Treatments of Primary Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Freedom from Recurrence across Age in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Treated with Image-Guided Superficial Radiation Therapy

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality; their incidence is increasing most in older patients. NMSCs have traditionally been treated with surgical excision, curettage, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), and superficial radiotherapy (SRT). Image-guided SRT (IGSRT) is a treatment option for poor surgical candidates or patients with low- or high-risk, early-stage NMSC who prefer to avoid surgery. This large retrospective cohort study compared 2-, 4-, and 6-year freedom from recurrence in biopsy-proven NMSC lesions treated with IGSRT (n = 20,069 lesions) between patients aged < 65 years (n = 3158 lesions) and ≥65 years (n = 16,911 lesions). Overall freedom from recurrence rates were 99.68% at 2 years, 99.57% at 4 years, and 99.57% at 6 years. Rates did not differ significantly by age (p = 0.8) nor by sex among the two age groups (p > 0.9). There was a significant difference in recurrence among older patients when analyzed by stage (p = 0.032), but no difference by stage in younger patients (p = 0.7). For early-stage NMSCs, IGSRT is a clinically equivalent alternative to MMS and statistically significant in superiority to non-image-guided SRT. This study demonstrates that there is no significant effect of age on 2-, 4-, or 6-year freedom from recurrence in patients with IGSRT-treated NMSC.

Sequential combination of sonic hedgehog inhibitors followed by consolidation radiotherapy in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sonic hedgehog inhibitors (SHHis) are an effective treatment in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC). However, the use of these drugs is limited by adverse events, and relapse at discontinuation in around one-half of patients. A few cases of patients treated concomitantly by radiotherapy (RT) and SHHis have been reported in the literature, suggesting that the combination results in an improved overall response. Maintaining complete response after stopping treatment is a concern, especially as resuming treatment in the case of relapse does not guarantee a new therapeutic response. The optimal combination and sequence of treatment to improve local control of laBCCs are not yet defined.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that consolidation RT after complete response to SHHis could reduce the risk of relapse at discontinuation.

METHODS

We present a case series of patients with laBCCs who achieved complete response after SHHi treatment and were treated with consolidation RT. Patients were evaluated by a skin cancer board. The closure RT technique and dosage were refined by a radiotherapist.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included. SHHis were prescribed for a median 5 months (range 4-11). Consolidation RT was performed after complete response to SHHis and discontinuation. RT was delivered at a median dose of 45 Gy (range 40.5-66) in 10 fractions (range 9-33). With a median follow-up of 23 months, all patients maintained complete clinical response. This strategy was well tolerated with no grade 3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

SHHi treatment followed by consolidation RT after drug discontinuation seems effective and safe. Further studies are needed to develop a precise strategy for the management of laBCCs.

Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab: Analysis of a phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

A phase 2 cemiplimab study (NCT03132636) demonstrated a 24.1% objective response rate in patients diagnosed with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) who were not candidates for continued hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) therapy due to intolerance to previous HHI therapy, disease progression while receiving HHI therapy, or having not better than stable disease on HHI therapy after 9 months. Here, health-related quality of life (QoL) for this patient population is reported.

METHODS

Adult patients with mBCC were treated with intravenous cemiplimab at a dose of 350 mg every 3 weeks for 5 treatment cycles of 9 weeks/cycle then 4 treatment cycles of 12 weeks/cycle. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Skindex-16 questionnaires at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle. Across Cycles 2 to 9, the overall change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed model with repeated measures. Responder analyses determined clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration (changes ≥10 points) or maintenance across all scales.

RESULTS

Patients reported low symptom burden and moderate-to-high functioning at baseline. Maintenance for QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL and across all functioning and symptom scales was indicated by overall mean changes from baseline. Clinically meaningful improvement or maintenance was reported at Cycle 2 for GHS/QoL (77%), functioning scales (77% to 86%), and symptom scales (70% to 93%), with similar proportions of improvement or maintenance at Cycles 6 and 9, excluding fatigue. On the Skindex-16, clinically meaningful improvement or maintenance was reported across the emotional, symptom, and functional subscales, in 76%-88% of patients at Cycle 2, which were generally maintained at Cycles 6 and 9. Overall mean changes from baseline showed maintenance across these subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients treated with cemiplimab reported improvement or maintenance in GHS/QoL and functioning while maintaining a low symptom burden.

Jet-injection assisted photodynamic therapy for superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with topical δ-Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has efficacy in treating basal cell carcinoma (BCC) but is limited by incomplete penetration of ALA into the deeper dermis. This prospective open-label pilot trial investigated the safety and efficacy of photosensitizer jet injection for PDT (JI-PDT) for BCC treatment. It was performed with 15 patients (n = 15) with histologically confirmed, untreated, low-risk nodular BCCs at a single institution.

METHODS

For the intervention, JI-PDT patients (n = 11) received two sessions of jet-injected ALA with PDT separated by four to 6 weeks. To further understand treatment technique, another group of patients (n = 4) received jet-injected ALA followed by tumor excision and fluorescence microscopy (JI-E). Treatment tolerability was assessed by local skin responses (LSR) score at five distinct time intervals. Fluorescence microscopy assessed protoporphyrin IX penetration depth and biodistribution within the tumor. At the primary endpoint, tumor clearance was evaluated via visual inspection, dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy. Postinjection and postillumination pain levels, and patient satisfaction, were scored on a 0-10 scale.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants with mean age of 58.3, who were 15/15 White, non-Hispanic enrolled. The median composite LSR score immediately after JI-PDT was 5 (interquartile range [IQR] = 3) which decreased to 0.5 (IQR = 1) at primary endpoint (p < 0.01). Immunofluorescence of excised BCC tumors with jet-injected ALA showed photosensitizer penetration into papillary and reticular dermis. Of the 13 JI-PDT tumors, 11 had tumor clearance confirmed, 1 recurred, and 1 was lost to follow-up. 1/11 patients experienced a serious adverse event of cellulitis. 70% of patients had local scarring at 3 months. Patients reported an average pain level of 5.6 (standard deviation [SD] = 2.3) during jet injection and 3.7 (SD = 1.8) during light illumination.

CONCLUSIONS

Jet injection of ALA for PDT treatment of nodular low-risk BCC is tolerable and feasible and may represent a novel modality to improve PDT.

Therapeutic Approaches for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Standard of Care and Emerging Modalities

Skin cancer encompasses a range of cutaneous malignancies, with non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) being the most common neoplasm worldwide. Skin exposure is the leading risk factor for initiating NMSC. Ultraviolet (UV) light induces various genomic aberrations in both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing genes in epidermal cells. In conjunction with interactions with a changed stromal microenvironment and local immune suppression, these aberrations contribute to the occurrence and expansion of cancerous lesions. Surgical excision is still the most common treatment for these lesions; however, locally advanced or metastatic disease significantly increases the chances of morbidity or death. In recent years, numerous pharmacological targets were found through extensive research on the pathogenic mechanisms of NMSCs, leading to the development of novel treatments including Hedgehog pathway inhibitors for advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Despite the efficacy of these new drugs, drug resistance and tolerability issues often arise with long-term treatment. Ongoing studies aim to identify alternative strategies with reduced adverse effects and increased tolerability. This review summarizes the current and emerging therapies used to treat NMSC.

Interdisciplinary management of skin cancer

The interdisciplinary treatment of skin cancer in the head and neck area requires close collaboration between different specialist disciplines. The most common non-melanoma skin cancer tumor entities are cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma as well as their precursor lesions. One of the less common tumors is Merkel cell carcinoma, which also occurs primarily in light-exposed areas and, in contrast to squamous and basal cell carcinoma, is more likely to metastasize. Due to the low tendency of basal cell carcinoma as well as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to metastasize, a cure can often be achieved by surgery. If the tumor growth exceeds certain levels it may require collaboration between dermatology and otorhinolaryngology. The primary goal of this interdisciplinary collaboration is to achieve a functional, cosmetically and aesthetically acceptable result in addition to adequate tumor treatment. Depending on the stage of the tumor and the clinical course, a case may be discussed in an interdisciplinary tumor board in order to determine a personalised, appropriate and adequate treatment concept for each patient, including prevention, therapy and follow-up.

