Patient advocacy: the role of the nurse

Nurses' attitude towards patient advocacy and its associated factor in East Gojjam Zone Public hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023

INTRODUCTION

One of the most important but underappreciated roles of nurses is patient advocacy. To advocate for patients effectively, the nurses should have a favorable attitude towards patient advocacy. Despite this fact, the nurses' attitude towards patient advocacy was not known in Ethiopia. Thus, this study aimed to assess nurses' attitude towards patient advocacy and its associated factors in East Gojjam Zone Public Hospitals, Northwest in 2023.

METHODS

Institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted among 385 nurses in East Gojjam Zone Public Hospitals from March 1 to April 30, 2023. Nurses were selected using simple random sampling techniques from 11 public hospitals. The data were collected in a self-administered way. Binary logistic regression was used for data analysis. All independent variables having a P value of < 0.25 in the bivariable logistic regression were fitted into a multivariable logistic regression. The AOR at a 95% confidence interval was used to identify the strength of the association, and a p value of 0.05 was used to declare it statistically significant at the final model.

RESULT

A total of 385 nurses participated in the study, for a 91% response rate. Among these, 49.9% of nurses had an unfavorable attitude. Being working in a primary hospital [AOR = 2.3; 95% CI: (1.4-3.8)], poor cooperation of nurses [AOR = 1.7; 95% CI: (1.1-2.8)], being unsatisfied with the job [AOR = 1.7; 95% CI: (1.1-2.7)], and poor perceived supervision of work [AOR = 6.2; 95% CI: (3.7-9.8)] were factors associated with nurses' attitudes towards patient advocacy.

CONCLUSION

The number of nurses who had an unfavorable attitude towards patient advocacy was high. Working in a primary hospital, poor cooperation with others, being dissatisfied with the job, and having an unfavorable perception towards the supervision of work were the factors associated with the unfavorable attitude of nurses towards patient advocacy. It is recommended that all hospitals better support the nurses to increase their job satisfaction and have good supervision of the nurses' activities.

Patient's best interest as viewed by nursing students

BACKGROUND

In recent years, patient advocacy has emerged as a prominent concept within healthcare. How nursing students decide what is best for their patients is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to examine nursing students' views on doing what is best for patients during their clinical experiences and how they seek to establish patient interests when providing care. Research questions guiding the interview were as follows: (1) What are nursing students' perceptions of patient interests? (2) What factors influence nursing students' perceptions of advocating for patient's interests?

RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive research using thematic analysis.

PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT

Data was collected through individual online interviews with nine nursing students with clinical experience.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by the University Research Ethics Committee. Participants provided digital informed consent.

RESULTS

The students asserted that they are able to understand the patients' interests by placing emphasis on the patients' needs. They believe that it is crucial to adopt a collaborative strategy for the provision of care to meet these requirements. In addition, some of them expressed concern over the most effective methods of advocating for the interests of patients. Three themes were identified. (1) Focussing on patient needs first, (2) taking a collective approach, and (3) learning how to advocate.

CONCLUSIONS

Students understand and value the ethical commitments associated with advocating for the patient's best interest by considering factors such as prioritising the patient's needs, adopting a strategy that involves everyone, and acquiring the ability to undertake the advocacy role. Additionally, nursing education strategies in clinical contexts require additional study to inspire students to do what is in their patient's best interests.

Registered nurses' perceptions of their roles in medical-surgical units: A qualitative study

AIM

The aim of this study was to gain insight into the perception of nurses about their roles in medical-surgical units.

BACKGROUND

As a result of ever-changing work environments, medical-surgical nurses find it difficult to know and practice according to the full scope of their roles.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study.

METHODS

Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 21 nurses on three campuses of a large tertiary care hospital located in Quebec, Canada. Thematic analysis was used to construe meaning from the interviews. This research adheres to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines and checklist.

RESULTS

The data analysis resulted in three main themes: (i) confusion in nurses' roles and scope of practice; (ii) challenges in the continuity of care and (iii) factors affecting the roles of nurses in medical-surgical units.

CONCLUSION

Attention must be paid to the care continuum as it represents a critical element for surgical patients' quality and safety of care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Medical-surgical nurses should understand their roles and the factors that limit their full scope of practice in order to provide and manage complex care situations. Additionally, an interdisciplinary approach is a strategy that may better respond to patients' clinical needs across the surgical journey.

Experiences of patient advocacy among nurses working in a resource constrained emergency department in Ghana

BACKGROUND

Patient advocacy at the emergency department is stressful and cumbersome as a result of the increasing patient-to-nurse ratio and high patient turnovers. It is also unclear what patient advocacy entails and the experiences of patient advocacy in a resource-constrained emergency department. This is significant because advocacy underpins the care provided in the emergency department.

