Frailty as an Outcome in Geriatrics Research: Not Ready for Prime Time?

Frailty and Effects of a Multidomain Physical Rehabilitation Intervention Among Older Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Frailty is common among older patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and is associated with worse quality of life (QOL) and a higher risk of clinical events. Frailty can also limit recovery and response to interventions. In the Rehabilitation Therapy in Older Acute Heart Failure Patients (REHAB-HF) trial, a 3-month innovative, early, transitional, tailored, multidomain physical rehabilitation intervention improved physical function and QOL (vs usual care) in older patients with ADHF.

Objective

To evaluate whether baseline frailty modified the benefits of the physical rehabilitation intervention among patients with ADHF enrolled in the REHAB-HF trial and to assess the association between changes in frailty with the risk of adverse clinical outcomes on follow-up.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prespecified secondary analysis of the REHAB-HF trial, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, included 337 patients 60 years and older hospitalized for ADHF. Patients were enrolled from September 17, 2014, through September 19, 2019. Participants were stratified across baseline frailty strata as assessed using modified Fried criteria. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to September 2022.

Interventions

Physical rehabilitation intervention or attention control.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score at 3 months. Clinical outcomes included all-cause hospitalization or mortality at 6 months.

Results

This prespecified secondary analysis included 337 participants; 181 (53.7%) were female, 167 (49.6%) were Black, and the mean (SD) age was 72 (8) years. A total of 192 (57.0%) were frail and 145 (43.0%) were prefrail at baseline. A significant interaction was observed between baseline frailty status and the treatment arm for the primary trial end point of overall SPPB score, with a 2.6-fold larger improvement in SPPB with intervention among frail patients (2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9) vs prefrail patients (0.8; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.6; P for interaction = .03). Trends consistently favored a larger intervention effect size, with significant improvement among frail vs prefrail participants for 6-minute walk distance, QOL, and the geriatric depression score, but interactions did not achieve significance.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prespecified secondary analysis of the REHAB-HF trial, patients with ADHF with worse baseline frailty status had a more significant improvement in physical function in response to an innovative, early, transitional, tailored, multidomain physical rehabilitation intervention than those who were prefrail.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02196038.

The Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin on Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly Study

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with chronic inflammation, which may be modified by aspirin. The purpose of this study was to determine whether low-dose aspirin reduces incident frailty in healthy older adult participants of the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial.

METHODS

In the United States and Australia, 19 114 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥70 and older (U.S. minorities ≥65 years) and free of overt cardiovascular disease, persistent physical disability, and dementia were enrolled in ASPREE, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 100-mg daily aspirin versus placebo. Frailty, a prespecified study end point, was defined according to a modified Fried frailty definition (Fried frailty) and the frailty index based on the deficit accumulation model (frailty index). Competing risk Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare time to incident frailty by aspirin versus placebo. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to include frailty data with and without imputation of missing data.

RESULTS

Over a median 4.7 years, 2 252 participants developed incident Fried frailty, and 4 451 had incident frailty according to the frailty index. Compared with placebo, aspirin treatment did not alter the risk of incident frailty (Fried frailty hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.13; frailty index HR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.09). The proportion of individuals classified as frail, and the trajectory in continuous frailty scores over time, were not different between the aspirin and placebo treatment groups. The results were consistent across a series of subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aspirin use in healthy older adults when initiated in older ages does not reduce risk of incident frailty or the trajectory of frailty.

A cross-sectional study investigating the relationships between self-management abilities, productive patient-professional interactions, and well-being of community-dwelling frail older people

Worldwide, the maintenance of well-being in ageing populations with associated frailty has become increasingly important. To maintain well-being during ageing, investment in frail older people’s self-management abilities and the fostering of productive interactions with healthcare professionals may lead to higher levels of well-being. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between community-dwelling frail older people’s self-management abilities, productive patient-professional interactions and well-being, while controlling for socio-demographic characteristics. This cross-sectional study included 588 community-dwelling frail older people (aged ≥ 75 years) from 15 general practitioner (GP) practices in the Netherlands. Well-being (Social Production Function Instrument for the Level of well-being short), productivity of interactions with GPs (relational coproduction instrument), and self-management abilities (Self-Management Ability Scale short) were measured during in-home face-to-face interviews by trained interviewers. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and linear mixed-effects models. Significant relationships were detected between self-management abilities and the overall, social, and physical well-being of older people, and between productive interactions with GPs and overall and social well-being, but not physical well-being. In a time of ageing populations with associated frailty, investment in frail older people’s self-management abilities and the productivity of patient-professional interactions may be beneficial for this population’s well-being.

