1
|
Pang MM, Chen F, Xie M, Druckmann S, Clandinin TR, Yang HH. A recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila temporally sharpens visual inputs. Curr Biol 2024:S0960-9822(24)01631-2. [PMID: 39706173 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.11.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024]
Abstract
A critical goal of vision is to detect changes in light intensity, even when these changes are blurred by the spatial resolution of the eye and the motion of the animal. Here, we describe a recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila that compensates for blur and thereby selectively enhances the perceived contrast of moving edges. Using in vivo, two-photon voltage imaging, we measured the temporal response properties of L1 and L2, two cell types that receive direct synaptic input from photoreceptors. These neurons have biphasic responses to brief flashes of light, a hallmark of cells that encode changes in stimulus intensity. However, the second phase was often much larger in area than the first, creating an unusual temporal filter. Genetic dissection revealed that recurrent neural circuitry strongly shapes the second phase of the response, informing the structure of a dynamical model. By applying this model to moving natural images, we demonstrate that rather than veridically representing stimulus changes, this temporal processing strategy systematically enhances them, amplifying and sharpening responses. Comparing the measured responses of L2 to model predictions across both artificial and natural stimuli revealed that L2 tunes its properties as the model predicts to temporally sharpen visual inputs. Since this strategy is tunable to behavioral context, generalizable to any time-varying sensory input, and implementable with a common circuit motif, we propose that it could be broadly used to selectively enhance sharp and salient changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Pang
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Marjorie Xie
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Shaul Druckmann
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Thomas R Clandinin
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Helen H Yang
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gou T, Matulis CA, Clark DA. Adaptation to visual sparsity enhances responses to isolated stimuli. Curr Biol 2024; 34:5697-5713.e8. [PMID: 39577424 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024]
Abstract
Sensory systems adapt their response properties to the statistics of their inputs. For instance, visual systems adapt to low-order statistics like mean and variance to encode stimuli efficiently or to facilitate specific downstream computations. However, it remains unclear how other statistical features affect sensory adaptation. Here, we explore how Drosophila's visual motion circuits adapt to stimulus sparsity, a measure of the signal's intermittency not captured by low-order statistics alone. Early visual neurons in both ON and OFF pathways alter their responses dramatically with stimulus sparsity, responding positively to both light and dark sparse stimuli but linearly to dense stimuli. These changes extend to downstream ON and OFF direction-selective neurons, which are activated by sparse stimuli of both polarities but respond with opposite signs to light and dark regions of dense stimuli. Thus, sparse stimuli activate both ON and OFF pathways, recruiting a larger fraction of the circuit and potentially enhancing the salience of isolated stimuli. Overall, our results reveal visual response properties that increase the fraction of the circuit responding to sparse, isolated stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Gou
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | | | - Damon A Clark
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Quantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tyszka A, Szypulski K, Pyza E, Damulewicz M. Autophagy in the retina affects photoreceptor synaptic plasticity and behavior. JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 161:104741. [PMID: 39662838 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2024.104741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2024] [Revised: 12/08/2024] [Accepted: 12/08/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
The visual system is a sensory system which is sensitive to light and detects photic stimuli. It plays many important functions, such as vision, circadian clock entrainment and regulation of sleep-wake behavior. The interconnection between the visual system and clock network is precisely regulated. The outer layer of the visual system called the retina, is composed of opsin-based photoreceptors that, in addition to visual information, provide photic information for the circadian clock, which in turn, regulates daily rhythms, such as activity and sleep patterns. The retina houses its own circadian oscillators (belonging to peripheral oscillators), however, they are also controlled by the main clock (pacemaker). Photoreceptor cells show many clock and light-dependent rhythms, such as the rhythms in synaptic plasticity or rhodopsin turnover, but their precise regulation is still not completely understood. In this study, we provided evidence that one of the mechanisms involved in the regulation of retinal rhythms is autophagy. We showed that autophagy is rhythmic in photoreceptors, with a specific daily pattern of autophagosome levels in different cells. Moreover, our data suggest that rhythmic autophagy-dependent degradation of the presynaptic protein Bruchpilot or photosensitive rhodopsin is involved in the regulation of daily rhythms observed in the retina. In effect, autophagy disruption in the photoreceptors, which affects photic signal transmission to the main clock neurons, causes changes in sleep level and pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Tyszka
- Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Kornel Szypulski
- Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Elzbieta Pyza
- Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Milena Damulewicz
- Department of Cell Biology and Imaging, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gür B, Ramirez L, Cornean J, Thurn F, Molina-Obando S, Ramos-Traslosheros G, Silies M. Neural pathways and computations that achieve stable contrast processing tuned to natural scenes. Nat Commun 2024; 15:8580. [PMID: 39362859 PMCID: PMC11450186 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52724-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Natural scenes are highly dynamic, challenging the reliability of visual processing. Yet, humans and many animals perform accurate visual behaviors, whereas computer vision devices struggle with rapidly changing background luminance. How does animal vision achieve this? Here, we reveal the algorithms and mechanisms of rapid luminance gain control in Drosophila, resulting in stable visual processing. We identify specific transmedullary neurons as the site of luminance gain control, which pass this property to direction-selective cells. The circuitry further involves wide-field neurons, matching computational predictions that local spatial pooling drive optimal contrast processing in natural scenes when light conditions change rapidly. Experiments and theory argue that a spatially pooled luminance signal achieves luminance gain control via divisive normalization. This process relies on shunting inhibition using the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluClα. Our work describes how the fly robustly processes visual information in dynamically changing natural scenes, a common challenge of all visual systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Gür
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- The Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research (FMI), Basel, Switzerland
| | - Luisa Ramirez
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Cornean
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Freya Thurn
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Molina-Obando
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Giordano Ramos-Traslosheros
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marion Silies
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lappalainen JK, Tschopp FD, Prakhya S, McGill M, Nern A, Shinomiya K, Takemura SY, Gruntman E, Macke JH, Turaga SC. Connectome-constrained networks predict neural activity across the fly visual system. Nature 2024; 634:1132-1140. [PMID: 39261740 PMCID: PMC11525180 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07939-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
We can now measure the connectivity of every neuron in a neural circuit1-9, but we cannot measure other biological details, including the dynamical characteristics of each neuron. The degree to which measurements of connectivity alone can inform the understanding of neural computation is an open question10. Here we show that with experimental measurements of only the connectivity of a biological neural network, we can predict the neural activity underlying a specified neural computation. We constructed a model neural network with the experimentally determined connectivity for 64 cell types in the motion pathways of the fruit fly optic lobe1-5 but with unknown parameters for the single-neuron and single-synapse properties. We then optimized the values of these unknown parameters using techniques from deep learning11, to allow the model network to detect visual motion12. Our mechanistic model makes detailed, experimentally testable predictions for each neuron in the connectome. We found that model predictions agreed with experimental measurements of neural activity across 26 studies. Our work demonstrates a strategy for generating detailed hypotheses about the mechanisms of neural circuit function from connectivity measurements. We show that this strategy is more likely to be successful when neurons are sparsely connected-a universally observed feature of biological neural networks across species and brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne K Lappalainen
- Machine Learning in Science, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany
- Tübingen AI Center, Tübingen, Germany
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Fabian D Tschopp
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Sridhama Prakhya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Mason McGill
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
- Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Shin-Ya Takemura
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Eyal Gruntman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
- Dept of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jakob H Macke
- Machine Learning in Science, Tübingen University, Tübingen, Germany
- Tübingen AI Center, Tübingen, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Srinivas C Turaga
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matsliah A, Yu SC, Kruk K, Bland D, Burke AT, Gager J, Hebditch J, Silverman B, Willie KP, Willie R, Sorek M, Sterling AR, Kind E, Garner D, Sancer G, Wernet MF, Kim SS, Murthy M, Seung HS. Neuronal parts list and wiring diagram for a visual system. Nature 2024; 634:166-180. [PMID: 39358525 PMCID: PMC11446827 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07981-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
A catalogue of neuronal cell types has often been called a 'parts list' of the brain1, and regarded as a prerequisite for understanding brain function2,3. In the optic lobe of Drosophila, rules of connectivity between cell types have already proven to be essential for understanding fly vision4,5. Here we analyse the fly connectome to complete the list of cell types intrinsic to the optic lobe, as well as the rules governing their connectivity. Most new cell types contain 10 to 100 cells, and integrate information over medium distances in the visual field. Some existing type families (Tm, Li, and LPi)6-10 at least double in number of types. A new serpentine medulla (Sm) interneuron family contains more types than any other. Three families of cross-neuropil types are revealed. The consistency of types is demonstrated by analysing the distances in high-dimensional feature space, and is further validated by algorithms that select small subsets of discriminative features. We use connectivity to hypothesize about the functional roles of cell types in motion, object and colour vision. Connectivity with 'boundary types' that straddle the optic lobe and central brain is also quantified. We showcase the advantages of connectomic cell typing: complete and unbiased sampling, a rich array of features based on connectivity and reduction of the connectome to a substantially simpler wiring diagram of cell types, with immediate relevance for brain function and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Krzysztof Kruk
- Independent researcher, Kielce, Poland
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Doug Bland
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Austin T Burke
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Jay Gager
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - James Hebditch
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Ben Silverman
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Ryan Willie
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marissa Sorek
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emil Kind
- Institut für Biologie-Neurobiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dustin Garner
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Gizem Sancer
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mathias F Wernet
- Institut für Biologie-Neurobiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sung Soo Kim