Patient-Orientated Evaluation of Treatment of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer with Rhenium-188 Compared to Surgery

BACKGROUND

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are responsible for up to one-third of all human malignancies. Surgery is usually the treatment of choice, but patients often experience pain during the procedure. Topical rhenium-188 resin skin cancer treatment (RSCT) may be a valid therapeutic alternative.

METHODS

In this monocentric pilot study, 19 patients suffering from NMSC were treated with RSCT. Most of these patients had also experienced surgery, either because they developed a new NMSC in aftercare, or they had suffered previously from NMSC. Three RSCT-treated patients, who had no exposure to surgery so far, were paired with three matched patients, who had received surgery. We sought to evaluate and compare the patients' experience with both treatments. A questionnaire assessed patients' perceptions regarding side effects, aesthetic outcomes, wound care, fear of complications, and personal treatment preferences. Patients evaluated the different parameters of their either RSCT- or surgery-treated lesions on a scale from 0-10.

RESULTS

Patients were more afraid of complications before surgery than before RSCT (p = 0.04). Treatment with RSCT caused significantly less pain on treatment day (mean 0.56) than surgery (mean 2.32) (0 no pain, 10 maximum pain) (p = 0.02) and 14 days after the procedure (mean 0.89 versus mean 2.47) (p = 0.02). On day 14, RSCT-treated lesions were also significantly less itchy (mean 0.34) than after surgery (mean 1.50). Most patients were very satisfied with the aesthetic outcome after both RSCT (mean 8.42) and surgery (mean 8.31) (p = 0.89). In the case of a new NMSC, the majority of patients who experienced both treatments would rather be treated primarily with RSCT (44%) or would consider both options (31%); only 19% preferred surgery.

CONCLUSION

Patients evaluated RSCT as less painful than surgery. The aesthetic outcomes of both treatments were comparable. For pain-sensitive patients, RSCT might be a preferable treatment option.

Head and neck nonmelanoma skin cancers: surgical management and debated issues

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review critically assesses the current literature and guidelines, aiming to clarify some of the most important factors that impact surgical strategies of head and neck nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), focusing on squamous, basal, and Merkel cell carcinomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments underscore the complexity of treatment for NMSC, particularly in the head and neck region. There is a lack of high-level evidence for the management of these tumors, especially in advanced stages. The need to tailor the extent of surgical margins and parotid/neck management to different histotypes, considering the varying risk factors for recurrence, is beginning to emerge in the literature. Moreover, the role of immunotherapy and targeted therapies for locally advanced disease, alongside traditional treatment options, is progressively growing.

SUMMARY

NMSCs represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies with varying treatment complexities and prognoses. Management of NMSC is evolving towards an increasingly personalized strategy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic framework.

Clinical and toxicity outcomes with 3D based-HDR surface mold brachytherapy in skin cancer

INTRODUCTION

Surface mold brachytherapy (SMBT) is an established treatment modality in skin cancer, especially in accessible areas, and has shown comparable outcomes to surgery. We have presented our results for the skin tumor treatment with SMBT treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in terms of clinical outcomes and toxicity at our institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 15 patients with skin cancer were treated with customized tube-based SMBT at our institute between January 2019 and July 2021. The patients were treated using HDR-brachytherapy using Iridium-192. The median dose was 40 Gy in 10 fractions. The dosimetric parameters were assessed, and patients were followed up as per the institutional protocol. All patients underwent individualized CT-based planning. Skin toxicity was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

RESULTS

With the majority of the patients being male, the median age was 59 years and the most common site affected was the face (8/15; 53.3%). Among the 15 cases, five were squamous cell carcinoma, nine were basal cell carcinoma, and a single case of sebaceous cell carcinoma. The median depth of invasion was 4 mm, and the median catheter-to-surface distance was 1 mm. The complete response rate among the 10 definitive cases was 90% and partial response in one case. The treatment was well-tolerated with no grade 3-5 toxicities. The median V95% and V90% were 94.8% and 97.1%, respectively. The mean coverage index (C.I.), dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), and overdose volume index (ODI) were 0.97, 0.13, and 0.05, respectively. After a median follow-up of 12 months, none of the patients had recurrence. On assessment of DLQI, the scores were found to be significant in association with the tumor size and tumor site with scores favoring <2 cm and non-exposed area lesions.

CONCLUSION

SMBT is a safe and effective treatment modality for skin tumors providing excellent response and cosmetic outcomes. It is well-tolerated and a non-invasive option for elderly patients with comorbidities and lesions in inoperable areas.

Salvage re-irradiation in non-melanoma skin cancers: A multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We conducted a multicentre real-world study to assess the outcomes of radical salvage re-irradiation for non-melanoma skin cancer (nMSC) recurrences following definitive or postoperative radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on patients treated between 2006 and 2022 with re-irradiation for nMSCs were retrospectively collected from five high-volume brachytherapy centers. The primary endpoint was local control (LC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox Proportional-Hazards Model were utilised in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients with a median age of 78.4 years with recurrences of previously irradiated nMSC in the head and neck region were included in the analysis. The majority had cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC; 91.4%), and were irradiated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT; 91.4%). The most common locations included the nasal region (36.2%) and external ear (18.9%). The 1-year LC was 73.1% and decreased to 41.7% at three years. The size of the re-irradiated lesion was the single independent prognostic factor in Cox analysis (per mm; HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.11; p < 0.001). Grade 3 or worse AEs were reported in 7 cases (12.1%).

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation for nMSCs, predominantly administered with brachytherapy for radiorecurrent BCC, is associated with high recurrence rates, and the risk of failure significantly increases with the size of the treated lesion. Re-irradiation could be an option for selected elderly patients with small, localised, inoperable recurrences after RT to achieve local control or defer systemic treatment; however, prospective trials are necessary to confirm its safety and efficacy.

Assessment of therapeutic efficacy in seven cases of basal cell carcinoma in the ear and nose region treated with new surgical excision and immediate photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent non-melanoma skin tumor. It commonly affects exposed areas. Currently, surgical resection is considered the primary approach for BCC treatment. However, BCC frequently affects exposed facial areas, leading to visible scars after surgery. PDT has garnered increasing recent attention, demonstrating superior efficacy and favorable cosmetic outcomes for superficial BCCs. However, it shows limited treatment effectiveness for deep-seated tumors. Most of the current literature focuses on the combination of surgery and postoperative PDT, while no studies have reported on the use of standard surgical excision with intraoperative margin pathological monitoring and immediate PDT. Therefore, we implemented a treatment protocol combining surgery and immediate PDT. Accordingly, this paper aimed to explore the effectiveness, cosmetic outcomes, and other relevant advantages of this therapeutic approach.

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate this approach in seven patients with BCC on the nose and ears. Standard surgical excision of skin lesions was performed, with intraoperative frozen section examination of the margins, followed by immediate postoperative PDT for the wounds, and continued periodic PDT during the second phase of wound healing.

RESULTS

All seven cases demonstrated significant improvement. The cosmetic rating was 100 % and no cases of recurrence existed among the seven patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach effectively minimized the surgical wound, improved tumor clearance, achieved precise therapeutic effects, and reduced the recurrence rate. Moreover, it produced favorable cosmetic outcomes.

Recurrent Deeply Invasive Basal Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent skin malignancy worldwide. The majority of BCCs grow slowly and have a low metastatic potential. However, they can be destructive to surrounding tissues since they are locally invasive.