Tale of the Frail: Understanding Frailty in Cirrhosis

Frailty is a dynamic condition that results in increased vulnerability to health stressors. Often associated with older adults, frailty is not limited to the geriatric population, although aging and disease burden often go hand in hand. This syndrome is recognized increasingly as an important factor in healthcare costs, rate of adverse outcomes, and overall resource utilization. Frailty may be reversible to a degree, and thus appropriate recognition affords a focus for efficient intervention. Notably, frailty is becoming increasingly relevant in cirrhosis, and has been noted to be an independent predictor of outcomes in patients both before and after liver transplantation. Cirrhosis is currently the 12th leading cause of death in the United States, and its incidence is anticipated to markedly increase in the coming years with the aging of our population. With the anticipated surge in disease prevalence, liver disease care will likely shift from specialist-driven to a multidisciplinary approach between primary care physicians, internists, and hepatologists to adequately care for these patients. This review serves as a guide for clinicians to learn about frailty, its role in cirrhosis, and the current tools to educate patients and families about the importance of nutrition and physical exercise within this population.

Mapping frailty concepts to SNOMED CT

BACKGROUND

Frailty is considered an emerging syndrome characterized by a decrease in physiological ability to respond to stressors, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates. Frailty is distinguished from normal age-associated decline because it is a sharp and often rapid decline rather than a gradual slowing down of general functioning. The comprehensive geriatric assessment is currently considered the gold standard for identifying frailty in older adults. The electronic version of this tool is called the eCGA and is commonly included in electronic medical records (EMR) in primary care settings.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the adequacy of SNOMED CT to represent frailty concepts by addressing three research questions: 1) What are the defining characteristics of frailty most commonly used in frailty assessment tools? 2) Are these characteristics captured within one or many frailty assessment tools? 3) Which data elements from existing tool(s) can be reliably mapped to existing SNOMED CT terms?

METHODS

We conducted a literature search to explore the defining characteristics of frailty and the most commonly used assessment tools. We compared these findings to the components of frailty captured within the eCGA. We then used a descriptive study design to manually map concepts from the eCGA to SNOMED CT.

RESULTS

Our literature review demonstrated that the eCGA contains all common defining characteristics of frailty. Unique assessment questions from the eCGA (n = 133) were manually mapped to SNOMED CT, using expert consensus. Of these, 72 % were direct matches, 17 % were one-to-many matches, and the remaining 11 % were non-matches. Two rounds of expert clinician mapping occurred; inter-rater reliability between the two clinicians was 0.75 (kappa).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

The resulting list of mapped eCGA elements to SNOMED CT terms can inform revisions to existing chronic disease databases to include frailty monitoring and surveillance.

Evaluation of Clinically Meaningful Changes in Measures of Frailty

Background

To determine the clinically meaningful changes and responsiveness of widely used frailty measures.

Methods

We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study of 1,135 community-dwelling older adults who underwent assessments of frailty and health-related quality of life using the EuroQol-5D at baseline and 1 year later. Frailty measures included deficit-accumulation frailty index (FI); frailty phenotype; Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss of Weight scale; and the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF) index. We determined the clinically meaningful changes by the distribution-based method and the anchor-based method using the EuroQol-5D score and responsiveness indices.

Results

Frailty measures were available in 925 participants at 1 year (81.5%). Based on the distribution-based method, small and large clinically meaningful changes were 0.019 and 0.057 for FI, 0.249 and 0.623 for frailty phenotype, 0.235 and 0.587 for FRAIL scale, and 0.116 and 0.289 for SOF index, respectively. The anchor-based estimates of small and large changes were 0.028 and 0.076 for FI, 0.097 and 0.607 for frailty phenotype, 0.269 and 0.368 for FRAIL scale, and 0.023 and 0.287 for SOF index, respectively. Based on the responsiveness index, per-group sample sizes to achieve 80% power in clinical trials, ranged from 51 (FI) to 7,272 (SOF index) for a small change and 9 (FI) to 133 (FRAIL scale) for a large change.

Conclusions

The estimates of clinically meaningful change of frailty measures can inform the choice of frailty measures to track longitudinal changes of frailty in clinical trials and clinical care of community-dwelling older adults.

The impact of interventions on management of frailty in hospitalized frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

One of the most challenging issues for the elderly population is the clinical state of frailty. Frailty is defined as a cumulative decline across psychological, physical, and social functioning. Hospitalization is one of the most stressful events for older people who are becoming frail. The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of interventions focused on management of frailty in hospitalized frail older adults.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of research was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Web of Science electronic databases for papers published between 2000 and 2019. Randomized controlled studies were included that were aimed at the management of frailty in hospitalized older adults. The outcomes which were examined included frailty; physical, psychological, and social domains; length of stay in hospital; re-hospitalization; mortality; patient satisfaction; and the need for post discharge placement.