AIM

The primary aim of this study is to explore the experiences and underpinning factors that influence patient advocacy among nurses working in a resource constrained emergency department.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative study was conducted among 15 purposively sampled ED nurses working at a resource-constrained secondary-level hospital facility. Study participants were individually interviewed via a recorded telephone conversation, after which the interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductively analyzed using the content analysis approach. The study participants described patient advocacy, situations in which they advocated for patients, the factors that motivated them and the challenges they encountered practicing patient advocacy.

RESULTS

Three major themes generated from the study included: "stories of advocacy", "motivating" factors and "challenging" factors. ED nurses understood patient advocacy and also advocated for patients in various instances. There were factors such as personal upbringing, professional training and religious training that motivated them and they were challenged by negative inter-professional experiences, patient and relatives' attitudes and healthcare system factors.

CONCLUSION

Participants understood patient advocacy and incorporated it into daily nursing care. Unsuccessful advocacy causes disappointment and frustrations. There were no documented guidelines on patient advocacy.

Impact of nurse-surgeons on patient-centred outcomes: A systematic review

Background

Nurse-surgeons have been performing surgeries for decades. Yet, their impact on perioperative clinical outcomes has not been explored in detail.

Objective

To investigate the impact of nurse-surgeons on patient-centred outcomes.

Design

Systematic review.

Method

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram and checklist for systematic reviews were used as the screening and reporting guideline. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases were searched for articles that fit the review's eligibility criteria. A combination of Medical Subject Headings, keywords and filters for each database were used. Following screening and full text review, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework for certainty and confidence assessment. Narrative synthesis was used to report the findings due to the design heterogeneity of the included studies.

Results

Forty-eight (n = 48) patient-centred outcomes were identified from 25 included studies. These outcomes were grouped into four categories: patient satisfaction and experience; waiting list; perioperative complications; and quality of surgical care. Patient satisfaction and experience was rated high to very high in 16 studies; none reported patient dissatisfaction. Waiting lists improved in eight studies. Perioperative complications were none to very low in nine studies. Mortality rates in the nurse-surgeon group were better than the physician group in three studies. The quality of care in the performance of surgeries by nurse-surgeons was either similar or better than physicians in ten studies.

Conclusions

Nurse-surgeons performed safe, satisfactory, and high-quality surgeries with minimal perioperative complications similar to physicians. The use of nurse-surgeons has significantly reduced waiting lists regardless of surgical speciality. Policies around nurse-surgeon practice needs to be developed at national and international levels to streamline the delivery of much needed surgical services amidst the coronavirus pandemic in the areas of cancer diagnostic surgeries, emergency surgeries, minor surgeries, and remote and rural health.

Treatment withdrawal of the patient on end of life: An analysis of values, ethics and guidelines in palliative care

AIM

Family surrogate decision-making during the later stage of a patient's life may sometimes result in conflict and emotional distress among the parties involved. The present article aims to promote ethical end-of-life decision-making among healthcare professionals in a view to eliminating any misunderstanding that may arise while meeting the care needs of the patient.

DESIGN

A case study involving a request for treatment withdrawal by the family of a patient on end of life.

METHODS

This paper draws upon a scenario encountered during practice to analyse the moral commitments in delivering high-quality end-of-life care with much emphasis on pre-existing palliative care guidelines for adults.

RESULTS

Healthcare professionals are bound by the principle of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice. Although the use of guidelines may be tenable, decisions often take into consideration the patient's choice and then weighed against the moral values of healthcare specialists and those required in the profession.

Addressing the psychosocial needs of young people with thalassaemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation

Beta thalassaemia major is an inherited condition that causes severe anaemia. Patients with the condition require regular blood transfusions. One curative treatment option available is bone marrow transplantation, but a bone marrow transplant is a high-risk, painful procedure requiring prolonged hospitalisation. Undergoing such a disruptive treatment can be a source of great anxiety for young people and their families, who will need honest, sensitive and empathetic communication, person-centred care, support to socialise and access education, involvement in decision-making and signposting to financial support. This article discusses the role of children's nurses in addressing the psychosocial needs of young people with thalassaemia who undergo bone marrow transplantation and in supporting young people's families.

Facilitators of the health advocacy role practice of the nurse in Ghana: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Identifying facilitators of health advocacy role practice of nurses is important in reducing health disparities and inequities in Ghana. The struggle to reducing these disparities and inequities needs a combination of bravery, courage, and professionalism. In many instances, many barriers hinder nurses from practicing their health advocacy role in Ghana. Facilitators that motivate nurses who would perform this health advocacy role have not been identified and adequately described in Ghana.

AIM

To explore and describe the facilitators of the health advocacy role of nurses in Ghana.

