Effects of perioperative Eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched oral nutritional supplement on lean body mass after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Effects of high-protein supplementation during cancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Establishing the effectiveness of high-protein supplementation in reducing cancer-related side effects is crucial.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of high-protein supplementation on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cancer therapy.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from inception until July 2023. Randomized controlled trials administering supplements with ≥10 g protein/serving, given to 20+ adult patients undergoing cancer therapy were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the effects of high-protein supplementation on the primary outcomes of body weight and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We employed a vote-counting approach based on effect direction for secondary outcomes (that is, body composition, muscle function, hospitalization, response to cancer therapy/toxicity, survival, and systemic inflammation). Risk-of-bias (ROB) was assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies involving 3701 patients with diverse cancer types were included. Patients who received high-protein supplementation lost less body weight than controls (mean difference = 1.45 kg; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.48 kg; P = 0.006; I2 = 80%). No differences in HRQoL were observed; all studies assessing HRQoL were rated as high ROB. A beneficial effect on muscle mass was found in 11 of 13 studies, although most had a high ROB due to assessment techniques. When considering higher quality studies, evidence of a beneficial effect was found in 5 of 5 studies for muscle strength, and 3 of 4 for hospitalization rate. Effects on other secondary outcomes were inconsistent or limited. No serious adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

High-protein supplementation mitigates weight loss, improves muscle strength, and lowers hospitalization rates in patients undergoing cancer therapy. These positive clinical outcomes, along with a favorable safety profile, suggest that high-protein supplementation may be a valuable addition to medical practice. However, given the need for more robust trials and the high ROB observed in the existing studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021237372.

Comparison of the Dietary Intake After Gastrectomy Between Male and Female Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to investigate the differences in the postoperative dietary intake (DI) loss between men and women after radical resection for early gastric cancer (GC), and to identify effective nutritional support for both sexes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational study enrolled patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC. DI was assessed using the food frequency questionnaire containing 82 food items (FFQW82) during nutritional counseling before surgery and one and three months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The median preoperative DI of all participants was 1,856.3 kcal/day, and DI at 1 and 3 months were 1,532.5 kcal/day and 1,637 kcal/day, respectively. The median preoperative DI was 1805 kcal/day (1,300-2,330 kcal/day) and 1481 kcal/day (1,126-1,957 kcal/day) in men and women, respectively (p<0.0001). The median DI at 1 month was 1627 (1,101-2,195) kcal/day and 1,308 (986-1,915) kcal/day in men and women, respectively (p<0.0001). At 3 months postoperatively, the median DI was 1737 (1,130-2,443) kcal/day in men and 1428 (816-2,005) kcal/day in women (p<0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the DI loss rate at 1 month (median: -9.7% vs. -9.3%, p=0.765) and 3 months (median: -3.5% vs. -4.8%, p=0.137) between men and women.

CONCLUSION

Although the DI loss rate in men and women after gastrectomy for GC was almost similar, the postoperative DI and DI loss differed significantly. Therefore, differences in DI loss after gastrectomy between men and women should be considered while assessing the efficacy of additional nutritional support such as oral nutritional supplements after gastrectomy.

Dose-Dependent Impacts of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on Anthropometric Variables in Patients With Cancer: Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Meta-analyses have been conducted with conflicting results on this topic. Due to missing several eligible studies in previous meta-analysis by Lam et al., we conducted an extensive systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in this regard. A comprehensive search was conducted across various databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and Google Scholar, until November 2023. Based on the analysis of 33 studies comprising 2,047 individuals, it was found that there was a significant increase in body weight for each 1 g/day increase in omega-3 lipids (standardized MD [SMD], 0.52 kg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31, 0.73; I2 = 95%; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE] = low). Supplementation of omega-3 fatty acids did not yield a statistically significant impact on body mass index (BMI) (SMD, 0.12 kg/m2; 95% CI, -0.02, 0.27; I2 = 79%; GRADE = very low), lean body mass (LBM) (SMD, -0.02 kg; 95% CI, -0.43, 0.39; I2 = 97%; GRADE = very low), fat mass (SMD, 0.45 kg; 95% CI, -0.25, 1.15; I2 = 96%; GRADE = low), and body fat (SMD, 0.30%; 95% CI, -0.90, 1.51; I2 = 96%; GRADE = very low). After excluding 2 studies, the findings were significant for BMI. Regarding the results of the dose-response analysis, body weight increased proportionally by increasing the dose of omega-3 supplementation up to 4 g/day. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation can improve body weight, but not BMI, LBM, fat mass, or body fat in cancer patients; large-scale randomized trials needed for more reliable results.