RESULTS

After screening 7976 records and 243 full-text articles, seven studies (3 interventions) were included, involving 1009 hospitalized older patients. The quality of these studies was fair to poor and the risk of publication bias in the studies was low. Meta-analysis of the studies showed statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups for the management of frailty in hospitalized older adults (ES = 0.35; 95% CI: 0. 067-0.632; z = 2.43; P < 0.015). However, none of the included studies evaluated social status, only a few of the studies evaluated other secondary outcomes. The analysis also showed that a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment unit intervention was effective in addressing physical and psychological frailty, re-hospitalization, mortality, and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions for hospitalized frail older adults are effective in management of frailty. Multidimensional interventions conducted by a multidisciplinary specialist team in geriatric settings are likely to be effective in the care of hospitalized frail elderly. Due to the low number of RCTs carried out in a hospital setting and the low quality of existing studies, there is a need for new RCTs to be carried out to generate a protocol appropriate for frail older people.

Risk score for nonhome discharge after lower extremity bypass

OBJECTIVE

Patients undergoing lower extremity bypass (LEB) for peripheral artery disease require intensive health care resource utilization including rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities. However, few studies have evaluated factors that lead to nonhome discharge (NHD) in this population of patients. This study sought to predict NHD by preoperative risk factors in patients undergoing LEB for peripheral artery disease using a novel risk score.

METHODS

The Vascular Study Group of New England database was queried for elective LEB for peripheral artery disease including claudication and critical limb ischemia from 2003 to 2017. Patients were excluded if the procedure was not elective, if they were not admitted from home, if they were bedridden, or if they died during the index admission. Only preoperative factors were considered in the analysis. The primary end point was NHD including rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities. Data were split two-thirds for model derivation and one-third for validation. In the derivation cohort, bivariate analysis assessed the association of preoperative factors with NHD. A parsimonious manual stepwise binary logistic regression for NHD aimed at maximizing the C statistic while maintaining model simplicity was performed. A risk score was developed using the β coefficients and applied to the validation data set. The risk score performance was assessed using a C statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test for model fit.

RESULTS

There were 10,145 cases included with an overall NHD rate of 26.4% (n = 2676). Mean age was 66 years (range, 41-90 years). NHD patients were older (72 years vs 64 years; P < .01) and more frequently male (57.2% vs 42.8%; P < .01) and nonwhite (16.1% vs 9.9%; P < .01); they more frequently had tissue loss (54.2% vs 23.0%; P < .01), anemia (16.0% vs 5.3%; P < .01), severe cardiac comorbidity (21.8% vs 10.5%; P < .01), and insulin-dependent diabetes (33.3% vs 18.2%; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with NHD included age, sex, nonwhite race, tissue loss, cardiac comorbidity, partial ambulatory deficit, and insulin-dependent diabetes. The C statistic was 0.78 in the derivation group and 0.79 in the validation group, with Hosmer-Lemeshow P > .999. The risk score ranged from 0 to 18, with a mean score of 4 (standard deviation ±3.5). The risk score was divided into low risk (0-4 points; n = 5272 [52%]; NHD = 10.1%]), moderate risk (5-9 points; n = 3663 [36.7%]; NHD = 36.7%), and high risk (≥10 points; n = 1210 [11.9%]; NHD = 66.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel risk score was highly predictive for NHD after LEB for peripheral artery disease using only preoperative comorbidities. High-risk patients account for 12% of LEB but nearly a third of all patients requiring NHD. This risk score can be used preoperatively to determine high-risk patients for NHD, which may help improve preoperative counseling and hospital efficiency by allocating resources appropriately.

Health and Aging: Unifying Concepts, Scores, Biomarkers and Pathways

Despite increasing research efforts, there is a lack of consensus on defining aging or health. To understand the underlying processes, and to foster the development of targeted interventions towards increasing one's health, there is an urgent need to find a broadly acceptable and useful definition of health, based on a list of (molecular) features; to operationalize features of health so that it can be measured; to identify predictive biomarkers and (molecular) pathways of health; and to suggest interventions, such as nutrition and exercise, targeted at putative causal pathways and processes. Based on a survey of the literature, we propose to define health as a state of an individual characterized by the core features of physiological, cognitive, physical and reproductive function, and a lack of disease. We further define aging as the aggregate of all processes in an individual that reduce its wellbeing, that is, its health or survival or both. We define biomarkers of health by their attribute of predicting future health better than chronological age. We define healthspan pathways as molecular features of health that relate to each other by belonging to the same molecular pathway. Our conceptual framework may integrate diverse operationalizations of health and guide precision prevention efforts.

