Incidence and risk factors of cardiovascular mortality in patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are common and fatal. Improved cancer-directed therapies, with thier substantial role in improving cancer-specific survival, may increase non-cancer mortality-including cardiovascular mortality-in these patients.

AIM

To identify the risk factors of cardiovascular mortality in GI adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

Data of GI adenocarcinoma patients were gathered from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. We used Pearson's chi-square test to assess the relationships between categorical variables. We used the Kaplan-Meyer test in the univariate analysis and Cox regression test for the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 556,350 included patients, 275,118 (49.6%) died due to adenocarcinoma, 64,079 (11.5%) died due to cardiovascular causes, and 83,161 (14.9%) died due to other causes. Higher rates of cardiovascular mortality were found in patients ≥ 50 years (HR, 8.476; 95% CI, 7.91-9.083), separated (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.184-1.361) and widowed (HR, 1.867; 95% CI, 1.812-1.924), patients with gastric (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.1-1.265) or colorectal AC (HR, 1.123; 95% CI, 1.053-1.198), and patients not undergone surgery (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.958-2.126). Lower risk patients include females (HR, 0.729; 95% CI, 0.717-0.742), blacks (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.924-0.978), married (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.749-0.792), divorced (HR, 0.841; 95% CI, 0.807-0.877), patients with pancreatic AC (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.757-0.91), and patients treated with chemotherapy (HR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.406-0.427).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in GI adenocarcinoma include advanced age, males, whites, separated and widowed, gastric or colorectal adenocarcinoma, advanced grade or advanced stage of the disease, no chemotherapy, and no surgery. Married and divorced, and patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma have a lower risk.

Gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis: An updated review

The gastrointestinal tract (GI) is the second most affected organ system in individuals suffering from systemic/localized scleroderma (SSc) or localized scleroderma. SSc can affect any part of the GI, between the oral cavity and anorectum. The annual incidence of SSc in the United States is estimated to be 19.3 cases per million adults, with the highest incidence reported in people aged 44 to 55. Females are 5 times more likely than males to suffer from SSc. Morbidity and mortality rates associated with SSc are predominantly elevated among patients with GI manifestations. Esophageal and intestinal manifestations impact 90% and 40% to 70% of patients with systemic scleroderma, respectively. SSc patients are known to suffer from small bowel hypomotility and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, which cause malabsorption and malnutrition, ultimately contributing to the 50% mortality rate. Fecal incontinence is a common symptom of SSc that can lead to depression. SSc patients may suffer from gastrointestinal complications that can negatively impact their quality of life on a daily basis. Multidisciplinary approaches are necessary for systematically managing gastrointestinal complications associated with SSc. A prospective study should focus on developing targeted therapies to improve recovery patterns and prognosis in cases of SSc. This article summarizes the epidemiology, commonly reported clinical manifestations, complications, and available treatments for treating GI pathology in SSc patients.

Continuous Infusion Low-Dose Unfractionated Heparin for the Management of Hypercoagulability Associated With COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with severe hypercoagulability. There is currently limited evidence supporting the routine use of therapeutic anticoagulation in the setting of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the incidence of thromboembolic events in adult patients with COVID-19 treated with an unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion versus prophylactic dose anticoagulation. Secondary objectives included exploration of the efficacy and safety of an UFH infusion through the evaluation of organ function and incidence of minor and major bleeding.

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study with propensity score matching of COVID-19 patients who received an UFH infusion targeting an aPTT between 40 and 60 seconds.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in this study. There was no difference in the composite of thromboembolic events comprised of venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and catheter-related thrombosis between the UFH and control group (17.9% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.19). There was a significant increase in median D-dimer concentrations from day 1 to day 7 in the control group (475 ng/mL [291-999] vs. 10820 ng/mL [606-21033], P = 0.04). Patients treated with UFH had a higher incidence of minor bleeding (35.7% vs. 0%, P < 0.005) and required more units of packed red blood cell transfusion (0.8 units ± 1.6 vs. 0 units, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Continuous infusion of UFH for patients with COVID-19 infection did not decrease the overall incidence of thromboembolic complications. UFH was associated with stabilization of D-dimer concentrations and increased rates of minor bleeding and transfusions.