METHODS

This case report was conducted on a 78-year-old woman complaining of a solid lump on the left side of the neck and nonhealing lesion. Three years earlier, she had BCC on the same site. Clinical and radiographic examinations were made. The biopsy specimens revealed that it is a recurrent BCC. In operating room, during blunt tissue dissection, the arterial wall was damaged. Tumor was overgrown left internal carotid artery near the bifurcation. Infiltrated part of arteria wall was resected, and a synthetic arterial prosthesis was placed.

RESULTS

Follow-up after 4 months showed that the wound was healing well. No complications regarding cardiovascular and other organ systems were seen.

Topical 188Re Ionizing Radiation Therapy Exerts High Efficacy in Curing Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most frequent malignancy. Surgical intervention is the common treatment but may lead to disappointing results; alternative treatment options are needed.

METHODS

In this monocentric pilot study, topical 188Re resin was investigated as a treatment for invasive NMSC up to 3-mm thickness. Twenty-two patients with 40 histologically confirmed NMSCs with a median size of 1.25 cm2 (range, 0.04-16.8 cm2) and a median tumor thickness of 0.35 mm (range, 0.1-2.1 mm) were included. Patients were treated once with 188Re resin with a targeted dose of 50 Gy. The median applied activity was 111.4 MBq (range, 21.0-168.0 MBq), and the median treatment time was 89 minutes (range, 38-175 minutes). The response rate, adverse events, and cosmetic outcome were assessed at 14 days, 4 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Response rate at 12 months was 97.5%, with 95% complete responses (clinically or histologically proven in case of clinical doubt). Most adverse events were reported at 14 days, with 20% itching and 12.5% mostly minor pain. Forty-nine percent of the lesions showed hypopigmentation only at 12 months. Forty-one percent of the lesions were graded as cosmetically superior to the expected result after surgery and 51.3% as comparable to successful surgery. The cosmetic outcome on the head and face was superior compared with the trunk and leg (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

188Re resin is a highly effective treatment for NMSC up to 3-mm thickness and a valid alternative to surgery, specifically for tumors located on sensitive areas such as nose or ear.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma-update 2023

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumour in white populations. Multidisciplinary experts from European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), European Dermatology Forum, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology developed updated recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of BCC. BCCs were categorised into 'easy-to-treat' (common) and 'difficult-to-treat' according to the new EADO clinical classification. Diagnosis is based on clinico-dermatoscopic features, although histopathological confirmation is mandatory in equivocal lesions. The first-line treatment of BCC is complete surgery. Micrographically controlled surgery shall be offered in high-risk and recurrent BCC, and BCC located on critical anatomical sites. Topical therapies and destructive approaches can be considered in patients with low-risk superficial BCC. Photodynamic therapy is an effective treatment for superficial and low-risk nodular BCCs. Management of 'difficult-to-treat' BCCs should be discussed by a multidisciplinary tumour board. Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs), vismodegib or sonidegib, should be offered to patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC. Immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies (cemiplimab) is a second-line treatment in patients with a progression of disease, contraindication, or intolerance to HHI therapy. Radiotherapy represents a valid alternative in patients who are not candidates for or decline surgery, especially elderly patients. Electrochemotherapy may be offered when surgery or radiotherapy is contraindicated. In Gorlin patients, regular skin examinations are required to diagnose and treat BCCs at an early stage. Long-term follow-up is recommended in patients with high-risk BCC, multiple BCCs, and Gorlin syndrome.

Recommendations for Cost-Conscious Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) affects 3.3 million Americans annually. Treatment modalities for BCC include many surgical and nonsurgical options. The cost of BCC treatment can pose a substantial burden to patients and the healthcare system. Cost can be an important consideration in BCC treatment planning.

OBJECTIVE

We present an approach to the management of BCC when cost reduction is a priority.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search identified studies on effectiveness of current BCC therapies. Treatment prices were obtained from the Medicare National Fee Schedule, GoodRx, and pharmaceutical companies. The American Academy of Dermatology's (AAD) guidelines for treating BCC were used to develop recommendations for cost-reductive treatment.

RESULTS

The cost of treating a primary superficial BCC < 0.5 cm arising on Area M (cheeks, forehead, scalp, neck, jawline, pretibial surface) was $143 with curettage and electrodesiccation (C&E), $143 with cryosurgery, $210 with standard excision and simple reconstruction (SE), $1221 with Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) and simple reconstruction, $472 with imiquimod, $186 with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and $354-$371 for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The cost of treating a primary nodular BCC 1.1-2 cm arising on Area L (trunk and extremities, excluding pretibial surface, hands, feet, nail units and ankles) was $183 with C&E, $183 with cryosurgery, $251 with SE and simple reconstruction, $1163-1351 with MMS and simple reconstruction, $472 with imiquimod, $186 with 5-FU, and $354-$371 for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The cost of treating a giant BCC (BCC > 10 cm with aggressive behavior) was $465-3311 with radiation, $139,560 with vismodegib, $144,452 with sonidegib, ~ $44.5 with cisplatin (medication cost only), and at least $184,836 with cemiplimab-rwlc.

CONCLUSIONS

For a primary superficial BCC < 0.5 cm arising on Area M, the cost-conscious algorithm prioritizes C&E or cryosurgery. For a primary nodular BCC 1.1-2 cm arising on Area L, the cost-conscious algorithm prioritizes C&E, cryosurgery, or 5-FU. For a giant BCC, the cost-conscious algorithm identifies superficial radiation therapy as first line.

An update on the current and emerging pharmacotherapies for basal cell carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Despite surgical approach is still the mainstay for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) management, several issues may limit the use of this technique, leading to the need for new treatments to offer patients a personalized approach.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive review of the available and emerging pharmacologic strategies for BCC management, including mechanisms of action, and potential adverse effects, has been performed to provide with an up-to-date manuscript on the current treatment scenario of BCC. Globally, targeting the Sonic-Hedgehog pathway is one of the main mechanisms of action of currently investigated drugs. Other alternatives are based on the concept of an enhancement of the immune response such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, or intra-tumor treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

Although low-risk BCCs are often treated with destructive methods or topical treatments, surgery is the mainstay of treatment for the majority of BCCs. However, several factors may limit the use of surgery in BCC management. Recently, major knowledge on BCCs pathogenesis has led to the development of effective and selective drugs. In our opinion, soon many drugs will be licensed, allowing clinicians to offer patients with BCC the right treatment at the right moment. Certainly, further studies are needed.

Rethinking Antigen Source: Cancer Vaccines Based on Whole Tumor Cell/tissue Lysate or Whole Tumor Cell

Cancer immunotherapies have improved human health, and one among the important technologies for cancer immunotherapy is cancer vaccine. Antigens are the most important components in cancer vaccines. Generally, antigens in cancer vaccines can be divided into two categories: pre-defined antigens and unidentified antigens. Although, cancer vaccines loaded with predefined antigens are commonly used, cancer vaccine loaded with mixed unidentified antigens, especially whole cancer cells or cancer cell lysates, is a very promising approach, and such vaccine can obviate some limitations in cancer vaccines. Their advantages include, but are not limited to, the inclusion of pan-spectra (all or most kinds of) antigens, inducing pan-clones specific T cells, and overcoming the heterogeneity of cancer cells. In this review, the recent advances in cancer vaccines based on whole-tumor antigens, either based on whole cancer cells or whole cancer cell lysates, are summarized. In terms of whole cancer cell lysates, the focus is on applying whole water-soluble cell lysates as antigens. Recently, utilizing the whole cancer cell lysates as antigens in cancer vaccines has become feasible. Considering that pre-determined antigen-based cancer vaccines (mainly peptide-based or mRNA-based) have various limitations, developing cancer vaccines based on whole-tumor antigens is a promising alternative.