METHODS

This qualitative study used Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory approach to collect and analyze data from 2018 to 2019 in three regions in Ghana. Semistructured interviews (n = 24) and field notes were used to collect data.

RESULTS

Professional influence emerged as a core category among other three facilitators that motivate nurses to perform the health advocacy role. The other three are clientele influence, intrinsic influence, and cultural influence.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilitators to the health advocacy role practice of nurses are multidimensional and hidden. In this respect, educating hospital managers on these facilitators should be done through workshops and seminars to enhance the managers' strategies of motivating nurses to advocate for the less privileged and the disadvantaged of the society.

Professional identity and hospital-based registered nurses: A phenomenological study

INTRODUCTION

Nurses continue to struggle to define their role as professionals in the hospital-setting often being represented in media as less competent than other health care providers. Paradoxically, an annual poll of the public consistently identifies nursing as the most trusted profession. This dichotomy of simultaneously being considered incompetent yet holding a high level of trust leads nurses to question their own professional identity. A gap exists in the literature about the professional identity of nurses who work directly with patients in the hospital environment.

METHODOLOGY

Therefore, the aim of this interpretive phenomenology study was to describe the lived experience of nurses working with patients in the hospital environment and the meaning of this phenomenon as it relates to their professional identity.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: (a) being validated as an expert by providers within the healthcare system; (b) working well as a valued member of a team; (c) advocating for the patient's needs despite opposition; and (d) Valuing human-ness in the patient.

IMPLICATIONS

The findings provide a deeper representation of the practice of hospital-based nurses and implications for Anchornurses to be empowered in their workplace.

Perceived Roles of Bhutanese Health Care Professionals in Improving Patient Safety: A Qualitative Exploratory Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patient safety is a vital component of high quality health care and all health care professionals have a responsibility for ensuring the delivery of safe care to patients. However, little is known about how Bhutanese health care professionals perceive their roles in improving patient safety. This study aimed to explore how Bhutanese health care professionals, educators, managers, and policy makers perceived their roles in improving patient safety.

METHODS

Undertaken as a naturalistic inquiry using a qualitative exploratory descriptive research approach, a criterion-based stratified purposive sample of 94 health care professionals and managers from the Ministry of Health, a training institute, and 3 levels of hospitals were interviewed. All interview data were analyzed using content and thematic analysis strategies.

RESULTS

Data analysis identified 4 broad themes. Health care professionals' perceived role in safety and quality included formulating and implementing patient safety rules; management and administration of units and hospitals; patient assessment and management; and setting professional norms (including norms about peer influence and patient care/interaction).

CONCLUSION

The findings revealed that Bhutanese health care professionals were aware of their roles in improving patient safety processes and practices, and providing interprofessional education or training to all levels of health care professionals could help improve communication and patient safety in the Bhutanese health care system.

Improving access to primary care services for those on low income: voluntary advocacy

Nurses in primary care are often the first point of access for those seeking health care, and it is well known that accessing health services can be difficult for some, especially those on a low income. A charity initiative has been developed in a low-income area in England to help such individuals, wherein volunteers help local residents to access local services and support. This study explores the experiences of service users in order to understand their perceptions and feelings about the service, using an instrumental case study method with semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were collected from six service users and transcribed by the researcher for subsequent thematic analysis. The participants' experiences were characterised by reduced social isolation, reduced emotional distress, improved mobility and transport options, improved confidence and control over life, and effective management of memory issues. Various aspects of advocacy and empowerment were also observed. Further, the coping strategies used by the participants while facing the challenges of social isolation and ageing were highlighted. The findings provide important insight into the support needs of populations on low income, the ways in which they access healthcare and how the volunteer service can best support them.

In the child's best interests: should life be sustained when further treatment is futile?

The aim of this article is to explore the concept of medical futility and the withdrawal of care for children in intensive care units. There have been several recent cases where medical staff have considered that there was no possibility of recovery for a child, yet their clinical judgments were challenged by the parents. The private anguish of these families became public, social media heightened emotions and this was followed by political and religious intrusion. Innovations in medical treatment and technological advances raise issues for all those involved in the care of children and young people especially when decisions need to be made about end of life care. Healthcare professionals have a moral and legal obligation to determine when treatment should cease in cases where it is determined to be futile. The aim should be to work collaboratively with parents but all decisions must be made in the best interests of the child. However, medical staff and parents may have differing opinions about care decisions. In part, this may be as a result of their unique relationships with the child and different understanding of the extent to which the child is in discomfort or can endure pain.

Management Strategies in the Intensive Care Unit to Improve Psychosocial Outcomes

Critical care nurses work in challenging environments that are often sterile, impersonal, noisy, and frightening to patients and their families. Nurses act as liaisons between medical professionals and patients and their families in multiple specialty intensive care units. Critical care nursing practice, guided by the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics, respects patients' religious, spiritual, and cultural beliefs, contributing to holistic care delivery. Therapeutic psychosocial outcomes of holistic care delivery and patient advocacy are explored. Personalized psychosocial care through treating patients holistically will support and maintain positive psychosocial outcomes in intensive care units across the country.