Biliary Anastomosis Using T-tube Versus No T-tube for Liver Transplantation in Adults: A Review of Literature

The T-tube-directed biliary anastomosis in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) aims to minimize preventable biliary complications, including bile leaks and strictures. Biliary complications in patients with OLT increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. This review paper evaluated the current evidence on the routine use of T-tube reconstruction in OLT cases.

A review of prospective, retrospective, observational, cohort studies as well as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review papers, and opinion papers has been conducted to evaluate the therapeutic potential of T tube-based biliary anastomosis in cases of OLT.

Our finding showed a bile leak incidence of 16.6% and 6.6% in T-tube and non-T-tube groups, respectively. The results indicated a lower incidence of anastomotic fistulae in the non-T-tube group (0.6%) compared to the T-tube group (4%). The findings negated statistically significant differences in the three-year actuarial survival rates based on biliary anastomosis with and without T-tube intervention (62.5% vs. 69.8%). The studies revealed a 6-11% and 2-11% incidence of cholangitis in OLT patients with T-tube-based reconstruction and those without a T-tube, respectively, and 26% and 20% incidence of total biliary complications in OLT patients with and without T-tube, respectively. In addition, the findings ruled out the influence of a T-tube on the incidence of perioperative complications, endoscopies, and reoperations in OLT cases.

The current evidence correlates the increased incidence of bile leaks, cholangitis, and overall biliary complications with the use of a T-tube during OLT. In addition, T-tube-guided reconstruction has no impact on perioperative complications, overall survival, endoscopies, and reoperations in OLT cases.

Cannabis and Its Potential Protective Role Against Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review

Globally, around 15%-40% of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) use Cannabis for pain reduction, increased appetite, and reduced need for other medications. Although many patients report having benefited by using Cannabis in IBD, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the use of Cannabis in IBD. The aim is to identify, explore and map literature on the potential protective role of Cannabis against IBD through this scoping review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during the search to answer the focal question: (1) Does Cannabis play a protective role against IBD as assessed by clinical remission; (2) If yes, what is the mechanism of action for this protective role. There were only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies that satisfied the selection criteria of this scoping review. Although promising results including the improvement in general well-being/ Harvey-Bradshaw Index, health perception enhancement [4.1±1.43 to 7±1.42 (p = 0.0002)], weight gain, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score<150, Mayo scores (4-10), and reduction in clinical complications have been found in some studies, its medical use in IBD is still questionable due to the lack of high-quality evidence. Future RCTs studies should determine the cannabis treatment parameters and validate its safety and effectiveness in the IBD setting. The highlights include: the current literature provides inconclusive evidence concerning the protective role of cannabis for IBD patients; limited research evidence regarding the therapeutic use of cannabinoids for IBD warrants future investigation via RCTs; cannabis provides some benefits to IBD patients by improving their general well-being perceptions, Harvey-Bradshaw Index, Mayo scores, and minimizing their clinical complications.