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu N, Zhou B, Agrochao M, Clark DA. Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.08.598068. [PMID: 38915608 PMCID: PMC11195140 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.08.598068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Our intuition suggests that when a movie is played in reverse, our perception of motion in the reversed movie will be perfectly inverted compared to the original. This intuition is also reflected in many classical theoretical and practical models of motion detection. However, here we demonstrate that this symmetry of motion perception upon time reversal is often broken in real visual systems. In this work, we designed a set of visual stimuli to investigate how stimulus symmetries affect time reversal symmetry breaking in the fruit fly Drosophila's well-studied optomotor rotation behavior. We discovered a suite of new stimuli with a wide variety of different properties that can lead to broken time reversal symmetries in fly behavioral responses. We then trained neural network models to predict the velocity of scenes with both natural and artificial contrast distributions. Training with naturalistic contrast distributions yielded models that break time reversal symmetry, even when the training data was time reversal symmetric. We show analytically and numerically that the breaking of time reversal symmetry in the model responses can arise from contrast asymmetry in the training data, but can also arise from other features of the contrast distribution. Furthermore, shallower neural network models can exhibit stronger symmetry breaking than deeper ones, suggesting that less flexible neural networks promote some forms of time reversal symmetry breaking. Overall, these results reveal a surprising feature of biological motion detectors and suggest that it could arise from constrained optimization in natural environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Wu
- Yale College, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Baohua Zhou
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Margarida Agrochao
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Damon A. Clark
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Quantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nern A, Loesche F, Takemura SY, Burnett LE, Dreher M, Gruntman E, Hoeller J, Huang GB, Januszewski M, Klapoetke NC, Koskela S, Longden KD, Lu Z, Preibisch S, Qiu W, Rogers EM, Seenivasan P, Zhao A, Bogovic J, Canino BS, Clements J, Cook M, Finley-May S, Flynn MA, Hameed I, Fragniere AM, Hayworth KJ, Hopkins GP, Hubbard PM, Katz WT, Kovalyak J, Lauchie SA, Leonard M, Lohff A, Maldonado CA, Mooney C, Okeoma N, Olbris DJ, Ordish C, Paterson T, Phillips EM, Pietzsch T, Salinas JR, Rivlin PK, Schlegel P, Scott AL, Scuderi LA, Takemura S, Talebi I, Thomson A, Trautman ET, Umayam L, Walsh C, Walsh JJ, Xu CS, Yakal EA, Yang T, Zhao T, Funke J, George R, Hess HF, Jefferis GS, Knecht C, Korff W, Plaza SM, Romani S, Saalfeld S, Scheffer LK, Berg S, Rubin GM, Reiser MB. Connectome-driven neural inventory of a complete visual system. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.16.589741. [PMID: 38659887 PMCID: PMC11042306 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.16.589741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Vision provides animals with detailed information about their surroundings, conveying diverse features such as color, form, and movement across the visual scene. Computing these parallel spatial features requires a large and diverse network of neurons, such that in animals as distant as flies and humans, visual regions comprise half the brain's volume. These visual brain regions often reveal remarkable structure-function relationships, with neurons organized along spatial maps with shapes that directly relate to their roles in visual processing. To unravel the stunning diversity of a complex visual system, a careful mapping of the neural architecture matched to tools for targeted exploration of that circuitry is essential. Here, we report a new connectome of the right optic lobe from a male Drosophila central nervous system FIB-SEM volume and a comprehensive inventory of the fly's visual neurons. We developed a computational framework to quantify the anatomy of visual neurons, establishing a basis for interpreting how their shapes relate to spatial vision. By integrating this analysis with connectivity information, neurotransmitter identity, and expert curation, we classified the ~53,000 neurons into 727 types, about half of which are systematically described and named for the first time. Finally, we share an extensive collection of split-GAL4 lines matched to our neuron type catalog. Together, this comprehensive set of tools and data unlock new possibilities for systematic investigations of vision in Drosophila, a foundation for a deeper understanding of sensory processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aljoscha Nern
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Frank Loesche
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Shin-Ya Takemura
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Laura E Burnett
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Marisa Dreher
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Judith Hoeller
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Gary B Huang
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Nathan C Klapoetke
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Sanna Koskela
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Kit D Longden
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Zhiyuan Lu
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephan Preibisch
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Wei Qiu
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Edward M Rogers
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Pavithraa Seenivasan
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Arthur Zhao
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - John Bogovic
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Brandon S Canino
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Jody Clements
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael Cook
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Samantha Finley-May
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Miriam A Flynn
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Imran Hameed
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexandra Mc Fragniere
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Kenneth J Hayworth
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Gary Patrick Hopkins
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip M Hubbard
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - William T Katz
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Julie Kovalyak
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Shirley A Lauchie
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Meghan Leonard
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Alanna Lohff
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Charli A Maldonado
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Caroline Mooney
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Nneoma Okeoma
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Donald J Olbris
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher Ordish
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Tyler Paterson
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily M Phillips
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Tobias Pietzsch
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Jennifer Rivas Salinas
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Patricia K Rivlin
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Ashley L Scott
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Louis A Scuderi
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Satoko Takemura
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Iris Talebi
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander Thomson
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Eric T Trautman
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Lowell Umayam
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Claire Walsh
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - John J Walsh
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - C Shan Xu
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily A Yakal
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Tansy Yang
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Ting Zhao
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Jan Funke
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Reed George
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Harald F Hess
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Gregory Sxe Jefferis
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher Knecht
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Wyatt Korff
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephen M Plaza
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Sandro Romani
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephan Saalfeld
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Louis K Scheffer
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Stuart Berg
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Gerald M Rubin
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael B Reiser
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Google Research, Google LLC, Switzerland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pang MM, Chen F, Xie M, Druckmann S, Clandinin TR, Yang HH. A recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila deblurs visual inputs. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.19.590352. [PMID: 38712245 PMCID: PMC11071408 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.19.590352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
A critical goal of vision is to detect changes in light intensity, even when these changes are blurred by the spatial resolution of the eye and the motion of the animal. Here we describe a recurrent neural circuit in Drosophila that compensates for blur and thereby selectively enhances the perceived contrast of moving edges. Using in vivo, two-photon voltage imaging, we measured the temporal response properties of L1 and L2, two cell types that receive direct synaptic input from photoreceptors. These neurons have biphasic responses to brief flashes of light, a hallmark of cells that encode changes in stimulus intensity. However, the second phase was often much larger than the first, creating an unusual temporal filter. Genetic dissection revealed that recurrent neural circuitry strongly shapes the second phase of the response, informing the structure of a dynamical model. By applying this model to moving natural images, we demonstrate that rather than veridically representing stimulus changes, this temporal processing strategy systematically enhances them, amplifying and sharpening responses. Comparing the measured responses of L2 to model predictions across both artificial and natural stimuli revealed that L2 tunes its properties as the model predicts in order to deblur images. Since this strategy is tunable to behavioral context, generalizable to any time-varying sensory input, and implementable with a common circuit motif, we propose that it could be broadly used to selectively enhance sharp and salient changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M. Pang
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Marjorie Xie
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Current affiliation: School for the Future of Innovation of Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| | - Shaul Druckmann
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | | | - Helen H. Yang
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Current affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Lead contact
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Matsliah A, Yu SC, Kruk K, Bland D, Burke A, Gager J, Hebditch J, Silverman B, Willie K, Willie RW, Sorek M, Sterling AR, Kind E, Garner D, Sancer G, Wernet MF, Kim SS, Murthy M, Seung HS. Neuronal "parts list" and wiring diagram for a visual system. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.10.12.562119. [PMID: 37873160 PMCID: PMC10592826 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.12.562119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
A catalog of neuronal cell types has often been called a "parts list" of the brain, and regarded as a prerequisite for understanding brain function. In the optic lobe of Drosophila, rules of connectivity between cell types have already proven essential for understanding fly vision. Here we analyze the fly connectome to complete the list of cell types intrinsic to the optic lobe, as well as the rules governing their connectivity. We more than double the list of known types. Most new cell types contain between 10 and 100 cells, and integrate information over medium distances in the visual field. Some existing type families (Tm, Li, and LPi) at least double in number of types. We introduce a new Sm interneuron family, which contains more types than any other, and three new families of cross-neuropil types. Self-consistency of cell types is demonstrated through automatic assignment of cells to types by distance in high-dimensional feature space, and further validation is provided by algorithms that select small subsets of discriminative features. Cell types with similar connectivity patterns divide into clusters that are interpretable in terms of motion, object, and color vision. Our work showcases the advantages of connectomic cell typing: complete and unbiased sampling, a rich array of features based on connectivity, and reduction of the connectome to a drastically simpler wiring diagram of cell types, with immediate relevance for brain function and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | | | - Doug Bland
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | - Austin Burke
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | - Jay Gager
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | | | | | - Kyle Willie
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | | | | | | | - Emil Kind
- Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Freie Universität B erlin, Germany
| | - Dustin Garner
- Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Univ. C alifornia Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Gizem Sancer
- Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Freie Universität B erlin, Germany
| | - Mathias F Wernet
- Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie, Freie Universität B erlin, Germany
| | - Sung Soo Kim
- Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Univ. C alifornia Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, U SA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanfilippo P, Kim AJ, Bhukel A, Yoo J, Mirshahidi PS, Pandey V, Bevir H, Yuen A, Mirshahidi PS, Guo P, Li HS, Wohlschlegel JA, Aso Y, Zipursky SL. Mapping of multiple neurotransmitter receptor subtypes and distinct protein complexes to the connectome. Neuron 2024; 112:942-958.e13. [PMID: 38262414 PMCID: PMC10957333 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Neurons express various combinations of neurotransmitter receptor (NR) subunits and receive inputs from multiple neuron types expressing different neurotransmitters. Localizing NR subunits to specific synaptic inputs has been challenging. Here, we use epitope-tagged endogenous NR subunits, expansion light-sheet microscopy, and electron microscopy (EM) connectomics to molecularly characterize synapses in Drosophila. We show that in directionally selective motion-sensitive neurons, different multiple NRs elaborated a highly stereotyped molecular topography with NR localized to specific domains receiving cell-type-specific inputs. Developmental studies suggested that NRs or complexes of them with other membrane proteins determine patterns of synaptic inputs. In support of this model, we identify a transmembrane protein selectively associated with a subset of spatially restricted synapses and demonstrate its requirement for synapse formation through genetic analysis. We propose that mechanisms that regulate the precise spatial distribution of NRs provide a molecular cartography specifying the patterns of synaptic connections onto dendrites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Sanfilippo
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Alexander J Kim
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Anuradha Bhukel
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - Juyoun Yoo
- Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Pegah S Mirshahidi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Vijaya Pandey
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Harry Bevir
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Ashley Yuen
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Parmis S Mirshahidi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Peiyi Guo
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | - Hong-Sheng Li
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | - James A Wohlschlegel
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Yoshinori Aso
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - S Lawrence Zipursky
- Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The Drosophila visual system has been a great model to study fundamental questions in neurobiology, such as neural fate specification, axon guidance, circuit formation, and information processing. The Drosophila visual system is composed of the compound eye and the optic lobe. The optic lobe is divided into four neuropils-namely, the lamina, medulla, lobula, and lobula plate. There are around 200 types of optic lobe neurons, which wire together to form a complex neural structure to processes visual information. These neurons are derived from two neuroepithelial structures-namely, the outer proliferation center (OPC) and the inner proliferation center (IPC), in the larval brain. Recent work on the Drosophila optic lobe has revealed basic principles underlying the development of this complex neural structure, and immunostaining has been a key tool in these studies. Here, we provide a brief overview of the Drosophila optic lobe structure and development, as revealed by immunostaining. First, we introduce the structure of the adult optic lobe. Then, we summarize recent advances in the study of neural fate specification during development of different parts of the optic lobe. Last, we briefly summarize general aspects of axon guidance and neuropil assembly in the optic lobe. With this review, we aim to familiarize readers with this complex neural structure and highlight the power of this great model to study neural development to facilitate further developmental and functional studies using this system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lin A, Yang R, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Schlegel P, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Costa M, Eichler K, Bates AS, Eckstein N, Funke J, Jefferis GSXE, Murthy M. Network Statistics of the Whole-Brain Connectome of Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.07.29.551086. [PMID: 37547019 PMCID: PMC10402125 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.29.551086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Brains comprise complex networks of neurons and connections. Network analysis applied to the wiring diagrams of brains can offer insights into how brains support computations and regulate information flow. The completion of the first whole-brain connectome of an adult Drosophila, the largest connectome to date, containing 130,000 neurons and millions of connections, offers an unprecedented opportunity to analyze its network properties and topological features. To gain insights into local connectivity, we computed the prevalence of two- and three-node network motifs, examined their strengths and neurotransmitter compositions, and compared these topological metrics with wiring diagrams of other animals. We discovered that the network of the fly brain displays rich club organization, with a large population (30% percent of the connectome) of highly connected neurons. We identified subsets of rich club neurons that may serve as integrators or broadcasters of signals. Finally, we examined subnetworks based on 78 anatomically defined brain regions or neuropils. These data products are shared within the FlyWire Codex and will serve as a foundation for models and experiments exploring the relationship between neural activity and anatomical structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Lin
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Center for the Physics of Biological Function, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Runzhe Yang
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nils Eckstein
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Jan Funke
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cornean J, Molina-Obando S, Gür B, Bast A, Ramos-Traslosheros G, Chojetzki J, Lörsch L, Ioannidou M, Taneja R, Schnaitmann C, Silies M. Heterogeneity of synaptic connectivity in the fly visual system. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1570. [PMID: 38383614 PMCID: PMC10882054 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45971-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Visual systems are homogeneous structures, where repeating columnar units retinotopically cover the visual field. Each of these columns contain many of the same neuron types that are distinguished by anatomic, genetic and - generally - by functional properties. However, there are exceptions to this rule. In the 800 columns of the Drosophila eye, there is an anatomically and genetically identifiable cell type with variable functional properties, Tm9. Since anatomical connectivity shapes functional neuronal properties, we identified the presynaptic inputs of several hundred Tm9s across both optic lobes using the full adult female fly brain (FAFB) electron microscopic dataset and FlyWire connectome. Our work shows that Tm9 has three major and many sparsely distributed inputs. This differs from the presynaptic connectivity of other Tm neurons, which have only one major, and more stereotypic inputs than Tm9. Genetic synapse labeling showed that the heterogeneous wiring exists across individuals. Together, our data argue that the visual system uses heterogeneous, distributed circuit properties to achieve robust visual processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Cornean
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Molina-Obando
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Burak Gür
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annika Bast
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Giordano Ramos-Traslosheros
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jonas Chojetzki
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lena Lörsch
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Ioannidou
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rachita Taneja
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christopher Schnaitmann
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marion Silies
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes-Gutenberg University, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Borst A. Connectivity Matrix Seriation via Relaxation. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20:e1011904. [PMID: 38377134 PMCID: PMC10906871 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Volume electron microscopy together with computer-based image analysis are yielding neural circuit diagrams of ever larger regions of the brain. These datasets are usually represented in a cell-to-cell connectivity matrix and contain important information about prevalent circuit motifs allowing to directly test various theories on the computation in that brain structure. Of particular interest are the detection of cell assemblies and the quantification of feedback, which can profoundly change circuit properties. While the ordering of cells along the rows and columns doesn't change the connectivity, it can make special connectivity patterns recognizable. For example, ordering the cells along the flow of information, feedback and feedforward connections are segregated above and below the main matrix diagonal, respectively. Different algorithms are used to renumber matrices such as to minimize a given cost function, but either their performance becomes unsatisfying at a given size of the circuit or the CPU time needed to compute them scales in an unfavorable way with increasing number of neurons. Based on previous ideas, I describe an algorithm which is effective in matrix reordering with respect to both its performance as well as to its scaling in computing time. Rather than trying to reorder the matrix in discrete steps, the algorithm transiently relaxes the integer program by assigning a real-valued parameter to each cell describing its location on a continuous axis ('smooth-index') and finds the parameter set that minimizes the cost. I find that the smooth-index algorithm outperforms all algorithms I compared it to, including those based on topological sorting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Borst
- Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pérez-Schuster V, Salomón L, Bengochea M, Basnak MA, Velázquez Duarte F, Hermitte G, Berón de Astrada M. Threatening stimuli elicit a sequential cardiac pattern in arthropods. iScience 2024; 27:108672. [PMID: 38261947 PMCID: PMC10797191 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
In order to cope with the challenges of living in dynamic environments, animals rapidly adjust their behaviors in coordination with different physiological responses. Here, we studied whether threatening visual stimuli evoke different heart rate patterns in arthropods and whether these patterns are related with defensive behaviors. We identified two sequential phases of crab's cardiac response that occur with a similar timescale to that of the motor arrest and later escape response. The first phase was modulated by low salience stimuli and persisted throughout spaced stimulus presentation. The second phase was modulated by high-contrast stimuli and reduced by repetitive stimulus presentation. The overall correspondence between cardiac and motor responses suggests that the first cardiac response phase might be related to motor arrest while the second to the escape response. We show that in the face of threat arthropods coordinate their behavior and cardiac activity in a rapid and flexible manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verónica Pérez-Schuster
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires C1425FQB, Argentina
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Física, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lucca Salomón
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mercedes Bengochea
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Melanie Ailín Basnak
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Velázquez Duarte
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriela Hermitte
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martín Berón de Astrada
- Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología y Biología Molecular y Celular, Instituto de Biociencias, Biotecnología y Biología Traslacional (iB3), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Godoy Cruz 2290, Buenos Aires C1425FQB, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Longden KD, Rogers EM, Nern A, Dionne H, Reiser MB. Different spectral sensitivities of ON- and OFF-motion pathways enhance the detection of approaching color objects in Drosophila. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7693. [PMID: 38001097 PMCID: PMC10673857 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43566-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Color and motion are used by many species to identify salient objects. They are processed largely independently, but color contributes to motion processing in humans, for example, enabling moving colored objects to be detected when their luminance matches the background. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected, additional contribution of color to motion vision in Drosophila. We show that behavioral ON-motion responses are more sensitive to UV than for OFF-motion, and we identify cellular pathways connecting UV-sensitive R7 photoreceptors to ON and OFF-motion-sensitive T4 and T5 cells, using neurogenetics and calcium imaging. Remarkably, this contribution of color circuitry to motion vision enhances the detection of approaching UV discs, but not green discs with the same chromatic contrast, and we show how this could generalize for systems with ON- and OFF-motion pathways. Our results provide a computational and circuit basis for how color enhances motion vision to favor the detection of saliently colored objects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit D Longden
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA.