Early clinical experience with a degraded 4 MeV electron beam in radiotherapy of superficial basal cell carcinoma

The most common non-melanoma skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Surgery is the gold standard treatment but also non-surgical alternatives are needed. The purpose of this work was to present the early clinical experiences of degraded 4 MeV electron beam as a treatment method for superficial BCC. Twelve patients underwent two weeks radiation therapy treatment with either 5 × 7 Gy or 2 × 12 Gy. There were no significant differences in treatment outcome with different fractionations or lesion locations. The degraded beam method is a safe and valid non-surgical solution for suitable patients with superficial lesions.

Does the histopathological subtype of primary basal cell carcinoma predict the subtype of secondary tumours? What role do genetic mutations play?

Background

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world. The frequency of histopathological subtypes and the distribution on the body of BCC has been well documented. Less has been written on the nature of secondary tumours. The genetics of BCC is starting to be understood, particularly with the advent of newer medical treatments (hedgehog inhibitors).

Objectives

To determine if primary basal cell carcinoma histopathological subtype predicts secondary tumour subtype, as well as their anatomical distribution.

Methods

A retrospective case series of patients over the age of 18 was performed from 2009 to 2014, with at least two separate diagnoses of BCC.

Results

In 394 identified patients, a total of 1355 BCCs arose in the cohort over the 6-year study period. The number of secondary BCCs per patient ranged from 2 to 19 tumours. Nodular BCC was the most likely to reoccur in secondary tumours (53.3%), followed by mixed subtypes (45.7%).

Conclusions

Within our study, we did find a predisposition for secondary BCCs to be of the same histopathological subtype as the primary, particularly with respect to nodular and mixed tumours. Furthermore, we found that secondary tumours were also more likely to occur on the same anatomical site as the primary tumour. We are only just beginning to under the genetic mutations involved in subtype formation.

Deep Shave Removal of Suspected Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the same visit by shave removal may decrease health care spending and promote patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate deep shave removal of lesions clinically suspicious for low-risk BCC on the trunk or extremities in immunocompetent patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Deep shave removal with the intent to remove the entire tumor was performed from January 2015 to June 2016, and patients were followed prospectively for clinical evidence of tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven lesions were removed from 51 patients, including 29 (37%) superficial and nodular BCCs, 27 (35%) superficial BCCs, 16 (21%) nodular BCCs, and 5 (6%) non-BCCs. Fifteen BCCs (21%) had positive residual margins after deep shave removal, which was significantly more likely to occur in nodular compared with superficial BCCs (odds ratio = 7.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-43), and underwent re-excision. Fourteen specimens initially reported to have negative margins after deep shave underwent resectioning, which revealed positive margins in 4 specimens (28.6%). No BCCs have recurred clinically after an average follow-up of 50 months (SE 3.2).

CONCLUSION

Consider deep shave removal for low-risk BCCs on the trunk or extremities in immunocompetent patients hoping to avoid a second treatment visit.

Systematic analysis and case series of the diagnosis and management of trichilemmal carcinoma

Background

Trichilemmal carcinoma (TLC) is a rare malignant cutaneous adnexal neoplasm, with no relatively comprehensive research.

Objective

The aim of this study is to perform an updated statistical analysis so as to better understand TLC's epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment.

Methods

The diagnosis and treatment of three TLC cases in our department were summarized. Then, all TLC cases published in the literature were retrieved for a comprehensive analysis, followed by the analysis of global trends and regional distribution, demographic characteristics, clinical features, pathogenesis, histopathological features, and treatment and prognosis of TLC.

Results

Of the 231 cases, the incidence of TLC has shown an upward trend recently, especially in China, in Asia. The susceptible population is men aged 60-80 and women over 80, and the most prone location is head and neck. The phenotype of TLC is not always typical and may be misdiagnosed because of the coexistence of other diseases. There is a linear relationship between the diameter and its duration or thickness. UV, locally present skin lesions, trauma, scarring, organ transplantation, and genetic disorders may trigger the occurrence of TLC. Periodic acid-Schiff staining and CD34, but not Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), were helpful in the diagnosis of TLC. Although effective, surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery need further improvement to reduce recurrence of TLC. Carcinoma history is an independent risk factor for TLC recurrence.

Limitations

The limitation of this study is the lack of randomized controlled trial on TLC treatment and recurrence.

Conclusion

TLC has the possibility of invasive growth and recurrence, especially in patients with longer duration and carcinoma history.

The current clinical approach to difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor in adult white populations. If BCCs are not treated for years, if they cause massive destruction of the surrounding tissues, if they are considered unresectable or not eligible for radiotherapy they become progressively 'locally advanced' (laBCC) or metastatic (mBCC). These tumors are defined as 'difficult-to-treat BCC.'

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive search on PubMed was conducted to identify relevant literature about the several approved and recommended treatment options for the management of difficult-to-treat BCC published from January 2012 to July 2022. Surgical options, radiotherapy, hedgehog inhibitors, immunotherapy, and combined treatments are discussed. The keywords used were basal cell carcinoma; difficult-to-treat BCC; management of difficult-to-treat BCC; surgical therapy; radiotherapy; hedgehog inhibitors; immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Identifying the best approach to DTT BCCs is one of the main challenges for the dermato-oncologist. The introduction of HHI for the treatment of advanced BCCs has revolutionized the clinical management of DTT BCCs. The immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab has been approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic BCC refractory to HHI therapy or in patients intolerant to HHI therapy. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a key role in managing these complex patients.

The development and validation of a decision aid to facilitate patient choice of surgery versus radiotherapy for high-risk basal cell carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is an increasingly common cancer. For high-risk BCCs, there are several treatment options, with similar efficacies. The current best practice in deciding upon a particular treatment is for a patient-centred approach. At present, there are few resources available for patients to assist their choice. This reduces patient autonomy and increases the burden on clinicians within clinic. Patient decision aids (PDAs) have been shown to increase patient autonomy and facilitate shared decision-making. Currently, there is no published PDA designed to facilitate the decision between surgical management or radiotherapy in high-risk BCCs. We developed a novel decision aid designed along the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to fill this clinical need, and evaluated its acceptance by both patients and clinicians. We describe the challenges faced at initial alpha and subsequent beta testing, and go on to validate our PDA with both the Decisional Conflict Scale and the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDMQ9). We include an example of the PDA and encourage other units to modify the PDA for their own use.

Advances in Management and Therapeutics of Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy in humans with a range of treatment options available. Tumor and patient characteristics aid in risk-stratification, which influences treatment considerations. Here, we review the advancements in surgical, topical, field, immunotherapeutic, molecular-targeted, and experimental treatment modalities that can be employed in the correct clinical setting for the treatment of BCC.

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the most common cancer in humans, is a malignant neoplasm of cells derived from the basal layer of the epidermis. Tumor characteristics such as histologic subtype, primary versus recurrent tumor, anatomic location, size, and patient attributes determine the risk level and acceptable treatment options. Surgical options offer histologic confirmation of tumor clearance. Standard excision provides post-treatment histologic assessment, while Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) provides complete margin assessment intraoperatively. Additional treatment options may be employed in the correct clinical context. Small and low-risk BCCs, broad field cancerization, locally-advanced disease, metastatic disease, cosmetic concerns, or morbidity with surgical approaches raise consideration of other treatment modalities. We review herein a range of treatment approaches and advances in treatments for BCC, including standard excision, MMS, electrodesiccation and curettage, ablative laser treatment, radiation therapy, targeted molecular therapies, topical therapies, field therapies, immunotherapy, and experimental therapies.