Trial Registration

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023395341.

Pharmaconutrition: Which substrates?

With the term "pharmaconutrition" or "immunonutrition" is intended the use of specific nutritional substrates having the ability of modulating specific mechanisms involved in several immune and inflammatory pathways. To achieve these goals, these substrates have to be administered with over physiologic dose. Glutamine and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, used as single substrate, did not show clear clinical advantages on solid endpoints such as postoperative complications. Despite several multiple substrate enteral feeds are available on the market, very few of them have been tested in randomized clinical trial to prove efficacy. The most extensive investigated formulation is a combination of arginine, omega-3 fatty acids, ribonucleic acid with or without glutamine. Several meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials have been conducted to compare the effects of enteral immunonutrition with control diets on post-surgical morbidity. The results consistently showed that the use of enteral multiple substrate formulas significantly reduced infectious complications and duration of hospitalization. In a more contemporary view, pharmaconutrition should be tested more accurately in the contest of enhanced recovery programs, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in the prehabilitation setting.

Effects of postoperative oral elemental nutritional supplement on skeletal muscle loss after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We previously showed that daily nutritional intervention with an oral elemental diet (ED) at 300 kcal/day for 6-8 weeks postoperatively decreased the percentage of body weight loss (%BWL), and that the effect was maintained for 1 year. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether this intervention decreased skeletal muscle mass loss 1-year post-gastrectomy.

METHODS

Data from consecutive, untreated patients with histopathologically confirmed stage I-III gastric adenocarcinoma who planned to undergo total gastrectomy (TG) or distal gastrectomy (DG) and were enrolled in a previously published randomized trial were used. The primary endpoint was the percentage of skeletal muscle mass index (%SMI) loss from baseline at 1 year postoperatively, based on abdominal computed tomography images obtained preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The overall median %SMI loss was lower in the ED versus control group, but the difference was not significant. The difference in %SMI loss in the ED and control groups was greater in patients with TG (10.1 vs. 13.0; P = 0.12) than in those with DG (5.5 vs. 6.8; P = 0.69). A correlation was observed between %BWL and %SMI loss in both groups (ED group, coefficient 0.591; control group, coefficient 0.644; P < 0.001 for both). Type of gastrectomy (coefficient 7.38; P = 0.001) and disease stage (coefficient - 6.43; P = 0.04) were independent predictors of postoperative skeletal muscle mass loss.

CONCLUSION

ED administration for 6-8 weeks following gastrectomy had no inhibitory effect on skeletal muscle loss at 1 year postoperatively.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000023455.

Efficacy of Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) Containing Protein Supplement in Preventing Weight Loss in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Radiotherapy: Retrospective Observations with Historical Controls

Weight loss is a major issue in Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing curative radiotherapy. The principal objective of the study was to observe whether eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) containing protein supplement was effective in mitigating the weight loss during in hospitalized HNC undergoing curative radiotherapy. A retrospective study was performed based on clinical, treatment and nutritional data of 53 patients received EPA containing supplement during their curative radiotherapy from October 2014 to January 2015 and was compared with 88 historical control group of patients (October 2013 to June 2014) who had indigenous protein rich diet planned by the dietician in the period immediately before the implementation of providing EPA containing protein supplement to the patients. The data was stratified based on gender, age, weight, treatment modalities, stage and site of cancer and analysed using unpaired t test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. The results indicate there was no significant difference in the patient tumor and clinical details. The results indicate that the percent change in weight loss was less in the EPA cohorts when calculated from weight (P < 0.006) and Body Mass Index (BMI) perspective (P < 0.003). Detail analysis suggested that beneficial effects were more in males (P < 0.01), people affected with oral cancer (P < 0.02), people below the age of 40 (P < 0.001), and in people with early stage cancer (P < 0.003). Cumulatively all these results suggest that administering EPA containing protein supplement was effective in arresting weight loss in HNC patients undergoing curative radiotherapy.