Registered Nurses' description of patient advocacy in the clinical setting

AIM

To provide Registered Nurses description of patient advocacy in the clinical setting.

DESIGN

A qualitative approach with descriptive study design was used to meet the set objective.

METHODS

Purposive sampling was used to select the study participants. Through semi-structured interview, data were collected from 25 participants, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The Registered Nurses described patient advocacy as promoting patient safety and quality care which includes the following: protecting patients, being patients' voice, provision of quality care and interpersonal relationship as well as educating patients. The nurses had adequate understanding of patient advocacy and were willing to advocate for patients. There is, however, a need to research into barriers to patient advocacy in the clinical setting. This study made significant contribution to the understanding of patient advocacy and its positive effect on the provision of quality patient care.

Patient advocacy in nursing: A concept analysis

Background:

The concept of patient advocacy is still poorly understood and not clearly conceptualized. Therefore, there is a gap between the ideal of patient advocacy and the reality of practice. In order to increase nursing actions as a patient advocate, a comprehensive and clear definition of this concept is necessary.

Research objective:

This study aimed to offer a comprehensive and clear definition of patient advocacy.

Research design:

A total of 46 articles and 2 books published between 1850 and 2016 and related to the concept of patient advocacy were selected from six databases and considered for concept analysis based on Rodgers’ evolutionary approach.

Ethical considerations:

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tarbiat Modares University.

Findings:

The attributes of patient advocacy are safeguarding (track medical errors, and protecting patients from incompetency or misconduct of co-workers and other members of healthcare team), apprising (providing information about the patient’s diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, suggesting alternatives of healthcare, and providing information about discharge program), valuing (maintaining self-control, enabling patients to make decisions freely, maintaining individualization and humanity, maintaining patient privacy, and acting in the patients’ values, culture, beliefs, and preferences), mediating (liaison between patients, families, and healthcare professionals, being patients’ voice, and communicate patient preferences and cultural values to members of the healthcare team), and championing social justice in the provision of healthcare (confronting inappropriate policies or rules in the healthcare system, identifying and correcting inequalities in delivery of health services, and facilitating access to community health services and health resources).

Discussion and conclusion:

The analysis of this concept can help to develop educational or managerial theories, design instruments for evaluating the performance of nurses in patient advocacy, develop strategies for enhancing patient advocacy, and improve the safety and quality of nursing care in the community and healthcare system.

Registered nurses' provision of end-of-life care to hospitalised adults: A mixed studies review

OBJECTIVES

To describe, critically appraise and synthesise research regarding nurses' perceptions of their knowledge, skills or experiences in providing end-of-life care to hospitalised adults to help inform both future educational and practice initiatives.

DESIGN

Mixed studies review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases were searched for the years 2004-June 2018, along with journal hand-searching and reference list searching.

REVIEW METHODS

Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of studies. Data extraction and quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was conducted independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Study findings were synthesised thematically.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Of them, ten were quantitative, eight qualitative and one mixed-method. All but one quantitative study were conducted in the United States and all but one used some form of survey. The qualitative studies were conducted in a variety of countries and all but one used some form of interview for data collection. Five themes were identified including nurse as a protecting provider, nurse as an advocate, nurse as a reflective practitioner, obstacles to providing quality end-of-life care and aids to providing quality end-of-life care.

CONCLUSIONS

Registered Nurses have aligned their end-of-life care with practice with the profession's expectations and are enacting a patient centred approach to their practice. They rely on reflective practices and on the support of others to overcome organisational, educational and emotional the challenges they to providing quality end-of-life care.

AÇÕES DOS ENFERMEIROS NO EXERCÍCIO DA ADVOCACIA DO PACIENTE: REVISÃO INTEGRATIVA

RESUMO: Objetivo: identificar as ações dos enfermeiros no exercício da advocacia do paciente, na literatura científica internacional publicada nos últimos dez anos. Método: revisão integrativa da literatura, cujos dados foram coletados na base de dados Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature e SAGE Journals Online, utilizando-se os descritores "patient advocacy" e "nursing", sendo encontrados 27 artigos. Resultados: como resultados, emergiram duas categorias: ações de advocacia exercidas por enfermeiros em diferentes nações e culturas; e ações de advocacia nos diferentes ambientes de atuação dos enfermeiros. Conclusão: acredita-se que os achados deste estudo poderão contribuir para a produção de pesquisas e conhecimentos em enfermagem, ampliando a compreensão da advocacia do paciente como um componente ético da prática dos enfermeiros.