A Systematic Review on Cognitive Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Asian Patients

A perspective on translating genomic discoveries into targets for brain-machine interface and deep brain stimulation devices

Mental illnesses have a huge impact on individuals, families, and society, so there is a growing need for more efficient treatments. In this context, brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has the potential to revolutionize the options for neuropsychiatric therapies. However, the development of BCI-based therapies faces enormous challenges, such as power dissipation constraints, lack of credible feedback mechanisms, uncertainty of which brain areas and frequencies to target, and even which patients to treat. Some of these setbacks are due to the large gap in our understanding of brain function. In recent years, large-scale genomic analyses uncovered an unprecedented amount of information regarding the biology of the altered brain function observed across the psychopathology spectrum. We believe findings from genetic studies can be useful to refine BCI technology to develop novel treatment options for mental illnesses. Here, we assess the latest advancements in both fields, the possibilities that can be generated from their intersection, and the challenges that these research areas will need to address to ensure that translational efforts can lead to effective and reliable interventions. Specifically, starting from highlighting the overlap between mechanisms uncovered by large-scale genetic studies and the current targets of deep brain stimulation treatments, we describe the steps that could help to translate genomic discoveries into BCI targets. Because these two research areas have not been previously presented together, the present article can provide a novel perspective for scientists with different research backgrounds. This article is categorized under: Neurological Diseases > Genetics/Genomics/Epigenetics Neurological Diseases > Biomedical Engineering.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation for schizophrenia: a systematic review of randomized controlled studies

Background

In randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the application of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in schizophrenia, inconsistent results have been reported. The purpose of this exploratory systematic review of RCTs was to evaluate tACS as an adjunct treatment for patients with schizophrenia based on its therapeutic effects, tolerability, and safety.

Methods

Our analysis included RCTs that evaluated adjunctive tACS' effectiveness, tolerability, and safety in schizophrenia patients. Three independent authors extracted data and synthesized it using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Three RCTs involving 76 patients with schizophrenia were encompassed in the analysis, with 40 participants receiving active tACS and 36 receiving sham tACS. Our study revealed a significant superiority of active tACS over sham tACS in improving total psychopathology (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.12, -0.10; I2 = 16%, p = 0.02) and negative psychopathology (SMD = -0.65, 95% CI: -1.11, -0.18; I2 = 0%, p = 0.007) in schizophrenia. The two groups, however, showed no significant differences in positive psychopathology, general psychopathology, or auditory hallucinations (all p > 0.05). Two RCTs examined the neurocognitive effects of tACS, yielding varied findings. Both groups demonstrated similar rates of discontinuation due to any reason and adverse events (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Adjunctive tACS is promising as a viable approach for mitigating total and negative psychopathology in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. However, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of tACS's therapeutic effects in schizophrenia, it is imperative to conduct extensive, meticulously planned, and well-documented RCTs.

Roles of prokineticin 2 in electroconvulsive shock-induced memory impairment via regulation of phenotype polarization in astrocytes

Electroconvulsive shock (ECT) is the most effective treatment for depression but can impair learning and memory. ECT is increasingly being shown to activate astrocytes and induce neuroinflammation, resulting in cognitive decline. Activated astrocytes can differentiate into two subtypes, A1-type astrocytes and A2-type astrocytes. Regarding cognitive function, neurotoxic A1 astrocytes and neuroprotective A2 astrocytes may exhibit opposite effects. Specifically, prokineticin 2 (PK2) functions as an essential mediator of inflammation and induces a selective A2-protective phenotype in astrocytes. This study aimed to clarify how PK2 promotes improved learning memory following electroconvulsive shock (ECS). As part of the study, rats were modeled using chronic unpredictable mild stress. Behavioral experiments were conducted to assess their cognitive abilities and depression-like behaviors. Western blot was used to determine the expression of PK2. Immunohistochemical and electron microscopy analyses of the hippocampal CA1 region were conducted to study the activation of astrocyte subtypes and synaptic ultrastructure, respectively. In this study, rats' spatial learning and memory impairment began to improve as activated A1-subtype astrocytes gradually decreased, and PK2 and A2 phenotype activation peaked on the third day after ECS. PKRA7 (PK2 antagonist) inhibits A2-type astrocyte activation partially and suppresses spatial learning and memory improvement. Collectively, our findings support that PK2 may induce a selective modulation of astrocytic polarization to a protective phenotype to promote learning and memory improvement after ECS.