| | - Edward M Rogers
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA
| | - Heather Dionne
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA
| | - Michael B Reiser
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA, 20147, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tanaka R, Zhou B, Agrochao M, Badwan BA, Au B, Matos NCB, Clark DA. Neural mechanisms to incorporate visual counterevidence in self-movement estimation. Curr Biol 2023; 33:4960-4979.e7. [PMID: 37918398 PMCID: PMC10848174 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
In selecting appropriate behaviors, animals should weigh sensory evidence both for and against specific beliefs about the world. For instance, animals measure optic flow to estimate and control their own rotation. However, existing models of flow detection can be spuriously triggered by visual motion created by objects moving in the world. Here, we show that stationary patterns on the retina, which constitute evidence against observer rotation, suppress inappropriate stabilizing rotational behavior in the fruit fly Drosophila. In silico experiments show that artificial neural networks (ANNs) that are optimized to distinguish observer movement from external object motion similarly detect stationarity and incorporate negative evidence. Employing neural measurements and genetic manipulations, we identified components of the circuitry for stationary pattern detection, which runs parallel to the fly's local motion and optic-flow detectors. Our results show how the fly brain incorporates negative evidence to improve heading stability, exemplifying how a compact brain exploits geometrical constraints of the visual world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Tanaka
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Baohua Zhou
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Margarida Agrochao
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Bara A Badwan
- School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Braedyn Au
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Natalia C B Matos
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Damon A Clark
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Quantitative Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ammer G, Serbe-Kamp E, Mauss AS, Richter FG, Fendl S, Borst A. Multilevel visual motion opponency in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 2023; 26:1894-1905. [PMID: 37783895 PMCID: PMC10620086 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-023-01443-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Inhibitory interactions between opponent neuronal pathways constitute a common circuit motif across brain areas and species. However, in most cases, synaptic wiring and biophysical, cellular and network mechanisms generating opponency are unknown. Here, we combine optogenetics, voltage and calcium imaging, connectomics, electrophysiology and modeling to reveal multilevel opponent inhibition in the fly visual system. We uncover a circuit architecture in which a single cell type implements direction-selective, motion-opponent inhibition at all three network levels. This inhibition, mediated by GluClα receptors, is balanced with excitation in strength, despite tenfold fewer synapses. The different opponent network levels constitute a nested, hierarchical structure operating at increasing spatiotemporal scales. Electrophysiology and modeling suggest that distributing this computation over consecutive network levels counteracts a reduction in gain, which would result from integrating large opposing conductances at a single instance. We propose that this neural architecture provides resilience to noise while enabling high selectivity for relevant sensory information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Ammer
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany.
| | - Etienne Serbe-Kamp
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany
- Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alex S Mauss
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Florian G Richter
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sandra Fendl
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Alexander Borst
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen J, Gish CM, Fransen JW, Salazar-Gatzimas E, Clark DA, Borghuis BG. Direct comparison reveals algorithmic similarities in fly and mouse visual motion detection. iScience 2023; 26:107928. [PMID: 37810236 PMCID: PMC10550730 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Evolution has equipped vertebrates and invertebrates with neural circuits that selectively encode visual motion. While similarities in the computations performed by these circuits in mouse and fruit fly have been noted, direct experimental comparisons have been lacking. Because molecular mechanisms and neuronal morphology in the two species are distinct, we directly compared motion encoding in these two species at the algorithmic level, using matched stimuli and focusing on a pair of analogous neurons, the mouse ON starburst amacrine cell (ON SAC) and Drosophila T4 neurons. We find that the cells share similar spatiotemporal receptive field structures, sensitivity to spatiotemporal correlations, and tuning to sinusoidal drifting gratings, but differ in their responses to apparent motion stimuli. Both neuron types showed a response to summed sinusoids that deviates from models for motion processing in these cells, underscoring the similarities in their processing and identifying response features that remain to be explained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juyue Chen
- Interdepartmental Neurosciences Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Caitlin M Gish
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - James W Fransen
- Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | | | - Damon A Clark
- Interdepartmental Neurosciences Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Bart G Borghuis
- Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhao A, Nern A, Koskela S, Dreher M, Erginkaya M, Laughland CW, Ludwigh H, Thomson A, Hoeller J, Parekh R, Romani S, Bock DD, Chiappe E, Reiser MB. A comprehensive neuroanatomical survey of the Drosophila Lobula Plate Tangential Neurons with predictions for their optic flow sensitivity. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.16.562634. [PMID: 37904921 PMCID: PMC10614863 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.16.562634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Flying insects exhibit remarkable navigational abilities controlled by their compact nervous systems. Optic flow, the pattern of changes in the visual scene induced by locomotion, is a crucial sensory cue for robust self-motion estimation, especially during rapid flight. Neurons that respond to specific, large-field optic flow patterns have been studied for decades, primarily in large flies, such as houseflies, blowflies, and hover flies. The best-known optic-flow sensitive neurons are the large tangential cells of the dipteran lobula plate, whose visual-motion responses, and to a lesser extent, their morphology, have been explored using single-neuron neurophysiology. Most of these studies have focused on the large, Horizontal and Vertical System neurons, yet the lobula plate houses a much larger set of 'optic-flow' sensitive neurons, many of which have been challenging to unambiguously identify or to reliably target for functional studies. Here we report the comprehensive reconstruction and identification of the Lobula Plate Tangential Neurons in an Electron Microscopy (EM) volume of a whole Drosophila brain. This catalog of 58 LPT neurons (per brain hemisphere) contains many neurons that are described here for the first time and provides a basis for systematic investigation of the circuitry linking self-motion to locomotion control. Leveraging computational anatomy methods, we estimated the visual motion receptive fields of these neurons and compared their tuning to the visual consequence of body rotations and translational movements. We also matched these neurons, in most cases on a one-for-one basis, to stochastically labeled cells in genetic driver lines, to the mirror-symmetric neurons in the same EM brain volume, and to neurons in an additional EM data set. Using cell matches across data sets, we analyzed the integration of optic flow patterns by neurons downstream of the LPTs and find that most central brain neurons establish sharper selectivity for global optic flow patterns than their input neurons. Furthermore, we found that self-motion information extracted from optic flow is processed in distinct regions of the central brain, pointing to diverse foci for the generation of visual behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Zhao
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Sanna Koskela
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Marisa Dreher
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Mert Erginkaya
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Connor W Laughland
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Henrique Ludwigh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Alex Thomson
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Judith Hoeller
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Ruchi Parekh
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Sandro Romani
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| | - Davi D Bock
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, USA
| | - Eugenia Chiappe
- Champalimaud Neuroscience Programme, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michael B Reiser
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sanfilippo P, Kim AJ, Bhukel A, Yoo J, Mirshahidi PS, Pandey V, Bevir H, Yuen A, Mirshahidi PS, Guo P, Li HS, Wohlschlegel JA, Aso Y, Zipursky SL. Mapping of multiple neurotransmitter receptor subtypes and distinct protein complexes to the connectome. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.02.560011. [PMID: 37873314 PMCID: PMC10592863 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.02.560011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Neurons express different combinations of neurotransmitter receptor (NR) subunits and receive inputs from multiple neuron types expressing different neurotransmitters. Localizing NR subunits to specific synaptic inputs has been challenging. Here we use epitope tagged endogenous NR subunits, expansion light-sheet microscopy, and EM connectomics to molecularly characterize synapses in Drosophila. We show that in directionally selective motion sensitive neurons, different multiple NRs elaborated a highly stereotyped molecular topography with NR localized to specific domains receiving cell-type specific inputs. Developmental studies suggested that NRs or complexes of them with other membrane proteins determines patterns of synaptic inputs. In support of this model, we identify a transmembrane protein associated selectively with a subset of spatially restricted synapses and demonstrate through genetic analysis its requirement for synapse formation. We propose that mechanisms which regulate the precise spatial distribution of NRs provide a molecular cartography specifying the patterns of synaptic connections onto dendrites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Sanfilippo
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander J Kim
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anuradha Bhukel
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Juyoun Yoo
- Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pegah S Mirshahidi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vijaya Pandey
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harry Bevir
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ashley Yuen
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Parmis S Mirshahidi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peiyi Guo
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Hong-Sheng Li
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - James A Wohlschlegel
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yoshinori Aso
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - S Lawrence Zipursky
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Lead Contact
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mano O, Choi M, Tanaka R, Creamer MS, Matos NCB, Shomar JW, Badwan BA, Clandinin TR, Clark DA. Long-timescale anti-directional rotation in Drosophila optomotor behavior. eLife 2023; 12:e86076. [PMID: 37751469 PMCID: PMC10522332 DOI: 10.7554/elife.86076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Locomotor movements cause visual images to be displaced across the eye, a retinal slip that is counteracted by stabilizing reflexes in many animals. In insects, optomotor turning causes the animal to turn in the direction of rotating visual stimuli, thereby reducing retinal slip and stabilizing trajectories through the world. This behavior has formed the basis for extensive dissections of motion vision. Here, we report that under certain stimulus conditions, two Drosophila species, including the widely studied Drosophila melanogaster, can suppress and even reverse the optomotor turning response over several seconds. Such 'anti-directional turning' is most strongly evoked by long-lasting, high-contrast, slow-moving visual stimuli that are distinct from those that promote syn-directional optomotor turning. Anti-directional turning, like the syn-directional optomotor response, requires the local motion detecting neurons T4 and T5. A subset of lobula plate tangential cells, CH cells, show involvement in these responses. Imaging from a variety of direction-selective cells in the lobula plate shows no evidence of dynamics that match the behavior, suggesting that the observed inversion in turning direction emerges downstream of the lobula plate. Further, anti-directional turning declines with age and exposure to light. These results show that Drosophila optomotor turning behaviors contain rich, stimulus-dependent dynamics that are inconsistent with simple reflexive stabilization responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Mano