Adherence to Oral Nutrition Supplementation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The prevalence of malnutrition is high in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. The use of oral nutrition supplementation (ONS) as part of patients' nutritional therapy seems to be effective in the improvement of nutritional status. Nevertheless, oncology patients, experience several symptoms that negatively affect their compliance with ONS products. Τhe aim of this systematic review is to examine the factors affecting compliance with ONS in patients who underwent GI cancer surgery and/or adjuvant treatments. A systematic search was conducted to identify studies published until June 2023 that assessed compliance to ONS in GI cancer patients. Eleven studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Postoperative compliance with ONS among GI cancer surgery patients ranged between 26.2% and 71.1%, whereas in GI cancer patients receiving chemotherapy the average reported rate was 90.2%. The main reasons for noncompliance were the presence of GI symptoms, such as early satiety, bloating, and diarrhea after ONS consumption, as well as taste alterations that result in aversion to the provided ONS. Frequent monitoring of these patients is crucial in order to record adverse effects, identify patients that are in need of personalized guidance at an early stage and motivate them to follow their ONS plan.

Synergistic Strategies for Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: Unveiling the Benefits of Immunonutrition and Microbiota Modulation

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of highly prevalent malignant tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Globally, one in four cancer cases and one in three cancer deaths are estimated to be GI cancers. They can alter digestive and absorption functions, leading to severe malnutrition which may worsen the prognosis of the patients. Therefore, nutritional intervention and monitoring play a fundamental role in managing metabolic alterations and cancer symptoms, as well as minimizing side effects and increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In this scenario, the use of immunonutrients that are able to modulate the immune system and the modification/regulation of the gut microbiota composition have gained attention as a possible strategy to improve the conditions of these patients. The complex interaction between nutrients and microbiota might contribute to maintaining the homeostasis of each individual's immune system; therefore, concurrent use of specific nutrients in combination with traditional cancer treatments may synergistically improve the overall care of GI cancer patients. This work aims to review and discuss the role of immunonutrition and microbiota modulation in improving nutritional status, postoperative recovery, and response to therapies in patients with GI cancer.

Oral Nutritional Supplements Reduce Body Weight Loss after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) on body weight loss (BWL) after gastrectomy. A systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases through May 2023. The study inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies on interventions including ONSs after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer; (2) studies in which comparisons were specified according to standard, regular, or usual postoperative diets; and (3) randomized controlled trial studies including outcomes measured as mean differences in BWL. The data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on data from seven studies including 1743 patients (891 for ONSs and 852 for the control), the overall pooled mean difference was 0.848 (95% CI: 0.466 to 1.230) and the Higgins I2 value was 86.0%. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first study to show that ONSs are significantly associated with reducing BWL, compared with standard diets, after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Furthermore, we found that ONSs were more effective in patients with lower nutritional kilocalorie intake after gastrectomy.

Monitoring the effect of perioperative nutritional care on body composition and functional status in patients with carcinoma of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system and pancreas

BACKGROUND

The significance of nutritional care in the management of cancer, particularly in the surgical treatment of abdominal cancer, is increasingly acknowledged. Body composition analysis, such as the Bioelectric impedance assay (BIA), and functional tests, e.g., handgrip strength, are used when assessing nutritional status alongside general and nutritional history, clinical examination, and laboratory tests. The primary approach in nutritional care is individually adjusted nutritional counselling and the use of medical nutrition, especially oral nutritional supplements. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of perioperative nutritional care on body composition and functional status in patients with carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract, hepatobiliary system, and pancreas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

47 patients were included, 27 received preoperative and postoperative nutritional counselling and oral nutritional supplements (Group 1), while 20, due to surgical or organisational reasons, received nutritional care only postoperatively (Group 2). The effect of nutritional therapy was measured with bioimpedance body composition and handgrip measurements.