Gastrointestinal Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis.. [DOI: 10.20944/preprints202108.0332.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Introduction: The gastrointestinal tract (GI) is the second most affected organ system in systemic sclerosis or systemic/localized scleroderma (SSc) and is an important topic for research. Approximately 90% of patients with scleroderma exhibit pathology of the GI tract. The systemic scleroderma has the potential to impact any part of the gastrointestinal tract, between the oral cavity and anorectum. The pathological complications of scleroderma adversely impact the health-related quality of life of the affected patients and increase the treatment burden of patients and medical professionals. Study Aim: We summarized the epidemiology, commonly reported clinical manifestations, complications, and available therapies for treating the GI pathology in systemic scleroderma patients. Methodology: We performed a literature review using the keywords "systemic sclerosis," "scleroderma," "GI manifestations in scleroderma," and "GI complications of scleroderma" across databases, including Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, and PubMed. We also analyzed a range of case reports concerning scleroderma manifestations and treatment modalities. Results: Our research revealed the annual incidence of SSc attributing to19.3 cases per million adults in the United States. We found the highest incidence of systemic scleroderma in patients within the age range of 44-55 years. Our results affirmed 5:1 incidence of systemic scleroderma that confirmed the higher impact of this disease condition in females than male populations. We found that the gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic scleroderma predominantly elevate the morbidity and mortality incidence among the affected patients. Esophageal and intestinal manifestations impact 90% and 40-70% of patients with systemic scleroderma. The small bowel hypomotility and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in systemic scleroderma cases trigger the episodes of malabsorption and malnutrition that eventually add to 50% of the mortality rate. Systemic sclerosis is associated with the high incidence of fecal incontinence that triggers depression and its deleterious mental health manifestations in many clinical scenarios. Conclusion: The gastrointestinal complications in systemic sclerosis potentially deteriorate the daily living activities of the affected patients. The systematic management of the gastrointestinal complications of systemic scleroderma warrants multidisciplinary approaches. Prospective studies should focus on developing targeted therapies for improving the recovery patterns and prognostic outcomes in systemic scleroderma cases.

Current systematic reviews and meta-analyses of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has left a significant impact on the world's health, economic and political systems; as of November 20, 2020, more than 57 million people have been infected worldwide, with over 1.3 million deaths. While the global spotlight is currently focused on combating this pandemic through means ranging from finding a treatment among existing therapeutic agents to inventing a vaccine that can aid in halting the further loss of life.

AIM

To collect all systematic reviews and meta-analyses published related to COVID-19 to better identify available evidence, highlight gaps in knowledge, and elucidate further meta-analyses and umbrella reviews that are yet to be performed.

METHODS

We explored studies based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses with the key-terms, including severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), SARS virus, coronavirus disease, COVID-19, and SARS coronavirus-2. The included studies were extracted from Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. The publication timeframe of included studies ranged between January 01, 2020, to October 30, 2020. Studies that were published in languages other than English were not considered for this systematic review. The finalized full-text articles are freely accessible in the public domain.

RESULTS

Searching Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases resulted in 1906, 669, and 19 results, respectively, that comprised 2594 studies. 515 duplicates were subsequently removed, leaving 2079 studies. The inclusion criteria were systematic reviews or meta-analyses. 860 results were excluded for being a review article, scope review, rapid review, panel review, or guideline that produced a total of 1219 studies. After screening articles were categorized, the included articles were put into main groups of clinical presentation, epidemiology, screening and diagnosis, severity assessment, special populations, and treatment. Subsequently, there was a second subclassification into the following groups: gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, neurological, stroke, thrombosis, anosmia and dysgeusia, ocular manifestations, nephrology, cutaneous manifestations, D-dimer, lymphocyte, anticoagulation, antivirals, convalescent plasma, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, technology, diabetes mellitus, obesity, pregnancy, children, mental health_, smoking, cancer, and transplant.

CONCLUSION

Among the included articles, it is clear that further research is needed regarding treatment options and vaccines. With more studies, data will be less heterogeneous, and statistical analysis can be better applied to provide more robust clinical evidence. This study was not designed to give recommendations regarding the management of COVID-19.

Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Hepatic Liver Abscess

A methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) liver abscess is a rare infection that if not recognized, and treated early, can be fatal. There is limited literature demonstrating possible etiologies of MRSA liver abscesses, whether nosocomial or community acquired. We present a case of a 45-year-old Guyanese male with a 30 pack-year smoking history. The patient presented with both generalized abdominal pain and a productive cough on two separate occasions. Laboratory results in his second presentation revealed leukocytosis with increased alanine transaminase (ALT). Imaging revealed a multiloculated abscess in the inferior aspect of the liver, measuring 5.1 cm x 3.4 cm x 4 cm, and chest X-ray revealed developing consolidation within the right perihilar region. The patient underwent percutaneous liver drainage via pigtail catheter. Fluid cultures grew MRSA. The patient was placed on vancomycin for three weeks. On subsequent examinations, there was a resolution of leukocytosis with no drainage from the pigtail catheter. Elevations of aspartate transaminase (AST), ALT, and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) were observed. Therefore, in addition to restarting vancomycin, the patient was started on ciprofloxacin for two weeks and liver function tests (LFTs) trended downwards, without recurrence of symptoms. High suspicion for liver abscess should exist in patients that present with complaints of abdominal pain and elevated LFTs when a previous source of infection has been observed. MRSA liver abscesses are rare and potentially fatal, therefore, early recognition and appropriate management is essential.

The association between COVID-19 and type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

/Aim: Various reports of the occurrence of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in patients with COVID-19 have been published, denoting an association between both diseases. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to summarize the prevalence of T1DM in COVID-19 patients and to identify the clinical presentations and outcomes in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Up to 10/27/2020, Medline, Embase, cochrane and google scholar databases were searched for original studies investigating the association between COVID-19 and T1DM. A manual search was conducted to identify missing studies. The quality of included studies was analyzed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) risk of bias tool. Outcomes included length of hospital stay, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), severe hypoglycemia, and death.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Included studies reported data of both adult and pediatric patients. The prevalence of T1DM in COVID-19 patients ranged from 0.15% to 28.98%, while the rate of COVID-19 in patients with T1DM ranged from 0% to 16.67%. Dry cough, nausea, vomiting, fever and elevated blood glucose levels were the most commonly reported presentations. The investigated outcomes varied widely among studied populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of T1DM in patients with COVID-19 ranged from 0.15% to 28.98%. The most common presentation of COVID-19 in patients with T1DM included fever, dry cough, nausea and vomiting, elevated blood glucose and diabetic ketoacidosis. The outcomes of COVID-19 in terms of length of hospital stay, hospitalization, ICU admission, DKA rate, and severe hypoglycemia were reported variably in included studies. Due to the heterogeneous study populations and the presence of many limitations, more studies are still warranted to reach a definitive conclusion.

The Association Between BMI and Inpatient Mortality Outcomes in Older Adults With COVID-19

Background and aim

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to cause a broad spectrum of illnesses. There is evidence that obesity-related conditions may increase the severity of COVID-19 disease, especially in those below the age of 60. However, there has been limited research on mortality rate based on body mass index (BMI) in the older adult population, defined as age over 65. The objective of this study was to characterize outcomes in older adults infected with COVID-19 based on BMI.

Study design and methods

It is a single-center retrospective cohort study of older adults with COVID-19 infection. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed were oxygen requirements, need for mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay. Data were analyzed with the Student’s t-test, Fisher’s exact test, and multiple logistic regression analyses as appropriate.

Results

A total of 290 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 77.6 years. The median BMI was >30 kg/m2. The primary outcome of hospital mortality occurred in 49.7% of patients. BMI was not found to be a predictor of mortality. Age 75-79 and age ≥ 85 were associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.15 - 5.79; OR: 3.17; 95% CI: 1.35 - 7.44, respectively). Patients with a BMI < 18.5, BMI 18.5 - 25, and age ≥ 85 were less likely to require mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.00 - 0.83; OR:0.11; 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.64 and OR:0.28; 95% CI: 0.09 - 0.92, respectively). Past medical history was not associated with mortality.

Conclusion

In a cohort of older adults with COVID-19 disease, BMI was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Patients with BMI ≤ 25 and age ≥ 85 years were less likely to require mechanical ventilation.