Characteristics and management of skin cancers in very elderly patients: A real-world challenge for clinicians

The increase life expectancy led to an expected increase in skin cancer incidence in older patients. Their treatment can require a complex decision-making process. Limited data are available on characteristics, management and outcome of skin tumours in nonagenarian and centenarian patients. The aim of our study was to describe epidemiology, clinical-pathological features and treatment strategies of skin cancers in a cohort of patients aged ≧95 years. A total of 116 patients ≧95 years of age presented for the evaluation of 225 skin lesions (mean of 1.94 lesions per patient). The mean age was 97.4 years, 57.8% were women. Most patients had an ECOG score of 3 (49.3%) or 4 (32%). Lesions were mainly located on the head and neck area (74.2%), upper (7.1%) and lower (6,2%) limbs. The majority of patients presented with non-melanoma skin cancers (183/225; 81.3%), 25/225 (11.1%) had actinic keratosis, 5 (2.2%) melanoma and 2 (0.9%) atypical fibroxanthoma. Forty-eight lesions (21.3%) were treated with surgery, 58 (25.8%) with radiotherapy. The management of 73 lesion (32.4%) was discussed at the multidisciplinary tumour board meeting. One patient died for the progression of a squamous cell carcinoma; 74 patients died for causes unrelated to skin tumours, 36 are still alive after a mean follow-up of 27.27 months. This cohort study confirms that age is not per se a contraindication for treatment of skin cancers in elderly patients. Our results support the importance of a patient-centred care approach that should take into consideration patient's preferences, comorbidities, compliance and possible adverse events.

Development of a Core Outcome Set for Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Including Low-Risk and Advanced Tumors

BACKGROUND

There is variation in the outcomes reported in clinical studies of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). This can prevent effective meta-analyses to answer important clinical questions.

OBJECTIVE

To identify a recommended minimum set of core outcomes for BCC clinical trials.

METHODS

Patient and professional Delphi process to cull a long-list, culminating in a consensus meeting. To be provisionally accepted, outcomes needed to be deemed 'important' (score: 7-9, of maximum of 9) by 70% of each stakeholder group.

RESULTS

235 candidate outcomes identified via a systematic literature review and survey of key stakeholders were reduced to 74 that were rated by 100 health care professionals and patients in two Delphi rounds. 27 outcomes were provisionally accepted. The final core set of 5 agreed-upon outcomes after the consensus meeting was: complete response; persistent or serious adverse events; recurrence-free survival; quality of life; and patient satisfaction, including with cosmetic outcome.

LIMITATIONS

English-speaking patients and professionals rated outcomes extracted from English-language studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A core outcome set (COS) for basal cell carcinoma has been developed. Use of relevant measures may improve the utility of clinical research and the quality of therapeutic guidance available to clinicians.

A Profile and Three-Year Follow-Up of Patients with Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Western Cape, South Africa

Background

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is an important malignancy in sub-Saharan Africa. There is a paucity of data regarding BCC in South Africa.

Aims

To describe the clinicopathological features of patients presenting with BCC in a cohort of South African patients.

Methods

This retrospective descriptive study reviewed the medical records of 149 patients with BCC who attended the dermatology clinic at Tygerberg Academic Hospital from September 2015 to August 2016. Demographic and clinical data of those patients with histologically proven BCC were retrieved from clinical records. The data included the assessment for BCC recurrence after three years (September 2016–August 2019).

Results

Of 390 patients, 155 (39.7%) had histologically confirmed BCCs. Complete medical records were available for 149 of these patients, and most were male (55.7%) and white (85.9%) with a median age of 70 years. Most patients had their BCC lesions for 12 months (43.1%) before diagnosis. BCCs were mostly located on the head and neck area (58.1%). In most patients (72.0%), a diagnostic punch biopsy confirmed BCC. Plastic surgeons subsequently excised the BCC lesions in 74.0% of these patients. The most common histological subtype was nodular BCC (74.0%). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk of recurrence was approximately evenly distributed between high- (54.1%) and low-risk groups (45.9%). The major high-risk feature was the location (36.6%). Histologically confirmed BCC recurrence occurred in 9 of the 149 patients (3.7%) over three years.

Conclusions

BCC represents a high burden of disease in our setting. Compared to existing studies, the BCCs in this study are clinically and histologically similar to international reports.

An update on local and systemic therapies for non-melanoma skin cancer

INTRODUCTION

Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) as a group exceed the incidence of all other malignancies combined. NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. As the incidence continues to rise, it is important to appreciate the available treatment options.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses the treatment of NMSC though surgical, topical, regional, and systemic modalities.

EXPERT OPINION

As there are many treatment options available for these diseases, selection of the appropriate method can be difficult. With time, we expect treatment decisions to become even more complex and personalized. The role of systemic immunotherapies and neoadjuvant therapies in the treatment of NMSC is still not well defined. Local treatment with intralesional injections and isolated limb infusion may prove to be promising alternative therapies.

Contact skin radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers during COVID-19 pandemic

In the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, it is important to ensure the quality of cancer treatment as well as patients and health professionals' safety. Individual-based treatment options should be considered in patients with advanced epithelial skin cancer, who are typically elderly and frail. Aim of this study was to assess feasibility and safety of Contact Skin Radiation Therapy (CSRT) to treat basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Patients with advanced and difficult-to-treat BCC or SCC were discussed at skin multidisciplinary tumor board (S-MDTB) from February the 21st to May the 4th (phase 1 Italian Pandemic) and retrospectively analyzed. Patient's triage following internal recommendations was daily performed. CSRT was delivered in 8 fractions of 5 Gy each, twice a day. Beyond the clinical outcomes, treatment success indicators, such as the completion of CSRT without SARS-CoV-2 occurrence, were identified to evaluate the feasibility of CSRT during pandemic. A post-treatment psychological assessment regarding patient's safety perception was performed. Six male patients (median age 80 years; range 62-92) with histologically confirmed BCC or SCC were treated with CSRT. Complete clinical remission was achieved in 5/6 patients (83.4%). No high-grade acute toxicities occurred during treatment. No patients or healthcare personnel developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. All the treatment success indicators were achieved. CSRT represents a safe, and feasible treatment option even during the pandemic emergency period. Hypofractionation could be an option to reduce total number of fractions and, consequently, infective risk exposition.

Radiation therapy of cutaneous cancers

We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on radiotherapy of cutaneous cancers. The indications of radiotherapy for skin cancers are not clearly defined because of the lack of randomized trials or prospective studies. For basal cell carcinomas, radiotherapy frequently offers a good local control, but a randomized trial showed that surgery is more efficient and less toxic. Indications of radiotherapy are contra-indications of surgery for patients older than 60, non-sclerodermiform histology and located in non-sensitive areas. Adjuvant radiotherapy could be proposed to squamous cell carcinomas, in case of poor prognostic factors. Dose of 60 to 70Gy are usually required, and must be modulated to the size of the lesions. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems beneficial for desmoplastic melanomas but not for the other histological types. Prophylactic nodal irradiation (45 to 50Gy), for locally advanced tumors (massive nodal involvement), decreases the locoregional failure rate but do not increase survival. Adjuvant radio- therapy (50 to 56Gy) for Merkel cell carcinomas increases also the local control rate, as demonstrated by meta-analysis and a large epidemiological study. Nodal areas must be included, if there is no surgical exploration (sentinel lymph node dissection). Kaposi sarcomas are radiosensitive and could be treated with relatively low doses (24 to 30Gy). Also, cutaneous lymphomas are good indications for radiotherapy: B lymphomas are electively treated with limited fields. The role of total skin electron therapy for T-lymphomas is still discussed; but palliative radiotherapy is very efficient in case of cutaneous nodules.