RESULTS

Group 2 had a higher average Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 score upon enrolment (3 vs. 2 points); however, there was no difference when malnutrition was assessed using Global Leadership in Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. There was a relative increase in lean body mass and fat-free mass index (FFMI) 7 days after surgery in group 1 (+4,2% vs. -2,1% in group 2). There was no difference in handgrip strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that combined preoperative and postoperative nutritional care is superior to only postoperative nutritional care. It seems to prevent statistically significant lean mass loss 7 days after surgery but not after 14 days or 4 weeks.

Synthesis of eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched medium- and long-chain triglyceride by lipase-catalyzed transesterification: a novel strategy for clinical nutrition intervention

BACKGROUND

Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) has been recognized as a promising nutrient to improve therapeutic efficacy for cancer patients. Nevertheless, there are certain limitations to the application of EPA due to its structural characteristics. To maximize the nutritive value of EPA, a type of medium- and long-chain triacylglycerol (MLCT) enriched with EPA was designed and synthesized using the lipase-catalyzed transesterification of medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) and EPA-enriched fish oil (FO).

RESULTS

The optimum synthesis conditions for EPA-enriched MLCT used Lipozyme RM as catalyst, and had a substrate mass ratio (MCT/EPA-enriched FO) of 3:1, lipase loading of 80 g kg^-1 , a reaction temperature of 60 °C, and a reaction time of 6 h. The MLCT content was as high as 80.79% after the transesterification reaction and the purification, and the content of MLCT containing EPA accounted for 70.21%. The distribution of EPA at the sn-2 position showed a significant increase in MLCT compared with the original substrate, from 18.89% to 26.93%. The in vitro digestion results demonstrated that MLCT had a significantly higher EPA bioaccessibility than the original substrate.

CONCLUSION

Eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched MLCT was developed. This may provide a novel strategy for clinical nutritional intervention. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Systematic review of preoperative n-3 fatty acids in major gastrointestinal surgery

Objectives

Perioperative nutrition aims to replenish nutritional stores before surgery and reduce postoperative complications. 'Immunonutrition' (including omega-3 fatty acids) may modulate the immune system and attenuate the postoperative inflammatory response. Hitherto, immunonutrition has overwhelmingly been administered in the postoperative period-however, this may be too late to provide benefit.

Design

A systematic literature search using MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Setting

Perioperative major gastrointestinal surgery.

Participants

Patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

Interventions

Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation commenced in the preoperative period, with or without continuation into postoperative period.

Main outcome measures

The effect of preoperative omega-3 fatty acids on inflammatory response and clinical outcomes.

Results

833 studies were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 RCTs, involving 1456 randomized patients, were included. Ten articles exclusively enrolled patients with cancer. Seven studies used a combination of EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) as the intervention and five studies used EPA alone. Eight out of 12 studies continued preoperative nutritional support into the postoperative period.Of the nine studies reporting mortality, no difference was seen. Duration of hospitalisation ranged from 4.5 to 18 days with intervention and 3.5 to 23.5 days with control. Omega-3 fatty acids had no effect on postoperative C-reactive protein and the effect on cytokines (including tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10) was inconsistent. Ten of the 12 studies had low risk of bias, with one study having moderate bias from allocation and blinding.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to support routine preoperative omega-3 fatty acid supplementation for major gastrointestinal surgery, even when this is continued after surgery.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42018108333.

Nutrition as prevention for improved cancer health outcomes: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Among adults with cancer, malnutrition is associated with decreased treatment completion, more treatment harms and use of health care, and worse short-term survival. To inform the National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention workshop, "Nutrition as Prevention for Improved Cancer Health Outcomes," this systematic review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of providing nutrition interventions before or during cancer therapy to improve outcomes of cancer treatment.