Defining Frailty in Research Abstracts: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Standardization

Multiple definitions of frailty are used. We sought to quantify the frequency that frailty is insufficiently defined in published abstracts. We conducted a systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed for English abstracts of original research investigating frailty as an exposure or outcome in humans from 2015-2017. A complete definition of frailty included: 1) a named measure of frailty, including "frailty" alone, 2) details on variables included (e.g. grip strength), 3) number of variables included (e.g. 33-item frailty index), and 4) details on cutoffs or levels of frailty unless a definition was used continuously. Our search yielded 1,110 titles; 490 abstracts met review criteria, 348 abstracts had any definition of frailty and were included. Majority reported a single measure of frailty (n=313, 90%). The most commonly used measures were variations of Fried's phenotype (n=167, 48%) and Rockwood's cumulative deficit model (n=101, 29%). Only 56 abstracts had complete definitions (16%). In 123 abstracts (35%), a means of measuring frailty was named, but no additional details were given. When details of the frailty measure were described, they generally referred to cutoffs or levels rather than variables used in the measure. A minority of abstracts of original manuscripts related to frailty research had adequate definitions of frailty. We encourage scientists to adopt a standardized approach to defining the term for all abstracts related to frailty research to facilitate systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and accurate reporting of frailty science.

Integrating Frailty and Cognitive Phenotypes: Why, How, Now What?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review elucidates the concept of frailty in relationship to reserve and resilience, the relationships and shared pathophysiology between physical frailty and cognitive impairment, the theoretical underpinnings of three integrated phenotypes of physical and cognitive impairments, and the potential of incorporating biomarkers into phenotype refinement and validation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The fact that frailty and cognitive impairment are associated and often coexist in older adults has led to the popular view of expanding the definition of frailty to include cognitive impairment. However, there is great variability in approaches to and assumptions regarding the integrated phenotypes of physical frailty and cognitive impairment.

SUMMARY

The development of integrated frailty and cognitive phenotypes should explicate the types of frailty and cognitive impairment they intend to capture and prioritize the incorporation of biological theories that help determine shared and distinct pathways in the progression to physical and cognitive impairments.

Prehabilitation is better than cure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With a continuously growing number of older patients undergoing major surgical procedures, reliable parameters practicable in perioperative routine revealing those patients at risk are urgently needed. Recently, the concept of 'prehabilitation' with its key elements exercise, nutrition and psychological stress reduction especially in frail patients is attracting increasing attention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Literature search revealed a huge amount of publications in particular within the last 12 months. Although a single definition of both frailty and prehabilitation is still to be made, various players in the perioperative setting obviously are becoming increasingly convinced about a possible benefit of the program - referring to different components and measures performed. Although physiologically advantages seem obvious, there is hardly any reliable data on clinical outcomes resulting from properly performed studies. This applies especially to octogenarians; thus those at risk for adverse events the concept originally addresses.

SUMMARY

Identifying high-risk patients at the earliest possible stage and increasing their physiological reserve prior to surgery is a promising approach that seems to result in remarkable improvements for older patients. However, further studies on effectiveness in a highly heterogeneous population and agreement on a common concept are mandatory before a final judgement can be given.

The impact of physical activity and sedentary behaviors on frailty levels

Heterogeneity in aging can be explained by frailty. Lifestyle behaviors such as physical activity can help manage frailty levels. Conversely, sedentary behaviours are associated with frailty independently of physical activity. Here, we summarize epidemiological and clinical trial evidence concerning the impact of physical activity and sedentary behaviors on frailty levels. We also analysed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data to describe physical activity and sedentary behavior accumulation patterns across frailty levels and their impact on mortality risk. The few prospective and intervention studies demonstrate that higher physical activity levels are associated with a lower incidence of frailty. There are no interventions published which limit sedentary behaviors to manage frailty. Using the NHANES data we demonstrate that individuals are less likely to meet physical activity guidelines and are more likely to accumulate sedentary time in prolonged bouts. Prolonged sedentary bouts and total sedentary time were associated with a higher mortality risk in frail individuals but not in the fit group. Non-bouted sedentary time was not associated with mortality risk. Our review and novel data suggest that there is a need for more intervention studies which focus on increasing physical activity or minimizing sedentary time to manage frailty levels.