1
|
Bean E, Knez J, Setty T, Tetteh A, Casagrandi D, Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. Natural history of endometriosis in pregnancy: ultrasound study of morphology of deep endometriosis and ovarian endometrioma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:585-593. [PMID: 37448233 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the morphological appearance of deep endometriosis and ovarian endometrioma in pregnancy using pelvic ultrasound examination. METHODS This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted over 3 years at University College London Hospital, which is a tertiary level referral unit for early pregnancy complications and an accredited endometriosis center. All women who participated provided written consent and were invited for surveillance ultrasound examination at the time of their routine scans in pregnancy. All scans were performed by a single operator to eliminate interobserver variability. The change in size of ovarian endometrioma and nodules was reported as change in their mean diameter. Ovarian endometrioma with irregular thick inner walls, hyperechoic papillary projections and/or high vascularity and hyperechoic nodules with moderate to high vascularity were reported as decidualized. RESULTS Sixty-five women with a live, normally sited pregnancy and concomitant ultrasound features of deep and/or ovarian endometriosis were included in the study. The median age of the study population was 34 (range, 23-44) years, and the median gestational age at presentation was 7 + 6 (range, 3 + 6 to 18 + 0) weeks. From the cohort, 47/65 (72%) were nulliparous, 48/65 (74%) had a previous diagnosis of endometriosis and 19/65 (29%) conceived via in-vitro fertilization. There were 10/65 (15% (95% CI, 7-24%)) women with ovarian endometrioma alone, 28/65 (43% (95% CI, 31-55%)) with endometriotic nodules alone and the remaining 27/65 (42% (95% CI, 30-54%)) had both. Of the women with ovarian endometrioma who underwent follow-up, 29/34 (85% (95% CI, 73-97%)) experienced cyst regression, 2/34 (6% (95% CI, 0-14%)) experienced cyst growth, and in 3/34 (9% (95% CI, 0.0-18%)) women, cyst size was unchanged. In 10/34 (29% (95% CI, 14-45%)), there was complete resolution of all cysts. Of the women with nodules who underwent follow-up, 43/51 (84% (95% CI, 74-94%)) experienced nodule regression, 2/51 (4% (95% CI, 0-9%)) experienced nodule growth and, in 6/51 (12% (95% CI, 3-21%)) women, nodule size was unchanged. In 4/51 (8% (95% CI, 0-15%)) women, there was complete resolution of all nodules. In 5/37 (14% (95% CI, 3-25%)) women who attended postnatal follow-up, complete resolution of all endometriotic lesions occurred during pregnancy. In 10/34 (29% (95% CI, 14-45%)) women with ovarian endometrioma and 27/51 (53% (95% CI, 39-67%)) women with nodules, a pattern of growth was observed in the first and second trimesters, followed by regression later in pregnancy. Features of decidualization were observed in 17/34 (50% (95% CI, 33-67%)) women with ovarian endometrioma, most commonly in the first trimester, and in 25/51 (49% (95% CI, 35-63%)) women with nodules, most commonly in the second trimester. CONCLUSIONS For the majority of women, despite features of decidualization being common in the first and second trimesters, ovarian endometrioma and deep nodules regress during pregnancy. Morphological changes of endometriosis in pregnancy are difficult to differentiate from characteristics of malignant lesions. Better understanding of the appearance of endometriosis in pregnancy is vital to minimize intervention and help counsel women regarding their condition. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bean
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Knez
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- University Medical Center Maribor, Clinic for Gynecology, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - T Setty
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Tetteh
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Casagrandi
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Naftalin
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Jurkovic
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lechner M, Liu J, Counsell N, Gillespie D, Chandrasekharan D, Ta NH, Jumani K, Gupta R, Rocke J, Williams C, Tetteh A, Amnolsingh R, Khwaja S, Batterham RL, Yan CH, Treibel TA, Moon JC, Woods J, Brunton R, Boardman J, Hatter M, Abdelwahab M, Holsinger FC, Capasso R, Nayak JV, Hwang PH, Patel ZM, Paun S, Eynon-Lewis N, Kumar BN, Jayaraj S, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Lund VJ. The burden of olfactory dysfunction during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Rhinology 2023; 61:93-96. [PMID: 36286227 DOI: 10.4193/rhin22.232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M Lechner
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK; ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - J Liu
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Counsell
- CRUK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Gillespie
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Chandrasekharan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - N H Ta
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - K Jumani
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Gupta
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Rocke
- ENT Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - C Williams
- ENT Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - A Tetteh
- ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Amnolsingh
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Khwaja
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R L Batterham
- Centre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, UK; Bariatric Centre for Weight Management and Metabolic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - C H Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, USA
| | - T A Treibel
- National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - J C Moon
- National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - J Woods
- The Norfolk Smell and Taste Clinic, Norfolk and Waveney ENT Service, UK