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Minseung Choi
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Ryosuke Tanaka
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Matthew S Creamer
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Natalia CB Matos
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Joseph W Shomar
- Department of Physics, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Bara A Badwan
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | | | - Damon A Clark
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
- Department of Physics, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yoo J, Dombrovski M, Mirshahidi P, Nern A, LoCascio SA, Zipursky SL, Kurmangaliyev YZ. Brain wiring determinants uncovered by integrating connectomes and transcriptomes. Curr Biol 2023; 33:3998-4005.e6. [PMID: 37647901 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Advances in brain connectomics have demonstrated the extraordinary complexity of neural circuits.1,2,3,4,5 Developing neurons encounter the axons and dendrites of many different neuron types and form synapses with only a subset of them. During circuit assembly, neurons express cell-type-specific repertoires comprising many cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) that can mediate interactions between developing neurites.6,7,8 Many CAM families have been shown to contribute to brain wiring in different ways.9,10 It has been challenging, however, to identify receptor-ligand pairs directly matching neurons with their synaptic targets. Here, we integrated the synapse-level connectome of the neural circuit11,12 with the developmental expression patterns7 and binding specificities of CAMs6,13 on pre- and postsynaptic neurons in the Drosophila visual system. To overcome the complexity of neural circuits, we focus on pairs of genetically related neurons that make differential wiring choices. In the motion detection circuit,14 closely related subtypes of T4/T5 neurons choose between alternative synaptic targets in adjacent layers of neuropil.12 This choice correlates with the matching expression in synaptic partners of different receptor-ligand pairs of the Beat and Side families of CAMs. Genetic analysis demonstrated that presynaptic Side-II and postsynaptic Beat-VI restrict synaptic partners to the same layer. Removal of this receptor-ligand pair disrupts layers and leads to inappropriate targeting of presynaptic sites and postsynaptic dendrites. We propose that different Side/Beat receptor-ligand pairs collaborate with other recognition molecules to determine wiring specificities in the fly brain. Combining transcriptomes, connectomes, and protein interactome maps allow unbiased identification of determinants of brain wiring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juyoun Yoo
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Mark Dombrovski
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Parmis Mirshahidi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - Samuel A LoCascio
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - S Lawrence Zipursky
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| | - Yerbol Z Kurmangaliyev
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Schlegel P, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Lin A, Costa M, Eichler K, Yin Y, Silversmith W, Schneider-Mizell C, Jordan CS, Brittain D, Halageri A, Kuehner K, Ogedengbe O, Morey R, Gager J, Kruk K, Perlman E, Yang R, Deutsch D, Bland D, Sorek M, Lu R, Macrina T, Lee K, Bae JA, Mu S, Nehoran B, Mitchell E, Popovych S, Wu J, Jia Z, Castro M, Kemnitz N, Ih D, Bates AS, Eckstein N, Funke J, Collman F, Bock DD, Jefferis GS, Seung HS, Murthy M. Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.06.27.546656. [PMID: 37425937 PMCID: PMC10327113 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.27.546656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Connections between neurons can be mapped by acquiring and analyzing electron microscopic (EM) brain images. In recent years, this approach has been applied to chunks of brains to reconstruct local connectivity maps that are highly informative, yet inadequate for understanding brain function more globally. Here, we present the first neuronal wiring diagram of a whole adult brain, containing 5×107 chemical synapses between ~130,000 neurons reconstructed from a female Drosophila melanogaster. The resource also incorporates annotations of cell classes and types, nerves, hemilineages, and predictions of neurotransmitter identities. Data products are available by download, programmatic access, and interactive browsing and made interoperable with other fly data resources. We show how to derive a projectome, a map of projections between regions, from the connectome. We demonstrate the tracing of synaptic pathways and the analysis of information flow from inputs (sensory and ascending neurons) to outputs (motor, endocrine, and descending neurons), across both hemispheres, and between the central brain and the optic lobes. Tracing from a subset of photoreceptors all the way to descending motor pathways illustrates how structure can uncover putative circuit mechanisms underlying sensorimotor behaviors. The technologies and open ecosystem of the FlyWire Consortium set the stage for future large-scale connectome projects in other species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, USA
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Szi-chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Albert Lin
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Center for the Physics of Biological Function, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yijie Yin
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Will Silversmith
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Chris S. Jordan
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Akhilesh Halageri
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Kai Kuehner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Ryan Morey
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Jay Gager
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | | | - Runzhe Yang
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - David Deutsch
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Doug Bland
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Marissa Sorek
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, USA
| | - Ran Lu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Thomas Macrina
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Kisuk Lee
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Brain & Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
| | - J. Alexander Bae
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Shang Mu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Barak Nehoran
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Eric Mitchell
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Sergiy Popovych
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Jingpeng Wu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Zhen Jia
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Manuel Castro
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Nico Kemnitz
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Dodam Ih
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nils Eckstein
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | - Jan Funke
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, USA
| | | | - Davi D. Bock
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA
| | - Gregory S.X.E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - H. Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
How neurons detect the direction of motion is a prime example of neural computation: Motion vision is found in the visual systems of virtually all sighted animals, it is important for survival, and it requires interesting computations with well-defined linear and nonlinear processing steps-yet the whole process is of moderate complexity. The genetic methods available in the fruit fly Drosophila and the charting of a connectome of its visual system have led to rapid progress and unprecedented detail in our understanding of how neurons compute the direction of motion in this organism. The picture that emerged incorporates not only the identity, morphology, and synaptic connectivity of each neuron involved but also its neurotransmitters, its receptors, and their subcellular localization. Together with the neurons' membrane potential responses to visual stimulation, this information provides the basis for a biophysically realistic model of the circuit that computes the direction of visual motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Borst
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany; ,
| | - Lukas N Groschner
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany; ,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pirogova N, Borst A. Contrast normalization affects response time-course of visual interneurons. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285686. [PMID: 37294743 PMCID: PMC10256145 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
In natural environments, light intensities and visual contrasts vary widely, yet neurons have a limited response range for encoding them. Neurons accomplish that by flexibly adjusting their dynamic range to the statistics of the environment via contrast normalization. The effect of contrast normalization is usually measured as a reduction of neural signal amplitudes, but whether it influences response dynamics is unknown. Here, we show that contrast normalization in visual interneurons of Drosophila melanogaster not only suppresses the amplitude but also alters the dynamics of responses when a dynamic surround is present. We present a simple model that qualitatively reproduces the simultaneous effect of the visual surround on the response amplitude and temporal dynamics by altering the cells' input resistance and, thus, their membrane time constant. In conclusion, single-cell filtering properties as derived from artificial stimulus protocols like white-noise stimulation cannot be transferred one-to-one to predict responses under natural conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadezhda Pirogova
- Department Circuits-Computation-Models, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Planegg, Martinsried, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, LMU Munich, Planegg, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Alexander Borst
- Department Circuits-Computation-Models, Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Planegg, Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Temporal control of neuronal wiring. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2023; 142:81-90. [PMID: 35644877 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Wiring an animal brain is a complex process involving a staggering number of cell-types born at different times and locations in the developing brain. Incorporation of these cells into precise circuits with high fidelity is critical for animal survival and behavior. Assembly of neuronal circuits is heavily dependent upon proper timing of wiring programs, requiring neurons to express specific sets of genes (sometimes transiently) at the right time in development. While cell-type specificity of genetic programs regulating wiring has been studied in detail, mechanisms regulating proper timing and coordination of these programs across cell-types are only just beginning to emerge. In this review, we discuss some temporal regulators of wiring programs and how their activity is controlled over time and space. A common feature emerges from these temporal regulators - they are induced by cell-extrinsic cues and control transcription factors capable of regulating a highly cell-type specific set of target genes. Target specificity in these contexts comes from cell-type specific transcription factors. We propose that the spatiotemporal specificity of wiring programs is controlled by the combinatorial activity of temporal programs and cell-type specific transcription factors. Going forward, a better understanding of temporal regulators will be key to understanding the mechanisms underlying brain wiring, and will be critical for the development of in vitro models like brain organoids.