Risk Factors and Rate of Recurrence after Mohs Surgery in Basal Cell and Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort (REGESMOHS, Spanish Registry of Mohs Surgery)

Randomized studies to assess the efficacy of Mohs micrographic surgery in basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas are limited by methodological and ethical issues and a lack of long follow-up periods. This study presents the “real-life” results of a nationwide 7-years cohort on basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. A prospective cohort was conducted in 22 Spanish centres (from July 2013 to February 2020) and a multivariate analysis, including characteristics of patients, tumours, surgeries and follow-up, was performed. A total of 4,402 patients followed up for 12,111 patientyears for basal cell carcinoma, and 371 patients with 915 patient-years of follow-up for squamous cell carcinoma were recruited. Risk factors for recurrence included age, non-primary tumours and more stages or unfinished surgeries for both tumours, and immunosuppression for squamous cell carcinoma. Incidence rates of recurrence were 1.3 per 100 person-years for basal cell carcinoma (95% confidence interval 1.1– 1.5) and 4.5 for squamous cell carcinoma (95% confidence interval 3.3–6.1), being constant over time (0–5 years). In conclusion, follow-up strategies should be equally intense for at least the first 5 years, with special attention paid to squamous cell carcinoma (especially in immunosuppressed patients), elderly patients, non-primary tumours, and those procedures requiring more stages, or unfinished surgeries.

Quantitative intracellular oxygen availability before and after 5-aminolevulinic acid skin photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND

During photodynamic therapy (PDT) oxygen is transformed into reactive oxygen species (ROS) to induce cellular apoptosis in (pre)malignant cells. Real time oxygen availability measurement is clinically available with the Cellular Oxygen Metabolism (COMET) monitor.

METHODS

Primary objective is to show that mitochondrial oxygen availability (mitoPO₂) measurement is possible during clinical ALA-PDT. The secondary aim was to determine the pain sensation, because it is the most commonly reported side effect of PDT. Before and after the two fraction PDT treatment, with a 2-hour dark period, mitoPO₂ was measured and reported pain was documented with a visual analog scale (VAS) 0-100.

RESULTS

Nine patients were included. Before the first PDT session the median signal quality was [IQR] 55.0% [34.2-68.0], which decreased after session one to 0% [0.0-10.0]. MitoPO₂ was 40.0 [17.7-53.8] mmHg and increased afterwards to 61.8 [38.2-64.8] mmHg. This likely the result of the delay time between the illumination stop and the mitoPO₂ measurements in a vasodilated, visibly red lesion. Before session two signal quality was 10.4% [0-20.15], 40% lower than at the start. In 5 patients the signal quality after session 2 was too low because of photobleaching and insufficient regeneration of PpIX, median 0% [0-10]. Subjects reported low median VAS scores, all below 3, directly after the mitoPO₂ measurements.

CONCLUSION

With COMET we were able to reliably measure mitochondrial oxygen concentrations during photodynamic therapy. Signal quality drastically decreases after a PDT session because of PpIX deterioration during the illumination phase.

Metastatic and locally aggressive BCC: Current treatment options

The treatment of locally advanced and metastatic BCC presents a significant clinical challenge. Treatment options have evolved recently to include the use of hedgehog inhibitors Vismodigib and Sonidigib and immunotherapy with Cemiplimab.

Known and new facts on basal cell carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor in light‐skinned people and amounts to about 75 % of all cases of skin cancer. Increasing incidence rates have been reported for decades all over the world. The main risk factors include UV radiation, male sex, light skin type, advanced age, long‐term immunosuppression, a positive individual or family history, and certain genodermatoses. BCC metastasizes only rarely, and its mortality is low, but it is associated with significant morbidity. Genetic mutations especially in the hedgehog pathway play an important role in BCC pathogenesis. Non‐invasive procedures such as optical coherence tomography or confocal laser scan microscopy are increasingly utilized for diagnostics in addition to visual inspection and dermatoscopy, but only in exceptional cases can histological confirmation of the diagnosis be dispensed with. Various clinical and histological subtypes have been defined. Differentiating between BCC with high and low risk of recurrence has a significant influence on the choice of treatment. Most BCC can be treated effectively and safely with standard surgery, or in selected cases with topical treatment. Locally advanced and metastasized BCC must be treated with radiation or systemic therapy. Radiation is also an option for older patients with contraindications for surgery. The hedgehog inhibitors vismodegib and sonidegib are currently approved for systemic therapy of BCC in Europe. Approval for the PD1 inhibitor cemiplimab as second‐line therapy is expected in the near future.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: an individual patient data network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other.

METHODS

We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies).

FINDINGS

115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRT_P) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRT_P (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (IC_TaxPF-LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and IC_TaxPF followed by CLRT (80%).

INTERPRETATION

The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or IC_TaxPF-CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

FUNDINGS

French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer using tailored custom moulds - a single-centre experience

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse tumour control, toxicity, and aesthetic outcome of patients affected by non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treated with 192 Ir high-dose-rate (HDR)-brachytherapy (BT) at the Division of Radiotherapy, University of Pisa.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2014 to December 2019 we treated 37 patients (median age 79 years; range 31-91 years) affected by NMSC, with the following histological subtypes: 62.2% basal cell carcinoma and 37.8% squamous cell carcinoma. We analysed 40 lesions with a depth ≤ 5 mm, located in 40.0% scalp, 17.5% nose, 25.0% face, and 17.5% ear, all treated with 192 Ir-based HDR-BT, using tailored custom moulds, with a median of 5 catheters (range, 1-9) spaced 1 cm apart. The most common fractionation scheme was 40 Gy in 8 daily fractions; the biological effective dose was 60 Gy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 3-70 months). The 2-year local control rate was 90%. Common terminology criteria for adverse event (CTCAE vs. 5.0) G1 toxicities were dermatitis (52%), pain (25%), and ulceration (22%). The only G2 acute toxicities were dermatitis and ulceration. The most common G1 late toxicities were fibrosis (17%), atrophy (15%), and hypopigmentation (12%). No G3 or higher acute or late toxicity was reported. Excellent cosmetic results were observed in 65.0% of the lesions; only 1 case (2.5%) reported a poor cosmetic result.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface mould HDR-BT is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment modality for NMSC and can be considered a good alternative, especially for elderly patients who are often unfit for surgery.

An international 3-center training and reading study to assess basal cell carcinoma surgical margins with ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND

Novel solutions are needed for expediting margin assessment to guide basal cell carcinoma (BCC) surgeries. Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) is starting to be used in freshly excised surgical specimens to examine BCC margins in real time. Training and educational process are needed for this novel technology to be implemented into clinic.

OBJECTIVE

To test a training and reading process, and measure diagnostic accuracy of clinicians with varying expertise level in reading ex vivo FCM images.

METHODS

An international three-center study was designed for training and reading to assess BCC surgical margins and residual subtypes. Each center included a lead dermatologic/Mohs surgeon (clinical developer of FCM) and three additional readers (dermatologist, dermatopathologist, dermatologic/Mohs surgeon), who use confocal in clinical practice. Testing was conducted on 30 samples.

RESULTS

Overall, the readers achieved 90% average sensitivity, 78% average specificity in detecting residual BCC margins, showing high and consistent diagnostic reading accuracy. Those with expertise in dermatologic surgery and dermatopathology showed the strongest potential for learning to assess FCM images.

LIMITATIONS

Small dataset, variability in mosaic quality between centers.

CONCLUSION

Suggested process is feasible and effective. This process is proposed for wider implementation to facilitate wider adoption of FCM to potentially expedite BCC margin assessment to guide surgery in real time.

A retrospective comparative study of outcome with surgical excision and repair versus nonsurgical and ablative treatments for basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There are few studies on basal cell carcinoma (BCC) from India. Long-term follow-up is available in only one study and the aesthetic outcome of treatment has not been evaluated in Indian patients.

AIMS

In this retrospective study on BCC, we compared treatment failure, recurrence rates and aesthetic outcomes on long-term follow-up between surgical excision and repair, and nonsurgical and ablative treatments.

METHODS

Records of patients with BCC treated in the dermatologic surgery clinic over the past 10 years were analyzed. Patients with histopathologically confirmed BCC who could be contacted were evaluated for recurrence, treatment failure, overall satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes by global aesthetic improvement scale.