| | - R Brunton
- ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - M Hatter
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - M Abdelwahab
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - F C Holsinger
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - R Capasso
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - J V Nayak
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - P H Hwang
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Z M Patel
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - S Paun
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Eynon-Lewis
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - B N Kumar
- ENT Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - S Jayaraj
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Hopkins
- ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Philpott
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; The Norfolk Smell and Taste Clinic, Norfolk and Waveney ENT Service, UK
| | - V J Lund
- Royal National ENT Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banerjee A, Al‐Dabbach Z, Bredaki FE, Casagrandi D, Tetteh A, Greenwold N, Ivan M, Jurkovic D, David AL, Napolitano R. Reproducibility of assessment of full-dilatation Cesarean section scar in women undergoing second-trimester screening for preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60:396-403. [PMID: 35809243 PMCID: PMC9545619 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the reproducibility of a standardized method of measuring the Cesarean section (CS) scar, CS scar niche and their position relative to the internal os of the uterine cervix by transvaginal ultrasound in pregnant women with a previous full-dilatation CS. METHODS This was a prospective, single-center reproducibility study on women with a singleton pregnancy and a previous full-dilatation CS who underwent transvaginal ultrasound assessment of cervical length and CS scar characteristics at 14-24 weeks' gestation. The CS scar was identified as a hypoechogenic linear discontinuity of the myometrium at the anterior wall of the lower uterine segment or cervix. The CS scar niche was identified as an indentation at the site of the scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. The CS scar position was evaluated by measuring the distance to the internal cervical os. CS scar niche parameters, including its length, depth, width, and residual and adjacent myometrial thickness, were assessed in the sagittal and transverse planes. Qualitative reproducibility was assessed by agreement regarding visibility of the CS scar and niche. Quantitative reproducibility of CS scar measurements was assessed using three sets of images: (1) real-time two-dimensional (2D) images (real-time acquisition and caliper placement on 2D images by two operators), (2) offline 2D still images (offline caliper placement by two operators on stored 2D images acquired by one operator) and (3) three-dimensional (3D) volume images (volume manipulation and caliper placement on 2D images extracted by two operators). Agreement on CS scar visibility and the presence of a niche was analyzed using kappa coefficients. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of quantitative measurements was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS To achieve the desired statistical power, 72 women were recruited. The CS scar was visualized in > 80% of images. Interobserver agreement for scar visualization and presence of a niche in real-time 2D images was excellent (kappa coefficients of 0.84 and 0.85, respectively). Overall, reproducibility was higher for real-time 2D and offline 2D still images than for 3D volume images. The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for intraobserver reproducibility were between ± 1.1 and ± 3.6 mm for all sets of images; the 95% LOA for interobserver reproducibility were between ± 2.0 and ± 6.3 mm. Measurement of the distance from the CS scar to the internal cervical os was the most reproducible 2D measurement (intraobserver and interobserver 95% LOA within ± 1.6 and ± 2.7 mm, respectively). Overall, niche measurements were the least reproducible measurements (intraobserver 95% LOA between ± 1.6 and ± 3.6 mm; interobserver 95% LOA between ± 3.1 and ± 6.3 mm). There was no consistent difference between measurements obtained by reacquisition of 2D images (planes obtained twice and caliper placed), caliper placement on 2D stored images or volume manipulation (planes obtained twice and caliper placed). CONCLUSIONS The CS scar position and scar niche in pregnant women with a previous full-dilatation CS can be assessed in the second trimester of a subsequent pregnancy using either 2D or 3D volume ultrasound imaging with a high level of reproducibility. Overall, the most reproducible CS scar parameter is the distance from the CS scar to the internal cervical os. The method proposed in this study should enable clinicians to assess the CS scar reliably and may help predict pregnancy outcome. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Banerjee
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Z. Al‐Dabbach
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - F. E. Bredaki
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - D. Casagrandi
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Tetteh
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - N. Greenwold
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - M. Ivan
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - D. Jurkovic
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
- Department of GynaecologyElizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - A. L. David
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
- National Institute for Health Research, University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research CentreLondonUK
| | - R. Napolitano