Collapse
|
29
|
Currier TA, Pang MM, Clandinin TR. Visual processing in the fly, from photoreceptors to behavior. Genetics 2023; 224:iyad064. [PMID: 37128740 PMCID: PMC10213501 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Originally a genetic model organism, the experimental use of Drosophila melanogaster has grown to include quantitative behavioral analyses, sophisticated perturbations of neuronal function, and detailed sensory physiology. A highlight of these developments can be seen in the context of vision, where pioneering studies have uncovered fundamental and generalizable principles of sensory processing. Here we begin with an overview of vision-guided behaviors and common methods for probing visual circuits. We then outline the anatomy and physiology of brain regions involved in visual processing, beginning at the sensory periphery and ending with descending motor control. Areas of focus include contrast and motion detection in the optic lobe, circuits for visual feature selectivity, computations in support of spatial navigation, and contextual associative learning. Finally, we look to the future of fly visual neuroscience and discuss promising topics for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Currier
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Michelle M Pang
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Thomas R Clandinin
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Braun A, Borst A, Meier M. Disynaptic inhibition shapes tuning of OFF-motion detectors in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2023:S0960-9822(23)00601-2. [PMID: 37236181 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The circuitry underlying the detection of visual motion in Drosophila melanogaster is one of the best studied networks in neuroscience. Lately, electron microscopy reconstructions, algorithmic models, and functional studies have proposed a common motif for the cellular circuitry of an elementary motion detector based on both supralinear enhancement for preferred direction and sublinear suppression for null-direction motion. In T5 cells, however, all columnar input neurons (Tm1, Tm2, Tm4, and Tm9) are excitatory. So, how is null-direction suppression realized there? Using two-photon calcium imaging in combination with thermogenetics, optogenetics, apoptotics, and pharmacology, we discovered that it is via CT1, the GABAergic large-field amacrine cell, where the different processes have previously been shown to act in an electrically isolated way. Within each column, CT1 receives excitatory input from Tm9 and Tm1 and provides the sign-inverted, now inhibitory input signal onto T5. Ablating CT1 or knocking down GABA-receptor subunit Rdl significantly broadened the directional tuning of T5 cells. It thus appears that the signal of Tm1 and Tm9 is used both as an excitatory input for preferred direction enhancement and, through a sign inversion within the Tm1/Tm9-CT1 microcircuit, as an inhibitory input for null-direction suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalia Braun
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Department of Circuits - Computation - Models, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
| | - Alexander Borst
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Department of Circuits - Computation - Models, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Matthias Meier
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Department of Circuits - Computation - Models, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Borst A, Leibold C. Connecting Connectomes to Physiology. J Neurosci 2023; 43:3599-3610. [PMID: 37197984 PMCID: PMC10198452 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2208-22.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
With the advent of volumetric EM techniques, large connectomic datasets are being created, providing neuroscience researchers with knowledge about the full connectivity of neural circuits under study. This allows for numerical simulation of detailed, biophysical models of each neuron participating in the circuit. However, these models typically include a large number of parameters, and insight into which of these are essential for circuit function is not readily obtained. Here, we review two mathematical strategies for gaining insight into connectomics data: linear dynamical systems analysis and matrix reordering techniques. Such analytical treatment can allow us to make predictions about time constants of information processing and functional subunits in large networks.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This viewpoint provides a concise overview on how to extract important insights from Connectomics data by mathematical methods. First, it explains how new dynamics and new time constants can evolve, simply through connectivity between neurons. These new time-constants can be far longer than the intrinsic membrane time-constants of the individual neurons. Second, it summarizes how structural motifs in the circuit can be discovered. Specifically, there are tools to decide whether or not a circuit is strictly feed-forward or whether feed-back connections exist. Only by reordering connectivity matrices can such motifs be made visible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Borst
- Max-Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Department Circuits-Computation-Models, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Christian Leibold
- Fakultät für Biologie & Bernstein Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhao Y, Ke S, Cheng G, Lv X, Chang J, Zhou W. Direction Selectivity of TmY Neurites in Drosophila. Neurosci Bull 2023; 39:759-773. [PMID: 36399278 PMCID: PMC10169962 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-022-00966-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The perception of motion is an important function of vision. Neural wiring diagrams for extracting directional information have been obtained by connectome reconstruction. Direction selectivity in Drosophila is thought to originate in T4/T5 neurons through integrating inputs with different temporal filtering properties. Through genetic screening based on synaptic distribution, we isolated a new type of TmY neuron, termed TmY-ds, that form reciprocal synaptic connections with T4/T5 neurons. Its neurites responded to grating motion along the four cardinal directions and showed a variety of direction selectivity. Intriguingly, its direction selectivity originated from temporal filtering neurons rather than T4/T5. Genetic silencing and activation experiments showed that TmY-ds neurons are functionally upstream of T4/T5. Our results suggest that direction selectivity is generated in a tripartite circuit formed among these three neurons-temporal filtering, TmY-ds, and T4/T5 neurons, in which TmY-ds plays a role in the enhancement of direction selectivity in T4/T5 neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinyin Zhao
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China
| | - Shanshan Ke
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China
| | - Guo Cheng
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China
| | - Xiaohua Lv
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China
| | - Jin Chang
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
| | - Wei Zhou
- Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wu Z, Guo A. Bioinspired figure-ground discrimination via visual motion smoothing. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011077. [PMID: 37083880 PMCID: PMC10155969 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Flies detect and track moving targets among visual clutter, and this process mainly relies on visual motion. Visual motion is analyzed or computed with the pathway from the retina to T4/T5 cells. The computation of local directional motion was formulated as an elementary movement detector (EMD) model more than half a century ago. Solving target detection or figure-ground discrimination problems can be equivalent to extracting boundaries between a target and the background based on the motion discontinuities in the output of a retinotopic array of EMDs. Individual EMDs cannot measure true velocities, however, due to their sensitivity to pattern properties such as luminance contrast and spatial frequency content. It remains unclear how local directional motion signals are further integrated to enable figure-ground discrimination. Here, we present a computational model inspired by fly motion vision. Simulations suggest that the heavily fluctuating output of an EMD array is naturally surmounted by a lobula network, which is hypothesized to be downstream of the local motion detectors and have parallel pathways with distinct directional selectivity. The lobula network carries out a spatiotemporal smoothing operation for visual motion, especially across time, enabling the segmentation of moving figures from the background. The model qualitatively reproduces experimental observations in the visually evoked response characteristics of one type of lobula columnar (LC) cell. The model is further shown to be robust to natural scene variability. Our results suggest that the lobula is involved in local motion-based target detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihua Wu
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Aike Guo
- School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- International Academic Center of Complex Systems, Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mano O, Choi M, Tanaka R, Creamer MS, Matos NC, Shomar J, Badwan BA, Clandinin TR, Clark DA. Long timescale anti-directional rotation in Drosophila optomotor behavior. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.06.523055. [PMID: 36711627 PMCID: PMC9882005 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.06.523055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Locomotor movements cause visual images to be displaced across the eye, a retinal slip that is counteracted by stabilizing reflexes in many animals. In insects, optomotor turning causes the animal to turn in the direction of rotating visual stimuli, thereby reducing retinal slip and stabilizing trajectories through the world. This behavior has formed the basis for extensive dissections of motion vision. Here, we report that under certain stimulus conditions, two Drosophila species, including the widely studied D. melanogaster, can suppress and even reverse the optomotor turning response over several seconds. Such "anti-directional turning" is most strongly evoked by long-lasting, high-contrast, slow-moving visual stimuli that are distinct from those that promote syn-directional optomotor turning. Anti-directional turning, like the syn-directional optomotor response, requires the local motion detecting neurons T4 and T5. A subset of lobula plate tangential cells, CH cells, show involvement in these responses. Imaging from a variety of direction-selective cells in the lobula plate shows no evidence of dynamics that match the behavior, suggesting that the observed inversion in turning direction emerges downstream of the lobula plate. Further, anti-directional turning declines with age and exposure to light. These results show that Drosophila optomotor turning behaviors contain rich, stimulus-dependent dynamics that are inconsistent with simple reflexive stabilization responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Mano
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Minseung Choi
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Ryosuke Tanaka
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Matthew S. Creamer
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Natalia C.B. Matos
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Joseph Shomar
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Bara A. Badwan
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | | | - Damon A. Clark
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mishra A, Serbe-Kamp E, Borst A, Haag J. Voltage to Calcium Transformation Enhances Direction Selectivity in Drosophila T4 Neurons. J Neurosci 2023; 43:2497-2514. [PMID: 36849417 PMCID: PMC10082464 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2297-22.2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
An important step in neural information processing is the transformation of membrane voltage into calcium signals leading to transmitter release. However, the effect of voltage to calcium transformation on neural responses to different sensory stimuli is not well understood. Here, we use in vivo two-photon imaging of genetically encoded voltage and calcium indicators, ArcLight and GCaMP6f, respectively, to measure responses in direction-selective T4 neurons of female Drosophila Comparison between ArcLight and GCaMP6f signals reveals calcium signals to have a significantly higher direction selectivity compared with voltage signals. Using these recordings, we build a model which transforms T4 voltage responses into calcium responses. Using a cascade of thresholding, temporal filtering and a stationary nonlinearity, the model reproduces experimentally measured calcium responses across different visual stimuli. These findings provide a mechanistic underpinning of the voltage to calcium transformation and show how this processing step, in addition to synaptic mechanisms on the dendrites of T4 cells, enhances direction selectivity in the output signal of T4 neurons. Measuring the directional tuning of postsynaptic vertical system (VS)-cells with inputs from other cells blocked, we found that, indeed, it matches the one of the calcium signal in presynaptic T4 cells.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The transformation of voltage to calcium influx is an important step in the signaling cascade within a nerve cell. While this process has been intensely studied in the context of transmitter release mechanism, its consequences for information transmission and neural computation are unclear. Here, we measured both membrane voltage and cytosolic calcium levels in direction-selective cells of Drosophila in response to a large set of visual stimuli. We found direction selectivity in the calcium signal to be significantly enhanced compared with membrane voltage through a nonlinear transformation of voltage to calcium. Our findings highlight the importance of an additional step in the signaling cascade for information processing within single nerve cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Mishra
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Etienne Serbe-Kamp
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Alexander Borst
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Juergen Haag
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lu Z, Xu CS, Hayworth KJ, Pang S, Shinomiya K, Plaza SM, Scheffer LK, Rubin GM, Hess HF, Rivlin PK, Meinertzhagen IA. En bloc preparation of Drosophila brains enables high-throughput FIB-SEM connectomics. Front Neural Circuits 2022; 16:917251. [PMID: 36589862 PMCID: PMC9801301 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.917251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Deriving the detailed synaptic connections of an entire nervous system is the unrealized goal of the nascent field of connectomics. For the fruit fly Drosophila, in particular, we need to dissect the brain, connectives, and ventral nerve cord as a single continuous unit, fix and stain it, and undertake automated segmentation of neuron membranes. To achieve this, we designed a protocol using progressive lowering of temperature dehydration (PLT), a technique routinely used to preserve cellular structure and antigenicity. We combined PLT with low temperature en bloc staining (LTS) and recover fixed neurons as round profiles with darkly stained synapses, suitable for machine segmentation and automatic synapse detection. Here we report three different PLT-LTS methods designed to meet the requirements for FIB-SEM imaging of the Drosophila brain. These requirements include: good preservation of ultrastructural detail, high level of en bloc staining, artifact-free microdissection, and smooth hot-knife cutting to reduce the brain to dimensions suited to FIB-SEM. In addition to PLT-LTS, we designed a jig to microdissect and pre-fix the fly's delicate brain and central nervous system. Collectively these methods optimize morphological preservation, allow us to image the brain usually at 8 nm per voxel, and simultaneously speed the formerly slow rate of FIB-SEM imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Lu
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - C. Shan Xu
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kenneth J. Hayworth
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Song Pang
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Stephen M. Plaza
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Louis K. Scheffer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Gerald M. Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Harald F. Hess
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States
| | - Patricia K. Rivlin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD, United States,*Correspondence: Patricia K. Rivlin,
| | - Ian A. Meinertzhagen
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada,Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, United States,*Correspondence: Patricia K. Rivlin,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
How axon and dendrite branching are guided by time, energy, and spatial constraints. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20810. [PMID: 36460669 PMCID: PMC9718790 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24813-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurons are connected by complex branching processes-axons and dendrites-that process information for organisms to respond to their environment. Classifying neurons according to differences in structure or function is a fundamental part of neuroscience. Here, by constructing biophysical theory and testing against empirical measures of branching structure, we develop a general model that establishes a correspondence between neuron structure and function as mediated by principles such as time or power minimization for information processing as well as spatial constraints for forming connections. We test our predictions for radius scale factors against those extracted from neuronal images, measured for species that range from insects to whales, including data from light and electron microscopy studies. Notably, our findings reveal that the branching of axons and peripheral nervous system neurons is mainly determined by time minimization, while dendritic branching is determined by power minimization. Our model also predicts a quarter-power scaling relationship between conduction time delay and body size.