METHODS

We identified randomized controlled trials enrolling at least 50 participants published from 2000 through July 2022. We provide a detailed evidence map for included studies and grouped studies by broad intervention and cancer types. We conducted risk of bias (RoB) and qualitative descriptions of outcomes for intervention and cancer types with a larger volume of literature.

RESULTS

From 9798 unique references, 206 randomized controlled trials from 219 publications met the inclusion criteria. Studies primarily focused on nonvitamin or mineral dietary supplements, nutrition support, and route or timing of inpatient nutrition interventions for gastrointestinal or head and neck cancers. Most studies evaluated changes in body weight or composition, adverse events from cancer treatment, length of hospital stay, or quality of life. Few studies were conducted within the United States. Among intervention and cancer types with a high volume of literature (n = 114), 49% (n = 56) were assessed as high RoB. Higher-quality studies (low or medium RoB) reported mixed results on the effect of nutrition interventions across cancer and treatment-related outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Methodological limitations of nutrition intervention studies surrounding cancer treatment impair translation of findings into clinical practice or guidelines.

Barriers and Facilitators of Adherence to Oral Nutritional Supplements Among People Living With Cancer: A Systematic Review

This study aims to synthesize the barriers and facilitators of oral nutritional supplement adherence in people with cancer and assess levels of adherence. Databases including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database, were used to search articles before January 4, 2021. Eighteen studies with 1,267 participants met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported rates of adherence, ranging from 6.0% to 96.9%. Gastrointestinal intolerances and disliked tastes were considered common barriers to cancer patients' adherence, whereas the ONS management strategy was considered the most crucial facilitator of adherence. Health professionals can improve adherence through regular monitoring and guidance and incentive strategies, and paying attention to the management and prevention of adverse reactions when prescribing nutritional products.

Anti‑inflammatory and nutritional improvement effects of dietary supplementation combined with fish oil in patients with epithelial cancer

The present study investigated the effects of dietary supplementation combined with fish oil containing relatively low levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on the inflammatory and nutritional status of patients with epithelial cancer. Fish oil capsules (498 mg EPA and 213 mg DHA) and dietary supplements (100 kcal and 5 g protein) were administered for 8 weeks to 20 patients with cancer and inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥0.30 mg/dl]. Blood EPA levels increased significantly after 4 and 8 weeks, while no significant differences were observed in log-transformed (log) CRP levels, which were the major inflammatory indices in these patients. A declining trend was observed at 8 weeks after excluding 2 patients with suspected infection (P=0.06). A significant increase was observed from week 0 to week 8 for log interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. After excluding the 2 patients with suspected infection, no significant difference was observed when comparing week 0 to week 8 for log IL-6. No deterioration in albumin or pre-albumin levels was observed. These results suggest that although suppression of acute inflammation associated with infection is difficult, intake of relatively low EPA and DHA supplements may be effective for mild chronic inflammation in patients with epithelial cancer without infection. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to make the final decision regarding efficacy. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; 06/07/2018, UMIN000033309).

Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Basic and clinical reports have suggested that eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) exhibits anti-tumor activity. The present study evaluated whether perioperative EPA could improve the survival of patients with localized gastric cancer as a key secondary endpoint of a randomized clinical study. The present study was designed as multicenter, open-label, superiority, randomized trial to confirm the preventive effect of EPA on body weight loss after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eligible patients were randomized to either the standard-diet group (EPA-off group) or EPA-on group by a centralized dynamic method. An EPA-enriched supplement (ProSure^®) was given to the EPA-on group in addition to their standard diet. This supplement included 600 kcal with 2.2 g/day of EPA. Among the 126 patients who were randomized, 123 patients (EPA-off group, n=60; EPA-on group, n=63) were examined in the survival analyses. All background factors were well balanced between the two groups. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 74.6 and 67.8%, respectively, in the EPA-off group, and 77.8 and 76.2% in the EPA-on group. There was no significant difference between the EPA-off and EPA-on groups (hazard ratio, 0.77; P=0.424). In the subgroup analysis, the hazard ratio was 0.39 in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 0.57 in patients with nodal metastasis. In conclusion, a clear survival benefit of perioperative EPA was not observed in localized gastric cancer. The value of EPA should be further tested in a future study in patients with unfavorable advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial number: UMIN000006380; date of registration, September 21, 2011.