RESULTS

Out of 98 patients, 72 were contactable. Four patients received both nonsurgical and ablative treatments and surgical excision and repair sequentially and were excluded. The mean age of patients was 57.9 ± 15.8 years (24-90 years) and the male: female ratio was 1.6:1. The most common site involved was the face (72.1%) followed by trunk and scalp, and the most common type of BCC was the pigmented superficial type (33.8%), followed by the pigmented noduloulcerative type (16.2%). There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of high-risk cases. The mean follow-up period was 37.1 ± 31.4 (range, 4-120) months. Fifty one patients were treated with surgical excision and repair, and 17 with nonsurgical and ablative treatments (9-imiquimod, 5-cryotherapy, 4-radiotherapy). Treatment failure was seen in 5 (7.4%) patients, all in the nonsurgical and ablative treatments group (P = 0.0006). Recurrence was seen in 2 (2.9%) patients, both in the surgical excision and repair group (P > 0.05). Mean patient satisfaction was significantly higher with surgical excision and repair, though there was no significant difference in the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale between the groups.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size was low. Only telephonic and pictorial assessments were done where the patient could not come for follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical excision and repair was associated with better outcomes than nonsurgical and ablative treatments. Treatment failures and adverse events were high with nonsurgical and ablative treatments. The recurrence rate was low.

p75NTR/proBDNF Modulates Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Immune Microenvironment via Necroptosis Signaling Pathway

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer. While most of the basal cell carcinomas were localized lesion and can be easily managed, the treatment options to the advanced basal cell carcinomas are still remarkably limited. In recent years, proBDNF and its receptor p75NTR have been reported to play important roles in various diseases, including cancers and psychotic disorders. However, the role of p75NTR/proBDNF signaling in basal cell carcinoma remains unclear. Here, we found that the expression level of p75NTR/proBDNF was decreased in basal cell carcinoma patient samples and cell lines. In vitro study showed overexpression of p75NTR/proBDNF could significantly facilitate tumor cell death, including inflammatory-silent apoptosis and lytic inflammatory activated necroptosis. In vivo study showed overexpression of p75NTR/proBDNF dramatically promotes tumor-associated macrophage (M1) and T cell recruitment in a syngeneic mouse model of BCC. These results show a crucial role for p75NTR/proBDNF signaling in basal cell carcinoma immune microenvironment.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent skin malignancy, with incidence increasing worldwide. Most BCC can be cured with local treatments (surgery or topical therapies), but advanced or recurrent forms require specific therapies. Significant developments targeting the sonic hedgehog signalization pathway have been made in the past years, paving the way for new therapies.Areas covered: This review details emerging drugs for BCC treatment, focusing on topical, intra-tumoral, and systemic therapies, such as new targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A literature search was conducted to identify ongoing studies using PudMed database and clinicaltrials.gov website.Expert opinion: Although surgery is and will probably remain the gold-standard therapy for BCC, treatment of recurrent, advanced, and metastatic tumors is evolving. Emergence of tumors resistant to targeted therapies lead the way to new approaches. Topical and intra-tumoral treatments represent alternatives to surgical morbidity, and many studies are ongoing. The first results of immune checkpoint inhibitors are encouraging in advanced and metastatic forms of the disease. New targeted therapies are needed to overcome or prevent the resistance to standard hedgehog pathway inhibitors.

Preventing complications in dermatologic surgery: Presurgical concerns

Cutaneous surgery has become critical to comprehensive dermatologic care, and dermatologists must therefore be equipped to manage the risks associated with surgical procedures. Complications may occur at any point along the continuum of care, and therefore assessing, managing, and preventing risk from beginning to end becomes essential. This review focuses on preventing surgical complications pre- and postoperatively as well as during the surgical procedure.

The Evolving Story of Laser Therapeutics for Basal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The increasing burden from basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has stimulated the development of alternative treatments for these tumors.

OBJECTIVE

This review focuses on upcoming laser treatments for BCC and highlights the limitations of these therapies.

METHODS

A PUBMED search was conducted for articles on laser therapy of BCC. Key studies involving lasers to treat BCC were reviewed. Novel approaches to BCC are also described.

RESULTS

Vascular-specific laser therapy has increasingly been studied as an addition in the therapeutic armamentarium of BCC. Although these studies demonstrate efficacy for nonaggressive BCC, optimization of this technique is ongoing to minimize scarring. A more targeted approach to the treatment of BCC, such as immunized photothermal therapy or laser-assisted chemotherapeutic delivery, may result in less scarring, while maintaining efficacy similar to that of lasers targeting tumor vasculature.

CONCLUSION

Vascular-specific laser therapies show promise in treating low-risk BCC; however, scarring is not an uncommon adverse event. Although only animal studies have been performed to date, laser-activated gold nanoparticle therapy and laser-assisted drug delivery of vismodegib are potential therapies that theoretically confer a more selective approach. Laser modalities demonstrate promise in the treatment of nonaggressive BCC, although long-term studies have yet to be published.

Laser Treatment for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer. Lasers are an additional option.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the literature on the efficacy and safety of lasers for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of laser treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer was performed. The primary outcome was recurrence rate (RR).

RESULTS

The review included 32 studies (six randomized controlled trials and 26 cohort studies): 27 evaluated basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), three squamous cell carcinomas, and two both, for a total of 4755 BCCs and 214 squamous cell carcinoas. Most BCCs were low risk. The Nd:YAG laser (seven studies, 3286 BCCs) had a 3.1% RR (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.4%) during a mean follow-up of 7.9 years, with a low rate (< 20%) of scarring and dyspigmentation. The CO₂ laser (ten studies, 904 BCCs) had a 9.4% RR (95% CI 4.1-20) during a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, with a low rate of side effects. The pulsed dye laser (eight studies, 206 BCCs) had a 38% RR (95% CI 24-55). In two studies, the Nd:YAG laser demonstrated a RR of 10% (95% CI 2-31) for Bowen's disease, and in three studies, the CO₂ laser demonstrated a RR of 22% (95% CI 5-61) for squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on cohort studies, the Nd:YAG laser is a safe and efficacious modality for the treatment of low-risk BCC. Based on settings applied in prior studies in the literature, the CO₂ laser is less efficacious than the Nd:YAG laser, thus it cannot be recommended for BCC treatment. Insufficient data preclude conclusions regarding laser treatment for squamous cell carcinoma.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42019129717.

Clinical efficacy of Mohs surgery combined with topical photodynamic therapy for facial basal cell carcinoma

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of Mohs surgery in combination with topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) for facial basal cell carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Eighty-six patients with facial basal cell carcinoma treated in our department from April 2011 to December 2013 were included. Mohs surgery was used to remove the lesions followed by direct suturing, skin flap grafting, or medium thickness free-skin grafting to repair the incisions. Topical PDT was performed three times, at an interval of 2 weeks, immediately after the sutures were removed. The patients were followed up for 2 years after the operation to evaluate tumor recurrence.

Results

Recurrence was not observed within 1 year after Mohs surgery combining PDT; however, one case of recurrence was found at the 2-year follow-up.

Conclusion

The efficacy of Mohs surgery combining topical PDT is a definite treatment for facial basal cell carcinomas, as it reduced the tumor recurrence rate and maintained the relative integrity of the local tissues and appearance. This method could be a new effective treatment method for the facial basal cell carcinoma.

Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancers in the Absence of Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Non-melanoma skin cancers are the most common malignancies globally. Although non-melanoma skin cancers exhibit low metastatic potential, they can be locally destructive, necessitating complex excisions and reconstructions. Mohs micrographic surgery is the gold-standard treatment for high-risk non-melanoma skin cancers in patients who are appropriate surgical candidates. Despite its efficacy, Mohs micrographic surgery is not readily available in most geographic regions, necessitating that plastic surgeons be well-versed in alternative treatment modalities for non-melanoma skin cancer. Herein, we will discuss the management of non-melanoma skin cancers in settings where Mohs micrographic surgery is not readily available.