Collapse
|
38
|
Gonzalez-Suarez AD, Zavatone-Veth JA, Chen J, Matulis CA, Badwan BA, Clark DA. Excitatory and inhibitory neural dynamics jointly tune motion detection. Curr Biol 2022; 32:3659-3675.e8. [PMID: 35868321 PMCID: PMC9474608 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Neurons integrate excitatory and inhibitory signals to produce their outputs, but the role of input timing in this integration remains poorly understood. Motion detection is a paradigmatic example of this integration, since theories of motion detection rely on different delays in visual signals. These delays allow circuits to compare scenes at different times to calculate the direction and speed of motion. Different motion detection circuits have different velocity sensitivity, but it remains untested how the response dynamics of individual cell types drive this tuning. Here, we sped up or slowed down specific neuron types in Drosophila's motion detection circuit by manipulating ion channel expression. Altering the dynamics of individual neuron types upstream of motion detectors increased their sensitivity to fast or slow visual motion, exposing distinct roles for excitatory and inhibitory dynamics in tuning directional signals, including a role for the amacrine cell CT1. A circuit model constrained by functional data and anatomy qualitatively reproduced the observed tuning changes. Overall, these results reveal how excitatory and inhibitory dynamics together tune a canonical circuit computation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob A Zavatone-Veth
- Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Juyue Chen
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | | | - Bara A Badwan
- School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Damon A Clark
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barnatan Y, Tomsic D, Cámera A, Sztarker J. Matched function of the neuropil processing optic flow in flies and crabs: the lobula plate mediates optomotor responses in Neohelice granulata. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20220812. [PMID: 35975436 PMCID: PMC9382210 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
When an animal rotates (whether it is an arthropod, a fish, a bird or a human) a drift of the visual panorama occurs over its retina, termed optic flow. The image is stabilized by compensatory behaviours (driven by the movement of the eyes, head or the whole body depending on the animal) collectively termed optomotor responses. The dipteran lobula plate has been consistently linked with optic flow processing and the control of optomotor responses. Crabs have a neuropil similarly located and interconnected in the optic lobes, therefore referred to as a lobula plate too. Here we show that the crabs' lobula plate is required for normal optomotor responses since the response was lost or severely impaired in animals whose lobula plate had been lesioned. The effect was behaviour-specific, since avoidance responses to approaching visual stimuli were not affected. Crabs require simpler optic flow processing than flies (because they move slower and in two-dimensional instead of three-dimensional space), consequently their lobula plates are relatively smaller. Nonetheless, they perform the same essential role in the visual control of behaviour. Our findings add a fundamental piece to the current debate on the evolutionary relationship between the lobula plates of insects and crustaceans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Barnatan
- Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE) CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel Tomsic
- Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE) CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular Dr. Héctor Maldonado, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandro Cámera
- Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE) CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Julieta Sztarker
- Instituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE) CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Celular Dr. Héctor Maldonado, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Pabellón II, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Motion vision: Drosophila neural pathways that go with the visual flow. Curr Biol 2022; 32:R881-R883. [PMID: 35998597 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Processing visual motion cues to interpret self-motion, the movement of others, and the environment's structure is vital to all animals, whether prey or predator. A new study in Drosophila identifies multiple pathways likely contributing to visual motion-dependent computations and behaviors.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hayashi M, Kazawa T, Tsunoda H, Kanzaki R. The Understanding of ON-Edge Motion Detection Through the Simulation Based on the Connectome of Drosophila’s Optic Lobe. JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS AND MECHATRONICS 2022. [DOI: 10.20965/jrm.2022.p0795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The optic lobe of the fly is one of the prominent model systems for the neural mechanism of the motion detection. How a fly who lives under various visual situations of the nature processes the information from at most a few thousands of ommatidia in their neural circuit for the detection of moving objects is not exactly clear though many computational models of the fly optic lobe as a moving objects detector were suggested. Here we attempted to elucidate the mechanisms of ON-edge motion detection by a simulation approach based on the TEM connectome of Drosophila. Our simulation model of the optic lobe with the NEURON simulator that covers the full scale of ommatidia, reproduced the characteristics of the receptor neurons, lamina monopolar neurons, and T4 cells in the lobula. The contribution of each neuron can be estimated by changing synaptic connection strengths in the simulation and measuring the response to the motion stimulus. Those show the paradelle pathway provide motion detection in the fly optic lobe has more robustness and is more sophisticated than a simple combination of HR and BL systems.
Collapse
|
42
|
Shinomiya K, Nern A, Meinertzhagen IA, Plaza SM, Reiser MB. Neuronal circuits integrating visual motion information in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 2022; 32:3529-3544.e2. [PMID: 35839763 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The detection of visual motion enables sophisticated animal navigation, and studies on flies have provided profound insights into the cellular and circuit bases of this neural computation. The fly's directionally selective T4 and T5 neurons encode ON and OFF motion, respectively. Their axons terminate in one of the four retinotopic layers in the lobula plate, where each layer encodes one of the four directions of motion. Although the input circuitry of the directionally selective neurons has been studied in detail, the synaptic connectivity of circuits integrating T4/T5 motion signals is largely unknown. Here, we report a 3D electron microscopy reconstruction, wherein we comprehensively identified T4/T5's synaptic partners in the lobula plate, revealing a diverse set of new cell types and attributing new connectivity patterns to the known cell types. Our reconstruction explains how the ON- and OFF-motion pathways converge. T4 and T5 cells that project to the same layer connect to common synaptic partners and comprise a core motif together with bilayer interneurons, detailing the circuit basis for computing motion opponency. We discovered pathways that likely encode new directions of motion by integrating vertical and horizontal motion signals from upstream T4/T5 neurons. Finally, we identify substantial projections into the lobula, extending the known motion pathways and suggesting that directionally selective signals shape feature detection there. The circuits we describe enrich the anatomical basis for experimental and computations analyses of motion vision and bring us closer to understanding complete sensory-motor pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Shinomiya
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - Ian A Meinertzhagen
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Stephen M Plaza
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA
| | - Michael B Reiser
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gatto E, Loukola OJ, Petrazzini MEM, Agrillo C, Cutini S. Illusional Perspective across Humans and Bees. Vision (Basel) 2022; 6:28. [PMID: 35737416 PMCID: PMC9231007 DOI: 10.3390/vision6020028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For two centuries, visual illusions have attracted the attention of neurobiologists and comparative psychologists, given the possibility of investigating the complexity of perceptual mechanisms by using relatively simple patterns. Animal models, such as primates, birds, and fish, have played a crucial role in understanding the physiological circuits involved in the susceptibility of visual illusions. However, the comprehension of such mechanisms is still a matter of debate. Despite their different neural architectures, recent studies have shown that some arthropods, primarily Hymenoptera and Diptera, experience illusions similar to those humans do, suggesting that perceptual mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved among species. Here, we review the current state of illusory perception in bees. First, we introduce bees' visual system and speculate which areas might make them susceptible to illusory scenes. Second, we review the current state of knowledge on misperception in bees (Apidae), focusing on the visual stimuli used in the literature. Finally, we discuss important aspects to be considered before claiming that a species shows higher cognitive ability while equally supporting alternative hypotheses. This growing evidence provides insights into the evolutionary origin of visual mechanisms across species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Gatto
- Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Olli J. Loukola
- Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland;
| | | | - Christian Agrillo
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy; (M.E.M.P.); (C.A.)