Current status of perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise in gastric cancer surgery: A review

Patients with gastric cancer are often malnourished or sarcopenic during tumor progression. Perioperative malnutrition, including sarcopenia, is strongly related to postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. To improve outcomes, nutritional intervention is common for patients with gastric cancer, especially for those undergoing elective surgery. Several clinical trials evaluating perioperative nutritional intervention have set postoperative loss of body weight and lean body mass as endpoints; however, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, recently, perioperative multimodal interventions that are expected to have a synergistic effect between nutritional intervention and exercise have gained attention. Furthermore, supplementing with leucine, a branched-chain amino acid, in addition to exercise, may be promising for preventing perioperative sarcopenia. However, whether perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise has clinical benefits in gastric surgery is unclear. With the aging of gastric cancer patients, measures to address sarcopenia will become more important in the future. Understanding the significance of nutritional intervention and exercise in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery will help achieve good outcomes.

Oral nutritional supplements versus a regular diet alone for body weight loss after gastrectomy: a phase 3, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Body weight loss (BWL) after gastrectomy is associated with not only a deteriorated quality of life but also a poor prognosis. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) may be used to minimize BWL, which is observed in the first 3 months after gastrectomy and becomes stable thereafter, although the results of several randomized trials remain controversial.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial including 1003 gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy. Patients were assigned to the ONS group or the control group. In the former, 400 ml (400 kcal) per day for 12 weeks as enteral nutrition was planned, and the actual intake amount was recorded daily by patients themselves. The primary endpoint was BWL 1 year after gastrectomy.

RESULTS

BWL data were available in 880 patients (ONS 437, control 443). BWL at 3 months was significantly lower in the ONS group than in the control group (7.1 ± 5.6% and 8.5 ± 5.8%, p = 0.0011). However, the difference gradually declined after 6 months and was not significant 1 year after surgery (9.3 ± 8.2% and 9.8 ± 8.7%, p = 0.37). In the ONS group, 50.4% of patients took more than 200 ml/day of ONS (average 301 ml) and showed significantly less BWL (8.2 ± 7.2%) at 1 year than the control (p = 0.0204).

CONCLUSION

The administration of ONS for 12 weeks after gastrectomy did not improve BWL at 1 year. However, the improvement in BWL remained until 1 year after surgery in patients who took more than 200 kcal/day of ONS.

Nutritional Support Indications in Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients: From Perioperative to Palliative Systemic Therapy. A Comprehensive Review of the Last Decade

Gastric cancer treatments are rapidly evolving, leading to significant survival benefit. Recent evidence provided by clinical trials strongly encouraged the use of perioperative chemotherapy as standard treatment for the localized disease, whereas in the advanced disease setting, molecular characterization has improved patients’ selection for tailored therapeutic approaches, including molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The role of nutritional therapy is widely recognized, with oncologic treatment’s tolerance and response being better in well-nourished patients. In this review, literature data on strategies or nutritional interventions will be critically examined, with particular regard to different treatment phases (perioperative, metastatic, and palliative settings), with the aim to draw practical indications for an adequate nutritional support of gastric cancer patients and provide an insight on future directions in nutritional strategies. We extensively analyzed the last 10 years of literature, in order to provide evidence that may fit current clinical practice both in terms of nutritional interventions and oncological treatment. Overall, 137 works were selected: 34 Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs), 12 meta-analysis, 9 reviews, and the most relevant prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies in this setting. Eleven ongoing trials have been selected from clinicaltrial.gov as representative of current research. One limitation of our work lies in the heterogeneity of the described studies, in terms of sample size, study procedures, and both nutritional and clinical outcomes. Indeed, to date, there are no specific evidence-based guidelines in this fields, therefore we proposed a clinical algorithm with the aim to indicate an appropriate nutritional strategy for gastric cancer patients.