Photodynamic Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma: The Clinical Context for Future Research Priorities

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established treatment option for low-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC). BCC is the most common human cancer and also a convenient cancer in which to study PDT treatment. This review clarifies challenges to researchers evident from the clinical use of PDT in BCC treatment. It outlines the context of PDT and how PDT treatments for BCC have been developed hitherto. The sections examine the development of systemic and subsequently topical photosensitizers, light delivery regimens, and the use of PDT in different patient populations and subtypes of BCC. The outcomes of topical PDT are discussed in comparison with alternative treatments, and topical PDT applications in combination and adjuvant therapy are considered. The intention is to summarize the clinical relevance and expose areas of research need in the BCC context, ultimately to facilitate improvements in PDT treatment.

Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest cancer affecting white-skinned individuals, and worldwide incidence is increasing. Although rarely fatal, BCC is associated with significant morbidity and costs. First-line treatment is usually surgical excision, but alternatives are available. New published studies and the development of non-surgical treatments meant an update of our Cochrane Review (first published in 2003, and previously updated in 2007) was timely.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for BCC in immunocompetent adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to November 2019: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and LILACS.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for BCC in immunocompetent adults with histologically-proven, primary BCC. Eligible comparators were placebo, active treatment, other treatments, or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcome measures were recurrence at three years and five years (measured clinically) (we included recurrence data outside of these time points if there was no measurement at three or five years) and participant- and observer-rated good/excellent cosmetic outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain during and after treatment, early treatment failure within six months, and adverse effects (AEs). We used GRADE to assess evidence certainty for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 52 RCTs (26 new) involving 6690 participants (median 89) in this update. All studies recruited from secondary care outpatient clinics. More males than females were included. Study duration ranged from six weeks to 10 years (average 13 months). Most studies (48/52) included only low-risk BCC (superficial (sBCC) and nodular (nBCC) histological subtypes). The majority of studies were at low or unclear risk of bias for most domains. Twenty-two studies were industry-funded: commercial sponsors conducted most of the studies assessing imiquimod, and just under half of the photodynamic therapy (PDT) studies. Overall, surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates. For high-risk facial BCC (high-risk histological subtype or located in the facial 'H-zone' or both), there may be slightly fewer recurrences with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) compared to surgical excision (SE) at three years (1.9% versus 2.9%, respectively) (risk ratio (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 2.64; 1 study, 331 participants; low-certainty evidence) and at five years (3.2% versus 5.2%, respectively) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.04; 1 study, 259 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, the 95% CI also includes the possibility of increased risk of recurrence and no difference between treatments. There may be little to no difference regarding improvement of cosmetic outcomes between MMS and SE, judged by participants and observers 18 months post-operatively (one study; low-certainty evidence); however, no raw data were available for this outcome. When comparing imiquimod and SE for nBCC or sBCC at low-risk sites, imiquimod probably results in more recurrences than SE at three years (16.4% versus 1.6%, respectively) (RR 10.30, 95% CI 3.22 to 32.94; 1 study, 401 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and five years (17.5% versus 2.3%, respectively) (RR 7.73, 95% CI 2.81 to 21.3; 1 study, 383 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in the number of participant-rated good/excellent cosmetic outcomes (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06; 1 study, 326 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, imiquimod may result in greater numbers of good/excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to SE when observer-rated (60.6% versus 35.6%, respectively) (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.15; 1 study, 344 participants; low-certainty evidence). Both cosmetic outcomes were measured at three years. Based on one study of 347 participants with high- and low-risk primary BCC of the face, radiotherapy may result in more recurrences compared to SE under frozen section margin control at three years (5.2% versus 0%, respectively) (RR 19.11, 95% CI 1.12 to 325.78; low-certainty evidence) and at four years (6.4% versus 0.6%, respectively) (RR 11.06, 95% CI 1.44 to 84.77; low-certainty evidence). Radiotherapy probably results in a smaller number of good participant- (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91; 50.3% versus 66.1%, respectively) or observer-rated (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.62; 28.9% versus 60.3%, respectively) good/excellent cosmetic outcomes compared to SE, when measured at four years, where dyspigmentation and telangiectasia can occur (both moderate-certainty evidence). Methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT may result in more recurrences compared to SE at three years (36.4% versus 0%, respectively) (RR 26.47, 95% CI 1.63 to 429.92; 1 study; 68 participants with low-risk nBCC in the head and neck area; low-certainty evidence). There were no useable data for measurement at five years. MAL-PDT probably results in greater numbers of participant- (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.27; 97.3% versus 82.5%) or observer-rated (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.26; 87.1% versus 46.6%) good/excellent cosmetic outcomes at one year compared to SE (2 studies, 309 participants with low-risk nBCC and sBCC; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on moderate-certainty evidence (single low-risk sBCC), imiquimod probably results in fewer recurrences at three years compared to MAL-PDT (22.8% versus 51.6%, respectively) (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.62; 277 participants) and five years (28.6% versus 68.6%, respectively) (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.57; 228 participants). There is probably little to no difference in numbers of observer-rated good/excellent cosmetic outcomes at one year (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.16; 370 participants). Participant-rated cosmetic outcomes were not measured for this comparison. AEs with surgical interventions include wound infections, graft necrosis and post-operative bleeding. Local AEs such as itching, weeping, pain and redness occur frequently with non-surgical interventions. Treatment-related AEs resulting in study modification or withdrawal occurred with imiquimod and MAL-PDT.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Surgical interventions have the lowest recurrence rates, and there may be slightly fewer recurrences with MMS over SE for high-risk facial primary BCC (low-certainty evidence). Non-surgical treatments, when used for low-risk BCC, are less effective than surgical treatments, but recurrence rates are acceptable and cosmetic outcomes are probably superior. Of the non-surgical treatments, imiquimod has the best evidence to support its efficacy. Overall, evidence certainty was low to moderate. Priorities for future research include core outcome measures and studies with longer-term follow-up.

Beyond Mohs surgery and excisions: A focused review of treatment options for subtypes of basal cell carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer. It originates from undifferentiated cells in the basal cell layer of the epidermis or from the outer root sheath of the hair follicle. The most important factor in development of BCC is ultraviolet radiation. Surgery is considered the gold standard of treatment for BCC. However, nonsurgical options are available for individuals who are unsuitable for surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarize the efficacy and indications of alternative, nonsurgical treatments that can be used in the management of BCC. An extensive literature review was performed for the nonsurgical options for the treatment of BCC. Resources searched included PubMed and Google Scholars, limited to the years 1995 to 2020. Key words searched included BCC, destructive methods, photodynamic therapy (PDT), radiotherapy, topical medication, laser, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs). The most relevant results such as systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, or comparative studies were selected to provide a summary for the most common nonsurgical methods used for treating BCC. Effective nonsurgical treatments for BCC include destructive methods (eg, curettage alone, cryosurgery, or electrodessication), PDT, topical medications, radiotherapy, laser, and HPIs. Nonsurgical therapeutic alternatives are safe and effective for the treatment of BCC. Factors such as tumor location, size, and histopathological subtype should be taken into consideration when selecting optimal treatment. In addition to clinical factors, cosmetic results and patient preference should be considered.

Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers: Biological and Clinical Features

Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) include basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). These neoplasms are highly diverse in their clinical presentation, as well as in their biological evolution. While the deregulation of the Hedgehog pathway is commonly observed in BCC, SCC and MCC are characterized by a strikingly elevated mutational and neoantigen burden. As result of our improved understanding of the biology of non-melanoma skin cancers, innovative treatment options including inhibitors of the Hedgehog pathway and immunotherapeutic agents have been recently investigated against these malignancies, leading to their approval by regulatory authorities. Herein, we review the most relevant biological and clinical features of NMSC, focusing on innovative treatment approaches.