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson WingUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lechner M, Liu J, Counsell N, Gillespie D, Chandrasekharan D, Ta NH, Jumani K, Gupta R, Rao-Merugumala S, Rocke J, Williams C, Tetteh A, Amnolsingh R, Khwaja S, Batterham RL, Yan CH, Treibel TA, Moon JC, Woods J, Brunton R, Boardman J, Paun S, Eynon-Lewis N, Kumar BN, Jayaraj S, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Lund VJ. The COVANOS trial - insight into post-COVID olfactory dysfunction and the role of smell training. Rhinology 2022; 60:188-199. [PMID: 35901492 DOI: 10.4193/rhin21.470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Olfactory dysfunction is a cardinal symptom of COVID-19 infection, however, studies assessing long-term olfactory dysfunction are limited and no randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) of early olfactory training have been conducted. METHODOLOGY We conducted a prospective, multi-centre study consisting of baseline psychophysical measurements of smell and taste function. Eligible participants were further recruited into a 12-week RCT of olfactory training versus control (safety information). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using an electronic survey and BSIT at baseline and 12 weeks. An additional 1-year follow-up was open to all participants. RESULTS 218 individuals with a sudden loss of sense of smell of at least 4-weeks were recruited. Psychophysical smell loss was observed in only 32.1%; 63 participants were recruited into the RCT. The absolute difference in BSIT improvement after 12 weeks was 0.45 higher in the intervention arm. 76 participants completed 1-year follow-up; 10/19 (52.6%) of participants with an abnormal baseline BSIT test scored below the normal threshold at 1-year, and 24/29 (82.8%) had persistent parosmia. CONCLUSIONS Early olfactory training may be helpful, although our findings are inconclusive. Notably, a number of individuals who completed the 1-year assessment had persistent smell loss and parosmia at 1-year. As such, both should be considered important entities of long-Covid and further studies to improve management are highly warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lechner
- ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Liu
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Counsell
- CRUK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Gillespie
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - N H Ta
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - K Jumani
- ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - R Gupta
- ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - J Rocke
- ENT Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - C Williams
- ENT Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - A Tetteh
- ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Amnolsingh
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Khwaja
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R L Batterham
- Centre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, UK; Bariatric Centre for Weight Management and Metabolic Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - C H Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, USA
| | - T A Treibel
- National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - J C Moon
- National Institute for Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - J Woods
- The Norfolk Smell and Taste Clinic, Norfolk
| | - R Brunton
- ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - S Paun
- ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - B N Kumar
- ENT Department, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - S Jayaraj
- ENT Department, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - C Hopkins
- ENT Department, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Philpott
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; The Norfolk Smell and Taste Clinic, Norfolk and Waveney ENT Service, UK
| | - V J Lund
- Royal National ENT Hospital, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Panda R, Ariyarathna H, Amnuaycheewa P, Tetteh A, Pramod SN, Taylor SL, Ballmer-Weber BK, Goodman RE. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety. Allergy 2013; 68:142-51. [PMID: 23205714 DOI: 10.1111/all.12076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Premarket, genetically modified (GM) plants are assessed for potential risks of food allergy. The major risk would be transfer of a gene encoding an allergen or protein nearly identical to an allergen into a different food source, which can be assessed by specific serum testing. The potential that a newly expressed protein might become an allergen is evaluated based on resistance to digestion in pepsin and abundance in food fractions. If the modified plant is a common allergenic source (e.g. soybean), regulatory guidelines suggest testing for increases in the expression of endogenous allergens. Some regulators request evaluating endogenous allergens for rarely allergenic plants (e.g. maize and rice). Since allergic individuals must avoid foods containing their allergen (e.g. peanut, soybean, maize, or rice), the relevance of the tests is unclear. Furthermore, no acceptance criteria are established and little is known about the natural variation in allergen concentrations in these crops. Our results demonstrate a 15-fold difference in the major maize allergen, lipid transfer protein between nine varieties, and complex variation in IgE binding to various soybean varieties. We question the value of evaluating endogenous allergens in GM plants unless the intent of the modification was production of a hypoallergenic crop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Panda
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Adu-Aryee N, Asumanu E, Tetteh A, Fordjour E, Naaeder S. Intestinal obstruction caused by retained surgical sponge: two case reports. Ghana Med J 2007; 39:37-8. [PMID: 17299540 PMCID: PMC1790808 DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v39i1.35980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
SummaryWe present two cases of intestinal obstruction from retained laparotomy packs and their management. Attention to detail in theatre procedure should reduce such occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Adu-Aryee
- Departments of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 77, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|