Exercise and Nutritional Approaches to Combat Cancer-Related Bone and Muscle Loss

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this narrative review is to summarise recent literature on the effects of exercise and nutrition interventions alone or in combination on muscle and bone loss in people with cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is emerging evidence to support the inclusion of targeted exercise and nutrition strategies to counter loss of muscle and bone associated with cancer treatments. Although research in this field is advancing, the optimal exercise and nutrition prescription to combat cancer-related bone and muscle loss remain unknown. This review identifies specific components of nutrition and exercise interventions that are promising although require further exploration through studies designed to determine the effect on muscle and bone. A focused research effort is required to elucidate the full potential of exercise and nutrition intervention for people with cancer at risk of bone and muscle loss.

Fish oil supplementation and maintaining muscle mass in chronic disease: state of the evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Providing eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), in the form of fish oils, to benefit muscle is an emerging area of interest. The aim of this work was to evaluate the current literature that has assessed muscle mass as an outcome during a fish oil intervention in any chronic disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The vast majority of studies published in the last 3 years (12 of 15) have been conducted in the oncological setting, in patients undergoing treatment for cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, breast, head and neck, lung, cervix, and hematological cancers. Three studies were conducted in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Fish oil was provided as part of nutrient mixtures in 12 studies and as capsules in three studies.

SUMMARY

Overall, the evidence for an effect of fish oil supplementation on muscle mass in patients with cancer undergoing treatment and in COPD remains unequivocal and reveals limited new knowledge in the area of fish oil supplementation in the cancer setting. Recent literature continues to provide mixed evidence on the efficacy of fish oil on muscle mass and function. The present review highlights challenges in comparing and interpreting current studies aimed at testing fish oil supplementation for muscle health.

Nutrition interventions to treat low muscle mass in cancer

Many patients with cancer experience poor nutritional status, which detrimentally impacts clinical outcomes. Poor nutritional status in cancer is primarily manifested by severe muscle mass (MM) depletion, which may occur at any stage (from curative to palliative) and often co-exists with obesity. The objective of this article was to discuss gaps and opportunities related to the role of nutrition in preventing and reversing low MM in cancer. It also provides a narrative review of relevant nutritional interventions for patients capable of oral intake. The impact of nutrition interventions to prevent/treat low MM in cancer is not well understood, potentially due to the limited number of studies and of clinically viable, accurate body composition assessment tools. Additionally, the type of study designs, inclusion criteria, length of intervention, and choice of nutritional strategies have not been optimal, likely underestimating the anabolic potential of nutrition interventions. Nutrition studies are also often of short duration, and interventions that adapt to the metabolic and behavioural changes during the clinical journey are needed. We discuss energy requirements (25-30 kcal/kg/day) and interventions of protein (1.0-1.5 g/kg/day), branched-chain amino acids (leucine: 2-4 g/day), β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (3 g/day), glutamine (0.3 g/kg/day), carnitine (4-6 g/day), creatine (5 g/day), fish oil/eicosapentanoic acid (2.0-2.2 g/day EPA and 1.5 g/day DHA), vitamin/minerals (e.g. vitamin D: 600-800 international units per day), and multimodal approaches (nutrition, exercise, and pharmaceutical) to countermeasure low MM in cancer. Although the evidence is variable by modality type, interventions were generally not specifically studied in the context of cancer. Understanding patients' nutritional requirements could lead to targeted prescriptions to prevent or attenuate low MM in cancer, with the overall aim of minimizing muscle loss during anti-cancer therapy and maximizing muscle anabolism during recovery. It is anticipated that this will, in turn, improve overall health and prognostication including tolerance to treatment and survival. However, oncology-specific interventions with more robust study designs are needed to facilitate these goals.

