinomial model, the probability of receiving lobectomy demonstrated a slight decline from 58% (2004) to 53% (2016). The use of SBRT increased from 1% to 20%, while patients receiving no therapy declined from 27% to 16%. The likelihood of SBRT increased with year of diagnosis (P<0.0001) and decreasing tumor size (P<0.0001), compared with lobectomy. Age, race, income, facility, and Charlson-Deyo score were also associated with treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean tumor size of early-stage NSCLC decreased over the study period for all treatment modalities. SBRT use has increased, mostly among older patients with smaller tumors and Charlson-Deyo scores ≥3. The increase in SBRT contributed to the significant decline in patients who had no therapy.

Photodynamic therapy for stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: A SEER-Medicare analysis 2000-2016

ABSTRACT

We analyzed mortality (all-cause and lung cancer-specific) and time to follow-up treatment in stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT) compared with ablation therapy and radiation therapy.From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, patients diagnosed with stage I and II NSCLC between 2000 and 2015 were identified. Outcomes were mortality (overall and lung cancer-specific) and time to follow-up treatment. We analyzed mortality using Cox proportional hazard models. We used generalized linear model to assess time to follow-up treatment (PDT and ablation groups). Models were adjusted for inverse probability weighted propensity score.Of 495,441 NSCLC patients, 56 with stage I and II disease received PDT (mono or multi-modal), 477 received ablation (mono or multi-modal), and 14,178 received radiation therapy alone. None from PDT group had metastatic disease (M0) and 70% had no nodal involvement (N0). Compared with radiation therapy alone, PDT therapy was associated with lower hazard of overall (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.39-0.80), and lung cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.97). Unadjusted mean time to follow-up treatment was 70days (standard deviation = 146) for PDT group and 67 days (standard deviation = 174) for ablation group. Compared with ablation, PDT was associated with an average increase of 125days to follow-up treatment (P = .11).Among stage I and II NSCLC patients, PDT was associated with improved survival, compared with radiation alone; and longer time to follow-up treatment compared with ablation. Currently, PDT is offered in various combinations with surgery and radiation. Larger studies can investigate the efficacy and effectiveness of these combinations.

Microwave ablation treatment for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancers: long-term results

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we aim to show the results of microwave ablation (MWA) for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

From Feb 2011 to Mar 2016, patients with histologically proven clinical stage I NSCLC were treated with CT-guided MWA and retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with 105 lesions underwent MWA. The mean age was 70.7 years (range: 40-86 years), and the mean diameter of all lesions was 2.40 cm (range: 0.9-4.0 cm). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type (77, 73.3%), followed by squamous cell carcinomas (21, 20%) and undefined NSCLC (7, 6.7%). With a median follow-up of 54.8 months, the median DFS was 36.0 months, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 89.5%, 49.4%, and 42.7%, respectively. The median CSS and OS were 89.8 and 64.2 months, respectively. The OS rate was 99% at 1 year, 75.6% at 3 years, and 54.1% at 5 years, while the CSS rates were 99%, 78.9%, and 60.9%, respectively. Patients with stage IB lesions had significant shorter DFS (22.3 months vs. undefined, HR: 11.5, 95%CI: 5.85-22.40) and OS (37.3 vs. 89.8 months, HR: 8.64, 95% CI: 4.49-16.60) than IA disease.

CONCLUSION

MWA is a safe, effective, and potentially curative therapy for medically inoperable stage I NSCLC patients.

KEY POINTS

• In this multicenter retrospective study which included 105 patients, we found the median overall survival (OS) was 64.2 months. The OS rate was 99% at 1 year, 75.6% at 3 years, and 54.1% at 5 years. • Procedures were technically successful and well tolerated in all patients. Most MWA complications were mild or moderate.

Percutaneous Image-Guided Ablation of Lung Tumors

Tumors of the lung, including primary cancer and metastases, are notoriously common and difficult to treat. Although surgical resection of lung lesions is often indicated, many conditions disqualify patients from being surgical candidates. Percutaneous image-guided lung ablation is a relatively new set of techniques that offers a promising treatment option for a variety of lung tumors. Although there have been no clinical trials to definitively compare its efficacy to those of traditional treatments, lung ablation is widely practiced and generally accepted to be safe and effective. Especially encouraging results have recently emerged for cryoablation, one of the newer ablative techniques. This article reviews the indications, techniques, contraindications, and complications of percutaneous image-guided ablation of lung tumors with special attention to cryoablation and its recent developments in protocol optimization.

Stereotactic Radiation for Lung Cancer: A Practical Approach to Challenging Scenarios

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for medically inoperable patients with early stage NSCLC. SBRT is a noninvasive treatment involving the delivery of ablative radiation doses with high precision in the course of a few treatments. Relative to conventionally fractionated radiation, SBRT achieves superior local control and survival. SBRT use has increased dramatically in the past 15 years and is currently considered the standard of care in cases of inoperable early stage NSCLC. It is being increasingly applied to more complex patient populations at higher risk of treatment-related toxicity. In these more complex patients, there is an increasing need to balance patient and treatment factors in selecting the optimal patients for SBRT. Here, we review several challenging clinical scenarios often encountered in thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Alternatives to Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Thermal Ablation

Thermal ablation involves the application of heat or cold energy to the lung under image guidance to eradicate tumors. It is indicated for treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in nonsurgical patients. Ablation technologies have advanced, such that nearly all small tumors can now be treated safely and effectively. Ablation does not cause a lasting decline in pulmonary function tests and may therefore be used to treat multiple synchronous and metachronous lung tumors, a chief advantage over other treatments. Large series with intermediate- and long-term data have been reported showing favorable overall survival, similar to radiation therapy.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy: Passing fad or revolution?]

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a young technology that can deliver a high dose of radiation to the target, utilizing either a single dose or a small number of fractions with a high degree of precision within the body. Various technical solutions co-exist nowadays, with particular features, possibilities and limitations. Health care authorities have currently validated SBRT in a very limited number of locations, but many indications are still under investigation. It is therefore challenging to accurately appreciate the SBRT therapeutic index, its place and its role within the anticancer therapeutic arsenal. The aim of the present review is to provide SBRT definitions, current indications, and summarize the future ways of research. There are three validated indications for SBRT: un-resecable T1-T2 non small cell lung cancer, <3 slow-growing pulmonary metastases secondary to a stabilized primary, and the tumours located close to the medulla. In other situations, the benefit of SBRT is still to be demonstrated. One of the most promising way of research is the ablative treatment of oligo metastatic cancers, with recent studies suggesting a survival benefit. Furthermore, the most recent data suggest that SBRT is safe. Finally, the SBRT combined with immune therapies is promising, since it could theoretically trigger the adaptative anticancer response.