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy;
| | - Simone Cutini
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy;
- Padua Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, 35129 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ryu L, Kim SY, Kim AJ. From Photons to Behaviors: Neural Implementations of Visual Behaviors in Drosophila. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:883640. [PMID: 35600623 PMCID: PMC9115102 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.883640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Neural implementations of visual behaviors in Drosophila have been dissected intensively in the past couple of decades. The availability of premiere genetic toolkits, behavioral assays in tethered or freely moving conditions, and advances in connectomics have permitted the understanding of the physiological and anatomical details of the nervous system underlying complex visual behaviors. In this review, we describe recent advances on how various features of a visual scene are detected by the Drosophila visual system and how the neural circuits process these signals and elicit an appropriate behavioral response. Special emphasis was laid on the neural circuits that detect visual features such as brightness, color, local motion, optic flow, and translating or approaching visual objects, which would be important for behaviors such as phototaxis, optomotor response, attraction (or aversion) to moving objects, navigation, and visual learning. This review offers an integrative framework for how the fly brain detects visual features and orchestrates an appropriate behavioral response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leesun Ryu
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Yong Kim
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Anmo J. Kim
- Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
An Artificial Visual System for Motion Direction Detection Based on the Hassenstein–Reichardt Correlator Model. ELECTRONICS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/electronics11091423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The perception of motion direction is essential for the survival of visual animals. Despite various theoretical and biophysical investigations that have been conducted to elucidate directional selectivity at the neural level, the systemic mechanism of motion direction detection remains elusive. Here, we develop an artificial visual system (AVS) based on the core computation of the Hassenstein–Reichardt correlator (HRC) model for global motion direction detection. With reference to the biological investigations of Drosophila, we first describe a local motion-sensitive, directionally detective neuron that only responds to ON motion signals with high pattern contrast in a particular direction. Then, we use the full-neurons scheme motion direction detection mechanism to detect the global motion direction based on our previous research. The mechanism enables our AVS to detect multiple directions in a two-dimensional view, and the global motion direction is inferred from the outputs of all local motion-sensitive directionally detective neurons. To verify the reliability of our AVS, we conduct a series of experiments and compare its performance with the time-considered convolution neural network (CNN) and the EfficientNetB0 under the same conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that our system is reliable in detecting the direction of motion, and among the three models, our AVS has better motion direction detection capabilities.
Collapse
|
46
|
Ketkar MD, Gür B, Molina-Obando S, Ioannidou M, Martelli C, Silies M. First-order visual interneurons distribute distinct contrast and luminance information across ON and OFF pathways to achieve stable behavior. eLife 2022; 11:74937. [PMID: 35263247 PMCID: PMC8967382 DOI: 10.7554/elife.74937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The accurate processing of contrast is the basis for all visually guided behaviors. Visual scenes with rapidly changing illumination challenge contrast computation because photoreceptor adaptation is not fast enough to compensate for such changes. Yet, human perception of contrast is stable even when the visual environment is quickly changing, suggesting rapid post receptor luminance gain control. Similarly, in the fruit fly Drosophila, such gain control leads to luminance invariant behavior for moving OFF stimuli. Here, we show that behavioral responses to moving ON stimuli also utilize a luminance gain, and that ON-motion guided behavior depends on inputs from three first-order interneurons L1, L2, and L3. Each of these neurons encodes contrast and luminance differently and distributes information asymmetrically across both ON and OFF contrast-selective pathways. Behavioral responses to both ON and OFF stimuli rely on a luminance-based correction provided by L1 and L3, wherein L1 supports contrast computation linearly, and L3 non-linearly amplifies dim stimuli. Therefore, L1, L2, and L3 are not specific inputs to ON and OFF pathways but the lamina serves as a separate processing layer that distributes distinct luminance and contrast information across ON and OFF pathways to support behavior in varying conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhura D Ketkar
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Burak Gür
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Molina-Obando
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maria Ioannidou
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carlotta Martelli
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Marion Silies
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tanaka 田中涼介 R, Clark DA. Identifying Inputs to Visual Projection Neurons in Drosophila Lobula by Analyzing Connectomic Data. eNeuro 2022; 9:ENEURO.0053-22.2022. [PMID: 35410869 PMCID: PMC9034759 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0053-22.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Electron microscopy (EM)-based connectomes provide important insights into how visual circuitry of fruit fly Drosophila computes various visual features, guiding and complementing behavioral and physiological studies. However, connectomic analyses of the lobula, a neuropil putatively dedicated to detecting object-like features, remains underdeveloped, largely because of incomplete data on the inputs to the brain region. Here, we attempted to map the columnar inputs into the Drosophila lobula neuropil by performing connectivity-based and morphology-based clustering on a densely reconstructed connectome dataset. While the dataset mostly lacked visual neuropils other than lobula, which would normally help identify inputs to lobula, our clustering analysis successfully extracted clusters of cells with homogeneous connectivity and morphology, likely representing genuine cell types. We were able to draw a correspondence between the resulting clusters and previously identified cell types, revealing previously undocumented connectivity between lobula input and output neurons. While future, more complete connectomic reconstructions are necessary to verify the results presented here, they can serve as a useful basis for formulating hypotheses on mechanisms of visual feature detection in lobula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Tanaka 田中涼介
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
| | - Damon A Clark
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
- Department of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Groschner LN, Malis JG, Zuidinga B, Borst A. A biophysical account of multiplication by a single neuron. Nature 2022; 603:119-123. [PMID: 35197635 PMCID: PMC8891015 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04428-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Nonlinear, multiplication-like operations carried out by individual nerve cells greatly enhance the computational power of a neural system1-3, but our understanding of their biophysical implementation is scant. Here we pursue this problem in the Drosophila melanogaster ON motion vision circuit4,5, in which we record the membrane potentials of direction-selective T4 neurons and of their columnar input elements6,7 in response to visual and pharmacological stimuli in vivo. Our electrophysiological measurements and conductance-based simulations provide evidence for a passive supralinear interaction between two distinct types of synapse on T4 dendrites. We show that this multiplication-like nonlinearity arises from the coincidence of cholinergic excitation and release from glutamatergic inhibition. The latter depends on the expression of the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluClα8,9 in T4 neurons, which sharpens the directional tuning of the cells and shapes the optomotor behaviour of the animals. Interacting pairs of shunting inhibitory and excitatory synapses have long been postulated as an analogue approximation of a multiplication, which is integral to theories of motion detection10,11, sound localization12 and sensorimotor control13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Birte Zuidinga
- Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhou B, Li Z, Kim S, Lafferty J, Clark DA. Shallow neural networks trained to detect collisions recover features of visual loom-selective neurons. eLife 2022; 11:72067. [PMID: 35023828 PMCID: PMC8849349 DOI: 10.7554/elife.72067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Animals have evolved sophisticated visual circuits to solve a vital inference problem: detecting whether or not a visual signal corresponds to an object on a collision course. Such events are detected by specific circuits sensitive to visual looming, or objects increasing in size. Various computational models have been developed for these circuits, but how the collision-detection inference problem itself shapes the computational structures of these circuits remains unknown. Here, inspired by the distinctive structures of LPLC2 neurons in the visual system of Drosophila, we build anatomically-constrained shallow neural network models and train them to identify visual signals that correspond to impending collisions. Surprisingly, the optimization arrives at two distinct, opposing solutions, only one of which matches the actual dendritic weighting of LPLC2 neurons. Both solutions can solve the inference problem with high accuracy when the population size is large enough. The LPLC2-like solutions reproduces experimentally observed LPLC2 neuron responses for many stimuli, and reproduces canonical tuning of loom sensitive neurons, even though the models are never trained on neural data. Thus, LPLC2 neuron properties and tuning are predicted by optimizing an anatomically-constrained neural network to detect impending collisions. More generally, these results illustrate how optimizing inference tasks that are important for an animal's perceptual goals can reveal and explain computational properties of specific sensory neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baohua Zhou
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
| | - Zifan Li
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, United States
| | - Sunnie Kim
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, United States
| | - John Lafferty
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, United States
| | - Damon A Clark
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gelperin A, Ambrosini AE. Quantitative Characterization of Output from the Directionally Selective Visual Interneuron H1 in the Grey Flesh Fly Sarcophaga bullata. JOURNAL OF UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE EDUCATION : JUNE : A PUBLICATION OF FUN, FACULTY FOR UNDERGRADUATE NEUROSCIENCE 2021; 20:A88-A99. [PMID: 35540945 PMCID: PMC9053427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
H1, a very well-studied insect visual interneuron, has a panoramic receptive field and is directionally selective in responding to optic flow. The synaptic basis for the directional selectivity of the H1 neuron has been studied using both theoretical and cellular approaches. Extracellular single-unit recordings are readily obtained by beginning students using commercially available adults of the grey flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata. We describe an apparatus which allows students to present a series of moving visual stimuli to the eye of the restrained, minimally dissected adult Sarcophaga, while recording both the single unit responses of the H1 neuron and the position and velocity of the moving stimulus. Students obtain quantitative and reproducible responses of H1, probing the response properties of the neuron by modulating stimulus parameters such as: direction and speed of movement, visual contrast, spatial wavelength, or the extent of the visual field occupied. Students learn to perform quantitative analysis of their data and to generate graphical representations of their results characterizing the tuning and receptive field of this neuron. This exercise demonstrates the utility of single unit recording of an identified interneuron in an awake restrained insect and promotes interpretation of these results in terms of the visual stimuli normally encountered by freely flying flies in their natural environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Gelperin
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
| | | |
Collapse
|