Oral Nutritional Supplementation Following Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Analysis Exploring Potential Barriers to Compliance

Objective: Malnutrition is common in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Our goal was to explore postoperative compliance with oral nutritional supplementation and define barriers to consumption in patients with esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cancer.Methods: Participants were prospectively recruited from September 2015 to November 2018. Preoperative nutritional status was assessed using the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Malnourished patients and patients at risk for malnutrition were offered oral nutritional supplementation at the time of hospital discharge. Compliance was evaluated 1 month after hospital discharge.Results: A total of 78 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 62.8 ± 10.7 years and 83.3% were males. Εsophagectomy and gastrectomy were performed in 60.3% and 39.7% of the patients respectively. Twenty-eight (35.9%) participants reported consuming all prescribed supplements, whereas 50 (64.1%) patients were noncompliant with their prescribed oral nutritional supplementation regimen. The main barriers to oral nutritional supplementation compliance were bloating (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 17.9% vs. 58%, p < 0.001), early satiety (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 25% vs. 52.32%, p < 0.001), flavor or texture dislike (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 7.1% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), and diarrhea (compliant vs. noncompliant patients: 10.7% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). No other statistically significant differences were identified between the two groups.Conclusions: Postoperative compliance to oral nutritional supplementation is low in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Patient education and support as well as providing a range of oral nutrition supplement flavors, texture, and compositions may be useful in increasing adherence to oral nutritional supplementation regimens.

Effects of enteral nutritional rich in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the nutritional status of gastrointestinal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Postoperative malnutrition is a major issue among gastrointestinal cancer patients. Because n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) have immunological benefits, n-3 PUFAs are widely used in oral nutritional supplements (ONS). However, n-3 PUFAs in ONS reduced patients' compliance with ONS and affected the role of ONS in maintaining the postoperative nutritional status of patients. The aim of this study was to systematically explore the benefits of enteral nutrition rich in n-3 PUFAs in maintaining the nutritional status of patients after gastrointestinal surgery. Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched through March 16, 2019. The references of related reviews and studies were assessed up to March 16, 2019. The effect sizes from individual studies were calculated as the standardized mean difference (SMD), mean difference (MD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A total of 11 studies (n = 977) were included. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we observed that enteral supplementation of n-3 PUFAs had no significant effect on weight (MD, 1.09; 95% CI, -0.90, 3.08), body mass index (MD, 0.55; 95% CI, -1.45, 2.54), albumin (SMD, 0.39; 95% CI, -0.10, 0.87), wound infections (RR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.57, 1.33), or pneumonia (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.60, 1.59) in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Thus, compared with enteral nutritional without n-3 PUFAs, enteral nutritional rich in n-3 PUFAs has no significant effects on nutritional status, incidence of pneumonia, or wound infections among gastrointestinal cancer patients during postoperative convalescence.

Meta-analysis of preoperative oral nutritional supplements for patients with gastric cancer: East Asian experience

Whether it is beneficial to give preoperative oral nutritional supplements (P-ONS) to gastric cancer (GC) patients is still inconclusive. This study aimed to systematically explore the effectiveness and safety of P-ONS in GC patients. The PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched to identify relevant literature. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (1183 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed significantly lower levels of white blood cells (MD, -0.65; 95% CI, -1.01 to -0.30; P = 0.0003) and C-reactive protein (MD, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.16; P < 0.00001) in the P-ONS group than those in the routine diet group. Compared with the routine diet group, the P-ONS group had higher levels of albumin (MD, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.40-2.87; P = 0.010), IgG (MD, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86; P < 0.00001), IgA (MD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.02-0.37; P = 0.03), CD4⁺ (MD, 2.02; 95% CI, 0.82-3.22; P = 0.001) and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ (MD, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; P = 0.008). However, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in terms of prealbumin (P = 0.08), IgM (P = 0.25), postoperative complications (P = 0.18), and body weight (P = 0.25) between the two groups. For gastric cancer patients with nutritional risk, preoperative oral nutritional supplements for 5-7 days may effectively reduce the postoperative inflammatory response, enhance immune function and improve the nutritional status of patients.